Skip to main content

Stimuli-responsive DNA-based hydrogels for biosensing applications

Abstract

The base sequences of DNA are endowed with the rich structural and functional information and are available for the precise construction of the 2D and 3D macro products. The hydrogels formed by DNA are biocompatible, stable, tunable and biologically versatile, thus, these have a wide range of promising applications in bioanalysis and biomedicine. In particular, the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels (smart DNA hydrogels), which exhibit a reversible and switchable hydrogel to sol transition under different triggers, have emerged as smart materials for sensing. Thus far, the combination of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels and multiple sensing platforms is considered as biocompatible and is useful as the flexible recognition components. A review of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels and their biosensing applications has been presented in this study. The synthesis methods to prepare the DNA hydrogels have been introduced. Subsequently, the current status of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels in biosensing has been described. The analytical mechanisms are further elaborated by the combination of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels with the optical, electrochemical, point-of-care testing (POCT) and other detection platforms. In addition, the prospects of the application of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels in biosensing are presented.

Graphical abstract

Introduction

DNA has existed in nature for billions of years, and the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA by Watson and Crick in 1953 ushered in the possibilities for understanding and application of DNA at the molecular level [1]. In recent years, the advances in the DNA synthesis technology have facilitated its use as a functional material in chemistry [2], physics [3], computer science [4, 5] and medicine [6]. Due to its stability, flexibility, precise programmability, ease of synthesis and modification, etc., DNA can be accurately manipulated to generate various DNA building blocks with unique geometric structures, thus, resulting in the highly predictable and structured DNA networks [7,8,9,10,11]. In addition, the functional DNA structures can also undergo the conformational transformations in response to the external stimuli, such as the assembly of the guanine (G)-rich strands into G-quadruplexes on K+ stimulation, which further promotes them as the functional building blocks for the construction of the responsive materials [12].

The hydrogels prepared by chemical bonding among the DNA molecules or physical entanglement among the DNA strands are the biocompatible polymeric network materials which can absorb a large amount of water, thus, causing them to swell to hundreds of times the dry weight of the gel [13]. Of significant interest are the stimulus-responsive DNA hydrogels or smart DNA hydrogels. In the presence of the external triggers, such as pH [14,15,16,17,18,19], light [20], temperature [21,22,23], ionic strength [24,25,26], electric field strength [27], ultrasonic radiation [28] and magnetic stimulation [29, 30], the responsive DNA hydrogels are stimulated to undergo changes in crosslinking density at the microscopic level. This ensues the reversible and switchable hydrogel-to-sol or hydrogel-to-solid transitions at the macroscopic scale, which makes the hydrogels highly promising for drug delivery [31,32,33,34,35,36], controlled release [37,38,39,40,41], tissue engineering [42,43,44] and sensing applications [45,46,47]. Especially in the field of sensing, the DNA hydrogels combined with the diverse sensing platforms react with the metal ions [48, 49], nucleic acids [50,51,52,53,54], proteins [55, 56] and carcinogens [57], thereby converting them as changes in DNA hydrogel material properties, allowing the sensitive and specific target detection [58, 59]. Therefore, the DNA hydrogels are the functional platforms to detect a wide range of stimuli under different conditions.

Based on their components, DNA hydrogels can be divided into two groups, hybridized and pure DNA hydrogels. The hybridized hydrogels are formed by cross-linking the DNA molecules grafted on the hydrophilic polymer chains as interaction nodes, which was originally proposed by Nagahara and Matsuda [60]. The authors grafted single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) onto the polyacrylamide chains and subsequently formed the DNA hydrogels based on the base complementary pairing cross-linking between ATs. Using the similar strategy, the DNA-polyacrylamide chains have been used to construct various functional hydrogels, which have been applied in many fields, especially in the stimulus-responsive systems. In contrast, the pure DNA hydrogels are entirely made of the DNA molecules. These are generally assembled by enzymatic ligation, polymerization, hybridization, and specific binding of the DNA motifs as building blocks. In comparison with the hybridized hydrogels, the pure DNA hydrogels are more biocompatible, biodegradable, and easily moldable into the desired shapes and sizes. The preparation of the DNA hydrogels via nucleic acid amplification leads to the cost-effective synthesis and further expands the practical applications of the pure DNA hydrogels.

In this review, the different approaches to construct the DNA hydrogels have been presented. Subsequently, using selected examples, the specific applications and recent advances of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels in the field of biosensing have been explored. Based on the above facts, this review also provides insights into the prevailing challenges and future prospects of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels with an aim to promote the further development of the DNA hydrogels, especially in the field of biosensing.

Strategies to fabricate DNA hydrogels

Pure DNA hydrogels

The pure DNA hydrogels were first reported in 2006 [35]. Luo and colleagues designed three types of branched DNA monomers, namely X-DNA, Y-DNA, and T-DNA, with each sticky end of the monomers designed as palindromic sequences for hybridization and ligation by T4 ligase, in which the DNA monomers act as both cross-linking agents and cross-linking substrates. The properties of the hydrogel can be tuned by changing the concentration and type of initial DNA monomer to meet the needs of different applications. In addition to branching motifs alone, each type of branching motif can be hybridized with DNA linker double-stranded units. Liu et al. used double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) as a linker strand to ligate Y-monomers A and B to form a DNA hydrogel [61]. As shown in Fig. 1A, Y-monomer A (YMA) has three sticky ends for incorporation into deoxyribonucleases, Y-monomer B (YMB) has one sticky end for incorporation into the aptamer structure, and the linker chain has two sticky ends for incorporation into antisense oligonucleotides. The introduction of disulfide bonds allows the monomer and linker chains to remain stable in the blood circulation and to be cleaved by the reducing agent glutathione (GSH) upon reaching the targeted region, thus carrying out the release of the therapeutic gene or the loaded drug. Alternatively, without using branching motifs, separate linear dsDNA can be self-assembled as building blocks to form DNA hydrogels by rational design of the sticky ends [62]. Since DNA hydrogels are not covalently linked (by adding ligase to achieve this), they have temperature-responsive properties.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Examples of pure DNA hydrogels. A Schematic diagram of branched Y-shaped monomers (YMA and YMB) and linker that hybridize with their “sticky end” segments (black lines) to form nanohydrogel. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [61]. B Schematic diagram of the operation of the catalytic RCA hydrogel. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [65]. C When removing water, the hydrogels act as liquid and adapt to different containers. When reintroducing water, solid-like metaproperties of hydrogels occur. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [8]

Owing to the inevitable accumulated errors associated with DNA self-assembly at high concentrations and cost constraints, the preparation of the pure DNA hydrogels by means of nucleic acid amplification has gained significant attention [8], mainly including hybridization chain reaction (HCR) [63], rolling circle amplification (RCA) [64] and multi-primed chain amplification (MCA). RCA represents a thermostatic amplification method. Using circular DNA as a template, dNTPs are ligated into long ssDNA by the DNA primers complementary to a portion of the circular template in the presence of polymerase, with the product containing the hundreds or thousands of repeats of the DNA fragment complementary to the template. Tian et al. developed an RCA method for an automated production of the DNA hydrogels and successfully used it to detect glucose [65]. As shown in Fig. 1B, long ssDNA with multiple repeats of the G-rich sequences is amplified by using a cyclic cytosine-rich DNA template. By the rational design of the template sequence, the resulting RCA product possesses an intermolecular four-stranded conformation, which provides a sufficient crosslinking force for hydrogel formation. The hydrogels exhibit a highly stable horseradish peroxidase-like (HRP) catalytic activity and can be maintained under harsh storage conditions for long term. This makes it promising for various applications in colorimetric analysis. Subsequently, the authors further designed three RCA templates to periodically align the I-motif-sequence forming sequences (IFSs) on the polymeric DNA strands by using the RCA method [66]. The generated RCA products are noted to readily form the intermolecular I-motif sequence structures between the DNA strands and are more likely to form the stable hydrogels in acidic environments, thus, opening the opportunities for the pH-stimulated drug release. Exceptionally, other studies have reported the combination of RCA and MCA amplification to prepare the DNA hydrogel metamaterials (termed as biased hydrogels) with unique mechanical properties [8]. As observed from Fig. 1C, the hydrogel possesses the liquid-like properties after removal from water and can adapt to the containers of different shapes. On the other hand, it exhibits the solid-like properties in water. Moreover, irrespective of the shape change, the hydrogel is noted to rapidly return to its original shape on adding water. The developed hydrogel with meta-properties exhibits high potential of use for drug release, cell therapy, electronic switches and flexible circuits.

Hybrid DNA hydrogels

Although pure DNA hydrogels show some unique properties, there are still limitations. Intrinsic properties of DNA dictate high synthesis costs and a highly negative net charge, in addition to the few functionalities available in the DNA molecule, limiting further modifications and reducing versatility [67]. As a result, more and more researchers are turning to hybridized DNA hydrogels. Specifically, this class of DNA hydrogel is a gel material not composed entirely of DNA, it can refer to the binding of the DNA strands to different polymers and/or nanoparticles (plasmonic nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles and carbonaceous nanoparticles, etc.). The scope of the bio-responsive hybridized DNA hydrogels has been significantly expanded due to the introduction of the diverse functional groups, thus, providing additional molecular recognition capabilities and versatility. And the results of the comparison of the two different types of DNA hydrogels are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Comparison of the performance of typical DNA hydrogels

Polymer-grafted DNA hydrogels

The hybridized DNA hydrogels were first reported in 1996, and the DNA-polyacrylamide chain copolymer employed in the study has become one of the most established building blocks since then [60, 68,69,70]. Chiefly, two representative DNA hydrogels are prepared, one of them is formed by grafting two complementary DNA strands onto polyacrylamide strands separately and cross-linking them by base pairing. The other is the introduction of a linker chain, which is complementary to the modified DNA on each of the two linear strands, thereby crosslinking them to form DNA hydrogels.

In addition to the initially used double-stranded nucleic acids as crosslinking units, a rich “tool-box” of the structural motifs (I-motifs, G-tetramers, T-A·T/C-G·C triplets, C-Ag+-C, trans-azobenzene/β-cyclodextrin supramolecular complexes, glucosamine-boronic acid esters, etc.) has been proposed for crosslinking [71,72,73,74,75,76]. These motifs can not only crosslink individually to form the DNA hydrogels, but can also be synergistically cross-linked in different combinations, thereby imparting the dual/multi-trigger functionality and controlled rigidity to the hydrogels, resulting in a broad versatility [77].

