Open Access

Quantum dots incorporated magnetic nanoparticles for imaging colon carcinoma cells

Journal of Nanobiotechnology201311:28

DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-11-28

Received: 7 June 2013

Accepted: 14 August 2013

Published: 17 August 2013



Engineered multifunctional nanoparticles (NPs) have made a tremendous impact on the biomedical sciences, with advances in imaging, sensing and bioseparation. In particular, the combination of optical and magnetic responses through a single particle system allows us to serve as novel multimodal molecular imaging contrast agents in clinical settings. Despite of essential medical imaging modalities and of significant clinical application, only few nanocomposites have been developed with dual imaging contrast. A new method for preparing quantum dots (QDs) incorporated magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) based on layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly techniques have developed and used for cancer cells imaging.


Here, citrate - capped negatively charged Fe3O4 NPs were prepared and coated with positively - charged hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). Then, thiol - capped negatively charged CdTe QDs were electrostatically bound with CTAB. Morphological, optical and magnetic properties of the fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles (FMNPs) were characterized. Prepared FMNPs were additionally conjugated with hCC49 antibodies fragment antigen binding (Fab) having binding affinity to sialylated sugar chain of TAG-72 region of LS174T cancer cells, which was prepared silkworm expression system, and then were used for imaging colon carcinoma cells.


The prepared nanocomposites were magnetically responsive and fluorescent, simultaneously that are useful for efficient cellular imaging, optical sensing and magnetic separation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) revealed that the particle size is around 50 nm in diameter with inner magnetic core and outer CdTe QDs core-shell structure. Cytotoxicity test of prepared FMNPs indicates high viability in Vero cells. NPs conjugated with anti cancer antibodies were successfully labeled on colon carcinoma cells (LS174) in vitro and showed significant specificity to target cells.


The present report demonstrates a simple synthesis of CdTe QDs-Fe3O4 NPs. The surface of the prepared FMNPs was enabled simple conjugation to monoclonal antibodies by electrostatic interaction. This property further extended their in vitro applications as cellular imaging contrast agents. Such labeling of cells with new fluorescent-magneto nanoprobes for living detection is of interest to various biomedical applications and has demonstrated the potential for future medical use.


Core-shell structure Magnetic nanoparticles Quantum dots Fluorescent nanoparticles Cell imaging


The merging of dual natured components of optical and magnetic properties on nanoscale regime can enable new advance in molecular imaging and medical theranosis that are essential for early detection and rapid treatment of diseases [1, 2]. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), e.g. Fe3O4 NPs, are of immense importance in the emerging area of nanomedicine because of their ability to be manipulated and detected with an external magnetic field. They can be used in numerous applications, both in vitro and in vivo, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement [3], bioseparation [4], biosensing [5], cancer therapy using magnetic hyperthermia [6], and targeted drug delivery [7]. Although MNPs appear to be the currently preferred cell-labeling materials, the poor signal intensity on MRI limits their clinical utility [8]. MNPs label is a major limitation for long-term tracking, as the magnetic resonance signal is lost over time due to cellular proliferation, especially with rapidly dividing cells. Hence, more efficient cellular-internalizing methods are highly preferable. Regardless of magnetic imaging, optical techniques offer improved high spatial resolution allowing the visualization of cell structures. They are used for the simultaneous visualization of multiple modalities with two or more fluorescent probes with different spectra, but have limited depth of imaging and poor absolute quantitative accuracy due to the absorption of light in tissues. Magnetic imaging has no practical limitation in terms of the depth of imaging; however, spatial resolution is poor and imaging with more than one probe is problematic [9]. Therefore, it is conceivable that one single agent to provide imaging in multiple imaging modalities (optical and magnetic) would be of great value to offer more comprehensive diagnostic information and the dynamics of disease progression. An example of such multifunctional NPs are FMNPs that bear two attractive features, fluorescence and superparamagnetism, allowing their intracellular movements to be controlled using magnetic force and monitored using a fluorescent microscopy, simultaneous delivery of fluorescence and magnetic particles to individual cells offers the opportunity of correlating optical images and MRI [8, 10]. These features could lead to effective multifunctional drug-loaded MNPs that would facilitate increased drug transport rates, mucus penetration, antibiotic efficiency in biofilms and cellular imaging.

