Nanoparticle-based delivery of siDCAMKL-1 increases microRNA-144 and inhibits colorectal cancer tumor growth via a Notch-1 dependent mechanism
© Sureban et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 13 June 2011
Accepted: 19 September 2011
Published: 19 September 2011
The development of effective drug delivery systems capable of transporting small interfering RNA (siRNA) has been elusive. We have previously reported that colorectal cancer tumor xenograft growth was arrested following treatment with liposomal preparation of siDCAMKL-1. In this report, we have utilized Nanoparticle (NP) technology to deliver DCAMKL-1 specific siRNA to knockdown potential key cancer regulators. In this study, mRNA/miRNA were analyzed using real-time RT-PCR and protein by western blot/immunohistochemistry. siDCAMKL-1 was encapsulated in Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-based NPs (NP-siDCAMKL-1); Tumor xenografts were generated in nude mice, treated with NP-siDCAMKL-1 and DAPT (γ-secretase inhibitor) alone and in combination. To measure let-7a and miR-144 expression in vitro, HCT116 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the firefly luciferase gene with let-7a and miR-144 miRNA binding sites in the 3'UTR.
Administration of NP-siDCAMKL-1 into HCT116 xenografts resulted in tumor growth arrest, downregulation of proto-oncogene c-Myc and Notch-1 via let-7a and miR-144 miRNA-dependent mechanisms, respectively. A corresponding reduction in let-7a and miR-144 specific luciferase activity was observed in vitro. Moreover, an upregulation of EMT inhibitor miR-200a and downregulation of the EMT-associated transcription factors ZEB1, ZEB2, Snail and Slug were observed in vivo. Lastly, DAPT-mediated inhibition of Notch-1 resulted in HCT116 tumor growth arrest and down regulation of Notch-1 via a miR-144 dependent mechanism.
These findings demonstrate that nanoparticle-based delivery of siRNAs directed at critical targets such as DCAMKL-1 may provide a novel approach to treat cancer through the regulation of endogenous miRNAs.
Colorectal cancer is the second most common tumor type in the US and is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality, accounting for nearly 9% of all cancer-related deaths . In the gut, tumorigenesis arises from the stem cell population located near the base of intestinal and colonic crypts . We have recently reported that the putative intestinal stem cell marker musashi-1 (Msi-1) regulates Notch-1 in colorectal cancer . Msi-1 is a positive regulator of Notch signaling through translational repression of m-numb mRNA (an inhibitor of Notch signaling) .
The novel putative intestinal and pancreatic stem cell marker DCAMKL-1 [5–7], a microtubule-associated kinase is upregulated in colorectal and pancreatic cancers and plays a functional role in tumorigenesis through regulation of the tumor suppressor microRNAs (let-7a, miR-200a and miR-144) and their downstream targets such as c-Myc, KRAS, ZEB1, ZEB2 and Notch-1 [8, 9].
Post-transcriptional silencing of disease-associated genes using exogenous short interfering RNA (siRNA) is an exciting new strategy to treat various human diseases [10, 11]. However, the clinical application of siRNA has been hindered by its rapid degradation, nonspecific distribution and poor cellular uptake . Consequently, delivery systems capable of protecting and transporting siRNA through both extracellular and intracellular barriers to reach the site of action in the cytosol are required for successful development of siRNA-based therapeutics . Nonviral siRNA delivery systems such as cationic lipids, cationic polymers, and cell-penetrating peptides have been studied intensively. However, the use of cationic vectors for clinical applications has been severely limited by their high toxicity, low serum stability, nonspecific immune-stimulating effects, and poor biodegradability .
The use of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) or PLGA nanoparticles (NPs) has emerged as a powerful potential methodology for carrying both small and large molecules of therapeutic importance, as well as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. This utility derives primarily from: (a) physiologic compatibility of PLGA and its monomers, polyglycolic acid (PGA) and polylactic acid (PLA), all of which have been established to be safe for human use for more than 30 years in various biomedical applications including drug delivery systems ; (b) the commercial availability of a variety of PLGA formulations which allow for control over the rate and duration of molecules released for optimal physiological response [16, 17]; (c) the biodegradability of PLGA materials, which provides for sustained release of the encapsulated molecules under physiological conditions, and conversion of PLGA to nontoxic, low-molecular-weight products that are readily eliminated ; and (d) the ability to manufacture PLGA nanoscale particles (< 500 nm) for potential evasion of the immune phagocytic system or fabrication into microparticles on the cellular scale for targeted delivery of drugs or as antigen-presenting systems . This unique combination of properties coupled with flexibility during fabrication has led to interest in modifying the PLGA surface for specific attachment to cells or organs in the body [20, 21] to support drug delivery and tissue engineering applications.
