Skip to main content
Download PDF

Functional roles of magnetic nanoparticles for the identification of metastatic lymph nodes in cancer patients

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 21, Article number: 337 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Staging lymph nodes (LN) is crucial in diagnosing and treating cancer metastasis. Biotechnologies for the specific localization of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) have attracted significant attention to efficiently define tumor metastases. Bioimaging modalities, particularly magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) such as iron oxide nanoparticles, have emerged as promising tools in cancer bioimaging, with great potential for use in the preoperative and intraoperative tracking of MLNs. As radiation-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) probes, MNPs can serve as alternative MRI contrast agents, offering improved accuracy and biological safety for nodal staging in cancer patients. Although MNPs’ application is still in its initial stages, exploring their underlying mechanisms can enhance the sensitivity and multifunctionality of lymph node mapping. This review focuses on the feasibility and current application status of MNPs for imaging metastatic nodules in preclinical and clinical development. Furthermore, exploring novel and promising MNP-based strategies with controllable characteristics could lead to a more precise treatment of metastatic cancer patients.

Introduction

Cancer cells could escape the primary site through complex biological mechanisms and localize to other body parts, forming metastatic tumors [1]. Carcinoma metastasis is responsible for cancer development, prognosis, and therapeutic response [2,3,4]. Furthermore, metastasis represents one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality [5, 6]. Therefore, exploring the underlying biochemical events involved in regulating the metastatic process would be essential and meaningful to identify potential targets for the inhibition and prevention of metastasis. In particular, the definition of metastatic events in the early stages can influence the clinical management of cancer patients.

It is well known that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important dissemination event during metastasis. Among these, the sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), the closest lymph nodes (LN) that drain the tumor area, can serve as a host of metastatic cancer cells [7]. SLN mapping has recently been used to detect early lymphatic metastases in cancer patients [8]. Traditionally, the main assessment methods for LNM are several radiomic-based technologies, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). However, these detection approaches have some significant disadvantages and limitations. MRI cannot accurately distinguish fibrosis and tumor infiltration, ultimately triggering false positive results for cancer diagnosis and stage [9]. CT scans may lead to the potential harm of exposure to ionizing radiation and the risk of overdiagnosis in patients with an incidental finding [10]. The challenges for the use of PET/CT have been raised about not only the costs and time consumption but also the misinterpretation in some noncancerous tissues with high radiotracer uptake [11].

It should be noted that although clinical imaging can efficiently determine tumor metastasis, these imaging-based techniques are challenging to detect micro-metastases, which occur early in the progression of malignancies [12]. When the findings of the imaging modalities reveal the presence of suspicious metastatic nodules, pathological tests are necessary to clarify their origin and location. An SLN biopsy should be performed for patients without nodules to confirm whether cancer cells have spread to the nearby LNs (also called regional lymph nodes, RLNs) or other organs [13]. However, pathological examination is unavoidably associated with surgical procedures that could carry the risk of harm to patients. Specifically, even after a sentinel node biopsy, some patients have been reported to have lymphedema, a pathological condition characterized by a localized accumulation of excessive interstitial fluids [14, 15]. Therefore, exploring novel noninvasive and effective strategies to better detect LNM risk in cancer patients is always of great concern.

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have been utilized to visualize the lymphatic spread of cancer cells, which is of great significance for cancer staging and treatment. The use of MNPs for human disease diagnosis was first introduced in the 1990s, serving as an agent for liver imaging, and revealed good biological safety [16, 17]. After that, since MNPs can be detected and manipulated by remote magnetic fields, their clinical application for LNM will substantially impact cancer bioimaging and early diagnosis [18, 19]. To date, iron oxide nanoparticle (IONP)-based formulations, one of the most advanced MNPs, have been used mainly as MRI contrast agents (CAs) for LN mapping [20, 21]. FDA-approved ferumoxytol, a carboxymethyl dextran-based IONP, helps detect locoregional LN in prostate cancer patients [22]. With the help of 1.5 Tesla MRI scanners, intravenous injection of ferrimagnetic or ferromagnetic IONP-labeled macrophages can specifically target LN and its metastases in a nude mouse model (BALB/c) [23, 24]. Zhou et al. constructed a dye-conjugated near-infrared (NIR) IONP, IONP-NIR830, and found that IONP-NIR830 administration could display strong T2*-weighted magnetic resonance and NIR images for preoperative and intraoperative tracking of SLN [25]. Although the application of MNPs is still in its early stages, exploring the underlying mechanisms of MNPs has excellent potential for improving the sensitivity and multifunctionality of LNM mapping. In particular, developing novel MNP-based probes for the precise assessment of LN status will significantly influence the decision-making on operative approaches and therapeutic strategies in cancer patients.

Here, we provide an updated and comprehensive review of MNPs, especially IONPs, in molecular imaging of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) in preclinical (Table 1) and clinical (Table 2) development. Furthermore, detailed biological characteristics and application status of different MNPs were discussed, highlighting their essential contribution to diagnosing LNM.

Table 1 The pre-clinical evaluation of main magnetic nanoparticles in the molecular imaging of metastatic lymph nodes
Full size table
Table 2 The clinical trials of main magnetic nanoparticles in the molecular imaging of metastatic lymph nodes
Full size table

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

The first IONPs, which have a size of 40–150 nm, are termed standard superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) [26]. The superparamagnetic phenomenon was first described in the 1950s by Néel [27], who observed the magnetic properties of small ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic particles at the nanoscale in the external magnetic field. Typically, SPION has a core of iron oxide (Fe3O4 or Fe2O3) coated with optional aggregation preventing monomer or polymer to enhance stability. These coated materials can also be functionalized with targeting molecules or ligands to target the corresponding cells or tissues [28]. Vu-Quang et al. investigated the characteristics of mannan-coated SPIONs, which could be targeted to deliver immune cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis. They discovered that normal macrophages and dendritic cells could preferentially phagocytose mannan-SPION very early after intravenous injection [29].

In subsequent studies, the unique properties, such as magnetic responsiveness and high relaxivity, make SPIONs useful for their function as attractive MRI CAs in biomedical applications [30]. SPION-based MRI offers promising programs for early MLN detection while avoiding the shortcomings of radioactive labels in conventional imaging techniques [31,32,33]. The combination of SPION-MRI and handheld magnetometers provides a non-radioactive strategy for the preoperative [34] and intraoperative [35] locations of SLN. Preoperative injection of SPIONs in breast cancer improves detection rate and nodal yields [36]. The reliability of SLN detection by SPION-MRI incorporated with the SentiMag magnetometer has also been verified by Minamiya et al. in non-small cell lung cancer [37]. As shown in Fig. 1, the underlying mechanism is that IONPs could only be phagocytosed by reticuloendothelial cells in normal lymphoid tissues, resulting in the darkening of normal LNs in T2* weighted images. Inversely, due to the lack of reticuloendothelial cells, the tumor tissues or LNs invaded by tumor cells absorb the nanoparticles that show a high signal in the lymphoid tissues on MRI [38, 39]. Consequently, a recent study by Johnson et al. [40] confirmed that SPIONs are mainly distributed around metastatic nodules after subcutaneous injection, but are not seen within areas containing metastases. The systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing approximately 20 existing studies demonstrated that the dose, injection site, and nodal metastasis burden had no significant effect on the detection rate of LNM by SPION-based CAs. Despite this, injection of SPIONs 24 h before surgery could improve the detection rate [36].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The application of MNPs-based strategies for MRI imaging of tumor lymphatic metastasis. The successful development of MNPs-based strategies in bioimaging recently made it possible to utilize MNPs as the MRI probes for MLNs tracking in cancer patients. After injection, MNPs could be preferentially phagocytosed by cells in normal lymphoid tissues, resulting in the darkening signal on T2*-weighted images. Inversely, high signal intensity on T2*-weighted images is observed for the metastatic LNs which do not take up the nanoparticles

