Determination of pore size distribution at the cell-hydrogel interface
© Leal-Egaña et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 20 February 2011
Accepted: 27 May 2011
Published: 27 May 2011
Analyses of the pore size distribution in 3D matrices such as the cell-hydrogel interface are very useful when studying changes and modifications produced as a result of cellular growth and proliferation within the matrix, as pore size distribution plays an important role in the signaling and microenvironment stimuli imparted to the cells. However, the majority of the methods for the assessment of the porosity in biomaterials are not suitable to give quantitative information about the textural properties of these nano-interfaces.
Here, we report a methodology for determining pore size distribution at the cell-hydrogel interface, and the depth of the matrix modified by cell growth by entrapped HepG2 cells in microcapsules made of 0.8% and 1.4% w/v alginate. The method is based on the estimation of the shortest distance between two points of the fibril-like network hydrogel structures using image analysis of TEM pictures. Values of pore size distribution determined using the presented method and those obtained by nitrogen physisorption measurements were compared, showing good agreement. A combination of these methodologies and a study of the cell-hydrogel interface at various cell culture times showed that after three days of culture, HepG2 cells growing in hydrogels composed of 0.8% w/v alginate had more coarse of pores at depths up to 40 nm inwards (a phenomenon most notable in the first 20 nm from the interface). This coarsening phenomenon was weakly observed in the case of cells cultured in hydrogels composed of 1.4% w/v alginate.
The method purposed in this paper allows us to obtain information about the radial deformation of the hydrogel matrix due to cell growth, and the consequent modification of the pore size distribution pattern surrounding the cells, which are extremely important for a wide spectrum of biotechnological, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications.
Alginate is a natural polysaccharide, which forms stable three-dimensional (3D) hydrogels upon binding divalent cations such as Ca2+, Sr2+ or Ba2+. Due to the high immune compatibility, the use of alginate to entrap cells has been widely studied with the purpose of entrapping immortalized and/or transformed cells which could replace malfunctioning tissues of a diseased organ . Besides, alginate microcapsules can be used to test the action of anticancer drugs on malignant cells embedded in a 3D environment (tumour-like microcapsules) .
Owing to the enhanced proliferation capacity of immortalized and/or cancer cells, the analysis of modifications of the interface between cell and biomaterial with cell growth is highly desirable. Some methods to characterize the porous structure of the 3D networks have been previously reported, such as mercury intrusion porosimetry , nitrogen physisorption , and the diffusion kinetics of relevant solutes . Nevertheless, these techniques cannot be applied in the presence of cells, nor do they give information about modifications produced at the cell-biomaterial interface due to cell proliferation.
Owing to the feasibility of obtaining and analyzing high resolution electron microscope images of cryofixed cells embedded in 3D matrices, it is one of the most widely used techniques to analyze textural properties of hydrogels, offering the advantage of simultaneously obtaining information pertaining to both the cells and the material comprising the matrix . Since hydrogels are most commonly formed by networks of randomly interconnected polymers, they form complex microarchitectures of cavities with variable shapes and morphologies. Even though well-defined pore-like structures can be clearly observed with scanning electron microscopy , we need to consider other approaches for extracting accurate quantitative three dimensional information of the hydrogel matrix from measurements made in two dimensions.
In this paper we describe a methodology based on automated image processing and analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images obtained from hydrogels, and its applicability on determining modifications of the pore size distribution at the cell-alginate interface as a result of cell growth.
The method was performed after entrapping the hepatocarcinoma cell line HepG2, which represents an example of cells with enhanced proliferative capacity.
Material and methods
Electron microscopy images
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images were obtained with an Electron Microscope (Carl Zeiss EM 10, Germany) according to methods published previously . Briefly, the method is based on the fixation of alginate microcapsules with a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (Serva, Germany) dissolved in a buffer solution composed of 9 g/l NaCl (Carl Roth, Germany), 5.55 g/l CaCl2 (Merck, Germany) and 10.46 g/l of Mops buffer (Carl Roth, Germany). After overnight fixation (4°C), alginate microcapsules were saturated with 2.0% (w/v) agarose (Carl Roth, Germany), and fixed again with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4°C for 1 h. Capsules were rinsed three times for 20 min with the buffer solution. Post-fixation was performed by using 1.0% osmium tetroxide (Merck, Germany) at 4°C (2 × 1h), and posterior embedded in Durcupan (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Serva, Germany) .
