Skip to main content

Construction of biocompatible bovine serum albumin nanoparticles composed of nano graphene oxide and AIEgen for dual-mode phototherapy bacteriostatic and bacterial tracking



Efficient and highly controllable antibacterial effect, as well as good biocompatibility are required for antibacterial materials to overcome multi-drug resistance in bacteria. Herein, nano graphene oxide (NGO)-based near-infrared (NIR) photothermal antibacterial materials was schemed to complex with biocompatible bovine serum albumin (BSA) and aggregation-induced emission fluorogen (AIEgen) with daylight-stimulated ROS-producing property for dual-mode phototherapy in the treatment of antibiotic resistance bacteria.


Upon co-irradiation of daylight and NIR laser, NGO-BSA-AIE nanoparticles (NPs) showed superiorly antibacterial effect (more than 99%) both against amoxicillin (AMO)-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) by comparison with sing-model phototherapy. Meanwhile, the NGO-BSA-AIE NPs displayed prominent stability and excellently controllable biocompatibility. More importantly, under daylight irradiation, the AIEgen not only produced plentiful ROS for killing bacteria, but also presented fluorescence image for tracking bacteria.


Hence, the designed system provided tempting strategy of employing light as impetus for tracking bacterial distribution and photothermal/photodynamic synergistic treatment of antibiotic resistance antibacterial.


The speedy emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria has become a global concern, and there is an urgent need for new antibacterial agent that can effectively kill antibiotic resistant bacteria [1, 2]. With the rapid development in nanotechnology, antibacterial nanomaterials have been used as alternatives to antibiotic drug [3,4,5]. So far, various types of antibacterial nanomaterials including organic nanomaterials and inorganic nanomaterials have been researched. For organic antibacterial nanomaterials, such as cationic polymeric nanoparticles showed excellent antibacterial effect [6,7,8]. Nevertheless, most of them exhibited serious cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory effect. Likewise, in pertinent to some inorganic antibacterial nanomaterial, for example gold, silver nanoparticles were reported to have high cell toxicity [9, 10]. Therefore, controllable antibacterial effect is still required, wherein the antibacterial agents keep high antibacerial effect in the pathological site, but stay well biocompatibility in normal tissue and cells.

Phototherapy is a promising modality that can be switched off/on controllably by an external light irradiation to kill bacterial [11,12,13,14,15]. In this technique, photothermal agents that can produce heat under the external light irradiation have received increasing attention in bacteriostatic treatment [16, 17]. Among them, graphene-based nanomaterials showed high photothermal conversion efficiency under near-infrared (NIR) light irradiation and exceptional amphiphilicity to possess a favorable affinity binding to bacterial cell membranes for the preparation of nanoscale delivery particles to encapsulate hydrophobic materials [15, 18,19,20]. Especially, nano graphene oxide (NGO) presented superior surface activity by comparison with micrometer-sized GO sheets [21,22,23,24]. Nevertheless, it is reported that the bacterial killing is not effective at 50–60 °C. The photothermal temperature is required up to over 70 °C to completely kill the antibiotic resistant bacteria, at which temperature the surrounding tissue and cells would be damaged [15]. Therefore, solo photothermal antibacterial method rarely accomplish precise therapy.

Except for photothermal antibacterial (PTA), another promising phototherapy for antibacterial is photodynamic antibacterial (PDA), wherein the photosensitizers produce toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxides and hydroxyl radicals (∙OH) to kill pathogenic bacteria on exposure to light with a suitable wavelenght [25,26,27,28]. However, most photosensitizers suffer from aggregation-caused efficacy decline. Fortunately, aggregation-induced emission fluorogen (AIEgen) is opposite to traditional organic photosensitizers and has appreciable capacity in producing ROS in their aggregated state [29, 30]. In our previous work, we developed a AIEgen, which can produce large amounts of ROS under daylight irradiation and show good fluorescent imaging in the poor solvent [31,32,33]. Uniting PTA with PDA is envisioned to achieve synergistic outcomes and promote enhanced bacterial ablation [16, 34]. However, the poor stability and biocompatibility of NGO/AIEgen composite in aqueous solutions are considered as obstacles for further applications in biomedical fields [35]. To address these obstacle, biocompatible bovine serum albumin (BSA) is schemed to be included the composite [36, 37]. Due to the strong hydrophobicity of AIEgen, it is proposed to entrapped it into amphiphilic NGO and BSA to form nanoparticles [35, 38]. Herein, a ternary nanoparticle (NP) formulated by NGO, BSA and AIEgen via hydrophobic interactions was developed as an antibacterial nanomaterial for dual-mode phototherapy. Dual-mode phototherapy integrating PTA with PDA is expected to produce a higher bacteriostatic efficiency through synergistic effects. More importantly, AIEgen is charecterized as not only a photosensitizer for killing bacterias, but also a fluorescence probe for tracking bacteria distribution, enabling NGO-BSA-AIE NPs to trace bacteria for better therapeutic results (Scheme 1). Overall, the proposed system provided a new platform for collaborative dual-mode phototherapy bacteriostatic and tracking bacterial distribution.

