Skip to main content

Enhancing intraneural revascularization following peripheral nerve injury through hypoxic Schwann-cell-derived exosomes: an insight into endothelial glycolysis

Abstract

Background

Endothelial cell (EC)-driven intraneural revascularization (INRV) and Schwann cells-derived exosomes (SCs-Exos) both play crucial roles in peripheral nerve injury (PNI). However, the interplay between them remains unclear. We aimed to elucidate the effects and underlying mechanisms of SCs-Exos on INRV following PNI.

Results

We found that GW4869 inhibited INRV, as well as that normoxic SCs-Exos (N-SCs-Exos) exhibited significant pro-INRV effects in vivo and in vitro that were potentiated by hypoxic SCs-Exos (H-SCs-Exos). Upregulation of glycolysis emerged as a pivotal factor for INRV after PNI, as evidenced by the observation that 3PO administration, a glycolytic inhibitor, inhibited the INRV process in vivo and in vitro. H-SCs-Exos more significantly enhanced extracellular acidification rate/oxygen consumption rate ratio, lactate production, and glycolytic gene expression while simultaneously suppressing acetyl-CoA production and pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha (PDH-E1α) expression than N-SCs-Exos both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, we determined that H-SCs-Exos were more enriched with miR-21-5p than N-SCs-Exos. Knockdown of miR-21-5p significantly attenuated the pro-glycolysis and pro-INRV effects of H-SCs-Exos. Mechanistically, miR-21-5p orchestrated EC metabolism in favor of glycolysis by targeting von Hippel-Lindau/hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and PDH-E1α, thereby enhancing hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-mediated glycolysis and inhibiting PDH-E1α-mediated oxidative phosphorylation.

Conclusion

This study unveiled a novel intrinsic mechanism of pro-INRV after PNI, providing a promising therapeutic target for post-injury peripheral nerve regeneration and repair.

Graphical Abstract

Background

The peripheral nervous system (PNS), a multifaceted entity encompassing axons, myelin sheaths, and intraneural vessels coursing within nerves, is a renewable tissue in adult mammals following injury [1]. Despite the superior regenerative potential of the PNS when juxtaposed with the non-regenerative central nervous system (CNS), peripheral nerve injury (PNI) often leads to unsatisfactory structural and functional recovery owing to the sluggish pace and efficiency of regeneration, frequently resulting in partial or complete loss of sensory, motor, and autonomic functions [2, 3].

The vascular network constitutes an indispensable component of the PNS, playing a pivotal role in maintaining the dynamic equilibrium of the nervous system microenvironment and facilitating neural structural repair, development, and functional restoration [4,5,6,7,8,9,10].

Following PNI, the regeneration of intraneural vessels often precedes the regeneration of axons and myelin sheaths. The initial formation of polarized vessels not only serves as a navigational scaffold for Schwann cell (SC) bundles and axons but also as a source of energy and nutrition. This scaffold aids in directing SC bundle and axon migration and regeneration from the proximal to the distal end of the severed sciatic nerve [10,11,12]. Notably, the accurate emulation of the natural vascular system remains a formidable challenge, and the underlying intrinsic mechanisms that trigger native intraneural vessel reconstruction after PNI remain enigmatic.

Endothelial cells (ECs) lining the luminal surface of blood vessels typically maintain a quiescent state in mature blood vessels to preserve vascular homeostasis. However, they transform into an active pro-angiogenic state in response to injury. The physiological function of ECs is intimately tied to their specific metabolic pattern, with 80% of their energy supplied via glycolytic metabolism [13,14,15]. Alterations in the expression of key glycolytic enzymes, such as PFKFB3 or GLUT1, significantly impact the angiogenic capacity of ECs [16,17,18,19]. Despite this knowledge, our understanding of whether and how changes in the glycolytic metabolism of vascular ECs affect polarized vessel formation in the PNS remains limited.

As the glial cells of the PNS, SCs wield substantial influence over post-injury regenerative processes by facilitating axonal regrowth, elongation, and remyelination through diverse pathways [20]. A recent single-cell sequencing study hinted at the existence of a close interaction between SCs and ECs in the PNS. However, the precise roles and underlying mechanisms of this interaction remain obscure [21]. Exosomes, small bi-lipid membrane vesicles measuring 50 to 200 nm in diameter and containing DNA, mRNA, miRNA, proteins, and other cellular components, play a pivotal role in mediating intercellular communication, including tissue angiogenesis [22, 23]. Intriguingly, exosomes are also implicated in the regulation of intercellular energy metabolism [24, 25]. Thus, we postulated that exosomes derived from SCs (SCs-Exos) may be associated with EC-mediated post-injury intraneural revascularization by modulating energy metabolism.

In this study, we present evidence that SCs-Exos enhances the glycolytic metabolism of ECs, thereby facilitating intraneural revascularization, axon regeneration, and functional recovery following PNI. Furthermore, we elucidate how the upregulation of miR-21-5p in SCs-Exos following hypoxic preconditioning strengthens this metabolic reprogramming by targeting the von Hippel-Lindau/hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (VHL/HIF-1α) and the pyruvate dehydrogenase-E1α subunit (PDH-E1α) pathways simultaneously.

Results

Exosomal shuttle-mediated intraneural revascularization after PNI

According to previous studies, the angiogenic process typically occurs between the first and fifth day following PNI [12], In our investigation, we collected nerve segments on the fifth day post-injury for further analysis. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) results revealed that the administration of GW4869, an inhibitor of exosome release, led to a significant reduction in CD31 + blood vessels within the sciatic nerve, indicating a substantial inhibition of intraneural revascularization (Fig. 1A and B). This observation aligns with previous research emphasizing the role of exosomes in regulating nerve regeneration and repair [26, 27]. Notably, GW4869 administration also hindered axonal (anti-NF-200) and myelin (anti-MBP) regeneration (Fig. 1C and E). Furthermore, our assessment of paw print patterns and the sciatic nerve function index (SFI) demonstrated delayed recovery in both sensory and motor functions (Fig. 1F and G). These findings collectively suggest a close relationship between exosomal transport within the injured sciatic nerve and intraneural revascularization, post-injury axon regeneration, and functional recovery following PNI.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Exosomal shuttle is involved in post-injury intra-neuro-revascularization and nerve repair after sciatic nerve injury. (A). Representative immunohistochemical staining of CD31 (brown) and nuclei (blue) was conducted to visualize intraneural blood vessels in the sciatic nerve segments from both the sham group (exposed sciatic nerve without injury) and the crush group (with crush injury), with or without administration of GW4869 (scale bar = 100 μm, n = 5 rats/group). (B). The quantifications of the numbers of intraneural blood vessels shown in (A). (C). Representative immunofluorescent staining of neurofilaments (NF-200, green), myeline (MBP, red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) to evaluate post-injury nerve regeneration (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group). (D-E). The quantifications of the NF-200 and MBP positive area shown in (C). (F). Representative footprints of rats with or without GW4869 administration after 8 weeks of sciatic nerve crush injury. The left image shows the control group and the right image the sham or operative group. (G). Sciatic functional index (SFI) analysis to evaluate functional recovery from weeks 1 to 8 after sciatic nerve injury (n = 5 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. A Student’s t test was used for comparisons. NF-200: Neurofilament-200; MBP: Myelin basic protein

SCs-Exos facilitated intraneural revascularization and hypoxic precondition enhanced this process

To explore whether SCs-Exos affected angiogenesis in vitro, we collected the culture supernatants from SCs subjected to normoxic or hypoxic conditions (N-SCs supernatants or H-SCs supernatants) for co-culturing with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Our results showed that N-SCs-supernatants facilitated HUVEC tube formation (Fig. S1A and S1D), invasion (Fig. S1B and S1E), and proliferation (Fig. S1C and S1F). Interestingly, H-SCs supernatants appeared to have a stronger pro-angiogenic role than N-SCs supernatants (Fig. S1A–S1F). To confirm the involvement of exosomes in pro-revascularization in vivo, we employed GW4869 to inhibit exosome secretion. Our results revealed that the pro-vascular effects of both N-SCs supernatants and H-SCs supernatants were effectively counteracted by GW4869 treatment (Fig. S1A–S1F). Subsequently, we established a co-culture system to further investigate the impact on dorsal root ganglion neurons (DRGns; Fig. S2A). Furthermore, our findings demonstrated that ECs treated with H-SCs supernatants exhibited greater promotion of axonal growth compared to those treated with N-SCs supernatants. However, GW4869 administration mitigated the effects of both types of supernatants (Fig. S2B and S2C). These results suggest that SCs-Exos mediate the pro-angiogenic role of SCs in ECs, further enhancing neural axonal growth in vitro. Notably, hypoxic preconditioning amplifies this positive effect.

We next employed ultracentrifugation to isolate exosomes from the supernatants of SC cultures, adhering to established protocols detailed in prior publications [28, 29]. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis revealed that both N-SCs-Exos and H-SC-Exos exhibited characteristic bilayered, spherical membrane vesicles (Fig. 2A). The size of N-SCs-Exos and H-SCs-Exos spanned from 30 to 212 nm (average 101.25 nm) and 40 to 225 nm (average 109.25 nm), respectively, and had a concentration of 8.56 × 109 and 9.32 × 109 particles/ml, respectively (Fig. 2B). Western blot analysis confirmed the positive expression of exosomal-specific markers, including CD9, CD63, and TSG101. Notably, the cytoplasmic protein calnexin was not detected in exosomes (Fig. 2C). These data suggest that the exosomes from SCs were successfully purified.

