- Open Access
Anti-ICAM-1 antibody-modified nanostructured lipid carriers: a pulmonary vascular endothelium-targeted device for acute lung injury therapy
© The Author(s) 2018
- Received: 6 September 2018
- Accepted: 10 December 2018
- Published: 29 December 2018
Acute lung injury (ALI) is a life-threatening clinical syndrome without effective treatment. Targeting delivery of glucocorticoid to lung shows potential efficacy for ALI based on their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties, breaking through their clinical application limitation due to systemic side effects. This work was aimed to establish lung-targeted dexamethasone (DEX) loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) with opposite surface charge and investigate their therapeutic effects on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ALI mice.
The diameter of anionic anti-intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (anti-ICAM-1) antibody-conjugated DEX-loaded NLCs (ICAM/DEX/NLCs) and the cationic ones with octadecylamine (ODA) modification (ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs) was about 249.9 and 235.9 nm. The zeta potential of ICAM/DEX/NLCs and ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs was about − 30.3 and 37.4 mV, respectively. Relative to the non-targeted control and ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs, ICAM/DEX/NLCs exhibited higher in vitro cellular uptake in LPS-activated human vascular endothelial cell line EAhy926 after CAM-mediated endocytosis, and stronger in vivo pulmonary distribution in the ALI model mice. In vivo i.v. administration of ICAM/DEX/NLCs significantly attenuated pulmonary inflammatory cells infiltration, and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α and IL-6 in ALI mice. H&E stain also revealed positive histological improvements by ICAM/DEX/NLCs.
ICAM/DEX/NLCs may represent a potential pulmonary endothelium targeted device, which facilitate translation of DEX into clinical ALI treatment.
- Acute lung injury
- Pulmonary vascular endothelium-targeting
- Dexamethasone delivery
- Surface charge
Acute lung injury (ALI) is an inflammatory disease process of the lungs resulting from sepsis, pneumonia or other insults, which could further develop as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI) even pulmonary fibrosis . Numerous research and therapeutic trials have been developed to improve ALI, including administration of relevant growth factors, stem cell therapy and interventions to block coagulation/complement cascade, etc. . Other supportive care such as prone positioning, recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are also employed in clinical treatment . However, no proven therapeutic modality is reported as an effective treatment for ALI in clinic, the mortality rate of ALI/ARDS still remains high.
Great interest remains in the use of glucocorticoid for the salvage of ALI patients, given their potential anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic characteristics . The glucocorticoid showed potentials of inducing anti-inflammatory cytokines expression including IL-10 and inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines expression including TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8, which was of great significance to attenuate the excessive pulmonary inflammation of ALI . Although there exists controversy on the glucocorticoid treatment for ALI, the positive effects of glucocorticoid on clinical ARDS improvements have still been reported widely, such as the reduction of systemic inflammation and the ICU length of stay, etc. [6–9]. Noteworthily, low-dose glucocorticoid administered (e.g. up to 2 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone) in early ALI/ARDS was suggested to reduce the mortality in patients, while high-dose glucocorticoid was widely not recommend due to the disadvantages such as the increasing risk of infection [6, 8]. This highlighted the significance of delivering sufficient therapeutic cargoes to lung with a relative low-dose glucocorticoid regimen for efficacy and safety. Besides, prolonged glucocorticoid treatment was reported to provide improved ALI/ARDS outcomes , further suggesting a well-tolerated treatment was required. Therefore, exploring a method to efficiently deliver glucocorticoid to inflammatory lung and minimize the potential disadvantages (infection, hyperglycaemia and gastrointestinal bleeding, etc.) is of great significance in clinic.