Full size image

To approve the potential use of SPIONs for magnetic resonance lymphoscintigraphy, Winter et al. [41] reported a study on the clinical validation of SPIONs for SLN identification in penile cancers. In this case, inguinal SLN could be reliably visualized by MRI after peritumoral injection of SPIONs. For patients with submucosal esophageal cancer, endoscopic injection of SPIONs into the peritumor tissues is a proper method to estimate whether to perform a three-field lymphadenectomy with neck LN dissection [42]. More importantly, these patients did not present significant side effects attributable to SPION injection. Based on the statements of Motomura et al. [43], SPION-enhanced MRI imaging showed usefulness in confirming metastatic sentinel nodes located by CT scanning. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of SPION-guided imaging for detecting metastases in SLNs were 89.2%, 84.0%, and 90.9%, respectively. Subsequently, this group evaluated the correlation between SPION-enhanced MRI lymphography and pathologic size to detect metastatic SLNs [44]. They showed that for metastatic nodes with pathologic > 2 mm, the high signal intensity indicated by SPION-MRI imaging showed a good correlation with their pathological size. Given the feasible and safe properties, SPION-based magnetic procedures could propose entirely radiation-free methods for the preoperative and intraoperative location of SLNs in cancer patients [45]. Therefore, SPION-guided MRI methods are helpful for the visualization of LN mapping, guiding clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions.

It is worth mentioning here that the combination use of SPIONs and specifically targeted SPION conjugates (e.g., cell surface molecule-targeted tags) is available to depict macro- and early micrometastases within the lymphatic system. High levels of tenascin-C could be observed in cervical cancer tissues with node metastasis but not in non-metastatic patients and normal cervix tissues [46]. Synthesized SPION-anti-tenascin-C, a magnetic probe oriented specifically to tenascin-C, possessed the non-invasive ability to capture specific MLNs with high expression of tenascin-C in preoperative cervical cancer patients [47]. Wang et al. developed a novel SPIOs@A-T imaging probe to target breast cancer and ATP responsiveness to the tumor microenvironment. Mice injected with SPIOs@A-T presented high-intensity fluorescence molecular imaging and magnetic particle imaging with high sensitivity and specificity in the MLN group [48]. Recently, Sienna+, a dark brown aqueous suspension of SPIONs, has been utilized in conjunction with the handheld magnetometer SentiMag to non-radioactively locate SLNs. This magnetic nanoparticle tracer, Sienna+/SentiMag, could quantitatively and accurately confirm nodal staging, providing a feasible and safe alternative to SLN mapping in colorectal cancer patients [13]. The result of the consistency examination showed good concordance between the Sienna+/SentiMag probe and the standard radioisotope-guided dynamic SLN mapping [49]. In addition, the Sienna+/SentiMag technique enhances clinical outcomes and experience for cancer patients by reducing patient contact time, avoiding radiation exposure, and operating cost-effectively [50, 51].

These emerging imaging modalities have extended the applications of SPIONs in molecular oncological diagnostics. However, the questions regarding the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of SPIONs and conjugates must be well addressed before the approval of these nanoparticles for clinical application in cancer patients.

Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide

The smaller SPIONs (median diameter less than 50 nm) are called ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides (USPIOs). The smaller particle size of USPIOs leads to their specific lymphotropic behavior [52]. After administration, USPIO particles could be phagocytosed by nodal macrophages and then directly drained to normal nodes. After localization to LNs, USPIOs generate a susceptibility artifact on gradient echo MRI sequences, resulting in loss of T2*-related signal [53, 54]. In contrast, high signal intensity is observed on T2*-weighted images in metastatic LNs lacking macrophages [55]. According to this guideline for USPIO-enhanced MRI, LN without blackening or hyperintense in surrounding tissues could be diagnosed as metastatic nodules. The LNs were considered non-metastatic if they displayed low signal intensity [56]. Consequently, a recent study by Shen et al. [57] evaluated the changes in the T2*-weighted image after USPIO enhancement. The results did not show a reduced signal intensity for metastatic nodules.

The preferential application of USPIO as MRI CAs in cancer patients will help improve the ability of MRI to detect LN and their metastases early and contribute to better preoperative staging. Compared to pathological morphological findings, using MRI + USPIO results in greater diagnostic specificity to identify LN status [53]. USPIO-based MRI could also provide clues for the surgical removal of suspicious LNs not included during dissection [58]. The maximum lymphographic effect could be observed after 24 h of USPIO administration [59, 60]. In general, the application of USPIO-enhanced MRI improves the detection rates of LNM, particularly for nodules smaller than 5 mm [61]. Similar studies revealed that, in patients with bladder or prostate cancer, USPIO-enhanced MRI allows for definite metastases in normal-shaped or smaller LNs [62,63,64]. For LN staging in patients with oesophageal cancer, administration with USPIO-enhanced MRI could accurately identify distant and regional nodules, such as celiac and mediastinal LN [65].

Furthermore, compared to routine breath-hold MRI, the MRI + USPIO method is more feasible and superior for LNM visualization in esophageal cancer patients [66]. A recent in vivo experiment suggested no negative adverse effects in dog oral cancer models treated with USPIO lymphotropic nanoparticles [67]. Despite their ability to diagnose LNM, USPIOs have not yet been approved for clinical application [68].

Several USPIO-based technologies, such as ferumoxtran-10, are being evaluated clinically and preclinically [26, 69]. Ferumoxtran-10, composed of USPIO, is a promising lymphotropic CA that could diagnose more positive metastatic LNs than traditional imaging techniques, such as PET/CT [70, 71]. Using ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRI, Tatsumi et al. reported high accuracy in detecting LNM in 194 nodes from 17 gastric cancer patients, with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.6%, positive predictive value of 85.5%, negative predictive value of 100%, and overall predictive accuracy of 94.8% [72]. Tokuhara et al. demonstrated that the positive predictive value and accuracy for nodal staging using ferumoxtran-10 enhanced MRI in 519 nodes of 31 gastric cancer patients were 90.1% and 97.1%, respectively, significantly higher than conventional criteria, which have a positive predictive value and accuracy of 76.8% and 93.3% [73]. In addition to some tolerable side effects, such as allergic skin changes or back pain, no other side effects were observed in patients receiving ferumoxtran-10 [74, 75]. However, current reports are insufficient to support the functional roles of ferumoxtran-10 in all tumor types.

Instead, several novel USPIO-contained CAs, such as P904 [76] and PJY10 [77], and CS015 [78], have been well-developed to show better performance than ferumoxtran-10 in LNM MR lymphography in oncological fields. CS015, a polyacrylic acid (PAA) coated USPIO, enhances the long-term stability of USPIO in various solutions [79]. After subcutaneous and intravenous injections, the CS015 particles could be effectively swallowed by macrophages residing in LN, even at a very low working concentration [78]. Birkhäuser et al. evaluated the recognizable effects of USPIO-MRI combined with diffusion-weighted MRI (USPIO-DW-MRI) for metastatic LNs in patients with bladder and prostate cancer. The combined USPIO-DW-MRI demonstrated the ability to rapidly detect small metastatic LN preoperatively [80]. The median read time of USPIO-DW-MRI in each patient was about 13 min, significantly shorter than that of the traditional method [81]. Another strategy has been reported by the Liu group [82], where USPIO-PEG-sLeX molecular probes were constructed based on the conjugation between poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) coated USPIO and Sialyl Lewis X (sLeX), the high-affinity ligand for the selectin family. The following in vivo models showed that USPIO-PEG-sLeX successfully targeted E-selectin associated with cancer metastasis and enabled early detection of metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. These findings would help provide promising platforms for the design of novel USPIO-based nanoparticles for LN mapping. For further clarification, studies should be conducted to determine nanoparticle imaging properties, diagnostic roles, and therapeutic values in human cancers.

