Open Access

Two-stimuli manipulation of a biological motor

  • Zorica Ristic1,
  • Marco Vitali2, 5,
  • Alessandro Duci3,
  • Christian Goetze3,
  • Klaus Kemnitz4,
  • Werner Zuschratter2,
  • Holger Lill1 and
  • Dirk Bald1Email author
Journal of Nanobiotechnology20097:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-7-3

Received: 17 February 2009

Accepted: 15 May 2009

Published: 15 May 2009

Abstract

F1-ATPase is an enzyme acting as a rotary nano-motor. During catalysis subunits of this enzyme complex rotate relative to other parts of the enzyme. Here we demonstrate that the combination of two input stimuli causes stop of motor rotation. Application of either individual stimulus did not significantly influence motor motion. These findings may contribute to the development of logic gates using single biological motor molecules.

Findings

Biological nano-scale motors fulfil a broad range of tasks in living cells. Some motors like myosin, kinesin and dynein move in linear fashion. Other motors perform rotary motion, e.g. the bacterial flagellar motor or the enzyme F1-ATPase. F1-ATPase hydrolyses ATP into ADP and inorganic phosphate. It is the smallest biological rotary motor known, with a total molecular mass of ~400 kDa and the core subunits α3β3γ [13]. During enzymatic catalysis subunit γ rotates within the hexagonal α3β3 domain. This rotary movement has been microscopically monitored by attachment of large probes such as fluorescently labelled actin filaments and polymer microspheres to subunit γ [47]. In addition to plain motor observation, also manipulation of motor movement has been reported. Rotation in reverse direction was imposed on F1-ATPase using magnetic tweezers [8, 9]. Furthermore, rotor movement was successfully modulated by chemical signals, including redox-switching [10, 11], builtin Zn-sensitive switches [12], small organic molecules [1315] as well as by temperature control [16, 17]. However, these experiments describe the response of F1 to individual stimuli and do not reveal how simultaneously acting stimuli are processed by the motor.

Here we report manipulation of the F1-ATPase motor movement at single molecule level by concerted optical and chemical input stimuli. We combined an optical stimulus (high-intensity illumination) with a chemical stimulus (rhodamine 6G), on the rotary movement of single F1 molecules.

Biotin-PEAC maleimide was purchased from Dojindo (Kumamoto, Japan). Streptavidin-coated microspheres (mean diameter: 510 nm) were from Bangs Laboratories, Inc. (Fishers, Indiana, USA). Other chemicals were of the highest grade commercially available.

Preparation of F1-ATPase

The α3β3γ core complex of F1-ATPase originating from Bacillus PS3 was prepared as previously described in [10] and hereinafter referred to as F1-ATPase. The enzyme was over-expressed in Escherichia coli strain JM103 uncB-D using the pkkHC5 expression plasmid [10]. This plasmid codes for the α, β, and γ subunits of the thermophilic Bacillus PS3 F1-ATPase, carrying a decahistidine tag at the N terminus of the β subunit and the mutation γSer106→Cys.

Rotation Assay

F1-ATPase was biotinylated at a single cysteine residue in subunit γ using biotin-(PEAC)5-maleimide (Dojindo, Japan), as described elsewhere [10]. The biotinylated F1-ATPase (30 nM) in an assay mixture containing 10 mM 3-(N-Morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS)/KOH (pH 7.0), 50 mM KCl and 2 mM MgCl2 (buffer A) was infused into a flow cell, constructed from microscope cover slips as described [4], and incubated for 5 min to allow for immobilization. The flow cell was washed with 100 μl of Buffer A supplemented with 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (buffer B). Subsequently, a suspension of streptavidin-coated polystyrene beads (Bangs Laboratories, diameter 510 nm) suspended in Buffer B was infused and incubated for 15 min. Next, 100 μl of reaction buffer (Buffer B supplemented with 2 mM ATP, 4 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, and 0.1 mg/ml pyruvate kinase (Roche Applied Science) in the absence or in the presence 100 μM Rhodamine 6G (Merck) was infused and microscopic observation was started. Rotation of beads was observed under bright field illumination with an inverted fluorescence microscope (TI Eclipse, Nikon) equipped by a Nikon Plan. Apo. 100× (N.A. 1.4) objective. Images were recorded with an Andor iXon DU-897BI EMCCD camera (Andor Technology, Belfast, UK) at 25 Hz frame rate. Image analysis was done using self made tracking routines under Matlab (The MathWorks, Natick, USA) and the open-source image analysis software ImageJ. Bright field illumination was performed by an attenuated 100W Halogen lamp (35 mW/cm/2 on the sample).

