- Open Access
Light triggered detection of aminophenyl phosphate with a quantum dot based enzyme electrode
© Khalid et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 18 August 2011
- Accepted: 7 October 2011
- Published: 7 October 2011
An electrochemical sensor for p-aminophenyl phosphate (p APP) is reported. It is based on the electrochemical conversion of 4-aminophenol (4AP) at a quantum dot (QD) modified electrode under illumination. Without illumination no electron transfer and thus no oxidation of 4AP can occur. p APP as substrate is converted by the enzyme alkaline phosphatase (ALP) to generate 4AP as a product. The QDs are coupled via 1,4-benzenedithiol (BDT) linkage to the surface of a gold electrode and thus allow potential-controlled photocurrent generation. The photocurrent is modified by the enzyme reaction providing access to the substrate detection. In order to develop a photobioelectrochemical sensor the enzyme is immobilized on top of the photo-switchable layer of the QDs. Immobilization of ALP is required for the potential possibility of spatially resolved measurements. Geometries with immobilized ALP are compared versus having the ALP in solution. Data indicate that functional immobilization with layer-by-layer assembly is possible. Enzymatic activity of ALP and thus the photocurrent can be described by Michaelis- Menten kinetics. p APP is detected as proof of principle investigation within the range of 25 μM - 1 mM.
- Gold Electrode
- Exciton Peak
- Photocurrent Response
- Phenyl Phosphate
- Polyelectrolyte Layer
Colloidal quantum dots (QDs), which are fluorescent semiconductor nanoparticles, have recently brought impact to various disciplines, as has been highlighted in various review articles [1–5]. QDs have been recently discussed also as new building blocks for the construction of electrochemical sensors [6–12]. Upon optical illumination (below the wavelength of the first exciton peak QDs have a a continuous absorption spectrum, with a local maximum at the exciton peak ) electron hole pairs are generated inside QDs. Due to these charge carriers electrons can be transferred to or from the QDs. QDs thus can be oxidized/reduced and can serve as light-controlled redox active element and can be integrated in electrochemical signal chains [9, 14–16]. The key advantage hereby is that the redox reaction of the QD surface can be virtually switched on and off by light. QD have been also used as elements of signal transduction of enzymatic reactions [17, 18].
In the present work we wanted to apply QDs as light-controlled redox active element for the enzymatic detection of p-aminophenyl phosphate (p APP) with alkaline phosphatase (ALP). ALP is a widely used enzyme in bioanalysis as it has a high turnover rate and broad substrate specificity . The enzyme is particularly interesting as label for immunoassays [20, 21]. Very sensitive substrate recycling schemes have been also reported [22, 23]. Four different groups of substrates are known for ALP: i) ß-glycerophosphate and hexose phosphate [24–26], ii) phenyl phosphate [27, 28] and ß-naphthyl phosphate , iii) p-nitrophenyl phosphate  and phenolphthalein diphosphate [31, 32], 4-methyl-umbellipheryl phosphate  and p-aminophenyl phosphate (p APP) , and iv) phosphoenol pyruvate . Electrochemical detection has been reported for a number of ALP substrates [36, 37], in particular for phenyl phosphate. However, p APP is claimed to be a better substrate for ALP than phenyl phosphate, as its product 4-aminophenol (4AP) is more easily oxidizable than phenol, which is the product of phenyl phosphate, as it does not foul the electrode even at higher concentrations, and as it has a rather reversible electrochemical behavior . For this reason we chose p APP as substrate in the present study. Readout of the enzymatic reaction was performed with the QD-modified electrode . We hereby put particular interest in the way of immobilization of ALP on the electrode. In previous work the enzymes were suspended in the solution above the sensor electrode [6, 9]. Here we go a step further and directly immobilize the enzyme on the QD-modified electrode. This was done in order to investigate whether a specific enzymatic reaction can be coupled with a photoinitiated reaction at a QD modified electrode in a way that the recognition element is integrated with the transducer. The potential advantage of light-triggered detection would be the possibility of spatially resolved detection [38–41]. Only at the illuminated parts of the electrode a photocurrent signal is induced. By having different enzymes immobilized at different regions of the electrode they could be selectively addressed by illumination. Thus, two key elements of this study are the following. First, instead of using enzymes in solution as in previous studies we demonstrate that enzymatic reactions can also be followed when enzymes are immobilized on the sensor surface, which is a requirement for potential spatially resolved analysis. Second, we investigate how the way of immobilization influences the sensing properties.