Other emerging magnetic nanoparticles

Newly designed MNPs with unique physicochemical and pharmacodynamic characteristics have been synthesized and demonstrated excellent diagnostic potential for lymph node mapping (Fig. 2; Table 3). For example, IONPs coated with folic acid (FA-IONPs) have been designed for LN imaging. Intracellular distribution analysis revealed the specific uptake of FA-IONPs by metastatic LNs that express the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). This folate transporter leads to the targeted detection of LNM by MRI in prostate cancer [83]. The combination of MagTrace and MagSeed, two non-radioactive magnetic techniques, showed the effectiveness and safety of the location of SLN in patients with breast cancer [84]. Recently, a clinical trial [NCT05569707, https://clinicaltrials.gov/] has been registered to evaluate the clinical application of handheld magnetic probes, Magtrace, in combination with SentiMag and differential magnetometry, in patients with melanoma. As alternative MRI agents, these emerging nanoparticles could be attractive for accurately identifying metastatic LN, providing a surgical roadmap for resectioning suspicious nodules [85]. Indeed, the visualization of LNs marked with nanoparticles would provide the foundation for future research to evaluate the underlying effects of MNPs for cancer research and treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic illustrations indicating the different types of MNPs in LN mapping. These MNPs with different physicochemical and pharmacodynamic characteristics have been successfully synthesized, and displayed the excellent diagnostic potential for identification of metastatic LNs in cancer patients

Full size image
Table 3 Other emerging magnetic nanoparticles for imaging of metastatic lymph nodes
Full size table

Due to the complement of different imaging modalities, nano agents with multimodal imaging capability exhibit high sensitivity and resolution for nodal staging (Fig. 3). The use of dual-modal nanoparticles for fluorescent imaging and MRI of metastatic LNs is gradually attracting attention. Podoplanin and the lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor 1 (LYVE-1) are explicitly expressed in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs), serving as particular lymphoid biomarkers [86]. Wu et al. have integrated podoplanin/LYVE-1 antibodies on the surface of Fe3O4-α-ketoglutarate chitosan nanocarriers to form the Fe3O4@KCTS-LEC double antibody nanoprobe [87]. Biochemical and functional assays suggested that these double antibody probes could select fluorescence/magnetic resonance dual imaging for LECs, allowing a precise diagnosis of lymphatic metastases. After tail vein injection, hematoxylin-eosin staining did not show prominent necrotic or inflammatory characteristics in the primary tissues of the mouse xenograft model of colon cancer, demonstrating its high biosafety. Fu et al. [88] prepared manganese porphyrin/indocyanine green (ICG) nanoparticles, F127-ICG/Mn, which efficiently integrated the F127-stabilized ICG and tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin-Mn(III) (TCPP(Mn)). With the help of F127-ICG/Mn, the visualization of green-stained SLNs was evident, which could be seen with the naked eye. More importantly, micro- and macro-SLN metastasis could be successfully distinguished by fluorescence molecular imaging and magnetic particle imaging. During laparoscopic surgery, these dual-tracer SPION-ICG consisting of MNPs and ICG are more sensitive to detecting SLNs than MNPs or ICG alone [89]. Similarly, the dual-tracer strategy, ICG, and magnetic FerroTrace mixture could be used to identify reliable SLNs specifically and sensitively [90]. Furthermore, the clinical trial [NCT05092750] on FerroTrace’s SLN mapping has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), although no patients have been recruited. Kuwahata’s group [91] adopted a different approach to studying LN status. The combination of alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) provides dual-tracer electromagnetic fields [92], thereby leading to more accurate imaging of SLNs. Consequently, Kuwahata et al. [91] developed a laparoscopic magnetic probe, an AC-DC probe. Gastric SLNs labeled with the AC-DC probe were detected within AC and DC magnetization. In laparoscopic surgery, SLN detection rates were not affected by the shine-through effect at the injection site.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The magnetic nanoagents with multifunctional capability exhibit high sensitivity for nodal staging and cancer treatment. With the rapid development of technologies, several multimodal MNPs-based contrast imaging agents have been developed for the LNs detection and cancer theranostics

Full size image

In addition, Gadolinium (Gd)-based CAs (Gd-CAs) appear as one of the most advanced developments in the image-guided mapping of LNM during cancers. IONP conjugated with gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) was helpful in optimally estimating the metastatic potential of tumor-draining LN cells in the B16-F10 footpad melanoma model [93]. Administration of Gd-DTPA decreases the threshold size for nodule detection [94], indicating high sensitivity. Meanwhile, subcutaneous injection of generation-6 Gd dendrimer-based CAs (Gd-G6) could effectively characterize micro and macrometastasis within the lymphatic system [95]. After labeling with NIR Cy5.5fluorophore, Gd-G6 provided real-time intraoperative guidance for surgical SLN resection under MR and NIR imaging conditions [96]. Another two signal-enhanced and high-resolution Gd-based MRI agents, Gd2O3@PCD [97] and Gd3+·DOTA⊂SNPs [98] were successfully developed for the biological application of in vivo imaging. These injections of these two agents exhibited a crucial capacity for staging and diagnosing LNs and metastatic spread in tumor mice. With the rapid development of technologies, researchers have developed several multimodal Gd-based contrast imaging agents for detecting micro-metastatic LNs, such as GdIOP@ZDS nanoparticles [99]. Yang et al. [100] synthesized the Gd-loaded, polyethyleneimine-entrapped gold nano agents (Gd-Au PENPs) with attractive dual-modal CT/magnetic resonance lymphography properties. Functioning as an indirect CT/MRI CA, the Gd-Au PENPs possessed the ability to locate lingual SLN in rabbit VX2 tongue cancer models. Dong et al. [101] established a naked eye and NIR fluorescent nanoprobe inkMNP-PEG-H2 by connecting cuttlefish melanin with NIR fluorescent dye H2. When combined with Gd ions, inkMNP-PEG-H2 showed a high signal-to-noise ratio, accumulation, and sensitivity in lymphatic imaging. The embedding of the NIR dye ZW800 in nanoencapsulation labeled with Gd3+ and radionuclide 64Cu made it possible to facilitate optical, MRI, and PET NIR imaging simultaneously [102]. These triple-modal MSN probes have several excellent features, such as long intracellular retention time and high stability, contributing to long-term multimodal imaging for metastatic SLNs.

