Skip to main content
Download PDF

Minimizing adverse effects of Cerenkov radiation induced photodynamic therapy with transformable photosensitizer-loaded nanovesicles

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 20, Article number: 203 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising antitumor strategy with fewer adverse effects and higher selectivity than conventional therapies. Recently, a series of reports have suggested that PDT induced by Cerenkov radiation (CR) (CR-PDT) has deeper tissue penetration than traditional PDT; however, the strategy of coupling radionuclides with photosensitizers may cause severe side effects.

Methods

We designed tumor-targeting nanoparticles (131I-EM@ALA) by loading 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) into an 131I-labeled exosome mimetic (EM) to achieve combined antitumor therapy. In addition to playing a radiotherapeutic role, 131I served as an internal light source for the Cerenkov radiation (CR).

Results

The drug-loaded nanoparticles effectively targeted tumors as confirmed by confocal imaging, flow cytometry, and small animal fluorescence imaging. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that 131I-EM@ALA produced a promising antitumor effect through the synergy of radiotherapy and CR-PDT. The nanoparticles killed tumor cells by inducing DNA damage and activating the lysosome-mitochondrial pathways. No obvious abnormalities in the hematology analyses, blood biochemistry, or histological examinations were observed during the treatment.

Conclusions

We successfully engineered a nanocarrier coloaded with the radionuclide 131I and a photosensitizer precursor for combined radiotherapy and PDT for the treatment of breast cancer.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is already a clinically approved and promising therapeutic modality for the treatment of neoplastic and non-malignant disease [1]. PDT involves irradiating photosensitizers (PSs) with light of specific wavelengths to trigger the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn cause cancer cell death [2]. However, PDT has been confined to superficial tissues owing to the rapid attenuation of light in tissue and the concomitant limited tissue penetration [3]. Several strategies have been designed to address this issue, including those based on near-infrared light, self-luminescence, X-ray radiation, and Cerenkov radiation (CR) [4,5,6,7]. In Cerenkov radiation-induced PDT (CR-PDT), photosensitizers are activated by CR produced by nearby radionuclides to generate damaging ROS, making it a promising type of PDT for addressing the depth dependency [5, 8, 9]. However, this phenomenon, also known as Cerenkov resonance energy transfer (CRET) [3, 10], still has several limitations. When the radionuclide and photosensitizer are administered separately, the CR interaction can be weak and the therapeutic effect of the CR-PDT can be limited [11], while the strategy of coupling a radionuclide with a photosensitizer can lead to the continuous generation of ROS throughout the blood circulation period, making the modality effectively a normal chemotherapeutic agent [12]. Thus, the development of a CR-PDT strategy with high efficacy and tumor accumulation, while minimizing its adverse effects, is of major significance, but remains challenging [12].

Exosomes are considered promising delivery vehicles owing to their excellent biocompatibility, drug-carrying capacity, and tumor targeting ability [13, 14]. However, there are significant barriers to the therapeutic use of exosomes, primarily owing to their low yield from cell cultures [15, 16]. In view of the low yield of exosome production, several studies have demonstrated that exosome-mimetics (EMs) can be used to substitute exosomes [17, 18]. EMs, which are prepared by the serial extrusion of cells, have cell membranes and sizes similar to those of exosomes, higher yield, and the same powerful tumor targeting ability [19,20,21,22]. To further improve the efficiency of drug delivery, FDA-approved 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) was used to optimize the administration agents. According to FDA data, ALA alone was eliminated quickly after administration, the clinical safety data, which consists of integrated safety data from 527 patients (safety analysis set) who received at least 1 dose of 20 mg/kg, was proved to be safe [23]. And studies have shown that ALA is an extremely powerful drug for PDT [24,25,26]. In the heme biosynthesis pathway, ALA is a natural precursor of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), a commonly used photosensitizer in clinical PDT [27]. Abundant mitochondria are necessary for the conversion of ALA to PpIX. Thus, at the tumor site, CR from 131I decay activates PpIX to produce ROS, which kill tumor cells. However, in normal tissues, the conversion of ALA to PpIX is limited, resulting in little damage. In addition, the dominant emission of CR is in the ultraviolet and blue regions of the visible spectrum [28], which makes CR ideal for triggering ultraviolet and blue wavelength-responsive PSs such as PpIX [29].

On the basis of these previous observations, we designed a novel modality with a view to optimizing the therapeutic effect of CR-PDT to reduce side effects and improve the antitumor efficacy of CR-PDT. Efficient labeling of ALA-loaded EMs (EM@ALA) with 131I was achieved using the chloramine-T method (131I-EM@ALA). 131I-EM@ALA was expected to accumulate in tumors following intravenous (iv) administration because of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and homologous targeting characteristics [20,21,22]. The abundant mitochondria at the tumor site were then expected to convert ALA into the active photosensitizer PpIX, which would generate ROS under CR stimulation. The combination of 131I radiation therapy (RT) and CR-PDT was therefore expected to achieve a strong antitumor effect, while the relatively low accumulation of PpIX in normal tissues would prevent the release of payload to minimize any adverse effects of CR-PDT. Overall, the local generation of PpIX in tumor tissue was expected to significantly enhance the tumor therapy effect and reduce the adverse effects of CR-PDT, providing a promising strategy for CR-PDT tumor therapy (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Illustration of the ALA-loaded and 131I-labeled exosome-mimetics nanoparticles (131I-EM@ALA) used for synergistic internal radiotherapy and Cerenkov radiation induced photodynamic therapy

Full size image

Materials

Preparation and characterization of EM@ALA

Experiments were performed with mouse breast cancer cell line 4T1, which was maintained in 1640 (Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 10,000 units of penicillin and 10 mg/ml of streptomycin. Cells were cultivated at 37 ℃ and 5% CO2. EM@ALA was prepared according to the previous report [30]. 4T1 cancer cell line was a generous gift from Oncology Department, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. 4T1 cancer cells were collected by trypsin, resuspended by hypotonic solution (PBS: ddH2O = 1:3), and disrupted at 4 ℃ for 2 h. Afterwards, the broken 4T1 cells were centrifuged at 700g for 10 min at 4 °C and the collected sediment was resuspended and centrifuged again at 14,000g for 30 min. After that, the 4T1 cell membrane and ALA solution were passed through a 0.4um polycarbonate membrane by extruded physically for 11 times.