We have recently demonstrated that targeted inhibition of DCAMKL-1 resulted in induction of key tumor suppressor miRNAs and subsequent abrogation of several critical oncogenic pathways [8, 9]. In this report, we use PLGA NPs as a delivery vehicle for siDCAMKL-1 to study the effect on colon cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo.
DCAMKL-is increased in various human cancers
Nanoparticle-based siRNA delivery
PLGA NPs have primarily been used as a vehicle for pharmaceutical delivery of nucleotides, hormones, or drugs to target tissues . Here, we employed a PLGA NP-based siRNA delivery approach as an alternative to liposomal encapsulation, which we previously used [3, 9, 23]. Figure 1B demonstrates a scanning electron micrograph of PLGA nanoparticle-encapsulated siRNA. Total RNA isolated from HCT116 cells treated with NPs (containing 1.4 nM of siDCAMKL-1 and 10 nM of siSCR) separately and transfection reagent (Ambion) for 48 h was subjected to real-time RT-PCR analysis for DCAMKL-1. We observed a reduction in DCAMKL-1 mRNA following treatment with siDCAMKL-1 alone or encapsulated in NPs; these results are similar to our previous experimental observations . Less siRNA (7-fold) was required, however, when delivered encapsulated in PLGA-NPs (Figure 1C).
DCAMKL-1 knockdown and DAPT-induced Notch inhibition blocks tumor progression
DCAMKL-1 mediated regulation of let-7a miRNA
DCAMKL-1 regulates Notch-1 via a miR-144 dependent mechanism
Hairy and Enhancer of Split 1 (HES1) is a transcription factor and target gene of the canonical Notch signaling pathway . It has been confirmed that HES1 is the downstream effector of Notch-1 and Hedgehog signaling pathways and that these pathways are frequently upregulated in tumors . Compounds that inhibit these pathways induce differentiation and apoptosis in cancer cells; several are currently in clinical trials . We observed a significant reduction in HES1 mRNA (Figure 4B) and protein (Figure 4D) in the tumor xenografts treated with NP-siDCAMKL-1, DAPT, and NP-siDCAMKL-1+DAPT compared to control or NP-siSCR treated tumors.
We previously found a predicted binding site for miR-144 in the Notch-1 3' UTR (at the 189th base pair) (http://www.microrna.org: a resource for microRNA targets and expression) (Additional File 2, Figure S2) . To investigate the role of DCAMKL-1 in regulating Notch-1 via miR-144 miRNA in colorectal cancer, HCT116 tumor xenografts were analyzed for pri-miR-144 miRNA expression by real-time RT-PCR. Compared to control and NP-siSCR-treated tumors, there was a 3-fold increase in pri-miR-144 miRNA expression in NP-siDCAMKL-1-treated tumors (Figure 4E). These data suggest that DCAMKL-1 negatively regulates pri-miR-144 miRNA in human colorectal cancer cells. Furthermore, tumors treated with DAPT and NP-siDCAMKL-1+DAPT demonstrated an 8-fold increase in pri-miR-144 miRNA expression compared to control and NP-siSCR-treated tumors.
To evaluate these findings quantitatively, we performed a luciferase reporter gene assay using HCT116 cells containing the firefly luciferase gene with a complementary miR-144 binding site in the 3'UTR. A statistically significant reduction in luciferase activity was observed following DCAMKL-1 knockdown (Figure 4F), indicating that DCAMKL-1 may be a posttranscriptional regulator of miR-144 miRNA downstream targets in colorectal cancer. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that Notch-1 is a downstream target of miR-144 miRNA and that DCAMKL-1 regulates posttranscriptional control of Notch-1.
siRNA-mediated knockdown of DCAMKL-1 inhibits Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition via a miR-200a dependent mechanism
We observed a significant downregulation of Snail and Slug in tumor xenografts treated with NP-siDCAMKL-1, DAPT, and NP-siDCAMKL-1+DAPT compared to control or NP-siSCR treated tumors (Figure 5C). These data taken together suggest that knockdown of DCAMKL-1 may inhibit EMT via a miR-200a-dependent mechanism in human colorectal cancer .
