Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nanoparticles functionalized with stem cell secretome and CXCR4-overexpressing endothelial membrane for targeted osteoporosis therapy

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 20, Article number: 35 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition affecting patients’ morbidity and mortality and represents a big socioeconomic burden. Because stem cells can proliferate and differentiate into bone-forming cells, stem cell therapy for osteoporosis has been widely studied. However, cells as a live drug face multiple challenges because of their instability during preservation and transportation. In addition, cell therapy has potential adverse effects such as embolism, tumorigenicity, and immunogenicity.

Results

Herein, we sought to use cell-mimicking and targeted therapeutic nanoparticles to replace stem cells. We fabricated nanoparticles (NPs) using polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) loaded with the secretome (Sec) from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to form MSC-Sec NPs. Furthermore, we cloaked the nanoparticles with the membranes from C–X–C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4)-expressing human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs) to generate MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP. CXCR4 can target the nanoparticles to the bone microenvironment under osteoporosis based on the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis.

Conclusions

In a rat model of osteoporosis, MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP were found to accumulate in bone, and such treatment inhibited osteoclast differentiation while promoting osteogenic proliferation. In addition, our results showed that MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs reduce OVX-induced bone mass attenuation in OVX rats.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis is recognized by decreased bone mass and degraded bone microstructure due to an imbalance of osteoclasts and osteoblasts [1,2,3]. This disease affects millions of people worldwide with increased bone fragility and risk of bone fracture. Bisphosphonates, a class of drugs that increase bone mineral density, have been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis [4]. However, there are potential side effects such as increased risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atrial fibrillation, and atypical femur fracture [5, 6]. A novel therapy is possible with the advancement of stem cell-based therapy, which has been confirmed to reduce the susceptibility to fractures and improve the density of lost minerals by either increasing the number of resident stem cells or inducing them to proliferate and differentiate into bone-forming cells [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Nevertheless, living cells are unstable and thus the preservation of stem cells is an obstacle for further application [9, 13, 14]. In addition, living cells-based treatment normally does not offer off-the-shelf options. Thus, a novel therapeutic strategy is highly desirable to prevent and control osteoporosis.

Growing evidence indicates that most transplanted stem cells do not engraft into the recipient organs but instead exert their function by paracrine effects [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Stem cells release cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and different types of extracellular vesicles (EVs) as part of their paracrine signaling system. To mimic the biofunction of stem cells, we and other groups have developed synthetic stem cells by loading conditioned medium to coat the cell membrane for injured heart or liver regeneration [21,22,23,24,25]. We have confirmed the synthetic stem cells’ superior stability even after repeated freeze–thaw cycles while maintaining high therapeutic efficiency. In this work, we synthesized mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) secretomes (Sec)-loaded polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (MSC-Sec NPs) to mimic the real stem cells (Scheme 1). Furthermore, previous studies have indicated that MSCs possess the ability to sense the injured tissue and migrate to the damaged area via the interaction between chemo-attractant stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) and its receptor chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4); blocking CXCR4 inhibited MSC migration. By taking advantage of the homing and engraftment capacity induced by the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis [26,27,28], we coated MSC-Sec NPs with human microvascular endothelial cell (HMEC) membranes, which have high levels of CXCR4 (MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs) for the treatment of osteoporosis. Furthermore, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) has been reported to increase the expression level of CXCR4 on cell membranes [29], which could enhance their homing to bone marrow. We expected MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs to sense SDF-1 and migrate to the site of damage, where they release loaded paracrine molecules and can reverse osteoporosis.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Composition/structure of stem cell mimicking MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs and schematic showing the concept of using MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs in the treatment of osteoporosis

Full size image

Results and discussion

Fabrication and characterization of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs

To mimic the biofunction of MSCs, we first synthesized MSC conditioned medium-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles (MSC-Sec NPs). Many studies have confirmed that stem cell therapy is mainly attributed to paracrine effects. Stem cell-secreted factors such as osteoprotegerin (OPG, a potent inhibitor of osteoclastogenesis) and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2, an inducer for osteoblast differentiation), promote healing and tissue repair [30,31,32]. Thus, the Sec of MSCs is expected to promote osteogenesis and inhibit osteoclasts, making Sec a potential treatment option for osteoporosis. First, we quantified the concentration of OPG and BMP-2 in Sec via ELISA, resulting in 17.5 pg per μg of protein and 1.7 pg per μg protein, respectively under normal oxygen culture (Additional file 1: Table S1). In addition, because the culture conditions may have an effect on the concentration of secreted factors, we quantified the concentration of OPG and BMP-2 under hypoxia, and the results, 18.1 pg OPG per μg protein and 2.7 pg BMP-2 per μg protein, showed that there was no significant difference between the concentrations under the two conditions. Then, we encapsulated Sec into PLGA nanoparticles with loading capacity and efficiency at 3.3% and 84.2% respectively, showing successful encapsulation of Sec into the hydrophilic core of the PLGA nanoparticles. After that, MSC-Sec NPs were further coated with HMEC membranes with overexpressed CXCR4 to form stem cell-mimicking particles with osteoporosis targeting ability (MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP). First, we detected the expression level of CXCR4 on the surface of HMECs. Confocal imaging showed increased expression of CXCR4 after incubation with bFGF and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). We also checked whether hypoxia conditions of the cell culture had any effect on the expression level of CXCR4 and found no significant change in the level of CXCR4. Flow cytometry results were consistent with the confocal imaging results (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

The successful coating with HMEC membrane was first confirmed using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Fig. 1A). According to SEM results, the PLGA nanoparticles were around 300 nm before and after coating. However, we cannot identify the membrane after coating using SEM. We were able to see a hazy layer around the particles from TEM images, indicating the presence of membrane on the surface. In addition, western blots were performed to confirm the CXCR4 membrane coating (Fig. 1B). As with membrane alone, the membrane-coated particles were found to have a CXCR4 band. We also studied the size and zeta potential change before and after coating. As shown in Fig. 1C, the size of the nanoparticles showed a slight increase after HMEC membrane coating, while the zeta potential of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP changed from − 52 to − 29 mV (Fig. 1D). The stability of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP in 10% serum showed no obvious change for the duration of one week-incubation, indicating the stability of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP and their potential for further application (Fig. 1E). In contrast, MSC-Sec NP without membrane coating increased in size owing to agglomeration. Finally, the Sec release behavior of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP was investigated and we found they could sustain the release of growth factors OPG and BMP-2 for about two weeks (Fig. 1F). This sustained release is promising for osteoporosis treatment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Fabrication and characterization of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP. A SEM and TEM images before and after cell membrane coating. B Western blot analysis detecting CXCR4 on MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP. C Hydrodynamic diameter and D zeta potential of particles before and after membrane coating. E The stability of MSC-Sec NP and MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP after storage in 50% fetal bovine serum at room temperature for days. F Quantitative analyses on the release of OPG and BMP-2 at different time points

Full size image

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs inhibit receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B Ligand (RANKL)

Osteoblastic RANKL promotes differentiation by triggering RANKL reverse signaling, which activates runt-related transcription factor 2 [33]. Cultures supplemented with recombinant RANKL have been widely used to promote macrophage osteoclast differentiation. We first isolated rat bone marrow macrophages (rBMMs) and induced osteoclast formation by supplementing with recombinant RANKL with or without our MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs. We found that introduction of 104 MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP resulted in macrophage differentiation into atypical osteoclasts, and 106 MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP successfully inhibited RANKL-induced macrophage osteoclast differentiation altogether, indicating that MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP have an inhibiting effect on osteoclast formation (Additional file 1: Fig. S2).

