Skip to main content

Overcoming chemotherapy resistance using pH-sensitive hollow MnO2 nanoshells that target the hypoxic tumor microenvironment of metastasized oral squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

Background

Smart nanoscale drug delivery systems that target acidic tumor microenvironments (TME) could offer controlled release of drugs and modulate the hypoxic TME to enhance cancer therapy. The majority of previously reported MnO2 nanostructures are nanoparticles, nanosheets, or nanocomposites incorporated with other types of nanoparticles, which may not offer the most effective method for drug loading or for the controlled release of therapeutic payloads. Previous studies have designed MnO2 nanoshells that achieve tumor-specific and enhanced combination therapy for localized advanced cancer. However, the therapeutic effect of MnO2 nanoshells on metastatic cancer is still uncertain.

Result

Here, intelligent “theranostic” platforms were synthesized based on hollow mesoporous MnO2 (H-MnO2) nanoshells that were loaded with chemotherapy agents docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) to form H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells, which were designed to alleviate tumor hypoxia, attenuate angiogenesis, trigger the dissolution of Mn2+, and synergize the efficacy of first-class anticancer chemotherapy. The obtained H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells decomposed in the acidic TME, releasing the loaded drugs (TP) and simultaneously attenuated tumor hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression by inducing endogenous tumor hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) decomposition. In vitro experiments showed that compared with the control group, the proliferation, colony formation and migration ability of CAL27 and SCC7 cells were significantly reduced in H-MnO2-PEG/TP group, while cell apoptosis was enhanced, and the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α(HIF-1α) was down-regulated. In vivo experiments showed that tumor to normal organ uptake ratio (T/N ratio) of mice in H-MnO2-PEG/TP group was significantly higher than that in TP group alone (without the nanoparticle), and tumor growth was partially delayed. In the H-MnO2-PEG/TP treatment group, HE staining showed that most of the tumor cells were severely damaged, and TUNEL assay showed cell apoptosis was up-regulated. He staining of renal and liver sections showed no obvious fibrosis, necrosis or hypertrophy, indicating good biosafety. Fluorescence staining showed that HIF-1α expression was decreased, suggesting that the accumulation of MnO2 in the tumor caused the decomposition of H2O2 into O2 and alleviated the hypoxia of the tumor.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a remarkable in vivo and in vitro synergistic therapeutic effect is achieved through the combination of TP chemotherapy, which simultaneously triggered a series of antiangiogenic and oxidative antitumor reactions.

Graphic abstract

Highlights

  • A theranostic platform has been developed using hollow mesoporous MnO2 (H-MnO2) nanoshells.

  • H-MnO2 nanoshells trigger H2O2 decomposition into O2, reducing TME hypoxia and HIF-1α expression.

  • H-MnO2 nanoshells exert an anti-angiogenic effect by downregulating HIF-1α expression.

  • In combination with chemotherapy, H-MnO2 nanoshells have excellent efficacy in pulmonary metastasized oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Introduction

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is characterized by oxygen-deficient solid tumors. Hypoxic conditions significantly promote tumor heterogeneity and increase metastatic spread [1,2,3]. Furthermore, undesirable angiogenesis and immunosuppression are caused by disordered metabolism and unstable genome phenotype accelerated in hypoxic TMEs, which consistently contribute to tumor resistance to various oxygen-related therapeutics [4, 5]. Many of the hallmarks of metastatic cancers are related to the hypoxic TME [6], which stimulates hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-driven transcriptional responses that upregulate the expression of hypoxia-inducible genes that facilitate invasion and metastasis [7, 8]. These hypoxic effects play essential roles in the outcomes of various cancer therapies [5, 9, 10].

Nanoscale drug delivery systems (nano-DDSs) have been regarded as an ideal approach to overcome the hypoxic TME, as nano-DDSs are capable of responding to the inherent acidic and hypoxic features of the TME [11, 12]. Recently, several studies have focused on the development of manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanostructures that can decompose under the acidic TME [13,14,15,16], generating Mn2+ ions that could enhance T1 images during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [17, 18]. Accordingly, MnO2 nanostructures could offer a safe DDS without long-term toxicity in in vivo therapy [13,14,15,16]. MnO2 nanostructures could also relieve tumor hypoxia by triggering the decomposition of H2O2 that is present in the TME [19, 20]. Hollow nanostructures with mesoporous shells (such as hollow mesoporous silica) have large cavities that have been demonstrated to be excellent drug loading/delivery systems, loading high quantities of therapeutic agents, whose release may be precisely controlled by tuning the shell structure or coating [21, 22].