Scheme 1

Schematic illustration of the preparation process of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs, NGO-BSA-AIE NPs for tracking bacteria and dual-mode phototherapy bacteriostatic


Preparation of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs

The BSA (2 mg) was added to NGO aqueous solution (0.5 mg mL−1, 1 mL) and stirred for 30 min at 25 °C followed by addition of AIEgen solution (50 μg mL−1, 200 μL, dissolved in THF), which was the concentration we used for antibacteria study. N2 was continuously passed during the reaction to remove THF. After THF was removed, the system was stirred for another 10 min to obtain NGO-BSA-AIE NPs, which was sealed and stored at 4 °C for subsequent experiments.

Detection of ROS production

To study the ROS producing activity of the AIEgen and NGO-BSA-AIE NPs, 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) was used to detect the production of ROS under daylight irradiation. Briefly, 0.5 mL ethanol solution of DCF-DA (1 mM) was added to 2 mL of NaOH (10 mM) aqueous solution and the mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 30 min. The hydrolysate (dichlorodihydrofluorescein, DCFH) was then neutralized with 10 mL of PBS (pH = 7.4). Then, 100 μL of obtained DCFH solution was added to 900 μL of AIEgen dispersed in THF/deionized water (1:1), as well as NGO-BSA-AIE NPs dispersed in deionized water, both of which were exposed to daylight irradiation for different time intervals at a power density of 10 mW cm−2 (All the light irradiation was in the same condition). The change in the fluorescence intensity of the measurement solution was performed under excitation of 488 nm while collecting emission at 500 to 600 nm.

Photothermal effect

Firstly, 1 mL of different concentrations of NGO solution and NGO-BSA-AIE NPs were placed in a test tube. Then, the samples were irradiated with a NIR laser (795 nm) at a power density of 2.5 W cm−2 for 10 min.

Antibacterial activity

AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus were inoculated into LB liquid medium, and after incubating overnight at 37 °C in a shaking incubator (170 rpm), the bacteria were centrifuged (8000 rpm, 5 min) and suspended in PBS buffer solution (pH = 7.4). Subsequently, the bacterial suspension was serially dilutedwith PBS to a concentration of 106 CFU mL−1. In detail, diluted bacterial suspensions (AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus) without any treatment were used as a control. Furthermore, the bacterial suspension treated with AMO (100 μg mL−1 for AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus) were to demonstrate the antibiotic resistance of the bacteria. Both blank bacterial suspensions and bacterial suspensions treated with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs were exposed to daylight for 1 h followed by NIR irradiation for 5 min (795 nm, 2.5 W cm−2). While the bacterial suspensions treated with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs were stored in a dark environment, or bacterial irradiated with daylight for 1 h, or irradiated with 795 nm NIR laser for 5 min. All of the suspensions were cultured in the incubator for 4 h, followed by being diluted with an appropriate dilution factor. The diluted treated bacterial suspensions (100 μL) were transferred to solid LB agar plates, then incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. After the cultivation, the number of colony forming units (CFU) was counted, and the bacterial survival rates and antibacterial efficiency were measured.

The CFU ratio was calculated using the following equation: CFU ratio = C/C0 × 100%. C and C0 were the CFU of the experimental group treated with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs or the control group without any treatments, respectively. Results were expressed as the mean and standard deviation of three parallel groups.

And the antibacterial efficiency was calculated using the following equation: antibacterial efficiency = (1 − C/C0) × 100%.

Bacterial imaging

AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus were incubated at 37 °C overnight to a concentration of 109 CFU mL−1 and washed with PBS three times, followed by being transferred to a 35 mm glass-bottom after proper dilution. NGO-BSA-AIE NPs (100 μL) were then added to the plate. After 6 h of incubation, the bacterial suspensions were washed three times with PBS buffer, and finally the bacteria were retained in 1 mL of PBS for bioimaging.

