Open Access

Cerium oxide nanoparticles attenuate acute kidney injury induced by intra-abdominal infection in Sprague–Dawley rats

  • Nandini D. P. K. Manne1, 2, 3,
  • Ravikumar Arvapalli1,
  • Niraj Nepal1, 4,
  • Tolou Shokuhfar5,
  • Kevin M. Rice1,
  • Shinichi Asano1 and
  • Eric R. Blough1, 3, 4Email author
Journal of Nanobiotechnology201513:75

Received: 23 July 2015

Accepted: 13 October 2015

Published: 24 October 2015



Intra-abdominal infection or peritonitis is a cause for great concern due to high mortality rates. The prognosis of severe intra-abdominal infection is significantly diminished in the presence of acute kidney injury (AKI) which is often characterized by renal tubular cell death that can lead to renal failure. The purpose of the current study is to examine the therapeutic efficacy of cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles for the treatment of peritonitis-induced AKI by polymicrobial insult.


A one-time administration of CeO2 nanoparticles (0.5 mg/kg) in the absence of antibiotics or other supportive care, attenuated peritonitis-induced tubular dilatation and the loss of brush border in male Sprague–Dawley rats. These improvements in renal structure were accompanied by decreases in serum cystatin-C levels, reduced renal oxidative stress, diminished Stat-3 phosphorylation and an attenuation of caspase-3 cleavage suggesting that the nanoparticle treatment improved renal glomerular filtration rate, diminished renal inflammation and reduced renal apoptosis. Consistent with these data, further analysis demonstrated that the CeO2 nanoparticle treatment diminished peritonitis-induced increases in serum kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), osteopontin, β-2 microglobulin and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) levels. In addition, the nanoparticle attenuated peritonitis-induced hyperglycemia along with increases in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum potassium and sodium.


CeO2 nanoparticles scavenge reactive oxygen species and attenuate polymicrobial insult induced increase in inflammatory mediators and subsequent AKI. Taken together, the data indicate that CeO2 nanoparticles may be useful as an alternative therapeutic agent or in conjunction with standard medical care for the treatment of peritonitis induced acute kidney injury.


Cerium oxide nanoparticles Polymicrobial insult Acute kidney injury Reactive oxygen species Peritonitis


Intra-abdominal infection-induced peritonitis is characterized by an overwhelming immune response in reaction to the presence of infectious agents that can lead to multi-organ failure and death if not properly managed. Acute kidney injury (AKI) induced by polymicrobial insult is a cause of great concern as it increases mortality rates and is also associated with increased financial burden and length of hospital stay [1]. Despite advances in medical science and care, sepsis still baffles the research community due to its complex pathophysiology and rapid progression making current therapeutic interventions ineffective.

Intra-abdominal infection-induced acute renal failure is caused by a multitude of factors that includes components of ischemia–reperfusion injury, hypoperfusion, endothelial dysfunction, coagulation defects, cytokine storm and apoptosis [24]. Most studies to-date point that the single most cause for intra-abdominal infection induced AKI is the development of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) which is mediated by increased oxidative stress [5, 6]. Other studies have shown that intra-abdominal infection causes injury to renal tubular cells by damaging the endothelium that leads to increased permeability [7]. These changes are histologically evident by loss of brush border and increased tubular dilatation [8]. At the cellular level, it is presumed that polymicrobial insult causes tubular cell death by caspase mediated apoptosis [2]. As such therapeutic interventions directed towards elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be warranted for the treatment of AKI.

Recent developments in nanotechnology have given rise to several promising compounds that can effectively scavenge ROS [911]. Among those, CeO2 nanoparticles have been increasingly used in biomedical field for the treatment of various pathologies involving oxidative stress [12, 13] and inflammation [14, 15]. A property that is unique to CeO2 nanoparticles is the ability to cycle between Ce+3 (reduced) and Ce+4 (oxidized) states which allows them to effectively scavenge ROS [16]. Other studies have shown that CeO2 nanoparticles behave as a superoxide dismutase [17] and catalase [18] mimetic depending on the redox state of the particles. Researches have exploited this property of CeO2 nanoparticles for the treatment of diabetes [19, 20], cancer [21, 22] and ischemic stroke [23].