Semiconductor nanocrystals called quantum dots (QDs) is well known promising candidate as fluorescent materials for its high photostability, high emission quantum yield, narrow emission peak, size dependent wavelength tunability in comparison with organic dyes and fluorescent proteins. These properties of QDs make them more interesting for potential biomedical application such as protein trafficking, DNA detection, cellular imaging and dynamic studies of cell motility. QDs owing to their inorganic nature, are more robust than organic dyes and therefore their reduced photobleaching under light allows for real-time monitoring of biological events over extended periods of time [11, 12]. Taking the advantages of QDs and MNPs, we designed, prepared and characterized new dual-marker particles, simultaneously combining both fluorescence nanocrystals, such as QDs and superparamagnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) in one entity. Considerable research has been devoted to the combination of magnetic and fluorescent properties in a single nanocomposites [1, 2, 13]. However, many of those synthetic processes usually involve complexed multi-step reactions [1416]. Alternatively, a rapid one-pot self-assembly synthesis using controlled electrostatic force may improve photostability and colloidal stability. The cytotoxicity of prepared NPs was investigated in Vero cells using the trypan blue in vitro assay. The result indicates the cytotoxicity of FMNPs were reduced with dilution and allowed its potential use in biomedical application. The prepared FMNPs were further applied to cancer cell imaging using monoclonal antibodies against specific markers on cancer as a tool for therapy. Humanized monoclonal antibody CC49 (hCC49) [17] is a clinically validated antibody to target tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72) a well-known marker in colon carcinoma [18, 19].

In this work, fragment antigen binding (Fab) region of hCC49 was conjugated with FMNPs, which was used for specific cancer cell imaging. Fluorescence microscopy showed significant preferential binding of the NPs conjugates by cells. Such a nanoprobe could potentially be used to image resections of cancer cells in real time and to correlate preoperative diagnostic images with intraoperative pathology at cellular-level resolution.

Results and discussion

Spectroscopic study of CdTe QDs and FMNPs

The absorbance and photoluminescence (PL) intensity of QDs are shown in Figure 1A. The absorbance shoulder of QDs was located at 502 nm, while the PL peak of QDs was situated at 522 nm. According to Peng’s equation [20], the particle size of QDs was about 2.85 nm and concentration was 2.17 μM.
Figure 1

Spectroscopic analysis of CdTe QDa and FMNPs. (A) Absorbance and PL spectra of CdTe QDs; (B) PL spectra of FMNPs and supernatant solution.

Fluorescence emission spectrum of FMNPs was recorded for the supernatant and residue after magnetic separation from the reaction mixtures. Residual solution remained strong fluorescence intensity while supernatant had ignorable PL intensity (Figure 1B). This indicates most of QDs capped on MNPs. Such a stable PL property is favorable for labeling cancer cells [8]. It is worth noting that the PL peak position (at 540 nm) for FMNPs in solutions red – shifted [8] compared with free QDs, suggesting that some free NPs may aggregate to form clusters through partial electrostatic force. The clustering of individual QDs causes slight degradation of energy level, leading to narrower energy band gap and band broadening. However, it did not observe any further uncontrolled aggregation of QDs that may bring fluorescence quenching in the experiments because of strong repulsion forces among QDs through their highly negative surface charges.

Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF), transmission electron microscope (TEM) images and dynamic light scattering (DLS) studies of FMNPs

TIRF image shows the dark core made up of Fe3O4 NPs showing no fluorescence, whereas electrostatically adsorbed CdTe QDs covering the surface of NPs show distinct fluorescence (Figure 2A). Some single particle with district fluorescence property is also shown in inset of Figure 2A. TEM image of the FMNPs have shown the formation of core-shell NPs (Figure 2B). Fe3O4 NPs that are shown in black color, were covered by CdTe QDs that are shown transparent color. DLS data suggest that the size of FMNPs is about 50 nm (Figure 2C). Taking together these results smaller size CdTe QDs covered the surface of core Fe3O4 NPs. CTAB (not shown) between QDs and Fe3O4 NPs will avoid NPs to come in contact of each other, which would be helpful for better fluorescence emission. Due to the strong electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged -COO- groups on the surface of the CdTe QDs and the positively charged quaternary amino groups of the CTAB, some QDs are forced to aggregate and forming a thick shell. It is better to notify that the size of NPs in TIRF image is bigger than TEM image. Usually, TIRF microscope has limitation to measure small particle size. In this study, TIRF microscope specially used to observe core (dark) and shell (green) structure of FMNPs.
Figure 2

Images of TIRF (A) and TEM (B), and DLS (C). Bars in A and B denote 1 μm and 50 nm, respectively.

Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) study of FMNPs

The FMNPs were prepared by encapsulating inorganic magnetic particles covered by inorganic QDs. The MNPs were coated with CTAB and CdTe QDs using self-assembly method. Both the Fe3O4 MNPs and FMNPs exhibited typical superparamagnetic behavior due to no hysteresis. The remanence and coercivity are zero, illustrating that the particles respond magnetically to an external magnetic field, and redisperse rapidly when the magnetic field is removed. Figure 3 shows hysteresis loops of the proposed MNPs and FMNPs, which indicate that they possess a magnetic saturation value of about 71.0 and 65.0 emug-1. This large saturation magnetization makes them very susceptible to magnetic fields. The decrease in the overall magnetization values indicates that the Fe3O4 surface is covered with nonmagnetic materials such as mostly QDs and some organic materials of CTAB and stabilizers. These FMNPs have superparamagnetism, and no magnetism remains without the magnetic field. These properties make the FMNPs a useful tool for micro-separation in fluidic systems.
Figure 3

Hysteresis loops of the FMNPs. Magnetic properties of FMNPs and MNPs were measured using SQUID at 300 K.

Stability of FMNPs and cell viability in the presence of FMNPs

As far as the stability of FMNPs, the FMNPs are in aqueous solution at room temperature for > 1 month. PL intensity of FMNPs did not deteriorate until 4 weeks (Figure 4A). This superior colloidal stability of FMNPs results from the cationic surfactant layer between QDs and MNPs which avoids QDs to come in close proximity to MNPs and retained its optical properties. FMNPs can be precipitate using external magnetic field and redispersed in water. This type of precipitation-redispersion can be repeated many times, suggesting that NPs structures are very robust in nature. Fluorescence images of FMNPs during washing and cell labeling are also shown stable optical properties (Figure 4B).
Figure 4

Stability of prepared FMNPs at room temperature (A), fluorescence images of FMNPs at different stages (B), and cell viability in the presence of FMNPs (C). The cytotoxicity of the FMNPs was measured using Vero cells by the trypan blue exclusion test.

FMNPs are toxic for Vero cells, but dilution of FMNPs led to lower cytotoxicity. About 64 times diluted solution of FMNPs has shown no cytotoxicity (Figure 4C). Compared with TGA-capped CdTe QDs, the as-prepared QDs showed lower cytotoxicity under the same conditions (data not shown). Generally, CdTe QDs are highly toxic for cells due to the release of Cd2+ ions [21]. However, the prepared FMNPs reduce the cytotoxicity of QDs to a small extent. A reasonable interpretation is that the outer surface of FMNPs was covered by quaternary ammonium groups and leading to less released Cd2+ ions.

Confirmation of FMNPs conjugated with Fab region of hCC49 antibody

FMNPs conjugated with Fab region of hCC49 antibodies are confirmed with bead enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Higher signal was observed with Fab antibody modified FMNPs than only FMNPs (Figure 5), suggesting that the FMNPs was successfully conjugated with antibodies.
Figure 5

ELISA result for antibody conjugated with FMNPs. Anti-FLAG antibody and hCC49 antibody Fab region conjugation were performed on FMNPs.

