Skip to main content
Download PDF

Catalytically active gold clusters with atomic precision for noninvasive early intervention of neurotrauma

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 19, Article number: 319 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Neurotrauma is a worldwide public health problem which can be divided into primary and secondary damge. The primary damge is caused by external forces and triggers the overproduction of peroxides and superoxides, leading to long-lasting secondary damage including oxidative stress, wound infection and immunological reactions. The emerging catalysts have shown great potential in the treatment of brain injury and neurogenic inflammation, but are limited to biosafety issues and delivery efficiency.

Results

Herein, we proposed the noninvasive delivery route to brain trauma by employing highly active gold clusters with enzyme-like activity to achieve the early intervention. The decomposition rate to H2O2 of the ultrasmall gold clusters is 10 times that of glassy carbon (GC) electrodes, indicating excellent catalytic activity. The gold clusters can relieve the oxidative stress and decrease the excessive O2·− and H2O2 both in vitro and in vivo. Besides, gold clusters can accelerate the wound healing of brain trauma and alleviate inflammation via inhibiting the activation of astrocytes and microglia through noninvasive adminstration. decrease the peroxide and superoxide of brain tissue.

Conclusions

Present work shows noninvasive treatment is a promising route for early intervention of brain trauma.

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has led to globally death and disability with high mobility [1,2,3] and caused heavily economic burden as a serious public health issue [4,5,6]. The primary brain damage can trigger a cascade of molecular and biochemical events, leading to long-lasting secondary damage including oxidative stress, wound infection and chronic neurodegenerative diseases [1, 7,8,9]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) can oxidatively impair biomacromolecules in vivo and play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of TBI including hydroxyl radical (OH·), superoxide anion radicals (O2·−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nitric oxide radicals (NO·) and peroxynitrite (ONOO−) [1, 7, 8, 10, 11]. Previous studies have confirmed that TBI can be improved via balancing oxidation reduction by elimination of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). Thus, antioxidative biocatalysts with catalase-like (CAT-like), superoxide dismutase-like (SOD-like), peroxidase (POD-like) and glutathione peroxidase-like (GPx-like) activities and good stability show great potential in the treatment and diagnosis of TBI through catalytically scavenging the RONS [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].

Earlier studies have shed light on the enzyme-like activities of nanozymes. Carbogenic and gold-based nanozymes exhibited exceeding activity against oxidative stress and neuroinflammation [11, 13, 19, 21, 22]. Nanozymes composed of metals, metallic oxide and alloys like Pt, Pd, Cr, V and Ce possess high enzymatic activities, beneficial for TBI treatment [12, 14, 15, 18, 23, 24]. Especially, the ceria nanozymes showed excellent SOD-like and CAT-like catalytic activities on scavenging RONS via redox cycle between Ce4+ and Ce3+ [12, 18, 25]. Compared with traditional nanozymes, the gold clusters show controllable modulation in catalytic activity and selectivity, which can be improved by increasing the atomic utilization efficiency at atomic levels as well as atomic engineering via atom manipulation [26]. Unlike traditional nanozyme, bioactive gold clusters exhibit the high efficient renal clearance and negligible toxicity even at very high injected dose (500 mg/kg) [24, 25, 27]. Moreover, due to ultrasmall size, the gold clusters can enter cell or injury site easily, resulting in high efficient treatment [26, 28]. Gold clusters possess activities like SOD, CAT and GPx enzymes, performing significant antioxidant effects in TBI treatment [26, 28,29,30,31]. Though nanotechnologies for TBI diagnosis and monitoring were employed to promote the activity and utilization of nanozymatic biocatalysts like atom engineering, surface modification, and size modulation [32,33,34], it remains painless and chanllenged for clinical translation [12, 15, 29,30,31, 35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Different from the intravenous injection, the noninvasive diagnosis and stimulation for TBI can achieve rapid and painless treatment, worthy of considering to promote recovery and minimize disability. However, the noninvasive methods for TBI treatment are still highly challenged.

Herein, we investigated a noninvasive administration to treat brain trauma at the early stage with gold clusters of well-defined structure and high catalytic selectively. Electrochemical assay unraveled their high catalytic activities toward hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and further revealed their excellent activity toward the reduction of O2 and H2O2. Furthermore, noninvasive administration of the gold clusters distinctly improved the wound healing on TBI mice and Morris water maze tests further confirmed significant recovery on learning ability and spatial memory with Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 treatment. Ex vivo assay further proved the ability of gold clusters on mitigating oxidative stress and inhibiting neuroinflammation. Together with the results of acceptable biocompatibility, gold clusters showed promising potential as noninvasive therapeutics against TBI.

Results and discussion

The Au25 cluster is composed of 13 gold atoms as the core and 6 Au2(SG)3 as the outer shell. The catalytically active sites of the cluster are mainly located on the surface. Single atom Cu or Cd replaces the Au in one of the S-Au-S, indicative of synthesizing Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1, respectively. After single atom Cu and Cd substitution, the valence electron structure of the cluster is altered, thereby changing the catalytic performance of the cluster [23]. Figure 1a illustrated the effects of MPA-protected Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in brain trauma via catalytic systems. TEM images illustrated the homogenous distribution of the clusters at about 2 nm (Fig. 1b, c), similar with L-NIBC-coated gold clusters [46]. The hydrodynamic sizes determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) were 1.98, 1.92 and 2.58 nm for Au25, Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1, respectively, a little larger than the statistical diameter of TEM. After incubation in water for 24 and 48 h, the size of clusters changed negligibly, revealing the favorable stability (Fig. 1d, e). In addition, the zeta potentials of all clusters were around − 35 mV (Fig. 1f), consistent with our previous work [26, 47]. The concentration Cd and Cu elements in Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters account for 3% and 5% of the total metal as determined by an accurate inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), respectively, further confirming the single-atom substitution in Au25 clusters (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed that the dominant state of Au in the clusters is the Au (0) state, and the peaks of Cu 2p3/2 (931.8 eV) and Cd 3d5/2 (404.8 eV) are on the reducing side of Cu (0) (id. =932.2 eV) and Cd (0) (id. =405.3 eV), respectively, indicating the successful single-atom substitution in Au25 clusters (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). These results display the ultrasmall size and good colloid stability of clusters, manifesting the potential in biological applications.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Structural characterization of Au25 clusters. a Schematic illustration of noninvasive TBI treatment with gold clusters via a catalytic system. b TEM image of MPA-protected Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters. Scale bar: 20 nm. c Size distribution of MPA-protected Au25 nanocluster measured by analyzing 100 nanodots from TEM images. d Hydrodynamic diameters of MPA-protected Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 in PBS buffer, and the mean sizes of Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 were 1.98, 1.92 and 2.58 nm respectively. e Stability of Au25 nanocluster in H2O after 24 and 48 h at room temperature, and the slightly increase of hydrodynamic diameter revealed satisfying stability. Additionally, the zeta potentials of the clusters f were around -35 mV, indicative of good colloid stability (n=3 independent experiments, data are presented as mean ± SD)