Previously we have shown that CeO2 nanoparticles inhibit intra-abdominal infection induced liver and heart dysfunction [24]. Whether CeO2 nanoparticles can be used to attenuate polymicrobial insult-induced AKI is not known. In continuation with our previous study, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of CeO2 nanoparticles for the treatment of polymicrobial insult-induced AKI by examining the effect of nanoparticle intervention on renal histological damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis and changes in circulating AKI biomarkers.


Characterization of nanoceria

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) was used to demonstrate the ordered structure of nanoparticles while transmission electron microscopy (TEM) demonstrated the size of CeO2 nanoparticles to be in between 10-40 nm (Fig. 1a, b). Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) indicated that the content of cerium and oxygen in the sample to be 80.38 and 16.26 %, respectively (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1

Characterization of CeO2 nanoparticles. a Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), b Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), c Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS)

Cerium oxide nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced renal damage and breakdown of tubular F-actin

Polymicrobial insult-induced AKI was characterized by renal tubular dilatation, loss of brush border and damage to the glomerular capillary network (Fig. 2c, g) which appeared to be attenuated with nanoparticle treatment (Fig. 2d, h). Renal sections of peritonitis induced animals showed marked loss of F-actin in proximal tubular cells (Fig. 3c) which was attenuated with nanoparticle treatment (Fig. 3d). The mean fluorescence intensity for F-actin was higher in peritonitis +CeO2 group by 61 % when compared to peritonitis group alone (Fig. 3e) (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2

CeO2 nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced renal damage. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of kidney sections 18 h after polymicrobial insult. a Control, b CeO2, c Peritonitis, d Peritonitis + CeO2 (200× magnification), e Control, f CeO2, g Peritonitis, h Peritonitis + CeO2 (400× magnification) (n = 4/group)

Fig. 3

CeO2 nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced loss of F-actin. Rhodamine phalloidin staining of F-actin of kidney sections 18 h after polymicrobial insult. a Control, b CeO2, c Peritonitis, d Peritonitis + CeO2 and e Relative fluorescence intensity as a measure of F-actin levels. 200× magnification. *P < 0.05 compared to control group, $ P < 0.05 compared to CeO2 group and # P < 0.05 compared to peritonitis group (n = 3/group)

Cerium oxide nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced oxidative stress, stat-3 activation, cleavage of caspase 3 and serum biomarkers of renal failure

Compared to control and treated animals, the renal sections obtained from animals suffering from peritonitis exhibited increased superoxide levels (Fig. 4c, e; P < 0.05). Similarly, nanoparticle treatment decreased peritonitis induced increases in the ratio of phosphorylated to total levels of Stat-3 (Fig. 5a; P < 0.05) and caspase-3 cleavage (Fig. 5b; P < 0.05) at 18 h. Compared to the control group and treated animals, peritonitis increased the levels of β-2 microglobulin at 3 h and 18 h and the levels of KIM-1, cystatin-C, osteopontin and VEGF-A at 18 h (Table 1; P < 0.05).
Fig. 4

CeO2 nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced increase in renal superoxide levels. Dihydroethidium staining of kidney sections at 18 h after polymicrobial insult. a Control, b CeO2, c Peritonitis, d Peritonitis + CeO2 and e Quantification of superoxide levels in different groups. 200× magnification. *P < 0.05 compared to control group, $ P < 0.05 compared to CeO2 group and # P < 0.05 compared to peritonitis group (n = 4/group)

Fig. 5

CeO2 nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced renal inflammation and apoptosis. a Levels of phosphorylated to total Stat-3. b Relative levels of cleaved caspase-3 and c Relative levels of caspase-3 as determined by immunoblotting. *P < 0.05 compared to control group, $ P < 0.05 compared to CeO2 group and # P < 0.05 compared to peritonitis group (n = 5–6/group)