The result of particle size and zeta potential distributions were gained by using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). EM@ALA solutions were stored at 4 ℃ for stability analysis. A transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEM-2010 ES500 W, Japan) operating at 200 keV was used to show the morphology of EM@ALA. Representative protein of EM@ALA was analyzed by western blot (WB). The absorption properties of samples was revealed by UV–vis spectrometry (Synergy 2, BioTek Instruments Inc., USA).

The preparation of 131I-EM@ALA

131I-EM@ALA was prepared by chloramine T method [31]. Briefly, 40 μl (30 mci/ml) 131I (Gaotong, Chengdu, China) solution was added to 50 μl EM@ALA solution, then 15 μl 25 mg/ml chloramine T solution was added to the mixtures and vortexed for 90 s. Then 5 μl 100 mg/ml sodium pyrosulfite solution was added to terminate the reaction. The labeling efficiency and stability were measured by thin layer chromatography (TLC). The instant thin-layer chromatography-silica gel (iTLC-SG) was used as the medium and normal saline as the developing agent. The stability of labeling rate in fetal bovine serum (FBS) and PBS within 48 h was measured by this method.

Cell viability experiment

CCK-8 assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity effect of 131I-EM@ALA. 4T1 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 6000 cells/well and cultured for 24 h. 131I-EM@ALA, 131I-EM, EM@ALA, Na131I and PBS were added to the medium with different concentrations, and incubated for another 24 h. After incubation, the CCK-8 assay was performed to determine the cell viability.

Cellular uptake and localization of 131I-EM@ALA

4T1 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well and cultured for 24 h. Then 131I-EM@ALA (2 μci/well) or Na131I (2 μci/well) were added to the medium respectively. After incubated for different time points (1, 2, 4, and 6 h), cells and supernatant were collected and measured with a well-type γ-counter (2470 Automatic Gamma Counter WIZARD, PerkinElmer, Norwalk CT, USA).

4T1 cells were seeded into each 24-well plate at a concentration of 6 × 104 cells per well and cultured for 24 h. After being treated with cy5 labeled EM@ALA for different time points, the tumor cells were observed by using a fluorescence confocal microscope or analyzed by flow cytometry.

Cerenkov radiation with 131I Radioisotope

Cerenkov radiation was detected using an IVIS system (PerkinElmer Inc.) under various conditions (PBS, ALA, PpIX, Na131I, Na 131I + ALA, and Na 131I + PpIX, all the drugs were free condition). The images were acquired with different emission filters, and the excitation was blocked.

Western blot

4T1 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 3 × 106 cells/well and cultured for 24 h. Then PBS, EM@ALA, 131I-EM, 131I-EM@ALA were added to the medium respectively and cultivated for 24 h. Total protein was gained from 4T1 cells by RIPA buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). The tumor-bearing mice were injected PBS, EM@ALA, 131I-EM (0.2 mci), 131I-EM@ALA (0.2 mci) respectively. Total protein was gained from the tumor of mice by RIPA buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). The protein concentrations of tumor cells were measured with BCA protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Equal amounts of protein (20 μg) were added into each lane of a 10% SDS-PAGE (New Cell & Molecular Biotech, China) and separated. Then transferred the protein onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, United States), and the membranes were blocked by Protein Free Rapid Blocking Buffer (EpiZyme, China) for 2 h and incubated with primary antibodies at 4 ℃ for 12 h. The primary antibodies used are as followed: anti-Caspase 3 (1:1000, Abclonal, China), anti-γ-H2AX (1:1000, Proteintech, United States), anti-KU70 (1:5000, Proteintech, United States), anti-RAD51 (1:1000, Proteintech, United States), and anti-GAPDH (1:1000, Abclonal, China). After incubation with HRP-coupled secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit or rabbit anti-mouse IgG, 1:10,000, Boster, China), the membranes were treated with chemiluminescence (Solarbio, China) for 3 min and visualized on a Visionwork system.

Animal models

All animal studies were conducted under the guidance and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. BALB/c mice (female, 5–6 weeks old) were purchased from Weitong Lihua Laboratory Animal Center (Beijing, China), and maintained in a pathogen-free environment. 4T1 cells (1 × 107 in 100 µl PBS) were subcutaneously injected into the right front leg of the BALB/C mice (Weitong Lihua Laboratory Animal Center, Beijing, China). The tumor-bearing mice were used for the following experiments after the tumor volume reached approximately 80 mm3. The tumor volume was calculated with the formula: length × width2 × 0.5.

In vivo fluorescence imaging

When the tumor volumes ranged between 80 and 100 mm3, ICG-EM@ALA was injected to the tumor-bearing mice. The in vivo fluorescence imaging was conducted at different time points after injection. Tumors and organs of interest were resected and imaged 24 and 48 h later.

To detect the fluorescence signal of PpIX in vivo, 4T1 tumor bearing mice were sacrificed, and the interested tissues (e.g., heart, liver, kidneys, muscle, and tumor) were harvested for the fluorescence detection of PpIX by animal fluorescence imaging in 24 h after EM@ALA injection.

SPECT/CT imaging and biodistribution experiment

Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was conducted to observe the whole-body distribution of 131I-EM@ALA in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice using a human SPECT/CT device (NM670, GE, United States). Four days before the SPECT/CT imaging experiment, all mice were fed with 1‰ potassium iodide solution. The mice of experimental group were injected with 131I-EM@ALA (0.2 mCi, 0.1 ml) while the mice of control group were injected with Na131I (0.2 mCi, 0.1 ml). The SPECT/CT images were acquired 24 h after the drug injection.