Cellular imaging of colon carcinoma cells using FMNPs conjugated with Fab region of hCC49 antibody

Specific binding between FMNPs and cancer cells was observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vitro. When LS174T cancer cells were incubated with FMNPs conjugated with Fab region of hCC49 antibodies, green fluorescence around the nucleus (Figure 6D) confirming Fab region of antibodies bound with sialylated sugar chain in TAG-72 region of LS174T cancer cells. As a negative control, LS174T cancer cells were incubated without hCC49 antibodies Fab region-conjugated FMNPs. However, negative cells show only nucleus staining by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenyindole (DAPI) (Figure 6E), no green fluorescence around the nucleus. For more specificity, HEK293 cells were incubated with FMNPs conjugated with Fab region of hCC49 antibodies and merged image of DAPI and fluorescence confirmed no green fluorescence around the nucleus (Figure 6C and F). This indicates that HEK293 cells have no specific binding site of Fab region of hCC49 antibodies. Cell morphology was maintained after being incubated with the FMNPs, which implies that the nanocomposites had no cytotoxic effect on the cancer cells. In addition, these confocal images confirmed that the NPs were bound the cell surface and the NPs accumulated uniformly around cell surface.
Figure 6

Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of cancer cells. Differential interference contrast (DIC) images of LS174T cells with (A), without (B) hCC49 antibody Fab region conjugated FMNPs, and 293 T cells with hCC49 antibody Fab region conjugated FMNPs (C). Merged images of DAPI/Fluorescence for LS174T cells with (D), without (E) hCC49 antibody Fab region conjugated FMNPs, and 293 T cells with hCC49 antibody Fab region conjugated FMNPs (F).


In conclusion, dual modal fluorescent-magnetic nanocomposites based on fluorescent CdTe QDs and Fe3O4 MNPs were developed by a simple LbL fabrication. This self-assembly technique retains the magnetic and fluorescence properties of FMNPs. FMNPs had good optical properties, and decent saturation magnetization. Further in vitro studies showing less toxicity at 64 fold dilutions and the ability to interact with cancer cells showing the ability of the FMNPs probes for imaging. Ultimately, it is believed that these particles will provide a new class of multimodal NPs for the complex biologic systems.



Cadmium perchlorate hydrate, thioglycolic acid solution (TGA) and hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Aluminum telluride (Al2Te3) with the highest purity was acquired from Cerac Inc. (Albuquerque, NM, USA). Ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, trisodium citrate dihydrate and ammonium solution were purchased from Wako Pure Chem. Inc. (Osaka, Japan). LS174T human colon adenocarcinoma cell line (ATCC No. 50845) and Vero cell (No. CCL-81) strains were purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA).

Synthesis of CdTe QDs

CdTe-QDs has been synthesized as previously reported [22]. Shortly, 0.985 g (2.35 mmol) of Cd(ClO4)2 · 6H2O was dissolved in 125 ml of water, and 5.7 mmol of the TGA added under stirring, followed by adjusting pH to appropriate values (11.4–11.6) by dropwise addition of 1 M NaOH. The solution was placed in a three-necked flask and deaerated by nitrogen gas-bubbling for 30 min. Under stirring, H2Te gas (generated by the reaction of 0.2 g (0.46 mmol) of Al2Te3 lumps with 15–20 ml of 0.5 M H2SO4 under nitrogen atmosphere) was passed through the solution together with a slow nitrogen flow for 20 min. CdTe precursors formed were converted to CdTe nanocrystals by refluxing the reaction mixture at 100°C under open-air conditions with condenser attached for 20 min. The UV and PL spectra of CdTe QDs were recorded using a Tecan infinite M 200 spectrophotometer. The samples were excited at 380 nm, and the exciting and the emission slits were 5 and 10 nm, respectively.