Targeted drug-delivery systems (TDDS) potentially deliver therapeutic cargos to diseased tissues or specific organelles, increasing therapeutic efficacy and decreasing adverse effects [11, 12]. The major nanocarriers such as liposomes, dendrimers, polymeric nanoparticles, micelles, lipid nanoparticles and so on were studied widely for drug delivery due to their distinguishing advantages (tunable size, modifiable surface, controlled drug release, etc.) [13, 14]. For example, mitochondrial-targeted liposomes loaded with paclitaxel were prepared to enhance cytotoxicity toward cancer cells . Folic acid targeted dendrimers with covalently conjugated methotrexate were developed to specifically kill folate receptor-expressing cells . Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs), the second generation of lipid nanoparticles with numerous superiorities including excellent biocompatibility, feasibility of large-scale production and so on, have attracted great interests as potential TDDS . Targeted delivery of drugs by TDDS to lesion could be realized though their passive targeting and active targeting characteristics. Primarily, the carriers can passively accumulate in the interested sites through passive targeting by modulating physical parameters including particle surface charge, diameter, surface modification and so on, which were closely associated with the DDS in vivo fate. For example, it has been reported that anionic nanoparticles have prolonged in vivo circulation time relative to the cationic ones, which potentially undergo rapid clearance from the blood due to the interaction with serum proteins . However, one has to recognize that drugs delivery to pathological site is generally limited via passive targeting, whereas it could be further enhanced via active targeting.
A suitable targeted site plays a vital role for TDDS anchoring and accumulation in the pathological foci. ICAM, a transmembrane glycoprotein preferentially expressed on endothelial cells (ECs), could be dramatically over-expressed under inflammation states. Binding of the circulating DDS with ICAM-1 epitope expressed on endothelium potentially enhances pulmonary accumulation of the particles due to (i) the extended pulmonary luminal surface area (~ 25% of the whole endothelium surface in the body), (ii) the collection of entire cardiac output of venous blood from right ventricle before other organs sharing the arterial output, (iii) the over-expressed ICAM-1 on pulmonary endothelium under ALI relative to the modest expression on normal endothelium of the body, and (iv) low blood flow rate in pulmonary microcirculation . Coupling nanoparticle’s surface with affinity ligands of ICAM-1 epitope such as anti-ICAM-1 antibody potentially realizes the lung-targeted delivery of drugs and the reduction of non-target effects on normal organs .
In this study, dexamethasone (DEX), the long-acting and high-potency glucocorticoid, was used as the model drug. The anionic and cationic anti-ICAM-1 antibody-conjugated dexamethasone loaded NLCs were developed to explore the effects on LPS-induced ALI mice. The physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, cellular transport pathway and bio-distribution of the NLCs were evaluated successively. The in vivo pharmacodynamics after i.v. administration of the NLCs in LPS-induced ALI mice was assessed as well.
Dexamethasone was obtained from Aladdin Bio-chem Technology Co. Limited (Shanghai, China). Medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) were gifted from Gattefosse (France). Monostearin was obtained from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Polyethylene glycol monostearate (PEG2000-SA, MW = 2000) was from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd. (Japan). Octadecylamine (ODA) was from Fluka (USA). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Escherichia coli O55:B5), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and N,N′-disuccinimidyl carbonate (DSC) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Mouse anti-human ICAM-1 antibody (6.5B5) and rat anti-mouse ICAM-1 antibody (YN1/1.7.4) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-IgG antibody was from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG and ACK Lysis Buffer were from Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Near-infrared DiR fluorescent probe was from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). Octadecylamine-fluorescein isothiocyanate (ODA-FITC) and amino-terminated polyethylene glycol monostearate (NH2-PEG2000-SA) were synthesized previously . All other solvents were of analytical or chromatographic grade.