Table 1

CeO2 nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced increase in biomarkers of AKI


Sham control 3 h

CeO2 3 h

Peritonitis 3 h

Peritonitis + CeO2 3 h

Sham control 18 h

CeO2 18 h

Peritonitis 18 h

Peritonitis + CeO2 18 h

β2-Microglobulin (µg/mL)

54.00 ± 3.00

49.67 ± 2.40

76.00 ± 1.53*$

77.33 ± 1.76*$

52.00 ± 3.51

32.67 ± 1.45*

128.00 ± 5.85*$

78.33 ± 7.21*$#

Cystatin-C (ng/mL)

578.67 ± 14.25

633.00 ± 30.57

686.00 ± 14.47

690.33 ± 42.10

699.67 ± 52.67

555.33 ± 41.63

1890.00 ± 62.45*$

1093.33 ± 37.56*$#

KIM-1 (ng/mL)

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

3.27 ± 0.13

2.50 ± 0.10#

Osteopontin (ng/mL)

10.80 ± 1.20

11.00 ± 0.58

11.00 ± 0.58

12.33 ± 0.33

9.70 ± 0.00

7.93 ± 0.23*

72.33 ± 4.84*$

36.33 ± 1.76*$#

VEGF-A (pg/mL)

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

Below LLOQ

459.00 ± 12.70

296.67 ± 31.33#

LLOQ lower limit of quantitation

*P < 0.05 compared to control group, $ P < 0.05 compared to CeO2 group and # P < 0.05 compared to peritonitis group (n = 6/group)

Cerium oxide nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis induced changes in serum biochemical parameters

Peritonitis caused a decrease in serum levels of sodium at 3 h and an increase in levels of potassium at 18 h (Table 2; P < 0.05). Nanoparticle treatment attenuated peritonitis-induced changes in serum sodium and potassium (Table 2; P < 0.05). Similarly, peritonitis induced early hyperglycemia and increases in levels of BUN at 3 h time point were attenuated with nanoparticles treatment (Table 2; P < 0.05).
Table 2

CeO2 nanoparticles attenuate peritonitis insult induced alterations in serum biochemical parameters


Sham control 3 h

CeO2 3 h

Peritonitis 3 h

Peritonitis + CeO2 3 h

Sham control 18 h

CeO2 18 h

Peritonitis 18 h

Peritonitis + CeO2 18 h

Glucose (mg/dL)

284.00 ± 8.11

262.29 ± 10.13

426.88 ± 19.74*$

308.57 ± 22.58#

245.33 ± 13.25

290.63 ± 17.16*

105.50 ± 8.53*$

125.25 ± 5.06*$

Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL)

22.00 ± 1.10

21.00 ± 1.00

29.88 ± 1.97*$

24.71 ± 1.17#

19.17 ± 0.54

18.50 ± 0.89

71.30 ± 7.20*$

57.37 ± 3.09$

Sodium (mmol/L)

142.43 ± 0.72

142.86 ± 0.88

136.75 ± 1.36*$

140.14 ± 0.51#

142.00 ± 1.21

141.63 ± 0.91

138.80 ± 0.84

140.63 ± 0.50

Potassium (mmol/L)

5.91 ± 0.37

5.44 ± 0.11

6.36 ± 0.27

6.30 ± 0.23

5.62 ± 0.24

5.75 ± 0.33

7.83 ± 0.24*$

7.06 ± 0.21*$#

*P < 0.05 compared to control group, $ P < 0.05 compared to CeO2 group and # P < 0.05 compared to peritonitis group (n = 6/group)


Intra-abdominal infection or peritonitis-induced AKI has a poor prognosis despite recent advances in medical care. Studies have shown that peritonitis-induced AKI is associated with increases in oxidative and nitrosative stress which promote renal inflammation, tubular dilatation, vacuolization, sloughing of epithelial cells and loss of brush border which if severe can cause renal failure [25, 26]. CeO2 nanoparticles have been shown to act as an anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory agent in the treatment of several diseases including cancer and diabetes [27, 28]. Similarly, previous work by our laboratory has showed that CeO2 nanoparticles can attenuate intra-abdominal infection-induced animal death along with liver and heart damage [24]. With this in mind, we hypothesized that CeO2 nanoparticles could be used to prevent peritonitis induced AKI.