Fig. 2
figure 2

H-SCs-Exos promotes intraneural angiogenesis and nerve repair after sciatic nerve injury. (A). Representative TEM for N-/H-SCs-Exos (scale bar = 100 μm). (B). NTA for concentration and size of N-/H-SCs-Exos. (C). Western blot assay for detecting exosomal-specific markers TSG101, CD9, and CD63 and cytoplasm marker calnexin. (D–F). Representative tube formation, transwell invasion, and EdU assay for evaluating endothelial angiogenic capacity after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment (scale bar = 200–50 μm). (G). Data analysis for D to F (n = 5 rats/group). (H). PKH-67-labeled N-H-SCs-Exos (green) track in intraneural endothelial cells (ECs; CD31+, red) of injured sciatic nerve sites (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group). (I). CD31 + PKH-67+/CD31 + ratio. (J). CD31 + ECs per field analysis. (K). Representative immunofluorescent staining of neurofilaments (NF-200, green), myeline (MBP, red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) to evaluate post-injury nerve regeneration (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group) and data analysis shown in L to N. Representative footprints of rats with saline or N-/H-SCs-Exos administration at 8 weeks after sciatic nerve crush injury. The left image shows the control group and the right image the sham or operative group. (O). Sciatic functional index calculation to evaluate functional recovery from week 1 to 8 after sciatic nerve injury (n = 5 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. A Student’s t test was used for comparisons. NF-200: Neurofilament-200; MBP: Myelin basic protein; TEM: Transmission electron microscope; NTA: Nanosight tracking analysis; SFI: Sciatic functional index

For the in vitro investigation, we co-cultured the two purified exosomes with HUVECs. The results showed that the H-SCs-Exos significantly promoted HUVEC tube formation (Fig. 2D and G), invasion (Fig. 2E and G), and proliferation (Fig. 2F and G). Further, a co-culture system of ECs and DRGns was established (Fig. S2D), and H-SCs-Exos-treated ECs more strongly promoted DRGns axonal growth (Fig. S2E). To determine the precise effects of N-SCs-Exos and H-SCs-Exos on intraneural endothelial cells in vivo, PKH-67-labeled N-SCs-Exos, and H-SCs-Exos were locally injected into the sciatic nerve injury site. The co-localized expression of PKH-67 + CD31 + was detected to evaluate the internalized capacity of vascular endothelial cells in the sciatic nerve injury site to two types of exosomes. The observed internalization of exosomes revealed that the intraneural ECs had great internal ability to both N-SCs-Exos and H-SCs-Exos and that the intensity of H-SCs-Exos is slightly higher than that of N-SCs-Exos (Fig. 2H and I). Consistent with the in vitro results, H-SCs-Exos facilitated intraneural revascularization (CD31 + blood vessels) more strongly than N-SCs-Exos (Fig. 2H and J).

We then aimed to further ascertain the post-injury structural construction of sciatic nerves. IF for detection of NF-200 + neurofilament and MBP + myelin showed that both N-SCs-Exos and H-SCs-Exos strongly enhanced the fluorescent intensity and that H-SCs-Exos did so more strongly (Fig. 2K and M). In the detection of SFI, we found that both N-SCs-Exos and N-SCs-Exos significantly improved sciatic nerve function and that H-SCs-Exos did so more strongly (Fig. 2N and O). These data suggest that the localized hypoxic precondition enhances the promotion of SCs-Exos in intraneural revascularization, axon regeneration, and functional recovery.

SCs-Exos reprogram endothelial energy metabolism to facilitate intraneural revascularization

The endothelial glycolysis level is intimately associated with post-injury revascularization. To determine the role of endothelial metabolic changes in post-injury intraneural revascularization, we detected the metabolites at the injury site of the sciatic nerve. The results showed noticeably increased lactate (Fig. S2A) and pyruvate (Fig. S2B) production and decreased acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) production (Fig. S2C) after spinal cord injury (SCI), whereas GW4869 administration counteracted this metabolic reprogramming (Fig. S2A–3 C). The IHC results showed lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) conversion of pyruvate to lactate in both the entire nerve section and intraneural blood vessels had increased (Fig. S3D–3 F), whereas pyruvate dehydrogenase-E1-alpha subunit (PDH-E1α) conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA had decreased (Fig. S3G–I).

Fig. 3
figure 3

H-SCs-Exos boosts glycolysis but inhibits oxidative phosphorylation in vitro and in vivo. (A). Capability of HUVECs to endocytose DiR-labeled N-/H-SCs-Exos (red, DiR; blue, DAPI; scale bar = 40 μm, n = 6 rats/group. (B). Fluorescent intensity analysis of A. C. HUVEC OCR assay for evaluating cellular mitochondrial respiration. (D). HUVECs’ ECAR assay for evaluating cellular glycolytic level. (E). ECAR/OCR ratio calculation for further analysis. (F). Pyruvate production, (G). lactate production, and (H). acetyl-coA production of HUVECs after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment (n = 4 rats/group). (I). GLUT1, HK2, PFKFB3, LDHA, and PDH-E1α protein expression in HUVECs after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment. β-actin was used as the reference protein (n = 5 rats/group). (J). GLUT1, HK2, PFKFB3, LDHA, and PDH-E1α protein expression in injured sciatic nerve segments after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment. β-actin was used as the reference protein (n = 5 rats/group). (K). Pyruvate production, (L). lactate production, and (M). acetyl-coA production of HUVECs after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment (n = 8 rats/group). (NP). Representative immunofluorescent staining of intraneural ECs (CD31+, green), LDHA (red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) to evaluate glycolysis changes of entire injured sciatic nerve site and intraneural ECs after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group). (QS). Representative immunofluorescent staining of intraneural ECs (CD31+, green), PDH-E1α (red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) to evaluate changes in pyruvate production and mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) metabolism at entire injured sciatic nerve site and intraneural ECs after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. A Student’s t test was used for comparisons. HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; GLUT1: Glucose transport 1; PFKFB3: 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3; HK2: Hexokinase 2; LDHA: Lactate dehydrogenase A; PDH-E1α: Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha 1; ECAR: Extracellular acidification rate; OCR: Oxygen consumption rate

Consistently, the GW4869 administration reversed the aforementioned processes (Fig. S3G–I). The results suggest that crush injury shifts the metabolic phenotype of local sciatic nerves in favor of glycolysis. To further determine the effects of this metabolic shift on post-injured nerve repair, 3PO, a specific inhibitor of the glycolytic pathway, was administered. The results revealed that glycolysis inhibition by 3PO significantly hampered the nerve fiber (anti-NF200) and myelin reconstruction (anti-MBP; Fig. S4A–C). The SFI results showed that 3PO delayed the automatic repair process of sciatic nerve function (Fig. S3D and S3E). Collectively, our data indicate that exosomal shuttling is involved in injury-triggered metabolic reprogramming of endothelial cells in favor of glycolysis to facilitate intraneural revascularization and further functional recovery.

SCs-Exos promotion of endothelial angiogenesis via regulation of metabolic reprogramming was next explored. First, both DiR-labeled N- and H-SCs-Exos were well internalized by HUVECs without significant differences (Fig. 3A and B). Observation of the slight predominance of internalization of H-SCs-Exos in vivo indicates that the main reason for the lack of differences was the sufficient concentration of exosomes, which masked the differences in vitro. The extracellular acid rate (ECAR) and oxygen consumption rate (OCR) results showed that H-SCs-Exos more significantly enhanced the ECAR (Fig. 3C) and inhibited the OCR of HUVECs (Fig. 3D), increasing the ECAR/OCR ratio (Fig. 3E), which indicated upregulated glycolytic metabolism and downregulated mitochondrial respiration.

The metabolites pyruvate, lactate, and acetyl-CoA were detected in HUVECs, of which H-SCs-Exos more strongly increased the production of pyruvate (Fig. 3F) and lactate (Fig. 3G) but more strongly decreased the production of acetyl-CoA (Fig. 3H) than N-SCs-Exos. Finally, the western blotting results showed that H-SCs-Exos more strongly upregulated the expression of the glycolytic enzyme protein than N-SCs-Exos, including glucose transporter (GLUT1), hexokinase2 (HK2), 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3 (PFKFB3) and LDHA (Fig. 3I), while downregulated PDH-E1α, which mediates acetyl-coA production (Fig. 3I).

Western blot analysis after N- or H-SCs-Exos were locally administered in vivo showed that H-SCs-Exos administration more significantly increased the overall level of the lactate-produced protein enzymes CLUT1, HK2, PFKFB3, and LDHA at the injury site after SCI than N-SCs-Exos administration (Fig. 3J). In contrast, the PDH-E1α level was more strongly decreased by H-SCs-Exos administration (Fig. 3J). The metabolite assays showed that H-SCs-Exos administration more strongly increased pyruvate (Fig. 3K) and lactate (Fig. 3L) production than N-SCs-Exos administration. In contrast, H-SCs-Exos administration more significantly decreased acetyl-CoA production (Fig. 3M).

The immunofluorescence (IF) results of LDHA + CD31+ /CD31 + ratio and PDH-E1α + CD31 + cells/CD31 + ratio analysis showed that H-SCs-Exos administration more significantly increased the expression of LDHA in both the entire injured nerve (Fig. 3N and O) and intraneural ECs (Fig. 3N and P) than N-SCs-Exos administration but decreased PDH-E1α production (Fig. 3Q and S). Considered together, these results suggest that hypoxic preconditioning enhances the function of SCs-Exos in upregulating glycolysis and downregulating oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) of intraneural vascular endothelial cells to facilitate intraneural revascularization and nerve repair.

Mir-21-5p transfer is responsible for the metabolic regulation of SCs-Exos on endothelial cells

MicroRNAs are enriched in exosomes and perform various biological functions [30]. According to our studies and those of other authors, SCs and their released exosomes are enriched with miR-21-5p [26, 31, 32]. Interestingly, in the present study, H-SCs-Exos were more enriched with miR-21-5p than N-SCs-Exos (Fig. S5A), in agreement with the characteristics of miR-21-5p as a hypoxia-responsive miRNA, as previously reported [33]. Both pri-miR-21-5p and pre-miR-21-5p quantities in the nerve after SCI strongly increased (Fig. S5B and S5C). Further, after local administration with N-SCs-Exos or H-SCs-Exos, the pre-miR-21-5p quantity at the injury site of the sciatic nerve was more strongly increased by H-SCs-Exos than by N-SCs-Exos administration, while neither affected pri-miR-21-5p quantity (Fig. S5D and S5E). Similarly, the pre-miR-21-5p quantity in HUVECs treated with H-SCs-Exos was higher than that of those treated with N-SCs-Exos or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, ) while the pri-miR-21-5p quantity did not change (Fig. S5F and S5G). Our data suggest that miR-21-5p could be transferred rather than stimulated by both N-SCs-Exos and H-SCs-Exos to ECs and that H-SCs-Exos are more strongly enriched with miR-21-5p.

