Skip to main content
Download PDF

Smart nanoparticles and microbeads for interventional embolization therapy of liver cancer: state of the art

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 21, Article number: 42 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

The process of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization is characterized by the ability to accurately deliver chemotherapy drugs with minimal systemic side effects and has become the standard treatment for unresectable intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, this treatment option still has much room for improvement, one of which may be the introduction of nanomaterials, which exhibit unique functions and can be applied to in vivo tumor imaging and therapy. Several biodegradable and multifunctional nanomaterials and nanobeads have recently been developed and applied in the locoregional treatment of hepatocellular cancer. This review explores recent developments and findings in relation to micro-nano medicines in transarterial therapy for HCC, emerging strategies to improve the efficacy of delivering nano-based medicines, and expounding prospects for clinical applications of nanomaterials.

Introduction

Primary liver cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an estimated incidence of  >  1 million cases by 2025 [1]. Furthermore, HCC accounts for > 80% of primary liver cancers worldwide, with incidence rates of HCC in the USA having increased two to three times in the past three decades [1, 2]. Primary liver cancer is also the fourth most common malignant tumor in China [3], indicating the severity this cancer has on the life and health of the Chinese people. Currently, the main clinical treatment methods for liver cancer include surgical resection, liver transplantation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), ablation, and systemic treatment (targeted therapy, immunotherapy, et al.) [4]. It is important to recognize that 75% of the blood supply of a healthy liver originates from the portal vein, while the blood supply in an individual with primary liver cancer originates from the hepatic artery [5], compared with systemic chemotherapy, transarterial treatment has the prominent advantage of accurately delivering chemotherapy drugs and minimizing systemic side effects. Therefore, TACE has become the standard treatment for unresectable intermediate HCC and accurately treats cancer lesions with high safety [6].

Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) is the process of mixing chemotherapeutic drugs and ethiodized oil into an emulsion for embolization. However, the ethiodized oil is liquid and its particle size is not fixed, meaning it often has adverse reactions during application which can include embolization to normal liver tissues, entrance into non-target organs, with the ethiodized oil also obscuring arterially-enhancing tumors and limiting the detection of residual tumors. Therefore, drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) was developed to overcome these defects. Compared with cTACE, DEB-TACE allows for sustained and stable drug release [7], causing the local tumor to reach a higher blood concentration and a significant reduction in drug-related toxicity and hepatotoxicity [8].

However, TACE still has much room for improvement, and many smart nanomaterials with functions of detection, degradation, and synergistic therapy have been developed in recent years (Fig. 1). Herein, this review introduced the recent developments and findings of micro-nano medicines in transarterial therapy for HCC, the emerging strategies to improve the efficacy of delivering nano-based medicines and expound prospects for clinical applications of nanomaterials.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Smart nanoparticles and microbeads for tumor interventional embolization therapy

Full size image

Current technology and design of TACE microspheres

Biodegradable microspheres

Despite cTACE being recommended as the first-line palliative treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, the use of ethiodized oil mixed with chemotherapeutic drugs can result in a higher incidence of systemic, adverse effects on tumors [9]. Drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) provides an attractive alternative regimen, with experimental and clinical studies indicating that DEB-TACE is associated with a better objective response, disease control, and lower complication risk compared to cTACE treatment [10,11,12].

Benefits of degradable nanomaterials

Currently, the common commercially available microspheres on the market are mainly composed of non-biodegradable polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [13]. However, these non-biodegradable microspheres have some limitations: (1) the permanent embolism in non-target arteries causes liver tissue infarction or gallbladder infarction [14]; (2) non-biodegradable microspheres cause permanent obstruction, which would inhibit effective retreatment following the recurrence of HCC [15]. Compared to non-biodegradable microspheres, the advantages of degradable microspheres include a potential reduction in the occurrence of the post-embolization syndrome, avoidance of ischemia-induced neoangiogenesis [16], and the temporary protection of normal liver parenchyma during TACE [17].

Major classes of degradable nanomaterials

At present, degradable microspheres have become the focus of embolic agent development, with common microspheres including chitosan-cellulose microspheres, polyethylene glycol methacrylate (PEGMA) microspheres, poly(D,L,-lactic acid) (PDLA, PLLA) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres[18, 19].

When looking at chitosan-cellulose microspheres, chitin and chitosan can be harvested from the shells of crustaceans and are degraded by lysozymes that are present in the human body. They can be used as carriers for chemoembolization due to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and nontoxic characteristics [20]. Chitosan magnetic microparticles (CMM) are a special class of chitosan microparticles that have been developed and widely applied in the delivery of anticancer drugs [21]. About liver cancer, CMM would enter via the hepatic artery, and stops at the targeted tissue through the application of an external magnetic field. When further looking at chitosan nanoparticles, Li et al. [22] indicated that the encapsulation of carboplatin into chitosan magnetic microparticles, or carboplatin-Fe@C-loaded chitosan nanoparticles, have a dual role–drug carrier and hyperthermia.

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), or PLGA, is a hydrophobic and degradable polymer. It undergoes hydrolysis in the body to produce lactic acid, and glycolic acid [23], which are biodegradable metabolite monomers and easily metabolized by the body. There is very minimal systematic toxicity when using PLGA [24], and the improved antitumor efficacy of drug-loaded PLGA microspheres in transarterial chemotherapy has also been well documented [25].

Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials

Ethiodized oil and DEB can cause catheter blockage due to their adhesiveness, obstructing transcatheter delivery of the drug and subsequent treatment. In recent years, some new intelligent response embolic agents have been developed to counteract these shortcomings. These include thermo-sensitive hydrogels, which are free-flowing liquids with a lower critical solution and can be transformed into a gel at physiological temperatures in vivo [26]. Additionally, stimulus response nanoparticles can respond to the high acidity [27], and the presence of reactive oxygen species and reducing substances that characterize the tumor microenvironment (TME) undergo a transformation of phase state or aggregation state to achieve vascular resistance [28].