Previous studies have shown that peritonitis induced by polymicrobial insult leads to marked tubular damage along with loss of brush border and derangement in glomerular capillary network [29]. We found that the CeO2 nanoparticle treatment attenuated peritonitis-induced damage to the renal glomeruli and tubules (Fig. 1). AKI is characterized by the loss of F-actin that leads to disruption in cytoskeleton network and impairs renal structural and functional integrity [30]. To address this possibility, we next sought to determine whether the nanoparticles can prevent peritonitis-induced changes in renal structural integrity. As expected we found that peritonitis caused a significant decrease F-actin associated fluorescence which appeared to be attenuated with CeO2 nanoparticle treatment (Fig. 3). Taken together, these data suggest that the nanoparticle treatment was associated with diminished AKI.

It is thought that peritonitis is characterized by increases in oxidative stress which can result in an uncontrolled systemic inflammatory response and multi-organ failure [31]. Studies have shown that CeO2 nanoparticles are potent ROS scavengers and that they can act as catalase and SOD mimetics [32]. Supporting these data, we found that CeO2 nanoparticle treatment significantly attenuated peritonitis induced-increases in renal superoxide oxide levels (Fig. 4). To extend these findings, we next examined the phosphorylation (activation) of the inflammatory mediated Jak-Stat proteins [33]. The Jak-Stat pathway has been shown to participate in the development of diabetic nephropathy, renal fibrosis and ischemia reperfusion injury where it functions as a key regulator of cytokine and growth factor signaling [34]. Additional data has also demonstrated that Stat-3 signaling is necessary for the hypoxia-induced transcription of VEGF [35]. Here we found that peritonitis-induced the activation of Stat-3 and increased serum VEGF levels. (Fig. 5a; Table 1). Similarly, a growing body of evidence suggests that the apoptosis of renal tubular cells is one of the major causes for AKI in peritonitis induced by polymicrobial insult [36]. Other work has demonstrated that the cleavage of caspase-3 activates gelsolin which has F-actin severing properties [37]. The loss of F-actin in turn, causes cytoskeletal derangement that can result in apoptotic cell death [30]. In agreement with our fluorescent measurement of actin levels, we found that peritonitis induced-cleavage of caspase-3 was significantly attenuated by CeO2 nanoparticle treatment (Figs. 3, 5a). Taken together and consistent with our histological findings of diminished renal damage, these data suggest that nanoparticle treatment is associated with decreased renal superoxide levels, reduced renal inflammation, and diminished renal apoptosis.

In addition to changes in cellular structure, AKI has also been shown to be associated with decreases in glomerular filtration rate and alterations in serum KIM-1, β-2 microglobulin, and osteopontin levels [3840]. As expected, peritonitis was associated with alterations in the serum level of all of these variables which appeared to be significantly diminished with nanoparticle treatment (Table 1). In a similar fashion, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, hyperglycemia, and increased blood urea nitrogen levels are generally found in acute renal failure with decreased renal tubular flow rate [8, 41]. Consistent with these findings, we found similar changes in the present study, and importantly, demonstrated a reduction in these variables with nanoparticle treatment (Table 2).