Magnetic nanoparticle-guided imaging and therapeutic effects

Other projects were developed simultaneously for metastatic node imaging and cancer treatment (Fig. 3; Table 4). MNP-based molecular imaging probes provide excellent opportunities for early metastatic diagnosis and cancer treatment [103]. Gold-shelled magnetic IONPs were coated with PEG to obtain stable and superior IONC@Au-PEG in physiological solutions [104]. In the 4T1 tumor metastatic model, the IONC@Au-PEG nanocomposites could be transferred to SLNs via lymphatic pathways for imaging of cancer metastasis. Given that Au granules have an absorption peak in the NIR range, IONC@Au-PEG also functioned as a potential photothermal reagent possessing pronounced cytotoxic effects against primary tumors and SLNs. Through integrating magnetic Fe3O4, radioactive 99mTc, and the NIR dye IR-1061, a research group from Soochow University successfully fabricated a new-style nanotheranostic agent, FIP-99mTc [105]. The FIP-99mTc nano agent, including MRI, PET/CT, and NIR fluorescence imaging, displayed excellent multimodal capability for LN mapping in breast cancer. Surprisingly, after laser irradiation, treatment with FIP-99mTc could rapidly raise the temperature to exceed the threshold, facilitating the ablation of tumor cells within metastatic nodules. Multifunctional polymer microbubbles (MPMBs) could be artificially synthesized by encapsulating Fe3O4 loaded with chemotherapeutic doxorubicin in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microbubbles [106]. Lymphographic MPMBs can quickly enter the lymphatic system and trigger the targeted delivery and controlled release of doxorubicin, which produces therapeutic effects on metastatic LNs. To facilitate the targeted delivery of nanoparticles to cancer cells, Shi’s group [107] reported a matrix metalloprotease-2 (MMP2) activatable Gd-doping-CuS micellar nanocluster (T-MAN). After injection, T-MAN accumulated preferentially in MMP2-positive cells of gastric tumors and metastatic sites, generating fluorescence/magnetic resonance bioimaging-guided photothermal therapy. Recently, magnetic compounds based on graphene nanomaterials, GO-IONPs, have been exploited to delineate RLNs in pancreatic cancer.

Table 4 Magnetic nanoparticles for the metastatic node imaging and cancer treatment
Full size table

Meanwhile, GO-IONP-mediated photothermal therapy exhibited an excellent ability to photothermally ablate RLN and cancer cells [108]. Applications of these nano-theranostic agents could provide promising strategies for the imaging and treatment of primary tumors and their metastatic nodules in general. In particular, the design of multimodality imaging-based tumor biomarker-targeted nanocomposites holds great promise, as it can offer enhanced specificity for cancer theranostics in clinical management.

Implications and future directions

As demonstrated by the reports highlighted in this review, the appearance of MNPs has already revolutionized our understanding of LN mapping. The development of MNPs, including IONPs, has proposed a promising functional platform that displays the capability to detect tumor metastasis early. As a helpful platform, these MNPs could also carry several different ligands for cancer imaging and treatment [109]. The incorporation of multiple components into magnetic nanomaterials allows the delivery of cargo to manage disease progression sensitively. In addition, the targeted transport of drugs or probes to disease sites can potentially weaken adverse effects [110]. The successful synthesis of a radio-labeled folate-mediated delivery system allowed for the integration of SPION and the chemotherapeutic drug docetaxel. This delivery system demonstrated remarkable distribution efficiency within folate receptor-positive tumor cells [111]. A Fe3O4-based magnetocaloric nanocarrier based on nanoparticles was designed to carry 4-amino-2-pentylselenoquinazoline and exhibited high specificity and selectivity against various cancer cells [112]. Kim et al. [113] constructed a thioketal-linked amphiphilic nano-assembly (MTS) to encapsulate hydrophobic manganese oxide (HMO). After intravenous injection, these MTS@HMO nanoparticles could be effectively absorbed by tumor cells, consequently inducing significant hydrogen peroxide scavenging and improving radiotherapy-mediated tumor elimination. Thus, we proposed that these magnetic systems could be developed to elucidate the potential activities of anti-cancer agents. However, some critical issues should be carefully addressed before magnetic nanomaterials are approved as theranostic compounds for clinical application.

As a rule, MNPs have been considered innocuous and biocompatible methods for biological applications in vivo. During the medication period, MNPs are relatively safe and well tolerated. Apart from some mild or moderate events, such as headache, back pain, vasodilatation, and urticaria, no serious adverse effects have been observed after injection of ferumoxtran-10 at the diagnostic dose (2.6 mg Fe/kg body weight) [56]. However, in rats injected with very high dose levels of ferumoxtran-10 (126–400 mg Fe/kg), Bourrinet et al. observed treatment-related toxic effects, such as breathing difficulties, swollen snout, darkening of the body areas, etc. [114]. These unexpected risks to chronic health might be due to iron-initiated oxidative stress, which ultimately damages cellular macromolecules and organelles [115]. In bronchial epithelial cells, treatment with Fe3O4 nanoparticles could generate lipid peroxidation and oxidative damage by promoting intracellular glutathione consumption and decreasing glutathione-S-transferase activity [116]. Under oxidative stress, iron-induced lipid peroxidation is closely related to the cellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) potentially harmful to living organisms [117].

Similarly, Gamal et al. found that MNPs could alter the activity of antioxidant enzymes and stimulate ROS production, ultimately leading to damage due to oxidative stress in the rat testes [118]. However, coating MNPs with chemical modification might alleviate their toxic impacts. Cellular experimental evidence revealed the minor effects of PEG-modified SPIONs on the biological behaviors of human fibroblasts [119]. Due to their prominent stability and negligible cytotoxicity, mannan-coated SPIONs have great potential for specific tracking of cancer cells in SLNs [29]. Polycaprolactone/chitosan-covered iron oxide prolonged the survival time of tumor-bearing mice without any toxic responses [120]. Therefore, these tests have indicated that the coating materials can effectively protect MNPs, enhancing their stability and demonstrating distinguished biocompatibility. Furthermore, the exploration and development of stabilized micelles open the possibility of IONPs as alternative MRI CAs for bioimaging [121].

Although MNP-based approaches have strong potential for the early diagnosis of MLN in cancer patients, their distribution in body fluids or cells has yet to be clarified. Surface properties have an important influence on the distribution, elimination, and bioavailability of MNPs [122]. Among these, the surface charge of MNPs is a critical element in controlling the final intracellular distribution [123]. The surface charge of the MNPs was mainly analyzed using the zeta potential [124]. Commercial MNPs frequently possess an intrinsic negative charge [125]. To explain this phenomenon, Al-Obaidy and colleagues [126] evaluated the physiochemical characteristics of SPIONs in vitro and in vivo. They found that the negative zeta-potential charge of SPIONs effectively prevented the formation of aggregates, resulting in suitable polydispersity ratios. IONPs with a surface charge of -31 mV exhibit good colloidal stability under physiological conditions [127]. However, compared to negatively charged MNPs, cultured cells more easily internalized the positively charged nanoparticles. Using quantitative methods, Calatayud et al. [128] demonstrated that almost 100% of positive MNPs were absorbed by SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell lines, while the uptake rates of negative MNPs remained less than 50%. Such differences might be due to electrostatic interactions between the negative charge of the cell outer membrane and the positive charge of the nanoparticles [129]. Further investigations are required regarding the surface charge, which will become a pivotal issue in the biomedical fields of MNPs.

Conclusions

The discovery of cancer cell dissemination in SLN has established lymphatic vessels as one of the frequent pathways for cancer cell metastasis. Furthermore, the state of the lymph nodes is recognized as a crucial prognostic and therapeutic factor for cancer patients. Many studies have emphasized the biological significance of LN diagnosis in carcinogenesis and have highlighted the positive impact of LN resection in treating cancer patients with LN infiltration. As a result, there is an urgent need to explore useful technical methods for the preoperative and intraoperative confirmation of macro and micro-metastatic LNs. The emergence of nanomedicine technologies has introduced novel and promising nanoprobes, such as MNPs, for molecular imaging of metastatic LNs.

Data Availability

The data used to support this review are included in this article.