Cytotoxicity study

MTT assay was performed in this experiment to assess the cell viability. L929 cells were seeded in 96-well U-bottom plates at a density of 5000 cells per well and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in culture medium. After overnight incubation, cells were treated with different concentrations of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs. Then replaced the fresh cell medium and further cultured for 24 h. After that, MTT solution (5 mg mL−1) was added to 96-well plates at 10 µL per well and incubated for 4 h. After removing MTT solution, 100 μL of filtered DMSO was added into each well to dissolve all the formed crystals. The cell viability was accessed by means of MTT absorbance at 570 nm recorded using a microplate reader (Epoch, BioTek, Gene company Limited). The cell viability in each well was calculated from the obtained values as a percentage of control wells. The results were presented as a mean and standard deviation obtained from eight samples.

Statistics analysis

Significant differences in bacterial viability between any two groups were assessed using Student’s t test.

Results and discussion

Synthesis and characterization of NGO

Firstly, GO was synthesized using natural graphite by an improved Hummer’s method [22, 39]. The resulting GO was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) measurements and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Additional file 1: Figure S1). These results indicated the successful preparation of GO. Afterwards, GO was sonicated in water and filtered to obtain NGO. The obtained NGO displayed a particle size of 93 nm with polydispersity index (PDI = 0.199) via dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurment (Fig. 1a). SEM was further utilized to check the morphology of NGO. As shown in Fig. 1b, the NGO presented as nanoparticles with average diameter of 85 ± 15.5 nm, which is consist with the result of DLS measurments.

Fig. 1

a Size distribution and b SEM image of synthetic NGO

Synthesis and characterization of AIEgen

The AIEgen used in the present study was synthesized according to the previously reported method [31,32,33]. Successful synthesis of AIEgen was verified by 1H-NMR measurement. Afterwards, we examined the UV–vis/fluorescence spectroscopic and ROS-producing activity of AIEgen. As shown in Fig. 2a, the as-synthesized AIEgen had an excitation wavelength of approximately 500 nm, while the emission wavelength appeared to be in the range of 600–750 nm with an emission maximum at 640 nm, which was in the red/NIR region and suggested its potential application with considerable tissue penetration. Figure 2c showed the unique AIE characteristics of the proposed AIEgen. The fluorescence intensity (FL) increased rapidly with the addition of water. Then, the ROS-producing activity of the synthesized AIEgen under daylight (10 mW cm−2) for various time period was detected using dichlorofluorescein (DCF) as an indicator (Fig. 2b). The experimental results confirmed that AIEgen produced large amounts of ROS with the extension of illumination time, demonstrating that AIEgen can be used as an effective ROS self-sufficient component.

Fig. 2

a Absorption and emission spectra of the synthesized AIEgen. b FL spectra of the AIEgen and DCF mixture in THF/water to detect its ROS production under daylight exposures (10 mW cm−2) for various time period. c Aggregation-induced emission characteristics of AIEgen: FL spectra of AIEgen in different ratios of THF/water mixture (λex = 493 nm) and calculated I/I0 ratios as a function of water fraction

Fabrication and characterization of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs

NGO-BSA-AIE NPs were prepared by nanoprecipitation method [29]. Briefly, AIEgen solution (50 μg mL−1, 200 μL, dissolved in THF) was added to the mixed solution of BSA (2 mg mL−1) and NGO (0.5 mg mL−1), then N2 was continuously passed during the reaction to remove THF and NGO-BSA-AIE NPs was obtained. The resulting NGO-BSA-AIE NPs showed a hydrodynamic diameter of approximately 125 nm with a PDI of 0.246 as determined by DLS measurements (Fig. 3a). SEM was further performed to observe the morphology of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs. It presented as spherical morphology with a diameter of 105 ± 12.5 nm (Fig. 3b). Notably, individual NGOs were very unstable in salt solutions (Additional file 1: Figure S2a), which was in agreement with previous reports [35]. Then, the stability of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs in cell medium, saline aqueous solution (PBS) and water were checked via DLS measurements. As confirmed in Fig. 3c and Additional file 1: Figure S2, the obtained NGO-BSA-AIE NPs exhibited significant stability with consistent hydrodynamic diameter and PDI over a 7-day continuous measurements, showing the potential application in biomedical therapeutics.

