Skip to main content
Download PDF

Enhancement of doxorubicin anti-cancer activity by vascular targeting using IsoDGR/cytokine-coated nanogold

Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 19, Article number: 128 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gold nanospheres tagged with peptides containing isoDGR (isoAsp-Gly-Arg), an αvβ3 integrin binding motif, represent efficient carriers for delivering pro-inflammatory cytokines to the tumor vasculature. We prepared bi- or trifunctional nanoparticles bearing tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) and/or interleukin-12 (IL12) plus a peptide containing isoDGR, and we tested their anti-cancer effects, alone or in combination with doxorubicin, in tumor-bearing mice.

Results

In vitro biochemical studies showed that both nanodrugs were monodispersed and functional in terms of binding to TNF and IL12 receptors and to αvβ3. In vivo studies performed in a murine model of fibrosarcoma showed that low doses of bifunctional nanoparticles bearing isoDGR and TNF (corresponding to few nanoparticles per cell) delayed tumor growth and increased the efficacy of doxorubicin without worsening its toxicity. Similar effects were obtained using trifunctional nanoparticles loaded with isoDGR, TNF and IL12. Mechanistic studies showed that nanoparticles bearing isoDGR and TNF could increase doxorubicin penetration in tumors a few hours after injection and caused vascular damage at later time points.

Conclusion

IsoDGR-coated gold nanospheres can be exploited as a versatile platform for single- or multi-cytokine delivery to cells of the tumor vasculature. Extremely low doses of isoDGR-coated nanodrugs functionalized with TNF or TNF plus IL12 can enhance doxorubicin anti-tumor activity.

Graphic Abstract

Background

The major limitation in using cytokines for cancer therapy is often related to their prohibitive toxicity and rapid induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms [1,2,3]. A growing body of evidence suggests that these obstacles can be overcome by strategies based on ligand-directed delivery of low-dose cytokines to tumors [4,5,6,7]. This approach can be achieved by cytokine conjugation to antibodies or peptide ligands that recognize specific receptors expressed by tumor cells or by other elements of the tumor microenvironment, including tumor vessels [4, 6]. For example, peptides containing Ans-Gly-Arg (NGR), Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD), or isoAsp-Gly-Arg (isoDGR) sequences selective for CD13 or integrins overexpressed by the tumor vasculature have been exploited as ligands for delivering tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) [7], interferon (IFN) α2a [8], or IFNγ [9] to tumors, consequently improving their therapeutic index [7, 10]. A prototypical compound belonging to this class of molecules is NGR-TNF, a peptide-cytokine conjugate that alters endothelial permeability and enhances the penetration of chemotherapeutic drugs in tumor tissues [3, 7]. Low doses of this drug have been tested in various clinical studies in patients with solid tumors, including patients with primary lymphomas of the central nervous system (PCNSL), with evidence of activity and good tolerability [7, 11,12,13,14]. Notably, in these patients, NGR-TNF altered the blood–brain barrier and increased the efficacy of R-CHOP, a chemo-immunotherapeutic regimen [13, 14]. The therapeutic index of TNF and other cytokines can also be increased by coupling cytokines with colloidal gold (Au), a well-tolerated nanomaterial that accumulates in tumors by “passive” targeting mechanisms consequent to the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects of abnormal vessels of tumor tissues [15,16,17,18,19]. We have recently shown that these “active” and “passive” targeting approaches (mediated by peptides and nanogold, respectively) can be combined to generate more efficient cytokine delivery systems. For example, we have shown that NGR-, methylated NGR-, or isoDGR-tagged gold nanoparticles represent efficient carriers for delivering TNF or IL12 to tumors [20,21,22,23]. Indeed, in animal models of solid tumors, these nanocarriers can deliver pharmacologically active amounts of TNF or IL12 to tumors, with no evidence of toxicity [20,21,22,23]. However, whether these targeted nanodrugs synergize with chemotherapy remains to be determined. The present study was undertaken to explore the capability of isoDGR-coated nanogold bearing TNF and/or IL12, alone or in combination, to synergize with chemotherapy. The rationale for exploring the TNF/IL12 combination, in addition to TNF alone, relies on the notion that IL12 can induce IFNγ in the tumor microenvironment [24, 25], a cytokine known to be critical for the activity of vasculature-targeted TNF [26]. Thus, we prepared gold nanoparticles (Nps) bearing TNF and/or IL12 and c(CGisoDGRG) (iso1), a head-to-tail cyclic peptide that recognizes αvβ3 integrin overexpressed in the tumor vasculature [27, 28]. We also tested their physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties in vitro and their therapeutic activity in a murine model of fibrosarcoma, alone or combined with doxorubicin (a chemotherapeutic drug). We show that an extremely low dose of nanogold functionalized with iso1 and TNF (bifunctional) or with iso1, TNF and IL12 (trifunctional) can increase the efficacy of doxorubicin without increasing its toxicity. Furthermore, we show that nanogold functionalized with iso1 and TNF increases doxorubicin penetration in tumors a few hours after injection and causes vascular damage at later time points.