Typically, in 2019, a novel hybrid DNA hydrogel was prepared by synergistically cross-linking an aminoglucose-borate (I) with a stimulus-responsive nucleic acid unit (II) [78]. As shown in Fig. 2A, based on the low-rigidity hydrogel formed by the cross-linked I chains, K+/crown ether allows the formation/dissociation of II so that the hydrogel cycles between high/low rigidity. Wherein, the I-strand provides an internal permanent memory and the external stimuli represented by K+/crown ether form a DNA gear that enables shape memory and self-healing functions. Similarly, the G-quadruplex can be replaced with other cross-linked units in the tool-box. As shown in Fig. 2B, the synergistic crosslinking unit is a double-stranded nucleic acid bridge stabilized by trans-azobenzene. It can be isomerized to the cis under 365 nm excitation light, while returning to the trans state under > 420 nm excitation, realizing the photoisomerization switch. Compared to the traditional absolute 0-1 switching of hydrogels under a single trigger, the presence of a quasi-liquid state (0.5) provides a temporary shape (storage), and the orthogonal trigger function gives it more possibilities in developing stimulus-responsive “actuators”.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic representation of the synthesis of hybrid DNA hydrogel. A Polyacrylamide DNA hydrogels of glucosamine-boronate eaters and G-quadruplexes synergistically cross-linked in the presence of K+/crown ethers undergoing cyclic hydrogel-solution transition. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [78]. B Shape-memory hydrogel crosslinked by glucosamine-boronate eaters and trans-azobenzene stabilized duplex. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [78]. C Reversible transformation of pNIPAM hydrogels with C-Ag+-C bridging and the corresponding images (D). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [79]. E The fabrication of DNA hydrogel cross-linked by covalent conjugation of DNA with fluorescent CD to accommodate PpIX as a photosensitizer for A-PDT applications. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [97]

In addition to polyacrylamide, different polymer backbones have been continuously explored, bringing different stimulus-responsive properties. A relatively typical one is the temperature-responsive DNA poly-N-isopropylacrylamide (pNIPAM) based hydrogel [79]. It exhibits a reversible gel-to-solid transition occurs at approximately 32 °C [80]. While the incorporation of metal ions (e.g., Cu2+, Hg2+, Ag+, etc.) or photoisomerization groups tethered to the polymer can alter the gel-to-solid transition temperature of the cross-linked polymer [81, 82]. In 2014, Guo et al. developed a dual-trigger thermally responsive DNA hydrogel using pH or metal ions/ligands as co-triggers for the polymer phase transition [79]. This is exemplified in Fig. 2C. Under the stabilization of C-Ag+-C complexes, dsDNA bridges NIPAM to form DNA hydrogels (G′ = 85 Pa, G′′ = 4 Pa). Whereas, after the presence of cysteamine eliminates the effect of Ag+, the hydrogel reverses to dissolve into a liquid. Heating the triangular DNA hydrogel formed in the Teflon mold to 45 °C yields a compressed triangular structure that expands back to the hydrogel state upon cooling. Notably, the solid structures heated to 45 °C do not dissociate into solution under the influence of cysteamine (Fig. 2D). Likewise, DNA hydrogels formed by cross-linking DNA using C-rich sequence oligonucleotide tether strands under acidification conditions (pH = 5.2) degrade to liquid after neutralization (pH = 7.2) and undergo a reversible solid-hydrogel transition when treated at 45 °C and 25 °C.

DNA hydrogels based on other hybrids

In addition to the polymeric backbones, a few research studies have also introduced components such as nanoparticles [83,84,85,86], proteins [87], quantum dots (QDs) [88], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [89, 90], metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [91, 92], silver nanoclusters [93], graphene [94, 95] and magnetic materials [96] in the pure DNA hydrogels in order to confer the hybrid hydrogels additional functionality and versatility. In 2019, Sonam Kumari and coworkers reported a novel smart DNA hydrogel [97]. As shown in Fig. 2E, carbon dots (CDs) and protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) are attached to the ends of ssDNA strands through covalent bonds, respectively, and the coupled DNA forms DNA hydrogels by forming I-motif structure. I-motif structure can respond to pH for gel-sol transition. And the unique photophysical properties of CD and PpIX allow tracking of the release of loaded PpIX and degradation of the hydrogel. Recently, Yang’s group used DNA hydrogels formed by physical entanglement after RCA reaction as a binding scaffold for silver nanoclusters to obtain multifunctional hybrid hydrogels [93]. The unique mechanical properties of DNA hydrogels formed by this polymerization method (relayed RCA) make it injectable. And the presence of silver nanoclusters gives DNA hydrogels excellent fluorescence properties and strong antibacterial activity, facilitating their application in biomedical fields such as tissue engineering, wound dressing, biosensing and bioimaging. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) exhibit strong near-infrared light absorption, ultra-high electrical and thermal conductivity. Based on this, Nikhita D. Mansukhani and colleagues combined them with DNA to form hybrid DNA hydrogels [89]. The modulation of the DNA hydrogels mechanical properties was achieved by varying the ratio of SWCNTs to DNA, and the formed DNA hydrogels are also photo-reversible and thermally reversible, which can be triggered by temperature changes or near-infrared radiation. The hydrogels have a wide range of promising applications including substrate corresponding materials, sensing and 3D printing. In particular, Li and his colleagues reported the preparation of double-network hybrid hydrogels by a simple “one-pot” mixing method [98]. The hydrogels consist of networks formed by two hydrogel systems interpenetrating each other, one using DNA hybridization and the other using host-guest interactions of cucurbit [8] uril (CB [8]). The interpenetration of the well homogeneous network leads to a nonlinear increase in mechanical strength and crack resistance. In addition, the hydrogels are fully biodegradable, consisting of nuclease degradation of the DNA network and cellulase cleavage of the CB [8] network. Based on these excellent properties, this supramolecular hydrogel network can be used as a novel soft material scaffold for dynamic surface coating, controlled release and tissue engineering applications.

DNA hydrogels for biosensing applications

The response of the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels to external stimuli is widely used in many fields, especially in biosensing [95]. The biosensors are the unique sensing devices that convert the biological substances into acoustic, optical and electrical signals for detection. The incorporation of DNA in the hydrogel biosensors introduces additional interfaces, thus, DNA acts both as a cross-linking unit and as a recognition element. The specific recognition of the analyte triggers a change in the mechanical properties of the hydrogel matrix, which can be further converted into a signal suitable for detection. In the following section, the specific applications of the DNA hydrogels in biosensing have been discussed with respect to the different output signals, such as optical, electrochemical, point-of-care testing (POCT) etc. These applications are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Stimuli-based DNA hydrogels based biosensing strategies

DNA hydrogels in optical biosensing

DNA hydrogels in photoluminescent biosensing

Generally, there are two mechanisms for constructing DNA hydrogel-based fluorescent sensors. The first type is the modification or encapsulation of fluorophores (SYBR Green or other fluorescent indicators) in DNA hydrogels, and the second type is based on the “ON/OFF” mechanism of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), where bursts occur during assembly due to proximity and alteration upon recognition of a specific event.

In 2019, Li et al. reported a DNA hydrogel fluorescence detection platform constructed by using DNA Walker and HCR amplification [99]. As shown in Fig. 3A, DNA Walker amplifies a large number of single-stranded S3 in the presence of target miRNAs, and after base sequence design, S3 can bind to hairpin DNA (H2 and H3) sequences to trigger HCR amplification and form DNA cross-linked hydrogels. Extensive multi-branched dsDNA generated during amplification offers the opportunity to load SYBR Green I dye and CdTe QDs, resulting in a markedly amplified fluorescent signal and obtaining a 10–4 fM level of detection limit in the detection of human prostate cancer miR-141. After that, Kunfu Pi et al. constructed a green fluorescent hydrogel sensor and applied it in practice [100]. The authors take advantage of the selective binding of Hg2+ to thymine, the formed T-Hg2+-T crosslinker can bind SYBR Green I dye. After performance optimization the monitoring of Hg2+ in water (even in complex freshwater environments such as the Lawrence Great Lakes) was achieved. In 2020, Wu and coworkers were the first to integrate competitive binding patterns of aptamers, complementary sequences and targets into RCA self-assembled DNA hydrogels to construct DNA hydrogel-based fluorescent sensors that can be used for food safety monitoring sensitively [101]. The presence of the target dissociates the primers for the RCA reaction, and the released primers hybridizes with padlock probes to form a circular template, which is amplified with the assistance of polymerase, ligase, and Cy3-dNTPs to form a fluorescent DNA hydrogel. The fluorescence intensity is positively correlated with the concentration of the target and has excellent specificity and stability.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic illustration of stimuli-responsive hydrogel-based photoluminescent biosensing strategies. A Fabrication of the DNA hydrogel fluorescence platform for detection of target miRNA. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [99]. B Schematic diagram of the QD-DNA hydrogel based on FRET detection of DNA. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [104]

In addition to modifying the fluorophores on the cross-linked strands, the three-dimensional porous structure of the DNA hydrogel allows for the encapsulation of the fluorophore with no additional modification steps. Xiang et al. used X-DNA as the building block, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) as the “glue” and dATPs/dTTPs as the ingredients to extend and hybridize to form DNA hydrogels [102]. Prior incorporation of green fluorescent protein allows it to be encapsulated into the matrix and its release kinetics are monitored within 10 h after the addition of DNA endonuclease I (DNase I) for cleavage of DNA hydrogels.

Besides fluorescent indicators, Xu et al. reported a label-free DNA hydrogel fluorescent sensor with FRET signal output, enabling the detection of avian influenza virus H5N1 [103]. The authors label the QDs and quenchers on the complementary aptamer and single chain, respectively, and the fluorescence of the QDs is burst due to the proximity during cross-linking. In the presence of the target, the aptamer dissociates, the fluorescence donor-acceptor distance increases, and fluorescence is restored. The constructed method can achieve the detection of the target within 30 min and has potential for application in on-site detection. In 2021, Cheol Am Hong et al. constructed an enzyme-free DNA hydrogel based on the FRET mechanism to achieve rapid (1 h) and highly sensitive (fM level) detection of target DNA [104]. As shown in Fig. 3B, three individual hairpin DNAs (HD1, HD2, HD3) are designed with the 3′ end of each hairpin labeled with the quenchers BHQ-2. In the presence of the target DNA, the hairpin successively opened and eventually a Y-nanostructure (fluorescent burst) is obtained. The released target DNA can repeatedly open another HD1 and catalyze the loop-opening cycle, producing a large amount of Y-DNA with no need for enzymatic catalysis. In this regard, Y-DNA can be assembled with QD functionalized with complementary ssDNA to form QD-DNA hydrogel, and FRET is in “ON” state, thus reducing the fluorescence intensity. In the absence of target DNA, there is no effect on FRET and it is in the “OFF” state. The constructed method can provide an alternative method for the detection of short DNA sequences with low abundance.

The DNA hydrogel-based fluorescence detection method is easy to operate, the detection limit is satisfactory, and the reliability of the assay will be greatly improved if the background noise can be effectively reduced.

Application of DNA hydrogels in colorimetric biosensing

The colorimetric assay has many strengths such as simplicity of operation, cost-effectiveness, fast response time, and the fact that the signal can be output by a simple portable spectrometer or image processing software, even with the naked eye [105]. DNA hydrogels, due to its optical transparency, allow for the standard staining and labeling to perform colorimetric analytical assays, therefore, many efforts have been made in the development of colorimetric sensors.