Full size image

To evaluate the electrocatalytic activities of the Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters, a standard three-electrode system were employed to conduct the electrocatalytic activities toward HER and OER [48,49,50]. Figure 2a shows cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of glassy carbon (GC) electrodes modified with as prepared Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters. Compared with a blank GC electrode, clusters achieve larger negative current density toward HER (Fig. 2a), which were further verified by linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) measurement (Fig. 2b). As shown in Fig. 2c, Au24Cu1 clusters demonstrated a higher efficiency at the potential of −0.4585 V in catalysis, significantly better than Au25(SC12H25)18 [8] and PtCo cluster [10]. OER exhibits similar results with HER that all clusters improved the performance of the electrochemical reaction (Fig. 2d, f). Au24Cd1 shows the lowest current onset on CV curves at 1.3 V, followed by Au24Cu1 and Au25, which is a little different from the results of HER. Besides, Au24Cd1 can reach 0.023 mA/cm2 at a potential of 1.3254 V, while that of NiFe clusters is less than 0.01 mA/cm2, indicating better superiority to NiFe cluster [11]. The results of HER and OER further demonstrated that the catalytic performance were altered by the valence electron structure change via different single-atom substitution [23].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Catalytic performance for overall water splitting. a CVs of GC electrode modified with as-prepared Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in 0.5 M H2SO4. Scanning rate: 0.010 V s−1. b Linear sweep HER voltammograms for Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters. Scanning rate: 0.001 V s−1. c Current density of different clusters at the potential of −0.4585 V toward the activity of HER. d CVs of GC electrode modified with as-prepared Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in 1 M KOH. Scanning rate: 0.10 V s−1. e Linear sweep OER voltammograms for Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters. Scanning rate: 0.005 V s−1. f Current density of different clusters at the potential of 1.3244 V toward the activity of OER

Full size image

We also evaluated the in vitro catalytic activities of Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in H2O2 reduction and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) [51, 52]. As shown in Fig. 3a, the current density of the GC electrode modified by Au24Cu1 clusters can reach -1.48 mA/cm−2 at a potential of -0.8 V, a little higher than Pt12 clusters [18]. The results were further verified by LSV measurement (Fig. 3b), demonstrating that all clusters can enhance the electrocatalytic activity and Au24Cu1 clusters exhibit the best activity for ORR among all clusters. For the reduction of H2O2, only imperceptible reduction current was observed in the presence of H2O2 on the GC electrode, consistent with previous works [51]. Compared with the GC electrode at -0.8 V, Au24Cu1 clusters show the current destiny of -1.74 mA/cm−2, and Au24Cd1 clusters exhibit that of -1.56 mA/cm−2 (Fig. 3d,  e), slightly better than noble metal (Ag, Pd, Au, Pt) on Graphene/ZnO multihybrid nanoarchitectures [19]. Figure 3c, f quantitatively demonstrate the improvement of all clusters on O2 and H2O2 reduction, indicating excellent catalytic activities. Au24Cu1 presented the predominance toward both reactions, and Au24Cd1 and Au25 followed toward H2O2 and O2 reduction, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Catalytic activities of the Au25 clusters. a CVs of GC electrode modified with as-prepared Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in O2-saturated 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4). Scanning rate: 0.050 V s−1. b LSV of GC electrode modified with as-prepared Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in O2-saturated 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4). Scanning rate: 0.005 V s−1. c Compared the ORR activities of Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters at the potential of −0.8 V. d CVs of GC electrode modified with as-prepared Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in the presence of 9.8 mM H2O2 in N2-saturated 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4). Scanning rate: 0.050 V s−1. e LSV of GC electrode modified with as-prepared Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters in the presence of 9.8 mM H2O2 in N2-saturated 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4). Scanning rate: 0.010 V s−1. Rotation rate: 1600 rpm. f Compared the H2O2 scavenging activities of clusters at the potential of -0.8 V

Full size image

Since the remarkable catalytic activities inspired us to investigate their biological responses in cells and brain-injured mice, we conducted biological inspections to evaluate their activities in vitro and in vivo. Combined with our previous work [26], Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters conferred catalytic selectivity and enzyme-like activities, beneficial to reduce the oxidative stress induced by brain injury (Fig. 4a). Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 exihibit good biocompatibility at the concentration of 50 µg/mL to different neural cell lines (HT22, BV2 and MA-c) determined by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays (Additional file 1: Fig. S3), presenting favorable metabolic properties [26].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Catalytic mechanism and in vitro evaluation of the clusters. a Schematic illustration of the catalytic mechanism and selectivity of the clusters. Cu and Cd as single active sites exhibit superiorities against reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) respectively, resulting in free radical scavenging and inspire their use in brain injury. b Fluorescence images of ROS (green) and O2·− (red) levels induced by 100 µM H2O2 with or without clusters treatment, illustrating the high activity of scavenging ROS of the clusters. c HT22 cell viability under treatment of H2O2 and treated with or without the clusters (n = 5 per group, data are presented as mean ± SD), which showed the ability of the clusters to rescue the lethality induce by H2O2. d, e Quantitative analysis of Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 against O2·− and ROS, respectively (n = 3 independent experiments, data are presented as mean ± SD). Data are analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey test (adjusted p values are shown, *p< 0.05, ***p< 0.001, compared with the Con group)