Materials: CdS QDs were grown via thermal decomposition of precursors under the presence of organic surfactant molecules following published procedures . 1,4-benzenedithiol (BDT) was purchased from TCI Europe, Belgium. Chloroform, toluene, methanol, acetone, ethanol, sodium sulfide (nanohydrate), alkaline phosphatase (from bovine intestinal mucosa type VII S), 4-nitrophenyl phosphate disodium hexahydrate, 4-aminophenol (4AP), phosphate buffer, sodium poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS, Mw = 56,000), poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, Mw = 70,000), and potassium ferri/ferro cyanide were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. All aqueous solutions were prepared using 18 MΩ ultra purified water. The electrochemical measurement cells and electronics have been described in a previous publication  and comprised a home built potentiostat, an Ag/AgCl reference electrode (#MF 2078 RE-6 from BASi, UK), and a lock-in amplifier (EG&G Princeton Applied Research model # 5210). Illumination was done with a xenon lamp (PTI model A-1010 arc lamp housing, UXL-75XE Xenon Lamp from USHIO, powered by PTI LPS-220) modulated by an optical chopper (Scitec instruments).
Confirmation of QDs immobilization: Immobilization of CdS QDs on top of the Au electrodes was performed with current measurements. CVs were recorded before and after immobilization of BDT and QDs on top of gold electrodes with Fe3+/Fe2+ as redox couple in solution . While on bare gold electrodes the typical oxidation and reduction currents could be observed these were not visible in the case of gold electrodes coated with BDT and QDs (see Additional File 1 for data). Alternatively current at fixed bias voltage was recorded for gold electrodes before and after immobilization of BDT and QDs, while illumination was switched on and off. In the case of QDs present on top of the Au electrode a photocurrent could be measured under illumination (date are shown in Additional File 1)
The actual sensor electrode was composed out of QDs which were coupled via a 1,4-benzenedithiol (BDT) layer on top of a gold film electrode. A bias voltage U = +200 mV was applied and the corresponding current I was recorded. Upon illumination of the QDs, electron-hole pairs were generated. Electron transfer could take place in between CdS QDs and the 4AP/QI - redox couple in solution and in between the QDs and the electrode. Thus, the QDs could be used as a light-triggered interlayer to transfer electrons from the redox couple, present in solution to the electrode. The energetical situation of the electron transfer pathway is depicted in Figure 1b/c. 4AP could be only oxidized to 4QI if the two released electrons could be transferred to an energetically lower level. In case the bias U applied to a gold electrode was not positive enough (i.e. its Fermi level was above the energy of the 4AP/4QI redox couple), no oxidation of 4AP could occur (cfg. Figure 1b). However, if at the same bias illuminated QDs were used oxidation of 4AP was possible (cfg. Figure 1c). Upon illumination, electrons in the QDs were excited from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), resulting in electrons (e-) and holes (h+). The holes were trapped in defect states (DS)  at the surface of the QDs. 4AP could now be oxidized to 4QI upon transferring the electrons to the QDs where they recombined with the holes. In turn, electrons were transferred from the CB of the QDs to the gold electrode, thus creating an oxidation current I.