Abbreviations

LNM:

lymph node metastasis

LNs:

lymph nodes

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

CT:

computed tomography

RLNs:

regional lymph nodes

PET/CT:

positron emission tomography/computed tomography

MNPs:

magnetic nanoparticles

IONP:

iron oxide nanoparticle

NIR:

near infrared

SPIONs:

superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

CAs:

contrast agents

USPIOs:

ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides

PEG:

poly(ethyleneglycol)

sLeX:

Sialyl Lewis X

PSMA:

prostate specific membrane antigen

LECs:

lymphatic endothelial cells

ICG:

indocyanine green

Gd:

gadolinium

MMP2:

matrix metalloprotease-2

References

  1. Angelousi A, Hayes AR, Chatzellis E, Kaltsas GA, Grossman AB. Metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: a new way forward. Endocrine-related Cancer. 2022;29(7):R85–R103.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang T, Xie L, Zhou S, Liu Y, Huang Y, Mei N, et al. Metformin and histone deacetylase inhibitor based anti-inflammatory nanoplatform for epithelial-mesenchymal transition suppression and metastatic tumor treatment. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):394.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadrkhanloo M, Entezari M, Orouei S, Ghollasi M, Fathi N, Rezaei S, et al. STAT3-EMT axis in tumors: modulation of cancer metastasis, stemness and therapy response. Pharmacol Res. 2022;182:106311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang Y, Gu J, Li X, Xue C, Ba L, Gao Y, et al. HIF-1alpha promotes the migration and invasion of cancer-associated fibroblasts by miR-210. Aging and Disease. 2021;12(7):1794–807.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng H, Yuan C, Cai J, Pu W, Wu P, Li C, et al. Early diagnosis of breast cancer lung metastasis by nanoprobe-based luminescence imaging of the pre-metastatic niche. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Qiao C, Wang H, Guan Q, Wei M, Li Z. Ferroptosis-based nano delivery systems targeted therapy for colorectal cancer: insights and future perspectives. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2022;17(5):613–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(8):563–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sugiyama S, Iwai T, Baba J, Oguri S, Izumi T, Sekino M, et al. MR lymphography with superparamagnetic iron oxide for sentinel lymph node mapping of N0 early oral cancer: a pilot study. Dento Maxillo Fac Radiol. 2021;50(4):20200333.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jayaprakasam VS, Alvarez J, Omer DM, Gollub MJ, Smith JJ, Petkovska I. Watch-and-wait Approach to rectal Cancer: the role of imaging. Radiology. 2023;307(1):e221529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davenport MS. Incidental findings and low-value care. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023:1–7.

  11. Bowen SR, Nyflot MJ, Gensheimer M, Hendrickson KR, Kinahan PE, Sandison GA, et al. Challenges and opportunities in patient-specific, motion-managed and PET/CT-guided radiation therapy of lung cancer: review and perspective. Clin Translational Med. 2012;1(1):18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thoeny HC, Barbieri S, Froehlich JM, Turkbey B, Choyke PL. Functional and targeted lymph node imaging in prostate Cancer: current Status and Future Challenges. Radiology. 2017;285(3):728–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pouw JJ, Grootendorst MR, Klaase JM, van Baarlen J, Ten Haken B. Ex vivo sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer using a magnetic nanoparticle tracer to improve staging accuracy: a pilot study. Colorectal Disease: The Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. 2016;18(12):1147–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Donohoe KJ, Carroll BJ, Chung DKV, Dibble EH, Diego E, Giammarile F, et al. Summary: Appropriate Use Criteria for Lymphoscintigraphy in Sentinel Node Mapping and Lymphedema/Lipedema. Journal of nuclear medicine: official publication. Soc Nuclear Med. 2023;64(4):525–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Montagna G, Zhang J, Sevilimedu V, Charyn J, Abbate K, Gomez EA, et al. Risk factors and racial and ethnic disparities in patients with breast Cancer-related Lymphedema. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(8):1195–200.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallo J, Long NJ, Aboagye EO. Magnetic nanoparticles as contrast agents in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(19):7816–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Han M, Kang R, Zhang C. Lymph node mapping for Tumor Micrometastasis. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering. 2022;8(6):2307–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurochkin MA, German SV, Abalymov A, Vorontsov Dcapital AC, Gorin DA, Novoselova MV. Sentinel lymph node detection by combining nonradioactive techniques with contrast agents: state of the art and prospects. J Biophotonics. 2022;15(1):e202100149.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Feldman AS, McDougal WS, Harisinghani MG. The potential of nanoparticle-enhanced imaging. Urol Oncol. 2008;26(1):65–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai G, Rockall AG. Lymph node imaging in gynecologic malignancy. Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR. 2010;31(5):363–76.

  21. Fortuin AS, Bruggemann R, van der Linden J, Panfilov I, Israel B, Scheenen TWJ et al. Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxides for metastatic lymph node detection: back on the block. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology. 2018;10(1).

  22. Harisinghani M, Ross RW, Guimaraes AR, Weissleder R. Utility of a new bolus-injectable nanoparticle for clinical cancer staging. Neoplasia. 2007;9(12):1160–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho HR, Choi SH, Lee N, Hyeon T, Kim H, Moon WK. Macrophages homing to metastatic lymph nodes can be monitored with ultrasensitive ferromagnetic iron-oxide nanocubes and a 1.5T clinical MR scanner. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e29575.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lei J, Xue HD, Li Z, Li S, Jin ZY. Possible pathological basis for false diagnoses of lymph nodes by USPIO-enhanced MRI in rabbits. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI. 2010;31(6):1428–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou Z, Chen H, Lipowska M, Wang L, Yu Q, Yang X, et al. A dual-modal magnetic nanoparticle probe for preoperative and intraoperative mapping of sentinel lymph nodes by magnetic resonance and near infrared fluorescence imaging. J Biomater Appl. 2013;28(1):100–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ittrich H, Peldschus K, Raabe N, Kaul M, Adam G. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in biomedicine: applications and developments in diagnostics and therapy. RoFo: Fortschr auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. 2013;185(12):1149–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Néel L. Théorie du traînage magnétique des ferromagnétiques en grains fins avec application aux terres cuites. Ann de Géophysique. 1949;5:99–136.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vangijzegem T, Lecomte V, Ternad I, Van Leuven L, Muller RN, Stanicki D et al. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPION): from Fundamentals to State-of-the-art innovative applications for Cancer Therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(1).