Preparation of NLCs
The NLCs were prepared via solvent diffusion method . In brief, 4 mg dexamethasone, 56 mg monostearin, 30 mg MCT, 0.5 mg NH2-PEG2000-SA and 9.5 mg PEG2000-SA were dissolved in 1 mL ethanol in water bath at 60 °C. Subsequently, 0.1 mL dissolved solution was removed and rapidly dispersed into 1.9 mL of deionized water (ethanol:water = 1:19, v/v) at 60 °C under 400 rpm stirring (DC-40, Hangzhou Electrical Engineering Instruments, China) for 2 min. The obtained nano-suspensions were placed at room temperature to solidify the melted lipid droplets. Then 25 μL of 0.2 mg/mL water-DSC solution (NH2-PEG2000-SA:DSC = 1:1, mol/mol) was sufficiently dispersed in the NLC dispersions via 30 s vortex, followed by 3 h reaction at room temperature with slight shaking. After reaction, 10.4 μg anti-ICAM-1 antibody was added in the dispersion followed by another 3 h slight shaking at room temperature. The anti-ICAM-1 antibody-conjugated dexamethasone loaded NLCs (ICAM/DEX/NLCs) with 5 mg/mL concentration were prepared. To prepare the non-targeted control NLCs, anti-IgG antibody was used instead of anti-ICAM-1 antibody to prepare IgG-modified NLCs (IgG/DEX/NLCs), while the other procedures were the same as ICAM/DEX/NLCs preparation.
Meanwhile, 3 mg octadecylamine (ODA) was used instead of 3 mg monostearin to prepare the ODA modified NLCs with anti-ICAM-1 antibody conjugation (ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs) and anti-IgG antibody conjugation (IgG/DEX/ODA-NLCs). The other procedures were the same as mentioned above.
Characterization of NLCs
The hydrodynamic diameters, polydispersity index (PI) and zeta potential of the nanoparticles were detected by dynamic light scattering using a Zetasizer (3000HS, Malvern Instruments Ltd, UK). A transmission electronic microscopy (TEM, JEM-1200EX, JEOL, Japan) was employed to observe the morphologies of the nanoparticles. The samples were negatively stained using 1% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 1 min followed by being photographed via TEM.
Drug encapsulation efficiency and drug loading
In vitro drug release
The in vitro dexamethasone release study was carried out using dialysis method . The prepared dexamethasone-loaded NLCs were diluted to 1 mg/mL (carriers concentration) firstly. Afterwards, 1 mL of the diluted nano-suspensions was transferred into a dialysis bag (MW cut off 7 kDa) followed by immersion into 20 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) for release study using an incubator shaker at 37 °C (60 rpm, HZ-8812S, Scientific and Educational Equipment plant, Tai Cang, China). 1 mL dissolution medium was withdrawn and 1 mL fresh PBS was added simultaneously at scheduled time points. The dexamethasone released from the formulated NLCs in the dissolution medium was analyzed using HPLC.
EAhy926 cells (EAs), the human vascular endothelial cell line , were obtained from ATCC. The cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) without antibiotic. The humidified cell incubator was set at 37 °C with 5% CO2. To establish in vitro cell model of inflammatory pathological endothelium with over-expressed ICAM-1, the EAs were incubated with 400 ng/mL of LPS for 24 h as our previous study reported .
Cellular internalization study
The octadecylamine-fluorescein isothiocyanate (ODA-FITC) was used as the fluorescence probe to label the NLCs for cellular uptake study . Briefly, 3 mg ODA-FITC was used instead of 3 mg monostearin to prepare ODA-FITC labeled NLCs via solvent diffusion method as mentioned above. The EAs were transferred to 24-well plate (5 × 104 cells/well) to grow 24 h for adherence followed by 24 h LPS-stimulation. Afterwards, the quiescent and activated EAs were incubated with FITC-labeled ICAM/DEX/NLCs, IgG/DEX/NLCs, ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs and IgG/DEX/ODA-NLCs for scheduled time. The incubation concentration of the NLCs is 20 μg/mL. At the end of incubation, the supernatant of medium was withdrew and the cells were washed using PBS, followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature. A fluorescence microscope (Leica DM4000 B; Leica, Solms, Germany) was used to observe the cellular fluorescence qualitatively.