For the biodistribution experiment, 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (n = 4 in each group) were injected with 131I-EM@ALA or Na131I (0.2 mCi, 0.1 ml) via tail vein, and sacrificed at 24 h. The organs (e.g., blood, heart, liver, muscle, tumor) of interest were harvested and weighed. Radioactivity of tissue was quantified using a γ-counter.

Therapeutic effect in animals

To explore the 131I-EM@ALA treatment effect, the mice were divided into 4 groups (n = 8 per group) randomly for various treatments when the tumor volumes reached 80 mm3: (1) PBS; (2) EM@ALA; (3) 131I-EM; (4) 131I-EM@ALA. The dosages of 131I and ALA in these studies were 25 μCi/g and 30 μg/g, respectively. Tumor volume was measured once every 2 days for 19 days. The survival rate was assessed by the Kaplan–Meier method. The end point events were defined as follow: tumor volumes > 1500 mm3; ulcerating tumor tissue; mortality; > 15% weight loss.

In vivo toxicity evaluation

Group division and drugs injection were as described above (n = 4 per group). In vivo toxicity was assessed using body weight change, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, hematology and blood biochemistry indices. The general state of the animals was observed daily, and the body weight of the mice was monitored every other day. At the end of the 19-day treatment, whole blood was collected and analyzed to determine aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CRE), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) using a biochemical analyzer (Chemray240, China). Meanwhile, the samples of blood and interested tissues (heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, muscle, and thyroid) were harvested for H&E staining. Besides, since we are interested in the toxicity differences between 131I-EM@ALA group and 131I-EM@PpIX group, tumor-bearing mice were sacrificed after 7, 14 and 21 days from the nanoparticle application, and samples of blood and interested tissues were harvested for the further analysis.

Histological analysis

Interested organs and tumor tissues were taken out from mice and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, then embedded in paraffin after 19-day treatment. The sliced interested organs and tumor tissues were further performed for H&E, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) and Ki67 staining.

Statistical analysis

All values were presented as the means ± standard deviation (SD). The significance level was set as 0.05, and the data were presented with (*) for p < 0.05, (**) for p < 0.01, and (***) for p < 0.001, respectively.

Results

Fabrication and characterization of EM@ALA

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results showed the spherical morphology of EM@ALA and EM nanoparticles (Fig. 1a). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) experiments demonstrated that the mean radius of the EM@ALA and EM nanoparticles was 154.8 ± 2.8 nm and 144.4 ± 1.4 nm, respectively (Fig. 1b). To determine whether functionalized membrane proteins were retained on the EM@ALA and EM, the protein content of the EM@ALA and EM particles was analyzed by western blot. Compared with the 4T1 cell lysate, the cell membrane proteins were mostly retained in the form of EM@ALA and EM (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The results showed that EM@ALA and EM presented similar protein profiles to that of 4T1 cell lysate (Fig. 1c). The membrane-specific markers in EM@ALA and EM, such as positive antigen CD44, were well inherited from 4T1 cells, while the cytosol marker (i.e., glyceraldehyde 3‑phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)) and the nuclear protein marker (i.e., histone H3) were almost undetected in the final EM@ALA and EM particles. In addition, the size of EM@ALA changed slightly from 153.1 ± 3.0 nm on the first day to 155.5 ± 2.2 nm on the seventh day; The Zeta potential of EM@ALA also changed slightly from − 11.8 ± 0.7 mv on the first day to − 11.9 ± 0.3 on the seventh day, indicating the excellent stability of the nanoplatform (Fig. 1d, e). The radiolabeling efficiency to give 131I-EM@ALA was approximately 96.65% in PBS (Fig. 1f). The radiochemical stabilities were 80.5 ± 1.3% in PBS and 74.3 ± 2.2% in FBS for up to 48 h (Fig. 1g, h), which suggests that the radiolabeled 131I-EM@ALA nanoplatform had excellent biological stability in terms of size and radiochemistry profile and could be applied to in vivo biological systems. In further experiments (Fig. 1i), ALA, which can be transformed into PpIX in mitochondria, was found to be the optimal PS because PpIX has an ideally matched absorbance wavelength (λabs < 480 nm) for Cerenkov light (major emission in the ultraviolet and blue regions of the visible spectrum [28], λ < 480 nm).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characteristics of 131I-EM@ALA. 4T1 tumor cells derived drug-loaded EM and empty EM assessed by TEM (a), DLS (b) and WB (c). Scale bar = 100 nm. Size (d) and Zeta potential (e) stability test of EM@ALA and EM in PBS for 7 days. f The representative radiochemical purity of 131I-EM@ALA. Radiolabeling stability test in PBS (g) and FBS (h) during 48 h (n = 3). i UV–vis spectrum of PpIX and PBS

Full size image

Cellular uptake and effects of 131I-EM@ALA treatment

Cy5-labeled EM@ALA nanoparticles were incubated with 4T1 cells for different time periods and the results were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy and flow cytometry. Confocal images revealed strong Cy5-red fluorescence signals in the cytoplasm at 1, 2, and 3 h (Fig. 2a). Flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 2b and c) showed that the tumor cell binding increased slightly over time, and there was no statistical difference between the 1-h incubation and 2-h incubation samples (p = 0.13), or the 2-h incubation and 3-h incubation samples (p = 0.08); however, a statistical difference was observed between the 1-h incubation and 3-h incubation samples (p < 0.05). To accurately determine the uptake rate, we performed a cell uptake assay using a radionuclide label. As illustrated in Fig. 2d, the uptake of 131I-EM@ALA by 4T1 cells increased gradually over time and reached a maximum at 6 h, which was significantly higher than the uptake of Na131I (p < 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tumor-binding and antitumor effects of 131I-EM@ALA. Confocal fluorescence images (a) and flow cytometry (b, c) of tumor cells after incubation with Cy5@EM@ALA for different times. Scale bar = 25 μm. Cell nuclei were stained blue with DAPI, filamentous actin cytoskeletons were stained green with FITC phalloidin. d In vitro uptake of 131I labeled EM@ALA or Na131I by 4T1 cells at different points. e EM@ALA and 4T1 cells were incubated for 2 h before visualization of PpIX-specific fluorescence by confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 25 μm. 24 h after EM@ALA injection, ex vivo fluorescence images (f) of PpIX signal and semi-quantitative analysis (g). h Viability of 4T1 cells with various treatments