Synthesis of Fe3O4 NPs

The preparation of citrate-capped Fe3O4 NPs was synthesized using the previously described method with minor modification [23]. The reaction mixture contained 1.622 g of FeCl3 · 6H2O and 0.994 g of FeCl2 · 4H2O, were mixed with 40 ml of distilled water. Five ml of concentrated ammonia aqueous (28%) was added in this solution and heated at 90°C. Then, 4.4 g sodium citrate was added and continued the reaction for 30 min. The MNPs thus obtained were washed with anhydrous ethanol and redispersed in deionized water for further use. Particle size and electric charge the prepared Fe3O4 NPs were measured by dynamic light scattering (ZetaSizer Nano-ZS, Malvern, UK).

Preparation of FMNPs

New synthesis method for fluorescent-magnetic nanocomposites structure were prepared based on simple and efficient LbL self-assembly method [24]. Briefly, 100 ml Fe3O4 NPs were dispersed in 5 ml of CTAB (10 mg/ml) solution under vagarious stirring. Next, 200 ml of ammonia solution was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min. Cationic surfactant CTAB capped Fe3O4 NPs by electrostatic force at this stage. Then, 200 ml of CdTe QDs was added and mixtures were stirred at room temperature for 2 h for binding of QDs with CTAB. The resulting FMNPs were collected by external magnetic field, washed three times with MilliQ water and redispersed in MilliQ water for further use. The PL spectra of FMNPs were recorded using a Tecan infinite M 200 spectrophotometer. The samples were excited at 380 nm, and the exciting slit and the emission slit were 5 and 10 nm, respectively.

TIRF microscope and TEM Imaging of FMNPs

TIRF microscope (Leica AM TIRF MC, Germany) was used to observe fluorescence image of FMNPs. Two hundred microliter FMNPs solutions were loaded in glass-bottom-dishes and samples were excited using 400 nm wavelength. The TEM image of FMNPs was recorded using JEM 2000FX II-TEM (JOEL Ltd., Akishima, Japan). The samples were spotted onto carbon grids (Okenshoji, Tokyo, Japan), dried at room temperature and observed at 50,000 × magnification operating at 160 kV.

Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) measurement

SQUID magnetometry was used to measure the saturation magnetizations of naked MNPs and FMNPs at 300 K. Aliquots (200 μl) of the MilliQ suspension of MNPs and FMNPs were placed in micro centrifuge tube and allowed to vacuum evaporation (Centrifugal evaporator CVE-2000, EYELA, Japan). Magnetic measurements were made on a Quantum Design MPMS-7 SQUID (San Diego, CA, USA) magnetometer.

Cell lines and cell cultures

HEK293 was obtained from Riken Bio Resource Center (RCB1637). LS174T cells were cultured in 60 mm culture plates (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland) with minimal essential media-eagle (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) containing 10%(v/v) fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA), supplemented with 1%(v/v) antibiotic solution containing penicillin, streptomycin, fungizone (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator (MCO-175 Sanyo, Osaka, Japan).

HEK293 cells were cultured in 60 mm culture plates with MEM/EBSS (HyClone Laboratories Inc., Utah, USA) containing 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum, supplemented with 1% (v/v) antibiotic solution containing penicillin, streptomycin, fungizone and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator. Both the cell lines were grown till confluence and splitting was done in 1:5 ratio once every week by trypsinisation using TrypLE Express (Life Technologies Japan LTD., Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan) for 15 min at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator.

Trypan blue test

The cytotoxicity of the FMNPs were determined using the trypan blue exclusion test, which determines the number of viable cells present in a cell suspension. In 96-well plates, 100 μl suspension of Vero cells (5 × 104 cells/ml) in 5%(v/v) horse serum containing minimum essential medium was added per well and incubated in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37°C for 24 h. Then different diluted solutions of FMNPs were added to each well and further incubate at 37°C for 24 h. After medium was removed, 0.25% trypsin was added in all wells. The plate was centrifuged (Centrifuge 5430, Eppendorf AG, Germany), removed supernatant and redispersed in 5%(v/v) horse serum minimal essential medium. The 96-well plates were further incubated for 15 min. Fifteen microliter of trypan blue was added to each cell well. The resulting mixture was gently shaken for 10 min at room temperature. Cell numbers were counted using haemocytometer (Line Seiki, Tokyo, Japan) under microscope (Model CHT, Olympus optical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and the percentage of viability was calculated.