  29. Vu-Quang H, Yoo MK, Jeong HJ, Lee HJ, Muthiah M, Rhee JH, et al. Targeted delivery of mannan-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to antigen-presenting cells for magnetic resonance-based diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(11):3935–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Visscher M, Pouw JJ, van Baarlen J, Klaase JM, Ten Haken B. Quantitative analysis of superparamagnetic contrast agent in sentinel lymph nodes using ex vivo vibrating sample magnetometry. IEEE Trans Bio Med Eng. 2013;60(9):2594–602.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lai CH, Yen TC, Ng KK. Surgical and radiologic staging of cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obst Gynecol. 2010;22(1):15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lee Y, Lee JS, Kim CM, Jeong JY, Choi JI, Kim MJ. Area of paradoxical signal drop after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide on the T2-weighted image of a patient with lymphangitic metastasis of the liver. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;26(4):577–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kitamura N, Kosuda S, Araki K, Tomifuji M, Mizokami D, Shiotani A, et al. Comparison of animal studies between interstitial magnetic resonance lymphography and radiocolloid SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy in the head and neck region. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(3):281–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Will O, Purkayastha S, Chan C, Athanasiou T, Darzi AW, Gedroyc W, et al. Diagnostic precision of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for lymph-node metastases: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(1):52–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Grootendorst DJ, Jose J, Fratila RM, Visscher M, Velders AH, Ten Haken B, et al. Evaluation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (Endorem(R)) as a photoacoustic contrast agent for intra-operative nodal staging. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2013;8(1):83–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pantiora E, Tasoulis MK, Valachis A, Eriksson S, Kuhn T, Karakatsanis A, et al. Evolution and refinement of magnetically guided sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2023;110(4):410–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Minamiya Y, Ito M, Hosono Y, Kawai H, Saito H, Katayose Y, et al. Subpleural injection of tracer improves detection of mediastinal sentinel lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J cardio-thoracic Surgery: Official J Eur Association Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2007;32(5):770–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang F, Zhu L, Huang X, Niu G, Chen X. Differentiation of reactive and tumor metastatic lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted and SPIO-enhanced MRI. Mol Imaging Biology. 2013;15(1):40–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Grootendorst DJ, Fratila RM, Visscher M, Haken BT, van Wezel RJ, Rottenberg S, et al. Intra-operative ex vivo photoacoustic nodal staging in a rat model using a clinical superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle dispersion. J Biophotonics. 2013;6(6–7):493–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson L, Pinder SE, Douek M. Deposition of superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles in axillary sentinel lymph nodes following subcutaneous injection. Histopathology. 2013;62(3):481–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Winter A, Kowald T, Engels S, Wawroschek F. Magnetic resonance sentinel lymph node imaging and magnetometer-guided intraoperative detection in Penile Cancer, using Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: first results. Urol Int. 2020;104(3–4):177–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Motoyama S, Ishiyama K, Maruyama K, Narita K, Minamiya Y, Ogawa J. Estimating the need for neck lymphadenectomy in submucosal esophageal cancer using superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: clinical validation study. World J Surg. 2012;36(1):83–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Motomura K, Ishitobi M, Komoike Y, Koyama H, Noguchi A, Sumino H, et al. SPIO-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of metastases in sentinel nodes localized by computed tomography lymphography in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(12):3422–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Motomura K, Izumi T, Tateishi S, Sumino H, Noguchi A, Horinouchi T, et al. Correlation between the area of high-signal intensity on SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and the pathologic size of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes. BMC Med Imaging. 2013;13:32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gupta S, Rajesh A. Magnetic resonance imaging of penile cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2014;22(2):191–9. vi.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li X, Xu C, Yu Y, Guo Y, Sun H. Prediction of lymphovascular space invasion using a combination of tenascin-C, cox-2, and PET/CT radiomics in patients with early-stage cervical squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):866.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Song J, Hu Q, Huang J, Chen T, Ma Z, Shi H. MR targeted imaging for the expression of tenascin-C in cervical cancer. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1090):20170681.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang G, Li W, Shi G, Tian Y, Kong L, Ding N, et al. Sensitive and specific detection of breast cancer lymph node metastasis through dual-modality magnetic particle imaging and fluorescence molecular imaging: a preclinical evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(8):2723–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cleaveland P, Lau M, Parnham A, Murby B, Ashworth D, Manohoran P, et al. Testing the feasibility of SentiMag/Sienna + for detecting Inguinal Sentinel Nodes in Penile Cancer (SentiPen): an eUROGEN and National Cancer Research Institute Trial. Eur Urol. 2019;76(6):874–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sreedhar S, Maloney J, Hudson S. Introducing SentiMag in a rural setting: a 5-year experience. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91(11):2404–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pouw JJ, Grootendorst MR, Bezooijen R, Klazen CA, De Bruin WI, Klaase JM, et al. Pre-operative sentinel lymph node localization in breast cancer with superparamagnetic iron oxide MRI: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial imaging subprotocol. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1056):20150634.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Nune SK, Gunda P, Majeti BK, Thallapally PK, Forrest ML. Advances in lymphatic imaging and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63(10–11):876–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ganeshalingam S, Koh DM. Nodal staging. Cancer Imaging: The Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society. 2009;9(1):104–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Griffin LR, Frank C, Rao S, Seguin B. Lymphotropic nanoparticle magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing metastatic lymph nodes in dogs with malignant head and neck tumours. Veterinary and comparative oncology. 2023.