Fig. 3

Characterization of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs by a DLS, b SEM imaging (Scale bars: 200 nm) and c Stability evaluation of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs within 7 days in RPMI 1640 media by DLS size monitoring

The photodynamic properties

The ROS-producing activity of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs under daylight exposures (10 mW cm−2) was detected using DCF as an indicator [33]. The fluorescence intensity increased with the prolonged time of daylight irradiation, which was beneficial to control the antibacterial photodynamic therapy (Fig. 4a). We further explored the production of ROS from NGO-BSA-AIE NPs in AMOr E. coli (Fig. 4b) and AMOr S. aureus (Additional file 1: Figure S3) according to confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Remarkable ROS was detected under light irradiation with the aid of DCF-DA indicator, and the green fluorescence intensity became stronger with extended daylight exposure time, indicating that the amount of ROS production in the bacteria increased with the irradiation time. The control group was treated with vitamin C because it had a strong antioxidant effect, thereby inhibiting the production of ROS in bacteria by NGO-BSA-AIE NPs. Therefore, NGO-BSA-AIE NPs have intriguing potential for effective antibacterial photodynamic therapy.

Fig. 4

a ROS production under daylight exposures (10 mW cm−2). b CLSM imaging of AMOr E. coli after incubation with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs and DCF-DA under daylight irradiation for different time in the presence and absence of vitamin C. (λex = 488 nm, λem = 525 nm) Scale bars: 5 μm

The photothermal properties

GO has strong optical absorption in the NIR region (700–1100 nm) and can be used as a photothermal agent [26, 40]. Besides efficient photodynamic activity, NGO-BSA-AIE NPs is anticipated to possess exceptional photothermal properties. Figure 5a showed the temperature change of different concentrations of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs under 795 nm NIR laser irradiation. The NGO-BSA-AIE NPs exhibited an obvious temperature elevation of 14 °C within 10 min at the NGO concentration of 0.25 mg mL−1. Higher concentration of NGO led to enhanced temperature increase. It is worth noting that both NGO and NGO-BSA-AIE NPs of the same concentration exhibited the same photothermal effect, indicating that inclusion of AIEgen and BSA did not influence the photothermal performance of NGO (Additional file 1: Figure S4). Additionally, to test the photothermal stability of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs, repeated laser on and off were performed. As shown in Fig. 5b, the temperature of the NGO-BSA-AIE NPs solution exhibited a significant switching effect with or without NIR laser irradiation. Even after being treated for 5 cycles, NGO-BSA-AIE NPs could still rise to about 50 °C upon exposure to NIR laser for 5 min, demonstrating excellent photothermal stability.

Fig. 5

a Photothermal curves of different concentrations of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs under 795 nm NIR laser irradiation. NGO: 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg mL−1; BSA: 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 mg mL−1; AIE: 0.5, 10, 20 μg mL−1. b The temperature rising and cooling curve of the NGO-BSA-AIE NPs with 5 times laser switch-on and switch-off treatment

Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial property of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs combining PTA with PDA was evaluated. Herein, the culture was passaged 30 times in a continuous treatment in which the concentration of AMO was gradually increased to obtain AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus [5]. To confirm the antibiotic resistance, the bacterial suspensions treated with AMO (100 μg mL−1) showed a survival rate of 92.2% for AMOr E. coli and 92.1% for AMOr S. aureus. Figure 6 showed the antibacterial effect of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs against AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus with or without daylight and NIR laser irradiation. Diluted bacterial (PBS, pH = 7.4) suspensions without any treatment were used as control. According to the spread-plate results, the CFU was counted in the bacterial plate to evaluate the survival rates and antibacterial efficiency (Fig. 6a–c). Obviously, NGO-BSA-AIE NPs showed neglectable antibacterial efficiency in the absence of light irradiation. The bacterial survival rates of AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus were 89.9% and 91.1%, respectively. Meanwhile, blank bacterial suspensions treated with daylight and NIR laser irradiation confirmed that the irradiation treatment did not affect the bacteriostatic efficiency, which showed a survival rate of 98.8% and 97.1% for AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus. Whereas, the antibacterial efficiency of bacterial suspensions treated with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs after exposure to daylight and NIR irradiation against AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus was both over 99%. By comparison, bacterial suspensions treated with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs under exposure to daylight or NIR irradiation displayed faint inhibitory effects on AMOr E. coli (40.5%, 15.3% of CFU ratio) and AMOr S. aureus (26.1%, 23.8% of CFU ratio). Complete antibacterial efficiency was rarely fulfilled under solo laser irradiation. Therefore, compared with other nanoparticles using solo PTA or PDA, [41, 42] the dual-mode phototherapy antibacterial treatment of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs achieved high antibacterial effect while avoiding the high temperature associated with continuous photothermal therapy that could damage the surrounding normal tissues and cells, as well as the side effects of continuous photodynamic therapy. In addition, the efficient inhibition of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs against antibiotic-resistant bacteria has a great potential to overcome multi-drug resistance in bacteria by comparison with other reported antibacterial particles [43, 44].