To verify whether metabolic regulation of SCs on endothelial cells was through transferring miR-21-5p, H-SCs-Exos were extracted from hypoxia-cultured SCs that had been pretreated with an anti-miR-21-5p oligonucleotide (H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p) or with scrambled control (H-SCs-Exosanti-NC; Fig. 4A). Next, the mitochondrial metabolic program was detected by measuring ECAR and OCR, which showed that H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-upregulated ECAR of HUVECs was counteracted by H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p (Fig. 4B). In contrast, the decreased OCR of HUVECs by H-SCs-Exosanti-NC was partly rescued by H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p (Fig. 4C). The ECAR/OCR ratio of HUVECs notably increased after H-SCs-Exosanti-NC administration, which was counteracted by H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

H-SCs-Exos increase glycolysis of ECs through transferring miR-21-5p in vitro. (A). qRT-PCR assay for expression of miR-21-5p in H-SCs-Exos after treatment with PBS (control), anti-NC, or anti-miR-21-5p (n = 5 rats/group). (B). HUVEC ECAR assay for evaluating cellular glycolytic level (n = 6 rats/group). (C). HUVEC OCR assay for evaluating cellular mitochondrial respiration (n = 6 rats/group). (D). ECAR/OCR ratio calculation for further analysis (n = 6 rats/group). (E). Pyruvate production, (F). lactate production, and (G). acetyl-coA production of HUVECs after N-/H-SCs-Exos treatment (n = 8/group). (H–L). Western blot showing protein expression of HK2, PFKFB3, LDHA, and PDH-E1α in HUVECs after PBS, H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p treatment. β-actin was used as the reference protein (n = 3 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. A Student’s t test was used for comparisons. HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; PFKFB3: 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase 3; HK2: Hexokinase 2; LDHA: Lactate dehydrogenase A; PDH-E1α: Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha 1; ECAR: Extracellular acidification rate; OCR: Oxygen consumption rate

Metabolite assay showed that H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration significantly reversed H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-increased pyruvate (Fig. 4E) and lactate (Fig. 4F) production and decreased acetyl-CoA (Fig. 4G) production. The western blot results showed that H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration strongly reversed H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-upregulated HK2, PFKFB3, and LDHA protein expression, but didn’t recover H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-downregulated PDH-E1α protein expression (Fig. 4H and L).

In vivo, H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration reversed the H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-augmented pyruvate (Fig. 5A) and lactate (Fig. 5B) production and reduced acetyl-CoA (Fig. 5C) production at injury site nerve segments. The IF results for LDHA + CD31 + cells and PDH-E1α + CD31 + cells at the injury site showed that H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration reversed the H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-increased percentage of the LDHA + CD31 + area (Fig. 5D and E) and the overall lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) expression in injured sciatic nerve segments (Fig. 5D and F). H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration also counteracted the H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-decreased percentage of PDH-E1α + CD31 + area (Fig. 5G and H) and the overall PDH-E1α level (Fig. 5G and I). These data suggest that H-SCs-Exos skew endothelial metabolism in favor of glycolysis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

H-SCs-Exos regulate EC energy metabolism programming through transferring miR-21-5p in vivo. (A). Pyruvate production, (B). lactate production, and (C). acetyl-coA production at injured sciatic nerve sites after saline (control), H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p treatment (n = 8 rats/group). (D–F). Representative immunofluorescent staining of intraneural ECs (CD31+, green), LDHA (red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) to evaluate glycolytic metabolism of entire injured sciatic nerve and intraneural ECs (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group). (G-I). Representative immunofluorescent staining of intraneural ECs (CD31+, green), PDH-E1α (red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) to evaluate pyruvate production and mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolism of entire injured sciatic nerve and intraneural ECs (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group). (J). CD31 + vascular endothelial cell (EC) counts in D and G. (K–M). Representative immunofluorescent staining of neurofilaments (NF-200, green), myeline (MBP, red), and nuclei (DAPI, blue) to evaluate post-injury nerve regeneration (scale bar = 50 μm, n = 5 rats/group. (N). Representative footprints of rats with saline, H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p administration after 8 weeks of sciatic nerve crush injury. The left image shows the control group and the right image sham or operative group. (O). Sciatic functional index calculation to evaluate functional recovery from week 1 to 8 after sciatic nerve injury (n = 5 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. A Student’s t test was used for comparisons. NF-200: Neurofilament-200; MBP: Myelin basic protein; TEM: Transmission electron microscope; NTA: Nanosight tracking analysis; ECAR: Extracellular acidification rate; OCR: Oxygen consumption rate; LDHA: Lactate dehydrogenase A; PDH-E1α: Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha

Knockdown of miR-21-5p impeded H-SCs-Exos-initiated intraneural revascularization (Fig. 5G and J) and H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration significantly decreased the promotional effects of H-SCs-Exosanti-NC on axonal regeneration (Fig. 5K and L) and remyelination (Fig. 5K and M). Unsurprisingly, the paw print and SFI results showed that H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p notably impeded H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-enhanced sciatic nerve function (Fig. 5N and O). These data suggest that miR-21-5p transfer is mainly responsible for the significant pro-revascularization and pro-regeneration effects of H-SCs-Exos after PNI.

Mir-21-5p regulates endothelial metabolic programming via targeting VHL/HIF-1α and PDH-E1α

Hypoxia-induced factors alpha (HIF-1α), a transcriptional factor responsible for mediating glycolysis in the hypoxic microenvironment of the injury site [34, 35], was assayed in injury-site sciatic nerve segments and HUVECs at the transcriptional and translational level. The findings revealed that the mRNA and protein expression of HIF-1α significantly increased after SCI and was counteracted by the local injection of GW4869 (Fig. 6A and B). When the sciatic nerve was locally treated with saline (control), H-SCs-Exosanti-NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p after crush injury, the results showed that H-SCs-Exosanti-NC administration enhanced the mRNA and protein expression of HIF-1α compared to the control group and that H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration counteracted the increase of HIF-1α (Fig. 6C and D).

Fig. 6
figure 6

H-SCs-Exos-derived miR-21-5p stabilizes HIF-1α to enhance endothelial glycolysis-mediated intraneural revascularization. (A). qRT-PCR assay for expression of HIF-1α mRNA at injured sciatic nerve sites after inhibiting exosomal shuttle with GW4869 administration (n = 3 rats/group). (B). Western blot assay for HIF-1α protein expression after GW4869 administration (n = 3 rats/group). (C, D). HIF-1α mRNA and protein expression at injured sciatic nerve sites after saline, H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p administration (n = 3 rats/group). (E, F). HIF-1α mRNA and protein expression of HUVECs after PBS, H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p administration (n = 3 rats/group. (G, H). Representative immunohistochemical staining of CD31 (brown) for evaluating intraneural revascularization after miR-21-5p mimic and PX-478 treatment (DAPI, blue; n = 5 rats/group). (I–K). Pyruvate, lactate, and acetyl-CoA production at injured sciatic nerve sites after miR-21-5p mimic and PX-478 administration (n = 8 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. A Student’s t test was for comparisons. LDHA: Lactate dehydrogenase A; PDH-E1α: Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha

A higher HIF-1α expression in HUVECs treated with H-SCs-Exosanti-NC than PBS was also observed in vitro that was counteracted by H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration (Fig. 6E and F). To determine whether miR-21-5p regulated HIF-1α-mediated energy metabolism to facilitate post-injury intra-neuro-revascularization, miR-21-5p mimic or inhibitor was transfected to induce overexpression or knockdown of miR-21-5p, respectively, in vivo and in vitro, which was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR; Fig. S6A and S6B). When PX-478, a HIF-1α inhibitor that can cross the neurovascular barrier, was administered to inactivate HIF-1α activity in the injured sciatic nerve, PX-478 significantly inhibited the CD31 + revascularization of the post-injury sciatic nerve and diminished the pro-intra-neuro-revascularization effects of miR-21-5p (Fig. 6G and H).

Metabolic level measurements showed that PX-478 administration significantly abated pyruvate (Fig. 6I) and lactate (Fig. 6J) production and increased acetyl-coA (Fig. 6K) production. Overexpression of miR-21-5p induced the opposite of these actions. Interestingly, PX-478 partially reversed the effects of miR-21-5p. In vitro, the presence of HUVECs with miR-21-5p and PX-478 increased pyruvate (Fig. S7A) and lactate (Fig. S7B) production but decreased acetyl-coA (Fig. S7C) production of HUVECs. Likewise, miR-21-5p overexpression enhanced the ECAR (Fig. S7D) but not the OCR of HUVECs (Fig. S7E), resulting in increased ECAR/OCR ratio (Fig. S7F), whereas PX-478 partially reversed these effects of miR-21-5p on HUVECs. All these data suggest that miR-21-5p promotes the tendency of EC energy metabolism toward glycolysis through enhanced HIF-1α signaling to facilitate intra-neuro-revascularization after PNI.

To further determine the downstream targets of miR-21-5p, we employed TargetScan, miRanda, and miRTarbase, three independent online bioinformatics databases. miR-21-5p targets contributed to HIF-1α activity prediction focused on VHL, an upstream gene mediating the post-translationally ubiquitinated degradation of HIF-1α. H-SCs-Exosanti-NC administration further aggravated the injury-stimulated downregulation of VHL mRNA and protein, while H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration reversed this downregulation (Fig. 7A and B). In vitro, the protein and mRNA expression of VHL was lower in HUVECs co-incubated with H-SCs-Exosanti-NC, whereas H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p administration partly rescued H-SCs-Exosanti-NC-decreased VHL expression (Fig. 7C and D).