Methods

Reagents

The following reagents were purchased: human serum albumin (HSA) 20% solution (Baxter, Deerfield, IL); bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma); human integrin αvβ3 (Immunological Sciences, Italy); methoxy-PEG-SH (MW 20 KDa, PEG) (Nanocs Inc, USA); soluble TNF receptor Type-II (sTNF-R2) fused to the Fc fragment of an IgG1 antibody (Enbrel) (Pfizer, Italy); monoclonal antibody (mAb) anti-IL12/IL23, p40 subunit, clone C15.6 and C17.8 (Biolegend, USA); recombinant murine interleukin-12 (IL12) (PeproTech); and 25 nm gold (Au) nanospheres (nanogold Aurion). Recombinant murine TNF and synthetic cyclic head-to-tail c(CGisoDGRG) peptide (called iso1) were prepared as described previously [20, 29]. Iso1-HSA conjugate, comprising iso1 chemically coupled to HSA via 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylic acid 3-sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester sodium salt (sulfo-SMCC) and SMCC-HSA (HSA activated with sulfo-SMCC and quenched with β-mercaptoethanol in place of iso1), were prepared as described previously [20].

Preparation of bifunctional gold nanoparticles bearing iso1 and IL12 or iso1 and TNF

Bifunctional gold Nps loaded with iso1 and IL12 (called iso1Au/IL12) or iso1 and TNF (iso1Au/TNF) were prepared, as described previously, by incubating 1 ml of 25-nm nanogold (A520nm, ~ 1 unit) with 0.1 ml of solution containing 120 µg of iso1-HSA and 2.7 µg of IL12 or 160 µg of iso1-HSA and 16 µg of TNF, respectively [21, 23] (see also Additional file 1: Scheme S1). Monofunctional Nps lacking iso1 (Au/TNF and Au/IL12) were prepared in the same manner, except that SMCC-HSA was used instead of iso1-HSA. Other monofunctional Nps lacking cytokines (iso1Au) were prepared in the same way by omitting the cytokine in the incubation mixture.

Preparation of trifunctional gold nanoparticles bearing iso1, IL12 and TNF

Trifunctional gold Nps loaded with iso1, IL-12, and TNF (called iso1Au/TNF + IL12) were prepared as follows: a solution containing 132 µg of iso1-HSA, 1 µg of TNF (19 pmol), 6 µg of IL12 (86 pmol, corresponding to TNF:IL12 molar ratio of 1:4.5), and 5 µg of PEG in 100 µl of 5 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0, was added to 1 ml of 25-nm nanogold (Aurion), with the pH adjusted to 4.3–4.4 with orthophosphoric acid (final pH ~ 5.5), and left to incubate for 2 h at room temperature under shaking. The product was mixed with 100 µl of 10% HSA in water (added in aliquots every 2 min) and incubated for an additional 5 min to saturate gold Nps. The final product was centrifuged (14,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C), resuspended in 1 ml of 1% HSA in 5 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0 (three times), filtered (0.22 µm pore size; Millex-GV Filter) and stored at − 80 °C (see also Additional file 1: Scheme S1). A similar product was prepared using a TNF:IL12 molar ratio of 4:1. Furthermore, Nps lacking iso1 (called Au/TNF + IL12) were prepared in the same manner, except that SMCC-HSA was used instead of iso1-HSA.

Physicochemical characterization of nanodrugs

Visible spectra of the nanodrugs were recorded using an UltroSpec 2100 spectrophotometer (Amersham Biosciences) and a 1-cm-path-length quartz cuvette. The concentration of Nps was calculated by interpolating the A530 nm values on a calibration curve obtained using uncoated nanogold in 5 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0 (stock solution: 3.3 × 1011 Nps/ml; A530 nm: 0.96 U/ml).

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were performed using a DLS DYNAPRO 99 instrument (Wyatt) operating with the laser intensity set to 20% power. The nanodrugs were diluted 1:10 in 5 mM sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0 (1–3 × 1010 Nps/ml) and analyzed using 25–30 independent measurements of 10-s duration at 20 °C. The calculation of the hydrodynamic radius of the Nps was performed using DLS regularization analysis.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis were performed using a TALOS L120C microscope (ThermoScientific) as described previously [23]. Morphometric analysis of nanoparticles shape and diameter was performed using the ImageJ software, essentially as previously reported [30].

αvβ3 integrin, anti-IL12 antibody and sTNF-R2 binding assays

The binding assay of nanodrugs to αvβ3, anti-IL12 antibodies or sTNF-R2 (Enbrel) spotted onto nitrocellulose filters (0.45 µm) was performed using a Bio-Dot apparatus (Bio-Rad) as described previously [20, 21, 23]. The αvβ3/anti-IL12 antibody and αvβ3/anti-TNF antibody sandwich assays were performed as described previously [21, 23]. Briefly, various amounts of nanodrugs diluted in binding buffer (25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 1 mM manganese chloride 1% w/v BSA) were added to microtiter plates coated with or without αvβ3 (0.5 µg/ml). The binding of nanodrugs was then detected using a biotinylated anti-IL12 antibody (anti-p40 subunit; mAb C17.8) or an anti-TNF polyclonal antibody, followed by streptavidin-peroxidase or goat anti-rat antibody-peroxidase conjugates, respectively. Bound peroxidase was detected by adding the o-phenylenediamine chromogenic substrate.

IL12- and PEG-ELISA

The amount of IL12 and PEG bound to gold Nps was quantified using the MAX Deluxe Set Mouse IL12 (p70) ELISA kit (Biolegend) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the Polyethylene Glycol Backbone ELISA Kit (Life Diagnostics, Inc.) as described previously [23].

In vitro IL12 and TNF bioassay

The amount of bioactive IL12 bound to gold Nps was determined using an in vitro bioassay based on IL12-induced release of IFNγ from murine splenocytes [23]. IFNγ was detected using the mouse IFN-γ DuoSet ELISA kit (R&D System). The amount of bioactive TNF bound to gold Nps was determined using an in vitro bioassay based on TNF-induced cytolysis of murine L–M fibroblasts, as described previously [29].