The internalization of the nanoparticles was further quantitatively analyzed by a flow cytometer (FC500MCL, Beckman Coulter). The EAs were seeded in 6-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well). The quiescent and LPS-activated EAs were incubated with the formulated NLCs as mentioned above for predetermined time. At the end of incubation, the cells were washed for two times using PBS, followed by being trypsinized and harvested via centrifugation for detection.
Transport pathway study
The transport pathway study was carried out using ODA-FITC labeled ICAM/DEX/NLCs in EAs. The EAs were transferred to 24-well plate (5 × 104 cells/well) with sterile coverglass to grow 24 h for adherence. Three experimental groups were designed including (i) the activated EAs incubated with ICAM/DEX/NLCs, (ii) the activated EAs blocked with free anti-ICAM-1 antibody (3 μg/mL) for 1 h followed by incubation with ICAM/DEX/NLCs (ICAM-1 blockage study), (iii) the resting EAs incubated with ICAM/DEX/NLCs. The incubation concentration of ICAM/DEX/NLCs is 20 μg/mL. After 2 h incubation, the supernatant of medium was withdrawn and the cells were washed using PBS, followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature. To evaluate the ICAM-1 expression on cells, the fixed resting and activated EAs were incubated with the primary antibody (Mouse anti-human ICAM-1 antibody) overnight at 4 °C followed by incubation with fluorescent secondary antibody (Cy3-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG) for 1 h at room temperature. The cells growing on the coverglass were photographed using a confocal microscopy (OLYMPUS FV1000).
The internalization of the nanoparticles was further quantitatively analyzed by a flow cytometer. The EAs were seeded in 6-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well). The experimental groups were the same as the groups designed in qualitative determination experiment mentioned above. At the end of incubation, the cells were washed by PBS, followed by being trypsinized and harvested via centrifugation for detection.
The male Balb/c mice (7–8 weeks) were purchased from Shanghai Silaike Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. The animals were housed in a climate-controlled environment, with standard food and water and a 12/12 h light/dark cycle.
The bio-distribution study was carried out using DiR-labeled NLCs in healthy mice and the ALI model mice. 1 mg near-infrared fluorescent dye of DiR was used instead of 1 mg monostearin to prepare DiR-labeled ICAM/DEX/NLCs, IgG/DEX/NLCs, ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs and IgG/DEX/ODA-NLCs via solvent diffusion method. To establish murine ALI model, the mice were anesthetized and challenged slowly with an intratracheal instillation of LPS (2 mg/kg) , followed by stimulation for 6 h. Subsequently, the healthy mice and the ALI model mice were tail-intravenously administrated with 0.2 mL of the DiR-labeled NLCs. After 24 h later, the mice were sacrificed and the lung tissues were excised. A Maestro in vivo imaging system (Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) was used to observe the pulmonary accumulation of the formulated NLCs and semi-quantitatively analyze pulmonary fluorescent signals intensity.
In vivo pharmacodynamics study
All mice were divided into seven groups randomly with six mice per group: control group, ALI model group, dexamethasone treated group, IgG/DEX/ODA-NLCs treated group, ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs treated group, IgG/DEX/NLCs treated group and ICAM/DEX/NLCs treated group. The ALI model mice of treatment groups were tail-intravenously administrated with the formulated drugs at a dexamethasone dose of 1.2 mg/kg. While the control and ALI model mice were i.v. administrated with saline. After 12 h and 24 h drug administration, the mice were sacrificed and the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lungs without bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were harvested for next in vivo therapy study.