Oxidation currents for the different geometries
ΔImax [nA] direct detection of 4AP
ΔImax [nA] direct detection of p APP
ΔImax [nA] enzymatic reaction
Detection of p-aminophenyl phosphate: As an experimental complication it has to be pointed out that p APP has limited stability, since p APP decomposes slowly in alkaline solution . In order to be sure to test the enzyme activity on the CdS electrode, p APP has also been investigated with the 3 different geometries given in Figure 2 (without the enzyme). Only a very small response of about 1-2 nA was obtained (cfg. Table 1 and Additional File 1). This is an order of magnitude lower than the response to 4AP and ensured specific detection of the substrate p APP by the enzymatic conversion as will be shown in the following. In a first step, the enzymatic reaction of ALP with p APP causing the production of 4AP was investigated with the enzyme in solution. As has been shown above this is possible, as there is response of the photocurrent to the product 4AP, but barely to the substrate p APP. As shown in Figure 5 a-c the enzymatic reaction could be detected for all the 3 geometries in which the enzyme was free in solution, as indicated in Figure 2. However, there were significant differences in the response curves. In contrast to the detection of 4AP alone (geometry S0) the response in geometry S2 for p APP in the conversion with ALP is small, probably due to a depletion of the substrate near the electrode because of electrostatic repulsion.
In literature KM values of 0.48 mM  and 0.056 mM  have been reported, which are in the same order of magnitude as the values detected in our work with the enzyme in solution. For the sensor configuration developed (I1) a larger value can be derived from the experiments. It has to be pointed out that in the case of the polyelectrolyte -fixed enzyme the KM value has to be considered as apparent KM value since here the concentration of half maximum conversion rate is influenced by the immobilization . Comparison of the ΔImax values as obtained for direct detection of 4AP (Figure 4) and detection of 4AP after enzymatic degradation of p APP to 4AP shows that both oxidation signals (detected at the same geometry and provided abundance of enzyme) are quite similar. This is in good agreement with the detection principle proposed.
In summary the developed sensor as illustrated in Figure 2d by immobilizing the ALP via the polyelectrolyte PAH, provides the proof of principle for a detection system for the enzyme substrate p APP. The analytical performance with a detection regime within the concentration range from 0.025 to 1 mM is relatively poor, so that the here presented device has to be seen as a proof of principle demonstrator rather than as an applicable sensor.
A light controlled bioelectrochemical sensor for p APP has been demonstrated. By using QDs as interlayer on gold, 4AP could be oxidized and thus detected via a corresponding photocurrent in case the QDs were illuminated. Enzymes could be functionally immobilized on the sensor surface. This provides the basis for future spatially resolved measurements  by selectively illuminating and reading-out only the area of interest of an electrode which is non-structured, but modified with different immobilized enzyme systems. The approach presented here allows for observing enzymatic reactions which yield 4AP as product. We have demonstrated this for the substrate p APP and the enzyme ALP. A crucial point for such measurements is to ensure high local enzyme concentration and specificity for the detection of the enzymatic product. By using a polyelectrolyte layer of PAH, the enzyme ALP could be immobilized on the electrode surface, retaining enzymatic activity. However, polyelectrolyte layers can also hinder diffusion of the molecule to be detected 4AP to the QD surface, thus hindering detection. For this reason permeability of the polyelectrolyte layers has been studied here for the respective molecule.
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, grants PA 794/3-1, LI706/2-1).