Fig. 6

a CFU for AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus of control group without any treatment, bacterial in PBS that exposed to daylight for 1 h (10 mW cm−2) followed by NIR irradiation for 5 min (795 nm, 2.5 W cm−2), NGO-BSA-AIE NPs that presented in a dark environment or irradiated with light/laser. Quatitative results of CFU of b AMOr E. coli and c AMOr S. aureus. Significant differences between every two groups (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk (*)

Afterwards, we further evidence the antimicrobial behavior of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs by SEM and CLSM. As shown in Fig. 7, the bacteria treated with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs were observed to exhibit the same smooth cell membrane margins and intact bacterial morphology as control group (Fig. 7a, f), while the morphology of the bacteria changed slightly upon daylight or NIR laser irradiation, with part of bacterial deformed and collapsed (indicated by the red arrow). More interestingly, AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus treated with the NGO-BSA-AIE NPs were found to show significant deformation with their cell membranes completely collapse after exposure to both light irradiation, verifying high antibacterial effect under dual-model phototherapy.

Fig. 7

SEM images of AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus treated with PBS (a, f) and NGO-BSA-AIE NPs that presented in a dark environment (b, g), irradiated with daylight (c, h), irradiated with 795 nm NIR laser (d, i) and irradiated with daylight followed by 795 nm NIR laser (e, j). Scale bars: 200 nm

Likewise, similar result was observed via CLSM (Additional file 1: Figure S5a, b). The survival of bacteria were evaluated by acridine orange (AO) and ethidium bromide (EB) stains. AO was empolyed to stain living bacteria and produce green fluorescence, while EB was utilized to stain dead bacteria and produce red fluorescence. As expected, the bacteria (AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus) in the control group showed green fluorescence entirely, while the bacteria incubated with the NGO-BSA-AIE NPs irradiated with daylight and NIR laser almost presented red fluorescence, confirming significant antibacterial efficiency. These results certified that NGO-BSA-AIE NPs can achieve more efficacious bacteriostatic effect under collaborative dual-mode phototherapy.

Bacterial imaging

AIEgen was supposed to be applied as bacterial tracer because of its red/NIR emission characteristics. The feasibility of the proposed NGO-BSA-AIE NPs as potential bacterial tracer was verfied by CLSM measurements on bacteria (AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus). As shown in Fig. 8, NGO-BSA-AIE NPs appeared to be internalized into bacteria, and red fluorescence of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs was present in the bacterial cytoplasm, confirming that the proposed NGO-BSA-AIE NPs have great potential as fluorescent reporters for bacterial imaging, which is beneficial for observing the of bacterial distribution. In order to further understand the interaction between NGO-BSA-AIE NPs and cells, we conducted CLSM measurement for the eukaryotic cells (L929 cells) incubated with the proposed NGO-BSA-AIE NPs. As shown in Additional file 1: Figure S6, consistent with the experimental results of bacterial imaging, NGO-BSA-AIE NPs were clearly observed to be internalized into L929 cells.

Fig. 8

Intracellular distribution observed by CLSM of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs in AMOr E. coli and AMOr S. aureus. Scale bars: 5 μm

Biocompatibility evaluation

Obviously, the biocompatibility of antibacterial agents is the major concern for their practical applications, especially the cytotoxicity to normal cells [45]. Herein, cytotoxicity of different concentrations of NGO BSA-AIE NPs on fibroblast L929 was tested by commercially available MTT assays. As shown in Fig. 9, even if the concentration of AIEgen was increased to 10 μg/mL (the concentration we used for antibacteria study), the cell viability was still above 85%. Therefore, the proposed NGO-BSA-AIE NPs exhibited low cytotoxicity, thereby indicating its intriguing potential in biomedical practical applications. Moreover, compared to other high cytotoxic and proinflammatory antibacterial nanoparticles such as cationic polymers [7, 8] and Au, Ag nanoparticles, [9, 10] etc., the experiment results demonstrated that NGO-BSA-AIE NPs have the advantage of exhibiting a high antibacterial effect at the pathological site but still maintaining good biocompatibility in normal cells.