Full size image

To investigate the biological activity of clusters, imaging of H2O2-treated neuron cells with or without Au25, Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters was obtained (Fig. 4b). The H2O2 stimulation can significantly elevates signals, indicating the presence of excessive amount of ROS and O2·− [53]. All clusters can decrease the ROS and O2·− signals, while Au24Cd1 shows the best clearance efficiency. Meanwhile, Au24Cu1 displays better clearance capability against ROS than Au25 and Au24Cd1, suggesting higher selectivity for ROS. The related quantification further confirmed the remarkable biological catalytic activity and laying the groundwork for in vivo utilization (Fig. 4d, e). In addition, H2O2 induces decreases in cell viability (∼78%) due to oxidative stress and inflammation [54], while Au25, Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters can rescue cell viability back to 90%, indicative of great potential to protect nerves and lower the lethality from H2O2-induced cytotoxicity (Fig. 4c). All the in vitro results manifest good catalytic activities of Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters on ROS scavenging, revealing their potential as biocatalysts and suggesting further investigation in vivo.

The primary injuries triggers a casade of biochemical reactions, leading to the long-lasting sencondary injuries. The secondary brain injuries generate harmful molecules and cytokines, leading to acute or chronic neuronal damage, memory impairment and inflammation. Traditional intravenous administration have shown great poteintial in brain diseases, but toxicity remains a major concern for clinical translation [15, 28]. Therefore, the above in vitro preliminary results inspired us to treat TBI noninvasively and it is reasonable to develop a noninvasive routine to treat TBI at the early stage. The clusters were dropped in the injured area of TBI mice. The wound size was significantly reduced to healthy levels after clusters treatment, whereas the untreated mice only showed a partial recovery (Fig. 5a, b). We further evaluated the oxidative stress-related indicators, including SOD, GSH/GSSG, MDA, and H2O2 in TBI mice [28, 55]. Brain injuries generate excessive ROS in tissues, consume lots of SOD and GSH, and produce harmful lipid peroxidation (Fig. 5c–f). SOD and GSH/GSSG are sharply decreased on day 7 post-injury and slightly increased on day 14 post-injury, and MDA and H2O2 are relatively serious on day 7 post-injury and a little alleviated on day 14 post-injury for TBI groups, indicating severe oxidative stress after brain injuries. However, clusters can effectively decrease the MDA and H2O2 levels, suggesting the ROS elimination of clusters, and can siginificantly recovered the SOD and GSH/GSSG levels, maintaining the balance of ROS levels.

Fig. 5
figure 5

In vivo investigation of the clusters. a Wound healing processes over time of TBI mice with and without treatment of clusters, and b showed wound remaining percentage over time. The Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 showed favorable therapeutic effect against TBI. c–f Indicators for oxidative stress, including SOD, GSH/GSSG, MDA, and H2O2, of TBI mice with or without treatment of clusters on days 7 and 14 post intervention (n = 3 per group). The clusters can rescue the level of SOD and GSH/GSSG decreased by TBI, and decrease the MDA and H2O2, indicative of alleviating the oxidative stress in vivo. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and compared with the Con groups, analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey test (adjusted p values are shown, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.005)

Full size image

Moreover, the behavior tests were conducted to evaluate the spatial learning and memory abilities by Morris water maze (Fig. 6). All mice were trained to learn to search for the platform during the acquisition phase on days 13–17 and 26–30 including the total distance travelled and the latency to the hidden platform. Compared with TBI groups, both travel distance and latency to platform gradually decrease with training after clusters treatment (Fig. 6c, d), indicating that clusters can effectively improve the motor function following brain injury. Au24Cu1 or Au24Cd1 clusters show better results than Au25, indicating the efficiency enhancement by Cu and Cd single-atom substitution. Figure 6e, f show that platform crossings and average distance obviously decrease in TBI group and can almost return back to normal levels with cluters treatment after injury. These facts imply that clusters can effectively improve the learning ability and spatial memory of mice with TBI-induced brain injury.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Morris water maze tests. a Schematic illustration of the apparatus. b Paths of tested mice to the platform treated with or without the clusters. c Distance traveled to the hidden platform, and d latency to locate and rest on the hidden platform of the tested mice on days 13–17 and 26–30. The number of platform crossings (e) and average distance to locate the platform of the tested mice recorded on day 17 and 30. Results illustrated that the clusters especially the Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 promoting the recovery of neuronal cognition and the spatial learning and memory abilities of TBI mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and compared with the Con groups, analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey test (adjusted p values are shown, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.005)