- Wang C, Gao X, Su XG: In vitro and in vivo imaging with quantum dots. Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2010, 397: 1397-1415. 10.1007/s00216-010-3481-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pinaud F, Clarke S, Sittner A, Dahan M: Probing cellular events, one quantum dot at a time. Nature Methods. 2010, 7: 275-285. 10.1038/nmeth.1444.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Resch-Genger U, Grabolle M, Cavaliere-Jaricot S, Nitschke R, Nann T: Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat Meth. 2008, 5: 763-10.1038/nmeth.1248.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Ali Z, Amin F, Riedinger A, Parak WJ: In vitro and intracellular sensing by using the photoluminescence of quantum dots. Analytical And Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2010, 397: 935-942. 10.1007/s00216-010-3609-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parak WJ, Pellegrino T, Plank C: Labelling of cells with quantum dots. Nanotechnology. 2005, 16: R5-R25. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/1/002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stoll C, Kudera S, J.Parak W, Lisdat F: Quantum Dots on Gold:Electrodes For Photoswitchable Cytochrome c Electrochemistry. SMALL. 2006, 2: 741-743. 10.1002/smll.200500441.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katz E, Zayats M, Willner I, Lisdat F: Controlling the direction of photocurrents by means of CdS nanoparticles and cytochrome c-mediated biocatalytic cascades. Chemical Communications. 2006, 1395-1397.Google Scholar
- Stoll C, Gehring C, Schubert K, Zanella M, Parak WJ, Lisdata F: Photoelectrochemical signal chain based on quantum dots on gold--Sensitive to superoxide radicals in solution. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 2008, 24: 260-265. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.03.039.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schubert K, Khalid W, Yue Z, Parak WJ, Lisdat F: Quantum-Dot-Modified Electrode in Combination with NADH-Dependent Dehydrogenase Reactions for Substrate Analysis. Langmuir. 2010, 26: 1395-1400. 10.1021/la902499e.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Q, Lu XB, Li J, Yao X, Li JH: Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and electrochemical biosensing of glucose on quantum dots/carbon nanotubes electrodes. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2007, 22: 3203-3209. 10.1016/j.bios.2007.02.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Z, Xu Q, Wang HQ, Yang Q, Yu JH, Zhao YD: Hydrogen peroxide biosensor based on direct electron transfer of horseradish peroxidase with vapor deposited quantum dots. Sensors And Actuators B-Chemical. 2009, 138: 278-282. 10.1016/j.snb.2008.12.040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang LH, Zhu YH, Yang XL, Sun JJ, Li CZ: Self-assembled CNTs/CdS/dehydrogenase hybrid-based amperometric biosensor triggered by photovoltaic effect. Biosensors & Bioelectronics. 2008, 24: 319-323. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.03.043.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bawendi MG, Steigerwald ML, Brus LE: The quantum mechanics of large semiconductor clusters ("quantum dots"). Annu Rev Phys Chem. 1990, 41: 477-496. 10.1146/annurev.pc.41.100190.002401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kucur E, Riegler J, Urban GA, Nann T: Determination of quantum confinement in CdSe nanocrystals by cyclic voltammetry. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2003, 119: 2333-2337. 10.1063/1.1582834.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ehlert O, Tiwari A, Nann T: Quantum confinement of the thermodynamic functions for the formation of electrons and holes in CdSe nanocrystals. Journal Of Applied Physics. 2006, 100:Google Scholar
- Kucur E, Bucking W, Arenz S, Giernoth R, Nann T: Heterogeneous charge transfer of colloidal nanocrystals in ionic liquids. Chemphyschem. 2006, 7: 77-81. 10.1002/cphc.200500284.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niemeyer CM: Functional hybrid devices of proteins and inorganic nanoparticles. ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT. 2003, 42: 5796-5800. 10.1002/anie.200301703.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Willner I, Basnar B, Willner B: Nanoparticle-enzyme hybrid systems for nanobiotechnology. Febs Journal. 2007, 274: 302-309. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05602.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bagel O, Limoges B, Schollhorn B, Degrand C: Subfemtomolar determination of alkaline phosphatase at a disposable screen-printed electrode modified with a perfluorosulfonated ionomer film. Analytical Chemistry. 