The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) has become a first-line anticancer therapy in advanced OSCC, which provides good progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [23, 24]. Previous research has also demonstrated the limitations caused by TME hypoxia, which contributes to metastasis and angiogenesis of OSCC [25,26,27,28]. TP can be co-loaded into the H-MnO2-PEG nano-platform (H-MnO2-PEG/TP) with high loading capacities. Under acidic pH, the rapid decomposition of the MnO2 nanoshells leads to the release of the loaded drugs (TP), while simultaneously resulting in significantly enhanced T1-images during MRI.

Lung metastasis is a common feature of advanced OSCC and associated with a poor prognosis (5-year OS < 30%), which is contributed to by hypoxia-induced resistance [26, 27]—unlike pulmonary metastasis of HER2-positive breast cancer, which can be effectively treated through targeted therapies. Currently, there is a lack of effective targeted treatments for OSCC lung metastasis. Moreover, previous research has shown that HIF, which can be downregulated after hypoxia is relieved, is a promoting factor of angiogenesis. Considering MnO2 are able to target the TME and generate O2, we hypothesized that using hollow MnO2 nanostructures as smart DDSs may achieve an ideal therapeutic effect in the application of pulmonary metastasis of OSCC by reversing hypoxia-induced chemotherapy resistance.

Previous studies have designed similar smart DDSs to achieve tumor-specific enhanced combination therapy [29, 30]. In a previous system, mesoporous MnO2 shells combined with chlorine e6 (Ce6) and doxorubicin (DOX) were used to treat 4T1 cells in a subcutaneous model, which obtained an ideal effect. To the best of our knowledge, the therapeutic effect of MnO2 particles on OSCC pulmonary metastasis has not been assessed. In our research, we aimed to develop a system that could target OSCC lung metastasis by using pH-sensitive mesoporous MnO2 nanoshells co-loaded with first-line OSCC chemotherapeutic drugs, TP. We also assessed whether these TP-loaded MnO2 nanoshells were effective against TP-resistant OSCC cells.

Materials and methods

Materials

Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, MW≈15,000), and polyacrylic acid (PAA, MW ≈ 1800) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent CO., Ltd. (China). Coumarin-modified cisplatin and rhodamine-modified docetaxel were purchased from Xian Qiyue Biotechnic CO., Ltd. (China).

Synthesis of H-MnO2-PEG/TP

Solid silica nanoparticles (sSiO2) were synthesized following the reported method [31]. Then, an aqueous solution of KMnO4 (300 mg) was added dropwise to the sSiO2 suspension (40 mg) under ultrasonication. After 6 h, the precipitate was obtained by centrifugating the suspension at 14,800 rpm. The as-prepared mesoporous MnO2-coated sSiO2 were dissolved in 2 M Na2CO3 aqueous solution at 60 °C for 12 h. The obtained hollow mesoporous MnO2 (H-MnO2) nanoshells were centrifuged and washed with water several times. Then, 5 ml of the H-MnO2 solution (2 mg/ml) was added to 10 ml PAH solution (5 mg/ml) under ultrasonication. After stirring for 2 h, the above solution was centrifuged and washed with water. The obtained H-MnO2/PAH solution was added drop wise to PAA (10 ml, 5 mg/ml) under ultrasonication. After 2 h of stirring, the above solution was centrifuged and washed with water, before it was mixed with mPEG-5 K-NH2 (50 mg) under ultrasonication for 30 min. After adding EDC (15 mg) and stirring for 12 h, the prepared H-MnO2-PEG was collected by centrifugation and washed with water three times. For docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) loading, the H-MnO2-PEG solution (0.2 mg/ml) was mixed with different concentrations of TP for 12 h. TP were co-loaded into H-MnO2-PEG with appropriate concentrations, yielding H-MnO2-PEG/TP which were used in further experiments.

Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to characterize the nanoparticle morphology. Ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectra were measured with a PerkinElmer Lambda 750 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer. Nanoparticle size and zeta potential were determined by a Malvern Zetasizer (ZEN3690, Malvern, UK) and Nano ZS90 (Malvern, UK). Surface area and pore size were measured by Surface Area and Porosity Analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument Corp. ASAP2050). The functional groups and chemical structure of the nanofibers were performed by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Nicolet iS50) in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm–1.

Degradation and drug release studies

H-MnO2-PEG was incubated with PBS at different pH values (4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.4) for different time periods (0–36 h). At a given time point, the solution was measured by SEM and UV–Vis spectrometry for characterization. To study the TP release, a solution of H-MnO2-PEG/TP was dialyzed against PBS with different pH values (4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.4) at room temperature. The amount of TP released at different time points was measured by UV–Vis spectrometry.