The use of PLGA NPs has emerged as a powerful, potential approach for carrying small and large molecules for therapeutic applications because of PLGA's biodegradability, slow-release of encapsulated payloads and enhanced cellular uptake . PLGA has been approved by the FDA for human use . In this report, we have demonstrated that (a) DCAMKL-1 siRNA encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles (siDCAMKL-1 NPs) exhibit significant knockdown of DCAMKL-1 mRNA in HCT116 cells; (b) siDCAMKL-1 NPs are similarly potent or more than free liposomal encapsulated siDCAMKL-1 in the ability to down-regulate tumorigenesis, pro-proliferative and oncogenic factors such as c-Myc, in tumor xenografts; (c) siDCAMKL-1 NPs are similarly effective in increasing tumor suppressor miRNA let-7a; (d) siDCAMKL-1 NPs are effective in increasing miR-144 and downregulating Notch-1 and (e) siDCAMKL-1 NPs may serve as a useful vehicle for the delivery of anti-cancer therapy via its effects on EMT through its interaction with miR-200a.
In general, NP-mediated delivery has been considered to enhance the bioavailability of an active component such as a drug, while limiting toxicity. Thus, nanoparticle delivery systems are promising tools for treatment of many diseases including cancer [42, 43]. We initially constructed and subsequently characterized PLGA nanoparticles containing siDCAMKL-1 (siDCAMKL-1 NPs) because in PBS at 37°C, they displayed a release profile, characteristic of an initial burst followed by a relatively constant release until day 28 after treatment . This pattern, known as a burst release, is characteristic of hydrophilic drugs encapsulated inside polymeric nanoparticles. The burst release may be explained by the fact that the hydrophilic drug has readily escaped or diffused into the aqueous medium under a concentration gradient. The relatively constant release that follows is primarily due to the hydrolysis of the ester bonds between the individual monomers which results in the degradation of the nanoparticles and hence the sustained release and bioavailability of siDCAMKL-1 NPs .
While chitosan (polysaccharide and a cationic natural polymer) has been used for nucleic acids complexation , here we chose to utilize the poly-cationic polymer poly (ethylenimine) (PEI) primarily due to its physical structure and potential for a high degree of protonation which aids the PEI-siRNA complex in avoiding degradation . Consequently, we rationalized that the introduction of PEI, into the PLGA matrix could improve the retention of anionic siRNA molecules to encapsulate siRNA molecules in nanoparticles rather than to adsorb on the surface. In addition, PEI is a highly branched cationic polymer that has been used successfully to transfect a variety of cells with relatively low cytotoxicity when complexed with DNA, demonstrating transfection efficiencies significantly better than those seen with other transfection techniques [46, 47].
In the efficiency studies comparing siDCAMKL-1 and siDCAMKL-1 NPs, we used equal amounts of free and encapsulated siDCAMKL-1. We calculated the amounts of the encapsulated siDCAMKL-1 to be approximately 7.45 μg siDCAMKL-1 per mg of PLGA NPs. For any amount of free siDCAMKL-1, we used an equal amount of encapsulated siDCAMKL-1 regardless of the amount of the PLGA present. We then, conducted pilot studies to select the most appropriate treatment period of the HCT116 cells with siDCAMKL-1. In these studies, we initially treated the cells for various time periods, ranging from 2 h to 72 h, with various concentrations of siDCAMKL-1 NPs and the equivalent free siDCAMKL-1 concentration. We observed that NP based-siDCAMKL-1 required 7-fold less siRNA to obtain an equivalent downregulation of DCAMKL-1 mRNA.
The Notch signaling pathway is frequently activated in many human cancers [48, 49]. NP-based-DCAMKL-1 knockdown in HCT116 tumor xenografts resulted in a marked decrease in Notch-1 mRNA (50%), which contains a putative predicted binding site for miR-144 in the 3'UTR. miR-144 is a regulator of embryonic alpha-hemoglobin (α-E1), through targeting the 3'-UTR of Krüppel-like factor D gene and positively regulates erythroid differentiation in hematopoietic stem cells . Next we evaluated the expression of miR-144 in HCT116 tumor xenografts treated with NP-siDCAMKL-1. There was a 3-fold increase in miR-144 and a corresponding ~40% reduction in Notch-1 mRNA and protein, which was further confirmed by the luciferase-based reporter assay.