High illumination intensity of the probe was performed by 110 W Mercury lamp in epi-fluorescence illumination. The excitation wavelength was selected by a 540 ± 10 nm interference filter.

Motor movement in absence of input stimuli

ATP-driven rotation of F1-ATPase subunit γ was visualized by attachment of a bead to the γ subunit (Fig. 1a) [7, 11], typical time courses of the rotational movement of two molecules F1 are shown in Fig. 1b. Rotation of both single-bead as well as duplex-beads was unidirectional, continuous and directions were always counter-clockwise when viewed from top (Fig. 1b, [6]). Bead rotation occasionally displayed pauses and subsequently resumed rotation. These pauses have been described previously and may be attributed to transient inhibition of F1 by Mg-ADP [18, 19].
Figure 1

Rotary movement of F 1 -ATPase motor. (A) Schematic view of the experimental system for the observation of F1-ATPase rotation [7, 11]. The polystyrene bead (diameter 0.51 μm) is connected to the F1 motor (not to scale). (B) Time course of F1-ATPase rotation. Typical traces for single beads (dashed line) and duplex beads (straight line) bound to one F1-ATPase molecule are shown.

Motor response to concerted chemical and physical input

Next, we determined the motor response to concerted physical and chemical stimuli. Illumination of the samples with light at 540 ± 10 nm for 5–10 sec at maximum intensity (110 W/cm2) in the presence of rhodamine 6G lead to a complete arrest of motor movement within the duration of the light pulse (Fig. 2a). This light-induced motor response was highly reproducible and observed for >90% of all investigated motor molecules (n = 20), with "motor arrest" defined as <1 revolution per minute of a single or a duplex bead. These results indicate that rotation of the F1-motor can be stopped by the combination of an optical and a chemical input signal.
Figure 2

Manipulation of F 1 rotor motion by optical and chemical inputs. Sequential images of a rotating beads before and after a pulse (10 sec) of high intensity white light illumination (white bar) in the presence (A) or absence (B) of rhodamine 6G. (C) Rotating beads in the presence of rhodamine 6G, but without light pulse.

Motor response to individual input variables

We have observed a dramatic response of F1-ATPase motor movement to two combined inputs. Next, we assessed the two inputs imposed separately on the rotating motor. Firstly we tested the effect of high light intensity on F1 rotation in the absence of rhodamine 6G. Typically, no significant effect on motor movement was detected (Fig. 2b), only <10% of the observed F1 – ATPase molecules (n = 22) stopped upon illumination.

Subsequently we evaluated the effect of the chemical input (rhodamine 6G) alone on motor movement. As depicted in Fig. 2b, rhodamine 6G alone did not significantly influence motor rotation (<10% of n = 20 observed molecules arrested). Turnover of ATP by F1-ATPase in bulk-phase is influenced by rhodamine 6G and related lipophilic cations [2028]. Whereas, low concentrations of rhodamine stimulate F1-ATPase (up to 10 μM), higher concentrations lead to enzyme inhibition [20, 21]. Rhodamine 6G at higher concentration is believed to bind F1-ATPase at least at two binding sites [2028]. High intensity illumination may cause photoreactions that modulate the affinity of rhodamine 6G for F1-ATPase [2931].

We have demonstrated that the movement of a biological motor can be arrested by synergistic inputs of optical and chemical stimuli. Motor arrest is observed at single molecule level and does not occur when the input stimuli are applied separately. The motor response reported here is is consistent with a function as an "AND" logic gate in terms of producing a single output on two concerted inputs [3234]. For full implementation of a motor protein "AND" gate, reversibility of the motor system response is an important factor. Experiments to gain a deeper understanding of the response mechanism and to improve reversibility are on-going in our laboratory. Biomolecules acting as "AND" gates in bulk-phase have been described earlier, e.g. light dependent release of an unfolded fluorescent protein from a chaperone protein [34], or an enzyme-based logic gate [35]. Extending the work of these authors, our results may help to develop motor protein-based logic gates, operating and monitored at the single molecule level.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Financial support provided by the European Commission (Marie-Curie project MRTN-CT-2005-019481 "From FLIM to FLIN") is gratefully acknowledged.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, VU University Amsterdam
(2)
Leibniz-Institute for Neurobiology
(3)
arivis Multiple Imaging Tools
(4)
EuroPhoton
(5)
Technical University Berlin