Full size image

We then verified the ability of ALA-derived PpIX to accumulate in cancer cells. Twenty-four hours after intravenous injection, a red fluorescence signal from PpIX in 4T1 cells was clearly detected (Fig. 2e). Subsequently, we examined the conversion of ALA to PpIX in vivo. PpIX fluorescence signals in the tumors and major organs showed that ALA was successfully converted to PpIX—predominantly within tumors (by endogenous enzymes)—and little PpIX accumulated in the liver (Fig. 2f). Semi-quantitative analysis showed that the PpIX fluorescence intensity in tumors was approximately 1.8-fold that in the liver (Fig. 2g). As illustrated in Fig. 2h, the relative viabilities of the 4T1 cells had a negative correlation with both the ALA concentration and 131I activity. In the absence of laser light, EM@ALA exhibited no clear cytotoxicity towards 4T1 cells at two different concentrations. At an ALA concentration of 700 μg/ml and 131I radioactivity of 1000 μCi/ml, the viability of the 4T1 cells was 100 ± 3%, 96.8 ± 18.5%, 47.3 ± 2.4%, 33.1 ± 1.9%, and 8.8 ± 0.6% following treatment with PBS, EM@ALA, Na131I, 131I-EM, and 131I-EM@ALA, respectively. The 131I-EM@ALA group showed the best antitumor effect of groups tested, demonstrating the cooperative effect of radiotherapy and CR-PDT. In addition, 131I-EM showed a better treatment effect than Na131I, which may be because of the higher cell uptake of 131I-EM.

Cerenkov radiation imaging

To detect the Cerenkov radiation and CRET, we used a small-animal in vivo imaging system (IVIS) to collect 131I emission without excitation light. As shown in Fig. 3a and b, the solutions containing PBS, ALA, and PpIX did not emit fluorescence, while we detected a clear fluorescence signal from the solutions containing 131I, 131I plus ALA, and 131I plus PpIX, and the signal of the 131I plus PpIX solution was higher than that of the 131I plus ALA solution (p < 0.05). The fluorescence signals of the solutions containing 131I and PpIX increased when the concentration of 131I increased (Fig. 3c and 3d), as did those of the solutions containing 131I without PpIX (Additional file 1: Fig. S3), while the fluorescence signal decreased when the concentration of PpIX increased (Fig. 3e and f). These results indicate that the CR energy could be transferred to PpIX.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cerenkov radiation. a Cerenkov radiation imaging in different kinds of solutions and the semi-quantitative analysis (b). c Cerenkov radiation imaging with 1.5 μg/μl PpIX and different concentration of 131I and the semi-quantitative analysis (d). e Cerenkov radiation imaging with 4 μCi/μl 131I and different concentration of PpIX and the semi-quantitative analysis (f)

Full size image

In vivo NIRF imaging

The distribution of the nanoparticles in vivo was investigated by intravenously injecting ICG-EM@ALA into 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. The in vivo fluorescence signals in the tumors gradually increased over time and reached maximum intensity at 24 h, suggesting time-dependent accumulation of ICG-labeled EM@ALA in the tumor (Fig. 4a). The T/M ratio peaked at 24 h after injection (1.7 ± 0.1; Fig. 4b). The ex vivo fluorescence images further confirmed the accumulation of ICG-EM@ALA at the tumor site. Notably, strong fluorescence was also detected in the liver, likely due to the clearance of EM@ALA nanoparticles by the liver (Fig. 4c and d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

In vivo and ex vivo imaging with ICG-EM@ALA. In vivo fluorescence images (a) of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice taken at different time points and semi-quantitative analysis. b Ex vivo fluorescence images (c) of major organs and tumor dissected from mice at 24 h and 48 h and Semi-quantitative analysis (d)

Full size image

To further confirm the accumulation of 131I-EM@ALA at the tumor sites, SPECT/CT imaging was carried out to evaluate the distribution of 131I-EM@ALA in vivo. SPECT/CT images were acquired 24 h after injection. The signal in the tumor region was markedly higher than that in surrounding tissues (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The biodistribution results showed that the T/B (tumor to blood) and T/M (tumor to muscle) ratios were approximately 2.1 ± 0.6 and 4.7 ± 1.1, respectively (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The results of imaging and biodistribution showed that 131I-EM@ALA effectively accumulated in the tumor region.

In vivo tumor therapy in a 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse model

We examined whether the combination of CR-PDT and radiotherapy could effectively inhibit tumor growth. At 19 days post treatment, the tumor volume for the 131I-EM@ALA group (580.0 ± 146.4 mm3) was significantly smaller than those of the 131I-EM (1081.5 ± 273.5 mm3) or EM@ALA groups (1414.9 ± 194.9 mm3), which indicated that combination therapy had greater antitumor efficacy than 131I-radiotherapy alone (Fig. 5a). Notably, no statistical difference was found between the EM@ALA group and control group, indicating that 131I CR was critical to CR-PDT. The survival rates were recorded over 35 days (Fig. 5b). 131I-EM@ALA (12.5%, 35 days) and 131I-EM@PpIX (25%, 35 days) markedly prolonged the survival time compared with the control (0%, 24 days). At the end of the treatments, the tumors were harvested (Fig. 5c) and stained (Fig. 5d). H&E staining of the tumor tissues showed reduced nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratios, which were related to a decrease in the number of cancer cells in mice injected with 131I-EM@ALA. Ki67 staining and TUNEL staining showed that treatment with 131I-EM@ALA and 131I-EM@PpIX induced the highest rate of apoptosis and an optimal level of necrotic lesions.