Pharmacological inhibition of Notch using γ-secretase inhibitor has been demonstrated to block tumor development in various cancers including that of the pancreas . In this report, we have confirmed that DAPT-mediated inhibition of Notch resulted in tumor growth arrest. Given the inhibitory effect of NP-siDCAMKL-1 on Notch, we evaluated the effects of DAPT on miR-144. Surprisingly, we observed an 8-fold increase in miR-144 and a reduction in DCAMKL-1 mRNA following treatment of tumor xenografts with DAPT. While the exact mechanism is unknown, we speculate that DAPT may act on DCAMKL-1 directly, resulting in the induction of miR-144. These data taken together suggest that both DAPT and/or NP-siDCAMKL-1 act on similar pathways. Additionally, the Notch-1 downstream effector HES1 mRNA and protein were decreased following treatment of xenografts with NP-siDCAMKL-1. Here for the first time, we report that DCAMKL-1 regulates Notch-1 via a miR-144 dependent mechanism in colorectal cancer.
Recently, inhibition of Notch signaling has been shown to attenuate EMT . In our study, following treatment with DAPT and/or NP-siDCAMKL-1, we observed a reduction in EMT transcription factors Snail, Slug, ZEB1 and ZEB2.
miRNAs have emerged as important developmental regulators and control critical processes such as cell fate determination and cell death . There is increasing evidence that several miRNAs are mutated or poorly expressed in human cancers and may act as tumor suppressors or oncogenes [53, 54]. Here we report that NP-siDCAMKL-1 upregulates miR-200a, let-7a and miR-144 in the colorectal cancer tumor xenograft model. Furthermore, induction of pri-miR-200a resulted in downregulation of ZEB1, ZEB2, Snail and Slug in colorectal tumor xenografts. These data strongly support a direct regulatory role for DCAMKL-1 in cancer via miRNA dependent mechanisms. As recently reported, the induction of EMT in human mammary epithelial cells resulted in a "stem cell-like" phenotype characterized by a CD44high and CD24low cell surface marker expression pattern. Furthermore, these cells formed mammospheres, colonies in soft agar and tumors in nude mice more aggressively than non-EMT induced cells. These studies demonstrate a direct link between the induction of EMT and the gain of stem cell-like properties . These recent findings lend support to our hypothesis that EMT in the stem cell population may play a critical role in tumorigenesis .
Finally, we have shown here that targeting a key regulatory molecule (DCAMKL-1) utilizing NP-based delivery of siRNA results in colorectal cancer tumor xenograft growth arrest through the upregulation of several tumor suppressor miRNAs. Induction of microRNAs that coordinately inhibit critical oncogenic genes could lead to the development of novel anti-cancer therapeutics that attack multiple pathways and processes that are essential for cancer growth, invasion and metastasis in colon and perhaps other cancers.
All cell culture reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). PLGA was purchased from Lakeshore Biomaterials (Birmingham, AL, USA) as a 50:50 monomer ratio with a molecular weight of 58 kDa and inherent viscosity of 0.43 dl/g.
Human colon cancer HCT-116 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and propogated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin in a humidified chamber at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Small interfering RNAs
DCAMKL-1 siRNA (si-DCAMKL-1) sequence targeting the coding region of DCAMKL-1 (accession No. NM_004734) (GGGAGUGAGAACAAUCUACtt) and scrambled siRNAs (si-SCR) not matching any of the human genes were obtained (Ambion Inc, Austin, TX) and transfected using siPORT™ NeoFX™ (Ambion).
Synthesis and characterization of DCAMKL-1 siRNA NPs
where siRNANPs is the amount of siRNA encapsulated inside PLGA NPs, and siRNATot is the total amount of siRNA added.
Human multi-cancer tissue microarrays (Tissue Array Network, Rockville, MD) and tumor xenograft tissues were subjected to immunohistochemical analyses. Heat-Induced Epitope Retrieval was performed on 4 μm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections utilizing a pressurized Decloaking Chamber (Biocare Medical) in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 99°C for 18 min. Brightfield: Slides were incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide at room temperature for 20 min. After incubation with primary antibody [DCAMKL-1 C-terminal (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA) or c-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) or Notch-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies)], the slides were incubated in peroxidase-conjugated EnVision™+ polymer detection kit (DAKO). Slides were developed with diaminobenzidine (Sigma).
Slides were examined utilizing a Nikon 80i microscope and DXM1200C camera for brightfield analysis. Fluorescent images were taken with PlanFluoro objectives, utilizing CoolSnap ES2 camera (Photometrics). Images were captured utilizing NIS-Elements software (Nikon).