Pulmonary inflammation assessments
The collection of BALF was performed through a tracheal cannula method . In brief, 2 mL of sterile PBS was injected in the lung and slowly withdrawn repeatedly till five times. The harvested BALF samples were centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 10 min followed by storing the cell-free supernatant at − 80 °C. The levels of cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the BALF were determined by ELISA assay (Boster Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China) according to the manufactured protocol. In other to determine the inflammatory cells infiltration, the cell pellet obtained after centrifugation was dispersed in ACK Lysis Buffer to lyse the red blood cells for 2 min on an ice bath, followed by termination with PBS and centrifugation. Afterwards, the collected cell pellet was re-suspended in 0.5 mL PBS. 0.05 mL of the suspensions was used to evaluate the pulmonary total inflammatory cells infiltration through a hemocytometer. 0.45 mL of the suspensions was used to determine the pulmonary neutrophils (PMNs) infiltration through a flow cytometry. Double-labeling experiment of PMNs using FITC rat anti-mouse CD11b (FITC-CD11b, M1/70) and PE rat anti-mouse Ly-6G and Ly-6C (PE-Gr-1, RB6-8C5) antibodies were carried out at 4 °C for 20 min. Then the cells were rinsed using PBS followed by centrifugation, and finally fixed using 2% paraformaldehyde. A flow cytometer was used to detect the ratio of PMNs vs. total cells in the BALF. The PMNs concentration was obtained by the product of total cells concentration and the ratio of PMNs vs. total cells.
Pulmonary histopathology examination
The pulmonary histopathology examination was carried out using the murine lung tissues without BAL, performed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain. The pulmonary tissue samples were immersed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 48 h, followed by dissection, dehydration, embedding in paraffin and slicing at a thickness of 5 μm sections successively. Hematoxylin and eosin were used to stain the specimen based on the procedures accurately. A light microscope was finally employed to photograph the pulmonary histopathology characteristics at 200× magnification (Nikon, ECLIPSE Ni).
All data represent the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance difference between two groups was assessed with Student’s t-tests. p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Physicochemical properties of the NLCs
The characterization of the formulated NLCs
Zeta potential (mV)
249.9 ± 21.5
0.231 ± 0.025
− 30.3 ± 0.5
90.11 ± 1.34
3.62 ± 0.05
229.3 ± 17.2
0.225 ± 0.016
− 28.7 ± 1.1
86.72 ± 0.84
3.49 ± 0.03
235.9 ± 1.8
0.166 ± 0.017
37.4 ± 0.7
82.93 ± 0.94
3.34 ± 0.04
227.9 ± 7.4
0.201 ± 0.029
34.2 ± 3.3
81.39 ± 3.23
3.28 ± 0.13
The cytotoxicity and cellular uptake study
Noteworthily, the anionic ICAM/DEX/NLCs showed lower uptake efficiency than the cationic ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs in quiescent EAs (Additional file 1: Figures S1, S2), whereas the uptake results were reversed in activated EAs under inflammatory pathological condition (Fig. 2b). The flow cytometry examination also confirmed higher uptake efficiency of anionic ICAM/DEX/NLCs than cationic ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs in activated EAs (Fig. 2c). The results suggested that although cationic ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs owned higher uptake than anionic ICAM/DEX/NLCs in quiescent EAs due to the potential electrostatic interaction with negatively charged cell membrane of the former, whereas anionic ICAM/DEX/NLCs may be more favorable for cellular uptake mediated by CAM-mediated endocytosis in activated EAs with over-expressed ICAM-1 epitope. Similar higher cellular internalization of anionic nanoparticles than the cationic ones has also been revealed in previous studies [30–33]. Overall, ICAM/DEX/NLCs showed promising cellular internalization ability in activated EAs, which is of great significance to increase DEX accumulation in inflammatory endothelium and enhance endothelial intervention.