The total number of TEM pictures obtained was 72, assuming a random distribution of cells within the alginate capsules.
Textural properties of cell-free alginate microcapsules 
Measurements were carried out after drying the microcapsules in CO2 beyond the critical point. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were collected using a Micromeritics ASAP2010 gas adsorption analyzer at 77K, after degassing the samples at 298K overnight on a vacuum line. The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) specific surface area was evaluated using adsorption data in a relative pressure range, 0.05 to 0.2 . Alginate matrix pore size distribution was calculated on the basis of the desorption branches using the Barret-Joyner-Halenda method (BJH) .
HepG2 cells (obtained from the departmental cell bank of the Stem Cell Biology laboratory, University of Leipzig, Germany) were cultivated in DMEM (Biochrom, Germany) supplemented with 15% v/v foetal bovine serum (GIBCO, Scotland), 100 ng/ml sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 50µg/ml Gentamycin (PAA laboratories, Austria).
HepG2 cells were immobilized in 0.8% and 1.4% w/v alginate-CaCl2 microcapsules of 500µm diameter according to methods described previously [4, 8]. A commercially available encapsulation system (Innotech, IE-50R) with a 250µm nozzle was used. This system produces capsules with a diameter of up to 500µm. In all cases, the initial number of immobilized HepG2 per mL alginate was 1.5·106 (approximately 100 cells per capsule). The viability of the immobilized cells before the process of encapsulation was determined by the Tripan Blue exclusion method (Sigma-Aldrich, UK), where the viability of HepG2 reached 95%.
Determination of cell and/or aggregates sizes
Analysis of cells and/or aggregates radii was carried out by using the program Axiovision (Carl Zeiss, Germany) after images capture of cells and/or aggregates with an Axiovert HRC camera (Carl Zeiss, Germany) mounted on an inverted microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 200). Analyses of size distribution were carried out with a minimum number of 200 capsules, which were placed in a 4 well plate containing 500 μL media, 0.05% v/v concentration of Calcein A/M (Invitrogen, USA) and 0.25% v/v of Ethidium homodimer I (Invitrogen, USA).
Automated analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was accomplished using the following protocol: firstly, relatively high image-inherent contrast basically makes automatic image segmentation (alginate vs. cavities) straightforward by applying binarization using a simple thresholding, however, preprocessing is required in order to compensate for local contrast fluctuations, so that image inhomogeneity correction using a high-pass filter  was applied. Image noise was removed doing a preserving edge-smoothing using total variation filtering . Additionally, coherence-enhancing shock filtering  was done to further intensify all directed alginate structures. Pre-processed TEM images were then partitioned into alginate and cavity segments using binarization. The minimum accepted lumen area was set to approx. 275nm². Measurements of these binary images were performed using an unsigned Euclidean image distance transformation  providing for all background pixels a respective shortest distance to the surrounding alginate, thereby obtaining values of relative radii of these cavities. The number of times the same value was repeated is hereafter dubbed the frequency. All distance transformation-based measurements were accomplished along the skeleton between two opposite alginate fibrils. Discrete values of radii of the alginate cavities are named in this paper as relative pore radius (rpr). For images obtained after cell entrapment, we carried out the protocol described above, followed by correlating measurements of relative pore radii to the perpendicular distance from the interface cell-biomaterial, assuming a maximum distance of 400 nm. This was carried out by delineating the cell contour to generate a mask, which was used as a starting point for measurements, again accomplished based on a computational effective Euclidean distance transform. In order to obtain a distribution of values in percent, rpr between 10 and 70 nm were grouped in a discrete cluster. All image processing was accomplished using the computer algebra system MATHEMATICA® (Wolfram Research, Inc., Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA) including the Digital Image package written by Jens-Peer Kuska.