In vitro cell experiments

The tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell line CAL27 was purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Mice oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line SCC7 was provided as a gift from the Nanjing Medical University (China). For cell toxicity assays, cells were seeded into 96-well plates (1 × 104 per well) for 24 h and incubated with a series of concentrations of TP. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) solution (0.5 mg/ml) was added to the wells to measure the cell viability of the treated cells relative to the untreated cells. For confocal fluorescence microscopy, CAL27 cells were seeded onto coverslips at the bottom of a dish containing H-MnO2-PEG/TP (docetaxel: 3.1 nM, cisplatin: 18 nM) for different incubation times (1, 4, 8, and 12 h). After washing with PBS three times, the cells were labeled with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and imaged using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica SP5). Lentivirus-transduced stable cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 1000 cells per well and incubated for 10–14 days. The colonies were fixed and stained, and those with more than 50 cells were counted under a dissecting microscope.

Western blot analysis

Proteins were extracted from OSCC cells treated with H-MnO2-PEG/TP (docetaxel: 3.1 nM, cisplatin: 18 nM) for 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 h. The membranes were blocked by adding QuickBlock™ Blocking Buffer at room temperature for 20 min and then incubating with primary antibodies (β-actin, 1:1000; HIF-1α, 1:1000) overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were then incubated with fluorescently-labelled anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (7704, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) at a 1:10000 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence. The observation and analysis of immunoreactive bands were performed using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, USA).

Animal models

SPF BALB/c nude mice (nu/nu, 4 weeks old, weighing approximately 20 g) were purchased from Shanghai experimental animal center (Shanghai, China) and placed in the SPF facility of the Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. All laboratory procedures were approved by the Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee at the hospital. High metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma was established. After luciferase lentivirus transfection, CAL27 cells (1 × 106) were suspended in 50 μl of PBS and injected by intravenous injection (IV) or subcutaneous injection (SC). The mice bearing CAL27 tumors were treated 10 days after injection.

In vivo imaging

In vivo fluorescence imaging was performed using the Maestro In-Vivo Fluorescence Imaging System (CRi Inc., USA). MRI was conducted under a BioSpec 70/20 USR (Bruker, USA) with a special coil for small animal imaging.

Immunohistochemistry

CAL27 tumor-bearing mice were injected intravenously with PBS or H-MnO2-PEG/TP. Liver, kidney, and lungs bearing tumors were surgically excised 20- or 120-min post injection. Tissue sections (4 mm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Terminal deoxynucleotide transferase dUTP notch end labeling (TUNEL) was used to detect apoptotic cells. To detect oxidation, the tumor sections were treated with mouse anti-HIF1α primary antibody (dilution 1:200, Abcam Inc. USA) and Alexa Flour® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (dilution 1:200, CST Inc. USA) following the instructions. Tumor blood vessels were stained by anti-CD31 mouse monoclonal antibody (dilution 1:200, Abcam Inc.) and Alexa Flour® 555-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (dilution 1:200, CST Inc., USA), subsequently. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (dilution 1:5000, Invitrogen, USA). The obtained slices were observed by confocal microscopy (Leica SP5, Germany).

In vivo cancer treatment

CAL27 tumor-bearing mice were injected via i.p. with 100 μl of PBS, TP, or H-MnO2-PEG/TP (dose of MnO2: 10 mg/kg, docetaxel: 10 mg/kg, cisplatin: 2.5 mg/kg). Body weights were monitored every 2 days for 4 weeks. Tumor progression was monitored using Maestro In-Vivo Fluorescence Imaging System every 2 weeks. The tissue and tumor slices were stained by HE, following standard protocol.

Results

Synthesis and characterization of H-MnO2-PEG

The H-MnO2-PEG/TP synthetic process is illustrated in Fig. 1a. Monodispersed silica nanoparticles were synthesized by hydrolyzation of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and then used immediately as the hard template. A uniform layer of mesoporous MnO2 was grown on the surface of the as-made silica nanoparticles by mixing them with KMnO4, which was reduced by unreacted organosilica existing on the prepared silica nanoparticles. The H-MnO2 nanoshells were obtained after incubating MnO2@SiO2 nanoparticles with a Na2CO3 solution to dissolve silica. To enhance their water solubility and physiological stability, H-MnO2 nanoshells were modified with PEG through a layer-by-layer (LBL) polymer-coating method. In this process, negatively-charged H-MnO2 nanoshells were coated with a cationic polymer PAH and then an anionic polymer PAA through electrostatic interaction. Amino-terminated PEG (NH2-PEG) was then conjugated to the surface of PAA-coated H-MnO2 nanoshells via amide formation, producing H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells. TP were simultaneously loaded into the hollow structure of the H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells, yielding H-MnO2-PEG/TP. SEM and TEM images revealed the spherical morphology and the hollow structure of the H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells (Fig. 1b, c). The hollow structure of the H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells was further confirmed by SEM-EDS (Fig. 1d, e). The change in zeta potential for the nanoparticles obtained at different steps of synthesis are shown in Fig. 1f. In the process of surface functionalization, the step wise altered spectrogram indicated successful LBL coating of polymers on the nanoparticles (Fig. 1g). No diffraction phenomena was observed according to XRD result (Fig. 1h), which indicates a low crystallinity structure of synthesized nanoparticles. Because of the structural defects, oxygen vacancies and low manganese of the low crystallinity structure synthesized at low temperature, it is easier to degradate in vivo [32, 33].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Synthesis and characterization of H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells: a step-by-step synthetic scheme of H-MnO2-PEG nanoparticles and subsequent dual-drug loading; b SEM images of MnO2, PEG@MnO2 and H-MnO2-PEG/TP; c TEM images of MnO2, PEG@MnO2 and H-MnO2-PEG/TP; d HRTEM for H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells; e SEM–EDS imaging and elemental mapping for H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells; f zeta potentials of nanoparticles obtained at different steps of fabrication; g FT-IR of free PEG, DDP, DDP@DOC@MnO2, DOC and MnO2; h XRD for H-MnO2-PEG

pH-dependent nanoparticle decomposition and drug behavior

It is well known that MnO2 is stable at neutral and alkaline pH but can decompose into Mn2+ at reduced pH [34]. Therefore, TEM images of H-MnO2-PEG incubated in PBS with different pH values (5.5 and 7.4) at different processing times were recorded (Fig. 2a). The morphology of H-MnO2-PEG nanocrystals showed no significant change at pH 7.4 after eight hours, indicating that H-MnO2-PEG nanocrystals were stable in neutral environments. However, due to the decomposition of MnO2 into Mn2+ ions, H-MnO2-PEG showed time-dependent degradation behavior in acidic solutions. The degradation rate was determined by decreasing the MnO2-characteristic absorption band (Fig. 2b), which appears to be stable at pH 7.4, but rapidly decreases at pH 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5, further demonstrating the ultra-sensitive pH-responsive degradation behavior of H-MnO2-PEG.

Fig. 2
figure 2

pH-dependent nanoparticle decomposition and drug behaviors of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells: a TEM images of H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells after incubation in buffers with different pH values (7.4 and 5.5) for various periods of time; b degradative behavior of H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells dispersed in solutions with different pH values (7.4, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5) determined by the absorbance of MnO2; c DOC- and DDP-loading weight ratios in H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells at different drug to MnO2 ratios; d UV–Vis spectra of free PEG, MnO2, DOC, DDP, H-MnO2-PEG, and H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells; e UV–Vis spectra of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells measuring drug release with increasing concentration; and f percentages of released DOC and DDP from H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells over time in the presence of 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at different pH values (7.4, 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5). Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (s.d.) (n = 3)

The H-MnO2-PEG with mesoporous shells were expected to have an efficient drug-loading ability. H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells were loaded with TP. Under ultrasonication, H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells were incubated and stirred with different concentrations of free DOC and DDP. Drug-loading capacities was evaluated by UV–Vis spectroscopy. At the feeding weight ratio of 1:1 (DOC:DDP), the drug loading capacity of the nanoshells was high: 75.53% (DOC:MnO2) and 71.75% (DDP:MnO2; Fig. 2c). DOC and DDP could also be simultaneously loaded into the hollow structure of H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells, obtaining dual drug co-loaded H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoparticles (Fig. 2d) and enhanced release with increasing concentration (Fig. 2e). Drug-release behaviors of DOC and DDP from H-MnO2-PEG/TP were studied in solutions with different pH values (Fig. 2f). Compared to the slow drug-release profiles of H-MnO2-PEG/TP at pH 7.4, the release speeds of both DOC and DDP were found to be much faster in mild acidic solutions at pH 6.5, 5.5, and 4.5, owing to the acidic-triggered decomposition of H-MnO2 nanocarriers into Mn2+ ions.

In vitro experiments with H-MnO2-PEG/TP

As described in previous research, the efficacy of TP is limited by the hypoxic TME of a solid tumor [35,36,37,38,39]. Considering the presence and concentration of endogenous H2O2 in most types of solid tumors is in the range of 100 μM [40], we then tested the ability of H-MnO2 to act as a catalyst and induce the decomposition of H2O2. An oxygen probe was used to measure the oxygen released into the solution after adding H2O2 (100 μM) with different concentrations of H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells. Without the addition of H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells, the dissolved O2 in the H2O2 solution was maintained at a low and stable level. H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells can effectively trigger the rapid generation of O2 from H2O2 in a MnO2 concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3b). Then, the in vitro efficacy of H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells as a multifunctional DDS was assessed by using CAL27 cells. As expected, no significant difference was observed in OSCC cells that were treated in different concentrations of H-MnO2-PEG (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Then, SCC7 and CAL27 cells were used to determine the IC50 of DOC and DDP. Cells were then treated with H-MnO2-PEG/TP in either an N2 or O2 environment, and the cell viabilities were determined by an MTT assay after incubation for 24 h (Fig. 3c). We used H-MnO2-PEG/TP for in vitro combination treatment. CAL27 cells incubated with H-MnO2-PEG/TP for different periods of time were then imaged by a confocal fluorescence microscope (Fig. 3d). Both DDP-coumarin (GFP) and DOC-rhodamine (RFP) fluorescence inside cells was significantly enhanced with increased incubation time. The colony-formation and -migration abilities were significantly decreased in CAL27 and SCC7 cells in the H-MnO2-PEG/TP group compared to the control group (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4a, b). Flow cytometry assays also confirmed that apoptosis was induced by H-MnO2-PEG/TP (Fig. 4c). Hypoxia is a key concern during the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [39], as with pulmonary metastasis of OSCC, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) has been associated with increased tumor resistance to therapeutic agents such as cisplatin. To further evaluate, the downregulation of HIF-1α induced by H-MnO2-PEG/TP was confirmed using western blot. (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 3
figure 3

In vitro experiments with H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells: a a scheme illustrating H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells in pH-responsive drug delivery; b the changes in O2 concentration in H2O2 solutions (100 μM) after various concentrations of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells were added; c after the treatment of different concentrations of DDP/DOC within 24 h, cell viability was assessed using an MTT assay where IC50 of DDP/DOC was measured in SCC7 and CAL27 cells (in vitro TP treatment was measured with and without H-MnO2-PEG nanoshells in N2 or O2 atmospheres in CAL27 cells); and d confocal microscopy images of CAL27 cells treated with H-MnO2-PEG/TP at different times points. Blue, green, and red represent DAPI, DDP, and DOC fluorescence, respectively. Date are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 5)

Fig. 4
figure 4

Antitumor function of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells in vitro: a Wound healing was performed with SCC7 and CAL27 cells after treatment with PBS, DOC, DDP, TP, and H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells; b colony formation assays were performed with SCC7 and CAL27 cells after treatment with PBS, DOC, DDP, TP, and H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells; c CAL27 cells were treated with indicated concentrations PBS, DDP, TP, and H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells for 48 h before staining with Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI), and the apoptotic rates were determined by flow cytometry; and d Western blotting showed decreased HIF-1α after treatment with indicated concentrations of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells for 48 h in the CAL27 and SCC7 cells

In vivo and ex vivo imaging with H-MnO2-PEG/TP

After confirmation of in vitro efficacy of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells, the effect of H-MnO2-PEG/TP in an OSCC subcutaneous bearing or pulmonary metastasis model was assessed. Mn2+ ions with five unpaired 3d electrons could decompose from MnO2 under the acidic conditions of the TME and is known as a T1-shortening agent in MRI [41]. In solutions at different pH (5.5 and 7.4), the H-MnO2-PEG/TP incubated in solutions at pH 5.5 showed a brighter T1-shortening image compared with the image at pH 7.4 (Fig. 5a). To demonstrate the use of H-MnO2 nanoshells for tumor-specific imaging, H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells were injected into tumor, and into muscle on the opposite side of the tumor in tumor-bearing mice for MRI (Fig. 5b). Caused by the acidic TME, the tumor showed significantly enhanced images in T1 signaling after injection of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells, whereas the muscle area with the same concentration of injected nanoparticles had reduced T1-signal enhancement (Fig. 5b). This phenomenon provides direct evidence that H-MnO2 has ultra-sensitive pH-responsive T1-MR contrast performance, which is particularly useful for tumor-specific imaging. After intravenous injection of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells (dose of MnO2: 10 mg/kg, docetaxel: 10 mg/kg, cisplatin: 2.5 mg/kg), in vivo fluorescence imaging was used to track the nanoparticles in CAL27 pulmonary metastasis Balb/c mice (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Semi-quantitative biodistribution data based on ex vivo imaging of major organs and tumors was collected two hours post injection, indicating a high tumor uptake of H-MnO2-PEG/TP (Fig. 5c). Notably, strong fluorescence was found in the kidneys of mice after H-MnO2-PEG/TP injection, illustrating a rapid renal clearance of the decomposed nanoshells. Previous research [42] used the tumor to normal organ uptake ratio (T/N ratio) to evaluate tumor targeting efficiency. Tumor uptake of TP alone (without the nanoparticle) was extremely low, indicating a low T/N ratio. Compared to the TP group, the T/N ratio increased significantly in mice treated with H-MnO2-PEG/TP.

Fig. 5
figure 5

In vivo and ex vivo imaging with H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells: a images from T1-weighted MRI of the H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells recorded using BioSpec 70/20 USR at different pH values (5.5 and 7.4). The transverse relativities (r1) were 8.091 and 0.091 mM−1 s−1 for H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells at pH 5.5 and 7.4, respectively. b Images from T1-MRI of CAL27 tumor-bearing mice before and after local injection of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells within normal and tumor subcutaneous tissues (three mice per group). Quantified T1-MR signals in muscle and tumor before and after injection with H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells. c Ex vivo fluorescence images of major organs and pulmonary metastasis tumors in Balb/c mice dissected from mice 2 h after injection (Ki, Lu and Li stands for kidney, lung, and liver, respectively). Semi-quantitative analysis of ex vivo fluorescence images in different organs. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 mice per group)

In vivo chemotherapy treatment with H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells

According to previous research [14, 30, 43], H-MnO2-PEG nanoparticles effectively increase lung metabolism. In vivo fluorescence imaging was used to evaluate tumor progression (Fig. 6a). At day 28, the tumors of all mice were collected. For tumors in mice treated with H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells, their growth was partially delayed. Furthermore, HE staining of tumor slices showed that the majority of tumor cells were severely damaged in the H-MnO2-PEG/TP-treated group (Fig. 6b). To evaluate the biosafety of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells, HE staining of kidney and liver slices were obtained 4 weeks after drug application (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Compared to the control group, no obvious cell fibrosis, necrosis, or hypertrophy was observed in the H-MnO2-PEG/TP-treated group.

Fig. 6
figure 6

In vivo combination chemotherapy of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells. a In vivo fluorescence images of mice with CAL27 pulmonary metastasis taken at different time points (six mice per group). b HE-stained tumor slices collected from mice after the various treatments indicated. c The percentage of TUNEL-positive cells were assessed in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded sections from tumors in each group. d The nuclei, blood vessels, and hypoxic areas stained with DAPI (blue), anti-HIF-1α antibody (green), and anti-CD31 antibody (red), respectively (three mice per group). Quantification of hypoxia and CD31 areas in tumors at different time points post injection of H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoparticles. p values in (e) were calculated using a student t-test (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05)

Terminal deoxynucleotide transferase dUTP notch end labeling (TUNEL) was used to detect apoptotic cells. H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells upregulated apoptosis in vivo (Fig. 6c). It is known that tumor cells are able to constitutively produce H2O2, whose level has been reported to be in the range of 10–100 μM in many types of solid tumors [40]. Therefore, H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoparticles may be able to trigger the decomposition of H2O2 generated by cancer cells, producing O2 in situ to relieve tumor hypoxia. The cell nuclei, blood vessels, and hypoxic areas were stained with 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-6-indolecarbamidine dihydrochloride (DAPI, blue), anti-CD31 antibody (red), and anti-HIF-1α antibody (green), respectively. Tumor slices collected at different time points in the H-MnO2-PEG/TP-treated group showed a reduction in green fluorescence compared to the control group, indicating that MnO2 accumulation in the tumor triggers H2O2 decomposition into O2, reducing tumor hypoxia (Fig. 6d).

Conclusion

In summary, H-MnO2-PEG/TP nanoshells act as a multifunctional theranostic platform, responding to and modulating TME and suppressing OSCC pulmonary metastasis by overcoming chemotherapy resistance. The ultrasensitive pH responsiveness of H-MnO2-PEG/TP enables tumor-specific MRI and efficient drug release in acidic TMEs. The relieved tumor hypoxia by MnO2-triggered decomposition of endogenous tumor H2O2 offers remarkable benefits. HIF-1α expression was significantly reduced in vitro and in vivo, which relieves hypoxia and attenuates angiogenesis. Phenomena mentioned before could synergize the efficacy of chemotherapy and reverse angiogenesis in the TME to favor anticancer treatment. With its inherent biodegradability, this H-MnO2-based theranostic nanoplatform may find significant potential in clinical translation by providing a method of combining chemotherapy with antiangiogenesis therapy.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References:

  1. Wang Y, et al. Hypoxia-active nanoparticles used in tumor theranostic. Int J Nanomed. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S196959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xinming J, et al. Role of hypoxia in cancer therapy by regulating the tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-1089-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Audrey L, et al. Impact of hypoxic tumor microenvironment and tumor cell plasticity on the expression of immune checkpoints. Cancer Lett. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.05.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wen-Yu P, et al. Localized sequence-specific release of a chemopreventive agent and an anticancer drug in a time-controllable manner to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Biomaterials. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guangbao Y, et al. Mesoporous silica nanorods intrinsically doped with photosensitizers as a multifunctional drug carrier for combination therapy of cancer. Nano Res. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-014-0558-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhandari V, et al. Molecular landmarks of tumor hypoxia across cancer types. Nature Genet. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0318-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrova V, et al. The hypoxic tumour microenvironment. Oncogenesis. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-017-0011-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiu L, et al. The role of hypoxia-inducible factors in tumor angiogenesis and cell metabolism. Genes Dis. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2016.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Minna A, et al. Molecular characterization of the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen WH, et al. Nanoparticle delivery of HIF1α siRNA combined with photodynamic therapy as a potential treatment strategy for head-and-neck cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2014.12.052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu Y, et al. Near-infrared light-activated cancer cell targeting and drug delivery with aptamer-modified nanostructures. Nano Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-015-0898-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qian C, et al. Anticancer therapy: light-activated hypoxia-responsive nanocarriers for enhanced anticancer therapy (adv. mater. 17/2016). Adv Mater. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201670115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Li Q, et al. A HMCuS@MnO2 nanocomplex responsive to multiple tumor environmental clues for photoacoustic/fluorescence/magnetic resonance trimodal imaging-guided and enhanced photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale. 2020;12(23):12508–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cao W, et al. MnO2@Ce6-loaded mesenchymal stem cells as an “oxygen-laden guided-missile” for the enhanced photodynamic therapy on lung cancer. Nanoscale. 2020;12(5):3090–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang CC, et al. Nanoparticle delivery of MnO2 and antiangiogenic therapy to overcome hypoxia-driven tumor escape and suppress hepatocellular carcinoma. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(40):44407–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Greene A, Hashemi J, Kang Y. Development of MnO2 hollow nanoparticles for potential drug delivery applications. Nanotechnology. 2021;32(2):025713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang M, et al. Manganese doped iron oxide theranostic nanoparticles for combined T1 magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(8):4650–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barandov A, et al. Membrane-permeable Mn(III) complexes for molecular magnetic resonance imaging of intracellular targets. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(17):5483–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Claudia RG, et al. Hybrid nanoparticles: design of hybrid MnO2-polymer-lipid nanoparticles with tunable oxygen generation rates and tumor accumulation for cancer treatment (adv. funct. mater. 12/2015). Adv Funct Mater. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201570087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu B, et al. Rapid decomposition and catalytic cascade nanoplatforms based on enzymes and Mn-etched dendritic mesoporous silicon for MRI-guided synergistic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(41):45772–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Shi J. Hollow-structured mesoporous materials: chemical synthesis, functionalization and applications. Adv Mater. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang M, et al. A multifunctional cascade bioreactor based on hollow-structured Cu2 MoS4 for synergetic cancer chemo-dynamic therapy/starvation therapy/phototherapy/immunotherapy with remarkably enhanced efficacy. Adv Mater. 2019;31(51):e1905271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang CZ, et al. GDF15 is a potential predictive biomarker for TPF induction chemotherapy and promotes tumorigenesis and progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(6):1215–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao TC, et al. Normal BMI predicts the survival benefits of inductive docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(9):2751–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hecht M, et al. Safety and efficacy of single cycle induction treatment with cisplatin/docetaxel/ durvalumab/tremelimumab in locally advanced HNSCC: first results of CheckRad-CD8. J Immunother Cancer. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Klinghammer K, et al. Cetuximab, fluorouracil and cisplatin with or without docetaxel for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CeFCiD): an open-label phase II randomised trial (AIO/IAG-KHT trial 1108). Eur J Cancer. 2019;122:53–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mendez E, et al. A phase I clinical trial of AZD1775 in combination with neoadjuvant weekly docetaxel and cisplatin before definitive therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(12):2740–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Merlano M. ASCO highlights podcast: head and neck cancers. ESMO Open. 2016;1(5):e000099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang G, et al. Hollow MnO2 as a tumor-microenvironment-responsive biodegradable nano-platform for combination therapy favoring antitumor immune responses. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen Q, et al. Intelligent albumin-MnO2 nanoparticles as pH-/H2O2-responsive dissociable nanocarriers to modulate tumor hypoxia for effective combination therapy. Adv Mater. 2016;28(33):7129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Peng H, et al. Folic acid-conjugated Silica-modified gold nanorods for X-ray/CT imaging-guided dual-mode radiation and photo-thermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin LS, et al. Simultaneous Fenton-like ion delivery and glutathione depletion by MnO2-based nanoagent to enhance chemodynamic therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018;57(18):4902–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang C, et al. Photosensitizer-modified MnO2 nanoparticles to enhance photodynamic treatment of abscesses and boost immune protection for treated mice. Small. 2020;16(28):e2000589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang X, et al. Iron oxide/manganese oxide co-loaded hybrid nanogels as pH-responsive magnetic resonance contrast agents. Biomaterials. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Takeo N, et al. Targeting the Vav3 oncogene enhances docetaxel-induced apoptosis through the inhibition of androgen receptor phosphorylation in LNCaP prostate cancer cells under chronic hypoxia. Mol Cancer. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-12-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Skvortsova I, et al. Effects of paclitaxel and docetaxel on EGFR-expressing human carcinoma cells under normoxic versus hypoxic conditions in vitro. J Chemother. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2004.16.4.372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J, et al. Ginsenoside Rg3 sensitizes hypoxic lung cancer cells to cisplatin via blocking of NF-κB mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stemness. Cancer Lett. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Youngjin H, et al. Mitochondrial fission causes cisplatin resistance under hypoxic conditions via ROS in ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0949-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Y, et al. Oroxylin A reverses hypoxia-induced cisplatin resistance through inhibiting HIF-1α mediated XPC transcription. Oncogene. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-01474-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Szatrowski TP, Nathan CF. Production of large amounts of hydrogen peroxide by human tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1991;51(3):794–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Platas-Iglesias C, et al. Transient versus static electron spin relaxation in Mn(2+) complexes relevant as MRI contrast agents. J Phys Chem A. 2016;120(32):6467–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Akhavan O, Ghaderi E. Graphene nanomesh promises extremely efficient in vivo photothermal therapy. Small. 2013;9(21):3593–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Liang R, et al. Oxygen-boosted immunogenic photodynamic therapy with gold nanocages@manganese dioxide to inhibit tumor growth and metastases. Biomaterials. 2018;177:149–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank ATCC for providing the cell lines. We thank the bioimaging facility at the Shanghai Institute of Precision Medicine for providing the Maestro In-Vivo Fluorescence Imaging System (CRi Inc., USA). Heartfelt thanks to Chentao Luo from Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Haizhu Kuang from the Third Affiliated Hospital (The Affiliated Luohu Hospital) of Shenzhen University and Xiaojun Chen from Shanghai Ninth people’s hospital for their help in revising the article.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 81972525, 81602370, and 81672660); the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (Grant Number 17SG18); the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant Number 2018BR41); and the Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (Grant Number 19XD1422300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LZ was responsible for the manuscript revision. XuC and XiC recorded and analyzed the in vivo fluorescence data. MQ performed animal MRI experiments. TZ and SL performed in vitro study. WJ, YH, and DZ analyzed the in vitro data. MY conducted the graphical abstract. YP instructed the nanoparticle synthesis. ZZ is the first author who performed all the data collection, analysis, and in vitro experimentation and responsible for the conception and critical revision of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dong-wang Zhu, Yi-chuan Pang or Lai-ping Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

SPF BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Shanghai Experimental Animal Center (Shanghai, China) and placed in the SPF facility of the Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. All laboratory procedures were approved by the laboratory animal care and use committee of the hospital.

Consent for publication

No individual person’s data were included in this research.

Competing interests

Authors declare there are no competing interests, financial and non-financial, in relation to the work described.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Cell viability of OSCC under different concentrations of H-MnO2-PEG.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

The in vivo fluorescence imaging of H-MnO2-PEG/TP in pulmonary metastasis Balb/c mice.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

HE staining of kidney and liver slices.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Zh., Liang, Sy., Zhao, Tc. et al. Overcoming chemotherapy resistance using pH-sensitive hollow MnO2 nanoshells that target the hypoxic tumor microenvironment of metastasized oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Nanobiotechnol 19, 157 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00901-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00901-9

Keywords