1997, 69: 4688-4694. 10.1021/ac9704218.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nistor C, Emneus J: An enzyme flow immunoassay using alkaline phosphatase as the label and a tyrosinase biosensor as the label detector. Analytical Communications. 1998, 35: 417-419. 10.1039/a807964a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kreuzer MP, O'Sullivan CK, Guilbault GG: Alkaline phosphatase as a label for immunoassay using amperometric detection with a variety of substrates and an optimal buffer system. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1999, 393: 95-102. 10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00856-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Campas M, Olteanu MG, Marty JL: Enzymatic recycling for signal amplification: Improving microcystin detection with biosensors. Sensors And Actuators B-Chemical. 2008, 129: 263-267. 10.1016/j.snb.2007.08.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wollenberger U, Schubert F, Scheller FW: Biosensor For Sensitive Phosphate Detection. Sensors And Actuators B-Chemical. 1992, 7: 412-415. 10.1016/0925-4005(92)80335-U.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bodansky A: Phosphatase studies II. Determination of serum phosphatase. Factors influencing the accuracy of the determination. Journal Of Biological Chemistry. 1933, 101: 93-104.Google Scholar
- Shinowara GY, Jones LM, Reinhart HL: The estimation of serum inorganic phosphate and " acid" and " alkaline" phosphatase activity. Journal Of Biological Chemistry. 1942, 142: 921-933.Google Scholar
- Tietz NW, Green A: Automated Procedure For Determination Of Phosphorus + Alkaline Phosphatase (Bodansky) In Serum. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1964, 9: 392-&. 10.1016/0009-8981(64)90031-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kind PRN, King EJ: Estimation Of Plasma Phosphatase By Determination Of Hydrolysed Phenol With Amino-Antipyrine. Journal Of Clinical Pathology. 1954, 7: 322-326. 10.1136/jcp.7.4.322.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- King EJ, Armstrong AR: A convenient method for determining serum and bile phosphatase activity. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1934, 31: 376-381.Google Scholar
- Seligman AM, Chauncey HH, Nachlas MM, Manheimer LH, Ravin HA: The Colorimetric Determination Of Phosphatases In Human Serum. Journal Of Biological Chemistry. 1951, 190: 7-15.Google Scholar
- Bessey OA, Lowry OH, Brock MJ: A Method For The Rapid Determination Of Alkaline Phosphatase With 5 Cubic Millimeters Of Serum. Journal Of Biological Chemistry. 1946, 164: 321-329.Google Scholar
- Fischl J, Segal S, Rabiah S: Microdetermination Of Phosphatases Employing Phenolphthalein Diphosphate As Substrate. Clinical Chemistry. 1967, 13: 941-Google Scholar
- Huggins C, Talalay P: Sodium Phenolphthalein Phosphate As A Substrate For Phosphatase Tests. Journal Of Biological Chemistry. 1945, 159: 399-410.Google Scholar
- Fernley HN, Walker PG: Kinetic Behaviour Of Calf-Intestinal Alkaline Phosphatase With 4-Methylumbelliferyl Phosphate. Biochemical Journal. 1965, 97: 95-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang HT, Lunte CE, Halsall HB, Heineman WR: P-Aminophenyl Phosphate - An Improved Substrate For Electrochemical Enzyme-Immunoassay. Analytica Chimica Acta. 1988, 214: 187-195.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fischer F, Siebert G: Optischer Test Zur Bestimmung Der Alkalischen Phosphate Im Serum. Klinische Wochenschrift. 1961, 39: 202-10.1007/BF01482954.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McNeil CJ, Higgins IJ, Bannister JV: Amperometric Determination Of Alkaline-Phosphatase Activity - Application To Enzyme-Immunoassay. Biosensors. 1987, 3: 199-209.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wehmeyer KR, Halsall HB, Heineman WR, Volle CP, Chen IW: Competitive Heterogeneous Enzyme-Immunoassay For Digoxin With Electrochemical Detection. Analytical Chemistry. 1986, 58: 135-139. 10.1021/ac00292a033.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McConnell HM, Owicki JC, Parce JW, Miller DL, Baxter GT, Wada HG, Pitchford S: The Cytosensor Microphysiometer: Biological Applications of Silicon Technology. Science. 1992, 257: 1906-1912. 10.1126/science.1329199.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Licht S, Myung N, Sun Y: A Light Addressable Photoelectrochemical Cyanide Sensor. Analytical Chemistry. 1996, 68: 954-959. 10.1021/ac9507449.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parak WJ, Hofmann UG, Gaub HE, Owicki JC: Lateral Resolution of Light Addressable Potentiometric Sensors: An Experimental and Theoretical Investigation. Sensors and Actuators A. 1997, 63: 47-57. 10.1016/S0924-4247(97)80428-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- George M, Parak WJ, Gerhardt I, Moritz W, Kaesen F, Geiger H, Eisele I, Gaub HE: Investigation of the spatial resolution of the light-addressable potentiometric sensor (LAPS). Sensors and Actuators A. 2000, 83: 149-249.Google Scholar