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs promote the proliferation of MSCs and osteoblasts

Bone formation needs to recruit a sufficient number and activity of osteoblasts. In addition, MSCs aid in fracture healing by properly proliferating, differentiating, and, consequently, forming bone. Thus, the proliferation of the two kinds of cells plays an important role for the treatment of osteoporosis. To test the ability of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs to promote proliferation in vitro, MSCs and osteoblasts were co-cultured with MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs in different concentrations. As shown in Fig. 2A, B, MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs significantly promote the proliferation of MSCs and osteoblasts with concentration-dependent effects owing to the sustained release of Sec. As alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is an osteogenesis marker, we then measured ALP activity and found enhanced osteogenesis differentiation with enhanced concentrations of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs (Fig. 2C, E). The formation of mineralized matrix nodules is a marker for late stages of osteogenesis; we also measured the matrix nodules of the MSCs after incubating with MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs for 2 weeks using the Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining assay. The results were consistent with Fig. 2C in that more matrix nodules were formed when treated by higher concentrations of particles (Fig. 2D, F).

Fig. 2
figure 2

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP inhibits osteoclast differentiation and promotes osteogenic proliferation. Cell proliferation for A MSCs and B osteoblasts that were incubated with different numbers of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs. C ALP activity and D Alizarin Red S staining of primary MSCs after incubating with different concentrations of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs for 2 weeks. Scale bar, 1 mm. Quantifying E relative ALP activity and F the amount of Alizarin Red S that stained the mineralized matrix. *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001

Full size image

CXCR4 mediated MSC-Sec NPs targeting to bone of ovariectomized (OVX) rats

Previous studies have indicated that both CXCR4 positive cells and CXCR4-incorporated particles have homing-related responses to the SDF-1 gradient, which is highly secreted during ischemia, inflammation, or osteoporosis. To test the osteoporosis-targeting ability of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs in vivo, an osteoporosis rat model was constructed by ovariectomy (OVX). We monitored the biodistribution of rhodamine B (RhB)-labelled MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs and bare MSC-Sec NPs at different time points in OVX rats. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, more RhB@MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs accumulated in the femur on day 3 and remained as long as day 5, indicating the bone-targeting ability of CXCR4 membrane-incorporated particles. In contrast, MSC-Sec NPs alone resulted in a slight accumulation in the femur. In addition, more RhB@MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs were detected in bone than bare MSC-Sec NPs, indicating the superior ability of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs respond to the SDF-1 gradient (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3
figure 3

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs targets the bone. A Biodistributions of rhodamine B-labelled MSC-Sec NPs with or without CXCR4 membrane coating after systemic administration in OVX rat at different time points. B Quantitative analysis of fluorescent intensities of femur and tibia at different time points post intravenous rhodamine B-labelled MSC-Sec NPs with or without CXCR4 membrane coating. C Confocal imaging of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs in massive bone at day 1 after infusion

Full size image

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs relieve bone mass attenuation in OVX rats

To study the therapeutic effects of injected MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs, we performed ex vivo micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) to detect proximal tibiae at 4- and 16-weeks post-treatment (Fig. 4A). The osteoporosis rat model induced by OVX was used for the animal study (Fig. 4B). CT images accurately showed bone microstructural parameters for quantitative assessments (Fig. 4C). As shown in Fig. 4D-G, we found increased bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone volume, and trabecular thickness in the MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs group compared to the OVX group (control group). In contrast, we found trabecular separation was reduced. Interestingly, compared with the MSC-Sec NPs treatment group, MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs induced higher trabecular bone volume, thickness, and number, which was comparable with the alendronate sodium (AS)-treated group owing to CXCR4 induced targeting effect. Consistent with Micro-CT results, we detected a significant increase in BMD in rats treated with MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs when compared to the OVX group or the MSC-Sec NPs group.

Fig. 4
figure 4

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs reduces OVX-induced osteoporosis in rats. A Schematic showing the design of in vivo experiments in rats with osteoporosis. B Photograph of OVX surgery to induce osteoporosis. C micro-CT images of distal femur after treating with different samples at 4 week and 16 weeks. Quantitative results of D BMD changes and some trabecular parameters, including trabecular bone volume expressed as percentage of E total tissue volume (BV/TV), F trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and G trabecular separation (Tb.Sp). n = 6 rats per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001

Full size image

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs promote bone formation and inhibit bone resorption

