Interaction of silver nanoparticles with HIV-1
© Elechiguerra et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 28 March 2005
Accepted: 29 June 2005
Published: 29 June 2005
The interaction of nanoparticles with biomolecules and microorganisms is an expanding field of research. Within this field, an area that has been largely unexplored is the interaction of metal nanoparticles with viruses. In this work, we demonstrate that silver nanoparticles undergo a size-dependent interaction with HIV-1, with nanoparticles exclusively in the range of 1–10 nm attached to the virus. The regular spatial arrangement of the attached nanoparticles, the center-to-center distance between nanoparticles, and the fact that the exposed sulfur-bearing residues of the glycoprotein knobs would be attractive sites for nanoparticle interaction suggest that silver nanoparticles interact with the HIV-1 virus via preferential binding to the gp120 glycoprotein knobs. Due to this interaction, silver nanoparticles inhibit the virus from binding to host cells, as demonstrated in vitro.
Nanotechnology provides the ability to engineer the properties of materials by controlling their size, and this has driven research toward a multitude of potential uses for nanomaterials. In the biological sciences, many applications for metal nanoparticles are being explored, including biosensors, labels for cells and biomolecules, and cancer therapeutics.
It has been demonstrated that, in the case of noble-metal nanocrystals, the electromagnetic, optical and catalytic properties are highly influenced by shape and size [5–7]. This has driven the development of synthesis routes that allow a better control of morphology and size [8–13]. Noble-metal nanomaterials have been synthesized using a variety of methods, including hard-template, bio-reduction and solution phase syntheses[8, 10–13].
Among noble-metal nanomaterials, silver nanoparticles have received considerable attention due to their attractive physicochemical properties. The surface plasmon resonance and large effective scattering cross section of individual silver nanoparticles make them ideal candidates for molecular labeling, where phenomena such as surface enhance Raman scattering (SERS) can be exploited. In addition, the strong toxicity that silver exhibits in various chemical forms to a wide range of microorganisms is very well known [16–18], and silver nanoparticles have recently been shown to be a promising antimicrobial material.
For these reasons, and based upon our previous work regarding interactions of noble metal nanoparticles with biomolecules, we decided to study the interaction of silver nanoparticles with viruses. Herein, we present the first findings of our investigation, the discovery that silver nanoparticles undergo size-dependent interaction with HIV-1.
Characterization of the tested silver nanoparticle preparations
The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles are strongly dependent upon their interactions with capping agent molecules. Indeed, the surface chemistry of the nanoparticles can modify their interactions with external systems. For this reason we tested silver nanoparticles with three markedly different surface chemistries: foamy carbon, poly (N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP), and bovine serum albumin (BSA).
PVP-coated nanoparticles were synthesized by the polyol method using glycerine as both reducing agent and solvent. In this method, a metal precursor is dissolved in a liquid polyol in the presence of a capping agent such as PVP. PVP is a linear polymer and stabilizes the nanoparticle surface via bonding with the pyrrolidone ring. Infrared (IR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies have revealed that both oxygen and nitrogen atoms of the pyrrolidone ring can promote the adsorption of PVP chains onto the surface of silver. The sample size distribution was obtained from high angle annular dark field (HAADF) images. The nanoparticles exhibited an average size of 6.53 nm with a standard deviation of 2.41 nm. (Figure 2d–e)
Silver nanoparticles directly conjugated to BSA protein molecules were synthesized in aqueous solution. Serum albumin is a globular protein, and is the most-abundant protein in blood plasma. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) is a single polypeptide chain composed of 583 amino acid residues . Several residues of BSA have sulfur-, oxygen-, and nitrogen-bearing groups that can stabilize the nanoparticle surface. The strongest interactions with silver likely involve the 35 thiol-bearing cysteine residues. By using sodium borohydride, a strong reducing agent, BSA stabilizes nanoparticles via direct bonding with these thiol-bearing cysteine residues, and provides steric protection due to the bulkiness of the protein. The sample size distribution was obtained from HAADF images. Nearly 75% of the BSA-conjugated silver nanoparticles were 2.08 ± 0.42 nm in diameter, but a substantial fraction of larger particles was also observed, bringing the total average to 3.12 ± 2.00 nm (Figure 2g–h).