Fig. 5
figure 5

In vivo antitumor effects of 131I-EM@ALA. The tumor growth (a) and survival curves (b) of 4T1 tumors after different treatments. c Photographs of excised tumors at day 19. d HE staining of tumors. Scale bar = 25 μm. Ki67 staining and TENEL staining. Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

In vivo toxicity evaluation

No obvious weight loss was observed for any of the groups during the 19-day experiment (Fig. 6a). The results showed that both routine blood parameters and blood biochemistry parameters were within the normal ranges of fluctuation (Fig. 6b–d). Representative H&E staining showed that there was no obvious histological damage (Fig. 6e). These results suggest that 131I-EM@ALA had excellent biocompatibility.

Fig. 6
figure 6

In vivo toxicity test. a Changes in animal body weight at 19 days. Blood biochemistry data including liver function markers b: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and kidney function markers c: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CRE). d Blood routine parameters data. White blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes number (Lymph#), monocyte number (Mon#), Neutrophil number (Neu#), lymphocytes percentage (Lymph%), monocyte percentage (Mon%), neutrophil percentage (Neu%), red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), hematocrit (HCT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), red cell volume distribution width (RDW), Platelets (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV). d HE-stained slice images of major organs. Scale bar = 50 μm

Full size image

We compared the effects of 131I-EM@ALA and 131I-EM@PpIX in vivo to evaluate the potential of our strategy to reduce toxicity. As shown in Fig. 7a–c, the RBC, PLT, and HGB of the 131I-EM@PpIX group were lower than those of the 131I-EM@ALA group at 7, 14, and 21 days (p < 0.05), except for PLT at 14 days (p = 0.18), indicating that the blood cells in the 131I-EM@PpIX group were impaired. At 21 days post treatment, the levels of AST, ALT, and ALP for the 131I-EM@PpIX group were significantly higher than those of the 131I-EM@ALA group (Fig. 7d), indicating that hepatocytes were damaged by 131I-EM@PpIX. H&E staining at 7, 14, and 21 days showed severe oedema for hepatocytes in the 131I-EM@PpIX group, but not in the 131I-EM@ALA group (Fig. 7e), indicating marked damage to liver cells in the 131I-EM@PpIX group. We therefore inferred that the damage was caused by CR-PDT, but not radiotherapy. All the results show that our strategy of using a photosensitizer precursor (ALA) instead of photosensitizers (such as PpIX) greatly reduced the adverse effects.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Toxicity comparison of two groups over time. a–c RBC, PLT and HGB levels at 7, 14, and 21 days. d AST, ALT, and ALP levels at 21 days. e HE-stained tissues from mice to monitor the histological changes in liver at different time points after intravenous injection of 131I-EM@ALA and 131I-EM@PpIX. Scale bar = 100 μm

Full size image

Tumor cell apoptosis mechanism

Many recent studies have shown that PDT leads to tumor death via the lysosomal pathway [32, 33]. The in vitro expression of apoptosis related proteins (caspase 3) and radiological DNA damage and repair related proteins (γ-H2AX, KU70, and RAD51) [34,35,36,37] was investigated, as shown in Fig. 8a and b. The expression of caspase 3 in the 131I-EM@ALA group was significantly higher than those for the 131I-EM group (p < 0.01) and control group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the expression of radiological DNA damage and repair related proteins (KU70 and RAD51) for the 131I-EM@ALA group was higher than that for the 131I-EM group (p < 0.001) and control group (p < 0.001). In the in vivo experiment, the expression of KU70 in the 131I-EM@ALA group was lower than that for the 131I-EM@ group (Fig. 8c and d).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of 131I-EM@ALA treatment on apoptotic-related proteins (caspase 3, γ-H2AX, KU70, and RAD51) in 4T1 cells determined by western blot in vitro (a) and in vivo (c). The relative protein expressions of caspase 3, γ-H2AX, KU70, and RAD51. The protein expression levels were detected and evaluated in vitro (b) and in vivo (d) by Image J software, GAPDH was detected as a loading control

Full size image

Discussion

We designed exosome-mimetic nanoparticles loaded with ALA and modified them with the radionuclide 131I (131I-EM@ALA). 131I-EM@ALA can be accumulated at tumor sites by EPR effect due to the nanoscale size [38]. Besides, because of the plasma membrane proteins on the surface including galectin-3, N-cadherin, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule, tumor-derived micro-vesicles possess some unique properties such as antigenic display and homologous binding [39, 40]. For instance, cancer cell membranes carrying the tumor-specific surface antigens have the excellent homologous selectivity to target the tumor with the same source [20, 41,42,43]. Studies have shown that exosomes could specifically target receptor cells to deliver their cargoes [44,45,46]. The homologous targeting of cancer cell membranes has been widely applied in tumor therapy, but the tumor-targeting mechanism is still unclear need to be further elucidated [47]. In our study, the nanoparticles were shown to be stable in structure and have excellent antitumor effects and no obvious side effects. The strategy of using CR to excite the photosensitizer PpIX, which was produced from ALA, effectively suppressed the tumor growth and minimized the side effects on normal organs, particularly the liver and blood cells. This observation is attributed to the conversion of ALA to PpIX mainly occurring at tumor sites and rarely in normal tissue. Our study offers a new therapeutic avenue for PDT that does not rely on external light sources and minimizes side effects.