The extinction coefficient of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) at visible wavelengths (~ 520 nm) is very large, which makes them a sensitive indicator for visual detection [106]. The DNA hydrogels allow modification of DNA and thiol-modified DNA can bind to AuNPs by thiol-gold interaction, based on which Ajfan Baeissa prepared DNA functionalized monolithic hydrogels [107]. As shown in Fig. 4A, DNA (I) is modified on an acrylamide strand and another DNA (II) containing a 3′-thiol modification that can be ligated to AuNPs. In the presence of the target DNA (III), I and II can be linked, thus attaching AuNPs to the surface of the gel and thus allowing visual detection without any instrumentation. Additionally, the high loading of DNA hydrogels encapsulating AuNPs can be used for detection. DNA hydrogels can physically isolate the AuNPs from the solution and un-isolate it after the stimulus response. Undoubtedly, the high loading and stimulus response characteristics bring about an increase in sensitivity and specificity. In 2018, Ma and colleagues encapsulated AuNPs in aptamer cross-linked hydrogels for colorimetric detection of glucose [108]. The aptamer as a cross-linked chain recognizes the glucose complex and dissociates from the complementary single chain, causing the hydrogel to disintegrate and releasing the encapsulant for visual colorimetric detection. Combining aptamer cross-linked hydrogels and smart materials, Yin et al. developed a chemical stimulus-controlled colorimetric logic gate system (“AND” and “OR”) [109]. Notably, in the “AND” logic gate (Fig. 4B), the DNA hydrogel is cross-linked in the form of a “Y” structure with two aptamers cross-linked to the linker chain, with each strand containing two semi-complementary structural domains of the other two strands. The addition of less than or equal to one target don’t disable the linkage structure, and only when two targets are present at the same time, the Y-type structure dissociates and cannot maintain the hydrogel stability and releases AuNPs for colorimetric detection. This method is expected to provide a universal detection platform for polymeric logic gates by simply designing functional nucleic acids for programming. In addition to the difference in color intensity produced by the change in AuNPs concentration, Mao et al. used DNA hydrogel-coated gold nanorods to achieve color chromaticity change as the output signal for the detection [110]. Since gold nanorods have different colors at different aspect ratios, reactive radicals generated by different concentrations of the target can etch them, thus changing the aspect ratio and enabling visual detection.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Examples of stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogel-based colorimetric detection. A Preparation of DNA-functionalized monolithic hydrogels and AuNPs as color indicator. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [107]. B Fabrication of AND logic gate for cocaine and ATP detection. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [109]. C Enzyme trapped hydrogel for signal amplification and visual detection. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [46]

Encapsulating colored substances in DNA hydrogel for direct detection based on stimulus-responsiveness, which is simple and fast. However, the sensitivity and quantification issues still limit its application. To address this issue, enzymes and other bioactive materials are usually introduced [111]. Due to the inherent biocompatibility, programmability, and high loading capacity of DNA hydrogels, they are ideal scaffolding materials for a variety of chromogenic reaction substrates.

In 2009, Zhu et al. first combined a DNA hydrogel with an amylose-I2-amylase system for the visual detection of cocaine [46]. As Fig. 4C, the DNA hydrogel is coated with amylase, and then the amylose is mixed with a small amount of iodine solution, at which time the color is dark blue. After adding the target cocaine to the reaction system, the aptamer as a cross-linker can combine with cocaine and release amylase, which can catalyze the decomposition of amylose into sugar, at which time the color changes to colorless, thus realizing naked eye detection. This strategy allows the detection of < 20 mg of cocaine in 10 min, and the detection of other targets can be achieved by replacing the aptamer crosslinking chain with simplicity and versatility. Recently, Sun et al. achieved the detection of T-2 toxin using DNA hydrogels coated with HRP [112]. HRP can catalyze the reaction of H2O2 with KI to form I2, resulting in a color change by longitudinally etching gold nanorods in the presence of high concentrations of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The LOD of this aptamer hydrogel sensor is 0.87 pg mL−1, which is lower than that of other conventional methods. In fact, natural enzymes are susceptible to environmental factors in use, so nanocomposites that mimic natural enzymes have been developed rapidly [113,114,115]. Recently, Wu et al. combined DNA hydrogels with the peroxidase activity of Cu/Au/Pt trimetallic nanoparticles to achieve the quantitative detection of microcystin-LR (MC-LR) [116]. Solubilization of DNA hydrogels by competitive binding of MC-LR to aptamers releases preloaded nanoparticles. The nanoparticles show greater catalytic activity than mono- or bimetals and catalyzes the production of oxTMB products visible to the naked eye from the substrate 3,3,5,5-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in the presence of H2O2. Based on this sensitive strategy, a detection limit of 3 ng L−1 is achieved, offering the possibility to analyze actual samples.

Functional nucleic acid DNAzyme, which can be assembled in the hydrogel network as a cross-linker, represents a class of catalytic DNA structures that can mimic the function of natural enzymes, has the advantages of low preparation cost and good thermal stability [117]. For example, Mao et al. prepared a DNA hydrogel with target DNA triggering and DNAzyme functionalization [118]. By sequence design of the padlock template of the target DNA, the macroscopic hydrogel formed by the triggered RCA amplification can be made to have a degree of G-quadruplex structure. Upon addition of hemin, the DNAzyme activity of G-tetramer/hemin can catalyze the oxidation of the colorless substrate 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethyl-benzothiozoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) to green ABTS*, achieving a detection limit of 0.32 pM with no complex equipment. The constructed strategy has excellent accuracy and reliability, which is expected to realize the application in remote areas. DNAzyme also allows DNA self-cleavage reactions assisted by the metal ions, of which metal ions are indispensable cofactors, which provides the possibility of their detection. Lin et al. used Cu2+-dependent DNAzyme/substrate complexes to cross-link linear polymers into hydrogels for the detection of Cu2+ [119]. AuNPs are preloaded in hydrogels as colorimetric indicators, and the addition of metal ions activates the DNAzyme, which then undergo irreversible cleavage reactions at the cleavage sites, thus bypassing the competitive mechanism of stoichiometric ratios, improving sensitivity, and with excellent specificity. Similar methods can also be used for the detection of Ln3+ [120].

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases, the adaptive immune system of microorganisms, have revolutionized the field of biomedicine since their discovery [121]. Besides being widely used as a gene editing tool, it also has a promising development in the field of nucleic acid detection [122,123,124,125]. Cas12a displays specific cleavage activity for RNA-directed dsDNA (targeted cleavage) and efficient cleavage of nearby ssDNA with non-specific multi-turnover upon activation (lateral cleavage) [126]. DNA-responsive hydrogels use ssDNA as a crosslinker and are ideally suited to dock with the non-specific cleavage activity of Cas12a. The responsive properties of conventional DNA hydrogels rely on strand displacement or structural changes of DNA cross-linkers, which may require higher target concentrations. In contrast, side-branch cleavage by Cas12a enzymes can control the properties of DNA hydrogels in a modular fashion at multiple scales, thereby effectively translating external stimuli into changes in material properties upon signal amplification. In 2020, Max A. English and colleagues combined the DNA hydrogels with Cas12a nuclease to enable colorimetric detection [126]. DNA-polyacrylamide hydrogels pre-loaded with AuNPs are synthesized, in which the cross-linked strands contain AT-rich Cas12a lateral branch cleavage sites. When the hydrogel is exposed to Cas12a and triggers dsDNA, the bridging strand is cleaved and the gel degrades thereby releasing AuNPs to achieve colorimetric detection of dsDNA. This platform offers improved programmability and increased sensitivity of hydrogels, showing promise for a wide range of applications.

DNA hydrogels in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) biosensing

Due to the advantages of non-destructive detection, high sensitivity, biocompatibility and specificity, SERS has been widely investigated in the field of biosensing [127]. The switchable DNA hydrogel allows for SERS signal flexibility, and the incorporation of DNA not only delivers stimulus response characteristics, but also allows for signal amplification in combination with amplification means.

Recently, Wang et al. combined the advantages of SERS with stimulus-responsive DNA hydrogels for the detection of α-fetoprotein (AFP) [56]. Immunoglobulin IgG is encapsulated in an AFP cross-linked DNA hydrogel, and upon introduction of AFP, the aptamer binds to it causing the hydrogel to disintegrate and IgG to be released. Subsequently, in the solution, the SERS probe, biofunctional magnetic beads can form a sandwich structure with IgG, and the Raman signal of the supernatant is reduced after magnetic separation. A higher concentration of AFP releases more IgG, more SERS probes bound, and weaker Raman signal obtained for quantitative detection of AFP. In addition, He and coworkers constructed a flexible SERS sensor based on DNAzyme hydrogels for UO22+ detection [128]. The UO22+-dependent DNAzyme is used as a cross-linker to form a hydrogel encapsulating the Raman probe RhB, at which point the Raman signal is negligible. Upon addition of the target, the DNAzyme complex responds by dissociating the hydrogel, and the released Raman probe can generate Raman signal, enabling the specific detection of UO22+.

Combined with a signal amplification strategy, He et al. constructed a switchable target-responsive DNA hydrogel SERS sensing platform to achieve sensitive detection of miRNA-155 [129]. As shown in the Fig. 5A, the Raman reporter molecule toluidine blue (TB) is encapsulated in an L1 cross-linked DNA hydrogel, physically isolated from the substrate. The R1 sequence, which is complementary to L1, is designed to act as a “key” to turn on the switch for cutting the DNA hydrogel, and the S1 and R1 partly hybridizes to act as a “magic box” so that R1 could not function. In the absence of the target RNA, it shows a blind Raman signal in the off state. When the target miRNA-155 is present, the RNA dissociates from R1 by fully complementary hybridization with S1, after which the hybrid is cleaved by specific double-stranded nuclease (DSN) to regenerate the target RNA and enters the next cycle, thus releasing a large amount of R1. When the mixture containing multiplicative R1 is mixed with the gel, L1 can bind with R1 to open the three-dimensional structure and TB molecules are released, generating a strong Raman signal for quantitative detection. Based on this label-free, high-sensitivity detection principle, the platform achieves a detection limit of 0.083 fM and a linear range of 0.1 fM-100 pM, which is promising for clinical applications. Later, in 2019, He and colleagues constructed DNA hydrogel-based ratiometric SERS sensor that further improved the detection sensitivity [130]. In this paper, 3-mercaptophenylboronic acid (3-MPBA) is used as a SERS substrate, which can efficiently and specifically react with H2O2 to produce the corresponding phenol. The borate-to-phenol reaction produces a Raman peak of 883 cm−1, while the Raman peak of the substrate itself of 996 cm−1 remains essentially unchanged during this conversion, thus allowing for ratiometric measurements. Glucose oxidase (GOx) is encapsulated in the linker cross-linked DNA hydrogel, and when the target RNA appears, it will dissociate R in the same cyclic steps as above, and the dissociated R strand can disintegrate the hydrogel by hybridizing with the hydrogel linker, and Gox is released to catalyze the production of H2O2 from glucose, and the resulting H2O2 reacts with 3-MPBA to produce 3-hydroxyphenol (3-HTP). In this way, the peak intensity ratio of 883 cm−1 to 996 cm−1 is proportional to the amount of target RNA, achieving a detection limit of 7.75 aM and providing an alternative method for highly sensitive and accurate detection of trace amounts of the target. Recently, Si et al. achieved high-throughput target detection based on the SERS sensor array [131]. As shown in Fig. 5B, the array consists of nine sensing units with streptavidin (SA)-modified sensor units enclosed in switchable DNA hydrogels, at which point the SERS tags (biotin/4-mercaptobenzoni-trile-functionalized AuAg alloy nanoparticles (B/M-AuAgNPs)) cannot bind to them, showing a blank or weak Raman signal. After the introduction of the target RNA, the DNA hydrogel of the corresponding sensing unit is disintegrated and the SERS tag can bind to the SA-modified sensor surface through the dissolved liquid-phase hydrogel, generating a strong raman signal, thus enabling the detection of multiple targets in a sample.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Examples of stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogel-based other optical detection. A Mechanism of the rationmatric SERS biosensing strategy via target-responsive DNA hydrogel. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [130]. B Schematic of multiple miRNAs detection in one sample using DNA hydrogel-based SERS biosensor array. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [131]. C Schematic diagram of the SA encapsulated DNA hydrogel-based SPR biosensing strategy for PML/RARα detection. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [134]

DNA hydrogels in other optical analysis

Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is a label-free, real-time analytical method that enables high sensitivity detection while being fast and efficient [132, 133]. DNA hydrogels can enhance the SPR signal significantly by recognizing and encapsulating large molecular weight substances to form supramolecular weight nanostructures. Recently, Guo et al. used a DNA self-assembling aptamer hydrogel-coated SA for signal amplification to achieve label-free, enzyme-free, ultrasensitive detection of the fusion gene PML/RARα with SPR as the output signal [134]. As shown in the Fig. 5C, two types of building blocks X1 and X2 are prepared by sequence design, both of which have SA aptamer sequences at the 5′ end for capturing SA and complementary sticky ends at the 3′ end for mutual binding. After adding the target, the capture probe immobilized on the chip surface hybridizes with it, and the exposed fragment of the target can hybridize with X1, which then hybridize with X2, and cross-linked sequentially to finally form an aptamer-based networked hydrogel nanostructure. The aptamer can bind a large amount of SA and further amplify the reaction signal. And in the absence of the target, the hydrogel structure cannot be formed and the background signal is negligible. The SPR sensor enables fM level detection of PML/RARα with a linear range of 100 fM-10 nM, and the excellent performance make it possible to provide a platform alternative for efficient detection of multiple fusion genes in clinical diagnosis.