In vivo studies

Murine WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma cells (CRL-1751, ATCC) were cultured in DMEM with standard supplements and tested for mycoplasma contamination before their use in vivo using the MycoAlert assay Control Set (Lonza). BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories; 6–8 weeks old), weighing 18 to 20 g, were challenged by s.c. injection into the left flank with 106 WEHI-164 cells. Five days later, the mice were injected (i.v.) with nanodrugs in 0.9% sodium chloride containing 100 µg/ml of HSA, alone or in combination with 150 µg of doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Pfizer) in 0.9% sodium chloride. Tumor growth was monitored by measuring the tumor size with a caliper. The tumor volumes were estimated by calculating r1 × r2 × r3 × 4/3π, where r1 and r2 are the longitudinal and lateral radii, respectively, and r3 is the thickness of the tumor protruding from the surface of normal skin. Animals were sacrificed before the tumors reached a diameter of 1–1.5 cm. The tumor sizes are shown as the mean ± SE.

Results

Gold nanoparticles are loaded with iso1, TNF and/or IL12 to generate bi- or trifunctional nanodrugs

Iso1-coated gold Nps (iso1Au) bearing different amounts of TNF and IL12 (called iso1Au/TNF + IL12; trifunctional) were prepared by incubating 25-nm Au nanospheres with solutions containing TNF and IL12 in different molar ratios (1:4.5 or 4:1 molar ratio) and fixed amounts of iso1-albumin conjugate (iso1-HSA) and PEG (see “Methods”). Bifunctional (iso1Au/TNF, iso1Au/IL12, Au/TNF + IL12) and monofunctional (Au/TNF and Au/IL12) nanodrugs were also prepared by omitting one or two components, respectively, in the incubation mixtures. UV–visible spectrophotometric analysis of the mono-, bi-, and trifunctional products showed similar absorption spectra, as judged from the λmax absorption values, peak width at 75% height (PW75), and 650/530 nm ratio (Fig. 1a, Additional file 1: Figure S1, and Table 1). Furthermore, dynamic light scattering analysis of bifunctional and trifunctional products showed similar average diameters (approximately 43–44 nm) (Table 1), suggesting that these nanodrugs essentially consisted of monodispersed Nps. Accordingly, transmission electron microscopy showed that all nanodrugs were made of gold nanospheres with a maximal diameter of about 28 nm (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Thus, all nanodrugs had very similar physical properties.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterization of tri- and bifunctional nanodrugs by UV–Vis spectrophotometry and binding assays to αvβ3, sTNF-R2 and anti-IL12 antibodies. a UV–Vis absorption spectra of nanodrugs. The dotted line and solid line correspond to uncoated or coated 25-nm gold nanoparticles, respectively. The TNF:IL12 molar ratio used to prepare the trifunctional nanodrugs is indicated in parentheses. b Binding of different nanodrugs (iso1Au, Au/TNF, Au/IL12, iso1Au/IL12, iso1Au/TNF, and iso1Au/TNF + IL12) to αvβ3, soluble TNF receptor Type-II (sTNF-R2, Enbrel), and anti-IL12 antibody (mAb C15.6) adsorbed onto nitrocellulose filters, as detected by silver staining of gold nanoparticles. The iso1Au/TNF + IL12 used in this experiment was prepared using a TNF:IL12 molar ratio of 4:1. c Binding of nanodrugs to microtiter plates coated with or without αvβ3, as detected using a biotinylated antibody anti-IL12 (mAb C17.8) or with anti-TNF antibodies followed by HRP-labeled streptavidin or HRP-labeled secondary antibodies, respectively. Schematic representation of the assays (upper panels). The results of a representative experiment are shown (mean ± SE of duplicates). The TNF:IL12 molar ratio used to prepare the nanodrugs is indicated in parentheses

Full size image
Table 1 Characterization of mono-, bi-, and trifunctional nanodrugs by UV–visible spectroscopy (UV–Vis) and dynamic light scattering (DLS)
Full size table

To assess whether iso1, TNF and IL12 were indeed loaded on gold Nps, we measured the capability of all the products to bind αvβ3, sTNF-R2 and anti-IL12 antibodies. We first evaluated the capability of each nanodrug to bind nitrocellulose filters spotted with αvβ3, sTNF-R2 (Enbrel) or anti-IL12 mAb C15.6. Mono-, bi- and trifunctional nanoparticles recognized spots on nitrocellulose with patterns consistent with their expected functional properties (Fig. 1b). Next, we evaluated the capability of each nanodrug to form molecular sandwiches in two integrin-antibody sandwich assays based on (a) αvβ3 and anti-IL12 mAb C17.8 and (b) αvβ3 and polyclonal anti-TNF antibodies. As expected, bi- and trifunctional nanoparticles, but not monofunctional nanoparticles, formed molecular sandwiches with αvβ3 and relevant anti-IL12 or anti-TNF antibodies in the sandwich assays (Fig. 1c), suggesting that the different components of the bi- and trifunctional nanodrugs are accessible to multivalent heterotypic interactions.

Overall, these results indicate that the bi- and trifunctional nanodrugs were loaded with iso1-HSA, TNF and IL12, as hypothesized, and that iso1 and TNF preserved their receptor binding properties after coupling to nanogold. In other words, nanogold can be successfully loaded with iso1-HSA, TNF and/or IL12.