UV-visible spectroscopy is a valuable tool for structural characterization of silver nanoparticles. It is well known that the optical absorption spectra of metal nanoparticles are dominated by surface plasmon resonances (SPR), which shift to longer wavelengths with increasing particle size . Also, it is well recognized that the absorbance of silver nanoparticles depends mainly upon size and shape [26, 27]. In general, the number of SPR peaks decrease as the symmetry of the nanoparticle increases . Recently, Schultz and coworkers correlated the absorption spectra of individual silver nanoparticles with their size (40–120 nm) and shape (spheres, decahedrons, triangular truncated pyramids and platelets) determined by TEM. They found that spherical and roughly spherical nanoparticles, decahedral or pentagonal nanoparticles, and triangular truncated pyramids and platelets absorb in the blue, green and red part of the spectrum, respectively. In all the cases the SPR peak wavelength increases with size, as expected.
The UV-Visible spectra for all the nanoparticle preparations are shown in Figure 2. All samples presented a minimum at ~320 nm that corresponds to the wavelength at which the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function of silver almost vanish . The sample with carbon-coated silver nanoparticles exhibits four peaks at ~400, ~490, ~560 and ~680 nm, as shown in Figure 2c. The optical signature of this sample can be better understood in terms of the distribution of sizes and shapes observed in the TEM. As we previously mentioned, the distribution of shapes in the sample is broad, and a significant amount of nanoparticles are not spherical such as multi-twinned with five-fold symmetries. The presence of nanoparticles with pentagonal and triangular cross-sections could be responsible for the absorption at longer wavelengths. Thus, it is clear that the characteristic absorption of these nanoparticles arises from the contribution of different shapes and sizes, which agrees with the TEM observations.
On the other hand, the PVP-coated and BSA-coated silver nanoparticles present only one peak at ~450 and ~390 nm, respectively. These results indicate that both preparations are mainly composed by small spherical silver nanoparticles. It is also well know that for small particles a broadening of the plasmon absorption bands is expected, since there is a linear dependence of the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) with the reciprocal of the particle diameter. The results for BSA-coated nanoparticles agree with the last statement, presenting just one broad symmetric peak at ~390 nm. On the other hand, the spectrum for the PVP-coated silver nanoparticles is not symmetric around the maximum absorption wavelength. In fact, this spectrum can be deconvoluted in two different curves, one centered at ~430 and another one at ~520 nm. The peak at ~430 nm could be assigned to the out-of-plane dipole resonance of the silver nanoparticles indicating the presence of spherical particles with small diameters. In addition, the synthesis of silver nanoparticles by the polyol method in presence of PVP promotes also the formation of multi-twinned nanoparticles (MTPs), being decahedra nanoparticles the most thermodynamically stable MTPs . Therefore, the observed read shift is a consequence of both nanoparticles of larger size and the presence of decahedral nanoparticles with pentagonal cross sections.
Interaction with HIV-1
High angle annular dark field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy was employed to study the interaction of silver nanoparticles with HIV-1. In our previous works, HAADF has proven to be a powerful technique for analysis of biological samples, such as proteins and bacteria, interfaced with inorganic nanoparticles. HAADF images are primarily formed by electrons that have undergone Rutherford backscattering. As a result, image contrast is related to differences in atomic number  with intensity varying as ~Z2. Therefore, image contrast is strongly related to composition. As a good approximation, lighter elements appear dark and heavier elements appear bright. Due to a large difference in atomic number, silver nanoparticles are easily distinguished from the organic matter that composes the virus.
Additionally, the nanoparticles seen in Figure 3a are not randomly attached to the virus, as regular spatial relationships are observed among groups of three particles. Both the spatial arrangement of nanoparticles and the size dependence of interaction can be explained in terms of the HIV-1 viral envelope, and can provide insight into the mode of interaction between the virus and nanoparticles.
The exterior of the HIV-1 virus is comprised of a lipid membrane interspersed with protruding glycoprotein knobs, formed by trimers consisting of two subunits: the gp120 surface glycoprotein subunit is exposed to the exterior, and the gp41 transmembrane glycoprotein subunit spans the viral membrane and connects the exterior gp120 glycoprotein with the interior p17 matrix protein. The main function of these protruding gp120 glycoprotein knobs is to bind with CD4 receptor sites on host cells. Numerous cellular proteins are also embedded within the viral envelope. However, the protruding gp120 glycoprotein knobs are more exposed to the exterior, and should be more accessible for potential nanoparticle interactions.