Preparation of hCC49 antibody Fab regions

The gene of hCC49 antibody [19] was amplified from plasmid pDong1 (hCC49), which is a gift from Professor Hiroshi Ueda of Chemical Resources Laboratory of Tokyo Institute of Technology by PCR using primers bx-FLAG-hCC49VHCH-F (5’-CACCATGAAGATACTCCTTGCTATTGCATTAATGTTGTCAACAGTAATGTGGGTGTCAACATGGAGCCACCCGCAGTTCGAAAAGATGAAATACCTATTG-3’) and hCC49VHCH-R (5’-CTATGCGGCCCCATTCAG-3’) for hCC49VHCH1, primers bx-FLAG-hCC49VLCL-F (5’-CACCATGAAGATACTCCTTGCTATTGCATTAATGTTGTCAACAGTAATGTGGGTGTCAACAGACTACAAGGATGACGATGACAAGGATATTGTGATGACC-3’) and hCC49VLCL-R (5’-TCACTCTCCCCTGTTGAA-3’) for hCC49VLCL. The amplified genes were inserted into pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen), respectively, to make pENTR/D-hCC49VHCH1 and pENTR/D-hCC49VLCL by the topoisomerase reaction. Using the above plasmids, the gene was inserted into pDEST8 using Gateway technology (Invitrogen) to construct pDEST-hCC49VHCH1 and pDEST-hCC49VLCL, which were then used to transform E. coli BmDH10Bac to obtain the recombinant Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrin (BmNPV) bacmids, rBmNPV-hCC49VHCH1 and rBmNPV-hCC49VLCL. The recombinant bacmids (10 μg each) were mixed with one-tenth volume of DMRIE-C (Invitrogen) and incubated at room temperature for over 45 min. Fifty microliters of this mixture was injected into a silkworm larva on the first day of the fifth instar larvae (Ehime Sansyu Co. Ltd., Ehime, Japan). Injected silkworm larvae were reared for 5–7 days, and the hemolymph collected was centrifuged to remove hemocytes at 2400 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was used as a hemolymph sample for purification. Fab antibodies were purified with an ANTI-FLAG M2 Affinity Gel (Sigma) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer.

Conjugation of hCC49 antibody Fab region with FMNPs and its binding activity

To apply FMNPs on bioimaging, the NPs were conjugated with hCC49 antibodies Fab region to assess their potential as fluorescent probes for LS174T cancer cells. Fab region of hCC49 antibodies has binding affinity with sialylated sugar chain in TAG-72 region of LS174T cancer cells. Electrostatic interaction between positively charged FMNPs (+18.3 mV, measured by ZetaSizer, Nano-ZS, Malvern, UK) and negatively charged of hCC49 antibodies (−3.53 mV, Tris glycin at pH 8.5, measured by ZetaSizer, Nano-ZS, Malvern, UK) was used to bind each other. NPs were dissolved in hCC49 antibodies (final concentration of 20 μg/ml) and kept at 10°C for 2 h with continuous stirring. To check whether antibodies were bound with FMNPs or not, at first FMNPs were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA). After incubation at room temperature for 2 h, samples were washed three times with PBS buffer solution and redispersed in anti-FLAG antibodies conjugated horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, USA) with a final concentration of 1 ng/ml. After incubation at room temperature for 1 h, samples were washed three times with PBS buffer solution and transferred to a new tube. Signal was developed with 100 μl 3,3’,5.5’-tetramethylbenzidine (TMBZ, Sigma) substrate solution (20 μg ml-1 TMBZ and 0.2 μl H2O2 in 1 ml NaOAc, pH 6.0) for 5–30 min at 25°C. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 μl of 10% H2SO4 and absorbance of reaction supernatant was recorded at 450 nm with a reference at 655 nm using a micro plate reader (Model 680, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Cellular imaging using hCC49 antibody Fab region conjugated FMNPs