Full size image

Since brain injuries can lead to chronic inflammation, we were examined their therapeutic effects on the neuroinflammation. Figure 7a demonstrates the schematic illustration for the TBI-associated inflammatory responses and relevant modulation with the clusters [1, 8]. IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α are all upregulated after injury, revealing strong local inflammation. Au25 only shows minor downregulation toward the three inflammatory factors, while Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 exhibit exceptional efficiency to reduce their levels, manifesting that substitution of Cu and Cd atom has great influence on the catalytic activity (Fig. 7b, c). Au24Cu1 performs better than Au24Cd1 in downregulating overexpressed TNF-α, whereas Au24Cd1 behaves better in mediating IL-1β, IL-6, implying catalytic selectivity to different inflammatory cytokines. ELISA kits further verified the immunoblot results that Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 are superior to Au25 on inhibiting inflammatory factors in brain tissues including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α (Fig. 7d, f). Additionally, the immuno histochemical assay illustrated the conspicuous anti-inflammation effect of Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 against IL-6 (Fig. 7 h), consistent with quantitative results in Fig. 7 g. Furthermore, significant differences on the pathological slices can be seen that the TBI group exhibited swelling of nerve cells and obvious infiltration of inflammatory cells; while the groups treated with clusters especially the Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 recovered to almost normal (Fig. 7i). These results demonstrated that the clusters especially Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 can accelerate the wound healing of traumatically injured brain by inhibiting the inflammatory factors.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Inflammation levels in brain tissues. a Schematic illustration of catalytic activity on oxidative stress and inflammatory responses of the clusters. Expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6 (b), and TNF-α (c) in the brain tissues on day 30 post TBI with or without clusters (n =3 per group) were analyzed using western blotting. The Au24Cd1 showed superiority on downregulating the IL-1β and IL-6, while the Au24Cu1 had better effect toward TNF-α. d–f ELISA analysis of inflammatory factors on days 7 and 14 post TBI with or without treatment of clusters (n = 3 per group) further confirmed the abilities of the Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 on regulating inflammatory factors. All the samples were derived from the same experiment and blots were processed in parallel. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and compared with the control groups. g Quantitative analysis of the positive cell numbers in injured cortex with or without nanocluster treatment (n=3 per group). Analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey test and compared with the Con groups. h The immunohistochemical assay illustrated the conspicuous effect of Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 against IL-6. i The pathological slices showed that the TBI group exhibiting apoptotic and swollen nerve cells and infiltration of inflammatory cells, while the groups treated with clusters especially the Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 recovered to almost normal. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and compared with the Con groups, analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey test (adjusted p values are shown, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.005, ***p< 0.001)

Full size image

Brain injuries can also mediate the recruitment of microglia and astrocytes in the injuried areas, which are the key cellular mediators of TBI after brain injury [1]. As shown in Fig. 8a, lots of astrocytes are produced and activated along with inflammatory cytokines, indicating strong local inflammation. The Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters can inhibit the activation of astrocytes and remarkably reduce the overexpression of IL-1β and IL-6. The relative quantification further exhibited the significant effect of Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters (Fig. 8b–d). Immune response associated IL-1β and IL-6 can be alleviated by Au24Cd1, while Au24Cu1 shows better effect on reducing TNF-α, indicating their catalytic selectivity and potential selectivity towards the treatment of neuroinflammation. Also, it is noted that the performance of mice in Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 groups is superior to that in Au25 groups, indicating that Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters possess a better anti-inflammation property by efficiently eliminating excessive free radicals and inhibiting neuroglia activation. Additionally, hematology analysis and tissue toxicology analysis showed no toxicity in the long term, suggesting the good biological safety of clusters (Additional file 1: Figs. S4–S6).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Staining characterization of inflammation levels. a Immunofluorescence staining of IL-6, IL-1β and astrocytes (GFAP) in injured cortex 30 days post TBI with or without nanocluster treatment. b–d Quantitative analysis of the expression IL-6, IL-1β and GFAP with positive cells in the injured cortex with or without nanocluster treatment (n=3 per group). The Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 presented appealing effects of inhibiting the activation of astrocyte and the expression of IL-6 and IL-1β, which revealed excellent capability of the Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 on anti-neuroinflammation and further verified the effect of the clusters against TBI. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and compared with the Con groups, analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey test (adjusted p values are shown, *p< 0.05, **p< 0.005, ***p< 0.001)

Full size image

The present work demonstrated the high catalytic activity of Au24Cd1 and Au24Cu1 clusters and their availability as TBI therapeutics. Unlike traditional nanozymes, gold clusters overcomed the water insolubility and exhibited the well-defined structure at the atomic level with ultrasmall size and good biocompatibility. Catalytic activity and selectivity of clusters can be further increased and availability as TBI therapeutics can also be improved via single ation substitution. Moreover, since noninvasive administration can directly and rapidly release the biocatalysts into the damaged area, it shows promissing potential for TBI treatment, eliminating the RNOS and inhibiting subsequent neuroinflammation [15, 26, 56, 57]. Necessarily, exploiting new biocatalysts with high catalytic activities and favorable biocompatibility, and developing new delivery modes for the biocatalysts for the noninvasive intervention of TBI remain constant challenges in this field [15, 43]. As more biocatalysts with distinguished catalytic activities against oxidative stress are under development [20, 58], there will be more potential therapeutics in the use of noninvasive intervention against TBI.

Conclusions

In summary, we have reported a noninvasive therapeutic to treat brain trauma at the early stage with gold clusters of well-defined structure and high catalytic selectively. Compared with reported nanozymes, the gold clusters showed higher catalytic activities toward water splitting and reduction of O2 and H2O2 by introducing the Cu or Cd catalytic active site. The biological results reveal that clusters can modulate the oxidative stress and further alleviate neuroinflammation by noninvasive adminstration. Besides, these results conclude that Au24Cd1 preferentially decreases IL-1β and IL-6, while Au24Cu1 shows the tendency to decrease TNF-α, indicating their different selectivity for alleviating neuroinflammation. Behaviors and histology illustrated their favorable effects against TBI after noninvasive administration. In conclusion, our work shows the great potential of noninvasive early intervention for the treatment of TBI with enzymatic biocatalysts.

Materials and methods

Materials and reagents

All chemicals and reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. Gold chloride (HAuCl4·3H2O) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Copper nitrate (Cu(NO3)2), Cadmium nitrate (Cd(NO3)2), 3-Mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), Sodium borohydride (NaBH4), Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were purchased from Aladdin. Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ*cm) was used for all the experiments. Kits and fluorescent probes were purchased from commercial sources and used as per the instructions.