Chemiluminescence (CL) method offers the advantages of no external light source, high sensitivity and simple operation. Recently, Lin et al. used target-responsive hydrogels coated with Au@HKUST-1 to form a CL biosensor for adenosine-specific detection [135]. The ssDNA, hemin aptamer, and adenosine aptamer are complementary to each other and cross-linked to form a DNA hydrogel. The hydrogel forms an "AND" logic gate and only when both adenosine and hemin are present, the hydrogel will dissociate to release the encapsulated Au@HKUST-1. In this case, the formed G-quadruplex/hemin and Au@HKUST-1, which enter the CL system, can achieve dual signal amplification of CL. This CL sensor can detect adenosine down to 1.04 × 10–13 mol L−1 and can provide an alternative method for adenosine detection. The CL system with long afterglow can maintain a stable signal intensity during analysis and is a hot research topic in this field [136, 137]. The dense structure and mechanical rigidity of DNA hydrogels cause a confinement effect that effectively retards the diffusion of reactants, resulting in long-lasting CL. For example, Wu and coworkers constructed a glow-type CL system based on DNA hydrogels and realized biosensing applications [55].

Recently, Zhu et al. reported a DNA hydrogel-based electrochemiluminescent (ECL) sensing strategy for miRNA detection [54]. This strategy utilizes the strong affinity and good ECL properties of amphiphilic pyrene derivative (PTC-DEDA) as DNA embedding agent and ECL luminescent. In the presence of the target miRNA, a nonlinear chain hybridization reaction is induced to generate DNA hydrogels in situ, which can be loaded with large amounts of PTC-DEDA to achieve a strong ECL signal. The constructed DNA hydrogel biosensing platform provides an ECL analysis method with an LOD of 1.49 fM.

DNA hydrogels in electrochemical biosensing

The electrochemical biosensor offers high sensitivity, requires low sample volume, responds quickly, and has convenient handling and portability [138]. Owing to these advantages, electrochemical biosensors based on stimulus-responsive DNA hydrogels were developed. For example, Ding’s group fabricated an electrochemical biosensor based on DNA-hybridized hydrogels for miRNA-21 detection [139]. As shown in Fig. 6A, ferrocene-labeled recognition probes are used as cross-linked strands to form a hybrid DNA hydrogel immobilized on an indium tin oxide/polyethylene terephthalate (ITO/PET) electrode. When the target miRNA-21 is added, the crosslinked chain dissociates with its recognition, the hydrogel disintegrates, the ferrocene label decreases, and the measurable current reduces. It can be effectively detected by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Results show that the method is well linear in the range of 10 nM-50 μM and has great potential as a sensitive detection platform.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Reproduced with permission from Ref. [139]. B Surface-immobilized enzyme@DNA hydrogel formed by surficial primer-induced (SPI) strategy. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [140]. C The hydrogel film immobilizes on electrode through HPA and pH induces the crosslinked density change. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [142]

Schematic illustration of stimuli-responsive hydrogel-based electrochemical biosensing strategies. A The self-assembly DNA hydrogel is immobilized on ITO electrode and miR-21 can induce the dissociation of it through recognizing with probe.

The pure DNA hydrogel is easily molded into the desired size and shape by controlling the raw material concentration and reaction time. The first study of pure DNA hydrogels immobilized on an electrode surface came from Li’s group [140]. In situ growth of DNA hydrogel soft scaffolds on transparent ITO electrodes enabled simultaneous colorimetric and electrochemical measurements. As shown in Fig. 6B, primer I bound at the electrode surface can trigger linear rolling circle amplification (LRCA) to form long ssDNA, and the added primer II and primer III can bind ssDNA for multi-primed rolling circle amplification (MRCA), thus self-assembling to form pure DNA hydrogels. The hydrogel can encapsulate an extensive number of enzymes and provide a catalytic system. Due to the molecular sieving effect and good swelling/de-swelling behavior, sensitive detection of targets in serum samples can be achieved directly. In addition, the synthesized hydrogels show good long-term stability and cycling stability under different conditions. The study shows that the combination of DNA hydrogels and surface biosensing devices can broaden the scope and enhance the flexibility of DNA hydrogel applications in bioanalysis. This work will stimulate the exploration of surface immobilized DNA hydrogels for wider applications in 3D interfacial biosensing systems. In 2019, Deng et al. reported a pure DNA hydrogel structure based on non-template thermostable amplification formation, enabling ultrasensitive high-throughput detection of miRNAs on electrode microarrays [141]. After binding to the target, the exposed 3′-hydroxyl terminus of the probe DNA on the electrode surface will spread the raw material bio-dATPs by the non-template extension of TdT, and then proceed to self-multi-furcation after the addition of T20G5 sequence, forming a DNA hydrogel after continuous cycling. Avidin-HRP can be anchored to the hydrogel by streptavidin-biotin interactions and oxidized TMB as a proton donor for electroreduction, allowing detection by voltammetry and amperometry. This strategy provides a universal easy-to-perform gel generation formulation that is expected to be an alternative method for early diagnosis of disease-associated DNA, non-coding RNA and proteins (through the use of aptamers).

The hindering effect of DNA hydrogels on the electron transfer on the electrode surface affords the possibility of their use in the construction of impedance biosensors. Yang and coworkers developed a DNA hydrogel-based electrochemical impedance biosensor for the detection of heparanase (HPA) [142]. As in Fig. 6C, a cross-linked strand of DNA hydrogel is immobilized on the surface of the electrode and used as a capture probe. The two DNA elements grafted by the linear polymer are associated with HPA and pH response, respectively. When HPA is present, binding of the HPA-responsive element, in turn, induces the two DNA elements to hybridize with the capture DNA to form a DNA hydrogel membrane. As the pH drops to 5.0, the pH-responsive element can form an I-motif structure, the hydrogel density increases, and the signal is further amplified. The constructed impedance biosensor can detect HPA down to 0.003 pg mL−1 and has preliminary application prospects. Tang’s group assembled DNA hydrogels based on Hg2+-induced targeting cycle of Mg2+-specific DNAzyme and HCR to construct an electrochemical impedance biosensor, for sensitive and selective detection of Hg2+ [143]. The hairpin H1 is fixed on the electrode, and then the Hg2+-dependent cleavage activity of DNAzyme is used for cyclic amplification of ssDNA signal. The ssDNA can open hairpin H1, and the exposed sequence of the opened hairpin triggers HCR of H2 and H3, which are assembled layer by layer to form DNA hydrogel. The impedance sensor has a lower detection limit of 0.042 pM and a broad detection range of 0.1 pM-10 nM, which is potentially advantageous for Hg2+ detection in complex matrices such as river water.

While DNA hydrogel-based electrochemical sensing has excellent signal amplification capabilities, the future challenge is to develop DNA hydrogel-based electrochemical sensing strategies that are more stable and can operate in a variety of environments.

DNA hydrogels in POCT application

With portability, stability, and ease of operation, POCT devices are particularly suitable for scenarios with limited resources, such as less industrialized countries, remote or disaster-stricken areas, and home healthcare [144,145,146]. And volumetric or phase change properties of DNA hydrogels in response to stimulus are considered as ideal signal transduction strategies for designing POCT devices [147, 148].

In this pursuit, personal glucose meters (PGMs), one of the most established commercially available quantitative portable devices, are widely used in DNA hydrogel-based biosensor manufacturing. For example, Tan and coworkers used aptamer cross-linked DNA hydrogels for signal transduction and PGMs as signal readout devices for non-glucose target quantification [70]. As shown in Fig. 7A, the DNA hydrogel formed by the aptamer cross-linking is encapsulated with glucoamylase. Upon target introduction, the aptamer recognizes and dissociates, and the disintegrating hydrogel releases the glucoamylase, which are released from the bundle into the solution to hydrolyze amylose into glucose for quantitative readout by PGM. The method only requires switching the aptamer sequence to achieve the detection of different targets. Si et al. based on the above work designed the cross-linked strands of DNA hydrogels as multicomponent nucleases (MNAzymes) to enable the detection of miRNAs [50]. Further signal amplification is achieved as the MNAzyme activated by target addition can catalyze the cleavage of multiple substrate chains. Using DNA tetrahedral hydrogels as signaling transducers, Gao et al. achieved in situ analysis of DNA methyltransferase (MTase) activity based on PGM [149]. In this work, commercially available glucose test strips are used as reaction substrates, loaded with DNA hydrogels encapsulating glycosylase and reaction substrates. Reaction readings are taken by phase change, and in contrast to the work described above, all processes for this analysis are performed on paper, eliminating the need for multiple separation and washing steps, facilitating its use in field assays. Although glucose meters can be quantitative, they still require external electronics, so an integrated strategy combining DNA hydrogels with a volumetric bar graph chip (V-chip) for “detector-free” testing has been developed [150]. As shown in Fig. 7B, DNA hydrogels encapsulating Au@PtNPs are synthesized with the aptamer as the crosslinker and stored in the repository in the lower left corner of the V-chip. Au@PtNPs can catalyze the production of oxygen from H2O2, generating pressure to drive the flow of liquid. After adding the target, the disintegrating DNA hydrogel releases Au@PtNPs, at which time the top layer of the chip is slid to form three channels in the horizontal direction, the bottom channel (green) applying negative pressure to attract the supernatant containing Au@PtNPs, the middle channel (yellow) adding H2O2 substrate, and the top channel (red) adding red ink as a color indicator. After completion, continue to slide the chip, the horizontal channel will be separated and the vertical channel will be connected. The oxygen generated after the catalytic reaction can drive the ink to move up in the tube, and the moving distance in a certain time is proportional to the concentration of the target, thus achieving visual quantitative detection. Adopting the similar approach, this group introduced an immunoaffinity column (IAC) portable enrichment technique to achieve the detection of Ochratoxin A (OTA) in beer, obtaining high sensitivity and low detection limit (0.51 ppb), which is beneficial to ensure food safety and human health [151]. The same group successfully achieved quantitative detection of Pb2+ using V-chip by designing the cross-linking agent as a Pb2+-dependent DNAzyme [152]. However, due to some limitations in fabrication and pretreatment of the V-chip, the group went on to combine a Pb2+-dependent DNAzyme hydrogel with a handheld pressuremeter for quantitative POCT and obtained sensitive detection results with simple sample processing [153]. The method could also be used in combination with an electronic balance for the detection of aflatoxin B1(AFB1) [69].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Schematic illustration of stimuli-responsive hydrogel-based POCT applications. A Target-responsive hydrogel PGM Readout for quantitative POCT. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [70]. B Integrating Au@Pt nanoparticle encapsulated DNA hydrogel with volumetric bar-chart chip for quantitative POCT. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [150]. C Schematic diagram of DNA gel formation through RCA in bead voids. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [158]

