Skip to main content

Table 2 Merits and Demerits of Different Methods for Isolating FNRBCs

From: Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis targeting fetal nucleated red blood cells

Technology

Key Features

Merits

Demerits

References

Conventional

Cell size;

Simple;

Low capture rate;

[32]

Cell density;

Low-cost to operate

Low purity;

 

Surface antigen

 

Low vitality;

 

 DGC

Cell density

Simple;

Low purity;

[33]

 

Low-cost to operate

Pretreatment method

 

 FACS

Surface antigen;

Fast;

Expensive;

[34]

Fluorescent fuels;

High purity;

High requirements

 

Flow cytometry

Sort multiple cells Simultaneously

  

 MACS

Surface antigen;

Convenient;

Low purity;

[56]

Magnetic bead;

Less costly;

Not sorting multiple cells

 

Magnetic Fields

Wide application

  

 Affinity lectin separation

Galactose residue;

Low cost;

Low purity

[44]

SBA

Simple;

  
 

High capture rate

  

 Microscope operation

Morphology of stained cells

Convenient;

Expensive;

[60]

 

For single-cell sorting

High demanding

 

Novel

Micro-/nanomaterials;

High sensitivity;

Few clinical applications

[64]

High throughput;

High capture rate;

  

Miniaturization

High purity;

  
 

High vitality

  

 Microfiltration chips

Cell size;

Not require biomarkers;

Cell clogging;

[85]

Cell deformability

Simple to operate;

Low purity;

 
 

High throughput

Low vitality

 

 DLD microchips

Cell size;

Not require biomarkers;

Large blood samples;

[91]

Displacements and directions;

Simple to operate;

Cell clogging;

 
 

High capture rate;

Low purity

 

 DEP microchips

Dielectric properties;

Simple to operate;

Electrodes easily electrolyze;

[92]

Inhomogeneous electric field;

For single-cell sorting

Generate some air bubbles;

 

Displacements and directions

 

Long sorting time

 

 Acoustic chips

Cell size;

Non-contact manipulability;

Demanding equipment;

[130]

Acoustic contrast factors

High biocompatibility;

Complex sorting

 
 

Gentleness

  

 Droplet chips

Incompatible multiphase fluids;

Miniaturization;

High cost;

[144]

Micro-valve control;

Confinement;

Few clinical application

 

Micro-sized droplets

Parallelism

  

 Immunoaffinity microchips

Surface antigen;

High capture rate;

Few clinical applications

[150,151,152]

Immunoaffinity

High purity;

  
 

High vitality

  

 Static nano-substrates

Surface antigen;

Easy to operate;

Non-specific cells adhesion

[30, 39, 154, 173]

Immunoaffinity;

High capture rate

  

Nanomaterials;

   

Nanomembranes

   

 Dynamic nano-substrates

Surface antigen;

Reduce WBCs adhesion;

Microbeads easily cluster

[14, 28, 38, 170]

Immunoaffinity;

Simple and low cost;

  

Magnetic beads

High throughput

 Â