Xenograft tumor model
Male athymic nude mice (NCr-nu/nu) were purchased from the National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center (Frederick, MD) and housed in pathogen-free conditions. They were cared for in accordance with guidelines set forth by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps' "Policy on Human Care and Use of Laboratory Animals." All studies were approved and supervised by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. HCT116 cells (6 × 106) were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of 4- to 6-wk-old male athymic nude mice (three mice per group). Tumors were measured using a caliper and the volume was calculated as (length × width2) × 0.5. The tumors reached 1000 mm3 15 days after injection of cells. NPs were reconstituted in sterile normal saline and injected directly into the tumors. DAPT was reconstituted in corn oil, which was injected intraperitoneally. In combination treatments, NPs were injected intratumorally and DAPT was injected i.p, at the same time points. Each animal bearing the tumor was injected on days 15, 18, 21, 24, and 27 with one of the following preparations - 50 μl (5 μM) of siRNA-NP preparation [either NP alone (control), NP-siScrambled (siSCR), or NP-siDCAMKL-1], or 10 mg/kg of DAPT alone, or a combination of NP-siDCAMKL-1 and DAPT. All mice were killed on day 30 .
Real-time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction analyses
Total RNA isolated from tumor xenografts and HCT116 cells was subjected to reverse transcription using Superscript™ II RNase H-Reverse Transcriptase and random hexanucleotide primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The complementary DNA (cDNA) was subsequently used to perform real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by SYBR™ chemistry (SYBR Green I, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for specific transcripts using gene-specific primers and JumpStart™ Taq DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich). The crossing threshold value assessed by real-time PCR was noted for the transcripts and normalized with β-actin messenger RNA (mRNA). The quantitative changes in mRNA were expressed as fold-change relative to control with ± SEM value.
The following primers were used:
β-actin: forward: 5'-GGTGATCCACATCTGCTGGAA-3',
DCAMKL-1: forward: 5'- CAGCAACCAGGAATGTATTGGA -3',
reverse: 5'- ctcaactcggaatcggaagact-3';
ZEB1: forward: 5'-AAGAATTCACAGTGGAGAGAAGCCA-3',
ZEB2: forward: 5'-AGCCGATCATGGCGGATGGC-3',
E-cadherin: forward: 5'-CCTCCCATCAGCTGCCC-3',
Snail: forward: 5'-AAGGCCTTCTCTAGGCCCT-3',
Slug: forward: 5'-TGCTTCAAGGACACATTA-3',
Twist: forward: 5-GTCTGGAGGATGGAGGG-3,
c-Myc: forward: 5'-CACACATCAGCACAACTACGCA-3',
Notch-1: forward: 5'-CGGGTCCACCAGTTTGAATG-3',
Total RNA isolated from tumor xenografts and HCT116 cancer cells was subjected to reverse transcription with Superscript II RNase H-Reverse Transcriptase and random hexanucleotide primers (Invitrogen). The cDNA was subsequently used to perform real-time PCR by SYBR chemistry for pri-let-7a, pri-miR-144, and pri-miR-200a transcripts using specific primers and JumpStart Taq DNA polymerase. The crossing threshold value assessed by real-time PCR was noted for pri-let-7a, pri-miR-144, and pri-miR-200a miRNAs and normalized with U6 pri-miRNA. The changes in pri-miRNAs were expressed as fold-change relative to control with ± SEM values .
The following primers were used:
pri-U6: forward: 5'-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3',
pri-let-7a: forward: 5'-GAGGTAGTAGGTTGTATAGTTTAGAA-3',
pri-miR-144: forward: 5'-GCTGGGATATCATCATATACTG-3',
pri-miR-200a: forward: 5'-TTCCACAGCAGCCCCTG-3',
Western blot analysis
HCT116 cells or tumor xenograft samples treated with siRNA or siRNA-NPs were lysed and the concentration of protein was determined by the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL). Forty μg of the protein was size separated in a 7.5-15% SDS polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane with a semidry transfer apparatus (Amersham-Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). The membrane was blocked in 5% non-fat dry milk for 1 h and probed overnight with rabbit anti-DCAMKL-1 antibody (Abcam Inc) or with rabbit anti-c-Myc, rabbit anti-Notch1 or rabbit anti-HES1 antibody (Cell Signaling Danvers, MA). Actin, used as a loading control was identified using a goat polyclonal IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc). Subsequently, the membrane was incubated with anti-rabbit or anti-goat IgG horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (Amersham-Pharmacia) for 1 h at room temperature. The proteins were detected using ECL™ Western Blotting detection reagents (Amersham-Pharmacia).
