Skip to main content

Table 2 Recovery of SERS ICSs for detecting haemoglobin and Cd2+

From: Rough surface Au@Ag core–shell nanoparticles to fabricating high sensitivity SERS immunochromatographic sensors

Analytes

Samples

Spiked concentrations (ng/mL)

Detected by SERS ICSs (ng/mL)

Recovery of ICS (%)b

Coefficient of variation (%)c

Detect by ELISA/ICP-MASS (ng/mL)

Haemoglobin

Stool processed solution

1000

840 ± 125

84

14.8

920.3 ± 53.3

800

751 ± 38

93.9

5.06

810 ± 61

200

183 ± 14

91.5

7.65

188.6 ± 11.3

50

47 ± 3.2

94

6.8

46.6 ± 3.9

Serum

1000

1090 ± 60.4

109

5.54

990 ± 44.6

500

518 ± 18.2

103.6

3.51

481.4 ± 38.4

100

111 ± 9.1

111

8.2

99.5 ± 7.3

Cd2+

Pearl river water

250

246.7 ± 4.4

98.68

1.78

226.7 ± 40.4

50

54.3 ± 8.1

108.67

14.99

54.3 ± 8.1

10

11.0 ± 2.6

110.00

24.05

11.0 ± 2.6

2

1.9 ± 0.2

92.50

11.78

1.9 ± 0.2

Tap water

250

246.7 ± 10.0

96.00

4.17

246.7 ± 10.0

50

55.0 ± 6.6

110.00

11.92

55.0 ± 6.6

10

12.0 ± 1.7

120.00

14.43

12.0 ± 1.7

2

2.1 ± 0.2

106.67

10.83

2.1 ± 0.2

Soil leaching water

250

230.0 ± 26.5

92.00

11.50

230.0 ± 26.5

50

58.0 ± 2

116.00

3.45

58.0 ± 2

10

10.3 ± 2.5

103.33

24.35

10.3 ± 2.5

2

2.1 ± 0.2

105.83

11.65

2.1 ± 0.2

  1. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
  2. aSERS ICSs procedure is described in the text
  3. bRecovery (%) = (detected concentration/spiked concentration) × 100
  4. cCoefficient of variation (CV) calculated as CV = (SD/mean) × 100 %