Co-transfection of plasmid DNA and laser-generated gold nanoparticles does not disturb the bioactivity of GFP-HMGB1 fusion protein
- Svea Petersen†1,
- Jan T Soller†2, 3,
- Siegfried Wagner2, 3,
- Andreas Richter3,
- Jörn Bullerdiek2, 3,
- Ingo Nolte2,
- Stephan Barcikowski1, 4Email author and
- Hugo Murua Escobar2
© Petersen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 27 March 2009
Accepted: 24 October 2009
Published: 24 October 2009
Ultrashort pulsed laser ablation in liquids represents a powerful tool for the generation of pure gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) avoiding chemical precursors and thereby making them especially interesting for biomedical applications. However, because of their electron accepting properties, laser-generated AuNPs might affect biochemical properties of biomolecules, which often adsorb onto the nanoparticles. We investigated possible effects of such laser-generated AuNPs on biological functionality of DNA molecules. We tested four differently sized and positively charged AuNPs by incubating them with recombinant eGFP-C1-HMGB1 DNA expression plasmids that code for eGFP fusion proteins and contain the canine architectural transcription factor HMGB1. We were able to show that successfully transfected mammalian cells are still able to synthesize and process the fusion proteins. Our observations revealed that incubation of AuNP with the plasmid DNA encoding the recombinant canine HMGB1 neither prevented the mediated uptake of the vector through the plasma membrane in presence of a transfection reagent nor had any effect on the transport of the synthesized fusion proteins to the nuclei. Biological activity of the recombinant GFP-HMGB1 fusion protein appears to have not been affected either, as a strong characteristic protein accumulation in the nucleus could be observed. We also discovered that transfection efficiencies depend on the size of AuNP. In conclusion, our data indicate that laser-generated AuNPs present a good alternative to chemically synthesized nanoparticles for use in biomedical applications.
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are used widely for various biomedical applications including cell imaging , diagnostics , targeted drug delivery , and sensing . Various methods have been established for AuNP generation. Many of these rely on several chemical reactions or gas pyrolysis, showing the risk of impurities or agglomeration . Laser ablation in liquids showed to be a powerful tool with many advantages, having almost no restriction in the choice of source material and the ability of yielding highly pure colloidal particles[6–11]. These pure AuNPs are characterised by their unique surface chemistry free of surfactants, a feature unattainable by other methods [12–14]. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of such AuNPs revealed the presence of the oxidation states Au+ and Au3+ at the AuNP surface . In previous studies we demonstrated that unmodified DNA oligonucleotides adsorb easily onto these positively charged nanoparticles [16, 17], probably via amino- and keto-groups, which interact with the electron accepting surface of the generated AuNPs. However, these findings raised the possibility that more complex biomolecules could also be attracted and bound to such nanoparticles' surfaces, if incubated intentionally or unintentionally with colloidal laser-generated gold nanoparticles, even if no additional conjugation is envisaged. Such binding could have a strong effect on the properties of biomolecules and should be characterised with a view of their potential toxicity .
We therefore decided to analyse the possible effects of laser-generated AuNPs on DNA functionality. For this reason we incubated the charged particles with recombinant eGFP-C1-HMGB1 expression plasmids and subsequently transfected them into mammalian cells. As the HMGB1 protein is normally highly abundant in the cell nuclei, we were able to show that the treated expression plasmids are still functional and suitable for use as transcription matrix, because the transfected cells were still able to synthesize the fusion proteins, to process them and to transport them to their biofunctional destination. The effect of four differently sized nanoparticles on the activity of the eGFP-C1-HMGB1 plasmid was investigated by fluorescence microscopy. We additionally performed a binding assay to investigate structural effects on the plasmid due to AuNP co-incubation.
The particle mass concentration in the suspensions was determined by weighing the sediment after water evaporation.
Au-NP and eGFP-C1-HMGB1 vector in vitro transfection assay
The synthesised Au-NP suspensions were sterilized by filtration through a 0.2 μm filter device (Millex-GV Sterilizing Filter Unit, Millipore, Billerica, USA). Subsequently, 250 ng of each differently sized Au-NPs were incubated for 24 h at room temperature with 1 μg of recombinant plasmid eGFP-C1-HMGB1 in a total volume of 47 μl of ddH2O. The time of co-incubation was intentionally kept that long as we aimed to investigate possible effects on the vector due to nanoparticle interferences. This was only possible as the circular double-stranded plasmid is not susceptible to rapid degenerative processes.
The recombinant plasmid encodes an eGFP-HMGB1 fusion protein. The HMGB1 coding sequence was derived from canine cDNA using PCR amplification (primer pair EcoR1_B15'CGGAATTCACCATGGGCAAAGGAGA3'/KpnI_B1 (5'GCGGTACCTTATTCATCATCATC-3'). The obtained PCR products were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel, recovered with QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), cloned into the pEGFP-C1 vector plasmid (BD Bioscience Clontech) and sequenced. Twelve hours prior to transfection, 3 × 105 cells from canine mammary cell line MTH53a were seeded into 12 multi well plates. The cells were grown at 37°C and 5% CO2 in medium 199 (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented with 20% FCS, penicillin, and streptomycin. For transfection, 3 μl aliquots of Fugene HD (FHD) reagent (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) were added to 47 μl of different Au-NP/eGFP-C1-HMGB1 plasmid suspensions in a total volume of 50 μl and incubated for 15 min. The three control sample sets were: (i) 1 μg of eGFP-C1-HMGB1 DNA without nanoparticles, (ii) 250 ng of Au-NPs without any plasmid DNA, and (iii) a set of Au-NPs with DNA, but without the FHD.