Redox-responsive

In O2-dependent therapies, such as photodynamic therapy (PDT), H2O2 has been used as the substrate of O2 generation to increase therapeutic effect [29]. At the same time, antioxidant glutathione (GSH) also has a high concentration in tumors [30] and plays an important role in the increased resistance of tumorigenic cells to treatment [31]. Therefore, it is of great significance to design a nano platform that combines GSH consumption with ROS generation. One example is MnO2 nanosheets designed by Wang et al. that was used as the carrier for a benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD) (MnO2/BPD) [32]. Under the conditions of high levels of GSH and H2O2, the nanosheets were quickly reduced to large amounts of Mn2+ and BPD, resulting in the generation of ROS and the depletion of GSH which inhibited tumor growth and improved the therapeutic efficacy of PDT (Fig. 2A). The enhanced effect of PDT could be able to kill tumor vascular endothelial cells and amplify the effect of the tumor embolization effect by inducing the coagulation cascade.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Stimulus-responsive nanoparticles for tumor embolization therapy. A The MnO2/BPD fabrication and thrombosis formation induced by Interventional PDT. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [32]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. B The fabrication and mechanism of the thermo-sensitive hydrogel. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [35]. Copyright 2014, Elsevier Ltd. C The mechanism of pH-sensitive nanoparticles for tumor embolization therapy. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [35]. Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society

Full size image

Thermo-sensitive

Thermo-sensitive hydrogels are three-dimensional hydrophilic polymer networks that contain considerable water content and are well-regarded as nontoxic and biocompatible polymers [33]. They have been widely studied for potential applications in biomedicine and drug delivery biomaterial [34].

Among many materials, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) has been widely used. PNIPAAm exhibits a reversible phase transition in response to a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of 32 °C (Fig. 2B) [34, 35]. Huang et al. [36] investigated thermos-sensitive liquid embolic hydrogels containing poloxamer 407 as liquid embolic agents for TACE therapy relating to liver cancer. These composite hydrogels were injectable at ambient temperature (< 25 °C) and transformed into a gel at body temperature (37 °C) [37]. The composite hydrogels demonstrated successful occlusion within the VX2 liver cancer model. However, PNIPAAm can be cytotoxic due to the presence of unreacted monomers or toxic moieties arising under the hydrolysis of chains [38]. Alternative temperature-sensitive gels with biocompatibility have been designed to avoid this shortcoming: poly(N-vinylcaprolactam) (PVCL), poly(vinyl methyl ether) (PVME), poly(N, N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA), etc. [39].

pH-sensitivity

The extracellular region of liver tumors is acidic due to excessive glycolysis and poor perfusion [40]. Therefore, pH-sensitive injectable hydrogels have recently emerged as a promising approach for selective drug delivery to tumor tissues. For hydrogels with specific acidic and/or basic pendant groups, water uptake by such polymers mainly takes place due to the pH of the external solution. Moreover, given the presence of specific charged substances in the structure of the swelling network, pH-sensitive polymer hydrogels will release drugs based on the specific pH of the external solution [34]. When looking at the applications of PCL-PEG-SM, a copolymer comprised of poly(ε-caprolactone), sulfamethazine, and poly (ethylene glycol), it was loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) and underwent a sol-to-gel phase transition through the variation of environmental pH to create a gel region that embodied the physiological conditions (pH 7.4) and low pH conditions at a tumor site (pH 6.5–7.0) [41]. This hydrogel successfully embolized a hepatic tumor of a VX2 rabbit tumor model while maintaining sustained release of DOX. Furthermore, an acidic pH-triggered drug-eluting nanocomposite containing a pH-responsive additive (pH-ADT) has been developed for TACE (Fig. 2C). pH-ADT can be formed as a stable solid state at a neutral pH. An acidic environment (< pH 7.4) destabilizes the pH-ADT because of the ionization of imidazole functional groups, which causes a phase transition of the pH-ADT into a charged water-soluble form [42]. It is demonstrated that the drug release could be triggered by a response to the acidic microenvironment caused by embolization-induced hypoxia.

Multifunctional nanoparticles for synergistic cancer therapy

There are still some limitations of TACE, such as incomplete embolization of the supply arteries of the tumor, which may lead to tumor progression and recurrence [43]. Embolization, combined with multiple therapies, such as hyperthermia, radiation, and ablation are potential ways to enhance the therapeutic effect of liver cancer.

TACE in combination with thermal ablation

Ablation of liver cancer is a form of treatment that utilizes the guidance of medical imaging technology to target the tumor foci and locally kill the tumor tissue directly through physical or chemical methods [44]. Ablation therapy is mainly applicable to patients with BCLC stage A who are not candidates for surgical intervention [45]. Forms of treatment include radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, absolute ethanol injection therapy, cryoablation, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), laser ablation, irreversible electroporation, etc. [46]. HIFU is a non-invasive operation that focuses high-intensity ultrasound energy to ablate and destroy the tumor tissue and does no damage to normal tissues in the acoustic-propagating path [47]. However, the efficiency of HIFU for deep-seated liver cancer is low. The delivery of an ablation sensitizer to the tumor site through the hepatic artery can increase the effect of ablation on tumor cells.

Therefore, Fe3O4-integrated PLGA capsules were developed as multifunctional nanosystems and ultrasound synergistic agents for transarterial chemoembolization, diagnostic imaging, and enhanced HIFU (Fig. 3A) [48]. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), which function as microwave-sensitive material, absorb microwave energy through unpaired electrons (Fe2+, Fe3+). When these excited electrons return to the ground state, they release phonons that allow for the conversion of microwave energy into heat energy [49]. In a microwave field, SPIONs in microspheres can rapidly increase a high temperature to kill tumors and further induce ferroptosis of tumor cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Synergic therapeutic nanoparticles for tumor embolization therapy. A The preparation process of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and its TACE treatment mode. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2020, Springer Nature. B Schematic illustration of DOX-encapsulated and near-infrared (NIR)-responsible nanoparticles preparation and chemo-photothermal treatment of orthotopic liver cancer. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [55]. Copyright 2021, Elsevier Ltd. C Schematic illustration of 131I microbeads for radio-chemoembolization. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [63]. Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society

Full size image

TACE in combination with hyperthermia

The use of local hyperthermia to induce the death of cancer cells can enhance the effect of chemotherapy. Local hyperthermia includes arterial embolization hyperthermia (AEH). Treatment at temperatures between 40 and 44 °C is cytotoxic for cells in an environment with a low pH and low oxygen partial pressure, due to insufficient blood perfusion within tumor tissue caused by embolization [50]. Moreover, the effects of chemotherapy drugs are enhanced at an increased temperature, and it has been shown for DOX that the addition of hyperthermia to chemotherapy can counteract drug resistance [51].