Fig. 9

Cell viability assay of L929 cells treated with different concentrations of AIEgen of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs


In summary, we have fabricated a novel antibacterial nanoparticle composed of NGO, BSA and AIEgen through a simple nanoprecipitation method. NGO-BSA-AIE NPs can produce moderate amount of heat under NIR laser irradiation and produce abundant ROS under daylight to destroy bacteria. NGO-BSA-AIE NPs showed high and controlled antibacterial efficiency, as well as good biocompatibility. The antibacterial efficiency of NGO-BSA-AIE NPs after exposure to daylight and NIR irradiation was both over 99%, but low cytotoxicity was found in the dark condition. In addition, due to the NIR emission characteristics of AIEgen, the bacteria treated with NGO-BSA-AIE NPs showed red fluorescence under CLSM, demonstrating that the NPs can be applied in the field of bacterial tracer. Hence, the proposed NGO-BSA-AIE NPs provided an important platform for the synergistic bacteriostatic effect through photodynamic and photothermal therapy, as well as NIR image tracer in biomedical applications.

Availability of data and materials

All data and material are included in the article and its additional files.



nano graphene oxide




bovine serum albumin


aggregation-induced emission fluorogen

AMOr :





reactive oxygen species


photothermal antibacterial


photodynamic antibacterial




2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate




colony forming units


X-ray diffraction


Fourier transform infrared


scanning electron microscopy


dynamic light scattering


confocal laser scanning microscopy


acridine orange


ethidium bromide


3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide


  1. 1.