Leonard and coworkers reported that the gp120 subunit has nine disulfide bonds, three of which are located in the vicinity of the CD4 binding domain. These exposed disulfide bonds would be the most attractive sites for nanoparticles to interact with the virus. As mentioned previously, the nanoparticles in Figure 1a appear to be located at specific positions, with regular spatial relationships observed among groups of three particles. The observed spatial arrangements correlate with the positions of the gp120 glycoprotein knobs in the structural model for HIV-1 proposed by Nermut and coworkers.
Regular spatial relationships are also found on the surface of the untreated virus, as seen in the inset of Figure 1b. The observed darker contrast at these sites could indicate the locations of the glycoprotein knobs. As mentioned previously, contrast in HAADF images is strongly dependent on differences in atomic number. However, this is not the only factor in determining the image contrast. If the material is composed of elements of similar atomic numbers, as is the case for the organic constituents of the pure virus, local variations in sample density will provide noticeable contrast. The majority of the viral envelope consists of a densely-packed lipid membrane. However, for the glycoprotein knobs, we would expect a localized region of lower density due to the presence of membrane-spanning gp41 glycoproteins rather than the densely-packed lipids. Hence, these areas should appear darker than the rest of the viral envelope.
It has previously been determined that the center-to-center spacing between glycoprotein knobs is ~22 nm. In the inset of Figure 3a, the average measured center-to-center spacing between silver nanoparticles is ~28 nm, which correlates with the expected spacing between glycoprotein knobs. The average center-to-center spacing between the small darker regions on the untreated virus is ~22 nm, which again suggests these sites are the gp120 glycoprotein knobs. Thus, the observed spatial arrangement of nanoparticles, the center-to-center distance between nanoparticles, and the fact that the exposed sulfur-bearing residues of the glycoprotein knobs would be attractive sites for nanoparticle interaction strongly suggest that silver nanoparticles interact with the HIV-1 virus via preferential binding to the gp120 glycoprotein knobs.
Presuming that the most attractive sites for interaction are the sulfur-bearing residues of the gp120 glycoprotein knobs, there are only a limited number of bonds that a nanoparticle can form. This limited number of stabilizing sites can explain why larger nanoparticles are not observed to attach to the virus. Assuming that each nanoparticle interacts with a single glycoprotein knob, and that each nearest-neighbor knob is occupied by another nanoparticle, from geometric considerations the theoretical upper limit for the diameter for these nanoparticles would be ~20 nm. However, if a nanoparticle larger than the diameter of one knob (~14 nm) were to be attached, only a small fraction of the total nanoparticle surface would be anchored, resulting in a less stable interaction. Thus, if the nanoparticles are interacting with HIV-1 via preferential binding at gp120 glycoprotein knobs, we would expect to find mostly nanoparticles less than 14 nm in diameter, as particles in this size range would have the most stable surface interactions. This corresponds closely with our experimental observation that particles greater than 10 nm were not attached to the viral envelope.
Although the mechanism by which HIV infects host cells is not yet fully understood, there are two steps that are broadly agreed to be critical. The first step involves binding of gp120 to the CD4 receptor site on the host cell. Then, upon binding to CD4, a conformational change is induced in gp120, resulting in exposure of new binding sites for a chemokine receptor, i.e. CCR5 or CXCR4 [36–38]. An agent that preferentially interacts with the gp120 glycoprotein would block the virus from binding with host cells. Therefore, we measured the inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles against HIV-1 in vitro.
Although the findings regarding interaction with HIV-1 were congruent among nanoparticles with markedly different surface chemistry, the toxicity and inhibition results were not the same. The differences in the observed trends in HIV-1 inhibition can be explained in terms of the capping agents employed for each nanoparticle preparation. BSA- and PVP-protected nanoparticles exhibit slightly lower inhibition because the nanoparticle surface is directly bound to and encapsulated by the capping agent. In contrast, the silver nanoparticles released from the carbon matrix have a greater inhibitory effect due to their essentially free surface area. The fact that the carbon-coated nanoparticles present higher cytotoxicity can also be explained in terms of surface chemistry. Since a significant amount of these silver nanoparticles possess nearly free surfaces, they are able to interact stronger with the host cells, thus increasing their toxicity. Clearly, selection of capping agents will be crucial for future research on the interaction of nanoparticles with viruses, microorganisms, and more complex biosystems, and many more variables require further testing, including the long-term effects of the presence of nanoparticles, and the impact of traces of precursor molecules and reaction by-products.