Colon carcinoma cancer cells (LS174T) were seeded on slide glass 24 h prior to labeling and staining. LS174T cells were cultured with hCC49-conjugated NPs, without hCC49-conjugated NPs and HEK293 cells were cultured with hCC49-conjugated NPs for 24 h in a 37°C humidified incubator maintained at 5% CO2. After incubation, fixation of the cells were carried out using 10%(v/v) formalin for 20 min and rinsed four times using PBS (pH 7.5). Then, 50 mmol NH4Cl solutions were added and washed four times with PBS (pH 7.5). Next, 4% BSA solution was used as a blocking agent for 1 h at RT. Following labeling, the slide glasses were washed four times PBS buffer (pH 7.5). After washes, cellular nuclei were stained with 1% (v/v) solution of DAPI in 2% BSA solution in PBS buffer (pH 7.5) for 1 h and washed with PBS (pH 7.5) four times. Confocal images were acquired using a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 700, Carl Zeiss Microimaging GmbH, 07740 Jena, Germany) and Image processing was performed using LSM Software ZEN 2010.



Bovine serum albumin


Hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide

CdTe QD: 

Cadmium telluride quantum dot




Dynamic light scattering


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Fragment antigen binding

Fe3O4 NP: 

Iron oxide nanoparticle


Fluorescent-magnetic nanoparticle


Humanized monoclonal antibody CC49


Human embryo kidney


Layer by Layer


Magnetic nanoparticle


Magnetic resonance imaging






Quantum dot


Superconducting quantum interference device


Tumor associated glycoprotein-72


Transmission electron microscopy


Thioglycolic acid


Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence





We thank Mr. Motoyasu Fujiwara, Institute for Molecular Science of National Institutes of Natural Science, for kind helping the SQUID assays. This work was supported partly by Promotion of Nanobio-Technology Research to support Aging and Welfare Society from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. There was no additional external funding received for this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Bioscience, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Shizuoka University
Department of Nano Fusion Technology, College of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Pusan National University
Department of Applied Biological Chemistry, Shizuoka University
Green Chemistry Research Division, Research Institute of Green Science and Technology, Shizuoka University
Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University