References

  1. Abrahams JP, Lesli AGW, Lutter R, Walker JE: Structure at 2.8 Å resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Nature. 1994, 370: 621-628. 10.1038/370621a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kinosita K, Adachi K, Itoh H: Rotation of F1-ATPase: How an ATPdriven molecular machine may work. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2004, 33: 245-268. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.33.110502.132716.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Von Ballmoos C, Cook GM, Dimroth P: Unique Rotary ATP Synthase and its Biological Diversity. Annu Rev Biophys. 2008, 37: 43-64. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.130018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Noji H, Yasuda R, Yoshida M, Kinosita K: Direct observation of the rotation of F1-ATPase. Nature. 1997, 386: 299-302. 10.1038/386299a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hisabori T, Kondoh A, Yoshida M: The γ subunit in chloroplast F1-ATPase can rotate in a unidirectional and counter-clockwise manner. FEBS Letters. 1999, 463: 35-38. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01602-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Noji H, Häsler K, Junge W, Kinosita K, Yoshida M, Engelbrecht S: Rotation of Escherichia coli F(1)-ATPase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999, 260 (3): 597-9. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0885.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Yasuda R, Noji H, Yoshida M, Kinosita KJr, Itoh H: Resolution of distinct rotational substeps by submillisecond kinetic analysis of F1-ATPase. Nature. 2001, 410: 898-904. 10.1038/35073513.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Itoh H, Takahashi A, Adachi A, Noji H, Yasuda R, Yoshida M, Kinosita K: Mechanically driven ATP synthesis by F1-ATPase. Nature. 2004, 427: 465-468. 10.1038/nature02212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Rondelez Y, Tresset G, Nakashima T, Kato-Yamada Y, Fujita H, Takeuchi S, Noji H: Highly coupled ATP synthesis by F1-ATPase single molecules. Nature. 2005, 433 (7027): 773-7. 10.1038/nature03277.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bald D, Noji H, Stumpp MT, Yoshida M, Hisabori T: ATPase activity of a highly stable alpha(3)beta(3)gamma subcomplex of thermophilic F(1) can be regulated by the introduced regulatory region of gamma subunit of chloroplast F(1). J Biol Chem. 2000, 275 (17): 12757-62. 10.1074/jbc.275.17.12757.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bald D, Noji H, Yoshida M, Hirono-Hara Y, Hisabori T: Redox Regulation of the Rotation of the F1-ATP Synthase. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (43): 39505-39507. 10.1074/jbc.C100436200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu H, Schmidt JJ, Bachand GD, Rizk SS, Looger LL, Hellinga HW, Montemagno CD: Control of a biomolecular motor-powered nanodevice with an engineered chemical switch. Nat Mater. 2002, 1: 173-177. 10.1038/nmat761.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Groth G, Hisabori T, Lill H, Bald D: Substitution of a single amino acid switches the tentoxin-resistant thermophilic F1-ATPase into a tentoxinsensitive enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (23): 20117-20119. 10.1074/jbc.C200168200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Pavlova P, Shimabukuro K, Hisabori T, Groth G, Lill H, Bald D: Complete Inhibition and Partial Re-activation of Single F1-ATPase Molecules by Tentoxin. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 9685-9688. 10.1074/jbc.C400014200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Meiss E, Konno H, Groth G, Hisaboru T: Molecular Processes of Inhibition and Stimulation of ATP Synthase Caused by the Phytotoxin Tentoxin. J Biol Chem. 2007, 283 (36): 24594-24599. 10.1074/jbc.M802574200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yamagushi S, Matsumoto S, Ishizuka K, Iko Y, Tabata KV, Arata HF, Fujita H, Noji H, Itaru H: Thermally responsive supramolecular nanomesches for on/off switching of rotary motion of F1-ATPase at the single molecule level. Chem Eur J. 2008, 14: 1891-1896. 10.1002/chem.200701285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Furuike S, Adachi K, Sakaki N, Shimo-Kon R, Itoh H, Muneyuki E, Yoshida M, Kinosita K: Temperature Dependence of the Rotation and Hydrolysis Activities of F1-ATPase. Biophys J. 2008, 95: 761-770. 10.1529/biophysj.107.123307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jault JM, Dou C, Grodsky NB, Matsui T, Yoshida M, Allison WS: The alpha3beta3gamma subcomplex of the F1-ATPase from the thermophilic bacillus PS3 with the betaT165S substitution does not entrap inhibitory MgADP in a catalytic site during turnover. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (15): 28818-28824.Google Scholar