Luciferase reporter gene assay
HCT116 cells were transfected with a plasmid containing the firefly luciferase (Photinus pyralis) gene with a complementary let-7a (or miR-114) binding site at its' 3'untranslated region (UTR) obtained from Signosis Inc (Sunnyvale, CA). The cells were also co-transfected with the Renilla luciferase expressing plasmid pRL-TK (Promega) as an internal control. Following transfection, the cells were treated with NPs alone, NP-siSCR, or NP-siDCAMKL-1 and subjected to luciferase activity measurement. Luciferase activity was determined as per the manufacturer's instructions (Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System; Promega) using a Biotek Synergy III multi plate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT) as described previously . The activity, normalized to Renilla luciferase activity, is presented as relative luciferase units relative to control with ± SEM values. Assays were performed in triplicate wells and experiments were repeated three times.
All experiments were performed in triplicate. Results are reported as average ± SEM unless otherwise indicated. Data were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.01.
Acknowledgements and funding
This work was supported by NIH and National Cancer Institute (NCI) grants: NIH DK-065887, DK-002822, DK-085508; CA-137482 (CWH); Veterans Affairs (CWH); Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology, and Oklahoma Center for Adult Stem Cell Research (CWH). This was partly funded by NIH grant 3R44AT004118-03S1 (RPR).
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009, 59: 225-249. 10.3322/caac.20006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Potten CS, Booth C, Hargreaves D: The small intestine as a model for evaluating adult tissue stem cell drug targets. Cell Prolif. 2003, 36: 115-129. 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2003.00264.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sureban SM, May R, George RJ, Dieckgraefe BK, McLeod HL, Ramalingam S, Bishnupur KS, Natarajan G, Anant S, Houchen CW: Knockdown of RNA binding protein musashi-1 leads to tumor regression in vivo. Gastroenterology. 2008, 134: 1448-1458. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okano H, Imai T, Okabe M: Musashi: a translational regulator of cell fate. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 1355-1359.Google Scholar
- May R, Riehl TE, Hunt C, Sureban SM, Anant S, Houchen CW: Identification of a novel putative gastrointestinal stem cell and adenoma stem cell marker, doublecortin and CaM kinase-like-1, following radiation injury and in adenomatous polyposis coli/multiple intestinal neoplasia mice. Stem Cells. 2008, 26: 630-637. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0621.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- May R, Sureban SM, Hoang N, Riehl TE, Lightfoot SA, Ramanujam R, Wyche JH, Anant S, Houchen CW: Doublecortin and CaM kinase-like-1 and leucine-rich-repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor mark quiescent and cycling intestinal stem cells, respectively. Stem Cells. 2009, 27: 2571-2579. 10.1002/stem.193.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- May R, Sureban SM, Lightfoot SA, Hoskins AB, Brackett DJ, Postier RG, Ramanujam R, Rao CV, Wyche JH, Anant S, Houchen CW: Identification of a novel putative pancreatic stem/progenitor cell marker DCAMKL-1 in normal mouse pancreas. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010, 299: G303-310. 10.1152/ajpgi.00146.2010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sureban SM, May R, Lightfoot SA, Hoskins AB, Lerner M, Brackett DJ, Postier RG, Ramanujam R, Mohammed A, Rao CV: DCAMKL-1 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human pancreatic cells through a miR-200a-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 2011, 71: 2328-2338. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2738.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sureban SM, May R, Ramalingam S, Subramaniam D, Natarajan G, Anant S, Houchen CW: Selective blockade of DCAMKL-1 results in tumor growth arrest by a Let-7a MicroRNA-dependent mechanism. Gastroenterology. 2009, 137: 649-659. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.004. 659 e1-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang C, Li M, Chen C, Yao Q: Small interfering RNA therapy in cancer: mechanism, potential targets, and clinical applications. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2008, 12: 637-645. 10.1517/14728220.127.116.117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh SK: RNA interference and its therapeutic potential against HIV infection. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008, 8: 449-461. 10.1517/14712518.104.22.1689.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie FY, Woodle MC, Lu PY: Harnessing in vivo siRNA delivery for drug discovery and therapeutic development. Drug Discov Today. 2006, 11: 67-73. 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03668-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Fougerolles AR: Delivery vehicles for small interfering RNA in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 2008, 19: 125-132. 10.1089/hum.2008.928.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akhtar S, Benter IF: Nonviral delivery of synthetic siRNAs in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 3623-3632. 10.1172/JCI33494.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park J, Fong PM, Lu J, Russell KS, Booth CJ, Saltzman WM, Fahmy TM: PEGylated PLGA nanoparticles for the improved delivery of doxorubicin. Nanomedicine. 