  55. Jain R, Dandekar P, Patravale V. Diagnostic nanocarriers for sentinel lymph node imaging. J Controlled Release: Official J Controlled Release Soc. 2009;138(2):90–102.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Anzai Y, Piccoli CW, Outwater EK, Stanford W, Bluemke DA, Nurenberg P, et al. Evaluation of neck and body metastases to nodes with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging: phase III safety and efficacy study. Radiology. 2003;228(3):777–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shen N, Tan J, Wang P, Wang J, Shi Y, Lv W, et al. Indirect magnetic resonance imaging lymphography identifies lymph node metastasis in rabbit pyriform sinus VX2 carcinoma using ultra-small super-paramagnetic iron oxide. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e94876.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Triantafyllou M, Studer UE, Birkhauser FD, Fleischmann A, Bains LJ, Petralia G, et al. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide allow for the detection of metastases in normal sized pelvic lymph nodes of patients with bladder and/or prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(3):616–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Choi SH, Kim KH, Moon WK, Kim HC, Cha JH, Paik JH, et al. Comparison of lymph node metastases assessment with the use of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T versus 3.0 T in a rabbit model. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI. 2010;31(1):134–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Oghabian MA, Gharehaghaji N, Amirmohseni S, Khoei S, Guiti M. Detection sensitivity of lymph nodes of various sizes using USPIO nanoparticles in magnetic resonance imaging. Nanomedicine: Nanatechnol Biology Med. 2010;6(3):496–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Philips BWJ, Stijns RCH, Rietsch SHG, Brunheim S, Barentsz JO, Fortuin AS, et al. USPIO-enhanced MRI of pelvic lymph nodes at 7-T: preliminary experience. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(12):6529–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Froehlich JM, Triantafyllou M, Fleischmann A, Vermathen P, Thalmann GN, Thoeny HC. Does quantification of USPIO uptake-related signal loss allow differentiation of benign and malignant normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes? Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2012;7(3):346–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Fortuin AS, Smeenk RJ, Meijer HJ, Witjes AJ, Barentsz JO. Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential. Curr Urol Rep. 2014;15(3):389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fortuin A, van Asten J, Veltien A, Philips B, Hambrock T, Johst S, et al. Small suspicious lymph nodes detected on Ultrahigh-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with prostate Cancer with high risk of nodal metastases: the First In-patient study on Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced 7T MRI. Eur Urol. 2023;83(4):375–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Pultrum BB, van der Jagt EJ, van Westreenen HL, van Dullemen HM, Kappert P, Groen H, et al. Detection of lymph node metastases with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oesophageal cancer: a feasibility study. Cancer Imaging: The Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society. 2009;9(1):19–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. de Gouw D, Maas MC, Slagt C, Muhling J, Nakamoto A, Klarenbeek BR, et al. Controlled mechanical ventilation to detect regional lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer using USPIO-enhanced MRI; comparison of image quality. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;74:258–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Griffin L, Frank CB, Seguin B. Pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI for diagnosis of metastatic disease in canine head and neck tumours. Vet Comp Oncol. 2020;18(2):176–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kim SH, Oh SN, Choi HS, Lee HS, Jun J, Nam Y, et al. USPIO enhanced lymph node MRI using 3D multi-echo GRE in a rabbit model. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2016;11(6):544–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Pandharipande PV, Mora JT, Uppot RN, Goehler A, Braschi M, Halpern EF, et al. Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for independent prediction of lymph node malignancy: a logistic regression model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(3):W230–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zamecnik P, Israel B, Feuerstein J, Nagarajah J, Gotthardt M, Barentsz JO, et al. Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced 3-T magnetic resonance angiography of pelvic arteries: initial experience. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(6):1802–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fortuin AS, Deserno WM, Meijer HJ, Jager GJ, Takahashi S, Debats OA, et al. Value of PET/CT and MR lymphography in treatment of prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(3):712–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tatsumi Y, Tanigawa N, Nishimura H, Nomura E, Mabuchi H, Matsuki M, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer by magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxtran-10. Gastric cancer: Official Journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2006;9(2):120–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Tokuhara T, Tanigawa N, Matsuki M, Nomura E, Mabuchi H, Lee SW, et al. Evaluation of lymph node metastases in gastric cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO): diagnostic performance in post-contrast images using new diagnostic criteria. Gastric cancer: Official Journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2008;11(4):194–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Schilham MGM, Zamecnik P, Prive BM, Israel B, Rijpkema M, Scheenen T, et al. Head-to-Head comparison of (68)Ga-Prostate-specific membrane Antigen PET/CT and Ferumoxtran-10-Enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastases in prostate Cancer patients. Journal of nuclear medicine: official publication. Soc Nuclear Med. 2021;62(9):1258–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Harisinghani MG, Dixon WT, Saksena MA, Brachtel E, Blezek DJ, Dhawale PJ, et al. MR lymphangiography: imaging strategies to optimize the imaging of lymph nodes with ferumoxtran-10. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America Inc. 2004;24(3):867–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Yoo RE, Cho HR, Choi SH, Won JK, Kim JH, Sohn CH. Optimization of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (P904)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of lymph nodes: initial experience in a mouse model. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(10):5389–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Yoo RE, Choi SH, Cho HR, Jeon BS, Kwon E, Kim EG, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes in a rabbit model: efficacy of PJY10, a new ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide agent, with monodisperse iron oxide core and multiple-interaction ligands. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e107583.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Nie Y, Rui Y, Miao C, Li Q, Hu F, Gu H. A stable USPIO capable for MR lymphography with ultra-low effective dosage. Nanomedicine: Nanatechnol Biology Med. 2020;29:102233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Miao C, Hu F, Rui Y, Duan Y, Gu H. A T(1)/T(2) dual functional iron oxide MRI contrast agent with super stability and low hypersensitivity benefited by ultrahigh carboxyl group density. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(12):2081–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Birkhauser FD, Studer UE, Froehlich JM, Triantafyllou M, Bains LJ, Petralia G, et al. Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging facilitates detection of metastases in normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes of patients with bladder and prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2013;64(6):953–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Thoeny HC, Triantafyllou M, Birkhaeuser FD, Froehlich JM, Tshering DW, Binser T, et al. Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reliably detect pelvic lymph node metastases in normal-sized nodes of bladder and prostate cancer patients. Eur Urol. 2009;55(4):761–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Liu L, Liu L, Li Y, Huang X, Gu D, Wei B, et al. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic nanoparticles targeting E-selectin: synthesis and effects in mice in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:4517–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Bonvin D, Bastiaansen JAM, Stuber M, Hofmann H, Mionic Ebersold M. Folic acid on iron oxide nanoparticles: platform with high potential for simultaneous targeting, MRI detection and hyperthermia treatment of lymph node metastases of prostate cancer. Dalton Trans. 2017;46(37):12692–704.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. van Spiekerman MA, van Haaren ERM, Aldenhoven L, Frotscher CNA, Korver-Steeman R, van Bastelaar J, et al. An adapted protocol for magnetic localisation of nonpalpable breast cancer lesions and sentinel lymph nodes using a magnetic seed and superparamagnetic iron oxide tracer. J Surg Oncol. 2023;127(5):776–81.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Ahmed M, Douek M. What is the future of magnetic nanoparticles in the axillary management of breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;143(2):213–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Huuska N, Netti E, Lehti S, Kovanen PT, Niemela M, Tulamo R. Lymphatic vessels are present in human saccular intracranial aneurysms. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022;10(1):130.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Wu S, Liu X, He J, Wang H, Luo Y, Gong W, et al. A dual targeting magnetic nanoparticle for Human Cancer Detection. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2019;14(1):228.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Fu X, Fu S, Cai Z, Jin R, Xia C, Lui S, et al. Manganese porphyrin/ICG nanoparticles as magnetic resonance/fluorescent dual-mode probes for imaging of sentinel lymph node metastasis. J Mater Chem B. 2022;10(48):10065–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Mihara K, Matsuda S, Nakamura Y, Aiura K, Kuwahata A, Chikaki S, et al. Intraoperative laparoscopic detection of sentinel lymph nodes with indocyanine green and superparamagnetic iron oxide in a swine gallbladder cancer model. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0248531.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Cousins A, Krishnan S, Krishnan G, Pham N, Milanova V, Nelson M, et al. Preclinical evaluation of sentinel node localization in the stomach via mannose-labelled magnetic nanoparticles and indocyanine green. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(8):6185–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Kuwahata A, Tanaka R, Matsuda S, Amada E, Irino T, Mayanagi S, et al. Development of magnetic probe for Sentinel Lymph Node detection in laparoscopic Navigation for gastric Cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1798.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Belyaev VK, Rodionova VV, Grunin AA, Inoue M, Fedyanin AA. Magnetic field sensor based on magnetoplasmonic crystal. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):7133.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Partridge SC, Kurland BF, Liu CL, Ho RJ, Ruddell A. Tumor-induced lymph node alterations detected by MRI lymphography using gadolinium nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15641.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang F, Huang X, Qian C, Zhu L, Hida N, Niu G, et al. Synergistic enhancement of iron oxide nanoparticle and gadolinium for dual-contrast MRI. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;425(4):886–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Kosaka N, Bernardo M, Mitsunaga M, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. MR and optical imaging of early micrometastases in lymph nodes: triple labeling with nano-sized agents yielding distinct signals. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2012;7(2):247–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Koyama Y, Talanov VS, Bernardo M, Hama Y, Regino CA, Brechbiel MW, et al. A dendrimer-based nanosized contrast agent dual-labeled for magnetic resonance and optical fluorescence imaging to localize the sentinel lymph node in mice. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI. 2007;25(4):866–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Rasouli Z, Riyahi-Alam N, Khoobi M, Haghgoo S, Gholibegloo E, Ebrahimpour A, et al. Lymph node metastases detection using gd(2)O(3)@PCD as Novel Multifunctional contrast Imaging Agent in Metabolic magnetic resonance Molecular Imaging. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022;2022:5425851.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Chen KJ, Wolahan SM, Wang H, Hsu CH, Chang HW, Durazo A, et al. A small MRI contrast agent library of gadolinium(III)-encapsulated supramolecular nanoparticles for improved relaxivity and sensitivity. Biomaterials. 2011;32(8):2160–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Zhou Z, Liu H, Chi X, Chen J, Wang L, Sun C, et al. A Protein-Corona-Free T(1)-T(2) dual-modal contrast Agent for Accurate Imaging of Lymphatic Tumor Metastasis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(51):28286–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Yang Y, Zhou B, Zhou J, Shi X, Sha Y, Wu H. Assessment of lingual sentinel lymph nodes metastases using dual-modal indirect CT/MR lymphography with gold-gadolinium-based nanoprobes in a tongue VX(2) carcinoma model. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(8):727–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Dong J, Sun J, Cai W, Guo C, Wang Q, Zhao X, et al. A natural cuttlefish melanin nanoprobe for preoperative and intraoperative mapping of lymph nodes. Nanomedicine: Nanatechnol Biology Med. 2022;41:102510.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Huang X, Zhang F, Lee S, Swierczewska M, Kiesewetter DO, Lang L, et al. Long-term multimodal imaging of tumor draining sentinel lymph nodes using mesoporous silica-based nanoprobes. Biomaterials. 2012;33(17):4370–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Qiao R, Liu C, Liu M, Hu H, Liu C, Hou Y, et al. Ultrasensitive in vivo detection of primary gastric tumor and lymphatic metastasis using upconversion nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2015;9(2):2120–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Liang C, Song X, Chen Q, Liu T, Song G, Peng R, et al. Magnetic field-enhanced photothermal ablation of Tumor Sentinel Lymph Nodes to inhibit Cancer Metastasis. Small. 2015;11(37):4856–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Cai W, Fan G, Zhou H, Chen L, Ge J, Huang B, et al. Self-assembled hybrid nanocomposites for Multimodal Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy of Lymph Node Metastasis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(44):49407–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Niu C, Wang Z, Lu G, Krupka TM, Sun Y, You Y, et al. Doxorubicin loaded superparamagnetic PLGA-iron oxide multifunctional microbubbles for dual-mode US/MR imaging and therapy of metastasis in lymph nodes. Biomaterials. 2013;34(9):2307–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Shi H, Sun Y, Yan R, Liu S, Zhu L, Liu S, et al. Magnetic Semiconductor Gd-Doping CuS Nanoparticles as Activatable Nanoprobes for Bimodal Imaging and targeted photothermal therapy of gastric tumors. Nano Lett. 2019;19(2):937–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Wang S, Zhang Q, Luo XF, Li J, He H, Yang F, et al. Magnetic graphene-based nanotheranostic agent for dual-modality mapping guided photothermal therapy in regional lymph nodal metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Biomaterials. 2014;35(35):9473–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Zhang C, Wang M, Zhang J, Zou B, Wang Y. Self-template synthesis of mesoporous and biodegradable Fe(3)O(4) nanospheres as multifunctional nanoplatform for cancer therapy. Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2023;229:113467.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Pusta A, Tertis M, Craciunescu I, Turcu R, Mirel S, Cristea C. Recent advances in the development of drug delivery applications of magnetic nanomaterials. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(7).