Percent changes in serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b (a marker of bone resorption) and osteocalcin (a specific biochemical parameter of bone formation) could estimate the therapeutic effect. Thus, we examined the concentration of TRACP-5b and osteocalcin in serum after different treatments using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs, AS, and MSC-Sec NP treatment markedly decreased serum levels of TRACP-5b at 4 weeks post treatment and up to 16 weeks post treatment (Fig. 5A). In addition, TRACP-5b level was lower in the MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs group compared to the MSC-Sec NPs group and showed comparable therapeutic efficiency to the AS treatment group. Furthermore, our tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining results were consistent with serum results that MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs reduced the TRAP level, indicating reduced osteoclast numbers (Fig. 5C, D). We also tested the osteocalcin to see the enhanced bone formation effect induced by MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs (Fig. 5B). Compared with the sham group, OVX passively promoted osteogenesis, which resulted in the slight increase of osteocalcin. In contrast, after 4 weeks post-treatment, osteocalcin level was significantly increased compared to pretreatment, and the MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs group showed the most efficiency. BMP-2 contributes to bone formation, and we found increased BMP-2 expression in MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs treated rats after targeted delivery of conditioned medium (Fig. 5E, F). In addition, H&E staining showed massive bone loss after OVX surgery. Injection of MSC-Sec NPs increased bone volume while treatment with CXCR4-MSC-Sec NPs further improved the outcomes (Fig. 5G). Taken together, these results indicate MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs could promote bone formation while inhibiting bone resorption, which then reverses osteoporosis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NPs therapy promotes bone formation and inhibits bone resorption. A Detection of serum TRACP-5b and B osteocalcin level after 4-week and 16-week treatment. C TRAP staining showing the osteoclasts. D Quantification of osteoclasts cells on the bone surface. E Detection of BMP-2 after 4-week and 16-week treatment and F their quantitative results. G Photomicrographs of bone sections stained by H&E. n = 6 rats per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001

Full size image

Conclusion

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition that generally requires sustained medical interventions to limit the risk of additional bone loss. Stem cells have been studied for osteoporosis treatment. Unlike traditional chemical drugs, stem cells are live drugs that can proliferate and differentiate in the living body, and thus only one dose is needed [34]. However, osteoporosis is a systemic disease and systemic intravenous injection poses the risk of inducing blood clots. In addition, stem cells are usually unstable, and hard to preserve and transport. Regardless, prior to clinical application, systemic studies on the effect of dose, bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics of stem cells need to be performed. Biomaterials or biomimetic materials have been widely developed for regenerative medicine owing to their stability, biocompatibility, and multifunctionality [35,36,37]. Synergizing the benefits of both stem cells and biomaterials, in this work, we fabricated a synthetic stem cell nanoparticle for osteoporosis treatment using CXCR4-expressing, membrane-coated, and secretome-loaded PLGA nanoparticles. The CXCR4/SDF-1 axis has been established to modulate stem cell migration to injured tissue. CXCR4-overexpressing membrane-coated particles for targeted delivery have been developed. For examples, Ma et al. reported neural stem cell membrane-coated PLGA for ischemic brain-targeted delivery and Luo et al. used engineered primary mouse thoracic aorta endothelial cell membrane and rapamycin-loaded nanoparticles for targeting and repairing cerebral ischemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury [38, 39].

We have confirmed that the stem cell secretome includes OPG and BMP-2, two important factors in osteoporosis therapy. Just like real stem cells, our MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP showed sustained and long-term (at least 14 days) release of OPG and BMP-2 (Fig. 1F) and 106 of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP inhibited osteoclast differentiation (Additional file 1: Fig. S2) while promoting osteogenesis (Fig. 2). The presence of CXCR4 on MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP ensures the synthetic nanoparticles’ mimicking of stem cell accumulation in the bone microenvironment due to their interaction with SDF-1 (Fig. 3).