2009, 5: 410-418. 10.1016/j.nano.2009.02.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Langer R, Folkman J: Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules. Nature. 1976, 263: 797-800. 10.1038/263797a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Visscher GE, Robison RL, Maulding HV, Fong JW, Pearson JE, Argentieri GJ: Biodegradation of and tissue reaction to 50:50 poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microcapsules. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985, 19: 349-365. 10.1002/jbm.820190315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shive MS, Anderson JM: Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1997, 28: 5-24. 10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00048-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jain RA: The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices. Biomaterials. 2000, 21: 2475-2490. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00115-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lathia JD, Leodore L, Wheatley MA: Polymeric contrast agent with targeting potential. Ultrasonics. 2004, 42: 763-768. 10.1016/j.ultras.2003.12.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park YJ, Nah SH, Lee JY, Jeong JM, Chung JK, Lee MC, Yang VC, Lee SJ: Surface-modified poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres for targeted bone imaging with enhanced labeling and delivery of radioisotope. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003, 67: 751-760.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mondalek FG, Ashley RA, Roth CC, Kibar Y, Shakir N, Ihnat MA, Fung KM, Grady BP, Kropp BP, Lin HK: Enhanced angiogenesis of modified porcine small intestinal submucosa with hyaluronic acid-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles: From fabrication to preclinical validation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010Google Scholar
- Sureban SM, Ramalingam S, Natarajan G, May R, Subramaniam D, Bishnupuri KS, Morrison AR, Dieckgraefe BK, Brackett DJ, Postier RG: Translation regulatory factor RBM3 is a proto-oncogene that prevents mitotic catastrophe. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 4544-4556. 10.1038/onc.2008.97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leethanakul C, Patel V, Gillespie J, Pallente M, Ensley JF, Koontongkaew S, Liotta LA, Emmert-Buck M, Gutkind JS: Distinct pattern of expression of differentiation and growth-related genes in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck revealed by the use of laser capture microdissection and cDNA arrays. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 3220-3224. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203703.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rae FK, Stephenson SA, Nicol DL, Clements JA: Novel association of a diverse range of genes with renal cell carcinoma as identified by differential display. Int J Cancer. 2000, 88: 726-732. 10.1002/1097-0215(20001201)88:5<726::AID-IJC7>3.0.CO;2-H.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tohda S, Nara N: Expression of Notch1 and Jagged1 proteins in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001, 42: 467-472. 10.3109/10428190109064603.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Zhang Y, Li Y, Banerjee S, Liao J, Sarkar FH: Down-regulation of Notch-1 contributes to cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006, 5: 483-493.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miyamoto Y, Maitra A, Ghosh B, Zechner U, Argani P, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Sriuranpong V, Iso T, Meszoely IM, Wolfe MS: Notch mediates TGF alpha-induced changes in epithelial differentiation during pancreatic tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 565-576. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00140-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fan X, Matsui W, Khaki L, Stearns D, Chun J, Li YM, Eberhart CG: Notch pathway inhibition depletes stem-like cells and blocks engraftment in embryonal brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 7445-7452. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0858.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katoh M: Notch signaling in gastrointestinal tract (review). Int J Oncol. 2007, 30: 247-251.Google Scholar
- Schreck KC, Taylor P, Marchionni L, Gopalakrishnan V, Bar EE, Gaiano N, Eberhart CG: The Notch target Hes1 directly modulates Gli1 expression and Hedgehog signaling: a potential mechanism of therapeutic resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16: 6060-6070. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1624.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sang L, Roberts JM, Coller HA: Hijacking HES1: how tumors co-opt the anti-differentiation strategies of quiescent cells. Trends Mol Med. 2010, 16: 17-26. 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.11.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turley EA, Veiseh M, Radisky DC, Bissell MJ: Mechanisms of disease: epithelial-mesenchymal transition--does cellular plasticity fuel neoplastic progression?. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008, 5: 280-290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poste G, Greig R: On the genesis and regulation of cellular heterogeneity in malignant tumors. Invasion Metastasis. 1982, 2: 137-176.Google Scholar