Similar to the measurements of relative pore's radii, after treatment of the images with the procedures described previously, measurements of diameters of the alginate fibrils were carried out by measuring the distance transform masked out along a fibril skeleton. The precision of our method depends of the image resolution, where in case of the pictures used in this paper (obtained with an amplification of 20000X), 1 pixel represents 2.34 nm².
Results and Discussion
Comparison of values of relative pore radius (rpr) determined by N2 adsorption-desorption and image analyses in cell-free microcapsules made of 0.8% and 1.4% w/v alginate
Range rpr (nm)
0.8% w/v Alginate
1.4% w/v Alginate
Image analysis (%)
Image analysis (%)
rpr ≤ 10
48.9 ± 1.3
49.4 ± 2.3
59.8 ± 1.5
62.8 ± 1.8
10 < rpr < 20
15.4 ± 1.1
16.7 ± 2.3
16.1 ± 1.2
19.9 ± 1.1
20 < rpr < 25
13.3 ± 1.0
11.1 ± 2.2
8.9 ± 1.0
9.4 ± 1.6
25 < rpr < 40
11.3 ± 0.8
9.3 ± 1.9
8.8 ± 0.7
4.7 ± 0.4
40 < rpr < 70
9.0 ± 0.5
11.0 ± 0.7
5.3 ± 0.5
2.9 ± 0.3
70 < rpr
2.2 ± 0.3
3.0 ± 0.3
1.1 ± 0.2
1.0 ± 0.2
Comparison of values of fibril-like radii (flr) determined by image analyses in alginate microcapsules made of 0.8% and 1.4% w/v alginate
0.8% w/v Alginate(%)
1.4% w/v Alginate(%)
flr ≤ 2.34
48.7 ± 2.8
30.3 ± 2.4
2.34 < flr < 4.68
48.9 ± 3.2
64.0 ± 3.1
4.68 < flr < 7.02
2.3 ± 0.3
5.5 ± 0.5
7.02 < flr < 9.36
0.1 ± 0.01
0.3 ± 0.1
9.36 < flr
0.0 ± 0.0
0.0 ± 0.0
It is important to note that although the hydrogel matrix allows easy diffusion of several nutrients with small molecular weight (e.g. glucose, oxygen), the presence of a high population of pores smaller of 10 nm could restrict the diffusion of some proteins, such as albumin and/or hemoglobin (Stokes radius of 3.1-3.5 nm and 2.4 nm respectively) .
It is important to remark that the sensitivity of our method relies on the micrograph image resolution. Thus, the use of image analysis becomes a powerful strategy for the analysis of meso- and nano- porous materials, presenting clear advantages to other strategies for characterization of textural properties of hydrogels.
Measurements of rp sizes and frequency were carried out on days 0, 3 and 6, in a similar manner to the determinations performed in cell-free hydrogels. These values were correlated with a third parameter measured perpendicularly inwards from the alginate matrix to the cell. This analysis allows us to quantify the extension (depth) to which the cells can modify the material matrix in terms of pore size distribution.
The higher resistance of the more highly concentrated hydrogel to mechanical deformation can be explained by increases in both the percentage of pores smaller than 10 nm, and the thickness of the alginate fibril-like structures, due to increased crosslinking of alginate polymer.
According to recent publications, immobilized cells within alginate hydrogels are submitted to compression forces which lead single cells to generate cellular microspheroids . Thus, analyses of radial deformation of the alginate matrix due to cell growth and the consequent modification of the pore size distribution pattern can give us very important information about modulation of rates of molecular diffusion of nutrients/waste products, information which is not only extremely useful for biomedical applications , but also for studying the development of primary tumours in tumor-like microcapsules [2, 19], as mentioned previously.
It is important to mention that methods for cell fixation can slightly diminish cell size, and therefore a short distance between cells and the material interface can be observed in several cases. Nevertheless, as shown in Figures 1 and 4, this does not affect the pore size distribution and the textural properties of the matrix material, ensuring the reliability of our method. As a final remark, it is important to note that although our methodology has been not tested with other polymers, because it is based on image analysis of TEM pictures, studies of modifications of the cell-hydrogel interface may be possible in different types of hydrogels which maintain their textural properties after fixation.