Biomimetic nanoparticles encapsulated by an active cell membrane are attracting increasing attention [48, 49]. Owing to their preserved cell membrane structure, biomimetic nanoparticles can exhibit special functions, such as extended blood circulation, immune system evasion, and efficient drug delivery, and can be used as vaccines [50, 51]. Cancer cells can form intercellular homologous junctions with membrane proteins because of the surface adhesion molecules expressed on cancer cells. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles are therefore expected to offer homologous targeting ability, making them the ideal vehicle for drug delivery and effective cancer therapy. Our findings supported this expectation: 131I-EM@ALA effectively targeted tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo (Figs. 2a, and 4a). In addition, the results of DLS, TEM, and WB showed that the properties of the exosome-mimetic nanoparticles did not change significantly after modification. The radiolabeling stability was 80.5 ± 1.3% in PBS and 70.4 ± 2.2% in FBS at 48 h, which was sufficient for the subsequent studies. The CR imaging and CRET imaging experiments showed that our CR-PDT strategy had a clear dose-dependent effect (Fig. 3a–f), and the results demonstrated that PpIX could be excited by the UV/blue CL of the radionuclide 131I, which in turn induced PDT.

We next verified the synergistic therapeutic effects of radiotherapy and CR-PDT in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. Cell viability was evaluated and showed that the 131I-EM@ALA group had a greater antitumor effect than the 131I-EM and EM@ALA groups, indicating that both 131I and ALA are required for CR-PDT. In the subsequent animal experiments, the combined radio-photodynamic therapy in the 131I-EM@ALA group markedly inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival time. The results of H&E staining, Ki67 staining, and TUNEL staining showed the highest rate of apoptosis for 131I-EM@ALA. Notably, in our CR-PDT antitumor study, substitution of the photosensitizer PpIX with the photosensitizer precursor ALA did not significantly reduce the efficacy of antitumor therapy.

Ni et al. designed magnetic targeting nanostructures with surface conjugating photosensitizer and chelator-free labeling of 89Zr (89Zr-MNP/TCPP) for magnetism-enhanced CR-induced PDT, the nanoparticles exhibited high antitumor effect with suppressed tumor growth. But the liver was damaged at 7 days p.i. even through self-recovered within two months. The spatiotemporal colocalization of the photosensitizer with the radionuclide in these studies resulted in excellent therapeutic efficacy, but potential side effects to healthy tissues arouse at the same time. Thus, minimizing side-effects of CR-PDT is important but remains challenging [3, 12]. To optimize the treatment strategy, we designed transformable photosensitizer-loaded nanovesicles and labeled with 131I for minimizing side-effects of CR-PDT. Transformable photosensitizer ALA makes our system valuable because ALA converts to the PpIX mainly in cancer cells and PDT activated only at the tumor site. Subsequently, we assessed the side effects of combined radio-photodynamic therapy. The strategy of coupling a radionuclide with a photosensitizer has the potential to continuously generate ROS during blood circulation, effectively creating a normal chemotherapeutic agent, which has been shown to result in side effects to healthy tissues [12]. In this study, we designed a nanoparticle loaded with ALA and labeled with 131I. At the tumor site, ALA is converted to the photosensitizer PpIX in the abundant mitochondria, then 131I-derived Cerenkov radiation combined with the PpIX activates CR-PDT, leading to tumor death. In contrast, in normal tissues, ALA is rarely converted to PpIX; therefore, PDT is not activated, leading to limited side effects on normal tissues. Following the 19-day treatment, no weight loss was observed, and the routine blood parameters, blood biochemistry parameters, and H&E staining were within the normal range of fluctuation for the 131I-EM@ALA group; however, liver damage was clearly observed in the 131I-EM@PpIX group (Fig. 6a–e). We therefore compared the effects of 131I-EM@ALA and 131I-EM@PpIX by monitoring the levels of RBC, HGB, and PLT and liver H&E staining every 7 days. The results showed that 131I-EM@PpIX caused blood cell and hepatocyte damage that was not observed for the 131I-EM@ALA group (Fig. 7a–e). A possible reason for this may be that 131I-EM@PpIX continuously produced ROS during its blood circulation, particularly in the blood and liver (the EM nanoparticles were found to accumulate in the liver, Fig. 4a).

To further clarify the molecular mechanism of 131I-EM@ALA for synergistic internal radiotherapy and Cerenkov radiation, we tested the apoptotic-related proteins in liver and autophagy-related proteins (P62 and LC3) in 4T1 cell and 4T1 tumor tissue. The results showed that, radiological DNA damage and repair related proteins (KU70 and RAD51) for the 131I-EM@ALA group were overexpressed both in liver and tumor cells. Compared with the control group, the expression of caspase 3 in liver did not change significantly in 131I-EM@ALA group, which means ROS-mediated apoptosis did not occur in liver (Additional file 1: Fig. S6a). Besides, 131I-EM@ALA significantly reduced protein expressions of P62 and increased protein expressions of LC3 (Additional file 1: Fig. S6b and c). In the autophagy process, LC3 will overexpress while the autophagy substrate p62 will be specifically degraded [52]. These results indicated that the autophagy level was significantly elevated in the 131I-EM@ALA group compared to the controls. Studies showed that ALA-mediated PDT could induce superoxide anion-dependent autophagic cell death [53], which is consistent with our findings. Thus, we inferred that both radiation injury and ALA-mediated PDT were the molecular mechanism of 131I-EM@ALA combination therapy, but ALA-mediated PDT was the dominant one.

Conclusion

The multifunctional platform 131I-EM@ALA was successfully synthesized for the effective delivery of 131I and ALA. By extending the blood circulation, 131I-EM@ALA improved the delivery of 131I and ALA into cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo, thereby enhancing the therapeutic effect. The 131I not only acts as a radiotherapeutic, but its CR also provides an internal light source. The results showed that the subcutaneous tumor-bearing mice could be significantly inhibited by only one injection of 131I-EM@ALA. By comparing the toxicity of the 131I-EM@ALA and 131I-EM@PpIX groups, we confirmed that our strategy of using ALA, which is a photosensitizer precursor, effectively reduced the side effects of treatment. Our study provides a novel multi-therapeutic concept for antitumor treatment, as well as offering a new vision for synergistic radiotherapy and CR-PDT without an external light source.