Fig. 7
figure 7

H-SCs-Exos-derived miR-21-5p targets VHL, increasing HIF-1α stabilization to directly or indirectly enhance endothelial glycolysis. (A, B). VHL mRNA and protein expression at injured sciatic nerve sites after saline (control), H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p administration (n = 3 rats/group). (C, D). VHL mRNA expression and protein expression in HUVECs after PBS (control), H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p administration (n = 3 rats/group). (E). Predicted potential binding sites for miR-21-5p on 3’-UTR of PDH-E1α. (F). Dual luciferase activity of HUVECs transfected with VHL-3’UTR luciferase constructs with miR-21-5p mimic or negative control (n = 3 rats/group). (G). Dual luciferase activity of HUVECs transfected with VHL-3’UTR luciferase constructs with saline (control), H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p (n = 3 rats/group). (H–J). Pyruvate, lactate, and acetyl-CoA production of HUVECs transfected with si-NC or si-VHL and with or without PX-478 (n = 6 rats/group). (K). HUVEC ECAR assay for evaluating cellular glycolytic level (n = 6 rats/group). (L). HUVEC OCR assay for evaluating cellular mitochondrial respiration (n = 6 rats/group). (M). ECAR/OCR ratio calculation for further analysis. (N, O). PDK1 mRNA and protein expression of post-injury sciatic nerves with or without GW4869 administration (n = 3 rats/group). (P, Q). PDK1 mRNA expression in vivo and vitro after treatment with saline or PBS (control), H-SCs-Exos, H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p (n = 3 rats/group). (R, S). PDK1 protein expression in vivo and in vitro after treatment with saline or PBS (control), H-SCs-Exos, H-SCs-Exosanti−NC, or H-SCs-Exosanti−miR−21−5p (n = 3 rats/group). (T–V). mRNA and protein expression of PDK1 and PDH-E1α in HUVECs with or without miR-21-5p mimic and si-HIF-1α transfection (n = 3 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. A Student’s t test was used for comparisons. HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; VHL: von Hippel-Lindau; ECAR: Extracellular acidification rate; OCR: Oxygen consumption rate; LDHA: Lactate dehydrogenase A; PDH-E1α: Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha; PDK1: Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1

If miR-21-5p directly binds to the predicted target region of the VHL mRNA, it could be confirmed by dual-luciferase report assays via co-transfecting HUVECs with a plasmid containing wild- or mutant-type VHL 3’UTR and miR-21-5p mimic or mimic NC. The predicted potential binding sites for miR-21-5p would be on the 3’-UTR of PDH-E1α (Fig. 7E). There was lower luciferase activity in the co-transfected wild-type and mimic group as well as no appreciable change in the mutated group (Fig. 7F). Consistently, H-SCs-Exos decreased the luciferase activity of pVHL 3’UTR but not that of mutant pVHL 3’UTR (Fig. 7G). Interestingly, H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21-5p could not inhibit luciferase activity (Fig. 7G).

Knock-down of VHL of HUVECs with si-VHL revealed that HIF-1α expression was strongly upregulated at the transcriptional and translational levels (Fig. S8A and S8B). Metabolite detection revealed that VHL depletion with si-VHL increased pyruvate (Fig. 7H) and lactate (Fig. 7I) production and decreased acetyl-coA (Fig. 7J) production. Unsurprisingly, PX-478 reversed these phenomena (Fig. 7H and J). VHL depletion enhanced the ECAR (Fig. 7K) and inhibited the OCR (Fig. 7L) of HUVECs, increasing the ECAR/OCR ratio, while PX-478 diminished these effects. These data indicate that exosomal miR-21-5p enhances HIF-1α-mediated endothelial glycolysis by targeting VHL.

Previous studies demonstrated that HIF-1α inhibits the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle by activating pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-1 (PDK1) to suppress PDH-E1α [36,37,38,39,40]. In this study, we observed upregulated PDK1 in mRNA and increased protein levels after PNI, which was counteracted by GW4869 administration (Fig. 7N and O). Interestingly, H-SCs-Exosanti-NC administration further enhanced PDK1 upregulation but was counteracted by depletion of miR-21-5p (H-SCs-Exosanti-miR-21−5p) in vivo and vitro (Fig. 7P–S). To determine whether exosomal miR-21-5p-increased HIF-1α accumulation led to PDK1 activation inhibiting endothelial OXPHOS, we established a co-transfected system with miR-21-5p NC/mimic and si-NC/HIF-1α. The expression of miR-21-5p (Fig. S6B) and HIF-1α (Fig. S8C–D) was successfully overexpressed and knocked down, respectively.

Fig. 8
figure 8

miR-21-5p targets PDH-E1α to inhibit mitochondrial respiration-related OXPHOS of HUVECs. (A). Predicted potential binding sites for miR-21-5p on 3’-UTR of PDH-E1α. (B). Dual-luciferase reporter assay confirming PDH-E1α is a target gene of miR-21-5p (n = 3 rats/group). (C). qRT-PCR assay showing PDH-E1α mRNA expression in HUVECs after transfection of miR-21-5p mimic and inhibitor (n = 3 rats/group). (D). Western blot showing PDH-E1α protein expression level after transfection of miR-21-5p mimic and inhibitor (n = 3 rats/group). (E, F). mRNA and protein expression of PDH-E1α in HUVECs after knockdown of PDH-E1α with si-PDHE1α (n = 3 rats/group). (G). ECAR, (H). OCR, and (I). ECAR/OCR ratio of HUVECs after transfection with si-PDHE1α. (JL). Pyruvate, lactate, and acetyl-CoA production of HUVECs after transfection with si-PDHE1α (n = 8 rats/group). (M). Tube-formation capacity assay of HUVECs after transfection with si-PDHE1α (n = 6 rats/group). (N). Transwell assay for invasion capacity of HUVECs after transfection with si-PDHE1α (n = 6 rats/group). (O). CCK-8 assay for proliferation capacity of HUVECs after transfection with si-PDHE1α (n = 6 rats/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Bars represent group means ± SD. Student’s t test was used for comparisons. HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; OXPHOS: Oxidative phosphorylation; ECAR: Extracellular acidification rate; OCR: Oxygen consumption rate; PDH-E1α: Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 alpha; PDK1: Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1; CCK-8: Cell counting kit-8

Surprisingly, further results at the transcriptional translation level revealed a remarkable increase in PDK1 and a decrease in PDH-E1α after miR-21-5p mimic treatment, with the knockdown of HIF-1α with si-HIF-1α counteracting PDK1 increase but not rescuing PDH-E1α expression (Fig. 7T–V), indicating another process may be significantly inhibiting PDH-E1α by miR-21-5p.

In addition, we reviewed the targets of miR-21-5p in the TargetScan and miRanda bioinformatic database and found that PDH-E1α with a conserved binding site for miR-21-5p might be a responsible downstream target (Fig. 8A). If miR-21-5p directly binds to the predicted target region of the PDH-E1α mRNA, it would be confirmed by dual-luciferase report assays showing co-transfection of HUVECs with a plasmid containing wild- or mutant-type PDH-E1α 3’UTR and miR-21-5p mimic (Fig. 8A). There was low luciferase activity in the wild-type group transfected with miR-21-5p mimic and no appreciable change in the mutated group (Fig. 8B). qRT-PCR and western blot assay showed that miR-21-5p mimic inhibited the expression of PDH-E1α, and inhibitor increased that (Fig. 8C and D). Our data suggest that the direct inhibition of PDH-E1α is likely the main manner in which miR-21-5p inhibits endothelial OXPHOS.

Previous studies have elucidated that inhibition of PDH-E1α could variously enhance lactate-production glycolysis [41,42,43]. In the present study, PDH-E1α in HUVECs was effectively knocked down via transfecting siRNA (si-PDH-E1α), as shown in Fig. 8E and F. Downregulation of PDH-E1α enhanced the ECAR (Fig. 8G) and weakened the OCR (Fig. 8H) of HUVECs, increasing the ECAR/OCR ratio (Fig. 8I); simultaneously, metabolite assays showed an increase in pyruvate (Fig. 8J) and lactate (Fig. 8K) production but a decrease in acetyl-CoA (Fig. 8L) production. Pro-angiogenic potentiality assay showed that knockdown of PDH-E1α promoted tube-formation capacity (Fig. 8M), invasion capacity (Fig. 8N), and proliferation (Fig. 8O). These data suggest that exosomal miR-21-5p-mediated PDH-E1α inhibition weakens OXPHOS and variously strengthens the glycolysis of intraneural endothelial cells, promoting intraneural revascularization synchronously after PNI.

In summary, our findings indicate that H-SC-Exo-augmented miR-21-5p transition facilitates intraneural endothelium-initiated revascularization by targeting VHL to enhance HIF-1α-accumulation-mediated glycolysis and targeting PDH-E1α to weaken mitochondrial OXPHOS.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that SCs-Exos enhance glycolytic metabolism and synchronously repress endothelial OXPHOS, facilitating intraneural revascularization, axonal regeneration, and functional recovery after PNI. Transferred miR-21-5p was primarily responsible for this metabolic shift via targeting VHL to enhance HIF-1α stabilization-mediated endothelial glycolysis and undermine PDH-E1α-mediated OXPHOS. Under hypoxic conditions, the miR-21-5p quantity significantly increased, which further augmented the metabolic shift in favor of glycolysis. Concurrently, the two pathways reciprocally affected each other and conjointly enhanced endothelial glycolysis. Together, these data reveal a novel and comprehensive metabolic means of facilitating axon regeneration and functional recovery from PNI.

It is well-accepted that INVS development and reconstruction are strongly connected with neurogenesis and nerve regeneration in PNS. Both the promotion of INRV and the induction of adequate vascularization of artificial nerve grafts significantly enhance pro-neural regenerative effects [10, 44,45,46,47]. However, little is known about the specific role and underlying mechanisms of INV in PNI. Vascularization in PNS is divided into two longitudinal systems: the extra-neural vascular system (ENVS), located peri-fascicularly for connection to external vascular systems by branches, and the INVS, located intra-fascicularly for direct contact with neural cells. In this study, we mainly focused on the reconstruction of INVS after PNI. The complex INVS needed at least 7 days for reconstruction and 14 days for sufficient pre-vascularization in vitro but only 3 to 5 days for sufficient polarized blood vessel formation in vivo [9, 10, 12, 45]. The activated regenerative program of neural cells and non-neural cells as well as enhanced intercellular communication under different pathological and physiological conditions, particularly in ischemic and hypoxic microenvironments, is crucial for post-injury nerve regeneration of PNS [7, 12, 48,49,50,51,52], which may explain the faster INRV in vivo and more significant pro-INRV effects of H-SCs-Exos that we observed.