The authors thank Dr. John Hardy and Eileen Lintz for proof-reading and constructive criticism during the preparation of this manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Spanish Government, Department of Science and Innovation, MICINN (Plan Nacional BIO2009-13903-C02-02). Aldo Leal-Egaña is grateful for the financial support by a grant from the German Academic Exchange Service (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst). Ulf-Dietrich Braumann is grateful for the long and fruitful cooperation with Dr. Jens-Peer Kuska who died in 2009 at the young age of 45.
- Sgroi A, Mai G, Morel P, Baertschiger RM, Gonelle-Gispert C, Serre-Beinier V, Buhler LH: Transplantation of encapsulated hepatocytes during acute liver failure improves survival without stimulating native liver regeneration. Cell Transplant. 2011,Google Scholar
- Yu L, Chen M, Cheung K: Droplet-based microfluidic system for multicellular tumor spheroid formation and anticancer drug testing. Lab Chip. 2010, 10: 2424-2432. 10.1039/c004590j.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vay K, Scheler S, Friess W: New insights into the pore structure of poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres. Int J Pharm. 2010, 402: 20-6. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.09.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leal-Egaña A, Díaz-Cuenca A, Bader A: Determination of the decay rate constant for hepatocytes immobilized in alginate microcapsules. J Microencapsul. 2010, 27: 86-93. 10.3109/02652040903050550.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gautier A, Carpentier B, Dufresne M, Vu Dinh Q, Paullier P, Legallais C: Impact of alginate type and bead diameter on mass transfers and the metabolic activities of encapsulated C•A cells in bioartificial liver applications. European Cells and Materials. 2011, 21: 94-106.Google Scholar
- Guilherme M, Fajardo A, Moia T, Kunita M, Gonçalves M, Rubira A, Tambourgi E: Porous nanocomposite hydrogel of vinyled montmorillonite-crosslinked maltodextrin-co-dimethylacrylamide as a highly stable polymer carrier for controlled release systems. Eur Polymer J. 2010, 46: 1465-1474. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.04.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seck T, Melchels F, Feijen J, Grijpma D: Designed biodegradable hydrogel structures prepared by stereolithography using poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(d,l-lactide)-based resins. J Control Release. 2010, 148: 34-41. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leal-Egaña A, Heinrich JM, Smith M, Nowicki M, Bader A: A simple non-destructive method for the fixation and immunostaining of cultured cells encapsulated in alginate. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2006, 44: 143-150. 10.1042/BA20050175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rouquerol F, Rouquerol J, Sing K: Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. 1999, London, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Sing K, Williams R: Empirical Procedures for the Analysis of Physisoption Isotherms. Adsorption Science and Technology. 2005, 23: 839-853. 10.1260/026361705777641990.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez R, Woods R: Digital Image Processing. 2008, New Jersey: Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
- Chan T, Osher S, Shen J: The digital TV filter and nonlinear denoising. T Image Process. 2001, IEEE, 10: 231-241. 10.1109/83.902288.Google Scholar
- Weickert J: Coherence-enhancing shock filters. LNCS. 2003, 2781: 1-8.Google Scholar
- Saito T, Toriwaki J: New algorithms for n-dimensional Euclidean distance transformation. Pattern Recogn. 1994, 27: 1551-1565. 10.1016/0031-3203(94)90133-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sing K, Williams R: Physisorption hysteresis loops and the characterization of nanoporous materials. Adsorpt Sci Technol. 2004, 22: 773-782. 10.1260/0263617053499032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ralla K, Sohling U, Riechers D, Kasper C, Ruf F, Scheper T: Adsorption and separation of proteins by a smectitic clay mineral. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2010, 33: 847-861. 10.1007/s00449-010-0408-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gevertz J, Gillies G, Torquato S: Simulating tumor growth in confined heterogeneous environments. Phys Biol. 2008, 5: 036010-10.1088/1478-3975/5/3/036010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng G, Tse J, Jain R, Munn L: Micro-environmental mechanical stress controls tumor spheroid size and morphology by suppressing proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. PLoS one. 2009, 4: e4632-10.1371/journal.pone.0004632.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hutmacher D: Biomaterials offer cancer research the third dimension. Nat Mater. 2010, 9: 90-93. 10.1038/nmat2619.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.