Assessment of the biological activity of IL12 and TNF loaded on gold nanoparticles

Next, we quantified the number of IL12 or TNF molecules loaded onto nanogold and assessed their biological activity. Regarding IL12, we measured the capability of iso1Au/IL12 and iso1Au/TNF + IL12 to bind anti-IL12 antibodies by sandwich IL12-ELISA (immunoassay) and to promote IFNγ release from cultured murine splenocytes (bioassay). Both assays were calibrated with IL12. The immunoreactivity of each bi- or trifunctional nanoparticle was equivalent to that of 5–19 molecules of IL12, depending on the preparation protocol (Table 2). In particular, iso1Au/IL12 showed 6.4 molecules of IL12/Np, whereas iso1Au/TNF + IL12 prepared with 4:1 and 1:4.5 molar ratios of TNF/IL12 showed 4.7 and 19.1 molecules/Np of IL12, respectively. Interestingly, when these drugs were tested using the IFNγ-release bioassay, their potency was equivalent to 47, 35 and 40 molecules/Np of IL12, respectively (Table 2). The apparent discrepancy between the immunoassay and bioassay may be due to a more efficient engagement of IL12 receptors by gold-bound IL12 compared with “free” IL12, owing to multivalent interactions of each nanoparticle with individual cells. Notably, the EC50 of the two iso1Au/TNF + IL12 preparations (4:1 and 1:4.5 molar ratios) in the IL12 bioassay corresponded to 4.8 × 106 and 4.2–4.8 × 106 Nps/ml, respectively, despite the different number of immunoreactive IL12 molecules/Np (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Considering that 200,000 cells/200 µl were seeded in each microtiter plate well, these EC50 values correspond to 4–5 Nps/cell. These data suggest that the binding of a few nanoparticles/splenocyte is sufficient to trigger IFNγ release.

Table 2 Quantification of TNF, IL12 and PEG molecules loaded on gold nanoparticles
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Biological effects of bi- and trifunctional nanodrugs on IFNγ production by splenocytes (a) and L–M cell viability (b). a Effect of nanodrugs and IL12 on IFNγ production by murine splenocytes. Murine splenocytes (200,000 cells in 200 µl of culture medium) were cultured in complete medium supplemented with 125 U/ml of IL-2 and variable amounts of nanodrugs or IL12 for 5 days. IFNγ production in pooled cell supernatants (prepared in quadruplicate) was determined by ELISA (in duplicate). One representative experiment is shown (mean ± SE). The cumulative data of 4–12 experiments are reported in Table 2. The TNF:IL12 ratio used to prepare the trifunctional nanodrug is indicated in parentheses. Arrows, effective concentration 50 (EC50). b Cytotoxic effects of nanodrugs and TNF on L–M cells. L–M cells (30,000 cells in 100 µl of culture medium) were cultured in complete medium supplemented with 2 µg/ml of actinomycin D and the indicated amounts of nanodrugs or TNF for 20 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cell viability was quantified using the PrestoBlue Cell Viability Reagent. One representative experiment is shown (mean ± SE, of triplicates). The cumulative data of 3–7 experiments are reported in Table 2

Full size image

To quantify the amount of bioactive TNF loaded onto iso1Au/TNF and iso1Au/TNF + IL12, we tested their cytotoxic effects against murine L–M fibroblasts using TNF as a reference standard. The potency of each iso1Au/TNF Np was equivalent to that of 6.8 TNF molecules, whereas that of iso1Au/TNF + IL12 Nps prepared with 4:1 and 1:4.5 molar ratios of TNF/IL12 was equivalent to 14.1 and 2.4 TNF molecules, respectively (Fig. 2b and Table 2).

Overall, these results establish the feasibility of the multifunctional cytokine nanoformulation based on gold Nps.

Iso1Au/TNF, iso1Au/IL12 and iso1Au/TNF + IL12 exert anti-tumor effects in a murine model of fibrosarcoma

We then analyzed the anti-tumor activity of bi- and trifunctional nanodrugs using immunocompetent mice bearing subcutaneous WEHI-164 fibrosarcomas. In previous studies, we found that iso1Au/TNF and iso1Au/IL12 exerted maximal anti-tumor activity when injected at doses corresponding to approximately 5–15 pg of TNF [20, 21] and 20–70 pg of IL12 [23], respectively. Thus, for in vivo studies, we used iso1Au/TNF + IL12 prepared using a TNF:IL12 molar ratio of 1:4.5, i.e., with less TNF than IL12 (2.4 and 19.1 molecules/Np, respectively). The administration of doses of iso1Au/TNF, iso1Au/IL12, or iso1Au/TNF + IL12 equivalent to approximately 10 pg of TNF or 70 pg of IL12 induced similar anti-tumor effects (Fig. 3, upper panels). Similar anti-tumor effects were also observed using three-fold higher doses (Fig. 3, lower panels). Notably, in previous studies, we have shown that comparable doses of TNF and IL12 were completely inactive in the same model [20, 21, 23]. These data indicate that the iso1Au nanoformulation of these cytokines increases their anticancer activity. Although no greater effects were observed with the trifunctional Nps in the WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma model, compared to bifunctional Nps, these data indicate that this nanodrug is biologically active in vivo.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Anti-tumor effects of bi- and trifunctional nanodrugs in the WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma model. Tumor-bearing mice were treated at the indicated times (arrows) after tumor implantation with the indicated doses of iso1Au/TNF (a), iso1Au/IL12 (b) or iso1Au/TNF + IL12 (c) (TNF:IL12 molar ratio, 1:4.5) (i.v.). The indicated doses correspond to immunoreactive IL12, as detected by ELISA, or bioactive TNF, as determined by the L–M cytolytic assay. The tumor volumes are shown (mean ± SE, 4–6 mice per group). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 by Mann–Whitney analysis of the area under the curve for each tumor with GraphPad Prism software

Full size image

Iso1Au/TNF and iso1Au/TNF + IL12, but not iso1Au/IL12, exert synergistic effects with doxorubicin in a murine model of fibrosarcoma

The capability of bifunctional and trifunctional nanodrugs to synergize with doxorubicin (Doxo) was investigated using the same tumor model. The administration of 150 µg of Doxo alone induced a significant delay in tumor growth (Fig. 4a upper panels, and Fig. 4b). This effect was significantly increased when combined with iso1Au/TNF or iso1Au/TNF + IL12 but not with iso1Au/IL12 (Fig. 4a upper panels, and Fig. 4b). None of the tested nanodrugs worsened Doxo-related toxicity, as judged by the animal weight loss (Fig. 4a, lower panels). These results indicate that both bi- and trifunctional Nps bearing TNF can increase the therapeutic index of Doxo.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of bi- and trifunctional nanodrugs alone or in combination with doxorubicin (Doxo). WEHI-164 tumor-bearing mice were treated (i.v.) at the indicated times after tumor implantation (arrows) with the indicated doses of iso1Au/TNF, iso1Au/IL12, iso1Au/TNF + IL12 and Doxo (150 µg). The indicated doses correspond to immunoreactive IL12, as detected by ELISA, or bioactive TNF, as determined by the L–M cytolytic assay. a Tumor volume (upper panels) and body weight changes (lower panels) (mean ± SE, 4–6 mice per group). b Kaplan–Meier curves of Doxo alone and in combination with iso1Au/TNF or iso1Au/TNF + IL12. The cumulative data of the two experiments performed with iso1Au/TNF + IL12 (a right panels) are reported. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test

Full size image

Iso1Au/TNF promotes doxorubicin penetration in tumor tissues and causes vascular damage at later time points

The mechanism underlying the anti-tumor activity of iso1Au/TNF and its synergism with Doxo was then investigated. Considering that TNF can increase tumor vascular permeability and reduce drug penetration barriers, we tested the hypothesis that this nanodrug increased Doxo penetration in tumors. To this aim, we exploited the fact that Doxo is a fluorescent compound and that the fluorescence intensity of the tumor cells recovered from animals after treatment indicates the amount of Doxo that penetrated tumors [3]. As expected, iso1Au/TNF increased the fluorescence intensity and the percentage of positive cells recovered from tumors 2 h after treatment (Fig. 5). Considering that TNF can also have vascular-damaging effects [31, 32], we then analyzed the impact of iso1Au/TNF on tumor perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound analysis with microbubbles (CEUS). A marked reduction in the signal/time area under the curve (AUC) and peak enhancement of microbubbles was observed 2–3 days after treatment (Fig. 6). This and the above findings suggest that iso1Au/TNF reduces drug penetration barriers in tumors at early time points, favoring drug extravasation, and causes vascular shutdown at later time points in some tumor areas. Both mechanisms, together with the anti-cancer effects of Doxo, may have contributed to the overall anti-tumor activity of the combined therapy.

Fig. 5
figure 5

iso1Au/TNF increases the tumor cell uptake of Doxo. WEHI-164 tumor-bearing mice (approximately 0.4–0.8 cm in tumor diameter) were treated i.v. with vehicle or the indicated dose of doxo alone or in combination with iso1Au/TNF. After 2 h, tumors were recovered, weighed, minced, and processed as described previously [3] to obtain a single-cell suspension, and analyzed by flow cytometry. a Representative flow cytometry analysis of WEHI-164 tumor cells recovered from mice treated as indicated. The M1 dotted line indicates the fluorescence interval considered positive. b Mean fluorescence intensity (left) and percentage of positive cells in the M1 area (right). Cumulative results of 2 independent experiments (mean ± SE, 2–3 mice/experiment). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, by two-tailed t-test

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Iso1Au/TNF reduces tumor perfusion. WEHI 164 tumor-bearing mice (n = 6/group) were treated i.v. with the indicated dose of iso1Au/TNF at day 6 after tumor implantation and were analyzed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) at day 8 (3 mice) and day 9 (3 mice). MicroMarker Contrast Agent was injected at time 0, and its uptake was recorded for 40 s. a Scheme of the experiment. b Effect of iso1Au/TNF (5 pg) or vehicle on tumor growth before and after treatment (day 1), as determined by calipers. c Time-intensity curves (mean ± SE); ****p < 0.0001, by two-way ANOVA. d Grayscale tumor images (left) and color-coded peak enhancement (PE) maps of representative mice. Red and blue areas correspond to high and low perfused tumor areas, respectively. Numbers, PE values. e Quantitative analysis of tumor perfusion with microbubbles performed using VevoCQTM software. CEUS parameters were calculated using a region of interest (ROI, green lines in d) corresponding to the entire tumor area. Box plots of CEUS parameters with 5–95 percentiles and medians are shown; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001 by two-tailed t-test. Images were taken at regions with a maximum tumor diameter. f Tumor weight at day 10

Full size image

Discussion

This work shows that gold nanospheres coated with the iso1 peptide can be used as a versatile platform for single- or multicytokine delivery to the tumor vasculature. In particular, the results of in vitro studies show that bi- or trifunctional nanodrugs consisting of nanogold coated with iso1, bioactive TNF and/or IL12 can be easily prepared by incubating 25-nm gold nanospheres with iso1-HSA, TNF and IL12 in different proportions. Notably, the results of in vitro bioassays show that the “nanoformulated” cytokines (IL12 and TNF) trigger biological effects more efficiently than the corresponding “free” cytokines. For example, 35- to 47-fold lower amounts of nanoformulated IL12, compared to IL12, were sufficient to evoke the secretion of IFNγ from murine splenocytes. This phenomenon was not related to iso1-mediated targeting mechanisms of nanoformulated cytokines, because iso1Au/IL12 and Au/IL12 showed similar potencies in this assay (data not shown). More likely, this phenomenon was related to high-avidity interactions engaged by multivalent nanoparticles with IL12 membrane receptors. Accordingly, enhanced effects have also been observed with TNF upon nanogold formulation.

The enhanced cytokine activity, together with peptide- and gold-mediated active and passive targeting mechanisms (which may occur in vivo), may contribute to reducing the dose of cytokines necessary for inducing pharmacological effects. According to this view, we found that extremely low, nontoxic doses of iso1Au/TNF or iso1Au/TNF + IL12, corresponding to 3–6 × 107 nanoparticles (equivalent to 5–10 pg of TNF), were sufficient to exert synergistic effects with doxorubicin in the WEHI-164 fibrosarcoma model. If we assume that approximately 1% of the injected dose accumulated in tumors, as typically observed with nanoparticles [33], we estimate that only 3–6 × 105 nanoparticles reached their target in tumors. Considering that 0.1- to 0.2-cm3 tumors may contain 1–2 × 107 cells [34], this number of nanoparticles is considerably lower than that of the neoplastic cells present in the tumors at the time of treatment. Endothelial cells, which represent a small fraction of the tumor mass (2–11%) [21, 35] and express the αvβ3 receptor of iso1 [36, 37], are likely the target of our nanodrugs. Thus, we estimate, from these figures, that the delivery of only 1–4 Nps/endothelial cells is sufficient to induce pharmacological effects. Analysis of doxorubicin uptake by tumor cells, performed 2 h after treatment with iso1Au/TNF, showed that this nanodrug enhanced the amount of doxorubicin that reached cancer cells, likely by increasing endothelial permeability and reducing drug penetration barriers. However, analysis of tumor perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound 2–3 days after treatment showed that iso1Au/TNF, despite its low dose, could also cause vascular shutdown in some tumor areas. Thus, while iso1Au/TNF can reduce doxorubicin penetration barriers at early time points, at later times this nanodrug may also further entrap doxorubicin in tumor tissues by impairing tumor perfusion. The combination of these time-dependent effects on the tumor vasculature may have contributed to the synergism observed with chemotherapy, resulting in a prolonged survival of mice.

In previous studies, we have shown that low doses of NGR-TNF, a peptide-TNF fusion protein that targets the tumor vasculature, are sufficient to cause the disassembly VE-cadherin dependent-adherence junctions and gap formation in the tumor endothelium, thereby increasing vascular permeability [38]. This compound can also enhance the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules on tumor endothelial cells and induce cytokine/chemokine secretion, thereby enhancing lymphocyte infiltration [39]. TNF can also induce endothelial cell apoptosis, vascular damage, intravascular coagulation and occlusion [40], leading to ischemic and hemorrhagic necrosis [41]. These mechanisms are likely triggered also by iso1Au/TNF, as suggested by the increased doxorubicin uptake, 2 h after treatment, and by the reduction of tumor perfusion at later time points.

Other investigators have shown previously that 27-nm nanogold functionalized with TNF (called CYT-6091) can suppress tumor perfusion and increase the antitumor effects of chemotherapy in murine models of mammary carcinoma and in genetically engineered mice with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, when administered at doses equivalent to 3–5 µg of bioactive TNF [42, 43]. Notably, our results show that markedly lower doses of iso1Au/TNF (equivalent to 5–10 pg of bioactive TNF) are sufficient to affect vascular permeability, tumor perfusion and antitumor efficacy of chemotherapy. The extremely low dose of iso1Au/TNF necessary to induce anti-tumor effects may represent an important advantage in terms of toxicity.

Iso1Au/TNF and iso1Au/TNF + IL12 showed similar anti-tumor effects in the murine fibrosarcoma model, when used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, suggesting that the addition of IL12 does not increase the anti-tumor effects of iso1Au/TNF in this model. The rationale for combining TNF and IL12 in a single nanodrug (iso1Au/TNF + IL12) relies on the notion that IL12 can induce the release of IFNγ from lymphoid cells, such as NK cells and T cells, a cytokine crucial for the activity of low-dose targeted TNF [26]. Furthermore, in previous studies, we showed that low-dose iso1Au/IL12 can significantly increase tumor infiltration by innate immune cells, such as NK and iNKT cells, monocytes, and neutrophils [23]. However, iso1Au/IL12 can also induce the release of sTNF-R2 in the tumor microenvironment, an inhibitor of TNF [23]. We speculate that this mechanism may have counterbalanced, to some extent, the potential synergism of these cytokines when combined in a single drug, such as in the case of iso1Au/TNF + IL12.

In any case, given that the addition of IL12 to iso1Au/TNF did not impair its synergism with chemotherapy in the WEHI fibrosarcoma model and considering our previous studies showing that iso1Au/IL12 and TNF can individually support the therapeutic efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy in other tumor models [23, 44], the trifunctional iso1Au/TNF + IL12 might exert synergistic effects with other chemo-immunotherapeutic combinations in different tumors, which is an approach that merits future investigation.

Conclusion

We have shown that isoDGR-coated gold nanospheres can be exploited as a versatile platform for single- or multicytokine delivery to cells of the tumor vasculature and that extremely low doses of isoDGR-coated nanoparticles functionalized with TNF or with TNF + IL12 can induce synergistic effects with doxorubicin. Furthermore, the present study establishes the conceptual feasibility of multifunctional cytokine nanoformulations using iso1-coated gold nanoparticles, a technology potentially applicable to other cytokines.

References

  1. Conlon KC, Miljkovic MD, Waldmann TA. Cytokines in the treatment of cancer. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2019;39(1):6–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Young PA, Morrison SL, Timmerman JM. Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins for treatment of cancer: engineering cytokines for improved efficacy and safety. Semin Oncol. 2014;41(5):623–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Curnis F, Sacchi A, Corti A. Improving chemotherapeutic drug penetration in tumors by vascular targeting and barrier alteration. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(4):475–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasche N, Neri D. Immunocytokines: a novel class of potent armed antibodies. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17(11–12):583–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kontermann RE. Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;526(2):194–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johansson A, Hamzah J, Payne CJ, Ganss R. Tumor-targeted TNFalpha stabilizes tumor vessels and enhances active immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(20):7841–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Corti A, Curnis F, Rossoni G, Marcucci F, Gregorc V. Peptide-mediated targeting of cytokines to tumor vasculature: the NGR-hTNF example. BioDrugs. 2013;27(6):591–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang B, Gao B, Dong S, Zhang Y, Wu Y. Anti-tumor efficacy and pre-clinical immunogenicity of IFNalpha2a-NGR. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011;60(1):73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Curnis F, Gasparri A, Sacchi A, Cattaneo A, Magni F, Corti A. Targeted delivery of IFNg to tumor vessels uncouples antitumor from counterregulatory mechanis. Cancer Res. 2005;65(7):2906–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma W, Li G, Wang J, Yang W, Zhang Y, Conti PS, et al. In vivo NIRF imaging-guided delivery of a novel NGR-VEGI fusion protein for targeting tumor vasculature. Amino Acids. 2014;46(12):2721–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorusso D, Scambia G, Amadio G, di Legge A, Pietragalla A, De Vincenzo R, et al. Phase II study of NGR-hTNF in combination with doxorubicin in relapsed ovarian cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;107(1):37–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gregorc V, Gaafar RM, Favaretto A, Grossi F, Jassem J, Polychronis A, et al. NGR-hTNF in combination with best investigator choice in previously treated malignant pleural mesothelioma (NGR015): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(6):799–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferreri AJM, Calimeri T, Conte GM, Cattaneo D, Fallanca F, Ponzoni M, et al. R-CHOP preceded by blood-brain barrier permeabilization with engineered tumor necrosis factor-alpha in primary CNS lymphoma. Blood. 2019;134(3):252–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferreri AJM, Calimeri T, Ponzoni M, Curnis F, Conte GM, Scarano E, et al. Improving the antitumor activity of R-CHOP with NGR-hTNF in primary CNS lymphoma: final results of a phase 2 trial. Blood Adv. 2020;4(15):3648–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Giljohann DA, Seferos DS, Daniel WL, Massich MD, Patel PC, Mirkin CA. Gold nanoparticles for biology and medicine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49(19):3280–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cai W, Gao T, Hong H, Sun J. Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2008;1:17–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Paciotti GF, Myer L, Weinreich D, Goia D, Pavel N, McLaughlin RE, et al. Colloidal gold: a novel nanoparticle vector for tumor directed drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2004;11(3):169–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Libutti SK, Paciotti GF, Byrnes AA, Alexander HR Jr, Gannon WE, Walker M, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic studies of CYT-6091, a novel PEGylated colloidal gold-rhTNF nanomedicine. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(24):6139–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Powell AC, Paciotti GF, Libutti SK. Colloidal gold: a novel nanoparticle for targeted cancer therapeutics. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;624:375–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Curnis F, Sacchi A, Longhi R, Colombo B, Gasparri A, Corti A. IsoDGR-tagged albumin: a new alphavbeta3 selective carrier for nanodrug delivery to tumors. Small. 2013;9(5):673–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Curnis F, Fiocchi M, Sacchi A, Gori A, Gasparri A, Corti A. NGR-tagged nano-gold: a new CD13-selective carrier for cytokine delivery to tumors. Nano Res. 2016;9(5):1393–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Corti A, Gasparri AM, Ghitti M, Sacchi A, Sudati F, Fiocchi M, et al. Glycine N-methylation in NGR-tagged nanocarriers prevents isoaspartate formation and integrin binding without impairing CD13 recognition and tumor homing. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(36):1701245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gasparri AM, Sacchi A, Basso V, Cortesi F, Freschi M, Rrapaj E, et al. Boosting interleukin-12 antitumor activity and synergism with immunotherapy by targeted delivery with isoDGR-tagged nanogold. Small. 2019;15(45):e1903462.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12: a proinflammatory cytokine with immunoregulatory functions that bridge innate resistance and antigen-specific adaptive immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1995;13:251–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Herpen CM, van der Voort R, van der Laak JA, Klasen IS, de Graaf AO, van Kempen LC, et al. Intratumoral rhIL-12 administration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients induces B cell activation. Int J Cancer. 2008;123(10):2354–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sacchi A, Gasparri A, Curnis F, Bellone M, Corti A. Crucial role for interferon-gamma in the synergism between tumor vasculature-targeted tumor necrosis factor alpha (NGR-TNF) and doxorubicin. Cancer Res. 2004;64(19):7150–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brooks PC, Stromblad S, Klemke R, Visscher D, Sarkar FH, Cheresh DA. Antiintegrin alpha v beta 3 blocks human breast cancer growth and angiogenesis in human skin. J Clin Invest. 1995;96(4):1815–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Avraamides CJ, Garmy-Susini B, Varner JA. Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(8):604–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Curnis F, Corti A. Production and characterization of recombinant human and murine TNF. Methods Mol Med. 2004;98:9–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rice SB, Chan C, Brown SC, Eschbach P, Han L, Ensor DS, et al. Particle size distributions by transmission electron microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison case study. Metrologia. 2013;50(6):663–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lejeune F, Lienard D, Eggermont A. Regional administration of recombinant tumour necrosis factor-alpha in cancer, with special reference to melanoma. BioDrugs. 1998;9(3):211–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lejeune FJ, Lienard D, Matter M, Ruegg C. Efficiency of recombinant human TNF in human cancer therapy. Cancer Immun. 2006;6:6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilhelm S, Tavares AJ, Dai Q, Ohta S, Audet J, Dvorak HF, et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:16014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Del Monte U. Does the cell number 10(9) still really fit one gram of tumor tissue? Cell Cycle. 2009;8(3):505–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Baeten CI, Wagstaff J, Verhoeven IC, Hillen HF, Griffioen AW. Flow cytometric quantification of tumour endothelial cells; an objective alternative for microvessel density assessment. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(3):344–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Alghisi GC, Ruegg C. Vascular integrins in tumor angiogenesis: mediators and therapeutic targets. Endothelium. 2006;13(2):113–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Friedlander M, Brooks PC, Shaffer RW, Kincaid CM, Varner JA, Cheresh DA. Definition of two angiogenic pathways by distinct alpha v integrins. Science. 1995;270(5241):1500–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dondossola E, Gasparri AM, Colombo B, Sacchi A, Curnis F, Corti A. Chromogranin A restricts drug penetration and limits the ability of NGR-TNF to enhance chemotherapeutic efficacy. Cancer Res. 2011;71(17):5881–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Calcinotto A, Grioni M, Jachetti E, Curnis F, Mondino A, Parmiani G, et al. Targeting TNF-alpha to neoangiogenic vessels enhances lymphocyte infiltration in tumors and increases the therapeutic potential of immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2012;188(6):2687–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nawroth P, Handley D, Matsueda G, De Waal R, Gerlach H, Blohm D, et al. Tumor necrosis factor/cachectin-induced intravascular fibrin formation in meth A fibrosarcomas. J Exp Med. 1988;168(2):637–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. North RJ, Havell EA. The antitumor function of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) II. Analysis of the role of endogenous TNF in endotoxin-induced hemorrhagic necrosis and regression of an established sarcoma. J Exp Med. 1988;167(3):1086–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Visaria RK, Griffin RJ, Williams BW, Ebbini ES, Paciotti GF, Song CW, et al. Enhancement of tumor thermal therapy using gold nanoparticle-assisted tumor necrosis factor-alpha delivery. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(4):1014–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Libutti SK, Tamarkin L, Nilubol N. Targeting the invincible barrier for drug delivery in solid cancers: interstitial fluid pressure. Oncotarget. 2018;9(87):35723–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Manzo T, Sturmheit T, Basso V, Petrozziello E, Hess Michelini R, Riba M, et al. T cells redirected to a minor histocompatibility antigen instruct intratumoral TNFalpha expression and empower adoptive cell therapy for solid tumors. Cancer Res. 2017;77(3):658–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Laura Perani, of the Preclinical Imaging Facility (Experimental Imaging Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute) for CEUS analysis, and Dr. Maria Carla Panzeri (Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy BioImaging Center, ALEMBIC, San Raffaele Scientific Institute) for TEM analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC, grant IG-23470, P.I. A Corti), Fondazione AIRC 5 per Mille 2019 (ID 22737 program, P.I. MC Bonini, Group Leader A Corti) and by Ministero della Salute of Italy (RF-2011-02350836 to AC, and RF-2016-02361054 to FC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tumor Biology and Vascular Targeting Unit, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Angelo Corti, Angelina Sacchi, Anna Maria Gasparri, Barbara Colombo & Flavio Curnis