  1. Cheon J, Lee JH: Synergistically integrated nanoparticles as multimodal probes for nanobiotechnology. Acc Chem Res. 2008, 41: 1630-1640. 10.1021/ar800045c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mahmoudi M, Shokrgozar MA: Multifunctional stable fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles. Chem Commun. 2012, 48: 3957-3959. 10.1039/c2cc30213f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Xu W, Kattel K, Park JY, Chang Y, Kim TJ, Lee GH: Paramagnetic nanoparticle T1 and T2 MRI contrast agents. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012, 14: 12687-12700. 10.1039/c2cp41357d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao F, Yao JL, Ren-Ao Gu RA: Synthesis of magnetic Fe2O3/Au core/shell nanoparticles for bioseparation and immunoassay based on surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy. Langmuir. 2009, 25: 10782-10787. 10.1021/la901337r.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang Y, Dostalek J, Knoll W: Magnetic nanoparticle-enhanced biosensor based on grating-coupled surface plasmon resonance. Anal Chem. 2011, 83: 6202-6207. 10.1021/ac200751s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kobayashi T: Cancer hyperthermia using magnetic nanoparticles. Biotechnol J. 2011, 6: 1342-1347. 10.1002/biot.201100045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Verma NK, Crosbie-Staunton K, Satti A, Gallagher S, Ryan KB, Doody T, McAtamney C, MacLoughlin R, Galvin P: Magnetic core-shell nanoparticles for drug delivery by nebulization. J Nanobiotechnol. 2013, 11: 1-10.1186/1477-3155-11-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ge Y, Zhang Y, He S, Nie F, Teng G, Gu N: Fluorescence modified chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles for high-efficient cellular imaging. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2009, 4: 287-295. 10.1007/s11671-008-9239-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chekina N, Horak D, Jendelova P, Trchova M, Benes MJ, Hruby M, Herynek V, Turnovcova K, Sykova E: Fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem. 2011, 21: 7630-7639. 10.1039/c1jm10621j.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Vargas JM, McBride AA, Plumley JB, Fichou Y, Memon TA, Shah V, Cook NC, Akins BA, Rivera AC: Synthesis and characterization of core/shell Fe 3O4/ZnSe fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles. J Appl Phys. 2011, 109: 07B536-07B563-Google Scholar
  11. Zhang B, Chen B, Wang Y, Guo F, Li Z, Shi D: Preparation of highly fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for analytes-enrichment and subsequent biodetection. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 353: 426-432. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.084.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Quarta A, Di Corato R, Manna L, Ragusa A, Pellegrino T: Fluorescent-magnetic hybrid nanostructures: preparation, properties, and applications in biology. NanoBiosci, IEEE Trans on. 2007, 6: 298-308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu A, Wilson RJ, Smith BR, Mullenix J, Earhart C, Akin D, Guccione S, Wang SX, Gambhir SS: Fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles for magnetically enhanced cancer imaging and targeting in living subjects. ACS Nano. 2012, 6: 6862-6869. 10.1021/nn301670a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Yang J, Lee J, Kang J, Chung CH, Lee K, Suh JS, Yoon HG, Huh YM, Haam S: Magnetic sensitivity enhanced novel fluorescent magnetic silica nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Nanotechnol. 2008, 19: 075610-10.1088/0957-4484/19/7/075610.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebrahiminezhad A, Ghasemi Y, Rasoul-Amini S, Barar J, Davaran S: Preparation of novel magnetic fluorescent nanoparticles using amino acids. Colloids Surf, B. 2013, 102: 534-539.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang IP, Hwang KC, Chiang CS: Preparation of fluorescent magnetic nanodiamonds and cellular imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2008, 130: 15476-15481. 10.1021/ja804253y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kashmiri SV, Iwahashi M, Tamura M, Padlanm EA, Milenic DE, Schlom J: Development of a minimally immunogenic variant of humanized anti-carcinoma monoclonal antibody CC49. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2001, 38: 3-16. 10.1016/S1040-8428(00)00133-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Alderson RF, Toki BE, Roberge M, Geng W, Basler J, Chin R, Liu A, Ueda R, Hodges D: Characterization of a CC49-based single-chain fragment-beta-lactamase fusion protein for antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT). Bioconjug Chem. 2006, 17: 410-418. 10.1021/bc0503521.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Yoon SO, Lee TS, Kim SJ, Jang MH, Kang YJ, Park JH, Kim KS, Lee HS, Ryu CJ: Construction, affinity maturation, and biological characterization of an anti-tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 humanized antibody. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 6985-6992. 10.1074/jbc.M511165200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Yu WW, Qu L, Guo W, Peng X: Experimental determination of the extinction coefficient of CdTe, CdSe, and CdS nanocrystals. Chem Mater. 2003, 15: 2854-2860. 10.1021/cm034081k.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Derfus AM, Chan WCW, Bhatia SN: Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum dots. Nano Lett. 2003, 4: 11-18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaponik N, Talapin DV, Rogach AL, Hoppe K, Shevchenko EV, Kornowski A, Eychmüller A, Weller H: Thiol-capping of CdTe nanocrystals: an alternative to organometallic synthetic routes. J Phys Chem B. 2002, 106: 7177-7185.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang B, Zhang X, Guo J, Sun Y, Tang H, Ren Q, Yang W: General one-pot strategy to prepare multifunctional nanocomposites with hydrophilic colloidal nanoparticles core/mesoporous silica shell structure. J of Colloid Interf Sci. 2012, 377: 64-75. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.03.082.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ahmed S, Hong S, Lee J: Optical and electrical nano eco-sensors using alternative deposition of charged layer. Front Mater Sci. 2011, 5: 40-49. 10.1007/s11706-011-0117-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Ahmed et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.