Skip to main content

Table 3 Cell proliferation after transfection

From: Comparison of nanoparticle-mediated transfection methods for DNA expression plasmids: efficiency and cytotoxicity

 

pIRES-hrGFPII-eIL-12

pIRES-hrGFPII-rHMGB1

 

48 h

72 h

48 h

72 h

FHD

172.57 ± 53.44

111.06 ± 18.72*

201.13 ± 52.57

91.23 ± 1.04*

Plano ® -AuNP

72.99 ± 39.32*

64.65 ± 14.19*

154.49 ± 28.71

83.81 ± 8.34*

LAG-AuNP S1

126.19 ± 41.31

174.86 ± 18.54

103.00 ± 21.84*

193.48 ± 14.05

LAG-AuNP S2

98.95 ± 25.09*

200.93 ± 7.52

140.53 ± 30.20

196.35 ± 15.79

MALipofection

132.24 ± 21.05

153.30 ± 12.38

153.17 ± 47.41

179.62 ± 24.20

MATra-A

165.15 ± 42.89

145.88 ± 40.31

143.72 ± 22.50

153.77 ± 13.07

MTH53A Cells

191.84 ± 25.75

188.01 ± 20.11

185.07 ± 21.15

178.11 ± 21.01

  1. Cell proliferation 48 h and 72 h after transfection with pIRES-hrGFPII-eIL-12 or pIRES-hrGFP-HMGB1. Results are expressed as mean absorbance values ± SD. * p ≤ 0.05.
Back to article page

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us