Abbreviations

PDT:

Photodynamic therapy

CR:

Cerenkov radiation

CR-PDT:

The Cerenkov radiation-induced PDT

ALA:

5-Aminolevulinic acid

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

EM:

Exosome-mimetic

PpIX:

Protoporphyrin IX

PSs:

Photosensitizers

EPR:

The enhanced permeability and retention

RT:

Radiation therapy

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

TEM:

Transmission electron microscope

WB:

Western blot

iTLC-SG:

The instant thin-layer chromatography-silica gel

SPECT/CT:

Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

CRE:

Creatinine

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

WBC:

White blood cells

Neu%:

Neutrophil percentage

Lymph%:

Lymphocytes percentage

Mon%:

Monocyte percentage

RBC:

Red blood cells

HCT:

Hematocrit

HGB:

Hemoglobin

MCH:

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin

MCV:

Mean corpuscular volume

MCHC:

Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

PLT:

Platelets

MPV:

Mean platelet volume

RDW:

Red cell volume distribution width

H&E staining:

Hematoxylin and eosin staining

TUNEL staining:

Terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end-labeling staining

SD:

Standard deviation

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3‑phosphate dehydrogenase

References

  1. Agostinis P, et al. Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:250–81. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chelakkot VS, et al. MEK reduces cancer-specific PpIX accumulation through the RSK-ABCB1 and HIF-1α-FECH axes. Sci Rep. 2020;10:22124–22124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79144-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ni D, et al. Magnetic targeting of nanotheranostics enhances Cerenkov radiation-induced photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:14971–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b09374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Goel S, et al. Activatable hybrid nanotheranostics for tetramodal imaging and synergistic photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kotagiri N, Sudlow GP, Akers WJ, Achilefu S. Breaking the depth dependency of phototherapy with Cerenkov radiation and low-radiance-responsive nanophotosensitizers. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10:370–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ai X, et al. In vivo covalent cross-linking of photon-converted rare-earth nanostructures for tumour localization and theranostics. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10432. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang C, et al. Marriage of scintillator and semiconductor for synchronous radiotherapy and deep photodynamic therapy with diminished oxygen dependence. Angew Chem. 2015;54:1770–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201408472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Duan D, et al. Activating TiO(2) nanoparticles: gallium-68 serves as a high-yield photon emitter for Cerenkov-induced photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:5278–86. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b17902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kamkaew A, et al. Cerenkov radiation induced photodynamic therapy using chlorin e6-loaded hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:26630–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaffer TM, Pratt EC, Grimm J. Utilizing the power of Cerenkov light with nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12:106–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cai P, et al. A chlorin-lipid nanovesicle nucleus drug for amplified therapeutic effects of lung cancer by internal radiotherapy combined with the Cerenkov radiation-induced photodynamic therapy. Biomater Sci. 2020;8:4841–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00778a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu B, et al. A “Missile-Detonation” strategy to precisely supply and efficiently amplify Cerenkov radiation energy for cancer theranostics. Adv Mater. 2019;31:e1904894. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904894.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xia Y, et al. Engineering macrophages for cancer immunotherapy and drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2020;32:e2002054. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002054.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Boorn JG, Dassler J, Coch C, Schlee M, Hartmann G. Exosomes as nucleic acid nanocarriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:331–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Dommelen SM, et al. Microvesicles and exosomes: opportunities for cell-derived membrane vesicles in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2012;161:635–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lunavat TR, et al. RNAi delivery by exosome-mimetic nanovesicles—implications for targeting c-Myc in cancer. Biomaterials. 2016;102:231–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Molinaro R, et al. Biomimetic proteolipid vesicles for targeting inflamed tissues. Nat Mater. 2016;15:1037–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4644.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan S, Wu T, Zhang D, Zhang Z. Cell or cell membrane-based drug delivery systems. Theranostics. 2015;5:863–81. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.11852.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Choo YW, et al. M1 macrophage-derived nanovesicles potentiate the anticancer efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. ACS Nano. 2018;12:8977–93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b02446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang H, et al. Biomimetic oxygen delivery nanoparticles for enhancing photodynamic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00827-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li M, et al. Red blood cell membrane-coated upconversion nanoparticles for pretargeted multimodality imaging of triple-negative breast cancer. Biomater Sci. 2020;8:1802–14. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00029a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fang H, et al. Ultra-sensitive Nanoprobe Modified with Tumor Cell Membrane for UCL/MRI/PET Multimodality Precise Imaging of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Nanomicro Lett. 2020;12:62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-0396-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. The U.S. Food and drug administration. 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (5-ALA HCl). 2017. https://www.fda.gov/media/104876/download.

  24. Khaled YS, Wright K, Melcher A, Jayne D. Anti-cancer effects of oncolytic viral therapy combined with photodynamic therapy in human pancreatic cancer cell lines. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 1):S56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60371-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li A, et al. Boosting 5-ALA-based photodynamic therapy by a liposomal nanomedicine through intracellular iron ion regulation. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11:1329–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kessels J, Hendriks J, Nelemans P, Mosterd K, Kelleners-Smeets N. Two-fold illumination in topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) for superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC): a retrospective case series and cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:899–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu X, et al. Broaden sources and reduce expenditure: tumor-specific transformable oxidative stress nanoamplifier enabling economized photodynamic therapy for reinforced oxidation therapy. Theranostics. 2020;10:10513–30. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.49731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Thorek DL, et al. Cerenkov imaging—a new modality for molecular imaging. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;2:163–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng H, et al. Mitochondria and plasma membrane dual-targeted chimeric peptide for single-agent synergistic photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials. 2019;188:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li SY, et al. Cancer cell membrane-coated biomimetic platform for tumor targeted photodynamic therapy and hypoxia-amplified bioreductive therapy. Biomaterials. 2017;142:149–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.07.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mol JA, Visser TJ. Synthesis and some properties of sulfate esters and sulfamates of iodothyronines. Endocrinology. 1985;117:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-117-1-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Qi S, et al. Hypocrellin A-based photodynamic action induces apoptosis in A549 cells through ROS-mediated mitochondrial signaling pathway. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9:279–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Martins WK, et al. Parallel damage in mitochondria and lysosomes is an efficient way to photoinduce cell death. Autophagy. 2019;15:259–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1515609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Eberlein U, et al. DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of thyroid cancer patients after radioiodine therapy. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:173–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.164814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang J, et al. gamma-H2AX responds to DNA damage induced by long-term exposure to combined low-dose-rate neutron and gamma-ray radiation. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2016;795:36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.11.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McCluskey AG, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase enhances the toxicity of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine/topotecan combination therapy to cells and xenografts that express the noradrenaline transporter. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1146–54. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.095943.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gachechiladze M, Skarda J, Soltermann A, Joerger M. RAD51 as a potential surrogate marker for DNA repair capacity in solid malignancies. Int J Cancer. 2017;141:1286–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30764.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yong T, et al. Tumor exosome-based nanoparticles are efficient drug carriers for chemotherapy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11718-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Fang RH, et al. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for anticancer vaccination and drug delivery. Nano Lett. 2014;14:2181–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl500618u.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Osta WA, et al. EpCAM is overexpressed in breast cancer and is a potential target for breast cancer gene therapy. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5818–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shao D, et al. Bioinspired diselenide-bridged mesoporous silica nanoparticles for dual-responsive protein delivery. Adv Mater. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201801198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rao L, et al. Cancer cell membrane-coated upconversion nanoprobes for highly specific tumor imaging. Adv Mater. 2016;28:3460–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201506086.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Qu Y, et al. Cancer-cell-biomimetic nanoparticles for targeted therapy of multiple myeloma based on bone marrow homing. Adv Mater. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202107883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lo Cicero A, Stahl PD, Raposo G. Extracellular vesicles shuffling intercellular messages: for good or for bad. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;35:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2015.04.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu Y, et al. Tumor exosomal RNAs promote lung pre-metastatic niche formation by activating alveolar epithelial TLR3 to recruit neutrophils. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:243–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2016.06.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Qian R, et al. Multi-antitumor therapy and synchronous imaging monitoring based on exosome. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05696-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu X, et al. Recent advances in cell membrane camouflage-based biosensing application. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;194:113623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tang Z, Zhao P, Wang H, Liu Y, Bu W. Biomedicine meets fenton chemistry. Chem Rev. 2021;121:1981–2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Izci M, Maksoudian C, Manshian BB, Soenen SJ. The Use of alternative strategies for enhanced nanoparticle delivery to solid tumors. Chem Rev. 2021;121:1746–803. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ding H, et al. Erythrocyte membrane-coated NIR-triggered biomimetic nanovectors with programmed delivery for photodynamic therapy of cancer. Nanoscale. 2015;7:9806–15. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr02470f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hu C-MJ, Fang RH, Luk BT, Zhang L. Nanoparticle-detained toxins for safe and effective vaccination. Nat Nanotechnol. 2013;8:933–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Deng Y, et al. 3-bromopyruvate-conjugated nanoplatform-induced pro-death autophagy for enhanced photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor. ACS Nano. 2020;14:9711–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c01350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu T, et al. Efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy against keloid compromised by downregulation of SIRT1-SIRT3-SOD2-mROS dependent autophagy pathway. Redox Biol. 2019;20:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.10.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071966 and 81771866). We would like to thank Ms. Guang-Xin Wang and Ms. Yan Wang at The Analysis and Testing Center of Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences for discussion and comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071966 and 81771866).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ruijie Qian and Kun Wang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1277 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Ruijie Qian, Kun Wang, Hongyan Li, Ziyang Zhu, Xiaojuan Huang, Chengpeng Gong, Yu Gao, Rong Guo, Biao Yang, Chenyang Wang, Dawei Jiang, Xiaoli Lan, Rui An & Zairong Gao

  2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Ruijie Qian, Kun Wang, Hongyan Li, Ziyang Zhu, Chengpeng Gong, Yu Gao, Rong Guo, Biao Yang, Chenyang Wang, Dawei Jiang, Xiaoli Lan, Rui An & Zairong Gao

  3. Department of Oncology, Tongji Medical College, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

    Yawen Guo

  4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310000, China

    Xiaojuan Huang

Authors
  1. Ruijie Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yawen Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongyan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ziyang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xiaojuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chengpeng Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yu Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Rong Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Biao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chenyang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dawei Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiaoli Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Rui An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Zairong Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZRG and RA contributed to the design and supervision of this study. RJQ and KW performed the experiments. YWG and ZYZ analyzed the data and interpretation. LXL, DWJ, HYL, XJH, CPG and YG provided suggestions and technical support for this study. RJQ, KW, RG and CYW wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rui An or Zairong Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental schemes were performed under the guidance and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Balb/c mice (female, 5–6 weeks old) purchased from Weitong Lihua Laboratory Animal Center (Beijing, China), and maintained in a pathogen-free environment. Extensive efforts were made to ensure minimal suffering of the animals used during the study.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to be published.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Full radiochemical purity data of 131I-EM@ALA in PBS (a) and FBS (b). Figure S2. WB protein identification photograph of 4T1 lysate, EM, and EM@ALA. Figure S3. SPECT/CT imaging (left) and distribution (right) study were performed at 24 h after injection of 131I-EM@ALA injection. Figure S4. Cerenkov radiation imaging with different concentration of 131I without PpIX. Figure S5. Cerenkov radiation imaging in different kinds of solutions with different filters. Figure S6. Effect of 131I-EM@ALA treatment on apoptotic-related proteins in liver (a), and autophagy-related proteins (P62 and LC3) in 4T1 cell (b) and 4T1 tumor tissue (c) determined by western blot.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, R., Wang, K., Guo, Y. et al. Minimizing adverse effects of Cerenkov radiation induced photodynamic therapy with transformable photosensitizer-loaded nanovesicles. J Nanobiotechnol 20, 203 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01401-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01401-0

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us