In conclusion, we have found that silver nanoparticles undergo size-dependent interaction with HIV-1, and that the bound particles exhibit regular spatial relationships. These observations lead us to suggest that the nanoparticles undergo preferential binding with the gp120 subunit of the viral envelope glycoprotein. Silver nanoparticles inhibit the HIV-1 virus infectivity in vitro, which also supports our proposal regarding preferential interaction with gp120. These findings only provide indirect evidence for our proposed mode of interaction, and we are currently undertaking testing to determine conclusively if direct conjugation between gp120 and silver nanoparticles exist.
The interactions of inorganic nanoparticles with biosystems are just beginning to be understood, and potential applications are being discovered at an increasing rate. However, in order to realize the future promise of nanoscience, it is imperative that the toxicity and long-term health effects of exposure to nanomaterials be fully explored. The flexibility of nanoparticle preparation methods, the multitude of functionalization techniques, and facile incorporation of nanoparticles into a variety of media provide the incentive for further research on the interaction of metal nanoparticles with viruses.
a) HIV-1 strains and cell lines
HIV-1IIIB laboratory strain of HIV-1 an X4 wild type (wt) virus was obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH. CD4+ MT-2 cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The cMAGI HIV-1 reporter cells were a generous gift from Dr. Phalguni Gupta from the University of Pittsburgh. All other reagents used were of the highest quality available.
cMAGI cells were cultured in DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (1X) liquid without sodium phosphate and sodium pyruvate. The medium contained 4,500 mg/L D-glucose and L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 0.2 mg/mL geneticin (G418), and 0.1 μg/mL puromycin. MT-2 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640, containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics.
HIV-1IIIB primary clinical isolates were propagated by subculture in MT-2 and cMAGI cells. HIV-1IIIB was reproduced according to the DAIDS Virology Manual for HIV Laboratories, version 1997, compiled by Division of AIDS of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Health, and Collaborators. Aliquots of cell-free culture viral supernatants were used as viral inocula.
All the work related to HIV-1 cells, except for TEM analysis, was done in a Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) Laboratory.
b) Synthesis of the three different silver nanoparticle preparations
Carbon coated silver nanoparticles tested in this study were obtained from Nanotechnologies, Inc. and used without further treatment. For more information about the synthesis of these nanoparticles, please visit http://www.nanoscale.com
PVP-coated silver nanoparticles were synthesized by the polyol method using glycerine as both reducing agent and solvent. Silver sulfate (Ag2SO4, reagent grade) and poly (N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) (PVP-K30, MW = 40,000) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and 1,2,3-Propanetriol (Glycerin, >99%) was purchased from Fischer Chemicals, all the materials were used without any further treatment. Briefly, we added 0.2 g of PVP to a round bottom flask following by the addition of 30 mL of glycerin. Once PVP was dissolved, we increased the temperature to 140°C. After 30 minutes we added 2 mL of 0.015 M Ag2SO4 and left to react for 1 h.
Silver nanoparticles directly conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein molecules were produced as following described. Silver nitrate (AgNO3, 0.945 M), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 99%) and 200 proof spectrophotometric-grade ethanol were purchased from Aldrich. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Fisher and was used without further treatment. Briefly, sodium borohydride was added to an aqueous solution of silver nitrate and BSA under vigorous stirring. The molar ratio of Ag+:BSA was 28:1, and the molar ratio of Ag+:BH4- was 1:1. The reaction volume was 40 mL, and contained 13.50 μmol BSA. The reaction was allowed to proceed for 1 h, and the product was purified by precipitation at -5°C, followed by cold ethanol filtration.
c) Characterization of the different silver nanoparticle preparations
Transmission electron microscope was conducted in a HRTEM JEOL 2010F microscope equipped with Schottky-type field emission gun, ultra-high resolution pole piece (Cs = 0.5 mm), and a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) unit with high angle annular dark field (HAADF) detector operating at 200 kV. Briefly, a droplet of each different solution of silver nanoparticles was placed on a Cu grid with lacey carbon film (Ted Pella), and allowed to evaporate. Size distributions for each nanoparticle preparation were obtained from TEM analysis based on the measurement of 400 particles, and 600 particles in the case of BSA-coated nanoparticles.
UV-visible spectra were obtained at room temperature using a 10 mm path length quartz cuvette in a Cary 5000 spectrometer. All the solutions were diluted 30 × in deionized water before acquiring the spectra.
d) Electron microscopy of HIV-1 and silver nanoparticles
Samples were prepared for electron microscopy as follows: 105 TCID50 samples of HIV-1IIIB cell free virus were treated with solutions of the different silver nanoparticles at a concentration of 100 μg/mL. After 30 seconds, a 10 μL droplet was deposit on a carbon coated nickel TEM grid and exposed to a 2.5% solution of PBS/glutaraldehyde vapors for 30 minutes. Microscopy was done using a JEOL 2010-F TEM equipped with an Oxford EDS unit, at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV and operated in scanning mode using an HAADF detector.
e) Inhibition of HIV-1 with silver nanoparticles
RPMI medium only or containing varying concentrations of silver nanoparticles were mixed with samples 105 TCID50 of HIV-1IIIB cell free virus. The highest concentration of silver nanoparticles used was 100 μg/mL. After 30 seconds, sequential 2-fold dilutions of the solutions were added to cultures of target cells (2 × 105 MT-2 and 2 × 105 cMAGI HIV-1 reporter cells with 0.2–0.5 multiplicity of infection (m.o.i) of HIV-1IIIB virus) prepared as previously mentioned. Each dilution was exposed to four replicate wells. After that, the cells were incubated in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37°C for 3–5 days. Assessment of HIV-1 mediated syncytium formation was performed for the MT-2 cells, while for cMAGI cells, the percentage of transmission was estimated as follows: the number of blue-stained cells obtained from the supernatant of each of the tested wells was divided by the number of blue-stained cells obtained from the culture supernatant in the well of the positive control.
f) Cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles against MT-2 cells
The cytotoxicity of the nanoparticle preparations against MT-2 cells was determined using the Trypan Blue exclusion assay. In all cases, the initial concentration of silver nanoparticles was 50 μg/mL and sequential two-fold dilutions were made and mixed with 2 × 105 MT-2 cells. The samples were incubated at 37°C, and the cells were evaluated via optical microscopy after 3 h and 24 h of exposure to silver nanoparticles. Briefly, an aliquot of the cell suspension was diluted 1:1 (v/v) with 0.4% Trypan Blue and the cells were counted using a haemocytometer. Viability was expressed as the percentage of number of unstained treated cells to that of the total number of cells.
The authors want to thank Nanotechnologies, Inc. for providing their silver nanoparticles. J. L. Elechiguerra, J. R. Morones, and A. Camacho-Bragado acknowledge the support received from CONACYT- México. J.L.Burt thanks the University of Texas at Austin College of Engineering and Mr. Robert L. Mitchell for their financial support through the Thrust 2000 Robert L. and Jane G. Mitchell Endowed Graduate Fellowship in Engineering. This material is based upon work supported under a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (to JLB).