Transport pathway of ICAM/DEX/NLCs
The transport pathway of ICAM/DEX/NLCs in EAs was further investigated after 2 h incubation using a confocal microscopy. Figure 3a exhibits the internalization results of the FITC-labeled ICAM/DEX/NLCs in LPS-activated EAs, activated EAs with ICAM-1 epitopes blockage and resting EAs, respectively. The red fluorescent signals reflected the expression level of ICAM-1 epitopes on the EAs, while the green signals and blue signals signified the internalized ICAM/DEX/NLCs and the cell nucleus with Hochest 33342 staining. As Fig. 3a showed, the activated EAs showed significantly higher red fluorescence signals relative to the resting EAs, suggesting the ICAM-1 was over-expressed on the cells surface after LPS stimulation. After 2 h incubation, significantly more ICAM/DEX/NLCs were internalized in activated EAs than that in resting EAs. Meanwhile, the internalization of ICAM/DEX/NLCs in activated EAs was reduced after ICAM-1 blockage. The results were more directly observed by the semi-quantitative analysis of the fluorescent pictures using “ImageJ” (Fig. 3b), and were also further demonstrated by flow cytometry quantitatively (Additional file 1: Figure S3). Besides, Fig. 2b also showed that ICAM/DEX/NLCs exhibited higher cellular uptake than IgG/DEX/NLCs in activated EAs, especially after a short incubation. These results directly suggested that the internalization of ICAM/DEX/NLCs was associated with ICAM-1 epitopes, indicating the widely accepted CAM-mediated endocytosis  was the potential internalization mechanism of anti-ICAM-1 antibody-conjugated nanoparticles in this study. Similar results were also demonstrated in our previous study, suggesting the anti-ICAM-1 antibody-conjugated nanoparticles were internalized by LPS-activated EAs through CAM-mediated endocytosis .
Pulmonary-distribution of NLCs
In vivo pharmacodynamics assessments
The in vivo therapeutic efficacy of ICAM/DEX/NLCs, IgG/DEX/NLCs, ICAM/DEX/ODA-NLCs and IgG/DEX/ODA-NLCs was investigated using a widely studied LPS-induced murine model of ALI . LPS, a main component of gram-negative bacterial cell wall involved in sepsis-mediated ALI, could act on the Toll-like receptor 4 to exacerbate inflammatory cascades in lung, pulmonary inflammatory cells infiltration and hemorrhage, etc. Thus the related inflammatory mediators in lung were measured after 12 h and 24 h drug administration for pharmacodynamics assessments.
The infiltration of inflammatory cells in lung resulting from high pulmonary capillary permeability is another pathological basis of ALI. Thereinto the infiltrated PMNs after activation could produce serine proteases, reactive oxygen species, cytokines and so on to further damage the lung. Therefore, the therapy of ALI by the drugs can also be evaluated via their inhibition effects on pulmonary inflammation leakage. Figure 5c, d showed the attenuation effects of total inflammatory cells and PMNs infiltration in lung by the drugs, respectively. The PMNs were detected using FITC-labeled anti-CD11b antibody and PE-labeled anti-Gr-1 antibody to specifically identify their typical epitopes of CD11b and Gr-1 (FITC-CD11b+, PE-Gr-1+) . It was found that the total inflammatory cell number in BALF was dramatically up-regulated with severe PMNs infiltration after LPS-stimulation. Similar to the results of pro-inflammatory cytokines assessments, ICAM/DEX/NLCs significantly reduced the LPS-induced pulmonary migration of total inflammatory cells and PMNs after 24 h i.v. administration compared with the other formulations. The results indicated the anti-inflammatory activities of ICAM/DEX/NLCs on the LPS-induced ALI mice by attenuating inflammatory cells infiltration.
In our work, the pulmonary vascular endothelium-targeted NLCs mediated by anti-ICAM-1 antibody with negative surface charge or positive surface charge were developed to delivery DEX to lung and explore an alternative pathway for ALI therapy. Our study demonstrated that the anionic ICAM/DEX/NLCs could encapsulate dexamethasone effectively, and display low cytotoxicity, significant enhancement cellular uptake in LPS-activated EAs, as well as the advantage of pulmonary distribution. In vivo pharmacodynamics study demonstrated that the anionic ICAM/DEX/NLCs showed significant anti-inflammation efficacy on attenuating TNF-α, IL-6 and inflammatory cells infiltration in BALF. The positive pulmonary tissue structure improvement by ICAM/DEX/NLCs was further confirmed through H&E stain. The results suggested that, ICAM/DEX/NLCs may represent a potential lung-targeting candidate favoring ALI therapy in clinic.