Materials preparation, characterization and catalytic activities

The MPA-protected Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters were prepared as per the previous reports [26, 59, 60]. Briefly, HAuCl4 (aqueous, 20 mM, 0.25 mL) and MPA (aqueous, 5 mM, 2 mL) were added to water (2.35 mL) and stirred for 5 min at room temperature. Then, NaOH solution (aqueous, 1 M, 0.3 mL) was added to the reaction mixture, followed by the addition of 0.1 mL of NaBH4 (43 mg of NaBH4 powder in 10 mL of 0.2 M NaOH solution). Au25MPA18 was collected after the final reaction mixture stirred at room temperature for 3 h in the dark and aged at 4 °C for 12 h. The Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 were synthesized based on the same method, except the Au atoms in HAuCl4 (20 mM, 0.25 mL) were replaced by various nitrate metal ions (Cu2+, Cd2+) at a 4% molar ratio. Ultrafiltration tubes of 3 and 10 K at 3500 rpm/min were used for ultrafiltration to remove smaller organic ligands and larger-sized clusters, and lyophilization was used to collect the purified product for further test and investigation.

A JEM-2100 F electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) was employed to acquire transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images. A Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (UK) was employed to measure dynamic light scattering (DLS) to test the hydrodynamic size and determine the zeta potential of clusters.

The XPS spectrum of the metal elements was performed using ESCALAB Xi+ spectrometer, with a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All XPS spectra are processed with XPSPEAK41 software and corrected with the peak of C1s (standard: 428.8 eV). ICP-MS (Agilent, US) was used to determine the content of each metal element in the clusters.

The clusters were deposited onto the surface of glassy carbon (GC) electrodes for electrochemical assay [14, 40]. Briefly, as-prepared MPA-protected Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 clusters (20 µL, 0.5 mg/mL) were deposited onto the surface of GC electrodes and dried naturally, then Nafion solution (3 µL) was dropped onto the surface of GC electrodes and dried, the modified electrodes were used for catalytic activity tests.

Cyclic Voltammetry (CV, scan rate: HER, 10 mV s−1; OER, 100 mV s−1) and Linear Sweep Voltammetry (LSV, scan rate: HER, 1 mV s−1; OER, 5 mV s−1) measurements were taken electrochemical analyzer, CHI760E, Shanghai) to evaluate the performance of the clusters modified electrodes for HER and OER. HER was carried out in 0.5 M H2SO4, and a graphite rod and a saturated calomel electrode were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. OER was carried out in 1 M KOH, and a platinum wire and an Ag/AgCl electrode were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively.

CV (scan rate: 50 mV s−1) and LSV (scan rate: 5 mV s−1) measurements were taken (electrochemical analyzer, CHI760E, Shanghai) to evaluate the catalytic activities for O2 and H2O2 reduction. A three-electrode cell was adopted for both O2 and H2O2 reduction, a platinum wire and a saturated calomel electrode were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) was carried out in O2-saturated in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4), and the H2O2 reduction was performed in the presence of 9.8 mM H2O2 in N2-saturated 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4).

In vitro evaluation of the catalytic activities

Cytotoxicity assay. mouse hippocampal neuronal cell line (HT22) (3 × 103), mouse microglia (BV2) (4 × 103), and mouse astrocytes (MA-c) (4 × 103) were seeded in 96-well plates filled in 100 µL medium with 0.01 M PBS (Gibco) at the border overnight. The culture medium was replaced by different doses of Au25, Au24Cu1, or Au24Cd1 dissolved in the DMEM, and then cells were incubated for another 24 h. Wells were washed with 0.01 M PBS once, and the medium were replaced by fresh culture medium with serum-free DMEM. Cell survival was analyzed using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazol)-2,5-diphenyl-2 H tetrazolium bromide, Beyotime) of 5 mg/mL for 2.5 h and detected at optical density (OD) 490 nm.

Cell viability and Immunofluorescence. HT22 was used in all the cellular experiments. Cells were seeded into the 96-well plates and grew in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After being stimulated with 100 µM H2O2 for 6 h, the culture medium was replaced by Au25, Au24Cu1 and Au24Cd1 dissolved in the DMEM at different doses, and then cells were incubated for another 24 h. HT22 cells (1 × 105 cells per well) were seeded in 6-well plates for 12 h and stimulated with 100 µM H2O2 for 6 h before being treated with the clusters (12 ng/µL). Cell survival was determined at the MTT concentration of 5 mg/mL for 2.5 h and detected at optical density (OD) 490 nm. Fluorescent staining was carried out to evaluate the intracellular oxidative stress levels with different probes such as DHE for O2·− and DCFH-DA for ROS, and cell images were captured by a fluorescence microscope.

In vivo treatment and behavioral experiment

TBI models: C57BL/6 mice at 21–23 g were employed to establish TBI models using an electromagnetically CCI injury device (eCCI-6.3, Custom Design & Fabrication, Inc), with an impactor of 5 m/s velocity, 0.61 mm depth, 150 ms duration, and 20º angle of dura mater on the vertical axis. The mice were divided into control, TBI, TBI+Au25, TBI+Au24Cu1, and TBI+ Au24Cd1 group (n = 15) randomly. All mice were anesthetized with 10 % chloral hydrate (10 mg/kg) and the scalp was cut before placed on the stereotaxic frame. The craniotomy was carried out by drilling the skull in a circle of 2 mm in diameter. The scalp was sewn together carefully, and the clusters were added to the wound of TBI mice at a concentration of 50 mg/kg. The healing process was recorded photographically and the wound remaining was calculated after treatment.

Oxidative stress level: Brain tissues were taken out on days 7 and 14 post-treatment, then homogenized in 0.9% physiological saline and analyzed for SOD, GSH/GSSG, MDA, and H2O2 using commercially available kits. All testing methods are carried out as per the instructions (Beyotime).

Morris water maze tests: Morris water maze (MWM) was conducted on days 13–17 and 26–30 post-treatment as described in the previously reported literature [12, 61, 62]. Briefly, the water maze was divided into four quadrants, and the platform was set in the center of quadrant I. Before spatial learning, visual discrimination learning was performed to determine whether the vision of mice was normal. In this procedure, each animal performed one trial where the platform was placed above the water to determine whether the vision of mice was normal. Animal with the visual problem would be excluded in the Morris water maze test. Each mouse was put into the pool to be trained and learned to search for the platform under the water in the order of quadrant II, III, IV and I with an inter-trial interval (ITI) of 60 min at almost the same time of each day for five days. The test was carried out without the platform on the fifth day, and each mouse was put into the pool at quadrant II and allowed for 60 s to track them.

Ex vivo verification

Western Blotting: The total protein in the brain tissue was extracted and the content of IL-1β (1:1000), IL-6 (1:1000) and TNF-α (1:1000) was analyzed. SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was performed before transferring to the membrane. Immune responses of the specific antibodies were carried out and the images were captured with autoradiography. All antibodies were purchased from Abcam.

ELISA analysis: Inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α were determined by ELISA kits (Abcam, ab100712, ab197742, ab208348, respectively), and the assays were performed as per the instructions provided by the manufacture.

Tissue staining: Brain tissues were taken out at 30 days post-injury and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Immunofluorescent staining was performed with primary antibodies including anti-GFAP, IL-6, IL-1β antibodies as per the instructions of (Abcam). Then the slices were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488/594-conjugated goat secondary antibody for 1-1.5 h at room temperature under dark and counterstained with DAPI. Immunohistochemical staining for IL-6 and mice brain tissue was performed according to the instructions (Proteintech).

Toxicological studies: The biosafety of clusters was measured on male C57BL/6J mice at 7-8 weeks (21-23 g). Mice were treated with 200 µL of clusters at a dose of 50 mg/kg every other day. Hematology and blood biochemical indicators were tested on day 30. The blood sample was obtained from the retroorbital sinus and stored in a test tube containing K2EDTA for testing. The blood sample used for biochemical analysis was allowed to stand for 30 min, and then centrifuged twice at 3500 rpm for 15 min each time, the supernatant was collected and tested. The main organs of the mice were collected and fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, and mounted on a glass slide (4 μm coronal section). The slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to observe the toxicity of clusters in major organs, including the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney and testis.

Statistic methods

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM). For multiple comparisons, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using the SPSS 22 software to assess difference in means among groups and compared with the Con and TBI groups, analyzed by ANOVA.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

OH·:

Hydroxyl radical

O2 ·− :

Superoxide anion radicals

H2O2 :

Hydrogen peroxide

RNS:

Reactive nitrogen species

NO·:

Nitric oxide radicals

ONOO− :

Peroxynitrite

RONS:

Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species

CAT:

catalase

SOD:

superoxide dismutase

POD:

peroxidase

GPx:

glutathione peroxidase

HER:

hydrogen evolution reaction

OER:

oxygen evolution reaction

DLS:

dynamic light scattering

GC:

glassy carbon

CV:

Cyclic Voltammetry

LSV:

Linear Sweep Voltammetry

ORR:

Oxygen reduction reaction

ICP-MS:

Inductively coupled plasma massspectrometry

XPS:

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

ALB:

Albumin

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

TP:

Total protein

CREA:

Creatinine

TB:

Total bilirubin

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

WBC:

White blood cells

RBC:

Red blood cell

HCT:

Hematocrit

MCV:

Mean corpuscular volume

HGB:

Hemoglobin

PLT:

Platelets

MCH:

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin

MCHC:

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

References

  1. Simon DW, McGeachy MJ, Bayır H, Clark RS, Loane DJ, Kochanek PM. The far-reaching scope of neuroinflammation after traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(3):171–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang JY, Gao GY, Feng JF, Mao Q, Chen LG, Yang XF, Liu JF, Wang YH, Qiu BH, Huang XJ. Traumatic brain injury in China. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(3):286–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang XD, Wang H, Antaris AL, Li L, Diao S, Ma R, Nguyen A, Hong G, Ma Z, Wang J, et al. Traumatic brain injury imaging in the second near-infrared window with a molecular fluorophore. Adv Mater. 2016;28(32):6872–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG. Global burden of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(1):24–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. James SL, Theadom A, Ellenbogen RG, Bannick MS, Montjoy-Venning W, Lucchesi LR, Abbasi N, Abdulkader R, Abraha HN, Adsuar JC. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(1):56–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolias AG, Rubiano AM, Figaji A, Servadei F, Hutchinson PJ. Traumatic brain injury: global collaboration for a global challenge. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(2):136–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khatri N, Thakur M, Pareek V, Kumar S, Sharma S, Datusalia AK. Oxidative stress: major threat in traumatic brain injury. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2018;17(9):689–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu Y, Zhang C, Li X, Frojd AR, Xing W, Clayborne AZ, Chen W. Significantly enhanced electrocatalytic activity of Au25 clusters by single platinum atom doping. Nano Energy. 2018;50:316–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang B, Chen Y, Shi J. Nanocatalytic medicine. Adv Mater. 2019;31(39):1901778.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo F, Zou Z, Zhang Z, Zeng T, Tan Y, Chen R, Wu W, Cheng N, Sun X. Confined sub-nanometer PtCo clusters as a highly efficient and robust electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Chem A. 2021;9(9):5468–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Geerts L, Cosentino S, Liao TW, Yadav A, Lin PC, Zharinov VS, Hu KJ, Longo A, Pereira LMC, Grandjean D, et al. Highly active oxygen evolution reaction model electrode based on supported gas-phase NiFe clusters. Catal Today. 2019;334:59–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang S, Liu Y, Sun S, Wang J, Li Q, Yan R, Gao Y, Liu H, Liu S, Hao W, et al. Catalytic patch with redox Cr/CeO2 nanozyme of noninvasive intervention for brain trauma. Theranostics. 2021;11(6):2806–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mu X, He H, Wang J, Long W, Li Q, Liu H, Gao Y, Ouyang L, Ren Q, Sun S, et al. Carbogenic nanozyme with ultrahigh reactive nitrogen species selectivity for traumatic brain injury. Nano Lett. 2019;19(7):4527–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mu X, Wang J, Li Y, Xu F, Long W, Ouyang L, Liu H, Jing Y, Wang J, Dai H, et al. Redox trimetallic nanozyme with neutral environment preference for brain injury. ACS Nano. 2019;13(2):1870–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan R, Sun S, Yang J, Long W, Wang J, Mu X, Li Q, Hao W, Zhang S, Liu H, et al. Nanozyme-based bandage with single-atom catalysis for brain trauma. ACS Nano. 2019;13(10):11552–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Q, Jiang J, Gao L. Nanozyme-based medicine for enzymatic therapy: progress and challenges. Biomed Mater. 2021;16:042002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith ES, Porterfield JE, Kannan RM. Leveraging the interplay of nanotechnology and neuroscience: Designing new avenues for treating central nervous system disorders. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;148:181–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang ZH, Wu W, Wang K. Oxygen reduction reaction catalyzed by noble metal clusters. Catalysts. 2018;8:2.

  19. Gu H, Yang Y, Tian JX, Shi GY. Photochemical synthesis of noble metal (Ag, Pd, Au, Pt) on Graphene/ZnO multihybrid nanoarchitectures as electrocatalysis for H2O2 reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(14):6762–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen K, Sun S, Wang J, Zhang X-D. Catalytic nanozymes for central nervous system disease. Coord Chem Rev. 2021;432:213751.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendoza K, Derry PJ, Cherian LM, Garcia R, Nilewski L, Goodman JC, Mbye L, Robertson CS, Tour JM, Kent TA. Functional and structural improvement with a catalytic carbon nano-antioxidant in experimental traumatic brain injury complicated by hypotension and resuscitation. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(13):2139–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, He H, Wang Y, Wang J, Sun X, Xu H, Nau WM, Zhang X, Huang F. Active tumor-targeting luminescent gold clusters with efficient urinary excretion. Chem Commun. 2016;52(59):9232–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tyo EC, Vajda S. Catalysis by clusters with precise numbers of atoms. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10(7):577–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hao W, Liu S, Liu H, Mu X, Chen K, Xin Q, Zhang X-D. In vivo neuroelectrophysiological monitoring of atomically precise Au25 clusters at an ultrahigh injected dose. ACS Omega. 2020;5(38):24537–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang XD, Wu D, Shen X, Liu PX, Fan FY, Fan SJ. In vivo renal clearance, biodistribution, toxicity of gold nanoclusters. Biomaterials. 2012;33(18):4628–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu H, Li Y, Sun S, Xin Q, Liu S, Mu X, Yuan X, Chen K, Wang H, Varga K, et al. Catalytically potent and selective clusterzymes for modulation of neuroinflammation through single-atom substitutions. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu J, Yu MX, Peng CQ, Carter P, Tian J, Ning XH, Zhou QH, Tu Q, Zhang G, Dao A, et al. Dose dependencies and biocompatibility of renal clearable gold nanoparticles: from mice to non-human primates. Angew Chem Int Edit. 2018;57(1):266–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun S, Liu HL, Xin Q, Chen K, Ma HZ, Liu SH, Mu XY, Hao WT, Liu SJ, Gao YL, et al. Atomic engineering of clusterzyme for relieving acute neuroinflammation through lattice expansion. Nano Lett. 2021;21(6):2562–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan SF, Lei Z, Guan ZJ, Wang QM. Atomically precise preorganization of open metal stes on gold nanoclusters with high catalytic performance. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60(10):5225–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Higaki T, Li Y, Zhao S, Li Q, Li S, Du XS, Yang S, Chai J, Jin R. Atomically tailored gold nanoclusters for catalytic application. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(25):8291–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tian S, Cao Y, Chen T, Zang S, Xie J. Ligand-protected atomically precise gold nanoclusters as model catalysts for oxidation reactions. Chem Commun. 2020;56(8):1163–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kudryashev JA, Waggoner LE, Leng HT, Mininni NH, Kwon EJ. An activity-based nanosensor for traumatic brain injury. ACS Sens. 2020;5(3):686–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li C, Li W, Liu H, Zhang Y, Chen G, Li Z, Wang Q. An Aactivatable NIR-II nanoprobe for in vivo early real-time diagnosis of traumatic brain injury. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(1):247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li C, Shah KA, Narayan RK. Rapid detection of traumatic brain injury. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(6):579–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Li Z, Ji S, Liu Y, Cao X, Tian S, Chen Y, Niu Z, Li Y. Well-defined materials for heterogeneous catalysis: from nanoparticles to isolated single-atom sites. Chem Rev. 2020;120(2):623–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cai X, Saranya G, Shen KQ, Chen MY, Si R, Ding WP, Zhu Y. Reversible switching of catalytic activity by shuttling an atom into and out of gold nanoclusters. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(29):9964–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kwak K, Lee D. Electrochemistry of atomically precise metal nanoclusters. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(1):12–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tang Q, Hu G, Fung V, Jiang DE. Insights into interfaces, stability, electronic properties, and catalytic activities of atomically precise metal nanoclusters from first principles. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51(11):2793–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu BL, Wang H, Wang WW, Gao LZ, Li SS, Pan XT, Wang HY, Yang HL, Meng XQ, Wu QW, et al. A single-atom nanozyme for wound disinfection applications. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(15):4911–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang XD, Zhang J, Wang J, Yang J, Chen J, Shen X, Deng J, Deng D, Long W, Sun YM, et al. Highly catalytic nanodots with renal clearance for radiation protection. ACS Nano. 2016;10(4):4511–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen D, Li J. Ultrasmall au nanoclusters for bioanalytical and biomedical applications: the undisclosed and neglected roles of ligands in determining the nanoclusters’ catalytic activities. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020;5(10):1355–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou R, Yan L, Dong X, Zhu S, Chen K, Wu Y, Xiang H, Li L, Zhang G, Gu Z, et al. Fractionated regimen-suitable immunoradiotherapy sensitizer based on ultrasmall Fe4Se2W18 nanoclusters enable tumor-specific radiosensitization augment and antitumor immunity boost. Nano Today. 2021;36(3):101003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Joseph B, Khan M, Rhee P. Non-invasive diagnosis and treatment strategies for traumatic brain injury: an update. J Neurosci Res. 2018;96(4):589–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Strubakos CD, Malik M, Wider JM, Lee IS, Reynolds CA, Mitsias P, Przyklenk K, Huttemann M, Sanderson TH. Non-invasive treatment with near-infrared light: A novel mechanisms-based strategy that evokes sustained reduction in brain injury after stroke. J Cerebr Blood F Met. 2020;40(4):833–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pink AE, Williams C, Alderman N, Stoffels M. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) following traumatic brain injury (TBI): a scoping review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021;31(3):479–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gao G, Chen R, He M, Li J, Li J, Wang L, Sun T. Gold nanoclusters for Parkinson’s disease treatment. Biomaterials. 2019;194:36–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu H, Hong G, Luo Z, Chen J, Chang J, Gong M, He H, Yang J, Yuan X, Li L, et al. Atomic-precision gold clusters for NIR‐II imaging. Adv Mater. 2019;31(46):1901015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fan Y, Liu S, Yi Y, Rong H, Zhang J. Catalytic nanomaterials toward atomic levels for biomedical applications: from metal clusters to single-atom catalysts. ACS Nano. 2021;15(2):2005–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhu J, Cai L, Yin X, Wang Z, Zhang L, Ma H, Ke Y, Du Y, Xi S, Wee ATS, et al. Enhanced electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity in single-atom Pt-decorated VS2 nanosheets. ACS Nano. 2020;14(5):5600–08.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhao S, Jin R, Abroshan H, Zeng C, Zhang H, House SD, Gottlieb E, Kim HJ, Yang JC, Jin R. Gold nanoclusters promote electrocatalytic water oxidation at the nanocluster/CoSe2 interface. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(3):1077–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang JY, Mu X, Li Y, Xu F, Long W, Yang J, Bian P, Chen J, Ouyang L, Liu H, et al. Hollow PtPdRh nanocubes with enhanced catalytic activities for in vivo clearance of radiation-induced ROS via surface-mediated bond breaking. Small. 2018;14(13):e1703736.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Seong H, Efremov V, Park G, Kim H, Yoo JS, Lee D. Atomically precise gold nanoclusters as model catalysts for identifying active sites for electroreduction of CO2. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;8:98.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jiang Y, Zhao X, Huang J, Li J, Upputuri PK, Sun H, Han X, Pramanik M, Miao Y, Duan H, et al. Transformable hybrid semiconducting polymer nanozyme for second near-infrared photothermal ferrotherapy. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Fan K, Xi J, Fan L, Wang P, Zhu C, Tang Y, Xu X, Liang M, Jiang B, Yan X, et al. In vivo guiding nitrogen-doped carbon nanozyme for tumor catalytic therapy. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1440.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Yong Y, Zhang C, Gu Z, Du J, Guo Z, Dong X, Xie J, Zhang G, Liu X, Zhao Y. Polyoxometalate-based radiosensitization platform for treating hypoxic tumors by attenuating radioresistance and enhancing radiation response. ACS Nano. 2017;11(7):7164–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ma M, Gao N, Li X, Liu Z, Pi Z, Du X, Ren J, Qu X. A biocompatible second near-infrared nanozyme for spatiotemporal and non-invasive attenuation of amyloid deposition through scalp and skull. ACS Nano. 2020;14(8):9894–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wu H, Li F, Wang S, Lu J, Li J, Du Y, Sun X, Chen X, Gao J, Ling D. Ceria nanocrystals decorated mesoporous silica nanoparticle based ROS-scavenging tissue adhesive for highly efficient regenerative wound healing. Biomaterials. 2018;151:66–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu Y, Cheng Y, Zhang H, Zhou M, Yu Y, Lin S, Jiang B, Zhao X, Miao L, Wei CW, et al. Integrated cascade nanozyme catalyzes in vivo ROS scavenging for anti-inflammatory therapy. Sci Adv. 2020;6(29):eabb2695.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Yuan X, Goswami N, Mathews I, Yu Y, Xie JP. Enhancing stability through ligand-shell engineering: A case study with Au25(SR)18 nanoclusters. Nano Res. 2015;8(11):3488–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Yao Q, Chen T, Yuan X, Xie J. Toward total synthesis of thiolate-protected metal nanoclusters. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51(6):1338–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vorhees CV, Williams MT. Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):848–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. D’Hooge R, De Deyn PP. Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Rev. 2001;36(1):60–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the NSFC (Grant Nos. 91859101, 81971744, U1932107, and 81471786), the National Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (19JCZDJC34000), the Foundation of ‘Peiyang Young Researcher’ Program of Tianjin University, and CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team (JCTD-2020-08).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yunguang Zhang and Si Sun contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science, Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi’an, 710121, China

    Yunguang Zhang & Jiangang Xu

  2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Materials Physics and Preparing Technology, School of Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300350, China

    Si Sun, Haile Liu, Qinjuan Ren & Xiao-Dong Zhang

  3. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Brain Science and Neuroengineering, Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Wenting Hao, Qi Xin, Hao Wang & Xiao-Dong Zhang

Authors
  1. Yunguang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Si Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haile Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qinjuan Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenting Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qi Xin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jiangang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiao-Dong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZX, WH, and XJ originated the concept. ZY and SS wrote the manuscript. SS and LH worked on materials synthesis and characterizations. RQ, HW, and XQ worked on biological experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiangang Xu, Hao Wang or Xiao-Dong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We have obtained approval of animal ethics and use committee (IRM-DWLL-2019099). All animal procedure was followed the guideline approved by the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The content of metal elements in the clusters were quantified by ICP-MS. Figure S2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of clusters. Figure S3. Cell survival of (a) HT22, (b) BV2 and (c) MA-c cells in the presence of various concentrations of clusters. Figure S4. Hematology of mice treated with or without gold clusters on day 30. Figure S5. Blood biochemistry analysis of mice treated with or without gold clusters on day 30. Figure S6. Histology of major organs in mice.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Sun, S., Liu, H. et al. Catalytically active gold clusters with atomic precision for noninvasive early intervention of neurotrauma. J Nanobiotechnol 19, 319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01071-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01071-4

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us