- Kudera S, Carbone L, Casula MF, Cingolani R, Falqui A, Snoeck E, Parak WJ, Manna L: Selective growth of PbSe on one or both tips of colloidal semiconductor nanorods. Nanoletters. 2005, 5: 445-449.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yue Z, Khalid W, Zanella M, Abbasi AZ, Pfreundt A, Rivera_Gil P, Schubert K, Lisdat F, Parak WJ: Evaluation of quantum dots applied as switchable layer in a light-controlled electrochemical sensor. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 2010, 396: 1095-1103. 10.1007/s00216-009-3347-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Decher G: Fuzzy nanoassemblies: Toward Layered Polymeric Multicomposites. Science. 1997, 277: 1232-1237. 10.1126/science.277.5330.1232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Latner AL, Parsons ME, Skillen AW: Isoelectric Focusing Of Human Liver Alkaline Phosphatase. Biochemical Journal. 1970, 118: 299-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xie Q, Alpers DH: The two isozymes of rat intestinal alkaline phosphatase are products of two distinct genes. Physiological Genomics. 2000, 3: 1-8.Google Scholar
- Wuister SF, Donega CD, Meijerink A: Influence of thiol capping on the exciton luminescence and decay kinetics of CdTe and CdSe quantum. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004, 108: 17393-17397. 10.1021/jp047078c.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Decher G, Schlenoff J: Multilayer Thin Films: Sequential Assembly of Nanocomposite Materials. Wiley VCH, 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lisdat F, Dronov R, Mohwald H, Scheller FW, Kurth DG: Self-assembly of electro-active protein architectures on electrodes for the construction of biomimetic signal chains. Chemical Communications. 2009, 274-283.Google Scholar
- Gil EP, Tang HT, Halsall HB, Heineman WR, Misiego AS: Competitive Heterogeneous Enzyme-Immunoassay For Theophylline By Flow-Injection Analysis With Electrochemical Detection Of Para-Aminophenol. Clinical Chemistry. 1990, 36: 662-665.Google Scholar
- Hommes FA: Integrated Michaelis-Menten Equation. Archives Of Biochemistry And Biophysics. 1962, 96: 28-10.1016/0003-9861(62)90444-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gehring AG, Brewster JD, Irwin PL, Tu SI, Van Houten LJ: 1-Naphthyl phosphate as an enzymatic substrate for enzyme-linked immunomagnetic electrochemistry. Journal Of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 1999, 469: 27-33. 10.1016/S0022-0728(99)00183-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson RQ, Barone GC, Halsall HB, Heineman WR: Comparison Of Methods For Following Alkaline-Phosphatase Catalysis - Spectrophotometric Versus Amperometric Detection. Analytical Biochemistry. 1991, 192: 90-95. 10.1016/0003-2697(91)90190-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neugebauer S, Stoica L, Guschin D, Schuhmann W: Redox-amplified biosensors based on selective modification of nanopore electrode structures with enzymes entrapped within electrodeposition paints. Microchimica Acta. 2008, 163: 33-40. 10.1007/s00604-007-0928-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bauer CG, Eremenko AV, EhrentreichForster E, Bier FF, Makower A, Halsall HB, Heineman WR, Scheller FW: Zeptomole-detecting biosensor for alkaline phosphatase in an electrochemical immunoassay for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Analytical Chemistry. 1996, 68: 2453-2458. 10.1021/ac960218x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frew JE, Foulds NC, Wilshere JM, Forrow NJ, Green MJ: Measurement Of Alkaline-Phosphatase Activity By Electrochemical Detection Of Phosphate-Esters - Application To Amperometric Enzyme-Immunoassay. Journal Of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 1989, 266: 309-316. 10.1016/0022-0728(89)85077-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neumann H, Vanvreed M: An Improved Alkaline Phosphatase Determination With P-Nitrophenyl Phosphate. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1967, 17: 183-187. 10.1016/0009-8981(67)90117-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.