We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.
Simultaneous measurement of sensor-protein dynamics and motility of a single cell by on-chip microcultivation system
© Inoue et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
- Received: 07 December 2003
- Accepted: 30 April 2004
- Published: 30 April 2004
Measurement of the correlation between sensor-protein expression, motility and environmental change is important for understanding the adaptation process of cells during their change of generation. We have developed a novel assay exploiting the on-chip cultivation system, which enabled us to observe the change of the localization of expressed sensor-protein and the motility for generations. Localization of the aspartate sensitive sensor protein at two poles in Escherichia coli decreased quickly after the aspartate was added into the cultivation medium. However, it took more than three generations for recovering the localization after the removal of aspartate from the medium. Moreover, the tumbling frequency was strongly related to the localization of the sensor protein in a cell. The results indicate that the change of the spatial localization of sensor protein, which was inherited for more than three generations, may contribute to cells, motility as the inheritable information.
- Optical Tweezer
- Optical Trapping
- Sensor Protein
- Flagellar Motor
- Descendant Cell
Escherichia coli cells are able to respond to change in environmental chemo-effector concentrations through the reversal of their flagellar motors [1, 2]. Attractants (such as aspartate and serine) promote counterclockwise rotation of the flagella, resulting in smooth swimming, whereas repellents (such as phenol and Ni) promote clockwise rotation, resulting in tumbling. These responses are mediated by membrane-bound, methyl-accepting chemoreceptor proteins (MCPs). Immunoelectron microscopy revealed that MCP-CheW-CheA complexes are clustered in vivo, predominantly at the cell poles , and merely weaker lateral clusters were observed [4, 5]. It has been expected that the polar-localization changes according to environmental conditions, whereas there is no evidence showing the dynamics of localization-change have been reported. Conventional group-based experiments do not allow measuring the process of MCPs clustering and its change in consecutive generations in individual cells, which is essential to estimate the change occurring during the alternation of generations. In order to understand epigenetic processes such as adaptation and selection, both the protein-dynamics and the cell-dynamics of particular single cells should be observed continuously for generations.
Previously, we have developed the on-chip culture system exploiting the microfabrication technique and optical trapping [6–8]. The system enabled us to keep the condition around the cells constant by exchanging the fresh medium continuously and by controlling the cell number with optical trapping. Individual cells swimming in microchambers were observed with a spatial resolution of 0.2 μm by phase-contrast/fluorescence microscopy.
To measure the localization-dynamics of expressed proteins and the motility of single cells simultaneously, we used the on-chip microcultivation system and assayed intracellular proteins tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP). In this paper, we report the time course of the motility and the localization of the aspartate receptor protein (Tar) for several cell generations. We also report cellular responses caused by the addition and removal of the aspartate during cultivation.
When the cultivation started, the Tar-localization ratio (red square) was 2.5 and the tumbling-frequency (blue circle) was 0.5 (s-1) (Fig. 1B-a and Fig. 2a). After the 2nd cell division was occurred, minimal medium containing 1 mM aspartate was given to the 3rd generation of cell (135 min after microcultivation). After adding the attractant, tumbling-frequency was decreased immediately compared to the previous generation. Localization of the aspartate sensitive sensor protein at two poles in Escherichia coli also decreased quickly by half 45 min following medium change (Fig. 1B-b and Fig. 2b). Finally, after 80 min of stimulation by aspartate, localized Tar was diffused completely. Then, the aspartate was removed from the cultivation medium and cells were cultivated further to measure the recovery of Tar-locarization dynamics (Fig. 1B-c and Fig. 2c). After the first medium exchange, it took more than three generations to recover original pattern of Tar localization (Fig. 1B-d,1B-f, and Fig. 2d,2f). However, the frequency of tumbling remained higher than the former generations. This may indicate that the formation of Tar-localization requires more time than its diffusion. Such an asymmetric reversibility of protein localization may contribute to the inheritance of the cells' phenomenon caused by environmental change. It also suggests a possibility that change of Tar localization can be inherited by descendant cells and this can affect their motility and therefore their phenotype.
In conclusion, we reported the following two topics:
A novel assay for observing the protein-localization dynamics and the motility for generations was developed.
The decreasing and recovery of the Tar-localization in a living bacterium was monitored under environmental change.
This assay can potentially be used for measuring cell-dynamics and inheritance of those information from generation to generation with focusing each individual cell caused by the environmental change.
- Levit MN, Liu Y, Stock JB: Stimulus response coupling in bacterial chemotaxis: receptor dimers in signalling arrays. Molecular Microbiology. 1998, 30: 459-466. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01066.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manson MD, Armitage JP, Hoch JA, Macnab RM: Bacterial locomotion and signal transduction. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 1009-1022.Google Scholar
- Maddock JR, Shapiro L: Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. Science. 1993, 259: 1717-1723.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lybarger SR, Maddock JR: Clustering of the chemoreceptor complex in Escherichia coli is independent of the methyltransferase CheR and the methylesterase CheB. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 5527-5529.Google Scholar
- Skidmore JM, Ellefson DD, McNamara BP, Couto MM, Wolfe AJ, Maddock JR: Polar clustering of the chemoreceptor complex in Escherichia coli occurs in the absence of complete CheA function. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 967-973. 10.1128/JB.182.4.967-973.2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Inoue I, Wakamoto Y, Moriguchi H, Okano K, K. Yasuda: On-chip culture system for observation of isolated individual cells. Lab Chip. 2001, 1: 50-55. 10.1039/b103931h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakamoto Y, Inoue I, Moriguchi H, K. Yasuda: Analysis of single-cell differences using on-chip microculture system and optical trapping. Fresenius' J Anal Chem. 2001, 371: 276-281. 10.1007/s002160100999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Umehara S, Wakamoto Y, Inoue I, Yasuda K: On-chip single-cell microcultivation assay for monitoring environmental effects on isolated cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 305: 534-540. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00794-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mesibov R, Adler J: Chemotaxis toward amino acids in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1972, 112: 315-326.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.