In this study, we found that the INRV process after PNI was significantly disrupted by GW4869, an inhibitor of the exosomal shuttle. Emerging evidence demonstrates that SCs-Exos play a crucial role in nerve development and post-injury regeneration after PNI [32, 53,54,55]. Myelinated SCs negatively regulate intraneural angiogenesis during the postnatal period, significantly decreasing intraneural vessel density [56]. However, SCs and their derivatives, such as netrin-1, also have prominent pro-angiogenic potential in vitro and in vivo [56,57,58]. There is controversy regarding the effects of SCs on the INVS of PNS. Hypoxic precondition could enhance the pro-angiogenic and pro-neural regenerative effects of cells and their exosomes [59,60,61]. Similarly, in the central nervous system under ischemic-hypoxic conditions, the interactions between oligodendrocytes and endothelial cells promote neoangiogenesis to attenuate brain injury [62, 63]. Thus, we speculate that SCs are responsible for maintaining the homeostasis of INVS density and the ischemic-hypoxic conditions caused by disruption of INVS or mechanical stimuli after PNI, which induce the dedifferentiation of SCs and shifts the effects of SCs on the INVS by limiting their promotion.

Hypoxic or injurious stimuli are also intensive activators of glycolysis. The manipulation of EC glycolytic activity enabled us to accelerate or delay angiogenesis and organic regeneration [15, 17, 51, 64,65,66,67,68,69]. Several studies have reported that enhancement of OXPHOS inhibits angiogenic sprouts and extensions, whereas inhibition of OXPHOS promotes them [69,70,71,72]. Nerves could switch on EC metabolism in favor of glycolysis via releasing adrenergic and cholinergic neurotransmitters to promote angiogenesis [71, 73, 74]. In PNS, the upregulated glycolytic activity of SCs delays the degeneration of perturbed axons after PNI [75].

Several studies have found that exosomes are intimately implicated in intercellular metabolic regulation [76,77,78,79]. In the present study, we determined that SCs are also involved in the regulation of EC metabolic activities in favor of glycolysis through intercellular communication mediated by exosomes, whereas neurotransmitters promote post-injury INRV of PNS. MicroRNAs, a group of small non-coding RNAs with 18 to 25 nucleotides that are the most studied contents in the exosome, participate in various physio-pathological processes, such as hematopoiesis, aging, and tissue repair [80, 81]. miR-21-5p, a hypoxia-responsive and pro-angiogenic miRNA, was found to be highly enriched in SCs and their exosomes in our previous study and other studies [26, 31, 32]. In the present study, we consistently found strong upregulation of miR-21-5p in hypoxic-precondition SCs and their exosomes as well as injured nerve segments.

Recent studies have reported that miR-21-5p could also enhance glycolysis and concurrently attenuate OXPHOS in other cell types [40, 82, 83]. In this study, we determined that miR-21-5p is also a primary molecule of SCs-Exos in regulating EC metabolism and revascularization capacity to facilitate INRV and nerve regeneration after PNI. HIF-1α, a key transcription factor that regulates the expression of multiple downstream genes in a hypoxic environment after tissue injury, has been demonstrated to be extensively involved in glycolytic metabolism [84, 85]. Previous studies have reported that deletion of VHL, a component of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that binds to HIF-1α and leads to its polyubiquitination of the α subunit and degradation by the proteasome under normoxic conditions, strengthens HIF-1α stabilization and accumulation to promote glycolysis and angiogenesis [35, 86, 87].

Although it is well accepted that HIF-1α is a key promoter of nerve regeneration and neoangiogenesis [50, 61, 75, 88,89,90,91,92], the effects of HIF-1α on INRV after PNI remain unclear. In this study, we identified a new role of HIF-1α in regulating EC metabolism and vascularization capacity after PNI, as well as determined that SC-Exo-derived miR-21-5p directly targets VHL to regulate HIF-1α accumulation-mediated glycolysis of ECs to facilitate INRV after PNI. HIF-1α accumulation could simultaneously inhibit mitochondrial OXPHOS via the PDK1/PDH-E1α pathway [36,37,38,39]. However, we observed that the knockdown of HIF-1α with si-HIF-1α slightly reversed the inhibition of miR-21-5p mimic on endothelial OXPHOS. In further investigation, we found that PDH-E1α, the key enzyme catalyzing the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA for mitochondrial OXPHOS, is also a direct target of miR-21-5p in EC and that inhibition of PDH-E1α-controlled OXPHOS complementarily enhances the glycolysis of ECs after PNI, as previous studies reported [40, 93, 94].

This study had several limitations that should be considered when reviewing the findings. First, we were unable to elucidate the effects of other molecules, such as mRNA, proteins, and other non-coding RNAs in hypoxic-preconditioned SC-Exos in EC metabolism and vascularization capacity. Second, we did not explore other potential targets of miR-21-5p in regulating EC function after PNI. Third, we explored only the effects and underlying mechanisms of miR-21-5p from SC-Exos on INRV and not those of other sources. Despite these limitations, our study identified a novel role of SCs in facilitating INRV via the exosomal shuttle; a mechanism by which miR-21-5p regulates EC energy metabolism in favor of glycolysis; and a crucial link among exosomes, metabolism, angiogenesis, and nerve repair after PNI.

Conclusion

In this study, it was demonstrated that SC-Exo-regulated metabolic alteration of ECs via transferring of miR-21-5p and simultaneously targeting VHL to enhance HIF-1α accumulation-mediated glycolysis and PDH-E1α to inhibit mitochondrial OXPHOS, facilitated post-injury INRV. In addition, hypoxic precondition strongly increased miR-21-5p expression to further skew energic metabolism in favor of glycolysis after PNI. Our findings revealed a novel intrinsic mechanism of INRV after PNI, the targeting of which may provide a promising therapeutic strategy for post-injury regeneration and repair of PNS.

Materials and methods

Animals and sciatic nerve crush injury model

We conducted all experiments on animals in this study following the guidelines of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the US National Institutes of Health. The Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University approved all work in this study. We obtained adult male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 150 to 200 g and aged 6 to 8 weeks from the Animal Experiment Center, North Campus of Sun Yat-sen University. We housed the animals in a humid room at a constant temperature of 26 °C on a 12-h light-and-dark cycle and fed them with a standard chow preparation and water ad libitum. We housed the rats in an experimental environment for seven days to adapt them before the surgical procedure.

We performed the surgical procedure of sciatic nerve crush injury according to a previous study [95]. In brief, we anesthetized all experimental rats with isoflurane and aseptically operated on a sterile operative table after thorough disinfection. We made a 1.5-cm longitudinal incision on the dorsal side of the lower right limb and bluntly separated the subcutaneous fascia and muscles to expose the upper segment of the sciatic nerve. We used the same medium-sized straight hemostatic forceps to press the upper sites of the sciatic nerve 5 mm at the lower edge of the piriformis muscle to the last grid with an approximately 54 N compressive force with the tip for 30 s until the nerve became transparent. After rats being treated with saline, GW4869, Nor-SCs-Exos, and Hypoxia-SCs-Exos, we sutured the skin layer by layer. We intraperitoneally administered GW4869 (2.0 µg/g body weight) daily from five days before the procedure to five days after to inhibit the intraneural exosome paracrine.

Purification and culture of primary SCs

Primary SCs were obtained from the sciatic nerves of neonatal rat pups according to a previous study [96, 97]. In brief, the collected sciatic nerve segments were sliced and digested in 5 ml of 0.1% II collagenase solution and 5 ml of 0.25% trypsin solution for 45 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The supernatants were removed after centrifugation for 5 min at 400 g. The pellet was digested in 5 ml of 0.1 IV collagenase solution for 30 min and neutralized by Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cell suspension was filtered through a 40-µm strainer and centrifuged for 5 min at 400 g before supernatant removal. The washed cell pellet with DMEM containing 15% FBS, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 100 U/mL of penicillin was centrifuged again at 400 g for 5 min followed by supernatant discard. Finally, resuspended cells with DMEM D-valine containing 10% FBS, 2 mM of L-glutamine, 20 µg/mL of bovine pituitary extracts, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, 100 U/mL of penicillin, 5 µM of forskolin, and 0.25 µg/mL of amphotericin B were plated on a 3-mm petri dish precoated with 0.01% poly-l-lysine and 1 µg/mL of laminin for 24 h in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and incubated in same culture condition. The medium was changed every two days until 85% confluency was achieved. Passages 3 to 7 (P3–P7) of primary SCs were used for further experimentation.

Extraction and identification of exosomes

SC-Exos were purified from the supernatant through ultracentrifugation according to previous studies [28, 29]. Briefly, the cultured supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 300 ×g for 10 min and then at 2000 ×g for 20 min to remove cells and debris. The collected supernatant was transferred to a new tube for further centrifuging at 10,000 ×g for 30 min using a 0.22-µm filter to remove all cellular debris. The collected supernatant was sequentially ultracentrifuged twice at 100,000 ×g for 70 min (Beckman Coulter Optima L-100 XP Ultracentrifuge, SW 32 Rotor; Beckman Coulter Indianapolis, IN, USA). All centrifugation procedures were performed at 4 °C. The pellets were resuspended and stored at − 80 °C and the exosomal morphology characterized by TEM at 100 kV (JEM-1200EX; Tokyo, Japan) and the concentrations and diameters of SC-Exos measured with a Nanosight Tracking Analyzer (NS300; Malvern, UK). Finally, a western blot was performed to identify the exosome-related factors. The primary antibodies were listed in Table S3 including anti-CD63, anti-CD9, anti-TSG101 and anti-calnexin.

Exosome uptake assay

Purified normoxic and hypoxic SCs-derived exosomes (Nor-SCs-Exos and Hypo-SCs-Exos) were labeled for 1 h with 1 µM of DiR staining reagents (Umibio, Shanghai, China) in a 37 °C incubator according to the manufacturer’s instructions as previously reported with slight modifications [98]. DiR-labeled Nor-SCs-Exos and Hypo-SCs-Exos were co-cultured with HUVECs at a concentration of 100 µg/ml in a 37 °C-cell incubator with 5% CO2 for 24 h. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI for 15 min at room temperature. Images were taken with a confocal fluorescence microscope (ZEISS, Jena, Germany).