Using micro-CT analysis, we found that injection of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP reduces OVX-induced bone mass attenuation in OVX rats. CXCR4 enhanced the accumulation of MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP and thus resulted in a higher concentration of OPG and BMP-2 in the bone microenvironment, which then efficiently promoted osteogenesis and inhibition of osteoclasts. As expected, fewer osteoclasts were found after MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP treatment (Fig. 5C) and there was an increased bone volume indicated by H&E staining (Fig. 5G). In addition, the level of TRACP-5b was lower and osteocalcin secreted solely by osteoblasts was higher in serum treated with MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP (Fig. 5A, B). Although MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP achieved a final therapeutic effect comparable to alendronate sodium, they can potentially avoid the side effects associated with alendronate sodium.

In conclusion, we have confirmed that synthetic stem cells have potential as a therapeutic drug in the treatment of chronic osteoporosis with sustained and long-term drug releasing behavior.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article.

References

  1. Yang TL, Shen H, Liu A, Dong SS, Zhang L, Deng FY, Zhao Q, Deng HW. A road map for understanding molecular and genetic determinants of osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16:91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun W, Ge K, Jin Y, Han Y, Zhang H, Zhou G, Yang X, Liu D, Liu H, Liang X, Zhang J. Bone-targeted nanoplatform combining zoledronate and photothermal therapy to treat breast cancer bone metastasis. ACS Nano. 2019;13(7):7556–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. He Y, Li Q, Ma C, Xie D, Li L, Zhao Y, Shan D, Chomos SK, Dong C, Tierney JW, Sun L, Lu D, Gui L, Yang J. Development of osteopromotive poly (octamethylene citrate glycerophosphate) for enhanced bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2019;93(15):180–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nayak S, Greenspan SL. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of bisphosphonate drug holidays on bone mineral density and osteoporotic fracture risk. Osteoporosis Int. 2019;30:705–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vargas-Franco JW, Castaneda B, Rédiní F, Gómez DF, Heymann D, Lézot F. Paradoxical side effects of bisphosphonates on the skeleton: What do we know and what can we do? J Cell Physiol. 2018;8(233):5696–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biggin A, Munns CF. Long-Term Bisphosphonate Therapy in Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2017;15:412–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng C, Chen J, Liu S, Jin Y. Stem cell-based bone and dental regeneration: a view of microenvironmental modulation. Int J Oral Sci. 2019;11:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shang F, Yu Y, Liu S, Ming L, Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Zhao J, Jin Y. Advancing application of mesenchymal stem cell-based bone tissue regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(3):666–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aghebati-Maleki L, Dolati S, Zandi R, Fotouhi A, Ahmadi M, Aghebati A, Nouri M, Kazem Shakouri S, Yousefi M. Prospect of mesenchymal stem cells in therapy of osteoporosis: a review. J Cell Physiol. 2019;6(234):8570–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Phetfong J, Sanvoranart T, Nartprayut K, Nimsanor N, Seenprachawong K, Prachayasittikul V, Supokawej A. Osteoporosis: the current status of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2016;21:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma C, Tian X, Kim J, Xie PD, Ao X, Shan D, Lin Q, Hudock MR, Bai X, Yang J. Citrate-based materials fuel human stem cells by metabonegenic regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(50):E11741–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang Y, Kim S, Fahrenholtz M, Khademhosseini A, Yang Y. Osteogenic and angiogenic potentials of monocultured and co-cultured human-bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and human-umbilical-vein endothelial cells on three-dimensional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold. Acta Biomater. 2013;1(9):4906–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SH. The advantages and limitations of mesenchymal stem cells in clinical application for treating human diseases. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2018;4(4):150–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Z, Wang Z, Dinh P-UC, Zhu D, Popowski KD, Lutz H, Hu S, Lewis MG, Cook A, Andersen H, Greenhouse J, Pessaint L, Lobo LJ, Cheng K. Cell-mimicking nanodecoys neutralize SARS-CoV-2 and mitigate lung injury in a non-human primate model of COVID-19. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16:942–951.