The DNA hydrogel-based microfluidic system provides inspiration for the development of a reliable and affordable POCT platform. Compared to surface-based nucleic acid systems, hydrogels have advantages in terms of solution-like environment and non-contaminating properties, especially in applications with complex matrices [154]. In addition, the stability of hydrogels allows for normal reaction under demanding mixing or flow conditions [155].Utilizing a microfluidic system, Lee et al. constructed an in-situ formed DNA hydrogel using isothermal amplification to detect the pathogens in viruses or bacteria, and the system was named as DhiTACT [156]. As the solution to be tested flows through the microfluidic channel, the ssDNA of the pathogen can bind to the target DNA to excite the isothermal amplification to form long ssDNA. Subsequently, DhiTACT allows the product to self-assemble to form a DNA hydrogel, which in turn blocks the microfluidic channel, thus, enabling the detection of Bacillus anthracis and Ebola virus. However, the sensitivity of the developed system is restricted by a large number of the DNA strands required for the gel to block the microfluidic channel. Subsequently, authors developed an improved system, named as DhITACT-TR (TRail) [157]. The next-generation system polymerizes the surface-associated isothermal RCA of the target nucleic acid coupled with TRail for the rapid and sensitive detection of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) virus in the pseudo-serum samples. With fluorescence optical detection, a rapid diagnosis of the MERS virus can be achieved within 30 min with a 100-fold improvement in sensitivity. Compared with the current diagnostic platforms, TRail can provide a superior cost-effectiveness. With high potential for clinical application, it is expected to be an outstanding diagnostic platform for the prevention of the infectious diseases. Similarly, a new microfluidic device has been developed that grows the DNA hydrogels on the surface of numerous microbeads filled in the microfluidic channels, thus, blocking the flow paths formed between the microbeads [158]. As shown in Fig. 7C, the RCA process takes place on the surface of each microbead, and the increased surface area for reaction and reduced cross-sectional area of the channels lead to a significant reduction in the detection time (less than 15 min). Subsequently, the detection limit is enhanced by 10-100 folds as compared to the other detection systems. By integrating a multi-channel design, multiple analyses can be performed simultaneously, and the system can be practically used for screening in airports and infectious disease transmission areas.

In recent years, the applications of DNA hydrogels in microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) have also been extensively investigated, where paper is readily available, stable, and can also be folded to form multilayer microfluidic channels [159, 160]. In 2015, Wei and colleagues combined DNA hydrogels with μPADs to build a versatile POCT platform [161]. The aptamer is used as a cross-linking agent for the DNA hydrogel, and the stable hydrogel prevents the flow of colored dye in the absence of the target. In the presence of the target, the DNA hydrogel disintegrates and the colored liquid flowing down can be observed in the detection area. The method enables simultaneous semi-quantitative detection of adenosine, cocaine and Pb2+. Subsequently, the same research group introduced a new approach that implemented different forms of output. The specific principle is to use DNA hydrogels to encapsulate amylase, and the amylase released from the disintegrated hydrogels catalyzes the hydrolysis of amylose to glucose, then the resulting glucose is oxidized by GOx to generate H2O2, which acts with HRP on different substrates to achieve different signal outputs. When catalyzed with colorless 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB), brown insoluble poly-3,3′-diaminobenzidine [Poly (DAB)] is produced, relying on μPAD for visual distance quantitative readings [162]. When applied to colorless iodide, the iodine generated is colored in the detection zone of μPAD, allowing not only semi-quantitative detection by the naked eye, but also the capture of images by electronic devices, which can be analyzed and then saved and transported via cloud computing for telemedicine [163].

The current DNA-based hydrogels are relatively expensive to prepare, hindering their practical application as disposable devices in POCT scenarios. In the future, reducing the cost of DNA hydrogel synthesis or improving the reusability of DNA hydrogels becomes the direction of effort.

DNA hydrogels in other biosensing signals

DNA hydrogel-based low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) biosensing

Recently, Wang and colleagues reported a nanoprobe based on LF-NMR and stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels for sensitive and efficient detection of bisphenol A (BPA) [86]. As shown in Fig. 8A, the three-dimensional polymer network of the DNA hydrogel allows for the sustainable release of the encapsulants, thereby simplifying the experimental manipulation of LF-NMR and reducing sample loss. In this work, DNA hydrogels encapsulating Fe3O4 superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are synthesized using the target aptamer as a cross-linking agent, at which time the Fe3O4 SPIONs are in the aggregated state. Upon addition of the target, the aptamer dissociates by binding to it, causing the DNA hydrogel to disintegrate and the released aggregated particles to disperse, resulting in a decrease in relaxation time T2, leading to quantitative detection of the signal change detected by LF-NMR. Through the flexible design of the probe, the method can provide alternative assays for clinical diagnostics, environmental monitoring and food safety testing etc.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic illustration of stimuli-responsive hydrogel-based other biosensing applications. A Schematic of the LF-NMR biosensor based on Switchable DNA hydrogel. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [86]. B Schematic representation for the PEC biosensor based on PD-responsive DNA hydrogel and Bi2Sn2O7/Bi2S3heterojunction. Reproduced with permission from Ref.[51]

DNA hydrogel-based photoelectrochemical (PEC) biosensing

The PEC biosensor combines the advantages of bioanalysis and electrochemical analysis making it a promising analytical method, while the key to constructing PEC biosensors roots in the design and preparation of excellent photoactive nanomaterials. In 2021, Jie’s group found that the Bi2Sn2O7/Bi2S3 heterojunction formed by in situ anion exchange between S2− and Bi2Sn2O7 sensitized the PEC signal of the photoactive material [51]. Based on this, highly sensitive detection of P53 gene was achieved using switchable DNA hydrogels and Bi2Sn2O7/Bi2S3 heterojunctions. As shown in Fig. 8B, a large number of product strands (PD) are generated in the target-induced DNA exonuclease (Exo III) catalytic cycle, and DNA strands complementary to PD are used as cross-linking agents to synthesize Na2S-coated DNA hydrogels. After adding PD to the DNA hydrogel, the cross-linked chain dissociates by binding to PD and the DNA hydrogel collapses to release Na2S. The released Na2S is introduced into the Bi2Sn2O7 electrode to obtain the Bi2Sn2O7/Bi2S3 heterojunction in situ, which enhances the photocurrent of target detection by a factor of 63. The developed PEC sensor is simple to operate and provides a promising form of sensing that can be used for the detection of different targets.

Conclusion and perspectives

In conclusion, this study comprehensively reviews the specific applications of the stimulus-responsive DNA hydrogels in biosensing, along with exploring the recent advances. Though this field has developed over the years, however, there are several important challenges that need to be addressed so as to move forward. First, in the detection of large molecules, the slow mass transfer and slow response of the hydrogels limit their rapid detection ability, which is expected to be solved by the development of intelligent DNA hydrogels that respond more efficiently to large molecules. Second, the integration of the DNA hydrogels with various interfacial analysis systems is still challenging. It indicates that these systems are still in the minority in the field of bioanalysis. Thus, the integration of the hydrogels with the solid-phase interfaces needs to be effectively addressed. Next, the most existing biosensing systems based on the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels require bulky hydrogel systems, resulting in the hydrogels that require high concentrations of the target molecules to produce the phase transitions. It enhances the cost of synthesis and reduces the sensitivity of the reaction. Therefore, the development of microgels or DNA hydrogel films is one of the ways to overcome this issue in the future. In addition, due to the diversity of envisioned DNA hydrogel application scenarios, the environmental stability of DNA hydrogels needs to be improved. The presence of complex environmental matrices also places demand on the specificity of DNA hydrogels, which relies on the continuous improvement and development of aptamer screening techniques. Then, the colorimetric-based sensing methods are straightforward and have a wide prospect in POCT detection. However, the issues with sensitivity and quantification compromise their application. These can be overcome by combination with the efficient signal amplification strategies. Next, the stimuli-responsive DNA hydrogels are currently in their infancy for building the intelligent materials with built-in logic decisions. It is envisioned that the molecular logic gates constructed from the stimulus-responsive DNA hydrogels hold a significant promise for improving the information processing. Finally, it should be noted that the prevailing challenges may be gradually resolved through continuous advances in biochemistry and materials chemistry. It is expected that the fast-response, low-cost and ultra-sensitive smart DNA hydrogel biosensors will soon find uses in POCT detection, wearable and implantable biosensing devices, soft robotics, etc.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

POCT:

Point-of-care testing

YMA:

Y-monomer A

YMB:

Y-monomer B

GSH:

Glutathione

dsDNA:

Double-stranded DNA

HCR:

Hybridization chain reaction

RCA:

Rolling circle amplification

MCA:

Multi-primed chain amplification

ssDNA:

Single-stranded DNA

HRP:

Horseradish peroxidase

IFSs:

I-motif-sequence forming sequences

pNIPAM:

Poly-N-isopropylacrylamide

QD:

Quantum dot

CNT:

Carbon nanotube

MOF:

Metal organic framework

CD:

Carbon dot

PpIX:

Protoporphyrin IX

SWCNT:

Single-walled carbon nanotube

CB[8]:

Cucurbit[8]uril

FRET:

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer

dNTP:

Deoxynucleotide triphosphate

TdT:

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase

dATP:

Deoxyadenosine triphosphate

DNase I:

DNA endonuclease I

BHQ:

Black hole quencher

AuNPs:

Gold nanoparticles

CTAB:

Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

MC-LR:

Microcystin-LR

TMB:

3,3,5,5-Tetramethylbenzidine

ABTS:

2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethyl-benzothiozoline-6-sulfonic acid)

CRISPR:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

SERS:

Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

AFP:

α-Fetoprotein

TB:

Toluidine blue

DSN:

Double-stranded nuclease

3-MPBA:

3-Mercaptophenylboronic acid

3-HTP:

3-Hydroxyphenol

SA:

Streptavidin

SPR:

Surface plasmon resonance

CL:

Chemiluminescence

ECL:

Electrochemiluminescent

PTC-DEDA:

Amphiphilic pyrene derivative

ITO/PET:

Indium tin oxide/polyethylene terephthalate

CV:

Cyclic voltammetry

DPV:

Differential pulse voltammetry

LRCA:

Linear rolling circle amplification

MRCA:

Multi-primed rolling circle amplification

HPA:

Heparanase

PGM:

Personal glucose meter

MNAzymes:

Multicomponent nucleases

MTase:

Methyltransferase

V-chip:

Volumetric bar graph chip

IAC:

Immunoaffinity column

OTA:

Ochratoxin A

AFB1:

Aflatoxin B1

MERS:

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome

μPADs:

Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices

DAB:

3,3′-Diaminobenzidine

LF-NMR:

Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance

BPA:

Bisphenol A

SPIONs:

Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

PEC:

Photoelectrochemical

PD:

Product strand

References

  1. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature. 1953;171:737–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodnow RA Jr, Dumelin CE, Keefe AD. DNA-encoded chemistry: enabling the deeper sampling of chemical space. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:131–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kornyshev AA, Olson W. From DNA-inspired physics to physics-inspired biology. J Phys Condens Matter. 2010;22: 410301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceze L, Nivala J, Strauss K. Molecular digital data storage using DNA. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:456–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farzadfard F, Lu TK. Emerging applications for DNA writers and molecular recorders. Science. 2018;361:870–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Hong T, Wang S, Mo J, Tian T, Zhou X. Epigenetic modification of nucleic acids: from basic studies to medical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46:2844–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou LY, Zagorovsky K, Chan WC. DNA assembly of nanoparticle superstructures for controlled biological delivery and elimination. Nat Nanotechnol. 2014;9:148–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JB, Peng S, Yang D, Roh YH, Funabashi H, Park N, Rice EJ, Chen L, Long R, Wu M, Luo D. A mechanical metamaterial made from a DNA hydrogel. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:816–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roh YH, Ruiz RC, Peng S, Lee JB, Luo D. Engineering DNA-based functional materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:5730–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rothemund PW. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature. 2006;440:297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shao Y, Jia H, Cao T, Liu D. Supramolecular hydrogels based on DNA self-assembly. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:659–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim J, Jang D, Park H, Jung S, Kim DH, Kim WJ. Functional-DNA-driven dynamic nanoconstructs for biomolecule capture and drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2018;30: e1707351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cangialosi A, Yoon C, Liu J, Huang Q, Guo J, Nguyen TD, Gracias DH, Schulman R. DNA sequence-directed shape change of photopatterned hydrogels via high-degree swelling. Science. 2017;357:1126–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng E, Xing Y, Chen P, Yang Y, Sun Y, Zhou D, Xu L, Fan Q, Liu D. A pH-triggered, fast-responding DNA hydrogel. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48:7660–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dembska A. The analytical and biomedical potential of cytosine-rich oligonucleotides: a review. Anal Chim Acta. 2016;930:1–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deshpande SR, Hammink R, Nelissen FHT, Rowan AE, Heus HA. Biomimetic stress sensitive hydrogel controlled by DNA nanoswitches. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18:3310–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo W, Lu CH, Orbach R, Wang F, Qi XJ, Cecconello A, Seliktar D, Willner I. pH-stimulated DNA hydrogels exhibiting shape-memory properties. Adv Mater. 2015;27:73–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Motornov M, Sheparovych R, Lupitskyy R, MacWilliams E, Minko S. Responsive colloidal systems: reversible aggregation and fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;310:481–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ren J, Hu Y, Lu CH, Guo W, Aleman-Garcia MA, Ricci F, Willner I. pH-responsive and switchable triplex-based DNA hydrogels. Chem Sci. 2015;6:4190–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu Y, Nakano M, Ikeda T. Photomechanics: directed bending of a polymer film by light. Nature. 2003;425:145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang S, Liu F, Lerch A, Ionov L, Agarwal S. Unusual and superfast temperature-triggered actuators. Adv Mater. 2015;27:4865–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YS, Liu M, Ishida Y, Ebina Y, Osada M, Sasaki T, Hikima T, Takata M, Aida T. Thermoresponsive actuation enabled by permittivity switching in an electrostatically anisotropic hydrogel. Nat Mater. 2015;14:1002–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xing Y, Cheng E, Yang Y, Chen P, Zhang T, Sun Y, Yang Z, Liu D. Self-assembled DNA hydrogels with designable thermal and enzymatic responsiveness. Adv Mater. 2011;23:1117–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dave N, Chan MY, Huang PJ, Smith BD, Liu J. Regenerable DNA-functionalized hydrogels for ultrasensitive, instrument-free mercury(II) detection and removal in water. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:12668–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo W, Qi XJ, Orbach R, Lu CH, Freage L, Mironi-Harpaz I, Seliktar D, Yang HH, Willner I. Reversible Ag(+)-crosslinked DNA hydrogels. Chem Commun (Camb). 2014;50:4065–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lilienthal S, Shpilt Z, Wang F, Orbach R, Willner I. Programmed DNAzyme-triggered dissolution of dna-based hydrogels: means for controlled release of biocatalysts and for the activation of enzyme cascades. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:8923–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guiseppi-Elie A. Electroconductive hydrogels: synthesis, characterization and biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2701–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rokita B, Rosiak JM, Ulanski P. Ultrasound-induced cross-linking and formation of macroscopic covalent hydrogels in aqueous polymer and monomer solutions. Macromolecules. 2009;42:3269–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang YY, Zhang LM, Jiang W, Li W. Embedding magnetic nanoparticles into polysaccharide-based hydrogels for magnetically assisted bioseparation. Chemphyschem. 2007;8:2367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu TY, Hu SH, Liu KH, Liu DM, Chen SY. Study on controlled drug permeation of magnetic-sensitive ferrogels: effect of Fe3O4 and PVA. J Control Release. 2008;126:228–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eddington DT, Beebe DJ. Flow control with hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:199–210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kang H, Trondoli AC, Zhu G, Chen Y, Chang YJ, Liu H, Huang YF, Zhang X, Tan W. Near-infrared light-responsive core-shell nanogels for targeted drug delivery. ACS Nano. 2011;5:5094–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nishikawa M, Mizuno Y, Mohri K, Matsuoka N, Rattanakiat S, Takahashi Y, Funabashi H, Luo D, Takakura Y. Biodegradable CpG DNA hydrogels for sustained delivery of doxorubicin and immunostimulatory signals in tumor-bearing mice. Biomaterials. 2011;32:488–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Song J, Im K, Hwang S, Hur J, Nam J, Ahn GO, Hwang S, Kim S, Park N. DNA hydrogel delivery vehicle for light-triggered and synergistic cancer therapy. Nanoscale. 2015;7:9433–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Um SH, Lee JB, Park N, Kwon SY, Umbach CC, Luo D. Enzyme-catalysed assembly of DNA hydrogel. Nat Mater. 2006;5:797–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang L, Jean SR, Ahmed S, Aldridge PM, Li X, Fan F, Sargent EH, Kelley SO. Multifunctional quantum dot DNA hydrogels. Nat Commun. 2017;8:381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. El-Hamed F, Dave N, Liu J. Stimuli-responsive releasing of gold nanoparticles and liposomes from aptamer-functionalized hydrogels. Nanotechnology. 2011;22: 494011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kimna C, Lieleg O. Engineering an orchestrated release avalanche from hydrogels using DNA-nanotechnology. J Control Release. 2019;304:19–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Umeki Y, Saito M, Takahashi Y, Takakura Y, Nishikawa M. Retardation of antigen release from dna hydrogel using cholesterol-modified DNA for increased antigen-specific immune response. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6:1700355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang H, Liu H, Kang H, Tan W. Engineering target-responsive hydrogels based on aptamer-target interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:6320–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Singh S, Mishra A, Kumari R, Sinha KK, Singh MK, Das P. Carbon dots assisted formation of DNA hydrogel for sustained release of drug. Carbon (New York). 2017;114:169–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jin J, Xing Y, Xi Y, Liu X, Zhou T, Ma X, Yang Z, Wang S, Liu D. A triggered DNA hydrogel cover to envelop and release single cells. Adv Mater. 2013;25:4714–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shea LD, Smiley E, Bonadio J, Mooney DJ. DNA delivery from polymer matrices for tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:551–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Song P, Ye D, Zuo X, Li J, Wang J, Liu H, Hwang MT, Chao J, Su S, Wang L, Shi J, Wang L, Huang W, Lal R, Fan C. DNA hydrogel with aptamer-toehold-based recognition, cloaking, and decloaking of circulating tumor cells for live cell analysis. Nano Lett. 2017;17:5193–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang L, Lei J, Liu L, Li C, Ju H. Self-assembled DNA hydrogel as switchable material for aptamer-based fluorescent detection of protein. Anal Chem. 2013;85:11077–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu Z, Wu C, Liu H, Zou Y, Zhang X, Kang H, Yang CJ, Tan W. An aptamer cross-linked hydrogel as a colorimetric platform for visual detection. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:1052–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Miyata T, Uragami T, Nakamae K. Biomolecule-sensitive hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:79–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chu J, Chen C, Li X, Yu L, Li W, Cheng M, Tang W, Xiong Z. A responsive pure DNA hydrogel for label-free detection of lead ion. Anal Chim Acta. 2021;1157: 338400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pi K, Liu J, Van Cappellen P. Direct measurement of aqueous mercury(II): combining DNA-based sensing with diffusive gradients in thin films. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54:13680–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Si Y, Li L, Wang N, Zheng J, Yang R, Li J. Oligonucleotide cross-linked hydrogel for recognition and quantitation of microRNAs based on a portable glucometer readout. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:7792–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li H, Cai Q, Yan X, Jie G. Target-switchable DNA hydrogels coupled with a Bi(2)Sn(2)O(7)/Bi(2)S(3) heterojunction based on in situ anion exchange for the “signal-on” photoelectrochemical detection of DNA. Nanoscale. 2021;13:7678–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Khajouei S, Ravan H, Ebrahimi A. Developing a colorimetric nucleic acid-responsive DNA hydrogel using DNA proximity circuit and catalytic hairpin assembly. Anal Chim Acta. 2020;1137:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zou L, Wu Z, Liu X, Zheng Y, Mei W, Wang Q, Yang X, Wang K. DNA hydrogelation-enhanced imaging ellipsometry for sensing exosomal microRNAs with a tunable detection range. Anal Chem. 2020;92:11953–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao ML, Zeng WJ, Chai YQ, Yuan R, Zhuo Y. An affinity-enhanced DNA intercalator with intense ECL embedded in DNA hydrogel for biosensing applications. Anal Chem. 2020;92:11044–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wu H, Zhao M, Li J, Zhou X, Yang T, Zhao D, Liu P, Ju H, Cheng W, Ding S. Novel protease-free long-lasting chemiluminescence system based on the Dox-ABEI chimeric magnetic DNA hydrogel for ultrasensitive immunoassay. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:47270–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang Q, Hu Y, Jiang N, Wang J, Yu M, Zhuang X. Preparation of aptamer responsive DNA functionalized hydrogels for the sensitive detection of α-fetoprotein using SERS method. Bioconjug Chem. 2020;31:813–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ma G, Zhang K, Wang H, Liang Z, Zhou L, Yan B. Versatile synthesis of a highly porous DNA/CNT hydrogel for the adsorption of the carcinogen PAH. Chem Commun (Camb). 2021;57:2289–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kahn JS, Hu Y, Willner I. Stimuli-responsive DNA-based hydrogels: from basic principles to applications. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:680–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang D, Hu Y, Liu P, Luo D. Bioresponsive DNA hydrogels: beyond the conventional stimuli responsiveness. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:733–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Nagahara S, Matsuda T. Hydrogel formation via hybridization of oligonucleotides derivatized in water-soluble vinyl polymers. Polym Gels Netw. 1996;4:111–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Li J, Zheng C, Cansiz S, Wu C, Xu J, Cui C, Liu Y, Hou W, Wang Y, Zhang L, Teng IT, Yang HH, Tan W. Self-assembly of DNA nanohydrogels with controllable size and stimuli-responsive property for targeted gene regulation therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:1412–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Nöll T, Schönherr H, Wesner D, Schopferer M, Paululat T, Nöll G. Construction of three-dimensional DNA hydrogels from linear building blocks. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53:8328–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang J, Chao J, Liu H, Su S, Wang L, Huang W, Willner I, Fan C. Clamped hybridization chain reactions for the self-assembly of patterned DNA hydrogels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:2171–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nam J, Jang WS, Kim J, Lee H, Lim CS. Lamb wave-based molecular diagnosis using DNA hydrogel formation by rolling circle amplification (RCA) process. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;142: 111496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Huang Y, Xu W, Liu G, Tian L. A pure DNA hydrogel with stable catalytic ability produced by one-step rolling circle amplification. Chem Commun (Camb). 2017;53:3038–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Xu W, Huang Y, Zhao H, Li P, Liu G, Li J, Zhu C, Tian L. DNA hydrogel with tunable pH-responsive properties produced by rolling circle amplification. Chemistry. 2017;23:18276–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gačanin J, Synatschke CV, Weil T. Biomedical applications of DNA-based hydrogels. Adv Func Mater. 2020;30:1906253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lyu D, Chen S, Guo W. Liposome crosslinked polyacrylamide/DNA hydrogel: a smart controlled-release system for small molecular payloads. Small. 2018;14: e1704039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Tang L, Huang Y, Lin C, Qiu B, Guo L, Luo F, Lin Z. Highly sensitive and selective aflatoxin B(1) biosensor based on Exonuclease I-catalyzed target recycling amplification and targeted response aptamer-crosslinked hydrogel using electronic balances as a readout. Talanta. 2020;214: 120862.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yan L, Zhu Z, Zou Y, Huang Y, Liu D, Jia S, Xu D, Wu M, Zhou Y, Zhou S, Yang CJ. Target-responsive “sweet” hydrogel with glucometer readout for portable and quantitative detection of non-glucose targets. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:3748–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bi Y, Du X, He P, Wang C, Liu C, Guo W. Smart bilayer polyacrylamide/DNA hybrid hydrogel film actuators exhibiting programmable responsive and reversible macroscopic shape deformations. Small. 2020;16: e1906998.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Li Z, Davidson-Rozenfeld G, Vázquez-González M, Fadeev M, Zhang J, Tian H, Willner I. Multi-triggered supramolecular DNA/bipyridinium dithienylethene hydrogels driven by light, redox, and chemical stimuli for shape-memory and self-healing applications. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:17691–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lilienthal S, Fischer A, Liao WC, Cazelles R, Willner I. Single and bilayer polyacrylamide hydrogel-based microcapsules for the triggered release of loads, logic gate operations, and intercommunication between microcapsules. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:31124–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lu CH, Qi XJ, Orbach R, Yang HH, Mironi-Harpaz I, Seliktar D, Willner I. Switchable catalytic acrylamide hydrogels cross-linked by hemin/G-quadruplexes. Nano Lett. 2013;13:1298–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Peng L, You M, Yuan Q, Wu C, Han D, Chen Y, Zhong Z, Xue J, Tan W. Macroscopic volume change of dynamic hydrogels induced by reversible DNA hybridization. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:12302–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Tamesue S, Takashima Y, Yamaguchi H, Shinkai S, Harada A. Photoswitchable supramolecular hydrogels formed by cyclodextrins and azobenzene polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;49:7461–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Hu Y, Kahn JS, Guo W, Huang F, Fadeev M, Harries D, Willner I. Reversible modulation of DNA-based hydrogel shapes by internal stress interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:16112–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Liu X, Zhang J, Fadeev M, Li Z, Wulf V, Tian H, Willner I. Chemical and photochemical DNA “gears” reversibly control stiffness, shape-memory, self-healing and controlled release properties of polyacrylamide hydrogels. Chem Sci. 2019;10:1008–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Guo W, Lu CH, Qi XJ, Orbach R, Fadeev M, Yang HH, Willner I. Switchable bifunctional stimuli-triggered poly-N-isopropylacrylamide/DNA hydrogels. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53:10134–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Feng X, Zhang K, Chen P, Sui X, Hempenius MA, Liedberg B, Vancso GJ. Highly swellable, dual-responsive hydrogels based on PNIPAM and redox active poly(ferrocenylsilane) poly(ionic liquid)s: synthesis, structure, and properties. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2016;37:1939–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Garcia A, Marquez M, Cai T, Rosario R, Hu Z, Gust D, Hayes M, Vail SA, Park CD. Photo-, thermally, and pH-responsive microgels. Langmuir. 2007;23:224–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Riskin M, Tel-Vered R, Willner I. Thermo-switchable charge transport and electrocatalysis using metal-ion-modified pNIPAM-functionalized electrodes. Adv Func Mater. 2009;19:2474–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Rosi NL, Mirkin CA. Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev. 2005;105:1547–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Song J, Hwang S, Im K, Hur J, Nam J, Hwang S, Ahn GO, Kim S, Park N. Light-responsible DNA hydrogel-gold nanoparticle assembly for synergistic cancer therapy. J Mater Chem. 2015;3:1537–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Eguchi Y, Kato T, Tanaka T, Maruyama T. A DNA-gold nanoparticle hybrid hydrogel network prepared by enzymatic reaction. Chem Commun (Camb). 2017;53:5802–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Wang JY, Guo QY, Yao ZY, Yin N, Ren SY, Li Y, Li S, Peng Y, Bai JL, Ning BA, Liang J, Gao ZX. A low-field nuclear magnetic resonance DNA-hydrogel nanoprobe for bisphenol A determination in drinking water. Mikrochim Acta. 2020;187:333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Wei B, Cheng I, Luo KQ, Mi Y. Capture and release of protein by a reversible DNA-induced sol-gel transition system. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47:331–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Liedl T, Dietz H, Yurke B, Simmel F. Controlled trapping and release of quantum dots in a DNA-switchable hydrogel. Small. 2007;3:1688–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Mansukhani ND, Guiney LM, Wei Z, Roth EW, Putz KW, Luijten E, Hersam MC. Optothermally reversible carbon nanotube-DNA supramolecular hybrid hydrogels. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2018;39:1700587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Cheng E, Li Y, Yang Z, Deng Z, Liu D. DNA-SWNT hybrid hydrogel. Chem Commun (Camb). 2011;47:5545–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Vázquez-González M, Willner I. DNA-responsive SiO(2) nanoparticles, metal-organic frameworks, and microcapsules for controlled drug release. Langmuir. 2018;34:14692–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Li SY, Cheng QX, Liu JK, Nie XQ, Zhao GP, Wang J. CRISPR-Cas12a has both cis- and trans-cleavage activities on single-stranded DNA. Cell Res. 2018;28:491–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Geng J, Yao C, Kou X, Tang J, Luo D, Yang D. A Fluorescent biofunctional DNA hydrogel prepared by enzymatic polymerization. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:1700998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Xu Y, Wu Q, Sun Y, Bai H, Shi G. Three-dimensional self-assembly of graphene oxide and DNA into multifunctional hydrogels. ACS Nano. 2010;4:7358–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Khajouei S, Ravan H, Ebrahimi A. DNA hydrogel-empowered biosensing. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;275: 102060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Zhang Y, Yang B, Zhang X, Xu L, Tao L, Li S, Wei Y. A magnetic self-healing hydrogel. Chem Commun (Camb). 2012;48:9305–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Kumari S, Rajit Prasad S, Mandal D, Das P. Carbon dot-DNA-protoporphyrin hybrid hydrogel for sustained photoinduced antimicrobial activity. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;553:228–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Li C, Rowland MJ, Shao Y, Cao T, Chen C, Jia H, Zhou X, Yang Z, Scherman OA, Liu D. Responsive double network hydrogels of interpenetrating DNA and CB[8] host-guest supramolecular systems. Adv Mater. 2015;27:3298–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Li C, Li H, Ge J, Jie G. Versatile fluorescence detection of microRNA based on novel DNA hydrogel-amplified signal probes coupled with DNA walker amplification. Chem Commun (Camb). 2019;55:3919–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Pi K, Liu J, Van Cappellen P. A DNA-based biosensor for aqueous Hg(II): performance under variable pH, temperature and competing ligand composition. J hazard Mater. 2020;385: 121572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Hao L, Wang W, Shen X, Wang S, Li Q, An F, Wu S. A fluorescent DNA hydrogel aptasensor based on the self-assembly of rolling circle amplification products for sensitive detection of ochratoxin A. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68:369–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Xiang B, He K, Zhu R, Liu Z, Zeng S, Huang Y, Nie Z, Yao S. Self-assembled DNA hydrogel based on enzymatically polymerized DNA for protein encapsulation and enzyme/DNAzyme hybrid cascade reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:22801–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Xu L, Wang R, Kelso LC, Ying Y, Li Y. A target-responsive and size-dependent hydrogel aptasensor embedded with QD fluorescent reporters for rapid detection of avian influenza virus H5N1. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2016;234:98–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Hong CA, Park JC, Na H, Jeon H, Nam YS. Short DNA-catalyzed formation of quantum dot-DNA hydrogel for enzyme-free femtomolar specific DNA assay. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;182: 113110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Karakuş E, Erdemir E, Demirbilek N, Liv L. Colorimetric and electrochemical detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen with a gold nanoparticle-based biosensor. Anal Chim Acta. 2021;1182: 338939.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Zheng L, Cai G, Wang S, Liao M, Li Y, Lin J. A microfluidic colorimetric biosensor for rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 using gold nanoparticle aggregation and smart phone imaging. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;124–125:143–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Baeissa A, Dave N, Smith BD, Liu J. DNA-functionalized monolithic hydrogels and gold nanoparticles for colorimetric DNA detection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2010;2:3594–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Ma Y, Mao Y, An Y, Tian T, Zhang H, Yan J, Zhu Z, Yang CJ. Target-responsive DNA hydrogel for non-enzymatic and visual detection of glucose. Analyst. 2018;143:1679–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Yin BC, Ye BC, Wang H, Zhu Z, Tan W. Colorimetric logic gates based on aptamer-crosslinked hydrogels. Chem Commun (Camb). 2012;48:1248–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Mao Y, Li J, Yan J, Ma Y, Song Y, Tian T, Liu X, Zhu Z, Zhou L, Yang C. A portable visual detection method based on a target-responsive DNA hydrogel and color change of gold nanorods. Chem Commun (Camb). 2017;53:6375–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Wu Z, He D, Cui B, Jin Z. Ultrasensitive detection of microcystin-LR with gold immunochromatographic assay assisted by a molecular imprinting technique. Food Chem. 2019;283:517–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Sun Y, Li S, Chen R, Wu P, Liang J. Ultrasensitive and rapid detection of T-2 toxin using a target-responsive DNA hydrogel. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2020;311: 127912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Guo L, Zheng H, Zhang C, Qu L, Yu L. A novel molecularly imprinted sensor based on PtCu bimetallic nanoparticle deposited on PSS functionalized graphene with peroxidase-like activity for selective determination of puerarin. Talanta. 2020;210: 120621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Wang J, Bao M, Wei T, Wang Z, Dai Z. Bimetallic metal-organic framework for enzyme immobilization by biomimetic mineralization: constructing a mimic enzyme and simultaneously immobilizing natural enzymes. Anal Chim Acta. 2020;1098:148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Huang Y, Ren J, Qu X. Nanozymes: classification, catalytic mechanisms, activity regulation, and applications. Chem Rev. 2019;119:4357–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Wu P, Li S, Ye X, Ning B, Bai J, Peng Y, Li L, Han T, Zhou H, Gao Z, Ding P. Cu/Au/Pt trimetallic nanoparticles coated with DNA hydrogel as target-responsive and signal-amplification material for sensitive detection of microcystin-LR. Anal Chim Acta. 2020;1134:96–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Zhao H, Jiang G, Weng J, Ma Q, Zhang H, Ito Y, Liu M. A signal-accumulating DNAzyme-crosslinked hydrogel for colorimetric sensing of hydrogen peroxide. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:4648–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Mao X, Pan S, Zhou D, He X, Zhang Y. Fabrication of DNAzyme-functionalized hydrogel and its application for visible detection of circulating tumor DNA. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2019;285:385–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Lin H, Zou Y, Huang Y, Chen J, Zhang WY, Zhuang Z, Jenkins G, Yang CJ. DNAzyme crosslinked hydrogel: a new platform for visual detection of metal ions. Chem Commun (Camb). 2011;47:9312–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Huang Y, Wu X, Tian T, Zhu Z, Lin H, Yang C. Target-responsive DNAzyme hydrogel for portable colorimetric detection of lanthanide(III) ions. Sci China Chem. 2016;60:293–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Sorek R, Lawrence CM, Wiedenheft B. CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013;82:237–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, Volz SE, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A, Koonin EV, Zhang F. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163:759–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Kiljunen S, Pajunen MI, Savilahti H. Transposon insertion mutagenesis for archaeal gene discovery. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1498:309–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Harrington LB, Burstein D, Chen JS, Paez-Espino D, Ma E, Witte IP, Cofsky JC, Kyrpides NC, Banfield JF, Doudna JA. Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science. 2018;362:839–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Krupovic M. Networks of evolutionary interactions underlying the polyphyletic origin of ssDNA viruses. Curr Opin Virol. 2013;3:578–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. English MA, Soenksen LR, Gayet RV, de Puig H, Angenent-Mari NM, Mao AS, Nguyen PQ, Collins JJ. Programmable CRISPR-responsive smart materials. Science. 2019;365:780–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Das GM, Managò S, Mangini M, De Luca AC. Biosensing using sers active gold nanostructures. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:2679.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. He X, Zhou X, Liu W, Liu Y, Wang X. Flexible DNA hydrogel SERS active biofilms for conformal ultrasensitive detection of uranyl ions from aquatic products. Langmuir. 2020;36:2930–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. He Y, Yang X, Yuan R, Chai Y. Switchable target-responsive 3D DNA hydrogels as a signal amplification strategy combining with SERS technique for ultrasensitive detection of miRNA 155. Anal Chem. 2017;89:8538–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. He Y, Yang X, Yuan R, Chai Y. A novel ratiometric SERS biosensor with one Raman probe for ultrasensitive microRNA detection based on DNA hydrogel amplification. J Mater Chem. 2019;7:2643–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Si Y, Xu L, Wang N, Zheng J, Yang R, Li J. Target microRNA-responsive DNA hydrogel-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor arrays for microRNA-marked cancer screening. Anal Chem. 2020;92:2649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Nguyen HH, Park J, Kang S, Kim M. Surface plasmon resonance: a versatile technique for biosensor applications. Sensors. 2015;15:10481–510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Hinman SS, McKeating KS, Cheng Q. Surface plasmon resonance: material and interface design for universal accessibility. Anal Chem. 2018;90:19–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Guo B, Wen B, Cheng W, Zhou X, Duan X, Zhao M, Xia Q, Ding S. An enzyme-free and label-free surface plasmon resonance biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of fusion gene based on DNA self-assembly hydrogel with streptavidin encapsulation. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;112:120–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Lin Y, Wang X, Sun Y, Dai Y, Sun W, Zhu X, Liu H, Han R, Gao D, Luo C. A chemiluminescent biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of adenosine based on target-responsive DNA hydrogel with Au@HKUST-1 encapsulation. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2019;289:56–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Liu J, Lécuyer T, Seguin J, Mignet N, Scherman D, Viana B, Richard C. Imaging and therapeutic applications of persistent luminescence nanomaterials. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;138:193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Lin Z, Kabe R, Wang K, Adachi C. Influence of energy gap between charge-transfer and locally excited states on organic long persistence luminescence. Nat Commun. 2020;11:191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. Chen LC, Wang E, Tai CS, Chiu YC, Li CW, Lin YR, Lee TH, Huang CW, Chen JC, Chen WL. Improving the reproducibility, accuracy, and stability of an electrochemical biosensor platform for point-of-care use. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;155: 112111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Liu S, Su W, Li Y, Zhang L, Ding X. Manufacturing of an electrochemical biosensing platform based on hybrid DNA hydrogel: taking lung cancer-specific miR-21 as an example. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;103:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Mao X, Chen G, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Zhu X, Li G. Surface-immobilized and self-shaped DNA hydrogels and their application in biosensing. Chem Sci. 2018;9:811–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Deng S, Yan J, Wang F, Su Y, Zhang X, Li Q, Liu G, Fan C, Pei H, Wan Y. In situ terminus-regulated DNA hydrogelation for ultrasensitive on-chip microRNA assay. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;137:263–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Yang ZH, Zhuo Y, Yuan R, Chai YQ. Amplified impedimetric aptasensor combining target-induced DNA hydrogel formation with pH-stimulated signal amplification for the heparanase assay. Nanoscale. 2017;9:2556–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Cai W, Xie S, Zhang J, Tang D, Tang Y. An electrochemical impedance biosensor for Hg(2+) detection based on DNA hydrogel by coupling with DNAzyme-assisted target recycling and hybridization chain reaction. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;98:466–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Yager P, Domingo GJ, Gerdes J. Point-of-care diagnostics for global health. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008;10:107–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Giljohann DA, Mirkin CA. Drivers of biodiagnostic development. Nature. 2009;462:461–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Gubala V, Harris LF, Ricco AJ, Tan MX, Williams DE. Point of care diagnostics: status and future. Anal Chem. 2012;84:487–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Li J, Mo L, Lu CH, Fu T, Yang HH, Tan W. Functional nucleic acid-based hydrogels for bioanalytical and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:1410–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Vermonden T, Censi R, Hennink WE. Hydrogels for protein delivery. Chem Rev. 2012;112:2853–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Gao X, Li X, Sun X, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Liu X, Li F. DNA tetrahedra-cross-linked hydrogel functionalized paper for onsite analysis of DNA methyltransferase activity using a personal glucose meter. Anal Chem. 2020;92:4592–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Zhu Z, Guan Z, Jia S, Lei Z, Lin S, Zhang H, Ma Y, Tian ZQ, Yang CJ. Au@Pt nanoparticle encapsulated target-responsive hydrogel with volumetric bar-chart chip readout for quantitative point-of-care testing. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53:12503–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Liu R, Huang Y, Ma Y, Jia S, Gao M, Li J, Zhang H, Xu D, Wu M, Chen Y, Zhu Z, Yang C. Design and synthesis of target-responsive aptamer-cross-linked hydrogel for visual quantitative detection of ochratoxin A. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:6982–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Huang Y, Ma Y, Chen Y, Wu X, Fang L, Zhu Z, Yang CJ. Target-responsive DNAzyme cross-linked hydrogel for visual quantitative detection of lead. Anal Chem. 2014;86:11434–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Liu D, Jia S, Zhang H, Ma Y, Guan Z, Li J, Zhu Z, Ji T, Yang CJ. Integrating target-responsive hydrogel with pressuremeter readout enables simple, sensitive, user-friendly, quantitative point-of-care testing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:22252–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Lee H, Lee J, Lee SG, Doyle PS. Hydrogel-based colorimetric assay for multiplexed microRNA detection in a microfluidic device. Anal Chem. 2020;92:5750–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Le Goff GC, Srinivas RL, Hill WA, Doyle PS. Hydrogel microparticles for biosensing. Eur Polymer J. 2015;72:386–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Lee HY, Jeong H, Jung IY, Jang B, Seo YC, Lee H, Lee H. DhITACT: DNA hydrogel formation by isothermal amplification of complementary target in fluidic channels. Adv Mater. 2015;27:3513–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Jung IY, You JB, Choi BR, Kim JS, Lee HK, Jang B, Jeong HS, Lee K, Im SG, Lee H. A highly sensitive molecular detection platform for robust and facile diagnosis of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) corona virus. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5:2168–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Na W, Nam D, Lee H, Shin S. Rapid molecular diagnosis of infectious viruses in microfluidics using DNA hydrogel formation. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;108:9–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  159. Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM. Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:19606–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Parolo C, Merkoçi A. Paper-based nanobiosensors for diagnostics. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:450–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Wei X, Tian T, Jia S, Zhu Z, Ma Y, Sun J, Lin Z, Yang CJ. Target-responsive DNA hydrogel mediated “stop-flow” microfluidic paper-based analytic device for rapid, portable and visual detection of multiple targets. Anal Chem. 2015;87:4275–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Wei X, Tian T, Jia S, Zhu Z, Ma Y, Sun J, Lin Z, Yang CJ. Microfluidic distance readout sweet hydrogel integrated paper-based analytical device (μDiSH-PAD) for visual quantitative point-of-care testing. Anal Chem. 2016;88:2345–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Tian T, Wei X, Jia S, Zhang R, Li J, Zhu Z, Zhang H, Ma Y, Lin Z, Yang CJ. Integration of target responsive hydrogel with cascaded enzymatic reactions and microfluidic paper-based analytic devices (µPADs) for point-of-care testing (POCT). Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;77:537–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Huang Y, Fang L, Zhu Z, Ma Y, Zhou L, Chen X, Xu D, Yang C. Design and synthesis of target-responsive hydrogel for portable visual quantitative detection of uranium with a microfluidic distance-based readout device. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;85:496–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Zhao M, Wang P, Guo Y, Wang L, Luo F, Qiu B, Guo L, Su X, Lin Z, Chen G. Detection of aflatoxin B(1) in food samples based on target-responsive aptamer-cross-linked hydrogel using a handheld pH meter as readout. Talanta. 2018;176:34–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Kim HS, Abbas N, Shin S. A rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 using DNA hydrogel formation on microfluidic pores. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;177: 113005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  167. Jiang C, Li Y, Wang H, Chen D, Wen Y. A portable visual capillary sensor based on functional DNA crosslinked hydrogel for point-of-care detection of lead ion. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2020;307: 127625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2020-JCJQ-JJ-358, 2018YFC1603500, 2019GGRC03, 2019CXTD03) for funding this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MC: Writing-original draft. YW: Writing-review and editing. JZ: Resources. YP: Data curation. SL, DH, SR: Figure processing. KQ, SL: Visualization. ZG: Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhixian Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, J. et al. Stimuli-responsive DNA-based hydrogels for biosensing applications. J Nanobiotechnol 20, 40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01242-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01242-x

Keywords