Magnetic hyperthermia

Magnetic hyperthermia is cancer-targeted hyperthermia that is implemented through the use of basic principles of TACE in conjunction with an external magnetic field to localize magnetic material to a tumor site, which results in increased temperatures at the site of the magnetic material; normal tissues do not generate heat due to the absence of ferromagnetic materials. Recently, magnetic microparticles have been investigated for embolization and hyperthermia. It is demonstrated that treatment with PLGA microsphere containing Fe3O4 particles causes tumor necrosis and suppresses associated tumor angiogenesis in VX2 liver tumors [52]. More importantly, the phase transformation of PLGA from the glassy state to the rubbery state, which is induced by magnetic heating effects enhanced microparticle aggregation, subsequently reducing the impact on liver function. Zhao et al. [53] investigated a magnetic drug carrier system that contained micron-sized iron powder, barium ferrite (BaFe12O19), and carbon-coated iron nanocrystals (CCINs). BaFe12O19 is not magnetized before the nanoparticles are injected into the hepatic artery. However, BaFe12O19 has strong magnetic properties when magnetized under the action of an external magnetic field, which attracted iron powder and CCINs to form large particles in an external static magnetic field after they were infused into the liver tumor. As a result, the magnetic nanoparticles thoroughly embolized the supplying artery of the tumor. The magnetic induction temperature could reach a maximum level in one minute to kill residual cancer cells in an external alternating magnetic field. More importantly, the powder particles adhered to adjacent tissues after AEH, allowing the use of these clumps for repeated hyperthermia. Pure iron is 2.6 times the magnetic intensity of saturated magnetic. Therefore, Li et al. [22] designed magnetic microparticles based on pure iron which possesses higher saturation magnetization, and the tumor temperature may be controlled by adjusting nanoparticle concentration and magnetic field current strength.

Photothermal therapy (PTT)

Photothermal nanoparticles can be used for the PTT of tumor cells by converting absorbed light energy into heat energy under near-infrared light [54]. Gold nanomaterials, CuS nanocrystals (Fig. 3B), polydopamine, carbon nanotubes, and graphene have all been reported as the main PTT agents [55, 56]. Specifically, polymers such as polydopamine, with upper critical solution temperature (UCST) properties are perfectly suitable for the construction of drug delivery platforms to achieve a controllable release pattern [56]. The solubility and drug release rate of photothermal microspheres increase substantially when a specific temperature threshold is achieved, which facilitates hyperthermia and chemotherapy to function simultaneously. The co-delivery of photothermal nanoparticles and chemoembolization drugs through hepatic arteries can be used to mediate simultaneous PTT and chemoembolization therapy of cancer cells. In addition, Hollow Gold Nanospheres (HAuNS) are a novel class of gold nanoparticles capable of converting absorbed photographic energy into heat [57]. Near-infrared laser irradiation both elevates the temperature of the treated tissue and destroys the nanospheres, promoting the release of the cytotoxic drugs payload directly into the tumor [58, 59]. However, the cost of noble metals such as gold is high, therefore MoS2, a non-noble metal-based PTT agent serves as an alternative with lower cost, stronger light absorption in near-infrared regions, higher photothermal conversion efficiency, and better biocompatibility [60].

TACE in combination with selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT)

SIRT is a catheter-based procedure that delivers internal radiation to liver tumors via the hepatic arterial vasculature in the form of microspheres or ethiodized oil. Among the more promising of these radiotherapeuticals are microspheres. Only three types of microspheres are commercially available: Yttrium-90 (90Y)-resin microspheres (Sir-Spheres®), 90Y-glass microspheres (Therasphere®), and holmium-166 (166Ho)-PLLA microspheres (QuiremSpheres®) [61]. As well as these microbeads, other radionuclide labeled nano-based or polymeric microspheres are currently being developed. An overview is given in Table 1.

Table 1 Radiolabeled microspheres in clinics nowadays
Full size table

90 Y and 166 Ho

90Y is a pure beta-emitter with a half-life of 64 h and a maximum energy of 2.27 MeV [67]. Since 90Y released beta energy has a maximum penetration range of 11 mm within soft tissue [68], embolization microspheres containing 90Y are injected intra-arterially to kill tumor cells. However, the two kinds of 90Y-microspheres on the market have their disadvantages. The high density of glass microspheres increases the chance of premature intravascular settling and falling back into the gastroduodenal thus giving rise to undesirable side effects [61]. Though the density of resin microspheres is low, the activity of resin microspheres is 50 Bq per sphere, which means a greater number of administered spheres is required to deliver the same radiation dose [69], resulting in a greater likelihood of non-target embolization and particle reflux into unintended vasculature.

Besides, it is important to recognize that preprocedural hepatic arterial mapping is standard and necessary before 90Y radioembolization to maximize efficacy and reduce potential nontarget embolization. In this process, Technetium-99 m macro aggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) is injected in the arterial territory of the targeted tumors to evaluate lung shunt fraction by nuclear imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as well as to avoid the inadvertent deposition of microspheres in organs other than the liver [70]. However, the size of 99mTc-MAA particles is slightly smaller than that of commercially available 90Y microspheres, which may induce an overestimation of the lung shunt with 99mTc-MAA [69]. Therefore new imageable microbeads with proper density, and high specific activity are the focus of research and development, and nano microspheres are the most ideal material. For instance, the PLLA microbeads are not only biodegradable but also have a density comparable to blood [69]. More importantly, 166Ho provides an alternative to 90Y and possesses potentially superior imaging characteristics, specifically in relation to its paramagnetic properties which potentially allow for using MRI, and better visibility by SPECT due to its gamma-ray emission (81 keV, 62%) [71]. So that 166Ho-PLLA microspheres can be located and quantitative on MRI, and the safety and effectiveness of microspheres have been verified in several clinical trials [72,73,74]. Some ongoing clinical research will further provide new knowledge relating to dosimetry and personalized patient treatment [75].

Iodine-131 ( 131 I)

131I-labeled ethiodized oil has also been used for SIRT therapy of HCC. 131I emits both β and γ rays with a half-life of 8 days, and its β particles have a maximum energy of 0.6 MeV and a maximum path length in the tissue of 2.3 mm [76]. Radioactive lipiodol accumulates in cancer tissues and decreases irradiation damage to non-cancer tissues due to its selectively deposits in nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, in a representative clinical study of 15 patients, the poor tumor retention of 131I-ethiodized oil results in ectopic embolization in the lungs, which causes adverse effects such as interstitial pneumonia [77]. Therefore, slowly degrading or nondegradable multifunctional embolic agents with stable 131I-labeling were developed to increase tumor-specificity and produce a synergetic antitumor effect at a low dose (Fig. 3C) [63].

Rhenium-188 ( 188 Re)

188Re decays with a half-life of 17 h to stable 188Os by emission of β particles with maximum energies of 2.12 MeV [78]. 188Re with a shorter half-life and similar energy of β rays compared to 90Y, is a promising radionuclide proposed for TARE of hepatic tumors. It also emits 155 keV gamma emission when being used for imaging [79]. In addition, 188Re can be obtained from188W/188Re generators [76], which is convenient for research and routine clinical use. Human serum albumin (HSA) microsphere can serve as an ideal radionuclide carrier for 188Re in liver cancer treatment due to its high mechanical stability and chemical stability to resist hydrolysis and radiolysis [64]. Lipid nanocapsules (LNC), a nano vector with biomimetic properties, are also a potential 188Re nanocarrier as it modifies the biodistribution of entrapped therapeutic agents [65, 80].

Additionally, because the half-life of 188Re is as short as 16.9 h, it cannot be transported and stored for a long time. Furthermore, the injection activity of 188Re must also be around 2.8 times higher than that of 90Y to reach an equivalent treatment effect, which exposes physicians and patients to more radiation [81]. Currently, preliminary results of the phase 1 188Re-lipiodol I clinical trial have clearly shown that 188Re-lipiodol displays remarkable biodistribution characteristics and tumor targeting, as well as the highest in-vivo stability among all radiolabeled Lipiodol compounds reported to date [82].

Embolization in combination with targeted drugs

Molecular targeting drugs, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as lenvatinib, sorafenib, and so on are the first line of treatment in systematic therapy for liver cancer [83, 84]. However, systemic exposure to TKIs following oral intake can lead to severe side effects due to a lack of specificity [85]. In addition, the ischemia and hypoxic conditions induced by transarterial embolization also contribute to angiogenesis in the periphery of the tumor. Furthermore, studies have indicated that an increase in serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and serum hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1alpha) levels after transarterial embolization have been correlated to poorer patient outcomes [86]. Therefore, embolization combined with the local administration of antiangiogenic agents is a new therapeutic strategy. Sorafenib is a potent multikinase inhibitor that inhibits angiogenesis by utilizing the targeted blockage of VEGF and platelet-derived growth factor receptors while also inhibiting cell proliferation [87]. Compared with traditional TACE, the treatment with embolic microspheres loaded with sorafenib exhibits remarkable anticancer therapeutic effects, with low expression of CD34, an angiogenic marker, in tumor tissues [88]. Similar to sorafenib, two other antiangiogenic agents of clinical interest, sunitinib and vandetanib, can be efficiently loaded into beads [89, 90].

New strategies for TACE

The hypoxia and low acid environment of tumors caused by embolization may lead to tumor recurrence and progression. Accordingly, it is very important to design particulate systems that can combat post-embolization hypoxia and prevent neoangiogenesis to maximize the therapeutic responses of TACE in HCC.

TACE, combined with the optimization of the tumor microenvironment is a new strategy for enhancing the treatment of HCC. Zhang et al. [91] presented CaCO3-containing embolic agents to improve cancer treatment via tumor pH neutralization because CaCO3 is pH-sensitive. Drug-loaded CaCO3 particles can not only release drugs in response to low pH but also cause a significant increase in intratumor pH and modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. Moreover, the overall morphology of microspheres after the decomposition of CaCO3 is not affected.

Drug-eluting embolic systems containing NaHCO3 were designed for the rapid release of drugs by CO2 gas generation in the slightly acidic TME while maintaining the particle structure for occlusion of tumor-feeding vessels [92, 93]. It is expected that the developed TME-responsive gas-generating microspheres can be efficiently applied to TACE.

Low oxygen levels are rarely observed in normal tissues, but hypoxic regions are common in tumors and contribute to chemotherapy resistance [94]. The interruption of blood supply during the TACE process also results in severe hypoxia of the tumor. Therefore, hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAP) such as TH-302 can be used for TME-targeted cancer therapy. TH-302 prodrugs can be rapidly converted into active components under hypoxic conditions of the TME to kill tumor cells [95]. PLGA microspheres have also been designed to deliver TH-302 and exert physical embolism of the blood supply of tumor tissue [96].

In addition, because most embolic microspheres passively target tumors due to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, the dose accumulated in other tumor sites is limited [97]. The addition of tumor vascular-specific destructors such as combretastatin A-4 phosphate disodium (CA4P) can increase the permeability of blood vessels and cell membranes, maximizing the accumulation of chemotherapy drugs in the tumor site, and further reducing toxic and side effects [58]. Additionally, because CA4P specifically blocks and destroys the blood vessels supplying tumors, it can inhibit the formation of new blood vessels.

Visualization of TACE agents

When looking at DEB-TACE visualization, the current method of visualization involves mixing the contrast media with microbead suspension, and it is difficult to observe the precise location of the embolization microsphere on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

The visualization of embolic microspheres and nanomaterials can provide real-time intraprocedural feedback and may remain detectable in follow-up imaging. Some new embolic microspheres, that are detectable by the addition of MRI contrast agents, have been recently introduced. SPIONs and gadolinium chelates are common contrast agents which are co-encapsulated for the MRI of microsphere delivery [98,99,100,101,102]. SPIONs are magnetic nanoparticles that have various characteristics such as magnetic targeting, biocompatibility, and degradability [103]. SPIONs can not only permit MRI detection given strong T2 and T2* relaxation effects but also allow for effective drug release [99]. PLG sorafenib iron oxide microspheres were developed for quantitative MRI, and the concentration of microspheres can be estimated by evaluating changes in tumor T2* values MRI [98]. In addition, microspheres containing drug-loaded temperature-sensitive liposomes, holmium ions (T2* contrast agent) and Gd (HPDO3A) (H2O)] (T1 contrast agent) to accomplish triggered drug release have also been reported [101].

It is still a challenge to evaluate the treatment effect after c-TACE via CT because of the high density of ethiodized oil. PLGA microbeads and 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA), a contrast agent for CT imaging, have been developed for locoregional delivery of sorafenib and lesion monitoring on follow-up CT imaging [104]. However, the synthesis of such copolymers is complicated, and there is a need for a universal method to economically and efficiently produce radiopaque DEBs. Tantalum nanoparticles (Ta NPs) have the potential to be an excellent non-iodinated contrast media due to their biocompatibility and excellent X-ray attenuation ability [105]. A one-step electrospray method was used to prepare intrinsic radiopaque calcium alginate microspheres loaded with tantalum nanoparticles [106]. These nanoparticles provided the real-time location of the embolic microspheres and exhibit excellent X-ray-visibility properties for up to 4 weeks.

3D vascular reconstruction can be carried out with the help of CT post-processing technology. MRI is the preferred imaging technology for evaluating the therapeutic efficacy of liver cancer. Together, both modalities offer significant individual and specific diagnosis data to physicians. Therefore, to obtain dual-modality imaging, an innovative strategy has been proposed to encapsulate nanoparticles as CT and MRI contrast into microspheres [107]. For example, Wei et al. [108] developed the magnetic embolic microspheres based on SPIONs with high density, which are detectable to both CT and MR. Additionally, gallium-based liquid metal nanoparticles have been used to realize CT/MRI dual-modality imaging, and a photothermal/photodynamic sensitizing unit for active drug release, and photothermal conversion [109].

Conclusions

Compared with traditional procedures and the use of microspheres in interventional embolization therapy in liver cancer, novel smart microspheres and nanoparticles exhibit unique advantages, including the employment of multidrug combinations to achieve synergistic treatment, the delivery of multiple drugs to limit hypoxia-induced angiogenesis, imaging capabilities for real-time and follow-up feedback, and potential biodegradability over time. Given these advantageous characteristics, these novel smart microspheres and nanoparticles will likely overtake traditional methods in future applications. With the rapid development of new synthetic microbeads and nanoparticles in TACE for the precise treatment of HCC, it may be possible to see TACE become much more effective with less harm to the patient in the not-so-distant future.

However, apart from a few radioembolization microspheres that are commercially and clinically available, such as QuiremSpheres [110], most of the studies on novel microspheres for interventional embolization are still in the stage of animal experiments. There are also still some limitations of nanomedicines: (1) Though most reported nanoplatforms have been indicated to possess good biocompatibility in animal models, consistency may not occur in human clinical trials. The detailed pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic analysis, drug biodistribution, and long-term assessment of toxicity in vivo should be taken into consideration in the period of treatment; (2) Realistic factors such as production cost and the production process of nanomedicines need to be considered. Large-scale manufacturing and the maintenance of batch-to-batch quality and reproducibility are required. The development of smart microbeads for TACE is still in the early stages and more preclinical studies need to be carried out in order to progress to clinical trials.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable, please refer to the original references.

References

  1. Llovet JM, Kelley RK, Villanueva A, Singal AG, Pikarsky E, Roayaie S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR. A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(10):589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou J, Sun H, Wang Z, Cong W, Wang J, Zeng M, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2020;9(6):682–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. General Office of National Health Commission. Standard for diagnosis and treatment criteria of primary liver cancer. J Clin Hepatol. 2022;38(2):288.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sutphin PD, Lamus D, Kalva SP, Li J, Corbin IR. Interventional radiologic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: from where we began to where we are going. In: Hoshida Y, editor. Hepatocellular carcinoma: translational precision medicine approaches. Cham: Humana Press; 2019. p. 169–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliveri RS, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Transarterial (chemo)embolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD004787

  7. Facciorusso A. Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: current state of the art. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(2):161–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lencioni R. Chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2012;1(1):41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Baere T, Arai Y, Lencioni R, Geschwind JF, Rilling W, Salem R, et al. Treatment of liver tumors with lipiodol TACE: technical recommendations from experts opinion. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(3):334–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bzeizi KI, Arabi M, Jamshidi N, Albenmousa A, Sanai FM, Al-Hamoudi W, et al. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization versus drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(24):6172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang ZS, Li HZ, Ma C, Xiao YD. Conventional versus drug-eluting beads chemoembolization for infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy and safety. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu B, Zhou J, Ling G, Zhu D, Long Q. CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads versus lipiodol transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term efficacy and safety study. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis AL, Gonzalez MV, Leppard SW, Brown JE, Stratford PW, Phillips GJ, et al. Doxorubicin eluting beads—1: effects of drug loading on bead characteristics and drug distribution. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(9):1691–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Z, Li G, Ai X, Luo B, Wen Y, Zhao Z, et al. Hepatic and biliary damage after transarterial chemoembolization for malignant hepatic tumors: incidence, diagnosis, treatment, outcome and mechanism. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;79(2):164–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giunchedi P, Maestri M, Gavini E, Dionigi P, Rassu G. Transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma—agents and drugs: an overview. Part 2. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10(6):799–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogl TJ, Zangos S, Eichler K, Yakoub D, Nabil M. Colorectal liver metastases: regional chemotherapy via transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic chemoperfusion: an update. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(4):1025–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pieper CC, Meyer C, Vollmar B, Hauenstein K, Schild HH, Wilhelm KE. Temporary arterial embolization of liver parenchyma with degradable starch microspheres (EmboCept®S) in a swine model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(2):435–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yavari K, Yeganeh E, Abolghasemi H. Production and characterization of 166Ho polylactic acid microspheres. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2016;59(1):24–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Louguet S, Verret V, Bédouet L, Servais E, Pascale F, Wassef M, et al. Poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate hydrolyzable microspheres for transient vascular embolization. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(3):1194–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sezer AD, Cevher E. Topical drug delivery using chitosan nano- and microparticles. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9(9):1129–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bai MY, Tang SL, Chuang MH, Wang TY, Hong PD. Evaluation of chitosan derivative microparticles encapsulating superparamagnetic iron oxide and doxorubicin as a pH-sensitive delivery carrier in hepatic carcinoma treatment: an in vitro comparison study. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li FR, Yan WH, Guo YH, Qi H, Zhou HX. Preparation of carboplatin-Fe@C-loaded chitosan nanoparticles and study on hyperthermia combined with pharmacotherapy for liver cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2009;25(5):383–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Su Y, Zhang B, Sun R, Liu W, Zhu Q, Zhang X, et al. PLGA-based biodegradable microspheres in drug delivery: recent advances in research and application. Drug Deliv. 2021;28(1):1397–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdul Rahim R, Jayusman PA, Muhammad N, Ahmad F, Mokhtar N, Naina Mohamed I, et al. Recent advances in nanoencapsulation systems using PLGA of bioactive phenolics for protection against chronic diseases. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):4962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SY, Choi JW, Lee JY, Kim DD, Kim HC, Cho HJ. Hyaluronic acid/doxorubicin nanoassembly-releasing microspheres for the transarterial chemoembolization of a liver tumor. Drug Deliv. 2018;25(1):1472–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Li X, Liu W, Ye G, Zhang B, Zhu D, Yao K, et al. Thermosensitive N-isopropylacrylamide-N-propylacrylamide-vinyl pyrrolidone terpolymers: synthesis, characterization and preliminary application as embolic agents. Biomaterials. 2005;26(34):7002–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu J, Huang Y, Kumar A, Tan A, Jin S, Mozhi A, et al. pH-sensitive nano-systems for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(4):693–710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Radu ER, Semenescu A, Voicu SI. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive doxorubicin delivery systems for liver cancer therapy. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(23):5249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang N, Xiao W, Song X, Wang W, Dong X. Recent advances in tumor microenvironment hydrogen peroxide-responsive materials for cancer photodynamic therapy. Nanomicro Lett. 2020;12(1):15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Khramtsov VV, Gillies RJ. Janus-faced tumor microenvironment and redox. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21(5):723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Corso CR, Acco A. Glutathione system in animal model of solid tumors: from regulation to therapeutic target. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;128:43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Y, Shang W, Zhong H, Luo T, Niu M, Xu K, et al. Tumor vessel targeted self-assemble nanoparticles for amplification and prediction of the embolization effect in hepatocellular carcinoma. ACS Nano. 2020;14(11):14907–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu Y, Cheng Y, Tong J, Zhang L, Wei Y, Tian M. Recent advances in thermo-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(13):2979–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Soppimath KS, Aminabhavi TM, Dave AM, Kumbar SG, Rudzinski WE. Stimulus-responsive “smart” hydrogels as novel drug delivery systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28(8):957–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Alexander A, Khan J, Saraf S, Saraf S. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm) based thermosensitive injectable hydrogels for biomedical applications. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;88(3):575–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang L, Shen M, Li R, Zhang X, Sun Y, Gao P, et al. Thermo-sensitive composite hydrogels based on poloxamer 407 and alginate and their therapeutic effect in embolization in rabbit VX2 liver tumors. Oncotarget. 2016;7(45):73280–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei W, Qi X, Liu Y, Li J, Hu X, Zuo G, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a novel pH-thermo dual responsive hydrogel based on salecan and poly(N, N-diethylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid). Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;136:1182–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Nguyen PAH, Stapleton L, Ledesma-Mendoza A, Cuylear DL, Cooperstein MA, Canavan HE. Exploring the anomalous cytotoxicity of commercially-available poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) substrates. Biointerphases. 2018;13(6):06d406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Drozdov AD. Equilibrium swelling of biocompatible thermo-responsive copolymer gels. Gels. 2021;7(2):40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ibrahim-Hashim A, Estrella V. Acidosis and cancer: from mechanism to neutralization. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2019;38(1–2):149–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lym JS, Nguyen QV, da Ahn W, Huynh CT, Jae HJ, Kim YI, et al. Sulfamethazine-based pH-sensitive hydrogels with potential application for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy. Acta Biomater. 2016;41:253–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Park W, Chen J, Cho S, Park SJ, Larson AC, Na K, et al. Acidic pH-triggered drug-eluting nanocomposites for magnetic resonance imaging-monitored intra-arterial drug delivery to hepatocellular carcinoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(20):12711–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sergio A, Cristofori C, Cardin R, Pivetta G, Ragazzi R, Baldan A, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): the role of angiogenesis and invasiveness. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(4):914–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Izzo F, Granata V, Grassi R, Fusco R, Palaia R, Delrio P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation in liver tumors: an update. Oncologist. 2019;24(10):e990–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68(2):723–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shiina S, Sato K, Tateishi R, Shimizu M, Ohama H, Hatanaka T, et al. Percutaneous ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of various ablation techniques and surgery. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;2018:4756147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Izadifar Z, Izadifar Z, Chapman D, Babyn P. An introduction to high intensity focused ultrasound: systematic review on principles, devices, and clinical applications. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. You Y, Wang Z, Ran H, Zheng Y, Wang D, Xu J, et al. Nanoparticle-enhanced synergistic HIFU ablation and transarterial chemoembolization for efficient cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2016;8(7):4324–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen M, Li J, Shu G, Shen L, Qiao E, Zhang N, et al. Homogenous multifunctional microspheres induce ferroptosis to promote the anti-hepatocarcinoma effect of chemoembolization. J Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20(1):179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. van der Zee J. Heating the patient: a promising approach? Ann Oncol. 2002;13(8):1173–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Oei AL, Kok HP, Oei SB, Horsman MR, Stalpers LJA, Franken NAP, et al. Molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;163–164:84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liang YJ, Yu H, Feng G, Zhuang L, Xi W, Ma M, et al. High-performance poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-magnetic microspheres prepared by rotating membrane emulsification for transcatheter arterial embolization and magnetic ablation in VX(2) liver tumors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(50):43478–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao P, Zhao J, Deng Y, Zeng G, Jiang Y, Liao L, et al. Application of iron/barium ferrite/carbon-coated iron nanocrystal composites in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;601:30–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang Y, Meng HM, Li Z. Near-infrared inorganic nanomaterial-based nanosystems for photothermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2021;13(19):8751–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Li X, Yuan HJ, Tian XM, Tang J, Liu LF, Liu FY. Biocompatible copper sulfide-based nanocomposites for artery interventional chemo-photothermal therapy of orthotropic hepatocellular carcinoma. Mater Today Bio. 2021;12: 100128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Huang D, Dai H, Tang K, Chen B, Zhu H, Chen D, et al. A versatile UCST-type composite microsphere for image-guided chemoembolization and photothermal therapy against liver cancer. Nanoscale. 2020;12(38):20002–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Guarino-Hotz M, Zhang JZ. Structural control and biomedical applications of plasmonic hollow gold nanospheres: a mini review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2021;13(4): e1694.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Li J, Zhou M, Liu F, Xiong C, Wang W, Cao Q, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: intra-arterial delivery of doxorubicin-loaded hollow gold nanospheres for photothermal ablation-chemoembolization therapy in rats. Radiology. 2016;281(2):427–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gupta S, Stafford RJ, Javadi S, Ozkan E, Ensor JE, Wright KC, et al. Effects of near-infrared laser irradiation of biodegradable microspheres containing hollow gold nanospheres and paclitaxel administered intraarterially in a rabbit liver tumor model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(4):553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tan L, Wang S, Xu K, Liu T, Liang P, Niu M, et al. Layered MoS2 hollow spheres for highly-efficient photothermal therapy of rabbit liver orthotopic transplantation tumors. Small. 2016;12(15):2046–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Nijsen JF, van het Schip AD, Hennink WE, Rook DW, van Rijk PP, de Klerk JM. Advances in nuclear oncology: microspheres for internal radionuclide therapy of liver tumours. Curr Med Chem. 2002;9(1):73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kallini JR, Gabr A, Thorlund K, Balijepalli C, Ayres D, Kanters S, et al. Comparison of the adverse event profile of therasphere(®) with SIR-spheres(®) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(7):1033–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Qian Y, Liu Q, Li P, Han Y, Zhang J, Xu J, et al. Highly tumor-specific and long-acting iodine-131 microbeads for enhanced treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with low-dose radio-chemoembolization. ACS Nano. 2021;15(2):2933–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ni HC, Yu CY, Chen SJ, Chen LC, Lin CH, Lee WC, et al. Preparation and imaging of rhenium-188 labeled human serum albumin microsphere in orthotopic hepatoma rats. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;99:117–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Vanpouille-Box C, Lacoeuille F, Roux J, Aubé C, Garcion E, Lepareur N, et al. Lipid nanocapsules loaded with rhenium-188 reduce tumor progression in a rat hepatocellular carcinoma model. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3): e16926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Weber M, Lam M, Chiesa C, Konijnenberg M, Cremonesi M, Flamen P, et al. EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(5):1682–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim SP, Cohalan C, Kopek N, Enger SA. A guide to (90)Y radioembolization and its dosimetry. Phys Med. 2019;68:132–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hickey RM, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Nucl Med. 2016;46(2):105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. d’Abadie P, Hesse M, Louppe A, Lhommel R, Walrand S, Jamar F. Microspheres used in liver radioembolization: from conception to clinical effects. Molecules. 2021;26(13):3966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Howerton L. Yttrium 90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Technol. 2021;93(2):197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Reinders MTM, Smits MLJ, van Roekel C, Braat A. Holmium-166 microsphere radioembolization of hepatic malignancies. Semin Nucl Med. 2019;49(3):237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Prince JF, van den Bosch M, Nijsen JFW, Smits MLJ, van den Hoven AF, Nikolakopoulos S, et al. Efficacy of radioembolization with (166)Ho-microspheres in salvage patients with liver metastases: a phase 2 study. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(4):582–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Smits ML, Nijsen JF, van den Bosch MA, Lam MG, Vente MA, Mali WP, et al. Holmium-166 radioembolisation in patients with unresectable, chemorefractory liver metastases (HEPAR trial): a phase 1, dose-escalation study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(10):1025–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Braat A, Bruijnen RCG, van Rooij R, Braat M, Wessels FJ, van Leeuwaarde RS, et al. Additional holmium-166 radioembolisation after lutetium-177-dotatate in patients with neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases (HEPAR PLuS): a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(4):561–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. van den Hoven AF, Prince JF, Bruijnen RC, Verkooijen HM, Krijger GC, Lam MG, et al. Surefire infusion system versus standard microcatheter use during holmium-166 radioembolization: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Li R, Li D, Jia G, Li X, Sun G, Zuo C. Diagnostic performance of theranostic radionuclides used in transarterial radioembolization for liver cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10: 551622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Jouneau S, Vauléon E, Caulet-Maugendre S, Polard E, Volatron AC, Meunier C, et al. 131I-labeled lipiodol-induced interstitial pneumonia: a series of 15 cases. Chest. 2011;139(6):1463–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. De La Vega JC, Esquinas PL, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C, Bokharaei M, Moskalev I, Liu D, et al. Radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with built-in dosimetry: first in vivo results with uniformly-sized, biodegradable microspheres labeled with (188)Re. Theranostics. 2019;9(3):868–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pillai MR, Dash A, Knapp FF Jr. Rhenium-188: availability from the (188)W/(188)Re generator and status of current applications. Curr Radiopharm. 2012;5(3):228–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ballot S, Noiret N, Hindré F, Denizot B, Garin E, Rajerison H, et al. 99mTc/188Re-labelled lipid nanocapsules as promising radiotracers for imaging and therapy: formulation and biodistribution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(5):602–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Wu M, Shi K, Huang R, Liu C, Yin L, Yong W, et al. Facile preparation of 177Lu-microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma radioisotope therapy. Chin Chem Lett. 2022;33(7):3492–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Delaunay K, Edeline J, Rolland Y, Lepareur N, Laffont S, Palard X, et al. Preliminary results of the phase 1 Lip-Re I clinical trial: biodistribution and dosimetry assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with 188Re-SSS Lipiodol radioembolization. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(7):1506–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Llovet JM, Montal R, Sia D, Finn RS. Molecular therapies and precision medicine for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(10):599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Gordan JD, Kennedy EB, Abou-Alfa GK, Beg MS, Brower ST, Gade TP, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(36):4317–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Rimassa L, Danesi R, Pressiani T, Merle P. Management of adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: improving outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;77:20–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Jia ZZ, Jiang GM, Feng YL. Serum HIF-1alpha and VEGF levels pre- and post-TACE in patients with primary liver cancer. Chin Med Sci J. 2011;26(3):158–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Adnane L, Trail PA, Taylor I, Wilhelm SM. Sorafenib (BAY 43–9006, Nexavar), a dual-action inhibitor that targets RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in tumor cells and tyrosine kinases VEGFR/PDGFR in tumor vasculature. Methods Enzymol. 2006;407:597–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Park W, Cho S, Ji J, Lewandowski RJ, Larson AC, Kim DH. Development and validation of sorafenib-eluting microspheres to enhance therapeutic efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021;3(1): e200006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Duran R, Namur J, Pascale F, Czuczman P, Bascal Z, Kilpatrick H, et al. Vandetanib-eluting radiopaque beads: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy in a rabbit model of liver cancer. Radiology. 2019;293(3):695–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Fuchs K, Bize PE, Dormond O, Denys A, Doelker E, Borchard G, et al. Drug-eluting beads loaded with antiangiogenic agents for chemoembolization: in vitro sunitinib loading and release and in vivo pharmacokinetics in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(3):379-87.e1-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhang A, Xiao Z, Liu Q, Li P, Xu F, Liu J, et al. CaCO(3) -encapuslated microspheres for enhanced transhepatic arterial embolization treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(19): e2100748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Choi JW, Lee SY, Cho EJ, Jeong DI, Kim DD, Kim HC, et al. Gas generating microspheres for immediate release of Hsp90 inhibitor aiming at postembolization hypoxia in transarterial chemoembolization therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Pharm. 2021;607: 120988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Chen M, Xu X, Shu G, Lu C, Wu J, Lv X, et al. Multifunctional microspheres dual-loaded with doxorubicin and sodium bicarbonate nanoparticles to introduce synergistic trimodal interventional therapy. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021;4(4):3476–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Bao MH, Wong CC. Hypoxia, metabolic reprogramming, and drug resistance in liver cancer. Cells. 2021;10(7):1715.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Liu Q, Sun JD, Wang J, Ahluwalia D, Baker AF, Cranmer LD, et al. TH-302, a hypoxia-activated prodrug with broad in vivo preclinical combination therapy efficacy: optimization of dosing regimens and schedules. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69(6):1487–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Ma P, Chen J, Qu H, Li Y, Li X, Tang X, et al. Hypoxic targeting and activating TH-302 loaded transcatheter arterial embolization microsphere. Drug Deliv. 2020;27(1):1412–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Shi Y, van der Meel R, Chen X, Lammers T. The EPR effect and beyond: strategies to improve tumor targeting and cancer nanomedicine treatment efficacy. Theranostics. 2020;10(17):7921–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Chen J, White SB, Harris KR, Li W, Yap JW, Kim DH, et al. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres for MRI-monitored delivery of sorafenib in a rabbit VX2 model. Biomaterials. 2015;61:299–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Kim DH, Chen J, Omary RA, Larson AC. MRI visible drug eluting magnetic microspheres for transcatheter intra-arterial delivery to liver tumors. Theranostics. 2015;5(5):477–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Wang YX, Zhu XM, Liang Q, Cheng CH, Wang W, Leung KC. In vivo chemoembolization and magnetic resonance imaging of liver tumors by using iron oxide nanoshell/doxorubicin/poly(vinyl alcohol) hybrid composites. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53(19):4812–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. van Elk M, Ozbakir B, Barten-Rijbroek AD, Storm G, Nijsen F, Hennink WE, et al. Alginate microspheres containing temperature sensitive liposomes (TSL) for MR-guided embolization and triggered release of doxorubicin. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11): e0141626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Wang Q, Xiao A, Liu Y, Zou Q, Zhou Q, Wang H, et al. One-step preparation of nano-in-micro poly(vinyl alcohol) embolic microspheres and used for dual-modal T(1)/T(2)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Nanomedicine. 2018;14(8):2551–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Yu MK, Jeong YY, Park J, Park S, Kim JW, Min JJ, et al. Drug-loaded superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for combined cancer imaging and therapy in vivo. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47(29):5362–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Choi JW, Park JH, Cho HR, Chung JW, Kim DD, Kim HC, et al. Sorafenib and 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid-loaded imageable microspheres for transarterial embolization of a liver tumor. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Bonitatibus PJ Jr, Torres AS, Goddard GD, FitzGerald PF, Kulkarni AM. Synthesis, characterization, and computed tomography imaging of a tantalum oxide nanoparticle imaging agent. Chem Commun (Camb). 2010;46(47):8956–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Zeng J, Li L, Zhang H, Li J, Liu L, Zhou G, et al. Radiopaque and uniform alginate microspheres loaded with tantalum nanoparticles for real-time imaging during transcatheter arterial embolization. Theranostics. 2018;8(17):4591–600.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Tang S, Fu C, Tan L, Liu T, Mao J, Ren X, et al. Imaging-guided synergetic therapy of orthotopic transplantation tumor by superselectively arterial administration of microwave-induced microcapsules. Biomaterials. 2017;133:144–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Wei C, Wu C, Jin X, Yin P, Yu X, Wang C, et al. CT/MR detectable magnetic microspheres for self-regulating temperature hyperthermia and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Acta Biomater. 2022;153:453–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Wang D, Wu Q, Guo R, Lu C, Niu M, Rao W. Magnetic liquid metal loaded nano-in-micro spheres as fully flexible theranostic agents for SMART embolization. Nanoscale. 2021;13(19):8817–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Klaassen NJM, Arntz MJ, Gil Arranja A, Roosen J, Nijsen JFW. The various therapeutic applications of the medical isotope holmium-166: a narrative review. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2019;4(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171970, 81871385), the Beijing Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (JQ21025), the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Z221100007422027), the Peking University Medicine Fund of Fostering Young Scholars’ Scientific & Technological Innovation (BMU2022PY006), the University of Wisconsin–Madison, and the National Institutes of Health (P30 CA014520).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China

    Sitong Wu, Qi Yang, Zhao Chen & Lei Kang

  2. Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China

    Sitong Wu & Yinghua Zou

  3. Departments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53705, USA

    Kevin Fan & Weibo Cai

  4. College of Life Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China

    Yi Hou

Authors
  1. Sitong Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yinghua Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Weibo Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lei Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SW and LK selected the topic and designed the review structure. SW and LK wrote the manuscript. KF, WC, YH, LK, YHZ, QY, and ZC revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi Hou, Yinghua Zou, Weibo Cai or Lei Kang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publication.

Competing interests

Weibo Cai is a scientific advisor, stockholder, and grantee of Focus-X Therapeutics, Inc.; a consultant and grantee of Actithera, Inc.; a consultant of Rad Source Technologies, Inc.; a scientific advisor of Portrai, Inc.; and a scientific advisor and stockholder rTR Technovation Corporation. All other authors declare no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, S., Fan, K., Yang, Q. et al. Smart nanoparticles and microbeads for interventional embolization therapy of liver cancer: state of the art. J Nanobiotechnol 21, 42 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-01804-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-01804-7

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us