The results of the current study suggest that a single, “stand-alone” dose of CeO2 nanoparticles confers protection against severe polymicrobial insult-induced acute kidney injury. Our data suggest that the CeO2 nanoparticles act by scavenging reactive oxygen species which is associated with diminished caspase-3 activation, reduced loss of F-actin and less damage to the tubules. Improvements in kidney structure were accompanied by evidence of increased renal function and decreased serum biomarker levels of renal injury (Fig. 6). Taken together, these data suggest that further investigation into the potential utility of using CeO2 nanoparticles for the treatment of polymicrobial-induced AKI may be warranted.
Fig. 6

Schematic representation of mechanism of action of CeO2 nanoparticles on polymicrobial insult induced AKI


Characterization of CeO2 nanoparticles

CeO2 nanoparticles were commercially purchased from US Research Nanomaterials Inc. (Houston, TX, USA). Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images were obtained by using Aberration Corrected Analytical Electron Microscope (TEM/STEM JEOL JEM-ARM200CF, Japan) operated at 200 keV. Particle size was obtained using JEOL JEM-2010 transmission electron microscope (TEM). Sample purity was estimated by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy using Noran Voyager EDX software.

Polymicrobial insult and CeO2 nanoparticle treatment

Male Sprague–Dawley rats aged 10 weeks were purchased from Hill-Top laboratories and allowed to acclimatize for 2 weeks prior to experimentation. All surgical procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines provided by Marshall University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). Briefly, animals were anesthetized under isoflurane and a small mid ventral incision of 0.5 cm was made. Sham controls and CeO2 only groups were injected with 5 ml/kg of 5 % sterile dextrose solution intra-peritoneally (i.p) while peritonitis and peritonitis +CeO2 groups received cecal inoculum of 600 mg/kg BW in 5 ml/kg BW of 5 % sterile dextrose solution i.p as described previously [42]. Cecal material was obtained from healthy donor rats. The sham control and peritonitis groups were injected with 200 µl of sterile distilled water intravenously while the CeO2 and peritonitis +CeO2 groups received CeO2 nanoparticles (0.5 mg/kg) in 200 µl of sterile distilled water via tail vein injection.

Tissue collection

Animals were humanely sacrificed under anesthesia and the kidneys were excised, capsule removed and washed in Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer (KRB) to remove any blood. Kidneys were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analysis. Serum was obtained from whole blood by centrifugation at 5000×g for 10 min at room temperature and stored at −80 °C.

Renal histology and staining for F-actin

Frozen kidneys were sectioned (4 µm) with a Leica CM1950 cryostat and transferred to poly-l-lysine coated slides. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed using Histoperfect kit (BBC Biochemical, Seattle WA, USA) to assess kidney morphology and imaged using Evos XL microscope (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA).

Renal sections were stained for F-actin using rhodamine phalloidin (Life technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Briefly, frozen sections were washed with PBS and fixed in 4 % methanol free formaldehyde for 10 min and washed with PBS (3 × 5 min). Sections were then permeabilized with 0.3 % Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min and washed with PBS (3 × 5 min). After blocking with 1 % BSA for 30 min, the tissue sections were incubated with 0.165 µM rhodamine phalloidin for 20 min in the dark, washed with PBS (3 × 5 min), cover slipped and then imaged with a Evos FL microscope (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Four images per section from at least three different animals from each group were evaluated for fluorescence intensity using Image J analysis software.

Estimation of renal superoxide levels

Superoxide levels in renal sections were estimated using dihydroethidium staining as described previously [43]. Briefly, sections were washed with PBS and incubated with 5 mM dihydroethidium for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. After washing with PBS (3 × 5 min), sections were imaged with an Evos FL microscope (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). Four images per section from at least four different animals from each group were evaluated for fluorescence intensity using Image J analysis software.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting

Approximately 100 mg of frozen kidney was taken and pulverized to a fine powder, suspended in 900 µl of T-PER (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) containing 1 % protease and phosphatase inhibitors and homogenized. Supernants were collected by centrifugation (10,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C and the protein concentration determined using the 660 nm assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Samples were equally diluted with 4× Laemilli buffer and then subjected to electrophoresis on 10 % PAGEr Gold Precast gel (Lonza, Rockland, ME, USA) before transfer to nitrocellulose membranes as detailed elsewhere [44]. Equal loading of protein was verified by Ponceau S staining of nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5 % milk in TBST for 1 h and later probed with primary antibodies against p-stat-3 (Tyr 705), stat-3, cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). After exposure to the primary antibodies, membranes were washed with TBST (3 × 5 min) and incubated with secondary anti-rabbit (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactivity was visualized using Supersignal West Pico Chemiluminiscent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) and quantified by Fluorchem 9900 software (Protein Simple, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Multiplex immunoassay and serum biochemical analysis

Serum samples from different animals in each group were pooled and sent to Myriad RBM (Austin, TX, USA) for the analysis of KIM-1, cystatin-C, osteopontin, β-2 microglobulin and VEGF-A using the rodent kidney MAP. Samples were run in triplicate for statistical analysis. The amount of glucose, BUN, sodium and potassium were determined in serum using an Abaxis VetScan® analyzer (Abaxis, Union City, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Results are presented in the form of mean ± standard error of mean. Differences in dependent variables across groups were determined by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Student Newman Keul’s post hoc analysis or ANOVA on ranks with Student Newman Keul’s post hoc analysis for non-normally distributed samples. Where appropriate a t test was used. A probability value of P < 0.05 was accepted to be statistically significant.


Authors’ contributions

ERB designed and supervised the study, contributed to writing the article and finalization of article. NDPM designed the study and performed all the experiments involved, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. RA, NN, TS, KMR, SA conducted experiments and analyzed the data. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.


This work was supported in part from DOE grant (DE-PS02-09ER-01 to E.R.B).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Diagnostic Nanosystems, Marshall University
Department of Public Health, Marshall University
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Marshall University
Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Toxicology, Marshall University
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University