Following 15 min incubation at 23°C, the respective 50 μl transfection mixtures were added to cell cultures. The cells were incubated for 48 hours in medium 199 (20% FCS) at 37°C and 5% CO2. The uptake of plasmid DNA and expression of the eGFP-C1-HMGB1 fusion protein were verified by fluorescence microscopy. All experiments were performed in quadruples.
Co-transfection of plasmid DNA and laser-generated gold nanoparticles
As the HMGB1 protein is a transcription factor, it binds strongly to nuclear DNA. We therefore may assume that cell nuclei containing strong eGFP fluorescence represent successful functional transfection events. All cells transfected with AuNP-incubated plasmid DNA showed strong colocalised eGFP and DAPI staining (Figure 2), whilst the negative controls, cells treated with Au-NP and FHD (AuNP of dh = 24 nm), showed no eGFP fluorescence (Figure 2K). We therefore conclude that co-incubation of AuNP with the plasmid DNA encoding the recombinant canine HMGB1 neither prevents the mediated uptake of the vector in presence of a transfection reagent nor has any visible effect on the transport and biological functionality of the synthesised fusion proteins.
By comparing fluorescence images of the cells co-incubated with the AuNPs of different sizes and to cells incubated without AuNPs, we were able to compare transfection efficiencies in each case. We estimate that the achieved efficiency of DNA transfection for the sample containing 14 nm AuNPs was approx. 15 ± 5% (Figure 2C and 2D).
Summary of estimated transfection efficiencies
Estimated Transfection Efficiency (%)
10 ± 2
A and B
15 ± 5
C and D
50 ± 5
E and F
50 ± 10
G and H
8 ± 3
I and J
K and L
In conclusion, incubation of uncoated, positively charged AuNPs with a DNA plasmid that encodes recombinant eGFP-C1-HMGB1 fusion protein for 24 hours before cellular transfection does not seem to alter the protein expression and the protein functionality (DNA binding), while the presence of AuNPs seems to have a significantly positive effect on the transfection efficiencies. The observed effect was size-dependent: medium sized AuNPs enhanced transfection efficiency nearly 6 fold. These results support the hypothesis that laser-generated AuNPs present a good alternative to chemically synthesized nanoparticles and are especially suitable for biomedical applications.
The work was funded in part by the German Research Foundation within the excellence cluster REBIRTH.
- Chen J, Saeki F, Wiley BJ, Chang H, Cobb MJ, Li ZY, Au L, Zhang H, Kimmey MB, Li X, Xia Y: Nano Lett. 2005, 5: 473-477. 10.1021/nl047950t.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen J, Wiley B, Campbell D, Saeki F, Cahng L, Au L, Lee J, Li X, Xia Y: Adv Mater. 2005, 17: 2255-10.1002/adma.200500833.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang PH, Sun X, Chiu JF, Sun H, Qing-Yu H: Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16: 494-496. 10.1021/bc049775d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu GL, Yin Y, Kunchakarra S, Mukherjee B, Gerion D, Jett SD, Bear DG, Gray JW, Alivisatos AP, Lee LP, Chen FF: Nat Nanotechnol. 2006, 1: 47-52. 10.1038/nnano.2006.51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dahl JA, Maddux BLS, Hutchison JE: Chem Rev. 2007, 107: 2228-2269. 10.1021/cr050943k.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mafuné F, Kohno J, Takeda Y, Kondow T, Sawabe H: J Phys Chem B. 2000, 104: 9111-9117. 10.1021/jp001336y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mafuné F, Kohno J, Takeda Y, Kondow T: J Phys Chem. 2001, 105: 9050-9056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dolgaev SI, Simakin AV, Voronov VV, Shafeev GA, Bozon-Verduraz F: Appl Surf Sci. 2002, 186: 546-551. 10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00634-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kabashin AV, Meunier M: J Appl Phys. 2003, 94: 7941-7943. 10.1063/1.1626793.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barcikowski S, Hahn A, Kabashin AV, Chichkov BN: J Appl Phys A. 2007, 87: 47-55. 10.1007/s00339-006-3852-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barcikowski S, Menéndez-Manjón A, Chichkov B, Brikas M, Raèiukaitis G: Appl Phys Lett. 2007, 91: 083113-1. 10.1063/1.2773937.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sylvestre JP, Kabashin AV, Sacher E, Meunier M, Luong JHT: J Am Chem Soc. 2004, 126: 7176-7177. 10.1021/ja048678s.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sylvestre JP, Poulin S, Kabashin AV, Sacher E, Meunier M, Luong JHT: J Phys Chem. 2004, 108: 16864-16869.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kabashin AV, Meunier M, Kingston C, Luong JHT: J Phys Chem B. 2003, 107: 4527-4531. 10.1021/jp034345q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sylvestre JP, Poulin S, Kabashin AV, Sacher E, Meunier M, Luong JHT: Phys Chem B. 2004, 108: 16864-16869. 10.1021/jp047134+.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petersen S, Jakobi J, Barcikowski S: Appl Surf Sci. 2009, 255: 5435-5438. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.064.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petersen S, Barcikowski S: Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19: 1167-1172. 10.1002/adfm.200801526.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Jong W, Borm PJA: Journal of Nanomedicine. 2008, 3: 133-149.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mafuné F, Kohno J, Takeda Y, Kondow TJ: Phys Chem B. 2001, 105: 9050-9056. 10.1021/jp0111620.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amendola V, Meneghetti M: Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009, 11: 3805-3821. 10.1039/b900654k.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.