  15. Schlosser S, Dennler C, Schweizer R, Eberli D, Stein JV, Enzmann V, Giovanoli P, Erni D. Plock JA Paracrine effects of mesenchymal stem cells enhance vascular regeneration in ischemic murine skin. Microvasc Res. 2012;3(83):267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang G, Chen Q, Wen D, Chen Z, Wang J, Chen G, Wang Z, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Hu Q, Zhang L, Gu Z. A therapeutic microneedle patch made from hair-derived keratin for promoting hair regrowth. ACS Nano. 2019;13(4):4354–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang K, Hu S, Cheng K. A new era of cardiac cell therapy: opportunities and challenges. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:1801011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu F, Hu S, Yang H, Li Z, Huang K, Su T, Wang S, Cheng K. Hyaluronic acid hydrogel integrated with mesenchymal stem cell-secretome to treat endometrial injury in a rat model of Asherman’s syndrome. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:1900411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tachibana A, Santoso MR, Mahmoudi M, Shukla P, Wang L, Bennett M, Goldstone AB, Wang M, Fukushi M, Ebert AD, Woo YJ, Rulifson E, Yang PC. Paracrine effects of the pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes salvage the injured myocardium. Circ Res. 2017;6(121):e22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gnecchi M, Zhang Z, Ni A, Dzau VJ. Paracrine mechanisms in adult stem cell signaling and therapy. Circ Res. 2008;11(103):1204–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Su T, Huang K, Ma H, Liang H, Dinh PU, Chen J, Shen D, Allen TA, Qiao L, Li Z, Hu S, Cores J, Frame BN, Young AT, Yin Q, Liu J, Qian L, Caranasos TG, Brudno Y, Ligler FS, Cheng K. Platelet-inspired nanocells for targeted heart repair after ischemia/reperfusion injury. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;4(29):1803567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang H, Huang K, Su T, Li Z, Hu S, Dinh PU, Wrona EA, Shao C, Qiao L, Vandergriff AC, Hensley MT, Cores J, Allen T, Zhang H, Zeng Q, Xing J, Freytes DO, Shen D, Yu Z, Cheng K. Mesenchymal stem cell/red blood cell-inspired nanoparticle therapy in mice with carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver failure. ACS Nano. 2018;7(12):6536–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tang J, Shen D, Caranasos TG, Wang Z, Vandergriff AC, Allen TA, Hensley MT, Dinh PU, Cores J, Li TS, Zhang J, Kan Q, Cheng K. Therapeutic microparticles functionalized with biomimetic cardiac stem cell membranes and secretome. Nat Commmun. 2017;8:13724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Luo L, Tang J, Nishi K, Yan C, Dinh PU, Cores J, Kudo T, Zhang J, Li TS, Cheng K. Fabrication of synthetic mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in mice. Circ Res. 2017;11(120):1768–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shen M, Wu R, Jin R, Pan J, Guo F, Li Z, Lin X, Xu S. Injection of synthetic mesenchymal stem cell mitigates osteoporosis in rats after ovariectomy. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;8(22):3751–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Q, Zheng C, Li Y, Bian S, Pan H, Zhao X, Lu WW. Bone Targeted Delivery of SDF-1 via alendronate functionalized nanoparticles in guiding stem cell migration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:23700–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lapidot T, Kollet O. The essential roles of the chemokine SDF-1 and its receptor CXCR4 in human stem cell homing and repopulation of transplanted immune-deficient NOD/SCID and NOD/SCID/B2mnull mice. Leukemia. 2002;16:1992–2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wynn RF, Hart CA, Corradi-Perini C, O'Neill, Evans CA, Wraith JE, Fairbairn LJ, Bellantuono I. A small proportion of mesenchymal stem cells strongly expresses functionally active CXCR4 receptor capable of promoting migration to bone marrow. Blood 2004;104(9):2643–2645.