  1. Majumdar A. Sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Indian J Crit Care Med Peer-Review Off Publ Indian Soc Crit Care Med. 2010;14(1):14–21. doi:10.4103/0972-5229.63031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lee SY, Lee YS, Choi HM, Ko YS, Lee HY, Jo SK, et al. Distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms of septic acute kidney injury: role of immune suppression and renal tubular cell apoptosis in murine model of septic acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(11):2997–3006. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825b912d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bougle A, Duranteau J. Pathophysiology of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: the role of global renal blood flow and renal vascular resistance. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;174:89–97. doi:10.1159/000329243.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Stoyanoff TR, Todaro JS, Aguirre MV, Zimmermann MC, Brandan NC. Amelioration of lipopolysaccharide-induced acute kidney injury by erythropoietin: involvement of mitochondria-regulated apoptosis. Toxicology. 2014;318:13–21. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2014.01.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Schrier RW, Wang W. Acute renal failure and sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(2):159–69. doi:10.1056/NEJMra032401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang Z, Holthoff JH, Seely KA, Pathak E, Spencer HJ 3rd, Gokden N, et al. Development of oxidative stress in the peritubular capillary microenvironment mediates sepsis-induced renal microcirculatory failure and acute kidney injury. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(2):505–16. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.10.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Xu C, Chang A, Hack BK, Eadon MT, Alper SL, Cunningham PN. TNF-mediated damage to glomerular endothelium is an important determinant of acute kidney injury in sepsis. Kidney Int. 2014;85(1):72–81. doi:10.1038/ki.2013.286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Doi K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PS, Star RA. Animal models of sepsis and sepsis-induced kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(10):2868–78. doi:10.1172/JCI39421.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Katsumi H, Fukui K, Sato K, Maruyama S, Yamashita S, Mizumoto E, et al. Pharmacokinetics and preventive effects of platinum nanoparticles as reactive oxygen species scavengers on hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. Metallomics Integr Biometal Sci. 2014;6(5):1050–6. doi:10.1039/c4mt00018h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang X, Jin L, Yao L, Shen FH, Shimer AL, Li X. Antioxidative nanofullerol prevents intervertebral disk degeneration. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:2419–30. doi:10.2147/IJN.S60853.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chistyakov VA, Smirnova YO, Prazdnova EV, Soldatov AV. Possible mechanisms of fullerene C(6)(0) antioxidant action. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:821498. doi:10.1155/2013/821498.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen S, Hou Y, Cheng G, Zhang C, Wang S, Zhang J. Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect endothelial cells from apoptosis induced by oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;154(1):156–66. doi:10.1007/s12011-013-9678-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolli MB, Manne ND, Para R, Nalabotu SK, Nandyala G, Shokuhfar T, et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles attenuate monocrotaline induced right ventricular hypertrophy following pulmonary arterial hypertension. Biomaterials. 2014;35(37):9951–62. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.037.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kyosseva SV, Chen L, Seal S, McGinnis JF. Nanoceria inhibit expression of genes associated with inflammation and angiogenesis in the retina of Vldlr null mice. Exp Eye Res. 2013;116:63–74. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2013.08.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaudhury K, Babu KN, Singh AK, Das S, Kumar A, Seal S. Mitigation of endometriosis using regenerative cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2013;9(3):439–48. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2012.08.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee SS, Song W, Cho M, Puppala HL, Nguyen P, Zhu H, et al. Antioxidant properties of cerium oxide nanocrystals as a function of nanocrystal diameter and surface coating. ACS Nano. 2013;7(11):9693–703. doi:10.1021/nn4026806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark A, Zhu A, Sun K, Petty HR. Cerium oxide and platinum nanoparticles protect cells from oxidant-mediated apoptosis. J Nanoparticle Res Interdiscipl Forum Nanoscale Sci Technol. 2011;13(10):5547–55. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0544-3.Google Scholar
  18. Pirmohamed T, Dowding JM, Singh S, Wasserman B, Heckert E, Karakoti AS, et al. Nanoceria exhibit redox state-dependent catalase mimetic activity. Chem Commun. 2010;46(16):2736–8. doi:10.1039/b922024k.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pourkhalili N, Hosseini A, Nili-Ahmadabadi A, Hassani S, Pakzad M, Baeeri M, et al. Biochemical and cellular evidence of the benefit of a combination of cerium oxide nanoparticles and selenium to diabetic rats. World J Diabetes. 2011;2(11):204–10. doi:10.4239/wjd.v2.i11.204.Google Scholar