- Diehn M, Clarke MF: Cancer stem cells and radiotherapy: new insights into tumor radioresistance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98: 1755-1757. 10.1093/jnci/djj505.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Polakis P: Wnt signaling and cancer. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 1837-1851.Google Scholar
- Zhang H, Li Y, Lai M: The microRNA network and tumor metastasis. Oncogene. 2010, 29: 937-948. 10.1038/onc.2009.406.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xia H, Ng SS, Jiang S, Cheung WK, Sze J, Bian XW, Kung HF, Lin MC: miR-200a-mediated downregulation of ZEB2 and CTNNB1 differentially inhibits nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell growth, migration and invasion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010, 391: 535-541. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.11.093.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y: The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 14910-14914. 10.1074/jbc.C800074200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Herrero-Vanrell R, Ramirez L, Fernandez-Carballido A, Refojo MF: Biodegradable PLGA microspheres loaded with ganciclovir for intraocular administration. Encapsulation technique, in vitro release profiles, and sterilization process. Pharm Res. 2000, 17: 1323-1328. 10.1023/A:1026464124412.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garinot M, Fievez V, Pourcelle V, Stoffelbach F, des Rieux A, Plapied L, Theate I, Freichels H, Jerome C, Marchand-Brynaert J: PEGylated PLGA-based nanoparticles targeting M cells for oral vaccination. J Control Release. 2007, 120: 195-204. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.04.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Wang W, Chen Y, Huang K, Shuai X, Chen Q, Li X, Lian G: The investigation of polymer-siRNA nanoparticle for gene therapy of gastric cancer in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010, 5: 129-136.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan JM, Valencia PM, Zhang L, Langer R, Farokhzad OC: Polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Methods Mol Biol. 2010, 624: 163-175. 10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mondalek FG, Ponnurangam S, Govind J, Houchen C, Anant S, Pantazis P, Ramanujam RP: Inhibition of angiogenesis- and inflammation-inducing factors in human colon cancer cells in vitro and in ovo by free and nanoparticle-encapsulated redox dye, DCPIP. J Nanobiotechnology. 2010, 8: 17-10.1186/1477-3155-8-17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang IJ, Jhuang MC, Chen YH, Yeh LK, Liu CY, Young TH: Chitosan modification of adenovirus to modify transfection efficiency in bovine corneal epithelial cells. PLoS one. 2010, 5: e12085-10.1371/journal.pone.0012085.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Godbey WT, Wu KK, Mikos AG: Size matters: molecular weight affects the efficiency of poly(ethylenimine) as a gene delivery vehicle. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999, 45: 268-275. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990605)45:3<268::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-Q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patil Y, Panyam J: Polymeric nanoparticles for siRNA delivery and gene silencing. Int Journal Pharm. 2009, 367: 195-203. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.09.039.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plentz R, Park JS, Rhim AD, Abravanel D, Hezel AF, Sharma SV, Gurumurthy S, Deshpande V, Kenific C, Settleman J: Inhibition of gamma-secretase activity inhibits tumor progression in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2009, 136: 1741-1749. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.008. e1746View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koch U, Radtke F: Notch and cancer: a double-edged sword. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007, 64: 2746-2762. 10.1007/s00018-007-7164-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Charafe-Jauffret E, Ginestier C, Birnbaum D: Breast cancer stem cells: tools and models to rely on. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 202-10.1186/1471-2407-9-202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Saad S, Stanners SR, Yong R, Tang O, Pollock CA: Notch mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transformation is associated with increased expression of the Snail transcription factor. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010, 42: 1115-1122. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.03.016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004, 116: 281-297. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McManus MT: MicroRNAs and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2003, 13: 253-258. 10.1016/S1044-579X(03)00038-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S, Osada H, Endoh H, Harano T, Yatabe Y, Nagino M, Nimura Y: Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 3753-3756. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0637.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mani SA, Guo W, Liao MJ, Eaton EN, Ayyanan A, Zhou AY, Brooks M, Reinhard F, Zhang CC, Shipitsin M: The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008, 133: 704-715. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Astete CE, Sabliov CM: Synthesis and characterization of PLGA nanoparticles. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006, 17: 247-289. 10.1163/156856206775997322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.