- Bonnemann H, Richards RM: Nanoscopic metal particles- Synthetic methods and potential applications. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2001, 10: 2455-2480. 10.1002/1099-0682(200109)2001:10<2455::AID-EJIC2455>3.3.CO;2-Q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nam JM, Thaxton CS, Mirkin CA: Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Science. 2003, 301: 1884-1886. 10.1126/science.1088755.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tkachenko AG, Xie H, Coleman D, Glomm W, Ryan J, Anderson MF, Franzen S, Feldheim DL: Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticle-Peptide Complexes for Nuclear Targeting. J Am Chem Soc. 2003, 125: 4700-4701. 10.1021/ja0296935.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, Sershen SR, Rivera B, Price RE, Hazle JD, Halas NJ, West JL: Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. PNAS. 2003, 100: 13549-13554. 10.1073/pnas.2232479100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liz-Marzan LM: Nanometals: Formation and color. Materials Today. 2004, 7: 26-31. 10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00080-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mulvaney P: Surface Plasmon Spectroscopy of Nanosized Metal Particles. Langmuir. 1996, 12: 788-800. 10.1021/la9502711.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burda C, Chen X, Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA: Chemistry and Properties of Nanocrystals of Different Shapes. Chemical Reviews (Washington, DC, United States). 2005, 105: 1025-1102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yu YY, Chang SS, Lee CL, Wang CRC: Gold nanorods: electrochemical synthesis and optical properties. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 1997, 101: 6661-6664. 10.1021/jp971656q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canizal G, Ascencio JA, Gardea-Torresday J, Jose-Yacaman M: Multiple twinned gold nanorods grown by bio-reduction techniques. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2001, 3: 475-481. 10.1023/A:1012578821566.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jana NR, Gearheart L, Murphy CJ: Seed-mediated growth approach for shape-controlled synthesis of spheroidal and rod-like gold nanoparticles using a surfactant template. Advanced Materials (Weinheim, Germany). 2001, 13: 1389-1393. 10.1002/1521-4095(200109)13:18<1389::AID-ADMA1389>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jana NR, Gearheart L, Murphy CJ: Wet chemical synthesis of high aspect ratio cylindrical gold nanorods. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2001, 105: 4065-4067. 10.1021/jp0107964.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun Y, Mayers B, Herricks T, Xia Y: Polyol Synthesis of Uniform Silver Nanowires: A Plausible Growth Mechanism and the Supporting Evidence. Nano Letters. 2003, 3: 955-960. 10.1021/nl034312m.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lisiecki I, Filankembo A, Sack-Kongehl H, Weiss K, Pileni MP, Urban J: Structural investigations of copper nanorods by high-resolution TEM. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics. 2000, 61: 4968-4974.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Y, Yu SH, Cui XP, Wang CY, Chen ZY: Formation of Silver Nanowires by a Novel Solid-Liquid Phase Arc Discharge Method. Chemistry of Materials. 1999, 11: 545-546. 10.1021/cm981122h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schultz S, Smith DR, Mock JJ, Schultz DA: Single-target molecule detection with nonbleaching multicolor optical immunolabels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America FIELD Publication Date:2000 Feb 1. 97: 996-1001. FIELD Reference Number: FIELD Journal Code:7505876 FIELD Call Number:. 10.1073/pnas.97.3.996.Google Scholar
- Liau SY, Read DC, Pugh WJ, Furr JR, Russell AD: Interaction of silver nitrate with readily identifiable groups: ralationship to the antibacterial action of silver ions. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1997, 25: 279-283. 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00219.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gupta A, Silver S: Silver as biocide:Will resistance become a problem?. Nat Biotechnol. 1998, 16: 888-10.1038/nbt1098-888.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nomiya K, Yoshizawa A, Tsukagoshi K, Kasuga NC, Hirakawa S, Watanabe J: Synthesis and structural characterization of silver (I), aluminium (III) and cobalt(II) complexes with 4-isopropyltropolone (hinokitiol) showing noteworthy biological activities. Action of silver(I)-oxygen bonding complexes on the antimicrobial activities. J Inorg Biochem. 2004, 98: 46-60. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2003.07.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B: Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: A case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 275: 177-182. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burt JL, Gutierrez-Wing C, Miki-Yoshida M, Jose-Yacaman MJ: Noble-Metal Nanoparticles Directly Conjugated to Globular Proteins. Langmuir. 2004, 20: 11778-11783. 10.1021/la048287r.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bradley JS: Clusters and Colloids: From Theory to Applications. Clusters and Colloids: From Theory to Applications. Edited by: Schmid GE. 1994, Weinheim, VCH, 459-536.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonet F, Guery C, Guyomard D, Urbina RH, Tekaia-Elhsissen K, Tarascon JM: Electrochemical reduction of noble metal compounds in ethylene glycol. International Journal of Inorganic Materials. 1999, 1: 47-51. 10.1016/S1463-0176(99)00007-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiley B, Sun Y, Mayers B, Xia Y: Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanostructures: The case of silver. Chemistry - A European Journal. 2005, 11: 454-463. 10.1002/chem.200400927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peters TJ: All About Albumin: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Medical Applications. All About Albumin: Biochemistry, Genetics, and Medical Applications. 1996, San Diego, Academic Press, 9-75.Google Scholar
- Brause R, Moeltgen H, Kleinermanns K: Characterization of laser-ablated and chemically reduced silver colloids in aqueous solution by UV/VIS spectroscopy and STM/SEM microscopy. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics. 2002, 75: 711-716. 10.1007/s00340-002-1024-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kerker M: The optics of colloidal silver: something old and something new. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1985, 105: 297-314. 10.1016/0021-9797(85)90304-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sosa IO, Noguez C, Barrera RG: Optical Properties of Metal Nanoparticles with Arbitrary Shapes. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003, 107: 6269-6275. 10.1021/jp0274076.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mock JJ, Barbic M, Smith DR, Schultz DA, Schultz S: Shape effects in plasmon resonance of individual colloidal silver nanoparticles. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2002, 116: 6755-6759. 10.1063/1.1462610.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petit C, Lixon P, Pileni MP: In situ synthesis of silver nanocluster in AOT reverse micelles. Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1993, 97: 12974-12983. 10.1021/j100151a054.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sweeney RY, Mao C, Gao X, Burt JL, Belcher AM, Georgiou G, Iverson BL: Bacterial Biosynthesis of Cadmium Sulfide Nanocrystals. Chemistry & Biology. 2004, 11: 1553-1559. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.08.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- James EM, Browning ND: Practical aspects of atomic resolution imaging and analysis in STEM. Ultramicroscopy. 1999, 78: 125-139. 10.1016/S0304-3991(99)00018-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forster MJ, Mulloy B, Nermut MV: Molecular modelling study of HIV p17gag (MA) protein shell utilising data from electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. J Mol Biol. 2000, 298: 841-857. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3715.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arthur LO, Bess JW, Sowder RC, Benveniste R, Mann D, Chermann J, Henderson L: Cellular proteins bound to immunodeficiency viruses: implications for pathogenesis and vaccines. Science. 1992, 258: 1935-1938.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leonard CK, Spellman MW, Riddle L, Harris RJ, Thomas JN, Gregory TJ: Assignment of intrachain disulfide bonds and characterization of potential glycosylation sites of the type 1 recombinant human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein (gp120) expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem. 1990, 265: 10373-10382.Google Scholar
- Gelderblom HR, Hausmann EHS, Ozel M, Pauli G, Koch MA: Fine structure of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and immunolocalization of structural proteins. Virology. 1987, 156: 171-176. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90449-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dalgleish AG, Beverley PCL, Clapham PR, Crawford DH, Greaves MF, Weiss RA: The CD4 (T4) antigen is an essential component of the receptor for the AIDS retrovirus. Nature. 1984, 312: 763-767. 10.1038/312763a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klatzmann D, Champagne E, Chamaret S, Gruest J, Guetard D, Hercend T, Gluckman JC, Montagnier L: T-lymphocyte T4 molecule behaves as the receptor for human retrovirus LAV. Nature. 1984, 312: 767-768. 10.1038/312767a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng Y, Broder CC, Kennedy PE, Berger E: HIV-1 entry cofactor: Functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 1996, 272: 872-877.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harada S, Koyanagi Y, Yamamoto N: Infection of HTLV-III/LAV in HTLV-I-carrying cells MT-2 and MT-4 and application in a plaque assay. Science. 1985, 229: 563-566.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sodroski J, Goh WC, Rosen C, Campbell K, Haseltine WA: Role of the HTLV-III/LAV envelope in syncytium formation and cytopathicity. Nature. 1986, 322: 470-474. 10.1038/322470a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deng H, Liu R, Ellmeier W, Choe S, Unutmaz D, Burkhart M, Di Marzio P, Marmon S, Sutton RE, Hill CM, Davis CB, Peiper SC, Schall TJ, Littman DR, Landau NR: Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature. 1996, 381: 661-10.1038/381661a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chackerian B, Long EM, Luciw PA, Overbaugh J: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 coreceptors participate in postentry stages in the virus replication cycle and function in simian immunodeficiency virus infection. J Virol. 1997, 71: 3932-3939.Google Scholar
- Kaltenbach JP, Kaltenbach MH, Lyons WB: Nigrosin as a dye for differentiating live and dead ascites cells*1. Exp Cell Res. 1958, 15: 112-117. 10.1016/0014-4827(58)90067-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.