Cell transfection and treatment

HUVECs were plated in a 6-well plate and transfected with 30 nM of miR-21-5p mimic NC, miR-21-5p mimic, miR-21-5p inhibitor (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China), 50 nM of si-NC or si-VHL, si-NC or si-HIF-1α, and si-NC or si-PDH-E1α (RiboBio) when cells reached 50 to 60% confluence. The sequences of the small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), miR-21-5p mimic, and inhibitors used in this study are shown in Table S1. siRNA Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermofisher Scientific, Agawam, MA, USA) was used for cell transfection experiments according to the manufacturer’s instructions. HUVECs were treated with 200 µg/ml of N-SCs-Exos or H-SCs-Exos.

Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay

Luciferase reporter gene assay constructs (3′UTR-NC, 3′UTR-VHL, 3′UTR-VHL-mutant, 3′UTR-PDH-E1α, and 3′UTR- PDH-E1α-mutant), miRNA (miRNA-NC or miR-21-5p), and Renilla luciferase (GeneChem, Shanghai, China) were co-transfected into HUVECs cells (Shanghai Institute of Cell Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences) using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After transfection for 48 h, cells were harvested and lysed. A Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used to measure luciferase activity according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each experiment was repeated three times.

Tube formation assay

Transfected or treated HUVECs were resuspended with DMEM containing 10% PBS, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 100 U/mL of penicillin and then added into a 96-well culture plate precoated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at a density of 2 × 104 cells per well for 10 to 12 h at 37 °C. Images of tubule formation was visualized and taken under an inverted fluorescent microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Tubes were manually counted and the branches were quantified using Image J software.

Cell invasion, migration, proliferation assay

HUVEC invasion was assayed using a 24-well Transwells plate. In brief, 600 µl of DMEM containing 10% FBS, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin was added to the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. Transfected exosome-treated HUVECs at a 1 × 105 density were added to the upper chamber precoated with 200 µl of Matrigel diluted with serum-free DMEM at a ratio of 1:8 for 48 h at 37 °C. Non-invasive HUVECs were removed, and invasive cells were fixed with 100% methyl alcohol for 20 min before being stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Invasive cells were counted and images were taken using a brightfield microscope. HUVEC migration was assessed using scratch assay. Transfected or exosome-treated HUVECs were cultured in a 6-well culture plate until 70% confluence. A 200-µl pipette tip was used to scratch three liner wounds per well, and HUVECs were washed three times with sterile PBS buffer to remove the floating cells. HUVECs were continually cultivated in a 37 °C 5% CO2 incubator. Scarifications were recorded one-to-one under an inverted phase-contrast microscope (ECLIPSE Ti2-U; Nikon) at 0 and 48 h after the scratch.

EdU assay was used to evaluate cell proliferation. Briefly, transfected or treated HUVECs at a density of 5 × 104 were seeded onto a 48-well plate. A 10-µM EdU-labeling reagent (Ribobio) was added to the HUVECs and co-incubated with them for 2 h. After being washed with PBS, HUVECs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, neutralized by 2 mg/ml of glycine, and permeabilized by 0.5% TritonX-100 for 15 min. HUVEC proliferation was detected using a Cell-Light EdU Apollo567 In Vitro Kit (Ribobio) and images were acquired using a fluorescent microscope (ECLIPSE Ti2-U; Nikon). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was used to evaluate cell viability. Briefly, HUVECs at a density of 1 × 104 were seeded onto a 96-well plate and transfected with the indicated oligonucleotides or treated with indicated exosomes. After 0, 24, 48, and 72 h, 10 µl of CCK-8 reagent was added to HUVECs per well for 2 h, and the absorbance (optical density value) at 450 nm was measured using an Eon Microplate Spectrophotometer (Biotek, Winooski, Vermont, USA).

Extracellular acid rate and oxygen consumption rate assay

ECAR and OCR were determined using a Seahorse XFe96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ECAR reflects glycolysis and OCR reflects cell respiration. Briefly, HUVECs (8,000 cells/well) were seeded into a Seahorse XFe96 cell culture plate containing 100 µl of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 100 U/mL of penicillin and then treated or transfected with related exosomes or oligonucleotides for 48 h. The DMEM was replaced with a non-buffered medium, and the cell culture plate was maintained in a non-CO2 incubator for 60 min. For the ECAR assay, 10 mM of glucose, 2 µM of oligomycin (mitochondrial/ATP synthase inhibitor), and 100 mM of 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) were injected into each well. For the OCR assay, 2 µM of oligomycin, 1 µM of carbonylcyanide-4-trifluoromethoxy-phenylhydrazone (FCCP), and 1.5 µM of rotenone/antimycin A (Rot/AA) were sequentially auto-injected into each experimental well at specific time points.

Pyruvate, lactate, and acetyl-CoA production assay

Lactate, pyruvate, and acetyl-CoA levels were separately determined using a Lactate Assay Kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China), Pyruvate Assay Kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute), and an Acetyl-Coenzyme Assay Kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. All experiments were performed at least three times.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted from HUVECs, exosomes, and tissues using RNAiso Plus (Takara Bio, Tokyo, Japan). The cDNA was synthesized and amplified using a PrimeScrip RT Reagent Kit (Takara) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. qRT-PCR was performed using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Takara). The sequences of primers (Ribobio) used in this study are listed in Table S2.

Western blot

Processed HUVECs or sciatic tissues were lysed by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) using a buffer containing 1% protease inhibitor and 1% phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoridepms (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein concentration was detected using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China). Pierce LDS Sample Loading Buffer (4X) (Thermo Scientific) was added to the collected supernatant at a ratio of 1:3 and the protein was maintained in a 70 °C-water bath for 10 min. A total of 20 to 30 µg protein per lane was separated using 7.5 to 12.5% sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Beyotime). After blocking with 5% skim milk at room temperature for 60 min, membranes were incubated with the first antibodies as listed in Table S3 at 4 °C overnight. The next day membranes were washed with 1 × Tris-Buffered Saline, 0.1% Tween 20 Detergent (TBST) three times and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The results were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Beyotime) and quantified by ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.32 J, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Immunohistochemical staining

In brief, injured sciatic nerve segments were quickly dissected and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h or overnight at 4 °C, rinsed with 0.1 mM PBS solution, and cryoprotected in 10% sucrose in PBS with 0.1% sodium azide for 24 h before sciatic nerves were cut into 14-µm sections. The primary antibodies and staining used were anti-CD31, anti-LDHA and anti-PDH-E1α as listed in Table S3. The secondary antibodies used were Alexa 488/594 goat anti-rat, anti-rabbit, or anti-mouse (Invitrogen). All immunohistochemistry followed an indirect immunostaining protocol where the peroxidase-diaminobenzidine (DAB) reaction was used for immunostaining the sciatic nerves and DAB (brown) plus DAB-NICHEL (blue) for reactions.

Immunofluorescence

In brief, the crush-injury segment of the sciatic nerve was collected and fully fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h at 4 °C. A fixed sciatic nerve was embedded in the paraffin block and then cut into 5-µm sections. After being blocked in 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature, sections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C in a blocking buffer. The sections were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature in the dark after being washed 3 times in a blocking buffer. Additional primary antibodies used were anti-NF200 (1:50; Cell Signaling Technology, #30,564) and anti-MBP (1:50; Cell Signaling Technology; #78,896). Nuclei were incubated with DAPI (Beyotime, P0131) for 5 min at room temperature. Images were acquired using a confocal fluorescence microscope (ZEISS, Jena, Germany).

Sciatic function index measurement

The sciatic nerve index (SFI) is a well-characterized index widely used to assess nerve function and regeneration after sciatic nerve injury. SFI was measured one day before axotomy and nerve crush and at 2 and 8 weeks postoperatively. SFI was calculated using three parameters, including total print length (P; from the tip of the third toe to heel), toe spread (TS; from the first to the fifth toe), and intermediate toe spread (IT; from the second to the fourth toe). The calculative formula is as follows:

$$\text{S}\text{F}\text{I}=\frac{\text{P}{\text{L}}_{\text{R}}-\text{P}{\text{L}}_{\text{L}}}{\text{P}{\text{L}}_{\text{L}}}\times (-38.3)+$$
$$\frac{\text{T}{\text{S}}_{\text{R}}-\text{T}{\text{S}}_{\text{L}}}{\text{T}{\text{S}}_{\text{L}}}\times 109+13.3\times \frac{\text{I}\text{T}{\text{S}}_{\text{R}}-\text{I}\text{T}{\text{S}}_{\text{L}}}{\text{I}\text{T}{\text{S}}_{\text{L}}}-8.8$$

where R is the right side and L is the left side.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 software. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between different experimental conditions were performed using the Student’s paired t test and multiple comparisons were performed using analysis of variance. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05.

Data availability

The data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Douglas W. Zochodne. Neurobiology of Peripheral nerve regeneration. Cambridge University Press; 2008.

  2. Sulaiman W, Gordon T. Neurobiology of peripheral nerve injury, regeneration, and functional recovery: from bench top research to bedside application. Ochsner J. 2013;13(1):100–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brecknell JE, Fawcett JW. Axonal regeneration. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1996;71(2):227–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Alessandro D, Ricci C, Milazzo M, Strangis G, Forli F, Buda G et al. Piezoelectric signals in vascularized bone regeneration. Biomolecules. 2021;11(11).

  5. Riley PR, Smart N. Vascularizing the heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;91(2):260–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saffari TM, Bedar M, Hundepool CA, Bishop AT, Shin AY. The role of vascularization in nerve regeneration of nerve graft. Neural Regen Res. 2020;15(9):1573–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma T, Hao Y, Li S, Xia B, Gao X, Zheng Y, et al. Sequential oxygen supply system promotes peripheral nerve regeneration by enhancing Schwann cells survival and angiogenesis. Biomaterials. 2022;289:121755.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Asplund M, Nilsson M, Jacobsson A, von Holst H. Incidence of traumatic peripheral nerve injuries and amputations in Sweden between 1998 and 2006. Neuroepidemiology. 2009;32(3):217–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li M, Cheng X, Feng S, Zhu H, Lu P, Zhang P, et al. Skin precursor-derived Schwann cells accelerate in vivo prevascularization of tissue-engineered nerves to promote peripheral nerve regeneration. Glia. 2023;71(7):1755–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang H, Zhang P, Lu P, Cai X, Wang G, Xu X, et al. Neural tissue-engineered prevascularization in vivo enhances peripheral neuroregeneration via rapid vascular inosculation. Mater Today Bio. 2023;21:100718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferretti A, Boschi E, Stefani A, Spiga S, Romanelli M, Lemmi M, et al. Angiogenesis and nerve regeneration in a model of human skin equivalent transplant. Life Sci. 2003;73(15):1985–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cattin A-L, Burden JJ, Van Emmenis L, Mackenzie FE, Hoving JJA, Garcia Calavia N, et al. Macrophage-Induced Blood vessels Guide Schwann cell-mediated regeneration of peripheral nerves. Cell. 2015;162(5):1127–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kontos CD, Annex BH. Angiogenesis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 1999;1(2):165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen Z, Morales JE, Avci N, Guerrero PA, Rao G, Seo JH et al. The vascular endothelial cell-expressed prion protein doppel promotes angiogenesis and blood-brain barrier development. Development. 2020;147(18).

  15. Yu P, Wilhelm K, Dubrac A, Tung JK, Alves TC, Fang JS, et al. FGF-dependent metabolic control of vascular development. Nature. 2017;545(7653):224–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai L, Reineke E, Hamilton DJ, Cooke JP. Glycolytic switch is required for transdifferentiation to endothelial lineage. Circulation. 2019;139(1):119–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. De Bock K, Georgiadou M, Schoors S, Kuchnio A, Wong BW, Cantelmo AR, et al. Role of PFKFB3-driven glycolysis in vessel sprouting. Cell. 2013;154(3):651–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Veys K, Fan Z, Ghobrial M, Bouché A, García-Caballero M, Vriens K, et al. Role of the GLUT1 glucose transporter in postnatal CNS angiogenesis and blood-brain Barrier Integrity. Circul Res. 2020;127(4):466–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun D, Chen S, Li S, Wang N, Zhang S, Xu L, et al. Enhancement of glycolysis-dependent DNA repair regulated by FOXO1 knockdown via PFKFB3 attenuates hyperglycemia-induced endothelial oxidative stress injury. Redox Biol. 2023;59:102589.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jessen KR, Mirsky R, Lloyd AC. Schwann cells: development and role in nerve repair. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(7):a020487.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang R, Chen S, Wang X, Gu X, Yi S. Cell populations in neonatal rat peripheral nerves identified by single-cell transcriptomics. Glia. 2021;69(3):765–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang M, Jordan V, Blenkiron C, Chamley LW. Biodistribution of extracellular vesicles following administration into animals: a systematic review. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10(8):e12085.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang K, Zhou Q, Qiao B, Shao B, Hu S, Wang G, et al. Exosome-derived noncoding RNAs: function, mechanism, and application in tumor angiogenesis. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2022;27:983–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng Z, Zhao Y, Chen Q, Zhu S, Niu Y, Ye Z, et al. Hypoxic exosomal HIF-1α-stabilizing circZNF91 promotes chemoresistance of normoxic pancreatic cancer cells via enhancing glycolysis. Oncogene. 2021;40(36):5505–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hogan SE, Rodriguez Salazar MP, Cheadle J, Glenn R, Medrano C, Petersen TH, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes improve mitochondrial health in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2019;316(5):L723–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y-P, Yang Y-D, Mou F-F, Zhu J, Li H, Zhao T-T, et al. Exosome-mediated miR-21 was involved in the Promotion of Structural and Functional Recovery Effect produced by electroacupuncture in sciatic nerve Injury. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:7530102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li C, Li X, Shi Z, Wu P, Fu J, Tang J, et al. Exosomes from LPS-preconditioned bone marrow MSCs accelerated peripheral nerve regeneration via M2 macrophage polarization: involvement of TSG-6/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway. Exp Neurol. 2022;356:114139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lobb RJ, Becker M, Wen SW, Wong CSF, Wiegmans AP, Leimgruber A, et al. Optimized exosome isolation protocol for cell culture supernatant and human plasma. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4:27031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo Y, Gao D, Wang P, Lou C, Li T, Niu W, et al. Optimized culture methods for isolating small extracellular vesicles derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Extracell Vesicles. 2021;10(6):e12065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Su L, Li R, Zhang Z, Liu J, Du J, Wei H. Identification of altered exosomal microRNAs and mRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2022;73:101497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ning X-J, Lu X-H, Luo J-C, Chen C, Gao Q, Li Z-Y, et al. Molecular mechanism of microRNA-21 promoting Schwann cell proliferation and axon regeneration during injured nerve repair. RNA Biol. 2020;17(10):1508–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang L, Chopp M, Szalad A, Lu X, Zhang Y, Wang X, et al. Exosomes Derived from Schwann cells ameliorate peripheral neuropathy in type 2 Diabetic mice. Diabetes. 2020;69(4):749–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nijhuis A, Thompson H, Adam J, Parker A, Gammon L, Lewis A, et al. Remodelling of microRNAs in colorectal cancer by hypoxia alters metabolism profiles and 5-fluorouracil resistance. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(8):1552–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Konieczny P, Xing Y, Sidhu I, Subudhi I, Mansfield KP, Hsieh B, et al. Interleukin-17 governs hypoxic adaptation of injured epithelium. Science. 2022;377(6602):eabg9302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao D, Zheng S, Wang X, Liu H, Zhao K, Li L, et al. iASPP is essential for HIF-1α stabilization to promote angiogenesis and glycolysis via attenuating VHL-mediated protein degradation. Oncogene. 2022;41(13):1944–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cenigaonandia-Campillo A, Serna-Blasco R, Gómez-Ocabo L, Solanes-Casado S, Baños-Herraiz N, Puerto-Nevado LD, et al. Vitamin C activates pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) targeting the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in hypoxic mutant colon cancer. Theranostics. 2021;11(8):3595–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen M, Liu M, Luo Y, Cao J, Zeng F, Yang L, et al. Celastrol protects against Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in mice by inhibiting glycolysis through Targeting HIF-1/PDK1 Axis. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:7420507.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Amir MS, Chiba N, Seong CH, Kusuyama J, Eiraku N, Ohnishi T, et al. HIF-1α plays an essential role in BMP9-mediated osteoblast differentiation through the induction of a glycolytic enzyme, PDK1. J Cell Physiol. 2022;237(4):2183–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu D, Huang R-T, Hamanaka RB, Krause M, Oh M-J, Kuo C-H et al. Is required for disturbed flow-induced metabolic reprogramming in human and porcine vascular endothelium. Elife. 2017;6.

  40. Zhuang L, Zhang B, Liu X, Lin L, Wang L, Hong Z, et al. Exosomal mir-21-5p derived from cisplatin-resistant SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells promotes glycolysis and inhibits chemosensitivity of its progenitor SKOV3 cells by targeting PDHA1. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45(10):2140–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang C, Cui J, Cao L, Tian X, Miao Y, Wang Y, et al. ISGylation of EMD promotes its interaction with PDHA to inhibit aerobic oxidation in lung adenocarcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2022;26(19):5078–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Z, Yu M, Fei B, Fang X, Ma T, Wang D. miR–21–5p targets PDHA1 to regulate glycolysis and cancer progression in gastric cancer. Oncol Rep. 2018;40(5):2955–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao L, Geng R, Huang Y, Zhang J, Cheng H, Zhou C, et al. AP2α negatively regulates PDHA1 in cervical cancer cells to promote aggressive features and aerobic glycolysis in vitro and in vivo. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023;34(5):e59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sharma K, Zhang Y, Paudel KR, Kachelmeier A, Hansbro PM, Shi X. The emerging role of Pericyte-Derived Extracellular vesicles in Vascular and Neurological Health. Cells. 2022;11:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Caillaud M, Richard L, Vallat J-M, Desmoulière A, Billet F. Peripheral nerve regeneration and intraneural revascularization. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14(1):24–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lundborg G. The intrinsic vascularization of human peripheral nerves: structural and functional aspects. J Hand Surg Am. 1979;4(1):34–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Thibodeau A, Galbraith T, Fauvel CM, Khuong HT, Berthod F. Repair of peripheral nerve injuries using a prevascularized cell-based tissue-engineered nerve conduit. Biomaterials. 2022;280:121269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Segarra M, Aburto MR, Cop F, Llaó-Cid C, Härtl R, Damm M et al. Endothelial Dab1 signaling orchestrates neuro-glia-vessel communication in the central nervous system. Science. 2018;361(6404).

  49. Segarra M, Kirchmaier BC, Acker-Palmer A. A vascular perspective on neuronal migration. Mech Dev. 2015;138:17–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cho Y, Shin JE, Ewan EE, Oh YM, Pita-Thomas W, Cavalli V. Activating Injury-responsive genes with Hypoxia enhances Axon Regeneration through neuronal HIF-1α. Neuron. 2015;88(4):720–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang J, Muri J, Fitzgerald G, Gorski T, Gianni-Barrera R, Masschelein E et al. Endothelial lactate controls muscle regeneration from ischemia by inducing M2-like macrophage polarization. Cell Metab. 2020;31(6).

  52. Xi H, Wang C, Li Q, Ye Q, Zhu Y, Mao Y. S-Propargyl-cysteine ameliorates peripheral nerve Injury through Microvascular Reconstruction. Antioxid (Basel). 2023;12(2).

  53. López-Leal R, Díaz-Viraqué F, Catalán RJ, Saquel C, Enright A, Iraola G et al. Schwann cell reprogramming into repair cells increases miRNA-21 expression in exosomes promoting axonal growth. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(12).

  54. Ching RC, Kingham PJ. The role of exosomes in peripheral nerve regeneration. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10(5):743–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Lopez-Verrilli MA, Picou F, Court FA. Schwann cell-derived exosomes enhance axonal regeneration in the peripheral nervous system. Glia. 2013;61(11):1795–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Taïb S, Lamandé N, Martin S, Coulpier F, Topilko P, Brunet I. Myelinating Schwann cells and Netrin-1 control intra-nervous vascularization of the developing mouse sciatic nerve. Elife. 2022;11.

  57. Yu J, Ye K, Li J, Wei Y, Zhou J, Ni W, et al. Schwann-like cell conditioned medium promotes angiogenesis and nerve regeneration. Cell Tissue Bank. 2022;23(1):101–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hao Z, Ren L, Zhang Z, Yang Z, Wu S, Liu G, et al. A multifunctional neuromodulation platform utilizing Schwann cell-derived exosomes orchestrates bone microenvironment via immunomodulation, angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Bioact Mater. 2023;23:206–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Li L, Mu J, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Ma T, Chen L, et al. Stimulation by Exosomes from Hypoxia Preconditioned Human umbilical vein endothelial cells facilitates mesenchymal stem cells angiogenic function for spinal cord repair. ACS Nano. 2022;16(7):10811–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Liang Y, Wu JH, Zhu JH, Yang H. Exosomes secreted by Hypoxia-pre-conditioned adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce neuronal apoptosis in rats with spinal cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2022;39(9–10):701–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. David BT, Curtin JJ, Brown JL, Coutts DJC, Boles NC, Hill CE. Treatment with hypoxia-mimetics protects cultured rat Schwann cells against oxidative stress-induced cell death. Glia. 2021;69(9):2215–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chavali M, Ulloa-Navas MJ, Pérez-Borredá P, Garcia-Verdugo JM, McQuillen PS, Huang EJ et al. Wnt-dependent oligodendroglial-endothelial interactions regulate White Matter Vascularization and Attenuate Injury. Neuron. 2020;108(6).

  63. Zhang S, Kim B, Zhu X, Gui X, Wang Y, Lan Z, et al. Glial type specific regulation of CNS angiogenesis by HIFα-activated different signaling pathways. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Eelen G, de Zeeuw P, Treps L, Harjes U, Wong BW, Carmeliet P. Endothelial cell metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(1).

  65. Macklin BL, Lin Y-Y, Emmerich K, Wisniewski E, Polster BM, Konstantopoulos K, et al. Intrinsic epigenetic control of angiogenesis in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelium regulates vascular regeneration. NPJ Regen Med. 2022;7(1):28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Greuter T, Yaqoob U, Gan C, Jalan-Sakrikar N, Kostallari E, Lu J, et al. Mechanotransduction-induced glycolysis epigenetically regulates a CXCL1-dominant angiocrine signaling program in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. J Hepatol. 2022;77(3):723–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Perrotta P, de Vries MR, Peeters B, Guns P-J, De Meyer GRY, Quax PHA, et al. PFKFB3 gene deletion in endothelial cells inhibits intraplaque angiogenesis and lesion formation in a murine model of venous bypass grafting. Angiogenesis. 2022;25(1):129–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sun J, Lin Z, Liao Z, Wu Z, Li H, Wang H. Small extracellular vesicles derived from human adipose-derived stem cells regulate energetic metabolism through the activation of YAP/TAZ pathway facilitating angiogenesis. Cell Biol Int. 2022.

  69. Sakamuri S, Sure VN, Kolli L, Liu N, Evans WR, Sperling JA, et al. Glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylation defects precede the development of Senescence in Primary Human Brain Microvascular endothelial cells. Geroscience. 2022;44(4):1975–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Bayona-Bafaluy MP, Esteban O, Ascaso J, Montoya J, Ruiz-Pesini E. Oxidative phosphorylation inducers fight pathological angiogenesis. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(9):1731–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Zahalka AH, Arnal-Estapé A, Maryanovich M, Nakahara F, Cruz CD, Finley LWS, et al. Adrenergic nerves activate an angio-metabolic switch in prostate cancer. Science. 2017;358(6361):321–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Stone OA, El-Brolosy M, Wilhelm K, Liu X, Romão AM, Grillo E, et al. Loss of pyruvate kinase M2 limits growth and triggers innate immune signaling in endothelial cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4077.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Dong Q, Qi B, Zhang B, Zhuang X, Chen S, Zhou Q, et al. Overactivation of Norepinephrine-β2-Adrenergic receptor Axis promotes corneal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023;64(3):20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Hayakawa Y, Wang TC. Nerves switch on angiogenic metabolism. Science. 2017;358(6361):305–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Babetto E, Wong KM, Beirowski B. A glycolytic shift in Schwann cells supports injured axons. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(10):1215–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Sun J, Lin Z, Liao Z, Wu Z, Li H, Wang H. Small extracellular vesicles derived from human adipose-derived stem cells regulate energetic metabolism through the activation of YAP/TAZ pathway facilitating angiogenesis. Cell Biol Int. 2023;47(2):451–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wu Q, Li J, Li Z, Sun S, Zhu S, Wang L, et al. Exosomes from the tumour-adipocyte interplay stimulate beige/brown differentiation and reprogram metabolism in stromal adipocytes to promote tumour progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Wu J, Dong T, Chen T, Sun J, Luo J, He J, et al. Hepatic exosome-derived miR-130a-3p attenuates glucose intolerance via suppressing PHLPP2 gene in adipocyte. Metabolism. 2020;103:154006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Clement E, Lazar I, Attané C, Carrié L, Dauvillier S, Ducoux-Petit M, et al. Adipocyte extracellular vesicles carry enzymes and fatty acids that stimulate mitochondrial metabolism and remodeling in tumor cells. EMBO J. 2020;39(3):e102525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Farh KK-H, Grimson A, Jan C, Lewis BP, Johnston WK, Lim LP, et al. The widespread impact of mammalian MicroRNAs on mRNA repression and evolution. Science. 2005;310(5755):1817–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhang L, Wei W, Ai X, Kilic E, Hermann DM, Venkataramani V, et al. Extracellular vesicles from hypoxia-preconditioned microglia promote angiogenesis and repress apoptosis in stroke mice via the TGF-β/Smad2/3 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(11):1068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Bartman CM, Oyama Y, Brodsky K, Khailova L, Walker L, Koeppen M, et al. Intense light-elicited upregulation of miR-21 facilitates glycolysis and cardioprotection through Per2-dependent mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0176243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Dai Q, Li N, Zhou X. Increased miR-21a provides metabolic advantages through suppression of FBP1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7(11):2121–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Vora M, Pyonteck SM, Popovitchenko T, Matlack TL, Prashar A, Kane NS, et al. The hypoxia response pathway promotes PEP carboxykinase and gluconeogenesis in C. Elegans. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):6168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Ma T, Patel H, Babapoor-Farrokhran S, Franklin R, Semenza GL, Sodhi A, et al. KSHV induces aerobic glycolysis and angiogenesis through HIF-1-dependent upregulation of pyruvate kinase 2 in Kaposi’s sarcoma. Angiogenesis. 2015;18(4):477–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhu Y, Zhao Y, Zou L, Zhang D, Aki D, Liu Y-C. The E3 ligase VHL promotes follicular helper T cell differentiation via glycolytic-epigenetic control. J Exp Med. 2019;216(7):1664–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Li Q, Li D, Zhang X, Wan Q, Zhang W, Zheng M et al. E3 ligase VHL promotes Group 2 innate lymphoid cell maturation and function via glycolysis inhibition and induction of Interleukin-33 receptor. Immunity. 2018;48(2).

  88. Rojas DR, Tegeder I, Kuner R, Agarwal N. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α protects peripheral sensory neurons from diabetic peripheral neuropathy by suppressing accumulation of reactive oxygen species. J Mol Med (Berl). 2018;96(12):1395–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Takai Y, Misu T, Nishiyama S, Ono H, Kuroda H, Nakashima I, et al. Hypoxia-like tissue injury and glial response contribute to Balo concentric lesion development. Neurology. 2016;87(19):2000–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Alam T, Maruyama H, Li C, Pastuhov SI, Nix P, Bastiani M, et al. Axotomy-induced HIF-serotonin signalling axis promotes axon regeneration in C. Elegans. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Rey S, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent mechanisms of vascularization and vascular remodelling. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;86(2):236–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Chen L, Endler A, Shibasaki F. Hypoxia and angiogenesis: regulation of hypoxia-inducible factors via novel binding factors. Exp Mol Med. 2009;41(12):849–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhang J, Zhang L, Nie J, Lin Y, Li Y, Xu W, et al. Calcineurin inactivation inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity and induces the Warburg effect. Oncogene. 2021;40(49):6692–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Sun J, Li J, Guo Z, Sun L, Juan C, Zhou Y, et al. Overexpression of pyruvate dehydrogenase E1α subunit inhibits Warburg Effect and induces cell apoptosis through mitochondria-mediated pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncol Res. 2019;27(4):407–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Zhang R-R, Chen S-L, Cheng Z-C, Shen Y-Y, Yi S, Xu H. Characteristics of cytokines in the sciatic nerve stumps and DRGs after rat sciatic nerve crush injury. Mil Med Res. 2020;7(1):57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Kaewkhaw R, Scutt AM, Haycock JW. Integrated culture and purification of rat Schwann cells from freshly isolated adult tissue. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(11):1996–2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Malheiro A, Seijas-Gamardo A, Harichandan A, Mota C, Wieringa P, Moroni L. Development of an in vitro biomimetic peripheral neurovascular platform. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(28):31567–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Liu Y, Li Y-P, Xiao L-M, Chen L-K, Zheng S-Y, Zeng E-M, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from M2 microglia reduce ischemic brain injury through microRNA-135a-5p/TXNIP/NLRP3 axis. Lab Invest. 2021;101(7):837–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the “five-five” project construction project of the Third Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (No.2023WW504); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81571202); the Guangzhou Science and Technology Project, grant number (No.202201020578); the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, grant number (No.2022A1515012433).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jun Sun and Hui Wang conceived the idea and designed the study. Jun Sun, Qiuhua Zeng, Zhimin Wu, and Zhi Liao analyzed the data, performed the experiments, and analyzed the data. Jun Sun and Qiuhua Zeng wrote the manuscript. Hao Li, Qun Gao, Zhangyu Li, and Cong Ling collected data and prepared experimental reagents. Chuan Chen, Baoyu Zhang, Jun Sun, Zhimin Wu, Zhi Liao, and Hao Li analyzed the data and discussed the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chuan Chen or Hui Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal experiment protocol was approved by the ethical review board of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, China, and was performed according to its guidelines strictly.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, J., Zeng, Q., Wu, Z. et al. Enhancing intraneural revascularization following peripheral nerve injury through hypoxic Schwann-cell-derived exosomes: an insight into endothelial glycolysis. J Nanobiotechnol 22, 283 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02536-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-024-02536-y

Keywords