  29. Hoggatt J, Singh P, Sampath J, Pelus LM. Prostaglandin E2 enhances hematopoietic stem cell homing, survival, and proliferation. Blood. 2009;113(22):5444–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Catalano A, Loddo S, Bellone F, Pecora C, Lasco A, Morabito N. Pulsed electromagnetic fields modulate bone metabolism via RANKL/OPG and Wnt/β-catenin pathways in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A pilot study. Bone. 2018;116:42–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang TB, Li YZ, Yu K, Yu Z, Wang Y, Jiang ZW, Wang HM, Yang GL. Effect of the Wnt signal-RANKL/OPG axis on the enhanced osteogenic integration of a lithium incorporated surface. Biomater Sci. 2019;7:1101–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu C, Xiao L, Cao Y, He Y, Lei C, Xiao Y, Sun W, Ahadian S, Zhou X, Khademhosseini A, Ye Q. Mesoporous silica rods with cone shaped pores modulate inflammation and deliver BMP-2 for bone regeneration. Nano Res. 2020;13:2323–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao X. RANKL-RANK signaling regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Bone Res. 2018;6:35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Su T, Huang K, Daniele MA, Hensley MT, Young AT, Tang J, Allen TA, Vandergriff AC, Erb PD, Ligler FS, Cheng K. Cardiac stem cell patch integrated with microengineered blood vessels promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and neovascularization after acute myocardial infarction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:33088–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li Z, Hu S, Cheng K. Platelets and their biomimetics for regenerative medicine and cancer therapies. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:7354–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tang J, Vandergriff A, Wang Z, Hensley MT, Cores J, Allen TA, Dinh PU, Zhang J, Caranasos TG, Cheng K. A regenerative cardiac patch formed by spray painting of biomaterials onto the heart. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23:146–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Mihalko E, Huang K, Sproul E, Cheng K, Brown AC. Targeted treatment of ischemic and fibrotic complications of myocardial infarction using a dual-delivery microgel therapeutic. ACS Nano. 2018;12:7826–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma J, Zhang S, Liu J, Liu F, Du F, Li M, Chen AT, Bao Y, Suh HW, Avery J, Deng G, Zhou Y, Wu P, Sheth K, Wang H, Zhou J. Targeted drug delivery to stroke via chemotactic recruitment of nanoparticles coated with membrane of engineered neural stem cells. Small. 2019;15:1902011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luo L, Zang G, Liu B, Qin X, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhang H, Wu W, Wang G. Bioengineering CXCR4-overexpressing cell membrane functionalized ROS-responsive nanotherapeutics for targeting cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Theranostics. 2021;11:8043–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

B. Zhong, K. Cheng, W. Xu, C. Zhang, and W. Zhang designed the overall experiments. C. Zhang, W. Zhang, D. Zhu, Z. Li, Z. Wang, J. Li, X. Mei W. Xu, and B. Zhong performed the experiments and analyzed the data. K. Cheng, C. Zhang, and D. Zhu wrote the article. All authors read and approved the final article. All authors have provided the corresponding author with written permission to be named in the article. This work was supported by NC State University College of Veterinary Medicine. Project is also sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81772426 to B. Zhong, 81974330 to C. Zhang, 81501897 to W. Xu) and Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (No. 20ZR1451800 to W. Xu).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chi Zhang, Wei Zhang and Dashuai Zhu contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, China

    Chi Zhang, Wei Zhang & Biao Zhong

  2. Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Chi Zhang, Dashuai Zhu, Zhenhua Li, Zhenzhen Wang, Junlang Li, Xuan Mei & Ke Cheng

  3. Department of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1111 XianXia Road, Shanghai, 200336, China

    Wei Xu

Authors
  1. Chi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dashuai Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhenhua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhenzhen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Junlang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xuan Mei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ke Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Biao Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wei Xu, Ke Cheng or Biao Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Table S1. Quantitative results of OPG and BMP-2 in MSC conditioned medium. Fig. S1. Representative confocal fluorescent images showing CXCR4-positive HMEC and flow cytometry analysis. Fig. S2. Images taken from isolated rat bone marrow macrophages (rBMMs) after induced differentiation into osteoclasts by RANKL in the presence of PBS, 104 MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP or 106 MSC-Sec/CXCR4 NP.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Zhang, W., Zhu, D. et al. Nanoparticles functionalized with stem cell secretome and CXCR4-overexpressing endothelial membrane for targeted osteoporosis therapy. J Nanobiotechnol 20, 35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01231-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01231-6

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us