  20. Hosseini A, Baeeri M, Rahimifard M, Navaei-Nigjeh M, Mohammadirad A, Pourkhalili N, et al. Antiapoptotic effects of cerium oxide and yttrium oxide nanoparticles in isolated rat pancreatic islets. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013;32(5):544–53. doi:10.1177/0960327112468175.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao Y, Chen K, Ma JL, Gao F. Cerium oxide nanoparticles in cancer. OncoTargets Therapy. 2014;7:835–40. doi:10.2147/OTT.S62057.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Alili L, Sack M, von Montfort C, Giri S, Das S, Carroll KS, et al. Downregulation of tumor growth and invasion by redox-active nanoparticles. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19(8):765–78. doi:10.1089/ars.2012.4831.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Estevez AY, Pritchard S, Harper K, Aston JW, Lynch A, Lucky JJ, et al. Neuroprotective mechanisms of cerium oxide nanoparticles in a mouse hippocampal brain slice model of ischemia. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(6):1155–63. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.06.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Manne ND, Arvapalli R, Nepal N, Thulluri S, Selvaraj V, Shokuhfar T, et al. Therapeutic potential of cerium oxide nanoparticles for the treatment of peritonitis induced by polymicrobial insult in Sprague–Dawley rats. Crit Care Med. 2015;. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001258.Google Scholar
  25. Pinto CF, Watanabe M, da Fonseca CD, Ogata CI, Vattimo Mde F. The sepsis as cause of acute kidney injury: an experimental model. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P. 2012;46: 86–90.Google Scholar
  26. Wu L, Gokden N, Mayeux PR. Evidence for the role of reactive nitrogen species in polymicrobial sepsis-induced renal peritubular capillary dysfunction and tubular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 2007;18(6):1807–15. doi:10.1681/ASN.2006121402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sack M, Alili L, Karaman E, Das S, Gupta A, Seal S, et al. Combination of conventional chemotherapeutics with redox-active cerium oxide nanoparticles-a novel aspect in cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0950.Google Scholar
  28. Younce CW, Wang K, Kolattukudy PE. Hyperglycaemia-induced cardiomyocyte death is mediated via MCP-1 production and induction of a novel zinc-finger protein MCPIP. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;87(4):665–74. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Adembri C, Sgambati E, Vitali L, Selmi V, Margheri M, Tani A, et al. Sepsis induces albuminuria and alterations in the glomerular filtration barrier: a morphofunctional study in the rat. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R277. doi:10.1186/cc10559.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Park SW, Chen SW, Kim M, D’Agati VD, Lee HT. Human heat shock protein 27-overexpressing mice are protected against acute kidney injury after hepatic ischemia and reperfusion. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;297(4):F885–94. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00317.2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bosmann M, Ward PA. The inflammatory response in sepsis. Trends Immunol. 2013;34(3):129–36. doi:10.1016/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirst SM, Karakoti A, Singh S, Self W, Tyler R, Seal S, et al. Bio-distribution and in vivo antioxidant effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in mice. Environ Toxicol. 2013;28(2):107–18. doi:10.1002/tox.20704.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang N, Luo M, Li R, Huang Y, Zhang R, Wu Q, et al. Blockage of JAK/STAT signalling attenuates renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rat. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Renal Assoc. 2008;23(1):91–100. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfm509.Google Scholar
  34. Rawlings JS, Rosler KM, Harrison DA. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. J Cell Sci. 2004;117(Pt 8):1281–3. doi:10.1242/jcs.00963.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoeben A, Landuyt B, Highley MS, Wildiers H, Van Oosterom AT, De Bruijn EA. Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56(4):549–80. doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kockara A, Kayatas M. Renal cell apoptosis and new treatment options in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Ren Fail. 2013;35(2):291–4. doi:10.3109/0886022X.2012.744040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Kothakota S, Azuma T, Reinhard C, Klippel A, Tang J, Chu K, et al. Caspase-3-generated fragment of gelsolin: effector of morphological change in apoptosis. Science. 1997;278(5336):294–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Doi K, Yuen PS, Eisner C, Hu X, Leelahavanichkul A, Schnermann J, et al. Reduced production of creatinine limits its use as marker of kidney injury in sepsis. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN. 2009;20(6):1217–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Vaidya VS, Ferguson MA, Bonventre JV. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:463–93. doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094615.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang Z. Biomarkers, diagnosis and management of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: a narrative review. Heart Lung Vessels. 2015;7(1):64–73.Google Scholar
  41. Hannon RJ, Boston VE. Hyponatraemia and intracellular water in sepsis: an experimental comparison of the effect of fluid replacement with either 0.9 % saline or 5 % dextrose. J Pediatr Surg. 1990;25(4):422–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Chopra M, Golden HB, Mullapudi S, Dowhan W, Dostal DE, Sharma AC. Modulation of myocardial mitochondrial mechanisms during severe polymicrobial sepsis in the rat. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21285. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang C, Blough ER, Arvapalli R, Dai X, Paturi S, Manne N, et al. Metabolic syndrome-induced tubulointerstitial injury: role of oxidative stress and preventive effects of acetaminophen. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;65:1417–26. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.10.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Manne ND, Lima M, Enos RT, Wehner P, Carson JA, Blough E. Altered cardiac muscle mTOR regulation during the progression of cancer cachexia in the ApcMin/+mouse. Int J Oncol. 2013;42(6):2134–40. doi:10.3892/ijo.2013.1893.Google Scholar


© Manne et al. 2015