    Sun M, Qu A, Hao C, Wu X, Xu L, Xu C, Kuang H. Chiral upconversion heterodimers for quantitative analysis and bioimaging of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vivo. Adv Mater. 2018;30:e1804241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Galvan DD, Yu Q. Surface-enhanced raman scattering for rapid detection and characterization of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:e1701335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ren S, Boo C, Guo N, Wang S, Elimelech M, Wang Y. Photocatalytic reactive ultrafiltration membrane for removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes from wastewater effluent. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:8666–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yang Y, He P, Wang Y, Bai H, Wang S, Xu JF, Zhang X. Supramolecular radical anions triggered by bacteria in situ for selective photothermal therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:16239–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen S, Chen Q, Li Q, An J, Sun P, Ma J, Gao H. Biodegradable synthetic antimicrobial with aggregation-induced emissive luminogens for temporal antibacterial activity and facile bacteria detection. Chem Mater. 2018;30:1782–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alonso A, Muñoz-Berbel X, Vigués N, Rodríguez-Rodríguez R, Macanás J, Muñoz M, Mas J, Muraviev DN. Superparamagnetic Ag@Co-nanocomposites on granulated cation exchange polymeric matrices with enhanced antibacterial activity for the environmentally safe purification of water. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23:2450–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ding X, Duan S, Ding X, Liu R, Xu F-J. Versatile antibacterial materials: an emerging arsenal for combatting bacterial pathogens. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1802140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lin J, Chen X, Chen C, Hu J, Zhou C, Cai X, Wang W, Zheng C, Zhang P, Cheng J, et al. Durably antibacterial and bacterially antiadhesive cotton fabrics coated by cationic fluorinated polymers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:6124–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bar-Ilan O, Albrecht RM, Fako VE, Furgeson DY. Toxicity assessments of multisized gold and silver nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos. Small. 2009;5:1897–910.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xiong Y, Brunson M, Huh J, Huang A, Coster A, Wendt K, Fay J, Qin D. The role of surface chemistry on the toxicity of ag nanoparticles. Small. 2013;9:2628–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tan X, Wang J, Pang X, Liu L, Sun Q, You Q, Tan F, Li N. Indocyanine green-loaded silver nanoparticle@polyaniline core/shell theranostic nanocomposites for photoacoustic/near-infrared fluorescence imaging-guided and single-light-triggered photothermal and photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:34991–5003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang YY, Wang WL, Shen XC, Zhou B, Chen T, Guo ZX, Wen CC, Jiang BP, Liang H. Combination-responsive MoO3-x hybridized hyaluronic acid hollow nanospheres for cancer phototheranostics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:42088–101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Luo G-F, Chen W-H, Lei Q, Qiu W-X, Liu Y-X, Cheng Y-J, Zhang X-Z. A Triple-collaborative strategy for high-performance tumor therapy by multifunctional mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:4339–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yu S, Li G, Liu R, Ma D, Xue W. Dendritic Fe3O4@poly(dopamine)@PAMAM nanocomposite as controllable NO-releasing material: a synergistic photothermal and NO antibacterial study. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1707440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li Yuan, Tan Lei, Cui Zhenduo, Yang Xianjin, Zheng Yufeng, Yeung Kelvin Wai Kwok, Chu Paul K, Shuilin Wu. Rapid sterilization and accelerated wound healing using Zn2+ and graphene oxide modified g-C3N4 under dual light irradiation. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1800299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li L, Liu Y, Hao P, Wang Z, Fu L, Ma Z, Zhou J. PEDOT nanocomposites mediated dual-modal photodynamic and photothermal targeted sterilization in both NIR I and II window. Biomaterials. 2015;41:132–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gao DY, Ji X, Wang JL, Wang YT, Li DL, Liu YB, Chang KW, Qu JL, Zheng J, Yuan Z. Engineering a protein-based nanoplatform as an antibacterial agent for light activated dual-modal photothermal and photodynamic therapy of infection in both the NIR I and II windows. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:732–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Li M, Yang X, Ren J, Qu K, Qu X. Using graphene oxide high near-infrared absorbance for photothermal treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Adv Mater. 2012;24:1722–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pan J, Yang Y, Fang W, Liu W, Le K, Xu D, Li X. Fluorescent phthalocyanine–graphene conjugate with enhanced NIR absorbance for imaging and multi-modality therapy. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2018;1:2785–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ran X, Du Y, Wang Z, Wang H, Pu F, Ren J, Qu X. Hyaluronic acid-templated Ag nanoparticles/graphene oxide composites for synergistic therapy of bacteria infection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:19717–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Diez-Pascual AM, Diez-Vicente AL. Poly(propylene fumarate)/polyethylene glycol-modified graphene oxide nanocomposites for tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:17902–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dellieu L, Lawarée E, Reckinger N, Didembourg C, Letesson JJ, Sarrazin M, Deparis O, Matroule JY, Colomer JF. Do CVD grown graphene films have antibacterial activity on metallic substrates? Carbon. 2015;84:310–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Fan Z, Liu B, Wang J, Zhang S, Lin Q, Gong P, Ma L, Yang S. A novel wound dressing based on Ag/graphene polymer hydrogel: effectively kill bacteria and accelerate wound healing. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24:3933–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hui L, Huang J, Chen G, Zhu Y, Yang L. Antibacterial property of graphene quantum dots (both source material and bacterial shape matter). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:20–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang K, Meng X, Cao Y, Yang Z, Dong H, Zhang Y, Lu H, Shi Z, Zhang X. Metal-organic framework nanoshuttle for synergistic photodynamic and low-temperature photothermal therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1804634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lu Y, Li L, Lin Z, Wang L, Lin L, Li M, Zhang Y, Yin Q, Li Q, Xia H. A new treatment modality for rheumatoid arthritis: combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy using Cu7.2S4 nanoparticles. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:e1800013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Li W, Peng J, Tan L, Wu J, Shi K, Qu Y, Wei X, Qian Z. Mild photothermal therapy/photodynamic therapy/chemotherapy of breast cancer by Lyp-1 modified docetaxel/IR820 co-loaded micelles. Biomaterials. 2016;106:119–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Feng Z, Liu X, Tan L, Cui Z, Yang X, Li Z, Zheng Y, Yeung KWK, Wu S. Electrophoretic deposited stable chitosan@MoS2 coating with rapid in situ bacteria-killing ability under dual-light irradiation. Small. 2018;14:e1704347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhu Z, Qian J, Zhao X, Qin W, Hu R, Zhang H, Li D, Xu Z, Tang BZ, He S. Stable and size-tunable aggregation-induced emission nanoparticles encapsulated with nanographene oxide and applications in three-photon fluorescence bioimaging. ACS Nano. 2016;10:588–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang H, Ma K, Xu B, Tian W. Tunable supramolecular interactions of aggregation-induced emission probe and graphene oxide with biomolecules: an approach toward ultrasensitive label-free and “Turn-On” DNA sensing. Small. 2016;12:6613–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lu H, Zheng Y, Zhao X, Wang L, Ma S, Han X, Xu B, Tian W, Gao H. Highly efficient far red/near-infrared solid fluorophores: aggregation-induced emission, intramolecular charge transfer, twisted molecular conformation, and bioimaging applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55:155–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Guan Y, Lu H, Li W, Zheng Y, Jiang Z, Zou J, Gao H. Near-infrared triggered upconversion polymeric nanoparticles based on aggregation-induced emission and mitochondria targeting for photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:26731–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Huang Y, Chen Q, Lu H, An J, Zhu H, Yan X, Li W, Gao H. Near-infrared AIEgen-functionalized and diselenide-linked oligo-ethylenimine with self-sufficing ROS to exert spatiotemporal responsibility for promoted gene delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:6660–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hu X, Tian H, Jiang W, Song A, Li Z, Luan Y. Rational design of IR820-and Ce6-based versatile micelle for single NIR laser-induced imaging and dual-modal phototherapy. Small. 2018;14:e1802994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sun X, Zebibula A, Dong X, Zhang G, Zhang D, Qian J, He S. Aggregation-induced emission nanoparticles encapsulated with PEGylated nano graphene oxide and their applications in two-photon fluorescence bioimaging and photodynamic therapy in vitro and in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:25037–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Li Z, Yang T, Lin C, Li Q, Liu S, Xu F, Wang H, Cui X. Sonochemical synthesis of hydrophilic drug loaded multifunctional bovine serum albumin nanocapsules. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:19390–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zeng Q, Zhang R, Zhang T, Xing D. H2O2-responsive biodegradable nanomedicine for cancer-selective dual-modal imaging guided precise photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials. 2019;207:39–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Qin W, Ding D, Liu J, Yuan WZ, Hu Y, Liu B, Tang BZ. Biocompatible nanoparticles with aggregation-induced emission characteristics as far-red/near-infrared fluorescent bioprobes for in vitro and in vivo imaging applications. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:771–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Dikin DA, Stankovich S, Zimney EJ, Piner RD, Dommett GHB, Evmenenko G, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS. Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature. 2007;448:457–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tian T, Shi X, Cheng L, Luo Y, Dong Z, Gong H, Xu L, Zhong Z, Peng R, Liu Z. Graphene-based nanocomposite as an effective, multifunctional, and recyclable antibacterial agent. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6:8542–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tao B, Lin C, Deng Y, Zhang Y, Cai K. Copper-nanoparticle-embedded hydrogel for killing bacteria and promoting wound healing with photothermal therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:2534–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Xu ZQ, Wang X, Liu X, Cui Z, Yang X, Yeung KWK, Chung JC, Chu PK, Wu S. Tannic acid/Fe3+/Ag nanofilm exhibiting superior photodynamic and physical antibacterial activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:39657–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ping L, Sun S, Dong A, Hao Y, Shi S, Sun Z, Ge G, Chen Y. Developing of a novel antibacterial agent by functionalization of graphene oxide with guanidine polymer with enhanced antibacterial activity. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;355:446–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kellici S, Acord J, Vaughn A, Power NP, Morgan DJ, Heil T, Facq SP, Lampronti GI. Calixarene assisted rapid synthesis of silver-graphene nanocomposites with enhanced antibacterial activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:19038–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wu Y, Long Y, Li QL, Han S, Ma J, Yang YW, Gao H. Layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembled biohybrid nanomaterials for efficient antibacterial applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:17255–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21674080), 131 talents program of Tianjin, Distinguished Professor of Tianjin, the Leading Talents Program of the Tianjin Educational Committee, Key program of Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 18JCZDJC37700), and Training Project of Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Tianjin (TD13-5020) for financial support.

Author information




HG designed the topic and the ideas of this research. YXZ conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. HF and DEL offered help for the analysis of experimental data. YXZ and JXA co-wrote paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jinxia An or Hui Gao.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1.

Additional experimental section and additional figures.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Fu, H., Liu, D. et al. Construction of biocompatible bovine serum albumin nanoparticles composed of nano graphene oxide and AIEgen for dual-mode phototherapy bacteriostatic and bacterial tracking. J Nanobiotechnol 17, 104 (2019).

Download citation


  • Nano graphene oxide
  • Aggregation-induced emission
  • Dual-mode phototherapy bacteriostatic
  • Bacterial tracking
  • Biocompatibility