  19. Hirono-Hara Y, Noji H, Nishiura M, Muneyuki E, Hara KY, Yasuda R, Kinosita K, Yoshida M: Pause and rotation of F(1)-ATPase during catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001, 98 (24): 13649-13654. 10.1073/pnas.241365698.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Paik SR, Yokogama M, Yoshida M, Ohta T, Kagawa Y, Allison WS: The TF1-ATPase and ATPase Activities of Assembled α3β3γ, α3β3γδ and α3β3γε Complexes are Stimulated by Low and Inhibited by High Concentrations of Rhodamine 6G Whereas the Dye Only Inhibits the α3β3, and α3β3δ Complexes. J Bioenergeties and Biomembranes. 1993, 25 (6): 679-684.Google Scholar
  21. Gledhill JR, Walker JE: Inhibition sites in F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Biochemical Journal. 2005, 386: 591-598. 10.1042/BJ20041513.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Allison WS, Jault JM, Zhuo S, Paik SR: Functional sites in F1-ATPase: localication and interactions. J Bioenergeties and Biomembranes. 1992, 24 (5): 469-477. 10.1007/BF00762364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Grodsky NB, Allison WS: The adenine pocket of a single catalytic site is derivatized when the bovine heart mitochondrial F1-ATPase is photoinactivated with 4-amino-1-octylquinaldinium. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1999, 31 (3): 285-294. 10.1007/BF02738243.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bullogh DA, Ceccarelli EA, Roise D, Allison Ws: Inhibition of the bovineheart mitochondrial F1-ATPase by cationic dyes and amphipathic peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1989, 975: 377-383. 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80346-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wieker HJ, Kuschmitz D, Hess B: Inhibition of yeast mitochondrial F1-ATPase, F0F1-ATPase and submitochondrial particles by rhodamines and ethidium bromide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987, 892: 108-117. 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90253-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gear LR: Rhodamine 6G. JBC. 1984, 249: 3628-3637.Google Scholar
  27. Higuti T, Nijmi S, Sajto R, Nakasima S, Ohe T, Tani I, Yoshimura T: Rhodamine 6G, inhibitor of both H+-ejections from mitochondria energized with ATP and with respiratory substrates. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980, 593: 463-467. 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90081-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hong S, Pedersen PL: ATP Synthase and the Actions of Inhibitors Utilized To Study Its Roles in Human Health, Disease, and Other Scientific Areas. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2008, 590-641. 10.1128/MMBR.00016-08.Google Scholar
  29. Xu XH, Yeung ES: Direct Measurement of Single-Molecule Diffusion and Photodecomposition in Free Solution. Science. 1997, 275 (5303): 1106-1109. 10.1126/science.275.5303.1106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Windegren J, Chmyrov A, Eggeling C, Löfdahl PA, Seidel CA: Strategies to improve photostabilities in ultrasensitive fluorescence spectroscopy. J Phys Chem A. 2007, 111 (3): 429-440. 10.1021/jp0646325.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fernàndez-Suárez M, Ting AY: Fluorscent probes for super-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 9 (12): 929-943. 10.1038/nrm2531.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. De Silva AP, Uchiyama S: Molecular logic and computing. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007, 2: 399-410. 10.1038/nnano.2007.188.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Willner I, Shlyahovsky B, Zayats M, Willner B: DNAzymes for sensing, nanotechnologoly and logic gate applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2008, 37: 1153-1165. 10.1039/b718428j.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Muramatsu S, Kinbara K, Taguchi H, Ishii N, Aida T: Semibiological molecular machine with an implemented "AND" logic gate for regulation of protein folding. J Am Chem Soc. 2006, 128 (11): 3764-9. 10.1021/ja057604t.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Sivan S, Tuchman S, Lotan N: A biochemical logic gate using an enzyme and its inhibitor. Part II: The logic gate. BioSystems. 2003, 70: 21-33. 10.1016/S0303-2647(03)00039-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ristic et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement