Skip to main content

Biomedical application of 2D nanomaterials in neuroscience

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials, such as graphene, black phosphorus and transition metal dichalcogenides, have attracted increasing attention in biology and biomedicine. Their high mechanical stiffness, excellent electrical conductivity, optical transparency, and biocompatibility have led to rapid advances. Neuroscience is a complex field with many challenges, such as nervous system is difficult to repair and regenerate, as well as the early diagnosis and treatment of neurological diseases are also challenged. This review mainly focuses on the application of 2D nanomaterials in neuroscience. Firstly, we introduced various types of 2D nanomaterials. Secondly, due to the repairment and regeneration of nerve is an important problem in the field of neuroscience, we summarized the studies of 2D nanomaterials applied in neural repairment and regeneration based on their unique physicochemical properties and excellent biocompatibility. We also discussed the potential of 2D nanomaterial-based synaptic devices to mimic connections among neurons in the human brain due to their low-power switching capabilities and high mobility of charge carriers. In addition, we also reviewed the potential clinical application of various 2D nanomaterials in diagnosing and treating neurodegenerative diseases, neurological system disorders, as well as glioma. Finally, we discussed the challenge and future directions of 2D nanomaterials in neuroscience.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Recently, nanomaterial-based approaches opened up the new potential strategies in the field of neuroscience [1, 2]. Among biomaterials, research on two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials has been of great attraction. At present, many types of 2D nanomaterials with different structures and physicochemical properties have been developed, such as graphene, black phosphorous (BP), layered double hydroxides (LDHs), transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), and transition metal carbides (TMCs) [3]. Moreover, many 2D nanomaterials have been applied for synaptic modulation, neuroinflammatory reduction, stem cell fate regulation, and injured neural cell/tissue repairment [1, 4, 5]. The nervous system is difficult to repair and regenerate, which is vulnerable to be permanently damaged from injury and disease. The 2D nanomaterials have unique physicochemical properties and excellent biocompatibility to modulate proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells [6,7,8,9]. Therefore, the application of 2D nanomaterials opens up new therapeutic approaches for neural repair and regeneration. Because of the unique properties of 2D nanomaterials that different from bulk materials, such as the electronic, optoelectronic, electrochemical and mechanical properties, they also are good materials for artificial synaptic devices. For example, graphene was initially thought to be cytotoxic, but its high biocompatibility is widely used in artificial synaptic devices [10]. BP as a new emerging 2D semiconductor material having a series of advantages, such as the thickness-dependent bandgap, excellent biocompatibility, and high charge-carrier mobility [11, 12]. TMDCs-based field-effect transistors (FETs) have an ultrahigh Ion/Ioff ratio and good mobility, which can be assembled into low-power electronics. Recently, 2D nanomaterials also attracted much attention in the fields of detection and targeting neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) relying on their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [1]. In addition, in neurological system diseases, 2D nanomaterials also exert great potential through their high surface area, high affinity, and drug delivery functions, effectively inhibiting the inflammatory response after nervous system trauma, and promoting the repair of nervous system damage [13, 14]. The excellent properties of 2D nanomaterials make them also have great potential in the diagnosis and treatment of glioma [15]. Here, we reviewed the most recent studies on various 2D nanomaterials used in neural repairment and regeneration, artificial synapse, and neurological disorders, hoping it could offer an overall understanding of the application of 2D nanomaterials in neuroscience.

Overview of 2D nanomaterials

2D nanomaterials are a type of material with a thickness of only a single or few atomic layers, and the electrons to move freely in the other two dimensions outside of nanoscale (< 100 nm). The excellent physicochemical and biological properties have led to their extensive application in the tissue engineering and regenerative medicine field. 2D nanomaterials mainly includes graphene, graphene derivatives, BP, LDHs, TMDCs, and TMCs, which have extensively applied in the tissue engineering and regenerative medicine field [2, 16, 17]. Table 1 summarized the biomedical applications of each material.

Table 1 Biomedical applications of 2D nanomaterials

Graphene and its derivatives

Graphene is the first discovered 2D nanomaterial with perfect physical and chemical properties, consists of a two-dimensional monolayer of sp2-bonded carbon atom covalently in a hexagonal lattice [54]. A variety of functionalized forms of graphene-based nanomaterials (GBNs) have been developed and well-studied, mainly including graphene, graphene oxide (GO), carboxyl graphene, and reduced GO (RGO) [55]. As a result of graphene and its oxidized derivatives combine unique properties such as high electronic and thermal conductivities and mechanical strength [56], it has potential applications in wide fields [57, 58], such as biomedicine [59, 60] and artificial synapses [61]. Although graphene is cytotoxic, the non-toxic, biocompatible and water-dispersible graphene layers produced through chemical functionalization can be highly beneficial for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications [62].

TMDCs

In recent years, a newly emerged kind of 2D nanomaterial, 2D TMDCs has obtained much attention. TMDCs’s generalization formula is MX2, comprised of a transition metal atoms (M) sandwiched between two layers of chalcogen atoms (X). Typically, TMDCs include molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2), and tungsten disulfide (WS2). There is a strong covalent bond between layers of tungsten diselenide, but the van der Waals forces between the layers are weak due to their resemblance with graphene [63]. The band gap energy of 2D TMDCs changes with the constituent elements, and even without surface modification, the properties of graphene alter with the changes in the constituent elements [64]. 2D TMDCs are more widely used than graphene in many fields due to their special structure and photoelectric properties. MoS2 as a typical layered 2D TMDC has received much attention due to its unique physicochemical, biological and optical properties [65]. TMDCs also attracted numerous attentions for many kinds of applications, such as drug delivery [30] and artificial synapses [66].

BP

BP is a type of new 2D nanomaterials discovered on top of graphene. Although bulk BP was first synthesized over 100 years ago, the thin-film BP was not discovered until 2014 [67]. BP is one of the most stable allotropes of phosphorus. At present, the known crystal structure types of BP can be mainly divided into four types: simple cubic, orthogonal, rhombic, and amorphous [68]. The thickness of the synthesized BP was 1–2 nm which is about 1–2 layers, and its pore size was between several nanometers and dozens of nanometers [69]. Although BP is considered as a novel 2D material compared to graphene, it is more stable, and has an inherent and perceptible band gap. Multi–channel dynamic sensing measurements showed that BP had high sensitivity, selectivity, and a fast response ability compared to other 2D sensing material [70,71,72,73]. Owing to its excellent properties that are similar to graphene, BP has recently attracted increasing attention for a variety of applications, especially in optoelectronics [74,75,76] and biomedicine, such as photothermal therapy [77], photodynamic therapy [78], artificial synapses [79], drug delivery, theranostics [77], neural repair and regeneration [8, 80].

LDHs

Due to the attractive morphological features and tunable physicochemical characteristics, the 2D LDHs have drawn the attention of researchers among various inorganic-based nanobiomaterials [81, 82]. LDHs are composed of a positively charged brucite-like layer containing M(OH)6 octahedra and an interlayer gallery containing anions and water molecules [83], which are formed by stacking layers of mixed hydroxides of bivalent and trivalent cations, containing hydrated organic or inorganic anions between the layers. LDHs nanohybrids are formed by the encapsulation of diverse anionic species in the interlayer gallery space, including drugs and anionic supramolecular constituents [84]. LDHs are able to interact with organic molecules through anion exchange and, in this way, the anions in the interlayer space are exchanged for other substances of interest. This exchange is characterized by a phenomenon called intercalation and it has several purposes [85]. More importantly, the high chemical stability, pH-dependent biodegradability, and ease of surface modification make LDHs more suitable for biomedical applications [86].

TMCs

TMCs and nitrides are a kind of 2D materials which are abbreviated as MXenes [87]. MXenes are composed of TMCs, and either nitrides or carbonitrides. They share a general formula of Mn + 1Xn (n = 1–3), where M is an early transition metal (e.g. Sc, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr, Mo), and X is a carbon or nitrogen. MXenes combine the metallic conductivity of transition metal carbides/nitrides with the hydrophilicity of their hydroxyl/oxygen/fluorine terminated surfaces in the presence of both complete metal atomic layers and plentiful surface functional groups [88]. This endows MXenes with excellent conductivity, electromagnetic shielding performance and photothermal conversion performance [89, 90]. These tempting properties make MXenes have a wide range of applications in catalysis [91], batteries [92], sensing [93], neural repair and regeneration [94], and therapy [95].

Other 2D nanomaterials

Apart from the aforementioned nanomaterials, many other 2D nanomaterials including metal–organic framework (MOF) nanosheets and self-assembled 2D nanomaterials were reported contributing to the field of neural regeneration and repair [96].

2D MOF nanosheets have several advantages, such as high purity, ultrathin layer thickness, well refined surface area, abundant exposed unsaturated metal sites, and adjustable chemical composition compared with their 3D counterpart [97]. The drug-loading capacity of 2D MOF nanosheets make them beneficial to be applied in drug delivery and tissue engineering.

Self-assembled 2D nanomaterials with unique physical and chemical properties providing flexible structures and biofunctions compared to inorganic 2D materials, which promote their applications in neural repair and regeneration [1].

In summary, the compatibility and degradability-assisted toxicity issues of various inorganic materials can be addressed considerably by fabricating hybridized structures with the organic components, small size, and reasonable surface functionalization, these nanomaterials appear to be less harmful and possess excellent biocompatibility. The currently available results support further development of these nanomaterials in clinical studies [55].

Application of 2D materials in neural repair and synaptic simulation

2D nanomaterials in neural repair and regeneration

In the field of neuroscience, it is generally believed that the nervous system has a poor ability to regenerate axonal connections after injury or under disease conditions, and there is currently no effective way to promote the regeneration of nerve cells and the reconstruction of damaged neural pathways [98]. In addition, since the difficulty of drugs reaching nerve damaged areas through the BBB, the design of effective drug delivery systems and implants is also one of the challenges that need to be overcome in the field of neural repair and regeneration. Therefore, the repair and regeneration of the human nervous system is very difficult and is vulnerable to permanent damage due to disease or injury. Recently, the repair and regeneration of nerve has become one of the hot research topics. 2D nanomaterials have unique physical and chemical properties, which can provide more drug loading and good biocompatibility, and have been extensively studied in the field of neural repair and regeneration and have opened up potential therapeutic approaches (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Application of 2D nanomaterials for neural repair and regeneration. The 2D nanomaterials including graphene, BP, TMDCs, LDH, etc. Their roles include promoting nerve cell proliferation and differentiation, stimulating nerve cells to secrete more nerve growth factors, and serving as a drug delivery system to treat NDs.

GBNs in the neural repair and regeneration

GBNs are a promising class of 2D nanomaterials. Their excellent electrical conductivity and good biocompatibility make them ideal candidates for neural tissue engineering. Niu et al. revealed that the conductive film composed of graphene and silk fibroin can significantly promote the differentiation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into neurons after iPSCs were inoculated on it. Moreover, the degree of neural differentiation increased with greater quantities of graphene content, and reached the best effect when the graphene content was 4% [7]. There may be a mechanism by which graphene was capable of transmitting electrical stimulation signals and stimulating neuronal differentiation and extension. A recent study found that graphene substrates as cell scaffolds with appropriate electrical stimulation can dramatically increase the number of cells [6]. Supporting cell adhesion and promoting cell proliferation were the main mechanisms by which graphene substrates work [99], showing great potential in regenerative medicine.

Additionally, GBNs can act as nanocomposite carriers for promoting nerve regeneration by delivering drugs to the neural cells (Fig. 2a). To cultivate neural progenitor cells (NPCs), Wang and colleagues created functional scaffolds composed of Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanofiber pads coated with GO and methylene blue (MB) [100]. Although MB has a neuroprotective effect [101] and PLGA is widely used in neural tissue engineering [102], the low compatibility between PLGA and MB prevents them from playing corresponding roles. The result showed that GO coating can greatly strengthen the discharge of MB on the scaffolds, thus improving the ability of NPCs to deal with disease stressors, which provides a possible treatment strategy for NDs [100]. In addition, Qi et al. fixed IGF-1 on PLGA/GO electrospun nanofibers to study the neuroprotective effect of nerve implants. The results indicated that GO greatly enhanced the connection of IGF-1 to the surface of biomaterials, and had the effects of supporting the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells (NSCs) [103]. PLGA/GO electrospun nanofibers, as a nanocomposite carrier for immobilizing IGF-1, showed excellent potential in neuroprotection, but its possible mechanism remains to be further studied.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The graphene-based nanomaterials act as nanocomposite carriers for promoting nerve regeneration. (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of PLGA/GO/IGF-1 nanofibrous scaffold and its application in NSCs culture. PLGA/GO/IGF-1 nanofibrous scaffold significantly increased the proliferation and differentiation of NSCs. (b) Schematic illustration of BP nanosheets reduce the generation of ROS by capturing Cu ions for NDs treatment. (bi) Cu ions catalyze the production of ROS, which destroys organelles and leads to the occurrence of NDs. (bii) BP passes the BBB and captures Cu2+, reducing ROS production and protecting organelles from destruction. Copper on BP nanosheets is mainly in the form of Cu+

GBNs can also induce the behavior of neural cells. Graphene substrates have been shown to support neural cell adhesion, which in turn promotes cell reproduction [6]. Similarly, Wang et al. found that the number of nerve regeneration factors secreted by neural cells cultured on silk-graphene hybrid hydrogel was significantly increased, and the axon length and proportion of cells also increased slightly [104]. These results indicated that GBNs effectively induce the behavior of neural cells, providing more options for basic and applied research related to neural regeneration.

BP in the neural repair and regeneration

BP, a new member of the 2D nanomaterial family, has recently aroused great interest among scientists because of its special physical and chemical properties such as good biodegradability and biocompatibility. Xu et al. designed a double-layer hydrogel platform combined with magnesium-modified BP nanosheets. The experimental results showed that compared with the magnesium-modified double-layer hydrogel platform, it up-regulated the expression of neural-related proteins in NSCs, and significantly promoted the growth of axons in PC12 cells [8]. On this basis, Jing et al. added magnesium-modified BP to methacrylic gelatin to create photosensitive conductive hydrogels, which enabled Schwann cells to secrete more neural growth factors and promote the regeneration of neural fibers [9]. Through these novel strategies, BP is positioned to have a bright future in the field of research on neural repair and regeneration.

The increased level of transition metal ions in cells is a key pathogenic factor in the occurrence and development of many NDs [105]. Phosphorus has the ability to strongly bind to metal ions and can be used as a neuroprotective nano-drug to treat NDs. Chen et al. [106] found that BP nanosheets can cross the BBB, selectively capture Cu2+ in the human body, and act as neuroprotectants against Cu2+-induced neurotoxicity (Fig. 2b). These exciting results make BP nanosheets a promising therapeutic option for neuro-related diseases.

BP has great potential in drug transportation because of its high specific surface area and non-toxic degradation. Currently, it is mainly used in the treatment of cancer [107, 108], with only a small amount of research on the therapeutic effect of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Jin and colleagues [109] designed a BP drug delivery system containing fluoxetine for the treatment of depression. The results indicated that the system can induce the changes of antidepressant-like cells and shorten the treatment time of depression, which may be a rapid and effective antidepressant pathway.

Other kinds of 2D nanomaterials in the neural repair and regeneration

TMDCs share many similarities with graphene, making them promising nanomaterials for neural repair and regeneration. Wang et al. [110] synthesized and characterized MoS2 thin films (MTF), which significantly stimulated NSC proliferation, and induced NSCs to differentiate into neurons and neuroglial cells. In addition, Sun and his colleagues [94] fabricated MoS2@PEG (PEG = polyethylene glycol) as an effective drug carrier of enalapril in the treatment of spinal cord injury (SCI). The results showed that MoS2@PEG can protect the surviving motor neurons and promote the recovery of motor function in mice, which provided the possibility for MoS2 to be used as a drug carrier in neural-related diseases.

Because of its superior biocompatibility and minimal cytotoxicity in cellular and animal systems, LDH has been extensively applied in the biomedical area. Wu et al. [111] reported that LDH nanoparticles (LDH NPs) increased self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) via activating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. He et al. [112] conducted further research based on this and confirmed that LDH NPs have the capacity to boost the expression levels of genes and proteins related to the self-renewal of mESC, and the possible mechanism is that LDH NPs maintain the pluripotency of ESCs through the LIFR/PI3K/AKT signal pathway. These studies indicated LDH is an ideal material for neural repair and regeneration.

2D nanomaterials in artificial synaptic simulation

In 2013, Bichler et al. [113] introduced a single nanoparticle organic memory field effect transistor (NOMFET) that behaved similarly to memristors and exhibited the primary behavior of biospiking synapses. This device, also known as the synaptic transistor, was used to display associative memory of Pavlovian learning. Since then, attention has been turned to design synaptic devices [5], and artificial synapses and synaptic electronics have been developed.

The 2D structure materials are known as good materials for artificial synaptic devices existing electronic, optoelectronic, electrochemical and mechanical properties that the bulk materials do not have. Artificial synaptic devices are one of the key components in constructing neuromorphic computing systems. Their main function is to simulate various synaptic plasticity of biological synapses, such as excitatory post-synaptic current (EPSC), inhibitory post-synaptic current (IPSC), short-term depression (STD) and paired pulse facilitation (PPF) [114]. These synaptic properties can also be simulated by basic electronic components such as memristors at two-terminal synapses [115] or transistors structures with three or more terminals [116], and their performance features are often closely related to the 2D nanomaterial systems used, three-terminal artificial synapses have the merits of concurrently transmitting signals and learning. Inorganic and organic electronic synapses have mimicked plasticity and learning. Optoelectronic synapses and photonic synapses have the prospective benefits of low electrical energy loss, high bandwidth, and mechanical robustness [115].

The rising of next-generation computer systems that mimic biological brains has led to an increase in the research of neurobehavior and autonomous learning, which offers a path to neuromorphic engineering [117]. Neuromorphic computer systems that simulate neurons and synaptic transistors is costly because of the lack of suitable materials. In order to further improve the efficiency of neuromorphic computing system construction, the research direction has shifted from equivalent circuits to the simulation of biological synaptic devices. In the process of biological synaptic device research, to conduct a large amount of complex information in different environments and realize high density parallel neural network with low power consumption, it is found that nanomaterials with optical, electrical and chemical properties can be used in artificial synapses [118]. Here, we summarized the applications of 2D nanomaterials in artificial synapses (Fig. 3), including graphene [61, 119], BP [79], and TMDCs [66, 120,121,122] with ultra-high electrical conductivity.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Application of 2D nanomaterials for artificial synaptic simulation. (a) A schematic diagram of a biological synapse. (b) The artificial synaptic device represents the structure of the memristor. Pressure sensors replace sensory receptors, and memristors based on various nanomaterials simulate various synaptic behaviors. Above and below the memristor are electrode layers, and the middle switching layer can be composed of graphene, BP, TMDCs, etc.

Graphene in artificial synaptic simulation

Although graphene was initially thought to be cytotoxic, it has gained trust in the medical community as a highly biocompatible substrate. Kireev et al. [10] developed a biocompatible bilayer graphene-based artificial synaptic transistors (BLAST) based on the previous large-scale graphene electronic tattoos (GETs), which can mimic synaptic behavior. The BLAST devices leverage a dry ion-selective membrane enabling long-term potentiation (LTP), at least an order of magnitude lower than previous reports on 2D material-based artificial synapses.

Graphene is also combined with other materials to form heterogeneous structures involving in the regulation of artificial synapses. Graphene/Ta2O5/graphene phototransistor exhibits synapse characteristics when visible electromagnetic radiation illuminates the device or positive gate voltage is applied to the device. This device exhibits distinct conductance states modulated by different parameters of incident light, such as the width and number of pulses. The conductance state can be retained for 104 s, indicating LTP, similar to biological synapses [123].

GO was synthesized by the method of liquid phase exfoliation and electrochemical exfoliation on the basis of graphene [124,125,126]. GO is a promising material with excellent downscaling and compatible with conventional silicon-based devices due to atomically thin and weak van der Waals forces between layers [127]. Furthermore, the band gap of GO can be modulated by controlling the functional groups on the surface, which would allow one to control the electrical properties.

BP in artificial synaptic simulation

In comparison to graphene, BP as a new emerging 2D semiconductor material exists a series of advantages, such as the thickness-dependent bandgap, excellent biocompatibility, and high charge-carrier mobility [11, 12], which has been attracted more and more attentions. Yuan et al. [128] reported that the robust and low-power-consumption artificial-synaptic based on BP was successfully manufactured. At the same time, it solved the problem of the instability of exfoliated 2D BP structures. The synapse devices maintain high stability in the air atmosphere and do not show obvious degradation over 3 months. The obtained devices not only implement the main function of synapses, but also perform the function of dendritic neural synapses and simple logical operations, revealing their very strong learning behavior. To utilize a unique photoresponse in BP, few-layer BP flakes were mechanically exfoliated from a bulk single crystal onto the substrates. Monochromatic optical pulses with different wavelengths are used as synaptic stimulation, which optically mimics excitatory and inhibitory action potentials [129].

High-performance and low-power FETs on the basis of integrated circuit field are widely used in the field of synaptic transistors. 2D materials including BP have shown natural advantages for the further reduction in FET sizes due to their natural atomic-level thickness and surface without hanging bonds [130].

TMDCs in artificial synaptic simulation

The mobility of the BP FET is much higher than that of the TMDC FET, however, it is not stable and easily decomposed due to the reaction with water and oxygen in the air. TMDCs (e.g. MoS2 [131], WS2 [132], WSe2, etc.)-based FETs have an ultrahigh Ion/Ioff ratio and good mobility, which can be assembled into low-power electronics. Krishnaprasad et al. [133] demonstrated ultra-low-variability synapses using chemical vapor deposited (CVD) 2D MoS2 as the switching medium with Ti/Au electrodes, which can be used to realize transparent, flexible, ultra-thin memristive synapses for neuromorphic computing.

Application of 2D nanomaterials in neurological disorders

Neurodegenerative diseases

Classically, NDs are believed as a group of chronic, progressive diseases characterized by neuronal degeneration and myelin damage, which lead to morbidity and cognitive impairment in older adults [134]. However, there are difficulties in early diagnosis and treatment of NDs, and obstacles in the BBB, and most of the treatments can only temporarily alleviate symptoms [1, 135]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and Huntington’s disease (HD) are three major types of NDs in the nervous system [136], which are associated with protein misfolding or aggregation. The application of 2D nanomaterials in neurodegenerative diseases or neurological system disorders is mainly reflected in early localization diagnosis and subsequent treatment, and its therapeutic effect is exerted by carrying drugs, siRNA and even cells. We will introduce the applications of 2D nanomaterials in these three diseases in detail below and summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Applications of 2D nanomaterials in neurological disorders

Application of 2D nanomaterials in AD

Defined by the appearance of neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, AD is a genetic and sporadic neurodegenerative disease that causes an amnestic cognitive impairment in its typical neurological manifestations [149, 150]. Although symptomatic, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging tests are now widely used in clinical, AD still cannot be accurately diagnosed at an early stage [151], and the introduction of clinical testing of 2D nanomaterials may improve the diagnosis of AD. In a recent study conducted by Ren et al. [137], triphenyl-phosphonium bromide-conjugated 1,2-stearoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amino (polyethylene glycol)-2000]-functionalized MoS2 quantum dots (TPP-MoS2 QDs) were prepared. MoS2 QDs were competent carriers to load TPP across BBB. The composites of MoS2 QDs mitigated amyloid beta (Aβ) aggregate-mediated neurotoxicity, eliminated Aβ aggregates, and prevented the expression of neuroinflammation factors such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ). Mitochondria-targeted enzymes and M1/M2 microglial polarization of MoS2 QDs in sera indicated it is a potential candidate to treat AD. In another study, Yang et al. [138] developed an Aβ inhibitor (LK7)-coupled and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-stabilized BP-based nanosystem with high-absorption, large-surface, and conductive. The PEGylated LK7-BP nanosheets (PEG-LK7@BP) are designed to enhance inhibitory potency on Aβ42 fibrillogenesis in SH-SY5Y cells [152]. This study showed that the conversion of random coils into sheet structures in Aβ42 was suppressed by the presence of PEG-LK7@BP. Further, both of the in vivo and in vitro results of AD models demonstrated that the multi-target therapy of dauricine delivered by GO can protect SH-SY5Y cells from oxidative stress and increase superoxide dismutase levels, as well as relieve cognitive memory deficits and brain glial cells activation in mice [139].

Application of 2D nanomaterials in PD

As a result of a pathophysiologic degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra of the midbrain and the development of neuronal Lewy Bodies, PD is characterized by bradykinesia with rigidity and tremor, with bilateral involvement [153]. Although there are studies proposed PD is probably caused by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantial nigra [154], there is no consensus on the pathogenesis of PD at present, and the cause of PD remains unclear. Applying nanomaterials to detect lesions has been regarded as useful tools for the early diagnosis of NDs. In the study by Aziz et al. [140], NiAl LDHs were combined with monolayers of graphene layer by layer (NiAl LDH/G LBL) to track dopamine (DA) from the neuronal cells in real time. This study demonstrated the potential for NiAl LDH/G LBL to serve as a determination window for DA-based PD diagnosis. In addition, prussian blue nanoparticle-supported MoS2 nanocomposites (MoS2-CPBNPs) are also considered as potential DA probes, but it is lack of supports for the in vitro or in vivo experimental results [141]. The potential application of BP in PD treatment was reported by Xiong et al. [142]. BP containing the brain-targeting ligand lactoferrin and loaded with Paeoniflorin (Lf-BP-Pae) was implanted into SH-SY5Y cells or PD model mice. The treatment results showed that the neuronal damage was inhibited, and near-infrared irradiation increased the translocation abilities of Lf-BP-Pae across the BBB. This study provided a novel approach of drug delivery to treat and prevent PD, as well as other NDs.

Application of 2D nanomaterials in HD

Huntington’s disease, also known as chorea, is a hereditary disease with neurodegeneration as a pathological change, which is mainly manifested by involuntary dance-like movements of the upper limbs and head, accompanied by symptoms such as decreased muscle tone [155]. Wong et al. [143] engineered LDH nanoparticles via electrospinning, which had a great ability to deliver small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) through the BBB. LHD scaffolds with siRNAs could promote the ability of siRNAs to target and destroy specific mRNAs, making them particularly useful for treating HD as well as other neurodegenerative conditions. Jin et al. [144] prepared a small, single-layer GO nanomaterial that enhanced the clearance of mutant huntingtin (Htt), the aggregate-prone protein involved in HD pathogenesis. The autophagy induced by GO degraded the expression of LC3-II and Htt, activated class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase as well as MEK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways. Furthermore, GO increased Htt’s ubiquitination, which is necessary for Htt’s clearance. GO exhibited a novel biological function in this study and may have implications for the development of neurodegenerative disease therapies based on nanomaterials.

Application of 2D nanomaterials in other NDs

There are many types of NDs in addition to the aforementioned, such as a series of motor neuron diseases represented by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) that manifest as protein degeneration, with TDP-43 proteinopathies as the characteristic pathological manifestation [134]. Medina et al. encapsulated adapalene within nanoparticles (Adap-NPs) composed of poly(lactic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLA-PEG). And they finally demonstrated that intravenous administration of Adap-NPs robustly activates retinoid signaling in the CNS, available as a novel nanoparticle platform for the treatment of ALS. The use of nanomaterials improves the efficacy and uses its stealth properties to increase the residence time of adapalene in vivo, thereby exerting the function of a neuroprotector [156]. In addition, calcium phosphate lipids carrying SOD1-ASO [157] and PEGylated polyethyleneimine polymers with a plasmid (pVIVO2) [158] were also involved in ALS treatment by reducing mutant SOD1 levels and gene delivery, respectively. Prion’s disease is another irreversible, progressive neurodegenerative disease, also known as cavernous encephalopathy, with a spongiform-sponge like brain as the main pathological feature [159]. Misfolding in prion proteins leads to β-pleated sheets formation from α-helix, which ultimately results in new abnormal protein termed prion [160]. Binyamin et al. tested that the NE form of pomegranate seed oil (PSO) delayed clinical progression in mice with PrP mutations, a mouse model associated with E200K, indicating that nano-PSO can be effective in the delay of onset of neurodegenerative conditions such as Prion’s disease [161].

Traumatic diseases of the nervous system

Among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide of central nervous system (CNS), traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) are two major types of traumatic diseases in the nervous system [162]. Below, we will review the recent studies on the applications of 2D nanomaterials in TBI and SCI, and summarized in Table 2.

Application of 2D nanomaterials in TBI

TBI refers to an injury to the brain caused by an external mechanical force, which results in a temporary or permanent brain impairment [163]. Joo et al. [145] found that biodegradable mesoporous silicon nanoparticles encapsulated with GO nanosheets (GO-pSiNPs) can directly transport the therapeutic siRNA, and effectively silence the targeted genes in vitro. Neuronal cells in vitro and brain injury in vivo were found to be the most specific targets, and targeting was critical to successful gene silencing, which has great potential to be a therapeutic delivery platform based on RNAi. Pradhan et al. [146] designed an injectable hydrogel containing acetylcholine functionalized GO and polyacrylic acid (CFGO). The well-designed nanomaterial can effectively exhibit significant neuro-regeneration potential, promoting fast brain regeneration in mice with sham injuries, and enhancing reactive astrocytes in the hippocampal dentate gyrus after sham injury.

Application of 2D nanomaterials in SCI

SCI refers to damage to the structure and function of the spinal cord due to various causes, resulting in impairment of spinal cord nerve function (such as motor, sensory, sphincter, and autonomic function) below the level of injury [164]. It is a catastrophic injury to the CNS that leads to varying degrees of quadriplegia or paraplegia. Pan et al. [147] designed a PLGA/GO to load IGF-1 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). PLGA/GO-mediated synergistic delivery of IGF-1 and BDNF from the SCI model protected NSCs from oxidative stress, promoting differentiation of NSCs, and enhancing their survival and differentiation. GO is the primary nanomaterial for the treatment of SCI. In the study conducted by Domínguez-Bajo et al. [148], embryonic NPCs were seeded on GO materials in the shape of microfibers (rGO-MFs). Since rGO-MFs had no subacute local toxicity, an experimental rat model of SCI after 4 months of implantation was used to assess their ability to regenerate neural tissue, suggesting that rGO-MF-based scaffolds may promote axonal and vascular regeneration in injured spinal cords. The ability of GO carrying drugs to promote nerve damage repair may be related to the accuracy of graphene providing a better conductivity as well as more accurate drug targets [165].

Application of 2D nanomaterials in glioma

Glioma is the most common primary craniocerebral tumor caused by malignant transformation of glial cells in the brain and spinal cord, which accounts for approximately 80% of all malignant brain tumors [166]. The diagnosis of glioma requires comprehensive consideration and judgment based on the patient’s medical history, symptoms, signs, auxiliary examinations and postoperative pathology, etc. At present, the most commonly performed examinations include cranial CT and MRI [167]. The treatment of glioma includes surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy and so on. For specific treatment, it is necessary to generally evaluate the functional status of the patient, the expected outcome of treatment, the location of the brain tumor, the degree of malignancy and other factors, so as to formulate an individual treatment plan [168]. Nowadays, the development and utilization of 2D nanomaterials is promising, which is expected to open up a new avenue for the diagnosis and treatment of glioma. The accurate tumor treatment strategy based on 2D nanomaterials has been proved to effectively improve the efficiency of tumor treatment at the level of animal experiments, such as achieving precise targeting of tumors and controlled release of drugs, reducing damage to normal tissues, etc. [169].

Diagnosis of glioma

Photoacoustic imaging is a relatively new molecular imaging technique with strong tissue penetration and high spatial resolution, so it is regarded as an effective diagnostic method for glioma. However, the detection of glioma in deeper layers often requires contrast agents with high photoacoustic imaging sensitivity [170]. Liu et al. [171] reported a MoS2 nanosheet composite covalently modified by indocyanine green (ICG), which can significantly improve the sensitivity of photoacoustic imaging [172]. This covalent connection makes it have extremely high light absorption capacity in a wide near-infrared band, which red-shifts the absorption peak of ICG and increases the photothermal/photoacoustic conversion efficiency of ICG (Fig. 4). Using MoS2-ICG as a contrast agent, photoacoustic imaging of glioma in vivo at 3.5 mm below the mouse scalp was effectively visualized, and the imaging depth of this process was nearly two times higher than that of previously reported MoS2 nanosheet contrast agents [173]. Combined with its excellent biocompatibility and outstanding stability, in translational medicine, MoS2-ICG has extensive application prospects for efficient tumor molecular imaging.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Synthesis and application of MoS2-ICG. Using ICG to covalently modify MoS2 nanosheets, this covalent connection makes the composite have extremely high optical absorption capacity in a wide near-infrared band, and photoacoustic imaging can achieve lower background noise and greater penetration depth at longer wavelengths. The complex was applied to in vivo photoacoustic imaging of in situ glioma in mice, demonstrating the high sensitivity for visualization of deep glioma.

Treatment of glioma

As an important derivative of graphene, a new 2D nanomaterial, GO has aroused widespread interest in the field of biomedicine, and has become one of the research hotspots in nanobiomedicine, especially nano-drug delivering [174]. The main advantages of GO [175] as a nano-drug loading system include: (1) super-large specific surface area, which can achieve ultra-high drug loading rate; (2) strong targeting and easy enrichment in tumor sites; (3) functionalized GO has good biocompatibility and stability under physiological conditions. Shen et al. [176] firstly used PEG modified GO as a protein delivery carrier for cell function regulation. Protein drugs have good biological activity and low toxicity, but they are easily degraded by proteases existing in the organism, and cannot be effectively delivered into cells, resulting in a greatly reduced bioavailability, which seriously affects the efficacy of protein drugs [177]. They also found that GO can not only efficiently load proteins, but also effectively protect them from enzymatic hydrolysis. More importantly, GO can deliver different functional proteins into cells to achieve effective regulation of the physiological functions of cells. On this basis, the researchers covalently modified transferrin on the surface of PEGylated GO, so that the drug delivery system can pass through the BBB, and then target delivery of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX) to the glioma site [178]. In vivo experiments showed that the delivery system could precisely deliver DOX to the glioma site, effectively inhibit tumor growth, and significantly prolong the survival time of tumor-bearing rats.

Photothermal therapy (PTT) uses photothermal conversion to generate heat under laser irradiation, and then causes local high temperature to destroy and kill tumor cells to achieve the purpose of treating cancers [179]. Compared with traditional surgery, PTT, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has the advantages of less side effects and better controllability. Novel 2D nanomaterials such as BP have superior light absorption characteristics and efficient thermal conductivity in the near-infrared region, so they have broad application prospects as photothermal therapeutic agents in the PTT of cancers [180]. Sun et al. [181] prepared ultra-small BP nanoparticles (about 2.6 nm in transverse diameter and about 1.5 nm in thickness) by ultrasonically stripping BP crystals. Studies have confirmed that they have good photothermal anti-tumor effects on glioma. Subsequently, some scholars modified BP nanomaterials with photosensitizers to develop composite nanomaterials that can be used for both photothermal and photodynamic anti-tumor effects. For example, Li et al. [78] developed a BP multifunctional nanoparticle (BPNP) for photothermal/photodynamic synergistic therapy of glioma guided by biological imaging, and confirmed the synergistic effect of PEGylated BPNP on PTT and photodynamic therapy (PDT) through in vitro and in vivo studies. Moreover, BPNP has low toxicity according to histological analysis. Recently, Yang et al. [182] also successfully developed a BP composite nanomaterial capable of dual anti-tumor effects on PTT/PDT. Taking advantage of the high specific surface area of BP nanomaterials, the photosensitizer chlorine6 was modified into BP nanomaterials, so that the prepared BP@PEG/Chlorine6 nanocomposites not only have physiological stability, good biocompatibility and tumor targeting, but also have high photothermal conversion efficiency. However, it has been reported that this therapy still inevitably has a certain degree of tissue toxicity, and the skin damage of mice can be observed in the experiment, but its side effects are still within a controllable range [183].

LDH has a positively charged lamellar structure and an interlayer structure that can exchange anions [184]. The existence of the layered structure helps polar organic compounds to reasonably accommodate between the laminates and form various intercalation compounds. The anions between LDH layers can be easily exchanged with other anionic drugs [185]. Therefore, it has been widely used as a carrier for drug delivery, with the advantages of low toxicity, good biocompatibility, slow and controlled release, targeted delivery, biological imaging and so on [49]. Different drugs and molecules can be loaded into LDH to promote nerve repair and regeneration. Although Curcumin (Cur) has good anti-tumor effect on malignant glioma cells, its biological characteristics limit its application [186]. For Cur delivery, Zhang et al. [187] devised a LDH nanocarrier that showed good targeted therapeutic effect on malignant glioma cells. However, the main disadvantage of Cur is low bioavailability and absorption [186], while the synthesized Cur/LDH nanomaterials can inhibit the invasion and migration of glioblastoma cells to normal tissue cells, indicating that LDH can be applied as a drug delivery vehicle for the treatment of glioma.

Miao et al. [188] prepared two-dimensional silicon quantum sheets (Si-QSs) through a scalable method combining chemical removal and cryo-assisted delithiation, which can be used as high-efficient brain photon nanoparticles for in situ glioma therapy. It has excellent photothermal properties among the reported two-dimensional single element materials [181]. More critically, the low toxicity of Si-QSs maintains a balance between stability and degradability, paving the route for practical clinical transformation considering the storage and action of nanomaterials. After intravenous administration of Si-QSs, the in situ brain tumor were effectively suppressed under the accurate control of photoacoustic imaging, and the survival lifespan of tumor-bearing mice was elevated by two times. Atomic-thin Si-QSs with powerful light-trapping capabilities are potential to offer a stable and valid two-dimensional nanoplatform for the treatment of brain diseases.

Conclusions and future directions

2D nanomaterials are a new type of biomaterial with enormous potentials, which has great plasticity and unique ability, and they are of great significance to the development of medicine. Because of its excellent biocompatibility and unique physical and chemical properties, 2D nanomaterials have received extensive attention in the field of neural repair and regeneration. 2D nanomaterials have the ability to regulate the neural differentiation of stem cells and the behavior of neural cells. They can also be used as a major component of the drug delivery system to promote the recovery of the injured nervous system. Although 2D nanomaterials offer a promising possibility for neural repair and regeneration, there is still a long way to go before they can be translated into clinical outcomes. First of all, the application of 2D nanomaterials in neural repair and regeneration mainly conducted for GBNs, with relatively less research on other 2D nanomaterials. Therefore, in addition to GBNs, researchers need to continue to explore the related applications of additional 2D nanomaterials. Meanwhile, although the neural repair and regenerative functions of 2D nanomaterials have been supported by lots of studies in animal models [94, 106, 109], their efficacy and safety in the human body, especially in nervous system, are still subject to further debate. Thus, the biosafety of these 2D nanomaterials in the human body should be thoroughly investigated before clinical application.

Successful use of 2D nanomaterials in the fields of brain-inspired computation significantly boosts the possibility of practical use in synaptic electronics [189]. A variety of nanomaterials, including graphene, BP and TMDCs, were utilized to emulate biological functional behaviors. However, synaptic devices with 2D nanomaterials are still far from the ideal computation unit to emulate biological synapses in human brain. Despite enormous efforts, the mechanism of stability and conductivity needs to be further discovered. The size of the artificial synapses should be reduced to enable high integration on chip and the energy consumption of artificial synapses should also be decreased [190].

The treatment application of 2D nanomaterials in neurological diseases has been widely carried out, but these in vitro and in vivo experiments have not been performed in humans, and the progress of combining 2D nanomaterials with imaging is also unsatisfactory. In addition, current research on 2D nanomaterials in mental illness is also limited except for depression [191]. It is still a long way to go before nanomaterials are widely used in the clinical trial of neurological diseases.

2D nanomaterials have the potential to integrate biological imaging detection, drug delivery systems and direct therapeutic reagents, providing a powerful tool for tumor precision medicine[192]. The multifunctional nanotherapy platform based on 2D nanomaterials has become the growing trend of glioma treatment in the future. However, the research of 2D nanomaterials is still in the preliminary stage, and there are still some challenges for its application in human body [17, 193]. Firstly, the toxicity and biological stability of these nanomaterials in the human body environment are still unclear. The current relevant research is in the stage of in vitro and small animal experiments, and experimental studies in large animals are rarely reported. Secondly, the clinical application of nanocarriers will inevitably face with technical and cost issues in the large-scale production of materials. At present, although the preparation technology of nanocarriers in the laboratory is becoming more and more stable and mature, there are still problems to be solved such as complicated preparation steps, high cost, and low efficiency. Thirdly, most ultrasonic and photoacoustic medical devices that assist nanomaterials in tumor diagnosis and treatment are still in the stage of laboratory research. For example, the imaging depth of currently used photoacoustic imaging devices is only tens of millimeters, which is only suitable for research on small animals. Therefore, the innovation of equipment hardware and software to realize clinical application is very important. Although the current research has certain limitations, it is believed that with the continuous development of biomedical engineering and molecular biology, there will be more breakthroughs in the application of novel 2D nanomaterials in neuroscience.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

2D:

Two-dimensional

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ALS:

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Aβ:

amyloid beta

BBB:

blood-brain barrier

BLAST:

bilayer graphene-based artificial synaptic transistors

BDNF:

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

BP:

black phosphorus

BPNP:

black phosphorus multifunctional nanoparticle

CFGO:

cetylcholine functionalized graphene oxide and polyacrylic acid

CNS:

central nervous system

Cur:

curcumin

CVD:

chemical vapor deposited

DA:

dopamine

DOX:

doxorubicin

EPSC:

excitatory post-synaptic current

ESCs:

embryonic stem cells

FET:

field-effect transistors

GBNs:

Graphene-based nanomaterials

GETs:

graphene electronic tattoos

GO:

graphene oxide

GO-pSiNPs:

silicon nanoparticles encapsulated with graphene oxide nanosheets

HD:

Huntington’s disease

Htt:

huntingtin

ICG:

indocyanine green

IGF-1:

insulin-like growth factor 1

IL-1β:

interleukin-1β

IPSC:

inhibitory post-synaptic current

iPSCs:

induced pluripotent stem cells

LDH NPs:

LDH nanoparticles

LDHs:

layered double hydroxides

Lf-BP-Pae:

BP containing the brain-targeting ligand lactoferrin and loaded with Paeoniflorin

LTP:

long-term potentiation

MB:

methylene blue

MOF:

metal–organic framework nanosheets

MoS2 :

molybdenum disulfide

MoS2-CPBNPs:

prussian blue nanoparticle-supported MoS2 nanocomposites

MoSe2 :

molybdenum diselenide

MTF:

MoS2 thin films

NDs:

neurodegenerative diseases

NiAl LDH/G LBL:

NiAl LDHs were combined with monolayers of graphene layer by layer

NOMFET:

nanoparticle organic memory field effect transistor

NPCs:

neural progenitor cells

NSCs:

neural stem cells

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

PDT:

photodynamic therapy

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

PEG-LK7@BP:

PEGylated LK7-BP nanosheets

PLGA:

Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)

PLGA/GO:

graphene oxide-incorporated poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)

PPF:

paired pulse facilitation

PSO:

pomegranate seed oil

PTT:

Photothermal therapy

RGO:

reduced graphene oxide

rGO-MFs:

graphene oxide materials in the shape of microfibers

SCI:

spinal cord injury

Si QSs:

silicon quantum sheets

siRNAs:

small interfering RNAs

SLN:

solid lipid nanoparticles

STD:

short-term depression

TBI:

traumatic brain injury

TMCs:

transition metal carbides

TMDCs:

transition metal dichalcogenides

TPP-MoS2 QDs:

triphenyl-phosphonium bromide-conjugated 1,2-stearoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amino(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-functionalized MoS2 quantum dots

WS2 :

tungsten disulfide.

References

  1. He X, Zhu Y, Ma B, Xu X, Huang R, Cheng L, Zhu R. Bioactive 2D nanomaterials for neural repair and regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;187:114379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng Y, Hong X, Wang J, Feng L, Fan T, Guo R, Zhang H. 2D nanomaterials for tissue Engineering and Regenerative Nanomedicines: recent advances and Future Challenges. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:e2001743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Halim A, Qu KY, Zhang XF, Huang NP. Recent advances in the application of two-dimensional nanomaterials for neural tissue Engineering and Regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7:3503–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rives V, Del Arco M, Martin C. Layered double hydroxides as drug carriers and for controlled release of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): a review. J Control Release. 2013;169:28–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Yu H, Gong J, Ma M, Han H, Wei H, Xu W. Artificial synapses based on nanomaterials. Nanotechnology. 2019;30:012001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dybowska-Sarapuk L, Sosnowicz W, Grzeczkowicz A, Krzeminski J, Jakubowska M. Ultrasonication effects on graphene composites in neural cell cultures. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:992494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Niu Y, Chen X, Yao D, Peng G, Liu H, Fan Y. Enhancing neural differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells by conductive graphene/silk fibroin films. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106:2973–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu Y, Xu C, He L, Zhou J, Chen T, Ouyang L, Guo X, Qu Y, Luo Z, Duan D. Stratified-structural hydrogel incorporated with magnesium-ion-modified black phosphorus nanosheets for promoting neuro-vascularized bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2022;16:271–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jing X, Xu C, Su W, Ding Q, Ye B, Su Y, Yu K, Zeng L, Yang X, Qu Y et al. Photosensitive and Conductive Hydrogel Induced Innerved Bone Regeneration for Infected Bone Defect Repair. Adv Healthc Mater 2022:e2201349.

  10. Kireev D, Liu S, Jin H, Patrick Xiao T, Bennett CH, Akinwande D, Incorvia JAC. Metaplastic and energy-efficient biocompatible graphene artificial synaptic transistors for enhanced accuracy neuromorphic computing. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hao C, Wen F, Xiang J, Yuan S, Yang B, Li L, Wang W, Zeng Z, Wang L, Liu Z, Tian Y. Liquid-exfoliated black Phosphorous Nanosheet Thin Films for Flexible Resistive Random Access Memory Applications. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:2016–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X, Jones AM, Seyler KL, Tran V, Jia Y, Zhao H, Wang H, Yang L, Xu X, Xia F. Highly anisotropic and robust excitons in monolayer black phosphorus. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10:517–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohammed FS, Omay SB, Sheth KN, Zhou J. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery for the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2023;20:55–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zarepour A, Bal Öztürk A, Koyuncu Irmak D, Yaşayan G, Gökmen A, Karaöz E, Zarepour A, Zarrabi A, Mostafavi E. Combination therapy using nanomaterials and stem cells to treat spinal cord injuries. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2022;177:224–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang T, Zhu Q, Jiang D, Feng X, Feng J, Jiang T, Yao J, Jing Y, Song Q, Jiang X, et al. Synergistic targeting tenascin C and neuropilin-1 for specific penetration of nanoparticles for anti-glioblastoma treatment. Biomaterials. 2016;101:60–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kankala RK. Nanoarchitectured two-dimensional layered double hydroxides-based nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;186:114270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu M, Niu X, Zhang R, Ping Xu Z. Two-dimensional nanomaterials for tumor microenvironment modulation and anticancer therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;187:114360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nayak TR, Andersen H, Makam VS, Khaw C, Bae S, Xu X, Ee PL, Ahn JH, Hong BH, Pastorin G, Özyilmaz B. Graphene for controlled and accelerated osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Nano. 2011;5:4670–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng X, Wan Q, Pei X. Graphene Family materials in bone tissue regeneration: Perspectives and Challenges. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018;13:289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawkowska K, Pokrywczynska M, Koper K, Kluth LA, Drewa T, Adamowicz J. Application of Graphene in Tissue Engineering of the Nervous System. Int J Mol Sci 2021, 23.

  21. Bei HP, Yang Y, Zhang Q, Tian Y, Luo X, Yang M, Zhao X. Graphene-Based Nanocomposites for Neural Tissue Engineering. Molecules 2019, 24.

  22. Girão AF, Serrano MC, Completo A, Marques P. Is graphene shortening the path toward spinal cord regeneration? ACS Nano. 2022;16:13430–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mei X, Hu T, Wang Y, Weng X, Liang R, Wei M. Recent advancements in two-dimensional nanomaterials for drug delivery. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2020;12:e1596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeong WY, Choi HE, Kim KS. Graphene-Based Nanomaterials as Drug Delivery Carriers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1351:109–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Itoo AM, Vemula SL, Gupta MT, Giram MV, Kumar SA, Ghosh B, Biswas S. Multifunctional graphene oxide nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer. J Control Release. 2022;350:26–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li JL, Tang B, Yuan B, Sun L, Wang XG. A review of optical imaging and therapy using nanosized graphene and graphene oxide. Biomaterials. 2013;34:9519–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chung S, Revia RA, Zhang M. Graphene Quantum Dots and their applications in Bioimaging, Biosensing, and Therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33:e1904362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shahriari S, Sastry M, Panjikar S, Singh Raman RK. Graphene and Graphene Oxide as a support for Biomolecules in the development of biosensors. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2021;14:197–220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Prattis I, Hui E, Gubeljak P, Kaminski Schierle GS, Lombardo A, Occhipinti LG. Graphene for Biosensing Applications in Point-of-care testing. Trends Biotechnol. 2021;39:1065–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu T, Wang C, Gu X, Gong H, Cheng L, Shi X, Feng L, Sun B, Liu Z. Drug delivery with PEGylated MoS2 nano-sheets for combined photothermal and chemotherapy of cancer. Adv Mater. 2014;26:3433–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li Z, Wong SL. Functionalization of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;70:1095–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yin W, Yan L, Yu J, Tian G, Zhou L, Zheng X, Zhang X, Yong Y, Li J, Gu Z, Zhao Y. High-throughput synthesis of single-layer MoS2 nanosheets as a near-infrared photothermal-triggered drug delivery for effective cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2014;8:6922–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Murugan C, Sharma V, Murugan RK, Malaimegu G, Sundaramurthy A. Two-dimensional cancer theranostic nanomaterials: synthesis, surface functionalization and applications in photothermal therapy. J Control Release. 2019;299:1–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Derakhshi M, Daemi S, Shahini P, Habibzadeh A, Mostafavi E, Ashkarran AA. Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials beyond Graphene for Biomedical Applications. J Funct Biomater 2022, 13.

  35. Meng S, Zhang Y, Wang H, Wang L, Kong T, Zhang H, Meng S. Recent advances on TMDCs for medical diagnosis. Biomaterials. 2021;269:120471.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu C, Zeng Z, Li H, Li F, Fan C, Zhang H. Single-layer MoS2-based nanoprobes for homogeneous detection of biomolecules. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:5998–6001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Presutti D, Agarwal T, Zarepour A, Celikkin N, Hooshmand S, Nayak C, Ghomi M, Zarrabi A, Costantini M, Behera B, Maiti TK. Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (TMDC)-Based Nanozymes for Biosensing and Therapeutic Applications. Mater (Basel) 2022, 15.

  38. Tayari V, Hemsworth N, Fakih I, Favron A, Gaufrès E, Gervais G, Martel R, Szkopek T. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in a black phosphorus naked quantum well. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Qin L, Jiang S, He H, Ling G, Zhang P. Functional black phosphorus nanosheets for cancer therapy. J Control Release. 2020;318:50–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Y, Zhai D, Xu M, Yao Q, Zhu H, Chang J, Wu C. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with antibacterial and osteogenic activity. Biofabrication. 2017;9:025037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pandey A, Nikam AN, Fernandes G, Kulkarni S, Padya BS, Prassl R, Das S, Joseph A, Deshmukh PK, Patil PO, Mutalik S. Black Phosphorus as Multifaceted Advanced Material Nanoplatforms for Potential Biomedical Applications. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2020, 11.

  42. Ding K, Zeng J, Jing L, Qiao R, Liu C, Jiao M, Li Z, Gao M. Aqueous synthesis of PEGylated copper sulfide nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging of tumors. Nanoscale. 2015;7:11075–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu S, Choi G, Choy JH. Multifunctional Layered Double Hydroxides for Drug Delivery and Imaging. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2023, 13.

  44. Ameena Shirin VK, Sankar R, Johnson AP, Gangadharappa HV, Pramod K. Advanced drug delivery applications of layered double hydroxide. J Control Release. 2021;330:398–426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gu Z, Atherton JJ, Xu ZP. Hierarchical layered double hydroxide nanocomposites: structure, synthesis and applications. Chem Commun (Camb). 2015;51:3024–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hu T, Gu Z, Williams GR, Strimaite M, Zha J, Zhou Z, Zhang X, Tan C, Liang R. Layered double hydroxide-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2022;51:6126–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hu T, Mei X, Wang Y, Weng X, Liang R, Wei M. Two-dimensional nanomaterials: fascinating materials in biomedical field. Sci Bull (Beijing). 2019;64:1707–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Constantino VRL, Figueiredo MP, Magri VR, Eulálio D, Cunha VRR, Alcântara ACS, Perotti GF. Biomaterials Based on Organic Polymers and Layered Double Hydroxides Nanocomposites: Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15.

  49. Munyemana JC, Chen J, Han Y, Zhang S, Qiu H. A review on optical sensors based on layered double hydroxides nanoplatforms. Mikrochim Acta. 2021;188:80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mo L, Li J, Liu Q, Qiu L, Tan W. Nucleic acid-functionalized transition metal nanosheets for biosensing applications. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;89:201–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lin H, Wang X, Yu L, Chen Y, Shi J. Two-dimensional ultrathin MXene ceramic nanosheets for Photothermal Conversion. Nano Lett. 2017;17:384–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dai C, Chen Y, Jing X, Xiang L, Yang D, Lin H, Liu Z, Han X, Wu R. Two-Dimensional Tantalum Carbide (MXenes) Composite Nanosheets for multiple imaging-guided photothermal tumor ablation. ACS Nano. 2017;11:12696–712.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rasool K, Helal M, Ali A, Ren CE, Gogotsi Y, Mahmoud KA. Antibacterial activity of Ti3C2Tx MXene. ACS Nano. 2016;10:3674–84.

  54. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science. 2004;306:666–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Qu Y, He F, Yu C, Liang X, Liang D, Ma L, Zhang Q, Lv J, Wu J. Advances on graphene-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;90:764–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Novoselov KS, Fal’ko VI, Colombo L, Gellert PR, Schwab MG, Kim K. A roadmap for graphene. Nature. 2012;490:192–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS. Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater. 2010;22:3906–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rao CN, Sood AK, Subrahmanyam KS, Govindaraj A. Graphene: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48:7752–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yang K, Feng L, Shi X, Liu Z. Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:530–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Feng L, Liu Z. Graphene in biomedicine: opportunities and challenges. Nanomed (Lond). 2011;6:317–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wan CJ, Liu YH, Feng P, Wang W, Zhu LQ, Liu ZP, Shi Y, Wan Q. Flexible metal Oxide/Graphene Oxide Hybrid Neuromorphic Transistors on Flexible conducting Graphene Substrates. Adv Mater. 2016;28:5878–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Erol O, Uyan I, Hatip M, Yilmaz C, Tekinay AB, Guler MO. Recent advances in bioactive 1D and 2D carbon nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Nanomedicine. 2018;14:2433–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang L, Wang Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Chen A, Wang C, Mo W, Li Y, Yuan Q, Zhang Y. Photon-responsive Antibacterial Nanoplatform for Synergistic Photothermal-/Pharmaco-Therapy of skin infection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:300–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chhowalla M, Shin HS, Eda G, Li LJ, Loh KP, Zhang H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat Chem. 2013;5:263–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yadav U, Mishra H, Singh V, Kashyap S, Srivastava A, Yadav S, Saxena PS. Enhanced osteogenesis by Molybdenum Disulfide Nanosheet Reinforced Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5:4511–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Seo S, Jo SH, Kim S, Shim J, Oh S, Kim JH, Heo K, Choi JW, Choi C, Oh S, et al. Artificial optic-neural synapse for colored and color-mixed pattern recognition. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Li L, Yu Y, Ye GJ, Ge Q, Ou X, Wu H, Feng D, Chen XH, Zhang Y. Black phosphorus field-effect transistors. Nat Nanotechnol. 2014;9:372–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Yuan Z, Liu D, Tian N, Zhang G, Zhang Y. Structure, Preparation and Properties of Phosphorene. Acta Chim Sinica 2016, 74.

  69. Liu H, Lian P, Zhang Q, Yang Y, Mei Y. The preparation of holey phosphorene by electrochemical assistance. Electrochem Commun. 2019;98:124–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Katsnelson MI, Grigorieva IV, Dubonos SV, Firsov AA. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature. 2005;438:197–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Nilges T, Kersting M, Pfeifer T. A fast low-pressure transport route to large black phosphorus single crystals. J Solid State Chem. 2008;181:1707–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Jariwala D, Sangwan VK, Late DJ, Johns JE, Dravid VP, Marks TJ, Lauhon LJ, Hersam MC. Band-like transport in high mobility unencapsulated single-layer MoS2 transistors. Appl Phys Lett 2013, 102.

  73. Cho SY, Lee Y, Koh HJ, Jung H, Kim JS, Yoo HW, Kim J, Jung HT. Superior Chemical sensing performance of Black Phosphorus: comparison with MoS2 and graphene. Adv Mater. 2016;28:7020–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Song Y, Chen S, Zhang Q, Li L, Zhao L, Zhang H, Tang D. Vector soliton fiber laser passively mode locked by few layer black phosphorus-based optical saturable absorber. Opt Express. 2016;24:25933–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Li J, Luo H, Zhai B, Lu R, Guo Z, Zhang H, Liu Y. Black phosphorus: a two-dimension saturable absorption material for mid-infrared Q-switched and mode-locked fiber lasers. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Dana N, Fowler RA, Allen A, Zoldan J, Suggs L, Emelianov S. In vitro photoacoustic sensing of calcium dynamics with Arsenazo III. Laser Phys Lett 2016, 13.

  77. Qiu M, Wang D, Liang W, Liu L, Zhang Y, Chen X, Sang DK, Xing C, Li Z, Dong B, et al. Novel concept of the smart NIR-light-controlled drug release of black phosphorus nanostructure for cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Li Y, Liu Z, Hou Y, Yang G, Fei X, Zhao H, Guo Y, Su C, Wang Z, Zhong H, et al. Multifunctional Nanoplatform based on Black Phosphorus Quantum Dots for Bioimaging and Photodynamic/Photothermal Synergistic Cancer Therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:25098–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Tian H, Guo Q, Xie Y, Zhao H, Li C, Cha JJ, Xia F, Wang H. Anisotropic black phosphorus synaptic device for Neuromorphic Applications. Adv Mater. 2016;28:4991–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Jing X, Xu C, Su W, Ding Q, Ye B, Su Y, Yu K, Zeng L, Yang X, Qu Y, et al. Photosensitive and Conductive Hydrogel Induced Innerved Bone Regeneration for infected bone defect repair. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12:e2201349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Wan AC, Ying JY. Nanomaterials for in situ cell delivery and tissue regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62:731–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Liong M, Lu J, Kovochich M, Xia T, Ruehm SG, Nel AE, Tamanoi F, Zink JI. Multifunctional inorganic nanoparticles for imaging, targeting, and drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2008;2:889–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Xu M, Wei M. Layered Double Hydroxide-Based Catalysts: Recent Advances in Preparation, Structure, and Applications. Adv Funct Mater 2018, 28.

  84. Wang Q, O’Hare D. Recent advances in the synthesis and application of layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanosheets. Chem Rev. 2012;112:4124–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. de Sousa A, Dos Santos WM, de Souza ML, Silva L, Yun A, Aguilera CSB, Chagas BF, Rolim LA, da Silva RMF, Neto PJR. Layered double hydroxides as Promising Excipients for Drug Delivery Purposes. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021;165:105922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Wen J, Yang K, Huang J, Sun S. Recent advances in LDH-based nanosystems for cancer therapy. Mater Design 2021, 198.

  87. Naguib M, Barsoum MW, Gogotsi Y. Ten years of Progress in the synthesis and development of MXenes. Adv Mater. 2021;33:e2103393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Li H, Fan R, Zou B, Yan J, Shi Q, Guo G. Roles of MXenes in biomedical applications: recent developments and prospects. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21:73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Iqbal A, Shahzad F, Hantanasirisakul K, Kim MK, Kwon J, Hong J, Kim H, Kim D, Gogotsi Y, Koo CM. Anomalous absorption of electromagnetic waves by 2D transition metal carbonitride Ti(3)CNT (x) (MXene). Science. 2020;369:446–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Shahzad F, Alhabeb M, Hatter CB, Anasori B, Man Hong S, Koo CM, Gogotsi Y. Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science. 2016;353:1137–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bao H, Qiu Y, Peng X, Wang JA, Mi Y, Zhao S, Liu X, Liu Y, Cao R, Zhuo L, et al. Isolated copper single sites for high-performance electroreduction of carbon monoxide to multicarbon products. Nat Commun. 2021;12:238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Xiao Z, Li Z, Li P, Meng X, Wang R. Ultrafine Ti(3)C(2) MXene Nanodots-Interspersed Nanosheet for High-Energy-Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Nano. 2019;13:3608–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Pei Y, Zhang X, Hui Z, Zhou J, Huang X, Sun G, Huang W. Ti(3)C(2)T(X) MXene for sensing applications: recent progress, Design Principles, and perspectives F. ACS Nano. 2021;15:3996–4017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Sun G, Yang S, Cai H, Shu Y, Han Q, Wang B, Li Z, Zhou L, Gao Q, Yin Z. Molybdenum disulfide nanoflowers mediated anti-inflammation macrophage modulation for spinal cord injury treatment. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;549:50–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Iravani S, Varma RS. MXenes for Cancer Therapy and diagnosis: recent advances and current Challenges. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7:1900–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bavykina A, Kolobov N, Khan IS, Bau JA, Ramirez A, Gascon J. Metal-Organic Frameworks in Heterogeneous Catalysis: recent progress, New Trends, and future perspectives. Chem Rev. 2020;120:8468–535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Arun Kumar S, Balasubramaniam B, Bhunia S, Jaiswal MK, Verma K, Prateek, Khademhosseini A, Gupta RK, Gaharwar AK. Two-dimensional metal organic frameworks for biomedical applications. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2021;13:e1674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. John AA, Subramanian AP, Vellayappan MV, Balaji A, Mohandas H, Jaganathan SK. Carbon nanotubes and graphene as emerging candidates in neuroregeneration and neurodrug delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:4267–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Lee Y-J, Jang W, Im H, Sung J-S. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance neuronal differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on graphene-based substrates. Curr Appl Phys. 2015;15:95–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Wang L, Liu X, Fu J, Ning X, Zhang M, Jiang Z, Cheng G, Zhu Y, Zhang Z. Release of methylene blue from graphene oxide-coated electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds to modulate functions of neural progenitor cells. Acta Biomater. 2019;88:346–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Gureev AP, Sadovnikova IS, Popov VN. Molecular Mechanisms of the neuroprotective effect of Methylene Blue. Biochem (Mosc). 2022;87:940–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Lu P, Wang G, Qian T, Cai X, Zhang P, Li M, Shen Y, Xue C, Wang H. The balanced microenvironment regulated by the degradants of appropriate PLGA scaffolds and chitosan conduit promotes peripheral nerve regeneration. Mater Today Bio. 2021;12:100158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Qi Z, Guo W, Zheng S, Fu C, Ma Y, Pan S, Liu Q, Yang X. Enhancement of neural stem cell survival, proliferation and differentiation by IGF-1 delivery in graphene oxide-incorporated PLGA electrospun nanofibrous mats. RSC Adv. 2019;9:8315–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Wang L, Song D, Zhang X, Ding Z, Kong X, Lu Q, Kaplan DL. Silk-Graphene hybrid hydrogels with multiple Cues to induce nerve cell behavior. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5:613–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Bisaglia M, Bubacco L. Copper ions and Parkinson’s Disease. Why Is Homeostasis So Relevant? Biomolecules; 2020. p. 10.

  106. Chen W, Ouyang J, Yi X, Xu Y, Niu C, Zhang W, Wang L, Sheng J, Deng L, Liu YN, Guo S. Black Phosphorus Nanosheets as a Neuroprotective Nanomedicine for Neurodegenerative Disorder Therapy. Adv Mater 2018, 30.

  107. Cai T, Liu H, Zhang S, Hu J, Zhang L. Delivery of nanovaccine towards lymphoid organs: recent strategies in enhancing cancer immunotherapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19:389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Li A, Wang S, Zhang Z, Xu N, Ling G, Zhang P. Poly-l-lysine derivative-coated black phosphorus as a nanoplatform for photothermal chemotherapy to enhance anti-tumor efficiency. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10:5191–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Jin L, Hu P, Wang Y, Wu L, Qin K, Cheng H, Wang S, Pan B, Xin H, Zhang W, Wang X. Fast-acting black-phosphorus-assisted Depression Therapy with low toxicity. Adv Mater. 2020;32:e1906050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Wang S, Qiu J, Guo W, Yu X, Nie J, Zhang J, Zhang X, Liu Z, Mou X, Li L, Liu H. A Nanostructured Molybdenum Disulfide Film for promoting neural stem cell neuronal differentiation: toward a nerve Tissue-Engineered 3D Scaffold. Adv Biosyst. 2017;1:e1600042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Wu Y, Zhu R, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Wang W, Sun X, Wu X, Cheng L, Zhang J, Wang S. Layered double hydroxide nanoparticles promote self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells through the PI3K signaling pathway. Nanoscale. 2015;7:11102–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. He X, Zhu Y, Yang L, Wang Z, Wang Z, Feng J, Wen X, Cheng L, Zhu R. MgFe-LDH nanoparticles: a promising leukemia inhibitory factor replacement for Self-Renewal and Pluripotency maintenance in cultured mouse embryonic stem cells. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8:2003535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Bichler O, Zhao W, Alibart F, Pleutin S, Lenfant S, Vuillaume D, Gamrat C. Pavlov’s dog associative learning demonstrated on synaptic-like organic transistors. Neural Comput. 2013;25:549–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Jiang J, Guo J, Wan X, Yang Y, Xie H, Niu D, Yang J, He J, Gao Y, Wan Q. 2D MoS(2) Neuromorphic Devices for Brain-Like Computational Systems. Small 2017, 13.

  115. Wang Z, Joshi S, Savel’ev SE, Jiang H, Midya R, Lin P, Hu M, Ge N, Strachan JP, Li Z, et al. Memristors with diffusive dynamics as synaptic emulators for neuromorphic computing. Nat Mater. 2017;16:101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Kim S, Yoon J, Kim HD, Choi SJ. Carbon Nanotube synaptic Transistor Network for Pattern Recognition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:25479–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. LeDoux JE, Pine DS. Using neuroscience to help understand fear and anxiety: a two-system Framework. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173:1083–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. La Barbera S, Alibart F. Synaptic Plasticity with Memristive Nanodevices. In Advances in Neuromorphic Hardware Exploiting Emerging Nanoscale Devices 2017: 17–43: Cognitive Systems Monographs].

  119. Sharbati MT, Du Y, Torres J, Ardolino ND, Yun M, Xiong F. Low-Power, Electrochemically Tunable Graphene Synapses for Neuromorphic Computing. Adv Mater 2018:e1802353.

  120. He HK, Yang R, Zhou W, Huang HM, Xiong J, Gan L, Zhai TY, Guo X. Photonic potentiation and electric habituation in ultrathin Memristive Synapses based on monolayer MoS(2). Small. 2018;14:e1800079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Wang CY, Liang SJ, Wang S, Wang P, Li Z, Wang Z, Gao A, Pan C, Liu C, Liu J, et al. Gate-tunable van der Waals heterostructure for reconfigurable neural network vision sensor. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba6173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Islam MM, Dev D, Krishnaprasad A, Tetard L, Roy T. Optoelectronic synapse using monolayer MoS(2) field effect transistors. Sci Rep. 2020;10:21870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Martinez-Martinez R, Islam MM, Krishnaprasad A, Roy T. Graphene-oxide interface for optoelectronic synapse application. Sci Rep. 2022;12:5880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Chen D, Wang F, Li Y, Wang W-W, Huang T-X, Li J-F, Novoselov KS, Tian Z-Q, Zhan D. Programmed electrochemical exfoliation of graphite to high quality graphene. Chem Commun. 2019;55:3379–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Ejigu A, Le Fevre LW, Fujisawa K, Terrones M, Forsyth AJ, Dryfe RAW. Electrochemically exfoliated Graphene Electrode for High-Performance Rechargeable Chloroaluminate and Dual-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:23261–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Zhang L, Gong T, Wang H, Guo Z, Zhang H. Memristive devices based on emerging two-dimensional materials beyond graphene. Nanoscale. 2019;11:12413–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Bertolazzi S, Bondavalli P, Roche S, San T, Choi SY, Colombo L, Bonaccorso F, Samori P. Nonvolatile Memories based on Graphene and related 2D materials. Adv Mater. 2019;31:e1806663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Yuan S, Qiu B, Amina K, Li L, Zhai P, Su Y, Xue T, Jiang T, Ding L, Wei G. Robust and low-power-consumption Black Phosphorus-Graphene Artificial synaptic Devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:21242–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Ahmed T, Kuriakose S, Mayes ELH, Ramanathan R, Bansal V, Bhaskaran M, Sriram S, Walia S. Optically stimulated Artificial Synapse based on layered black phosphorus. Small. 2019;15:e1900966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Feng X, Huang X, Chen L, Tan WC, Wang L, Ang K-W. High Mobility Anisotropic Black Phosphorus Nanoribbon Field-Effect Transistor. Adv Funct Mater 2018, 28.

  131. Xu X, Zhang C, Hota MK, Liu Z, Zhang X, Alshareef HN. Enhanced Quality of Wafer-Scale MoS2 Films by a Capping Layer Annealing Process. Adv Funct Mater, 30:1908040.

  132. Park W, Pak Y, Jang HY, Nam JH, Kim TH, Oh S, Choi SM, Kim Y, Cho B. Improvement of the Bias Stress Stability in 2D MoS(2) and WS(2) Transistors with a TiO(2) Interfacial Layer. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2019, 9.

  133. Krishnaprasad A, Dev D, Han SS, Shen Y, Chung HS, Bae TS, Yoo C, Jung Y, Lanza M, Roy T. MoS(2) Synapses with Ultra-low Variability and their implementation in Boolean Logic. ACS Nano. 2022;16:2866–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Dugger BN, Dickson DW. Pathology of Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2017, 9.

  135. Checkoway H, Lundin JI, Kelada SN. Neurodegenerative diseases. IARC Sci Publ 2011:407–19.

  136. Erkkinen MG, Kim MO, Geschwind MD. Clinical Neurology and Epidemiology of the Major Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2018, 10.

  137. Ren C, Li D, Zhou Q, Hu X. Mitochondria-targeted TPP-MoS(2) with dual enzyme activity provides efficient neuroprotection through M1/M2 microglial polarization in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Biomaterials. 2020;232:119752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Yang J, Liu W, Sun Y, Dong X. LVFFARK-PEG-Stabilized black phosphorus nanosheets potently inhibit Amyloid-β fibrillogenesis. Langmuir. 2020;36:1804–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Wang K, Wang L, Chen L, Peng C, Luo B, Mo J, Chen W. Intranasal administration of dauricine loaded on graphene oxide: multi-target therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Deliv. 2021;28:580–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Aziz A, Asif M, Azeem M, Ashraf G, Wang Z, Xiao F, Liu H. Self-stacking of exfoliated charged nanosheets of LDHs and graphene as biosensor with real-time tracking of dopamine from live cells. Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1047:197–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Zhu Z, Gong L, Miao X, Chen C, Su S. Prussian Blue Nanoparticle Supported MoS(2) Nanocomposites as a Peroxidase-Like Nanozyme for Colorimetric Sensing of Dopamine. Biosens (Basel) 2022, 12.

  142. Xiong S, Li Z, Liu Y, Wang Q, Luo J, Chen X, Xie Z, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Chen T. Brain-targeted delivery shuttled by black phosphorus nanostructure to treat Parkinson’s disease. Biomaterials. 2020;260:120339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Wong Y, Markham K, Xu ZP, Chen M, Max Lu GQ, Bartlett PF, Cooper HM. Efficient delivery of siRNA to cortical neurons using layered double hydroxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2010;31:8770–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Jin P, Wei P, Zhang Y, Lin J, Sha R, Hu Y, Zhang J, Zhou W, Yao H, Ren L, et al. Autophagy-mediated clearance of ubiquitinated mutant huntingtin by graphene oxide. Nanoscale. 2016;8:18740–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Joo J, Kwon EJ, Kang J, Skalak M, Anglin EJ, Mann AP, Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN, Sailor MJ. Porous silicon-graphene oxide core-shell nanoparticles for targeted delivery of siRNA to the injured brain. Nanoscale Horiz. 2016;1:407–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Pradhan K, Das G, Khan J, Gupta V, Barman S, Adak A, Ghosh S. Neuro-regenerative choline-functionalized Injectable Graphene Oxide Hydrogel Repairs Focal Brain Injury. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2018;10:1535–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Pan S, Qi Z, Li Q, Ma Y, Fu C, Zheng S, Kong W, Liu Q, Yang X. Graphene oxide-PLGA hybrid nanofibres for the local delivery of IGF-1 and BDNF in spinal cord repair. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47:651–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Dominguez-Bajo A, Gonzalez-Mayorga A, Lopez-Dolado E, Munuera C, Garcia-Hernandez M, Serrano MC. Graphene Oxide Microfibers promote regenerative responses after chronic implantation in the cervical injured spinal cord. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6:2401–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Zhang L, Hou S, Movahedi F, Li Z, Li L, Hu J, Jia Y, Huang Y, Zhu J, Sun X et al. Amyloid-β/Tau burden and neuroinflammation dual-targeted nanomedicines synergistically restore memory and recognition of Alzheimer’s disease mice. Nano Today 2023, 49.

  150. Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, Chételat G, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, Nixon RA, Jones DT. Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Khan S, Barve KH, Kumar MS. Recent advancements in Pathogenesis, Diagnostics and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18:1106–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Zhang L, Sun H, Chen Y, Wei M, Lee J, Li F, Ling D. Functional nanoassemblies for the diagnosis and therapy of Alzheimer’s diseases. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2021;13:e1696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Beitz JM. Parkinson’s disease: a review. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2014;6:65–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Samii A, Nutt JG, Ransom BR. Parkinson’s disease. The Lancet. 2004;363:1783–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Taylor JP, Hardy J, Fischbeck KH. Toxic proteins in neurodegenerative disease. Science. 2002;296:1991–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Medina DX, Chung EP, Teague CD, Bowser R, Sirianni RW. Intravenously administered, Retinoid activating nanoparticles increase lifespan and reduce neurodegeneration in the SOD1(G93A) mouse model of ALS. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  157. Chen L, Watson C, Morsch M, Cole NJ, Chung RS, Saunders DN, Yerbury JJ, Vine KL. Improving the delivery of SOD1 antisense oligonucleotides to motor neurons using calcium phosphate-lipid nanoparticles. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  158. Rogers ML, Smith KS, Matusica D, Fenech M, Hoffman L, Rush RA, Voelcker NH. Non-viral gene therapy that targets motor neurons in vivo. Front Mol Neurosci. 2014;7:80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Forloni G, Roiter I, Tagliavini F. Clinical trials of prion disease therapeutics. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2019;44:53–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. Sarnataro D. Attempt to Untangle the Prion-Like Misfolding Mechanism for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2018, 19.

  161. Binyamin O, Keller G, Frid K, Larush L, Magdassi S, Gabizon R. Continues administration of Nano-PSO significantly increased survival of genetic CJD mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;108:140–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Valbuena Valecillos AD, Gater DR Jr, Alvarez G. Concomitant Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Management Strategies: A Narrative Review. J Pers Med 2022, 12.

  163. Capizzi A, Woo J, Verduzco-Gutierrez M. Traumatic Brain Injury: an overview of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Medical Management. Med Clin North Am. 2020;104:213–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 2002;359:417–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Dybowska-Sarapuk Ł, Sosnowicz W, Grzeczkowicz A, Krzemiński J, Jakubowska M. Ultrasonication effects on graphene composites in neural cell cultures. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:992494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Mamelak AN, Jacoby DB. Targeted delivery of antitumoral therapy to glioma and other malignancies with synthetic chlorotoxin (TM-601). Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007;4:175–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Tan AC, Ashley DM, Lopez GY, Malinzak M, Friedman HS, Khasraw M. Management of glioblastoma: state of the art and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:299–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Cheng L, Wang X, Gong F, Liu T, Liu Z. 2D nanomaterials for Cancer Theranostic Applications. Adv Mater. 2020;32:e1902333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Wang LV, Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science. 2012;335:1458–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. Liu C, Chen J, Zhu Y, Gong X, Zheng R, Chen N, Chen D, Yan H, Zhang P, Zheng H, et al. Highly sensitive MoS(2)-Indocyanine Green Hybrid for Photoacoustic Imaging of Orthotopic Brain Glioma at Deep Site. Nanomicro Lett. 2018;10:48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  172. Zhang L, Sun H, Zhao J, Lee J, Ee Low L, Gong L, Chen Y, Wang N, Zhu C, Lin P, et al. Dynamic nanoassemblies for imaging and therapy of neurological disorders. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;175:113832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  173. Chen J, Liu C, Hu D, Wang F, Wu H, Gong X, Liu X, Song L, Sheng Z, Zheng H. Single-layer MoS2Nanosheets with amplified Photoacoustic Effect for highly sensitive photoacoustic imaging of Orthotopic Brain Tumors. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:8715–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Palmieri V, Perini G, De Spirito M, Papi M. Graphene oxide touches blood: in vivo interactions of bio-coronated 2D materials. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019;4:273–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Yildiz G, Bolton-Warberg M, Awaja F. Graphene and graphene oxide for bio-sensing: General properties and the effects of graphene ripples. Acta Biomater. 2021;131:62–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Shen H, Liu M, He H, Zhang L, Huang J, Chong Y, Dai J, Zhang Z. PEGylated graphene oxide-mediated protein delivery for cell function regulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4:6317–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Katsila T, Siskos AP, Tamvakopoulos C. Peptide and protein drugs: the study of their metabolism and catabolism by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2012;31:110–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Liu G, Shen H, Mao J, Zhang L, Jiang Z, Sun T, Lan Q, Zhang Z. Transferrin modified graphene oxide for glioma-targeted drug delivery: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5:6909–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Li X, Lovell JF, Yoon J, Chen X. Clinical development and potential of photothermal and photodynamic therapies for cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:657–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Peng F, Zhao F, Shan L, Li R, Jiang S, Zhang P. Black phosphorus nanosheets-based platform for targeted chemo-photothermal synergistic cancer therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;198:111467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. Sun Z, Xie H, Tang S, Yu XF, Guo Z, Shao J, Zhang H, Huang H, Wang H, Chu PK. Ultrasmall Black Phosphorus Quantum Dots: synthesis and use as Photothermal Agents. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:11526–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Yang X, Wang D, Shi Y, Zou J, Zhao Q, Zhang Q, Huang W, Shao J, Xie X, Dong X. Black phosphorus nanosheets immobilizing Ce6 for imaging-guided Photothermal/Photodynamic Cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:12431–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Liu S, Pan X, Liu H. Two-dimensional nanomaterials for Photothermal Therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59:5890–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Choi G, Choy JH. Recent progress in layered double hydroxides as a cancer theranostic nanoplatform. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2021;13:e1679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Mallakpour S, Hatami M, Hussain CM. Recent innovations in functionalized layered double hydroxides: fabrication, characterization, and industrial applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;283:102216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Walker BC, Mittal S. Antitumor Activity of Curcumin in Glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci 2020, 21.

  187. Zhang H, Zhu Y, Sun X, He X, Wang M, Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhu R, Wang S. Curcumin-loaded layered double Hydroxide Nanoparticles-Induced Autophagy for reducing Glioma Cell Migration and Invasion. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2016;12:2051–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. Miao Z, Hu D, Gao D, Fan L, Ma Y, Ma T, Liu X, Zheng H, Zha Z, Sheng Z, Xu C-Y. Tiny 2D silicon quantum sheets: a brain photonic nanoagent for orthotopic glioma theranostics. Sci Bull. 2021;66:147–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. Wang Y, Chen X, Shen D, Zhang M, Chen X, Chen X, Shao W, Gu H, Xu J, Hu E et al. Artificial Neurons Based on Ag/V(2)C/W Threshold Switching Memristors. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2021, 11.

  190. Chen Y, Li D, Ren H, Tang Y, Liang K, Wang Y, Li F, Song C, Guan J, Chen Z, et al. Highly Linear and symmetric synaptic Memtransistors based on polarization switching in Two-Dimensional Ferroelectric Semiconductors. Small. 2022;18:e2203611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Khot AC, Dongale TD, Nirmal KA, Sung JH, Lee HJ, Nikam RD, Kim TG. Amorphous Boron Nitride Memristive device for high-density memory and Neuromorphic Computing Applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:10546–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. Ding L, Liang M, Li C, Ji X, Zhang J, Xie W, Reis RL, Li FR, Gu S, Wang Y. Design strategies of Tumor-Targeted Delivery Systems based on 2D nanomaterials. Small Methods. 2022;6:e2200853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  193. Wang L, Xiong Q, Xiao F, Duan H. 2D nanomaterials based electrochemical biosensors for cancer diagnosis. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;89:136–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank BioRender program that all figures in this manuscript were created with BioRender.com.

Funding

This study was supported in part by Zhejiang Science and Technology Program (2022C03034), China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talent (BX20190295), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M681891).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K. L. wrote the Sect. 5 and prepared Fig. 4 of the main manuscript, and also finalized the whole paper. Q. J. wrote the Sect. 2 and prepared Fig. 1. H. L. and Z. H. wrote the Sect. 4 and prepared Fig. 3 of the main manuscript. X. H. wrote the Sect. 3 and prepared Fig. 2 of the main manuscript. L. Z. performed a final editing of this manuscript. H. H. conceptualized and supervised the writing, editing, and proofreading of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Linghui Zeng or Haijun Han.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests:

There are no financial interests or potential conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K., Ji, Q., Liang, H. et al. Biomedical application of 2D nanomaterials in neuroscience. J Nanobiotechnol 21, 181 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-01920-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-01920-4

Keywords