  111. Cetin O, Gungor B, Ichedef C, Parlak Y, Bilgin ES, Ustun F, et al. Development of a radiolabeled folate-mediated drug delivery system for effective delivery of Docetaxel. ACS Omega. 2023;8(28):25316–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Galarreta-Rodriguez I, Etxebeste-Mitxeltorena M, Moreno E, Plano D, Sanmartin C, Megahed S et al. Preparation of Selenium-Based Drug-Modified Polymeric Ligand-Functionalised Fe(3)O(4) Nanoparticles as Multimodal Drug Carrier and Magnetic Hyperthermia Inductor. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(7).

  113. Kim S, Sundaram A, Mathew AP, Hareshkumar VS, Mohapatra A, Thomas RG et al. In situ hypoxia modulating nano-catalase for amplifying DNA damage in radiation resistive colon tumors. Biomaterials Sci. 2023.

  114. Bourrinet P, Bengele HH, Bonnemain B, Dencausse A, Idee JM, Jacobs PM, et al. Preclinical safety and pharmacokinetic profile of ferumoxtran-10, an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2006;41(3):313–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Yarjanli Z, Ghaedi K, Esmaeili A, Rahgozar S, Zarrabi A. Iron oxide nanoparticles may damage to the neural tissue through iron accumulation, oxidative stress, and protein aggregation. BMC Neurosci. 2017;18(1):51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhang W, Gao J, Lu L, Bold T, Li X, Wang S, et al. Intracellular GSH/GST antioxidants system change as an earlier biomarker for toxicity evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticles. NanoImpact. 2021;23:100338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Kicheeva AG, Sushko ES, Bondarenko LS, Kydralieva KA, Pankratov DA, Tropskaya NS et al. Functionalized Magnetite Nanoparticles: characterization, Bioeffects, and role of reactive oxygen species in Unicellular and Enzymatic Systems. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2).

  118. Gamal A, Kortam LE, El Ghareeb AEW, El Rahman HAA. Assessment of the potential toxic effect of magnetite nanoparticles on the male reproductive system based on immunological and molecular studies. Andrologia. 2022;54(11):e14613.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Gupta AK, Curtis AS. Surface modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery: interaction studies with human fibroblasts in culture. J Mater Sci - Mater Med. 2004;15(4):493–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Kiamohammadi L, Asadi L, Shirvalilou S, Khoei S, Khoee S, Soleymani M, et al. Physical and Biological Properties of 5-Fluorouracil Polymer-Coated Magnetite Nanographene Oxide as a new thermosensitizer for alternative magnetic hyperthermia and a magnetic resonance imaging contrast Agent: in Vitro and in vivo study. ACS Omega. 2021;6(31):20192–204.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Andrade RGD, Veloso SRS, Castanheira EMS. Shape Anisotropic Iron Oxide-Based magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis and Biomedical Applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(7).

  122. Gupta AK, Wells S. Surface-modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery: preparation, characterization, and cytotoxicity studies. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci. 2004;3(1):66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Amigoni L, Salvioni L, Sciandrone B, Giustra M, Pacini C, Tortora P et al. Impact of tuning the surface charge distribution on Colloidal Iron Oxide Nanoparticle toxicity investigated in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(6).

  124. Hajiali S, Daneshjou S, Daneshjoo S. Biomimetic synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles from Bacillus megaterium to be used in hyperthermia therapy. AMB Express. 2022;12(1):145.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Szymczyk A, Drozd M, Kaminska A, Matczuk M, Trzaskowski M, Mazurkiewicz-Pawlicka M et al. Comparative evaluation of different Surface Coatings of Fe(3)O(4)-Based magnetic Nano Sorbent for Applications in the nucleic acids extraction. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(16).

  126. Al-Obaidy R, Haider AJ, Al-Musawi S, Arsad N. Targeted delivery of paclitaxel drug using polymer-coated magnetic nanoparticles for fibrosarcoma therapy: in vitro and in vivo studies. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3180.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Dutta B, Rawoot YA, Checker S, Shelar SB, Barick KC, Kumar S, et al. Micellar assisted aqueous stabilization of iron oxide nanoparticles for curcumin encapsulation and hyperthermia application. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2020;22:100466.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Calatayud MP, Sanz B, Raffa V, Riggio C, Ibarra MR, Goya GF. The effect of surface charge of functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles on protein adsorption and cell uptake. Biomaterials. 2014;35(24):6389–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Imran M, Ehrhardt CJ, Bertino MF, Shah MR, Yadavalli VK. Chitosan stabilized silver nanoparticles for the Electrochemical detection of Lipopolysaccharide: a facile Biosensing Approach for Gram-Negative Bacteria. Micromachines. 2020;11(4).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82272659), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2022RC1210, 2021RC3029) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021T140754, 2020M672521).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, China

    Yuanliang Yan, Yuanhong Liu & Qiuju Liang

  2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hubei University of Medicine, 442000, Shiyan, Hubei, China

    Tongfei Li

  3. Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, 60637, Chicago, IL, USA

    Abhimanyu Thakur & Kui Zhang

  4. Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, China

    Wei Liu & Zhijie Xu

  5. National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 410008, Changsha, Hunan, China

    Wei Liu & Zhijie Xu

  6. Department of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 271000, Taian, Shandong, China

    Yuzhen Xu

Authors
  1. Yuanliang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanhong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tongfei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qiuju Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Abhimanyu Thakur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhijie Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuzhen Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZX and YX: conception and design. YL, QL, TL, AT, KZ and WL: data curation. YY: writing the manuscript and revising the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhijie Xu or Yuzhen Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Y., Liu, Y., Li, T. et al. Functional roles of magnetic nanoparticles for the identification of metastatic lymph nodes in cancer patients. J Nanobiotechnol 21, 337 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02100-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02100-0

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us