  2. Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

    Angelo Corti, Matteo Monieri & Giulia Anderluzzi

  3. Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche, C.N.R., Via Mario Bianco 9, 20131, Milan, Italy

    Alessandro Gori

  4. Lymphocyte Activation Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

    Anna Mondino

Authors
  1. Angelo Corti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angelina Sacchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Maria Gasparri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matteo Monieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giulia Anderluzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Barbara Colombo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alessandro Gori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anna Mondino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Flavio Curnis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: AC and FC. Investigation: AMG, AS, AG, FC, AC. Data curation: AMG, AS, BC, GA, MM, AG. Formal analysis: AMG, AS, FC, AC. Writing—original draft: AC, FC, AM. Resources: AMG, AS, BC, AG. Supervision: AC and FC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Angelo Corti or Flavio Curnis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the procedures on mice were approved by the San Raffaele Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, according to institutional guidelines, and in compliance with national (D.L. N.26, 04/03/2014) and international law and policies (new directive 2010/63/EU). Special attention was given to animal welfare and to minimize animal numbers and suffering.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AC and FC are inventors of a patent regarding iso1Au/IL12 and iso1Au/TNF.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Scheme S1.

Schematic representation of the protocol used for preparation of iso1Au/TNF (A) iso1Au/IL12 (B) and iso1Au/TNF + IL12 (C). Figure S1. UV–Vis absorption spectra of Au/IL12, Au/TNF and Au/TNF + IL12. Figure S2. Characterization of iso1Au/TNF, iso1Au/IL12 and iso1Au/TNF + IL12 by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corti, A., Sacchi, A., Gasparri, A.M. et al. Enhancement of doxorubicin anti-cancer activity by vascular targeting using IsoDGR/cytokine-coated nanogold. J Nanobiotechnol 19, 128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00871-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-00871-y

Keywords

Journal of Nanobiotechnology

ISSN: 1477-3155

Contact us