YZD, FHL and GKW conceived and designed the study. SJL carried out the experimental work on the whole and wrote the manuscript. LC performed the physicochemical properties of NLCs and analyzed the data with SJL. LXX, SSH and ZWC participated in the animal experiments. XLX and XJW participated in the cellular experiments and gave a hand for spell and grammar check. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Thanks for the kindly donation of Medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) by Gattefosse (France).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its additional file.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal procedures were carried out in accordance with National Institutes of Health (NIH, USA) protocols, approved by the local animal experiments ethical committee of Animal Experiments at Zhejiang University in China.
The work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671889) and Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo (2018A610273).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Ravikumar P, Menon JU, Punnakitikashem P, Gyawali D, Togao O, Takahashi M, et al. Nanoparticle facilitated inhalational delivery of erythropoietin receptor cDNA protects against hyperoxic lung injury. Nanomedicine. 2016;12:811–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Standiford TJ, Ward PA. Therapeutic targeting of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Transl Res. 2016;167:183–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sahetya SK, Mancebo J, Brower RG. Fifty years of research in ARDS. Vt selection in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1519–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Villar J, Belda J, Anon JM, Blanco J, Perez-Mendez L, Ferrando C, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:342.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tu GW, Shi Y, Zheng YJ, Ju MJ, He HY, Ma GG, et al. Glucocorticoid attenuates acute lung injury through induction of type 2 macrophage. J Transl Med. 2017;15:181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lamontagne F, Briel M, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Bhatnagar N, Meade M. Corticosteroid therapy for acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and severe pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care. 2010;25:420–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meduri GU, Golden E, Freire AX, Taylor E, Zaman M, Carson SJ, et al. Methylprednisolone infusion in early severe ARDS: results of a randomized controlled trial. Chest. 2007;131:954–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang ZG, Lei XL, Li XL. Early application of low-dose glucocorticoid improves acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13:1215–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meduri GU, Annane D, Chrousos GP, Marik PE, Sinclair SE. Activation and regulation of systemic inflammation in ARDS: rationale for prolonged glucocorticoid therapy. Chest. 2009;136:1631–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meduri GU, Bridges L, Shih MC, Marik PE, Siemieniuk R, Kocak M. Prolonged glucocorticoid treatment is associated with improved ARDS outcomes: analysis of individual patients’ data from four randomized trials and trial-level meta-analysis of the updated literature. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:829–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo Y, Wang X, Du D, Lin Y. Hyaluronic acid-conjugated apoferritin nanocages for lung cancer targeted drug delivery. Biomater Sci. 2015;3:1386–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zylberberg C, Matosevic S. Pharmaceutical liposomal drug delivery: a review of new delivery systems and a look at the regulatory landscape. Drug Deliv. 2016;23:3319–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhao Z, Lou S, Hu Y, Zhu J, Zhang C. A nano-in-nano polymer-dendrimer nanoparticle-based nanosystem for controlled multidrug delivery. Mol Pharm. 2017;14:2697–710.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhai Y, Zhai G. Advances in lipid-based colloid systems as drug carrier for topic delivery. J Control Release. 2014;193:90–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patri AK, Kukowska-Latallo JF, Baker JJ. Targeted drug delivery with dendrimers: comparison of the release kinetics of covalently conjugated drug and non-covalent drug inclusion complex. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:2203–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bondi ML, Ferraro M, Di Vincenzo S, Gerbino S, Cavallaro G, Giammona G, et al. Effects in cigarette smoke stimulated bronchial epithelial cells of a corticosteroid entrapped into nanostructured lipid carriers. J Nanobiotechnology. 2014;12:46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tagalakis AD, Lee DH, Bienemann AS, Zhou H, Munye MM, Saraiva L, et al. Multifunctional, self-assembling anionic peptide–lipid nanocomplexes for targeted siRNA delivery. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8406–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howard M, Zern BJ, Anselmo AC, Shuvaev VV, Mitragotri S, Muzykantov V. Vascular targeting of nanocarriers: perplexing aspects of the seemingly straightforward paradigm. ACS Nano. 2014;8:4100–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zern BJ, Chacko AM, Liu J, Greineder CF, Blankemeyer ER, Radhakrishnan R, et al. Reduction of nanoparticle avidity enhances the selectivity of vascular targeting and PET detection of pulmonary inflammation. ACS Nano. 2013;7:2461–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li SJ, Wang XJ, Hu JB, Kang XQ, Chen L, Xu XL, et al. Targeting delivery of simvastatin using ICAM-1 antibody-conjugated nanostructured lipid carriers for acute lung injury therapy. Drug Deliv. 2017;24:402–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu JB, Song GL, Liu D, Li SJ, Wu JH, Kang XQ, et al. Sialic acid-modified solid lipid nanoparticles as vascular endothelium-targeting carriers for ischemia-reperfusion-induced acute renal injury. Drug Deliv. 2017;24:1856–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiang QY, Wang MT, Chen F, Gong T, Jian YL, Zhang ZR, et al. Lung-targeting delivery of dexamethasone acetate loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. Arch Pharm Res. 2007;30:519–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kang X, Chen H, Li S, Jie L, Hu J, Wang X, et al. Magnesium lithospermate B loaded PEGylated solid lipid nanoparticles for improved oral bioavailability. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;161:597–605.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kurosaki T, Kawakami S, Higuchi Y, Suzuki R, Maruyama K, Sasaki H, et al. Development of anionic bubble lipopolyplexes for efficient and safe gene transfection with ultrasound exposure in mice. J Control Release. 2014;176:24–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chai GH, Xu Y, Chen SQ, Cheng B, Hu FQ, You J, et al. Transport mechanisms of solid lipid nanoparticles across caco-2 cell monolayers and their related cytotoxicology. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:5929–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song JH, Kim JY, Piao C, Lee S, Kim B, Song SJ, et al. Delivery of the high-mobility group box 1 box A peptide using heparin in the acute lung injury animal models. J Control Release. 2016;234:33–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu YM, Huang JY, Wang H, Lou XF, Liao MH, Hong LJ, et al. Targeted therapy of brain ischaemia using Fas ligand antibody conjugated PEG-lipid nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2014;35:530–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ohashi A, Murata A, Cho Y, Ichinose S, Sakamaki Y, Nishio M, et al. The expression and localization of RNase and RNase inhibitor in blood cells and vascular endothelial cells in homeostasis of the vascular system. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e174237.Google Scholar
- Frohlich E. The role of surface charge in cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of medical nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:5577–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- He C, Hu Y, Yin L, Tang C, Yin C. Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3657–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nie Y, Ji L, Ding H, Xie L, Li L, He B, et al. Cholesterol derivatives based charged liposomes for doxorubicin delivery: preparation, in vitro and in vivo characterization. Theranostics. 2012;2:1092–103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu Q, Li H, Xia Q, Liu Y, Xiao K. Role of surface charge in determining the biological effects of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:7073–88.Google Scholar
- Yin Q, Ke B, Chen X, Guan Y, Feng P, Chen G, et al. Effects of liposomes charge on extending sciatic nerve blockade of n-ethyl bromide of lidocaine in rats. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38582.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ghaffarian R, Muro S. Distinct subcellular trafficking resulting from monomeric vs multimeric targeting to endothelial ICAM-1: implications for drug delivery. Mol Pharm. 2014;11:4350–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jiang S, Li S, Hu J, Xu X, Wang X, Kang X, et al. Combined delivery of angiopoietin-1 gene and simvastatin mediated by anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 antibody-conjugated ternary nanoparticles for acute lung injury therapy. Nanomedicine. 2018;15:25–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ajibade AA, Wang Q, Cui J, Zou J, Xia X, Wang M, et al. TAK1 negatively regulates NF-kappaB and p38 MAP kinase activation in Gr-1+ CD11b+ neutrophils. Immunity. 2012;36:43–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar