Skip to main content

Application of MOF-based nanotherapeutics in light-mediated cancer diagnosis and therapy

Abstract

Light-mediated nanotherapeutics have recently emerged as promising strategies to precisely control the activation of therapeutic reagents and imaging probe both in vitro and in vivo, largely ascribed to their unique properties, including minimally invasive capabilities and high spatiotemporal resolution. Nanoscale metal–organic frameworks (NMOFs), a new family of hybrid materials consisting of metal attachment sites and bridging ligands, have been explored as a new platform for enhanced cancer diagnosis and therapy due to their tunable size, modifiable surface, good biocompatibility, high agent loading and, most significantly, their ability to be preferentially deposited in tumors through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR). Especially the light-driven NMOF-based therapeutic platform, which not only allow for increased laser penetration depth and enhanced targeting, but also enable imaging-guided or combined treatments. This review provides up-to-date developments of NMOF-based therapeutic platforms for cancer treatment with emphasis on light-triggered therapeutic strategies and introduces their advances in cancer diagnosis and therapy in recent years.

Graphic Abstract

Background

Cancer is one of the main threats to human health. Traditional tumor treatments are not ideal due to their toxicity and side effects, which will seriously affect patient compliance and survival [1,2,3,4]. How to innovate treatment methods improve drug therapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects has always been the important topics in life science. Light-mediated treatment has attracted increasing research interest in the field of cancer treatment due to its advantages of being less invasive, well-controlled, less toxic side effects and significant therapeutic effects [5]. For example: (1) photosensitizers can be selectively concentrated at the cancerous site through passive or active targeting, effectively improving treatment efficiency; (2) the use of laser-activated therapy can effectively carry out specific treatment, targeting only the lesion site while avoiding causing damage to normal tissues; and (3) non-invasive and low impact on the body. To date, therapeutic strategies employing light as a remote-control tool have received considerable attention for their specific selectivity and spatiotemporal precision.

The fusion of light functions with nanomaterials to fabricate light-mediated nanotherapeutic agents for cancer diagnosis and therapy has shown a great prospect in precision medicine, such as quantum dots, mesoporous silica, metal oxides, upconversion materials and so on [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, these nanomaterials are usually non-biodegradable and have the potential for long-term toxicity. Therefore, the design of nanomaterial-based novel nanomedicines with high phototherapeutic efficiency still remains challenging [13,14,15]. Nanoscale metal–organic frameworks (NMOFs) constructed of metal-containing inorganic units and organic multi-complex linkers through coordination interactions [16,17,18]. Because of their excellent drug loading capacity, adjustability of the component units and good biocompatibility, NMOFs show great potential in the field of biomedicine and have been widely utilized. The tunability of NMOF components (e.g., ligands and metal nodes) facilitates the introduction of therapeutic modules for tumor treatment; the high porosity of NMOF provides a nanoplatform for the storage and delivery of various drugs, thus allowing the integration of multiple therapeutic modalities; and the functionalization of NMOF allows the enrichment of tumor tissues by active or passive targeting, thereby enabling tumor-targeted therapy. Based on these advantages, NMOFs-based cancer therapeutic nanodrugs are emerging as a new class of cancer treatment strategies [19,20,21].

Recent years witness that the enormous MOFs and their modifications leads to a concept of customized materials: that is, materials with functions tailored to specific applications, such as anticancer therapy. Therapeutic or therapeutic nanomedicine is an emerging concept where the same vehicle is both a therapeutic and an imaging (diagnostic) agent; and this is where MOFs are also seen as a promising platform [22,23,24]. This review summarizes the recent applications of photo-functionalized MOF nanotherapeutics in cancer diagnosis and treatment (Fig. 1). First, the general photophysical processes of light-mediated MOF-based nanotherapeutics for biomedicine-available considerations are briefly summarized. Then, NMOFs as phototherapeutic agents for cancer diagnosis and therapy are discussed. It is also briefly described that various light-mediated therapeutic mechanisms in relation to their structure-performance. Furthermore, the promise and several key issues of this field are indicated, that we hope will stimulate more interest in investigating the potential of MOF-based therapeutics for clinical applications.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Main scope of this perspective regarding the use of MOF-based nanotherapeutics for light-mediated cancer diagnosis and therapy

Light-mediated process of MOF-based therapeutics

Light-mediated treatment is mainly achieved by using specific wavelengths of laser light to irradiate phototherapeutic agent materials to selectively damage cancer cells and achieve tumor treatment effects [25,26,27]. The luminescent characteristics of MOFs make them an important sub-category of MOFs in which photon emission happens initiated by the absorption of radiative excitation energy [28].

The photophysical process of MOF-based nanotherapeutics is shown in Fig. 2. The energy in the absorption process is light and the pathway of relaxation from the excited states accompanying the emission of photons [6]. The photosensitizer (PS) absorbs photons and excites the electrons from the PS ground state (S0) to the higher energy PS excited singlet state (S1), where the excited electrons end up at the vibrational energy level of S1 and are rapidly relaxed by internal conversion to the lowest vibrational energy level of the PS excited state [24, 29, 30]. During this process, the electron returns to the ground state through three main processes: fluorescence, vibrational relaxation and inter-system scramble followed by phosphorescence, where fluorescence and phosphorescence can be used for cancer sensing and imaging. For the non-radiative transient process, the excited electrons from the PS-excited S1 to an equivalent vibrational level in the PS-excited triplet state (T1) by a change in electron spin orientation. After rapid vibrational relaxation within the T1 high energy level, the PS molecule decays to the ground state by emitting phosphorescence. In the presence of a triplet state molecule near the base, especially molecular oxygen, the triplet state of PS may relax by triggering photochemical reactions drives reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are highly toxic to cells [31]. In addition, depending on the type of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are cytotoxic, two pathways can be distinguished: type I generates superoxide anion radicals (O2·−) and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) due to hydrogen extraction or electron transfer between the PS-excited triplet state and adjacent organic or oxygen molecules in the cellular microenvironment, while type II generates singlet state oxygen (1O2), where hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radicals and oxygen readily diffuse through the cell membrane, leading to further cellular damage [32,33,34].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic diagrams of the photophysical processes of MOF-based optical nanotherapeutics

MOF-based nanotherapeutics for light-mediated cancer diagnosis

Luminescent characteristics together with size/shape selective properties of NMOFs facilitated the diagnosis of various diseases [35,36,37]. MOFs-based nanotherapeutics can be enriched at the tumor site for passive targeting through the high permeability and retention effects of solid tumors, or actively targeted through binding to tumor-specific receptors, thereby increasing the effective enrichment of imaging agents at the tumor site and enhancing the imaging effect [38]. NMOFs have many advantages and have proven to be outstanding contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), optical imaging, and photoacoustic imaging (PAI), all of which are useful techniques for clinical diagnosis due to their large number of metal attachment points or nodes (Table 1).

Table 1 Various MOF-based nanotherapeutics for cancer diagnosis

MRI

As a powerful non-invasive imaging technique, MRI contrast agents facilitate optimal tumor assessment by shortening the longitudinal (T1) relaxation rate of water protons and/or reducing the transverse (T2) relaxation rate to enhance MRI through positive and negative contrast agents [39].

Generally, paramagnetic metal ions (Gd3+ and Mn2+) are used to construct T1 contrast agents for MRI by chelating structures to reduce serious side effects [40]. In contrast, superparamagnetic iron oxides (SPIOs), which may lead to negative image enhancement, were chosen to construct T2-weighted MRI contrast agents. Therefore, NMOFs based on these metal ions are ideal materials for constructing MRI contrast agents [41, 42]. Early in 2006, Lin et al. reported Gd-based NMOFs as T1 contrast agents for MRI, namely Gd(BDC)1.5(H2O)2, with a longitudinal relaxation rate of of 35.8 s−1 per mm Gd3+, significantly higher than that of commercial T1 contrast agents [43]. Yin groups acquired a kind of nanomaterial that remained stable at 160 to 300 °C based on Gd3+ and Ru(II)[4,4′-(COOH)2 bipyridyl (bpy)]3·Cl2 (LRu) precursors and used for MRI, namely Gd-Ru [44]. Compared with the commercial MRI contrast agent Gd-DTPA (DTPA, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), Gd-Ru obtained a higher MRI contrast efficiency. Despite the fact that Gd3+-based NMOFs have shown good MRI capabilities, the toxicity of leached Gd3+ ions preclude the clinical application of these NMOFs, leading researchers to look for other metal-based MOFs for MRI. Such as, Lin and coworkers constructed Mn2+-based NMOF systems for MRI as the oral LD50 of Mn is 1.5 g kg–1 [45]. Despite the less outstanding performance of the Mn2+-based NMOF for T1 imaging, however, they provided an effective carrier for delivering large doses of Mn2+ ions result in excellent MRI both in vivo and in vitro. Liu and coworkers fabricated Mn2+-based MOFs with a near-infrared (NIR) dye as organic linkers, in which Mn2+ offers strong contrast in T1-weighted MRI [46]. The biotoxicity and biocompatibility of Mn2+-based MOFs were evaluated by using the standard MTT assays, which showed that Mn2+-based MOFs did not exhibit significant toxic effects on 293T cells, A549 cells, HeLa cells, and 4T1 cells after incubation for 24 or 48 h even with a high concentration up to 200 mg/mL. Recently, Zhang et al. reported a tumor microenvironment-responsive NMOFs system based on Mn3+ and tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin (TCPP) (Fig. 3a) [47]. After endocytosis of the particles into tumor cells, the NMOFs were broken down by intracellular glutathione into Mn2+ and free TCPP, resulting in Mn2+-based MRI and TCPP-based fluorescence (FL) imaging (Fig. 3b and c). Furthermore, the marked differences in cell viability suggest that there are differences in the tolerance and sensitivity of various cells to GSH depletion. Of particular note, MOF-treated tumor cells (CT26, 4T1 and B16) had a lower survival rate compared to normal cells (3T3), suggesting that MOF has a tumor-specific killing effect, while avoiding toxicity to normal cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Synthetic schematic and SEM photograph of Mn3+-TCPP NMOF; b mechanism of Mn3+-TCPP NMOF unlocking triggered by GSH; c in vivo fluorescence (left) and MRI (right) signals after intravenous injection with Mn3+-TCPP NMOF. Reproduced with permission [47]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society

Fe-based MOFs (Fe-MOFs) contrast agents are more common than Gd-based and Mn-based MOFs for T2-weighted MRI (oral LD50 of Fe is 30 g kg–1) [48]. Gref et al. have designed a series of Fe-MOFs (MIL-53, MIL-88A, MIL-89, MIL-100 and MIL-101-NH2 for MRI and drug delivery, demonstrating excellent therapeutic results [49]. Chen groups have synthesized bilayer NMOFs (d-MOFs) with a core–shell structure using prussian blue (PB) as the core and Fe-MIL-100 as the shell. The nanoparticles can be used for T1 and T2 dual-mode for MRI due to the presence of internal PB and external MIL-100 [50]. Zeng’s group grew MIL-101-NH2 on the surface of Au nanopillars and further modified the targeting peptide ZD2 to obtain an Au containing NS@MOF-ZD2 core–shell structure that can target triple-negative breast cancer [51]. Cell viability of MDA-MB-231 cells incubated with different concentrations of Au containing NS@MOF-ZD2 and the in vivo toxicity on the major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) of mice proved their safe. This core–shell structure had better T1-weighted MRI, which could be attributed to the high spin of the five unpaired electrons of Fe3+ in this system and the active inner layer relaxation of Fe3+ after coordination with water. Zheng et al. encapsulated FePt nanoparticle into MIL-101(Fe) to obtained face-centered cubic FePt-MOFs-tLyp-1 with structural integrity at neutral pH levels (i.e., the bloodstream) for eradicate cancer cells (Fig. 4a). Cell viability test showed that the MIL-101(Fe)-tLyp-1 presented no significant cytotoxicity to tLyp-1 receptor-negative tumor cells (A549) and normal cells (BRL-3A). In addition, the as-prepared multifunctional FePt-MOF serve as a nanotheranostic agent for MRI/CT dual-modal imaging based on superparamagnetism (Fig. 4b and c) [52, 53].

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Fabrication Process and TEM photograph of FePt-MOFs-tLyp-1; b in vivo T2-weighted MR imaging (axial plane) of a 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse at different time intervals after an intravenous injection with FePt-MOF-tLyp-1; c in vivo CT imaging (axial plane) of a 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse at different time intervals after intravenous injection with FePt-MOF-tLyp-1. Tumor tissue was indicated with red pan. Reproduced with permission [53]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society

In addition to Fe3+ ion, MRI can also be achieved by constructing composite structures of MOFs and Fe3O4. Other Fe-based MOFs, such as Fe-MIL-53 carrying chemotherapeutics or oligonucleotides, have been tested as MRI contrast agents [54]. Yang et al. constructed a core–shell structure using Fe3O4 as the core and UiO-66 as the shell, followed by the modification of columnar aromatics on the surface as regulatory valves on the surface to achieve MRI-guided chemotherapy with sustained release of drugs triggered by the tumor microenvironment [55]. The as-prepared core–shell nanomaterials showed negligible cytotoxicity to normal Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells and Hela cells, with cell viability of almost 100% and 85% even at a high concentration of 100 µg mL−1. In another study, Sahu et al. demonstrated the development of a new magnetic porous system consisting of Fe3O4 core covered by a shell of IRMOF-3 with nontoxic towards HeLa cells and murine fibroblast (NIH3T3) cells for MRI [56]. The nano-agent was further modified by conjugation of a cancer targeting ligand (FA) and a fluorescent molecule (RhB). Following loading with the anticancer chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel, NMOFs showed good therapeutic effects in HeLa cells through hydrophobic effects, high internalization through receptor-mediated endocytosis and strong T2-weighted MRI contrast due to high amounts of MRI-active Fe3O4 nanoparticles.

X-ray CT imaging

CT, a type of tomographic imaging, is a 3D visualization of the internal structure of a scanned object depending on the absorption and transmission of X-ray [57]. In CT imaging, high atomic number elements (high Z elements) with strong X-ray attenuation properties are often used as contrast agents in order to increase the contrast between the target tissue and the adjacent tissue. Especially X-ray scintillation MOFs constructed from high atomic number metal cluster nodes (Z = 72 for Hf and Z = 40 for Zr), where the Hf(IV) and Zr(IV) cations act as antennas by absorbing X-ray photons and converting them to fast electrons by the photoelectric effect. The generated electrons scintillate/excite multiple anthracene-based optical emitters in the MOF through inelastic scattering, leading to efficient generation of detectable photons in the visible spectrum. Most importantly, NMOFs have the ability to preferentially deposit in tumors by enhancing permeability and retention (EPR) effect [58]. Large amounts of high Z elements can be easily incorporated into MOFs with extremely high payloads to form CT contrast agents. For example, the ability of two NMOFs as CT contrast agents, namely Zr-UiO and Hf-UiO, in which metal loading up to 37 wt% to Zr and 57 wt% to Hf, were demonstrated by Lin and co-works [59]. Xie et al. prepared a UiO-PDT nanosystem containing iodine-boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) dyes by ligand exchange [60]. The low toxicity and good biocompatibility of UiO-PDT allow it to be administered in animals without significant side effects, even at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Moreover, UiO-PDT could be enriched at the tumor site and produced optimal CT imaging after approximately 24 h of intravenous injection. Liu groups prepared core–shell NMOFs by combining IR825 with Mn2+ and Hf4+ to form multimodal imaging agents [61]. In the NMOF, each substance has its own function. Mn2+ ion, high-Z element Hf4+ ion, and the ligand IR825 are used as MRI contrast agents, enhance CT signal and radiation sensitivity, and as photothermal agents, respectively.

In addition to the addition of high Z elements to the MOFs backbone, NMOFs can be combined with other nanoparticles (e.g. gold nanorods) to obtain CT imaging capabilities [62]. Such as, the Au@MIL-88(Fe) composite system with CT, MRI and photoacoustic (PAI) tri-modal imaging capabilities was obtained by Tian group (Fig. 5a and b) [63]. Cell viability of U87MG cells was greater than 90% indicating that the as-prepared Au@MIL-88(Fe) exerted negligible cytotoxicity even at high concentrations (400 × 10−9 M). Moreover, the Au@MIL-88(Fe) nano-system can significantly improve the sensitivity, depth, and spatial resolution of glioma imaging and the effect of all three modalities has been demonstrated by in vitro and in vivo experiments. As can be seen from these latter examples, the addition of nanoparticles to MOF to make it intrinsically magnetically active metal is an attractive alternative, but this solution has additional components on top of MOF synthesis as well as synthesis steps, which may then complicate the large-scale manufacture of any MOF-based clinical CT contrast agent.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Fabrication process and TEM photograph of Au@MIL-88(Fe); b application to multimodality imaging-based tumor diagnosis. Reproduced with permission [63]. Copyright 2016, Wiley

X-ray PET

PET, another X-ray functional imaging method, relies on the aggregation of the substance that was labeled with a short-lived radionuclide in the metabolism for diagnostic purposes [64]. Differs from other imaging methods, PET imaging has better detection sensitivity and stronger signal penetration. NMOFs with positron imaging radioisotopes are suitable choices for this technique [65,66,67]. Hong groups developed intrinsically radioactive UiO-66 in which 89Zr as secondary building units (SBUs) was used for PET after functionalized by pyrene-derived polyethylene glycol [68]. 89Zr-UiO-66/Py–PGA-PEG-F3 demonstrated strong radiochemical and material stability in various biological media and PET scans traced the organ distribution of 89Zr-UiO-66/Py–PGA-PEG-F3 in vivo and detected an 8.2 ± 0.3% total injected dose per gram of tumor after intravenous injection for 2 h. Over 99.99% of 89Zr was found to remain intact after incubation of 89Zr-UiO-66/Py-PGA-PEG-F3 with whole mouse serum for 120 h. Based on the higher half-life of 89Zr (78 h) in comparison to the traditionally used 19F (2 h), these Zr-based PET agents have the possibility for relatively long-term use. Another example MOF-based PET was given by Liu et al., they designed a PET imaging agent by self-assembly of 64Cu radio-labelled and DOX loaded amorphous ZIF-8 through a rapid one-pot aqueous approach (oral LD50 = 350 μg kg–1 for Zn, 25 g kg–1 for Cu) [69]. Experimental results indicated that the rate of intracellular drug release increased with decreasing size (Fig. 6a). PET imaging showed that smaller MOF nanoparticles (60 nm) circulated in the bloodstream for a longer period of time and provided higher anti-tumor efficacy than the larger MOF (130 nm) which obtained more than 50% tumor accumulation (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Size-controlled TEM images and the DOX fluorescence intensity in nucleus decreased with the increasing size of DOX@AZIF-8; b DOX@AZIF-8 of different sizes exhibited significant difference in the tumor accumulation and anticancer efficacy. Reproduced with permission [69]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society

Optical imaging

Optical imaging is an imaging modality based on the detection of emitted or diffused photons after illumination with visible or near-infrared light to obtain images of cells, tissues or organs with high sensitivity and ultra-low invasiveness [70,71,72]. Zhang groups reported the use of Zr-based porphyrin NMOF, namely Zr-NMOF, for imaging-guided cancer therapy (oral LD50 = 4.1 g kg–1 for Zr) [73]. Zr-NMOF can emit fluorescent signals under 530 nm laser excitation and have demonstrated excellent imaging capabilities with high signal-to-noise ratios in both in vivo and ex vivo experiments. For optical imaging, the depth of light penetration is the main issue limiting its clinical application. Near infrared (NIR) dyes have the advantage of deep excitation light penetration and low autofluorescence and can be used to overcome the limitations of light penetration in FL imaging [74,75,76]. Foucault-Collet et al. reported a NIR imaging strategy based on MOFs, namely nano-Yb-PVDC-3, doped with lanthanides (Yb) and sensitizers that could be endocytosed and enable real-time NIR imaging of living cells [77]. Moreover, this work proven that MOFs materials could significantly improve the efficiency of real-time cellular imaging with rare earth elements.

Associating MOFs with fluorescent dyes, PSs or fluorescent drugs is an effective way to broaden the spectral range of MOFs [78]. In addition, this strategy is also very effective in preventing aggregation-induced quenching and achieving consistent luminescence characteristics under harsh conditions through the confinement effect within the pores of the MOFs, thus improving the photoluminescence performance and efficiency of the fluorescent species [79]. As an example, Liu group demonstrated the incorporation of Rhodamine B (RhB) that serves as a fluorescent imaging agent within the framework of MIL-53(Al)-NH2 by a one-step approach when using RhB as aqueous solution [80]. The acquired red fluorescent NMOFs were applied for in vitro imaging of mouse gastric cancer 803 (MGC-803) cells and human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMC), and permitted in vivo imaging of thymus-free nude mice with good stability, biocompatibility and high imaging efficiency, avoiding interference from autofluorescence. In addition, the as-synthesized fluorescent NMOFs were successfully used as nanocarriers to simultaneously load the large molecule drug tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) and the small molecule anti-cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with high loading efficiency and were delivered into cells. Liu et al. used MOF-199-loaded PSs wrapped around the nanoparticle surface using pozzolanium127 to obtain a therapeutically integrated nanoplatform (PS@MOF-199) [81]. The loaded PSs can perform photodynamic therapy (PDT) while giving the nanoplatform the ability to perform FL imaging. Once the nanoplatform is taken up by tumor cells, the glutathione in the tumor can disintegrate the backbone of the MOFs, releasing the PSs into contact with oxygen to perform PDT under laser irradiation, while the consumption of glutathione can further enhance the effect of PDT. Thus, this system allows for FL-guided enhanced PDT. Due to the mitochondrial membrane potential in living cells and triphenylphosphonium (TPP) is a lipophilic cation that accumulates in mito chondria. Fairen-Jimenez et al. utilized the pore characteristics of UiO-66 nanoparticles to load the anticancer drug dichloroacetate (DCA) and then surface functionalized with a TPP targeting unit (Fig. 7a) [82]. They reported that MCF-7 human breast cancer cells demonstrated changes in mitochondrial morphology when it treated with the targeted MOF system, cal-TPP@(DCA5-UiO-66), the elongated reticular network of mitochondria became short, balloon-shaped and fragmented, this is the result of DCA toxicity. In contrast, the control non-targeted cal@(DCA5-UiO-66) which showed still partially stringy and reticular morphology. For the manifestation of MOF in the cells, the green fluorescence of calcein can be determined (Fig. 7b).

Fig. 7
figure 7

a Structure of UiO-66 and SEM images of synthesized DCA2.5-UiO-66 and TPP@(DCA2.5-UiO-66) samples; b images of untreated cells and cells treated with cal@(DCA5-UiO-66) and cal-TPP@(DCA5-UiO-66) for 8 h; mitochondria are colored in red, MOFs in green, and nuclei in blue; white arrows indicate stringy mitochondria. Reproduced with permission [82]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society

Non-fluorescent reagents, including up-conversion materials and persistent luminescence (PersL) NPs, are also effectively for optical imaging by incorporating them into the MOF. By a two-step method, Deng et al. obtained core–shell nanocarriers UCNPs@MOF-DOX-AS1411 based on the mesoporous MIL-100 (Fe) shell and up-conversion luminescent NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ NPs core (Fig. 8a) [83]. The obtained nanocarriers exhibit a unique up-conversion green emission under laser excitation at 980 nm, providing UCNPs@MOF-DOX-AS1411 with the possibility of optical imaging of biological probes in vivo (Fig. 8b). The cytotoxicity of the obtained nanocarriers were evaluated by incubated with 293 cells and the standard MTT assay. At different concentration ranges, over 94% cells viabilities were observed, indicating that UCNPs@MOF NCs had no significant cytotoxic effects at all doses. Also capping upconversion NPs in MOFs, Sahu group synthesized core–shell nanoplatforms (UCNPs@ZIF-8/FA) encapsulated with FA for targeting, fluorescent imaging and pH-responsive drug release by a one-post method [84]. In this study, ZIF-8 wrapped around FA was directly encapsulated on UCNPs (NaYF4: Er3+, Yb3+) to form a monodisperse nanocomposite, in which up-conversion particles as optical imaging elements and had higher resolution images. PersL is a distinct optical phenomenon in which light can persist for hours or seconds after leaving the excitation source and the principle of optical imaging using this light is different from that of fluorescence or phosphorescence [85, 86]. Particularly, NIR PersL NPs have intrigued researchers because they can serve as optical probes bioimaging systems with preponderances of low irradiation damage, auto-fluorescence-free, and deep tissue penetration. Recently, Lv’s group obtained a multifunctional nanoplatform, ZGGO@ZIF-8-DOX, with Cr-doped zinc gallogermanate (ZGGO) NIR PersL NPs as the core and ZIF-8 as the shell with dual functionalities for auto-fluorescence-free NIR PersL imaging and the pH-responsive drug delivery, thus it has great potential in tumor theranostics (Fig. 8c) [87]. The cytotoxicity of ZGGO@ZIF-8 NPs were evaluated by incubated with murine breast cancer (4T1) cells and the standard MTT assay. After 24 h incubation with ZGGO@ZIF-8, the cell viability maintained over 85% indicated the ZGGO@ZIF-8 NPs possessed low toxicity and good biocompatibility in cells (Fig. 8d). The imaging mechanism in ZGGO NP was attributed to the 2E → 4A2 transition of Cr3+ (Fig. 8e). Compared to other imaging methods, this platform offers higher resolution and deeper tissue penetration. However, the integration of PersL NPs and MOF was currently in infancy.

Fig. 8
figure 8

a Fabrication process and TEM photograph of UCNPs@MOF-DOX-AS1411; b images of 293 cells and MCF-7 cells incubated with UCNPs@MOF-DOX-AS1411 NCs for 1 h; c fabrication process and TEM photograph of ZGGO@ZIF-8-DOX; d in vivo NIR PersL imaging in a mouse was radiated 254 nm and 661 nm treated with ZGGO@ZIF-8 (0.2 mL, 1 mg/mL in PBS); e energy-level diagram for Cr3+-activated ZGGO. Reproduced with permission [83]. Copyright 2015, Springer Nature; [87]; Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society

In addition to the above methods, NMOFs can also be used to covalently link fluorescent molecules with functional groups of ligands for FL imaging purposes [88]. NMOFs were then covalently linked to polyethylene glycol (PEG) and folic acid (FA) by covalently linking the amino functional groups on the surface of the MOFs with carboxyl functional groups to increase the active targeting ability of the nanoparticles. The amino groups on the surface of the MOFs are then covalently linked to the carboxy-functional capped PEG and FA to increase the active targeting ability of the nanoparticles. The nanoplatform (BQ-MIL@cat-fMIL) can be used not only to monitor the enrichment of material at the tumor site by in vivo FL imaging prior to treatment, but also to reflect the change in fluorescence intensity of the tumor tissue after treatment. The successful construction of BQ-MIL@cat-fMIL also demonstrates the unique advantages of NMOFs in building a multifunctional treatment platform.

In summary, these examples of luminescent MOFs and composites highlight the wide range of strategies that can be used to prepare bioimaging materials. The use of intrinsically luminescent linkers, such as porphyrins, is highly attractive due to their simplicity, but many organic fluorophores do not possess the highly symmetrical structures that are often required for the synthesis of ordered porous MOFs. Similarly, the coordination chemistry of lanthanides, subject to steric factors, often leads to denser structures with limited porosity. Therefore, for imaging and drug delivery binding, post-synthesis binding to fluorophores or hybridization is often the more favorable approach.

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI)

PAI is a new non-invasive and non-ionizing biomedical imaging method that has been developed in recent years. When a pulsed laser is irradiated into a biological tissue, an ultrasound signal will be generated in the light absorption domain of the tissue, and this ultrasound signal generated by light excitation is called a photoacoustic signal [89,90,91]. PAI combines the advantages of high selectivity in pure optical tissue imaging and deep penetration in pure ultrasound tissue imaging, resulting in high resolution and high contrast tissue images, and in principle bypassing the effects of light scattering and breaking through the “soft limit” of high-resolution optical imaging [92, 93].

High porosity, abundant metal sites and host molecule loading capacity allow NMOFs to be designed as efficient PAI contrast agents. As an example, Chen’s group obtained a multifunctional MOF nanoplatform for PAI-guided chemotherapy/photothermal synchronous tumor therapy based on MIL-100(Fe) [94]. PAI contrast with photothermal conversion property were achieved by coating a curcumin Fe-based MOF with polydopamine (PDA) to enhance the colloidal stability and biocompatibility. By modifying with hyaluronic acid (HA)-conjugated PDA, the resulting nanoplatform were further functionalized to specifically target CD44 overexpressing tumor cells. The experimental results showed significant accumulation of the nanoparticles at the tumor site and enabled PAI-guided combined chemotherapy/photothermal treatment with high efficacy. Yang et al. employed a one-step method to obtain ZIF-8-derived carbon nanoparticles for PAI-guided cancer phototherapy, and investigated the effect of nanoparticle size on the comparative ability of phototherapy and PAI [95]. The result nano-system can act as a photothermal and PSs agents to generate both heat and ROS. In vivo PAI monitoring has shown that the system can induce efficient tumor ablation under NIR laser irradiation. Furthermore, the increase in nanoparticle size provides more phototherapeutic effect and PAI signal intensity. Subsequently, a new metal–organic nanotherapeutic agent (Cu-THQNPs) was constructed by Yuan et al. though using organic dyes, tetrahydroxyanthraquinone (THQ), as linker coordinated with Cu2+ ions, that serving as dual-mode therapeutics for PAI-guided photothermal/chemotherapy in the NIR II window (1000 to 1350 nm of the optical spectrum) (Fig. 9a) [96]. After PEG modification, Cu-THQNPs achieve good biocompatibility and colloidal stability. Their strong absorption in the NIR II window and PET enable Cu-THQNPs to act as excellent photothermal agents with a high photothermal conversion efficiency (51.3%) at 1064 nm and also as excellent PAI contrast agents (Fig. 9b). Additionally, acidic cleavage of tumor-specific coordination bonds allows degradation of the Cu-THQNPs leading to the release of Cu2+ into the tumor region, enhancing anti-tumor activity by catalyzing H2O2 to ·OH (Fig. 9c). Another study obtained PAI contrast agents (AuNR@-ZIF-8) with high PAI capacity and biocompatibility by combining ZIF-8 with AuNRs [97]. AuNR@ZIF-8 core–shell nanocomposites were successfully constructed by a simple step-by-step synthetic method involving the attachment of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to the surface of AuNR and the subsequent growth of ZIF-8 on the AuNR. The generated AuNR@ZIF-8 nano-agent exhibit high NIR absorbance, good photothermal conversion and PAI efficiency due to the presence of the AuNR.

Fig. 9
figure 9

a Synthesis procedure and TEM image of Cu-THQNPs; b photoenergy to heat conversion mechanism of Cu-THQNPs; c schematic diagram of the behavior of Cu-THQNPs upon the 1064 nm laser irradiation in vivo. Reproduced with permission [96]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society

Multi-modal imaging

Mono-modality imaging, such as FL imaging has high sensitivity but limited penetration depth; MRI has excellent 3D soft tissue detail imaging, but its limited planar resolution and low sensitivity are not suitable for cellular level imaging; CT imaging has high resolution, but its sensitivity to soft tissue is low [98, 99]. Thus, monomodal imaging provides a limited diagnostic basis and does not reflect the full range of pathological information, thus severely undermining the effectiveness of imaging techniques in cancer diagnosis. The shortcomings of a single imaging modality can be overcome by integrating multiple imaging modalities to provide more detailed and reliable information for cancer diagnosis, which is particularly important for the accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of cancer. Due to the versatile nature of NMOFs, combining different imaging modalities on the same NMOFs platform is relatively easy to achieve.

Tang et al. obtained core–shell nanocomposites for upconversion luminescence (UCL) and MRI dual-mode imaging by growing MOFs (MIL-101(Fe)) as a shell on surface of UCNPs [100]. Particularly, the UCNPs can be used for UCL, while MIL-101(Fe) has MRI capabilities. In vivo UCL imaging and T2-weighted MRI studies have shown that the nanomaterials can be effectively enriched in tumor sites 24 h after intravenous injection and have good UCL/MRI capabilities. Also exploiting the MRI capability of Fe-based MOFs, Chen et al. encapsulated the fluorescent molecule indocyanine green (ICG) in MIL-100(Fe) obtained MIL-100(Fe)@HA@ICG system, making the system capable of both FL imaging and photothermal ablation therapy (PAT) [101]. The MIL-100(Fe)@HA@ICG system allows for tri-modal MRI/PAI/FL imaging, overcoming the problems of penetration depth or sensitivity that exist with a single imaging modality. Kuang et al. used ZIF-8 as a framework for the simultaneous encapsulation of Ag2S, Ag2Se and UCNPs, and further integrated Au nanorods to obtain a multifunctional heterodimer based on ZIF-8 and multiple nanoparticles [102]. Under NIR excitation, Ag2S and Ag2Se can emit fluorescence at 920 nm and 1300 nm, while UCNPs can absorb light at 980 nm and emit fluorescence at 500–700 nm. High fluorescence signal expression can be observed at the tumor site even 24 h after injection of the material. At the same time, Au nanorods can be used for CT and PAI, providing high spatial resolution and high tissue penetration for tumor diagnosis. Recently, Xiong et al. designed multifunctional Bi2S3/FeS2@BSA-FA NHs for CT and MRI-guided tumour-targeted photothermal therapy [103]. The authors used a biomimetic mineralisation method to prepare Bi2S3/FeS2@BSA composites with excellent biocompatibility, which were further modified by FA to give the material active targeting capabilities (Fig. 10a). In this system, Bi2S3 and FeS2 provide CT and MRI functions respectively, with a high X-ray absorption coefficient of 8.02 HU-mM-1 and a transverse relative coefficient (53.9 mM−1 s−1). In vivo CT and MRI show good imaging results and the two imaging modalities complement each other to allow a fuller analysis of the tumor site (Fig. 10b).

Fig. 10
figure 10

a The one-pot synthesis process of Bi2S3/FeS2@BSA-FA; b Schematic illustration of Bi2S3/FeS2@BSA-FA for MR/CT imaging and PTT. Reproduced with permission [103]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier

In general, MOFs are being extensively studied as very prospective imaging agents, primarily owing to the versatility of their synthesis and the potential to integrate imaging with drug delivery. Imaging features can be inherent structural components of the MOF or guests incorporated into the pore or particle surface, either during or after synthesis, and the MOF can be readily hybridized with an array of other nanomaterials. It is this versatility that means that multiple imaging features can also be easily packed into a single particle, resulting in a multi-modal imaging agent.

MOF-based nanotherapeutics for light-mediated cancer therapy

Tunable structure, functional capabilities, biocompatibility and biodegradability of NMOFs make them a promising platform for cancer therapy [104, 105]. For example, the specific functions of MOFs can be achieved by rational design of organic linkers, metal clusters and topologies; the performance for therapeutic application of MOFs can be tuned and improved by rational modification of the structure; the porous nature of MOFs facilitates encapsulation of therapeutic reagents to enable combination therapy. Particularly, NMOFs can be preferentially deposited in tumors by increasing permeability and EPR effects. Moreover, the incorporation of PSs into NMOFs not only tackles the binding issues of PSs, including aggregation, self-quenching and uncontrollability in vivo, but also improves loading efficiency, stability and reduces cytotoxicity. Currently, the use of light-mediated MOFs for cancer treatment is focused on photothermal therapy (PTT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), chemodynamic therapy (CDT) and so on (Table 2).

Table 2 Various MOF-based phototherapeutic agents for cancer therapy

Photothermal therapy (PTT)

PTT is a treatment that uses a material which absorbs light with high photothermal conversion efficiency, injects the material into the body and irradiates it externally with light, and the material converts the light energy into heat to kill cancer cells [106]. The main mechanisms involved in PTT at the research stage are: energy transfer to the surrounding lattice in the form of atomic collisions: i.e. radiation-free relaxation processes; local surface plasma excitonic resonance effects caused by free carriers; and non-radiative compounding of excited electrons with holes through deep defects: i.e. phonon intense lattice vibrations [107,108,109,110]. In the PTT-mediated procedure, the photothermal agent is usually injected into the patient, e.g. by intravenous injection, and aggregated into the tumor by means of a highly permeable long retention effect (EPR) or a bound targeting factor. There are three main types of MOF-based nanotherapeutic agents that use the PTT principle to treat cancer: (1) MOF nanotherapeutic agents; (2) MOF-derived nanotherapeutic agents; (3) MOF-coated photothermal agent nanocomposites.

MOF therapeutic agents

MOF nanotherapeutic agents which rely on their own photothermal conversion to achieve PTT. Such as, by self-assembly of NIR dye IR825 and Mn2+, a MOF nanoplatform with strong NIR absorbance and high MRI contrast performance was obtained by Liu group [46]. After modification with PDA and PEG, this nanoplatform not only exhibits excellent PTT efficiency with good NIR photostability and high MRI contrast performance compared to a single IR825 molecule, but also shows effective photothermal tumor ablation with minimal long-term toxicity. Subsequently, Yin’s group reported a first 3D perylenediimide (PDIs)-based MOF, namely Zr-PDI, composed of a N,N′-di-(4-benzoic acid)-1,2,6,7-tetrachloroperylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic acid diimide (P-2COOH) ligand and Zr63-O)43-OH)4 clusters (Fig. 11a) [111]. Zr-PDI has excellent stability and a specific surface area of 1330 m2/g. The high adsorption capacity of high boiling point amine vapors can generate highly stable anionic radicals Zr-PDI*− through PET. Zr-PDI*−, with NIR absorbance, in addition to high yield and stability, shows an exceptionally high NIR photothermal conversion efficiency (η = 52.3%) and good recyclability, which can be applied in the field of photothermal therapy (Fig. 11b and c).

Fig. 11
figure 11

a Synthesis procedure and structure of 3D porous Zr-PDI; b illustration of photothermal conversion performance of Zr-PDI*−; c schematic diagram of the PET process between TEA and Zr-PDI, excited state Zr-PDI* is reductively quenched by TEA to afford Zr-PDI*−. Reproduced with permission [111]. Copyright 2018, Springer Nature

MOF-derived nanotherapeutic agents

After different thermal and/or chemical treatments, MOFs can be used as sacrificial templates to derive various porous nanomaterials. For example, MOF-derived nanocarbons exhibit controllable porous architectures, pore volumes, and surface areas as well as high photothermal conversion efficiency. Zhao et al. reported an example of MOF-based carbon nanomaterial (ZnO-CNP-TRGL) for cancer therapy with NIR response and variable size by a subsequent annealing and sintering process under the condition of pre-synthesis of MOF, and then coated with a thermally responsive gel layer to obtain switching capability (Fig. 12a) [112]. Cytotoxicity assays showed that the cytocompatibility of MOF-based carbon nanomaterial increased with the increased particle sizes and reduced dosage when incubated with CCK-8 cells. Notably, the prepared carbon nanocomposites exhibited efficient photothermal conversion and rapid size transition from nanodispersions to micrometer aggregates under 808 nm NIR light irradiation, thus enabling the nanocomposites to generate large amounts of heat in the affected area and directly destroy proteins in tumor or bacterial cells (Fig. 12b and c).

Fig. 12
figure 12

a Synthesis procedure and TEM image of ZnO-CNP-TRGL; b Photothermal images for control media and ZnO-CNP-TRGL (25, 50, 100, and 1000 nm) suspensions (50 µg mL−1) with different irradiation times (0–5 min) at 2 W cm−2; c Illustration images for the size transformation of ZnO-CNP-TRGL from hydrophilic dispersion and hydrophobic micrometer aggregation; LCST is lower critical solution temperature. Reproduced with permission [112]. Copyright 2019, Wiley

MOF-coated nanocomposite photothermal agents

The therapeutic efficiency of PTT can be improved by encapsulating the photothermal agents (PTAs) in NMOFs to form a MOF-coated nanocomposite. Such as, organic dyes (ICG, IR825) with NIR absorption capability could be embedded into MOFs to formed nanocomposites to overcome poor solubility and low tumor specificity. By loading ICG into MIL-100 (Fe) and modifying with hyaluronic acid (HA), Chen’s group obtained a multifunctional nanoplatform, namely MIL-100@HA@ICG [94]. The toxicology of MOF@HA@ICG NPs was determined by incubating MCF-7 cancer cells with for 48 h. Cell survival rates of over 80% indicated that NPs had low cell cytotoxicity to MCF-7 cancer cells at NP concentrations that ranged from 0 to 250 μg/mL. Anti-tumor experiments indicate that MIL-100@HA@ICG can effectively inhibit the growth of MCF-7 tumors by improving NIR absorbance, photostability and tumor accumulation.

In addition to direct loading of PTAs, PTT can also be achieved by loading precursor compounds of PTAs with tumor microenvironmental responsiveness. As an example, Chen et al. obtained an AMP nano-agent by loading 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) into MIL-100 [113]. In vitro cytotoxicity assessment showed that AMP nano-agent exhibited negligible cytotoxicity to 4T1 cells in the absence of H2O2 and NIR laser irradiation. Then, the therapeutic properties of AMP nano-agent were tested in 4T1 tumour-bearing mice. The results show that in the tumor microenvironment, Fe3+ ions in AMP nano-agent can catalyze H2O2 to produce ·OH, and then ·OH can oxidate ABTS to oxidation state in the presence of PTT, enabling tumor microenvironment-responsive PTT and further improving the safety of PTT. In addition, the ·OH produced by this system can achieve a chemical kinetic killing effect on tumor tissue. Treatment experiments have shown that tumor tissue in vivo can be completely eliminated by AMP nanosystem.

Besides loading organic PTAs, another effective strategy to constructed MOF-based nanocomposites for PTT is integrating NMOFs with PTT functionality inorganic NPs. For example, by depositing ZIF-8 on Au star NPs, Lin’s group developed a yolk-shell structure of Au@ZIF-8, enabling bimodal imaging for diagnosis and chemotherapeutic treatment [114]. The group of the cells incubated with Au@MOF alone showed no significant cell apoptosis under the studied concentrations. The inherent localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) properties of Au have led to its use for NIR-II PTT and IR/PAI imaging. Furthermore, DOX was encapsulated in the cavity of the platform, which exhibited pH-controlled drug release because of the degradation of ZIF-8 in the acidic tumor microenvironment. Semiconductor CuS, which is inexpensive and has good photothermal effects, has attracted a lot of attention in PTT [115]. Chen et al. have obtained a new core–shell nanoplatform CuS@Fe-MOF based on a co-precipitation and assembly strategy (Fig. 13a). Higher than 85% cell viability reveals the low cytotoxicity of CuS@Fe-MOF after 24 h incubation HUVEC cells with CuS@Fe-MOF (0–0.3 g L−1). The integrated CuS containing nanoplatform exhibits high DOX loading capacity (27.5%), photothermal conversion efficiency (39.7%), pH-controlled drug delivery, MRI capability and good biocompatibility (Fig. 13b and c).

Fig. 13
figure 13

a Synthesis scheme and TEM image of CuS@Fe-MOF; b Scheme of PAT process; c Temperature elevation curves in the tumor site. Reproduced with permission [115]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier

Photodynamic therapy (PDT)

PDT is a non-invasive treatment that allows precise ablation of tumors. In cancer treatment, the PSs are usually enriched in the tumor tissue and the laser is then used to irradiate the tumor site to produce large amounts of ROS to kill the tumor cells [116]. The reactive species generated during the PDT process can kill cancer cells not only directly through apoptosis, necrosis or autophagy, but also indirectly kill cancer cells by destroying the tumor vascular system and causing tumor ischemia [117]. Moreover, PDT can trigger an immune response against tumor antigens, further inhibiting tumor growth and recurrence. In PDT process, there are three key factors, including light, PSs and oxygen. Local irradiation of the tumor site by laser after enrichment of PSs at the tumor site allows selective killing of tumor tissue and minimizes damage to healthy tissue. At present, a variety of MOF-based nanomaterials have been used in PDT due to their easy diffusion of ROS and the avoidance of self-quenching of PSs.

Porphyrins and their metal derivatives are commonly used as PSs in the PDT process [118]. However, these PSs still have certain drawbacks. For example, the PSs lacks targeting in vivo and its aggregation at the tumor site reduces the effectiveness of the treatment. MOFs constructed using organic ligands with porphyrin-containing structures largely overcome these problems by forming porous skeletal structures through the covalent binding of metal centers to ligands. Early in 2014, Lin et al. used a porphyrin derivative (5,15-di(p-benzoato)porphyrin, H2DBP) as a ligand and Hf as metal ions to obtain DBP-UiO with nanoplate morphology [119]. In this system, the DBP molecules are separated by metal nodes to avoid aggregation and quenching, and the coordination of the DPB molecules with Hf facilitates the energy transfer and hence the yield of ROS. The porous structure of the system also facilitates the diffusion of 1O2. Subsequently, the same group synthesized DBC-UiO, a more effective PDT, using 5,15-di(p-benzoato)-chlorin (H2DBC) as a ligand, with three times the efficiency of DBP-UiO in the production of 1O2 [120]. Zhou et al. used Zr as the metal node to synthesize a series of PCN-224 with different particle sizes based on porphyrin ligands, and investigated the effect of particle size on cellular uptake. Then, Zr6 metal cluster in the PCN-224 molecule was coordinated with the targeting molecule FA, giving it the ability to actively target FA receptors and enhancing its PDT effect [121].

Light, another key factor in PDT, limits the effectiveness of PDT and its ability to treat deep-seated tumors, so conventional PDT is limited to the treatment of skin tumors [122]. The NMOFs offer further possibilities to improve these constraints due to their ease of functionalization. Using the photoconversion capabilities of UCNPs, these nanocomposite systems can be excited by NIR light to produce ROS and thus achieve better PDT results. For example, Li et al. combined PCN-224 and UCNPs to obtain heterostructure and core–shell nanocomposite systems using different preparation methods, namely UCD and UCS (Fig. 14a) [123, 124]. Through conditional surface engineering of UCNPs and subsequent seed-mediated growth strategies, UCSs were synthesized in high yields. The heterogeneous structure of UCS allows for efficient energy transfer from the UCNP core to the MOF shell, which makes it possible to generate cytotoxic reactive oxygen species triggered by NIR light. By encapsulating the hypoxia-activated pro-drug tirapazamine (TPZ) in the nanopore of a heterogeneously structured MOF shell to produce the final construct TPZ/UCS, TPZ/UCSs represent a promising system to achieve improved cancer therapy both in vitro and in vivo. through a combination of NIR light-induced PDT and hypoxia-activated chemotherapy (Fig. 14b). The in vitro cytotoxicity of the system against 4T1 cells was then assessed using CCK-8 assay. Treatment with only NIR irradiation, UCD and UCS did not result in a significant decrease in the cell viability, implying the negligible toxicity of light irradiation and these NPs to 4T1 cells. Furthermore, the integration of the nanoplatform with anti-programmed death ligand 1 (α-PD-L1) therapy promotes a distant compartment effect that completely inhibits the growth of untreated distant tumors by generating specific tumor infiltration of cytotoxic T cells. Qu et al. have improved the tumor hypoxic microenvironment and enhanced the effect of PDT by increasing the oxygen in the tumor [125]. They modified Pt nano enzymes on the surface of PCN-224 to obtain a PCN-224-Pt composite, in which Pt nanoenzyme acts as a peroxidase-like enzyme can catalyze H2O2 to produce O2 with high hydrogen peroxide content, thereby improving the hypoxic environment of tumor tissues and enhancing the effect of PDT.

Fig. 14
figure 14

a Schematic illustration and TEM images of the synthesis of UCD and UCS by the surface engineering of UCNPs; b schematic diagram of the treatment process of TPZ/UCSs. Reproduced with permission [124]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society

In addition to porphyrin-based NMOFs, Xie et al. synthesized BODIPY-immobilized Zr-based MOFs, namely UiO-PDT, by combining BODIPY ligands with UiO-66 via solvent-assisted ligand exchange [126]. Benefiting from the superior photosensitive properties of BODIPY ligand, the UiO-PDT nanocrystals have good biocompatibility and efficient 1O2 production, which can effectively kill cancer cells through PDT process. Zhou et al. used UiO-66 as a nanocarrier to modify PS and photocontrol molecular switches using coordination of Zr6 metal clusters in MOFs to achieve PDT, while controlling 1O2 production by adjusting the ratio of photocontrol molecular switches [127]. This study demonstrates the feasibility of in situ modification of multiple functional units in NMOFs nanoparticles. In addition, the stability of the prepared nano-agents was checked in aqueous media where PXRD and dynamic light scattering (DLS) data showed no significant disruption of the framework over a week. Tang et al. used NMOFs loaded with PSs to enhance the effect of PDT by simultaneously improving both the depth of laser penetration and the tumor hypoxic microenvironment. They used a one-pot method to synthesize ZIF MOFs loaded with both UCNPs and PSs methylene blue and further modified the nanoparticles with hydrogen peroxidase to obtain the core–shell nanocomposite [129]. They loaded both UCNPs and PSs into ZIF-8, and further modified the nanoparticles with peroxidase to obtain the core–shell nanocomposite UCNPs/MB@ZIF-8@catalase by one-pot method. Cell cytotoxicity assays of the nanocomposite and other contrast samples in dark were measured by MTT method against pancreatic cancer cell lines (PL 45 cells). All materials exhibit a relative low toxicity. The UCNPs can be used not only for NIR imaging, but also for ROS production under NIR light irradiation by FRET. Moreover, the modified peroxidase in UCNPs/MB@ZIF-8@catalase can catalyze endogenous H2O2 to produce oxygen in the tumor to overcome the two major obstacles of lack of oxygen in the tumor microenvironment and the limited depth of laser penetration during PDT.

Photo-induced chemodynamic therapy (CDT)

CDT, a new tumor nano-catalytic therapy, not only has the advantage of high selectivity and low toxicity compared to PTT and PDT, but also overcomes the disadvantages of PDT which requires external energy for activation when treating deep-seated tumors [129,130,131]. The basic principle of CDT is to use nanotechnology to deliver Fenton or Fenton-like reaction catalysts into tumor tissues, catalyzing the over-expression of H2O2 in tumor cells to produce ·OH with strong oxidizing power, causing irreversible oxidative damage to molecules such as liposomes, DNA and proteins in tumor cells, thereby inducing apoptosis and killing tumor cells [132]. Therefore, many studies have focused on increasing CDT by improving the ability of tumor tissue to accelerate the Fenton reaction to produce ·OH. Most MOF structures with nodes of Fe and Cu have ligand bonds that are sensitive to pH and are prone to dissociation and release of metal ions in the slightly acidic environment of tumor tissue, while light-induced magnetic and photothermal heating can trigger a temperature rise within the tumor that generates sufficient cytotoxic ROS to amplify the CDT effect [133, 134]. Moreover, MOF materials can deliver large amounts of Fenton or Fenton-like reaction catalysts to tumor tissue, and the reaction rate can be further improved by photothermal effect. This offers the possibility of using MOF as catalysts for Fenton or Fenton-like reactions. So far, there are two ways to enhance CDT, one is raising the temperature at tumor tissue, another is enhancement of optical properties of materials (Fig. 15).

Fig. 15
figure 15

Mechanism of photo-driven Fenton or Fenton like reaction in photo-induced CDT by using MOF-based nanoplatform as therapeutic agent

In 2019, Chen et al. synthesized an activatable nanoenzyme AMP by loading ABTS into the framework of MIL-100 using the Fe-based MOF material MIL-100 as a peroxidase-like enzyme and modifying it with PVP [113]. oxABTS and Fe3+ also depleted intracellular overexpressed GSH and reduced its consumption of MIL-100-catalyzed ·OH, thus enhancing CDT efficiency. In combination with PTT and CDT, AMP showed excellent in vitro and in vivo tumor suppressive effects. Compared to Fe-based catalysts, Cu-based Fenton-like reaction catalysts do not require excessively low pH conditions and have much higher catalytic activity than Fe-based catalysts, such as, Cu+ catalyzed H2O2 decomposition at 160 times the reaction rate of Fe2+ catalysts. Therefore, the use of Cu-based MOF materials to trigger CDT is expected to further improve therapeutic efficiency. Lin groups used Cu2+ and the tetracarboxyphenylporphyrin (H4TBP) to construct the nano-MOF material Cu-TBP for CDT, PDT and immuno-trimodal therapy of tumors [135]. In combination with the immunotherapeutic effect induced by the immune checkpoint inhibitor PDL-1, Cu-TBP not only eliminates tumors in situ but also inhibits the growth of distal tumors. This system provides inspiration for the design of MOF-triggered CDT-based combination therapy strategies.

High levels of glutathione (GSH) in tumor tissue deplete the ROS produced during CDT and PDT, thus reducing the therapeutic effect. Xie et al. constructed a combined ZIF-8-based CDT/PDT system with self-oxygenation, namely O2-Cu/ZIF-8@Ce6/ZIF-8@F127, which can release O2, Cu2+ and Ce6 when decomposed under microacidic tumour conditions (Fig. 16) [136]. The oxidation of Cu2+ consumes GSH in the tumor and is itself reduced to Cu+, which in turn catalyzes the decomposition of H2O2 in the tumour to produce ·OH. Moreover, under 650 nm laser irradiation, the released O2 could be converted to 1O2 by Ce6 to inhibited the growth of 4T1 transplanted tumors.

Fig. 16
figure 16

Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of the TME-responsive OCZCF nanoplatform for enhanced PDT and CDT through GSH depletion and O2 replenishment. Reproduced with permission [136]. Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society

In summary, MOF materials can deliver large amounts of Fenton or Fenton-like reaction catalysts to tumor tissue, which can enhance the CDT effect by selective release of catalysts due to their acid response and other characteristics. However, there are still remains two bottlenecks in CDT: one is the efficiency of catalyzation in the acidic tumor microenvironment and another one is the low optimal reaction pH (2–4) as compared to tumor microenvironment. In addition, the efficiency of CDT is strongly influenced by the intra-tumoral H2O2 concentration, so increasing the concentration of H2O2 in tumor cells will help to improve the efficacy of CDT.

Radiotherapy (RDT)

RDT is a treatment process that uses scintillators and heavy metal materials to absorb X-ray energy and transfer the energy to a photosensitizer to stimulate the production of oxygen radicals by the photosensitizer for cancer treatment [137, 138]. Metal atoms with high atomic number have been shown to possess high X-ray absorption coefficients. Liu et al. prepared polyethylene glycol (PEG) modified MOF-based nanoplatform, namely Hf-TCPP-PEG, composed of Hf4+ and TCPP by a one-pot method, in which Hf4+ with high atomic number served as a radiotherapy sensitizer to improve the efficiency of radiotherapy (Fig. 17a) [139]. In addition, by chelating TCPP with 99mTc4+, a 99mTc4+ labelled RDT agent 99mTc-Hf-TCPP-PEG was obtained, which could generate charged particles for radiosensitisation and kill cancer cells by X-rays emitted by Hf4+ and 99mTc (Fig. 17b and c). Subsequently, Lin et al. found that ROS production was inversely proportional to particle size [140]. They concluded that a larger specific surface area could be an important design and accordingly developed Hf-based NMOFs (Hf6-DBA and Hf12-DBA), both of which have high Z-element and high specific surface area, making them ideal radiation-enhanced materials, while the unique porous structure of the Hf-based NMOFs could facilitate the diffusion of the generated short-lived ROS for better cytotoxic effects. In vitro and in vivo experiments showed that both Hf6-DBA and Hf12-DBA were better than HfO2 NPs in terms of radiation enhancement at the same dose of Hf. Furthermore, the radioluminescence data of the two MOF materials indicate that Hf12-DBA is a better radioactive enhancer than Hf6-DBA, which may be due to the fact that the Hf12 cluster absorbs X-rays more efficiently than the Hf6 cluster.

Fig. 17
figure 17

a Schematic illustration and TEM images of the synthesis of 99mTc-Hf-TCPP-PEG. b in vivo SPECT images of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after intravenous injection with 99mTc-Hf-TCPP-PEG NCPs. c Quantification of SPECT signals in the liver, kidney, tumor, and muscle of 4T1 tumor bearing mice for mice at different time points after intravenous injection with 99mTc-Hf-TCPP-PEG NCPs. Reproduced with permission [139]. Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society

Tumor hypoxia plays a key role in radiation resistance, and one strategy to improve the efficacy of RDT is to modulate the radiosensitivity of the tumor microenvironment [141]. By using ZrCl4 and 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid as precursors, Meng et al. prepared Zr-MOF by a solvothermal method, followed by QU loading and BSA modification to obtain Zr-MOF-QU nanomaterial for RDT (Fig. 18) [142]. Stability experiments showed that Zr-MOF-QU was stable under normal physiological conditions and was dissociated into Zr2+ and 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid in an acid tumor microenvironment, so that when exposed Zr-MOF-QU to the tumor site, 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid is broken down from Zr-MOF and bound to Zn2+ of CAIX to inhibit its catalytic activity. Zr-MOF-QU provides synergistic effects to radiosensitize and modify the radiation resistance of cancer cells, enabling a dual-sensitized tumor radiation therapy. In addition to O2, NO can also help cells cope with hypoxia. Recently, Hu et al. loaded d-arginine (d-Arg) into metal–organic backbone MIL-100 (Fe) nanoparticles, where Fe3+ ions can react with H2O2 through the Fenton reaction, generating free radicals that may act synergistically with d-Arg-derived NO to reduce hypoxia and kill tumors [143]. The results showed that the d-Arg-loaded nanoparticles not only enhanced tumor killing but also effectively avoided tumor metastasis to the lung after radiation treatment.

Fig. 18
figure 18

Schematic illustration of the fabrication process of the Zr-MOF-QU nanoplatform for enhanced RDT and CDT through 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid depletion and relieving hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment. Reproduced with permission [142]. Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society

Brief in all, although NMOFs could act as a promising radiation enhancer due to their superior controllability in terms of metal centers, ligands, size and porous structure. However, the investigation of the relationship between the tumor microenvironment and the efficiency of radiotherapy, and the integration of radiotherapy with other therapeutic approaches are all key to further improving the efficacy of cancer treatment.

Conclusion and outlook

Currently, light-mediated therapy is an emerging method of tumor treatment, which is characterized by non-invasive, highly selective and low toxic side effects by transporting a photosensitizer or photothermal reagent to the tumor site and using an external laser to precisely irradiate the tumor site for tumor suppression. The therapeutic effect of MOFs on cancer cells and tumors is due to its highly porous biocompatible customizable hybrid structure with the ability to load drugs, proteins, genes, etc. Moreover, the easy functionalization of NMOFs to improve the anti-tumor effects of optical therapeutic platforms by improving laser penetration depth, targeting effect, imaging guidance or combination therapy, providing new ideas and strategies for the treatment of tumors. At present, research on NMOFs is focused on the design, development and commercialization of NMOFs rather than the design and synthesis of crystal structures. Fabrication of composites is a good way to explore other ranges of NMOFs, particularly for imaging and drug delivery applications in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Stability, biocompatibility, toxicity and targeted release of drugs are some of the key challenges in developing good MOFs for biological applications.

In terms of diagnosis, despite the fact that some Gd3+, Mn2+, and Fe3+-containing MOFs have shown good efficacy for MRI; the high-Z with strong X-ray attenuation properties (e.g., Hf and Zr) have also act as viable CT contrast agents, but more efforts are required to improve the efficiency of imaging, such as minimizing the signal-to-background ratio, which is a very important medical imaging index. In addition, the complexity of the body or cellular environment brings challenges for the delivery and precise release of drugs at the desired site of action. The transport of drug system across biological membranes, including blood brain barrier, is also a major challenge, and much effort is needed in this area to improve the prospects of NMOFs and MOFs in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

In terms of therapy, research on light-mediated therapeutic research based on NMOFs up a new avenue to address current technical barriers, but enables safer treatment for patients, and further exploration is needed to rationalize the clinical application of these therapeutic nano-agents in the tumor microenvironment. The toxicological behavior of MOF-based agents in the human vascular system in terms of potential immune response, biodistribution and toxicity in organs, and excretion in the liver, bile and kidneys need to be further explored. Furthermore, a systematic understanding of the human body’s response to different external stimuli (e.g., light, ultrasound, etc.) is essential, which could provide important insights for the fabrication of appropriate photoactivation platforms for therapeutic use in living systems.

Overall, despite many efforts to improve the performance of current MOF-based nano-therapeutic agents, it is still not ready to enter a new phase of clinical trials. The development of new MOF-based nano-agents requires full consideration of specificity, selectivity, efficiency, degradability, responsiveness, delivery, targeting and biosafety. Meeting all these requirements regarding the development of the next generation of MOF-based nano-therapeutic agents will certainly accelerate the pace of clinical translation significantly.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

NMOFs:

Nanoscale metal–organic frameworks

EPR:

Enhanced permeability and retention

PS:

Photosensitizer

S 0 :

PS ground state

S 1 :

PS excited singlet state

T 1 :

PS-excited triplet state

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

CT:

X-ray computed tomography

PET:

Positron emission tomography

PAI:

Photoacoustic imaging

T 1 :

Longitudinal relaxation rates

T 2 :

Transverse relaxation rates

FL:

Fluorescence

PAT:

Photothermal ablation therapy

LD50:

Lethal dose 50

SPIOs:

Superparamagnetic iron oxides

DTPA:

Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid

TCPP:

Tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin

PB:

Prussian blue

BODIPY:

Iodine-boron-dipyrromethene dye

SBUs:

Secondary building units

NIR:

Near infrared

RhB:

Rhodamine B

MGC-803:

Mouse gastric cancer 803

HASMC:

Human airway smooth muscle cells

PersL:

Persistent luminescence

MTT:

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

TCH:

Tetracycline hydrochloride

5-FU:

5-Fluorouracil

PDT:

Photodynamic therapy

DCA:

Dichloroacetate

TPP:

Triphenylphosphonium

PEG:

Polyethylene glycol

FA:

Folic acid

PDA:

Polydopamine

THQ:

Tetrahydroxyanthraquinone

PVP:

Polyvinylpyrrolidone

UCL:

Upconversion luminescence

ICG:

Indocyanine green

UCNPs:

Upconversion nanoparticles

PTT:

Photothermal therapy

CDT:

Chemodynamic therapy

PDIs:

Perylenediimide

PTAs:

Photothermal agents

HA:

Hyaluronic acid

ABTS:

2,2′-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid

LSPR:

Localized surface plasmon resonance

H2DBP:

5,15-Di(p-benzoato)porphyrin

H2DBC:

5,15-Di(p-benzoato)-chlorin

TPZ:

Tirapazamine

α-PD-L1:

Anti-programmed death ligand 1

H4TBP:

Tetracarboxyphenylporphyrin

GSH:

Glutathione

References

  1. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, Bonaventure A, Valkov M, Johnson CJ, Estève J, Ogunbiyi OJ, Silva JAE, Chen WQ, Eser S, Engholm G, Stiller AG, Monnereau A, Woods RR, Visser O, Lim GH, Aitken J, Weir HK, Coleman MP. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37513025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391:1023–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thirajan M, Chen YH, Joshi P, Pandey RK. The role of porphyrin chemistry in tumor imaging and photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:340–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu H, Guo T, Nan J, Yang L, Liao G, Park HJ, Li J. Hyaluronic-acid-coated chitosan nanoparticles for insulin oral delivery: fabrication, characterization, and hypoglycemic ability. Macromol Biosci. 2022;22:2100493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ai XZ, Mu J, Xing BG. Recent advances of light-mediated. Theranostics. 2016;6:2439–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen JM, Fan TJ, Xie ZJ, Zeng QQ, Xue P, Zheng TT, Chen Y, Luo XL, Zhang H. Advances in nanomaterials for photodynamic therapy applications: status and challenges. Biomaterials. 2020;237: 119827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen TL, Choi Y, Kim J. Mesoporous silica as a versatile platform for cancer immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1803953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Liang D, Qu ZH, Kislyakov IM, Kiselev VM, Liu J. PEGylated-folic acid-modified black phosphorus quantum dots as near-infrared agents for dual-modality imaging-guided selective cancer cell destruction. Nanophotonics. 2020;9:2425–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu HF, Sun YQ, Li ZH, Yang J, Aryee AA, Qu LB, Du D, Lin YH. Lysosome-targeted carbon dots for ratiometric imaging of formaldehyde in living cells. Nanoscale. 2019;11:8458–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X, Xi ZQ, Machuki JO, Luo JJ, Yang DZ, Li JJ, Cai WB, Yang Y, Zhang LJ, Tian JW, Guo KJ, Yu YY, Gao FL. Gold cube-in-cube based oxygen nanogenerator: a theranostic nanoplatform for modulating tumor microenvironment for precise chemo-phototherapy and multimodal imaging. ACS Nano. 2019;13:5306–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yan ZL, Wang MY, Shi MK, He Y, Zhang Y, Qiu SH, Yang H, Chen HB, He H, Guo ZQ. Amphiphilic BODIPY dye aggregates in polymeric micelles for wavelength-dependent photo-induced cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:6886–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li YJ, Hu J, Liu X, Liu Y, Lv SX, Dang JJ, Ji Y, He YL, Yin LC. Photodynamic therapy-triggered on-demand drug release from ROS-responsive core-cross-linked micelles toward synergistic anti-cancer treatment. Nano Res. 2019;12:999–1008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:20–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liao G, He F, Li Q, Zhong L, Zhao R, Chee H, Gao H, Fang B. Emerging graphitic carbon nitride-based materials for biomedical applications. Prog Mater Sci. 2020;112: 100666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang M, Zou Y, Zhong Y, Liao G, Yu C, Xu Z. Polydopamine-based tumor-targeted multifunctional reagents for computer tomography/fluorescence dual-mode bioimaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2:630–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Belfiore L, Saunders DN, Ranson M, Thurecht KJ, Storm G, Vine KL. Towards clinical translation of ligand-functionalized liposomes in targeted cancer therapy: challenges and opportunities. J Control Release. 2018;277:1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’keeffe M, Yaghi OM. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science. 2013;341:1230444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meek ST, Greathouse JA, Allendorf MD. Metal-organic frameworks: a rapidly growing class of versatile nanoporous materials. Adv Mater. 2011;23:249–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuppler RJ, Timmons DJ, Fang QR, Li JR, Makal TA, Young MD, Yuan DQ, Zhao D, Zhuang WJ, Zhou HC. Potential applications of metal-organic frameworks. Coord Chem Rev. 2009;253:3042–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen GS, Kou XX, Huang SM, Tong LJ, Shen YJ, Zhu WS, Zhu F, Ouyang GF. Modulating the biofunctionality of metal-organic framework-encapsulated enzymes through controllable embedding patterns. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59:2867–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang SM, Kou XX, Shen J, Chen GS, Ouyang GF. “Armor-plating” enzymes with metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59:8786–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohammad RS, Navid R, Masoud M, Francis V, Leonid GV, Rafael L. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for cancer therapy. Materials. 2021;14:7277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lai XD, Jiang H, Wang XM. Biodegradable metal organic frameworks for multimodal imaging and targeting theranostics. Biosensors. 2021;11:299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Celli JP, Spring BQ, Rizvi I, Evans CL, Samkoe KS, Verma S, Pogue BW, Hasan T. Imaging and photodynamic therapy: mechanisms, monitoring, and optimization. Chem Rev. 2010;110:2795–838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dolmans DE, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:380–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang G, Sun X, Liu J. Light-responsive, singlet-oxygen-triggered on-demand drug release from photosensitizer-doped mesoporous silica nanorods for cancer combination therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:4722–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen XF, Song JB, Chen XY, Yang HH. X-ray-activated nanosystems for theranostic applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48:3073–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duan W, Qiao S, Zhuo M, Sun J, Guo M, Xu F, Liu J, Wang T, Guo X, Zhang Y, Gao J, Huang Y, Zhang Z, Cheng P, Ma S, Chen Y. Multifunctional platforms: metal-organic frameworks for cutaneous and cosmetic treatment. Inside Chem. 2021;7:450–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ng KK, Zheng G. Molecular interactions in organic nanoparticles for phototheranostic applications. Chem Rev. 2015;115:11012–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Plaetzer K, Krammer B, Berlanda J, Berr F, Kiesslich T. Photophysics and photochemistry of photodynamic therapy: fundamental aspects. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:259–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2004;1:279–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ochsner M. Photophysical and photobiological processes in the photodynamic therapy of tumours. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 1997;39:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Juarranz Á, Jaén P, Sanz-Rodríguez F, Cuevas J, González S. Photodynamic therapy of cancer. Basic principles and applications. Clin Transl Oncol. 2008;10:148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Henderson BW, Dougherty TJ. How does photodynamic therapy work? Photochem Photobiol. 1992;55:145–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao D, Zhang W, Wu ZH, Xu H. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks and their nanomedicine applications. Front Chem. 2022;9: 834171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao D, Yu S, Jiang WJ, Cai ZH, Li DL, Liu YL, Chen ZZ. Recent progress in metal-organic framework based fluorescent sensors for hazardous materials detection. Molecules. 2022;27:2226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dong D, Zhao D, Lu Y, Sun WY. Photoluminescent metal-organic frameworks and their application for sensing biomolecules. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7:22744–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu JT, Huang J, Zhang L, Lei JP. Multifunctional metal-organic framework heterostructures for enhanced cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:1188–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Khoo VS, Dearnaley DP, Finnigan DJ, Padhani A, Tanner SF, Leach MO. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiother Oncol. 1997;42:1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Salvio SG, Rubén S, Fernando N, Ramon A, Félix B, Daniel RM. Coordination polymers nanoparticles for bioimaging. Coordin Chem Rev. 2021;432: 213716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hessamaddin S, Siamak J, Fatemeh O, Farzaneh R, Ahmad S, Mir RM, Mahmoud H, Younes H, Ahad M, Ali M. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks: recent developments in synthesis, modifications and bioimaging applications. Chemosphere. 2021;281:30717.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lei PP, Feng J, Zhang HJ. Emerging biomaterials: taking full advantage of the intrinsic properties of rare earth elements. Nano Today. 2020;35: 100952.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rieter WJ, Taylor KML, An HY, Lin WL, Lin WB. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks as potential multimodal contrast enhancing agents. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:9024–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Y-M, Liu W, Yin X-B. Self-limiting growth nanoscale coordination polymers for fluorescence and magnetic resonance dual-modality imaging. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:8463–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Taylor KM, Rieter WJ, Lin W. Manganese-based nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:14358–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang Y, Liu JJ, Liang C, Feng LZ, Fu TT, Dong ZL, Chao Y, Li YG, Lu G, Chen MW, Liu Z. Nanoscale metal-organic particles with rapid clearance for magnetic resonance imaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2016;10:2774–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wan SS, Cheng Q, Zeng X, Zhang XZ. A Mn(III)-sealed metal-organic framework nanosystem for redox-unlocked tumor theranostics. ACS Nano. 2019;13:6561–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kemp JA, Kwon YJ. Cancer nanotechnology: current status and perspectives. Nano Convergence. 2021;8:34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Horcajada P, Chalati T, Serre C, Gillet B, Sebrie C, Baati T, Eubank JF, Heurtaux D, Clayette P, Kreuz C, Chang JS, Hwang YK, Marsaud V, Bories PN, Cynober L, Gil S, Férey G, Couvreur P, Gref R. Porous metal-organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat Mater. 2010;9:172–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang DD, Zhou JJ, Chen RH, Shi RH, Zhao GZ, Xia GL, Li R, Liu ZB, Tian J, Wang HJ, Guo Z, Wang HB, Chen QW. Controllable synthesis of dual-MOFs nanostructures for pH-responsive artemisinin delivery, magnetic resonance and optical dual-model imaging-guided chemo/photothermal combinational cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2016;100:27–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang LY, Liu C, Gao Y, Li ZH, Xing J, Ren WZ, Zhang LL, Li AG, Lu GM, Wu AG, Zeng LY. ZD2-engineered gold nanostar@metal-organic framework nanoprobes for T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal therapy specifically toward triple-negative breast cancer. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7:1801144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Meng Y, Zhang D, Sun Y, Dai Z, Zhang T, Yu D, Zhang G, Zheng X. Core–shell FePt-cube@covalent organic polymer nanocomposites: a multifunctional nanocatalytic agent for primary and metastatic tumor treatment. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:11021–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Meng Y, Zhang D, Chen X, Dai Z, Yao X, Cui P, Yu D, Zhang G, Zheng X. FePt nanoparticles embedded in metal-organic framework nanoparticles for tumor imaging and eradication. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020;3:4494–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gao X, Zhai M, Guan W, Liu J, Liu Z, Damirin A. Controllable synthesis of a smart multifunctional nanoscale metal-organic framework for magnetic resonance/optical imaging and targeted drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:3455–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wu M, Gao J, Wang F, Yang J, Song N, Jin X, Mi P, Tian J, Luo J, Liang F, Yang Y. Multistimuli responsive core-shell nanoplatform constructed from Fe3O4@MOF equipped with pillar[6]arene nanovalves. Small. 2018;14:1704440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chowdhuri AR, Bhattacharya D, Sahu SK. Magnetic nanoscale metal organic frameworks for potential targeted anticancer drug delivery, imaging and as an MRI contrast agent. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:2963–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Schmidt B, Westerman BL, Morgan HT, Saini S. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004;233:649–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yang X, Gao L, Guo Q, Li Y, Ma Y, Yang J, Gong C, Yi C. Nanomaterials for radiotherapeutics-based multimodal synergistic cancer therapy. Nano Res. 2020;13:2579–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dekrafft KE, Boyle WS, Burk LM, Zhou O, Lin W. Zr-and Hf-based nanoscale metal-organic frameworks as contrast agents for computed tomography. J Mater Chem. 2012;22:18139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang T, Wang L, Ma C, Wang WQ, Ding J, Liu S, Zhang XW, Xie ZG. BODIPY-containing nanoscale metal-organic frameworks as contrast agents for computed tomography. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:2330–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang Y, Chao Y, Liu J, Dong Z, He W, Zhang R, Yang K, Chen M, Liu Z. Core-shell and Co-doped nanoscale metal-organic particles (NMOPs) obtained via postsynthesis cation exchange for multimodal imaging and synergistic thermo-radiotherapy. NPG Asia Mater. 2017;9: e344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Li X, Cai Z, Jiang L, He Z, Zhu J. Metal-ligand coordination nanomaterials for biomedical imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2020;31:332–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Shang W, Zeng C, Du Y, Hui H, Liang X, Chi C, Wang K, Wang Z, Tian J. Core-shell gold nanood@metal-organic framework nanoprobes for multimodality diagnosis of glioma. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1604381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Basu S, Alavi A. PET-based personalized management in clinical oncology. PET Clinics. 2016;11:203–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Jacobson O, Chen X. Interrogating tumor metabolism and tumor microenvironments using molecular positron emission tomography imaging theranostic approaches to improve therapeutics. Pharmacol Rev. 2013;65:1214–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Hamoudeh M, Kamleh MA, Diab R, Fessi H. Radionuclides delivery systems for nuclear imaging and radiotherapy of cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1329–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Duman FD, Forgan RS. Applications of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks as imaging agents in biology and medicine. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9:3423–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen D, Yang D, Dougherty CA, Lu W, Wu H, He X, Cai T, Van Dort ME, Ross BD, Hong H. In vivo targeting and positron emission tomography imaging of tumor with intrinsically radioactive metal-organic frameworks nanomaterials. ACS Nano. 2017;11:4315–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Duan DB, Liu H, Xu MX, Chen MQ, Han YX, Shi YX, Liu ZB. Size-controlled synthesis of drug-loaded zeolitic imidazolate framework in aqueous solution and size effect on their cancer theranostics in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:42165–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Erturk, S.M., Johnston, C., Tempany-Afdhal, C., Van den Abbeele, A.D.: Imaging tools in human research-chapter 6. CTS., 87–104 (2009)

  71. Liu D, Huxford RC, Lin W. Phosphorescent nanoscale coordination polymers as contrast agents for optical imaging. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:3696–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Padmanabhan P, Kumar A, Kumar S, Chaudhary RK, Gulya’s B. Nanoparticles in practice for molecular-imaging applications: an overview. Acta Biomater. 2016;41:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Liu W, Wang YM, Li YH, Cai SJ, Yin XB, He XW, Zhang YK. Fluorescent imaging-guided chemotherapy-and-photodynamic dual therapy with nanoscale porphyrin metal-organic framework. Small. 2017;13:1603459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Qian J, Feng Z, Fan X, Kuzmin A, Gomes ASL, Prasad PN. High contrast 3-D optical bioimaging using molecular and nanoprobes optically responsive to IR light. Phys Rep. 2022;5:1–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhao H, Shu G, Zhu J, Fu Y, Gu Z, Yang D. Persistent luminescent metal-organic frameworks with long-lasting near infrared emission for tumor site activated imaging and drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2019;217: 119332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Ge X, Wong R, Anisa A, Ma S. Recent development of metal-organic framework nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2022;281: 121322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Foucault-Collet A, Gogick KA, White KA, Villette S, Pallier A, Collet G, Kieda C, Li T, Geib SJ, Rosi NL, Petoud S. Lanthanide near infrared imaging in living cells with Yb3+ nano metal organic frameworks. PNAS. 2013;110:17199–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Chen H, Wang J, Shan D, Chen J, Zhang S, Lu X. Dual-emitting fluorescent metal-organic framework nanocomposites as a broad-range pH sensor for fluorescence imaging. Anal Chem. 2018;90:7056–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wang YM, Xu Y, Zhang X, Cui Y, Liang Q, Liu C, Wang X, Wu S, Yang R. Single nano-sized metal-organic framework for bio-banoarchitectonics with In vivo fluorescence imaging and chemo-photodynamic therapy. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Gao X, Wang Y, Ji G, Cui R, Liu Z. One-pot synthesis of hierarchical-pore metal–organic frameworks for drug delivery and fluorescent imaging. CrystEngComm. 2018;20:1087–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Wang Y, Wu W, Liu J, Manghnani PN, Hu F, Ma D, The C, Wang B, Liu B. Cancer-cell-activated photodynamic therapy assisted by Cu(II)-based metal-organic framework. ACS Nano. 2019;13:6879–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Haddad S, Abánades Lázaro I, Fantham M, Mishra A, Silvestre-Albero J, Osterrieth JW, Kaminski Schierle GS, Kaminski CF, Forgan RS, Fairen-Jimenez D. Design of a functionalized metal-organic framework system for enhanced targeted delivery to mitochondria. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:6661–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Deng K, Hou Z, Li X, Li C, Zhang Y, Deng X, Cheng Z, Liu J. Aptamer-mediated up-conversion core/MOF shell nanocomposites for targeted drug delivery and cell imaging. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Chowdhuri AR, Laha D, Pal S, Karmakar P, Sahu SK. One-pot synthesis of folic acid encapsulated upconversion nanoscale metal organic frameworks for targeting, imaging and pH responsive drug release. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:18120–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Li Y, Gecevicius M, Yan XP. Long persistent phosphors—from fundamentals to applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:2090–136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sun SK, Wang HF, Yan XP. Engineering persistent luminescence nanoparticles for biological applications: from biosensing/bioimaging to theranostics. Accounts Chem Res. 2018;51:1131–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Lv Y, Ding D, Zhuang Y, Feng Y, Shi J, Zhang J, Zhou T-T, Chen H, Xie R-J. Chromium-doped zinc gallogermanate@zeolitic imidazolate framework-8: a multifunctional nanoplatform for rechargeable in vivo persistent luminescence imaging and pH-responsive drug release. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:1907–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Liu J, Liu T, Du P, Zhang L, Lei J. Metal-organic framework (MOF) hybrid as a tandem catalyst for enhanced therapy against hypoxic tumor cells. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2019;58:7808–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Zackrisson S, Van De Ven SMWY, Gambhir SS. Light in and sound out: emerging translational strategies for photoacoustic imaging. Cancer Res. 2014;74:979–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhang HF, Maslov K, Stoica G, Wang LV. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:848–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kolkman RG, Brands PJ, Steenbergen W, Van Leeuwen TG. Real-time in vivo photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2008;13: 050510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Zhang J, Chen H, Zhou T, Wang L, Gao D, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wu C, Yuan Z. A PIID-DTBT based semi-conducting polymer dots with broad and strong optical absorption in the visible-light region: highly effective contrast agents for multiscale and multi-spectral photoacoustic imaging. Nano Res. 2017;10:64–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Zhu Y, Xin N, Qiao Z, Chen S, Zeng L, Zhang Y, Wei D, Sun J, Fan H. Bioactive MOFs based theranostic agent for highly effective combination of multimodal imaging and chemo-phototherapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;9:2000205.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang Y, Wang L, Liu L, Lin L, Liu F, Xie Z, Tian H, Chen X. Engineering metal-organic frameworks for photoacoustic imaging-guided chemo-/photothermal combinational tumor therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:41035–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Yang P, Tian Y, Men Y, Guo R, Peng H, Jiang Q, Yang W. Metal-organic frameworks-derived carbon nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal/photodynamic combined therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:42039–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Zhang D, Xu H, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wu M, Li J, Yang H, Liu G, Liu X, Liu J, Yuan Z. Self-quenched metal-organic particles as dual-mode therapeutic agents for photoacoustic imaging-guided second near-infrared window photochemotherapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:25203–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Cai W, Wang J, Liu H, Chen W, Wang J, Du L, Hu J, Wu CS. Gold nanorods@metal-organic framework core-shell nanostructure as contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging and its biocompatibility. Compd. 2018;748:193–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Yang J, Yang YW. Metal-organic framework-based cancer theranostic nanoplatforms. View. 2020;1:20.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Zou Y, Sun F, Liu C, Yu C, Zhang M, He Q, Xiong Y, Xu Z, Yang S, Liao G. A novel nanotheranostic agent for dual-mode imaging-guided cancer therapy based on europium complexes-grafted-oxidative dopamine. Chem Eng J. 2019;357:237–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Li Y, Tang JL, He LC, Liu Y, Liu YL, Chen CY, Tang ZY. Core-shell upconversion nanoparticle@metal-organic framework nanoprobes for luminescent/magnetic dual-mode targeted imaging. Adv Mater. 2015;27:4075–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Cai W, Gao HY, Chu CC, Wang XY, Wang JQ, Zhang PF, Lin G, Li WG, Liu G, Chen XY. Engineering phototheranostic nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for multimodal imaging-guided cancer therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:2040–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang HY, Hao CL, Qu AH, Sun MZ, Xu LG, Xu CL, Kuang H. Heterostructures of MOFs and nanorods for multimodal imaging. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1805320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Xiong YX, Sun F, Liu P, Yang Z, Cao JG, Liu HJ, Liu P, Hu JL, Xu ZS, Yang SL. A biomimetic one-pot synthesis of versatile Bi2S3/FeS2 theranostic nanohybrids for tumor-targeted photothermal therapy guided by CT/MR dual-modal imaging. Chem Eng J. 2019;378: 122172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Liu YH, Lv SB, Liu DP, Song FL. Recent development of amorphous metal coordination polymers for cancer therapy. Acta Bio. 2020;116:16–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Tian Q, Xue FF, Wang YR, Cheng YY, An L, Yang SP, Chen XY, Huang G. Recent advances in enhanced chemodynamic therapy strategies. Nano Today. 2021;39: 101162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Doughty ACV, Hoover AR, Layton E, Murray CK, Howard EW, Chen WR. Nanomaterial applications in photothermal therapy for cancer. Materials. 2019;12:779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Hu JJ, Cheng YJ, Zhang XZ. Recent advances in nanomaterials for enhanced photothermal therapy of tumors. Nanoscale. 2018;10:22657–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Jung HS, Verwilst P, Sharma A, Shin J, Sessler JL, Kim JS. Organic molecule-based photothermal agents: an expanding photothermal therapy universe. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:2280–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Zou Y, Jin H, Sun F, Dai X, Xu Z, Yang S, Liao G. Design and synthesis of a Lead sulfide based nanotheranostic agent for computer tomography/magnetic resonance dual-mode-bioimaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2018;1:2294–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Mo Z, Qiu M, Zhao K, Hua H, Xua Q, Cao J, Luo Y, Liu L, Xu Z, Yi C, Xiong Z, Liao G, Yang S. Multifunctional phototheranostic nanoplatform based on polydopamine-manganese dioxide-IR780 iodide for effective magnetic resonance imaging-guided synergistic photodynamic/photothermal therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;611:193–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Lü BZ, Chen YF, Li PY, Wang B, Müllen K, Yin MY. Stable radical anions generated from a porous perylenediimide metal-organic framework for boosting near-infrared photothermal conversion. Nat Commun. 2019;10:767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Yang Y, Deng YY, Huang JB, Fan X, Cheng C, Nie CX, Ma L, Zhao WF, Zhao CS. Size-transformable metal-organic framework-derived nanocarbons for localized chemo-photothermal bacterial ablation and wound disinfection. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1900143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Liu F, Lin L, Zhang Y, Wang YB, Sheng S, Xu CN, Tian HY, Chen XS. A tumor-microenvironment-activated nanozyme-mediated theranostic nanoreactor for imaging-guided combined tumor therapy. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1902885.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Deng XR, Liang S, Cai XC, Huang SS, Cheng ZY, Shi YS, Pang ML, Ma PA, Lin J. Yolk–shell structured Au nanostar@Metal-organic framework for synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy in the second near-infrared window. Nano Lett. 2019;19:6772–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Wang ZJ, Yu WJ, Yu N, Li X, Feng YR, Geng P, Wen M, Li M, Zhang H, Chen ZG. Construction of CuS@Fe-MOF nanoplatforms for MRI-guided synergistic photothermal-chemo therapy of tumors. Chem Eng J. 2020;400: 125877.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhang C, Zhao KL, Bu WB, Ni DL, Liu YY, Feng JW, Shi JL. Marriage of scintillator and semiconductor for synchronous radiotherapy and deep photodynamic therapy with diminished oxygen dependence. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54:1790–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Hudson AB, Quezada-Novoa V, Ashlee JH. Metal-organic frameworks for the generation of reactive oxygen species. Chem Phys Rev. 2021;2:041301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Chen JJ, Zhu YF, Kaskel S. Porphyrin-based metal-organic frameworks for biomedical applications. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59:2–28.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Lu KD, He CB, Lin WB. Nanoscale metal-organic framework for highly effective photodynamic therapy of resistant head and neck cancer. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:16712–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Lu KD, He CB, Lin WB. A Chlorin-based nanoscale metal-organic framework for photodynamic therapy of colon cancers. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:7600–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Park J, Jiang Q, Feng DW, Mao LQ, Zhou HC. Size-controlled synthesis of porphyrinic metal-organic framework and functionalization for targeted photodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:3518–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Liu C, Liu B, Zhao J, Di ZH, Chen DQ, Gu ZJ, Li LL, Zhao YL. Nd3+-sensitized upconversion metal-organic frameworks for mitochondria-targeted amplified photodynamic therapy. Angew Chem Inter Ed. 2020;59:2634–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Li Y, Di Z, Gao J, Cheng P, Di C, Zhang F, Liu B, Shi X, Sun L, Li L, Yan C. Heterodimers made of upconversion nanoparticles and metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:13804–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Shao Y, Liu B, Di Z, Zhang G, Sun L, Li L, Yan C. Engineering of upconverted metal-organic frameworks for near-infrared light-triggered combinational photodynamic/chemo-/immunotherapy against hypoxic tumors. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:3939–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Zhang Y, Wang FM, Liu CQ, Wang ZZ, Kang LH, Huang YY, Dong K, Ren JS, Qu XG. Nanozyme decorated metal-organic frameworks for enhanced photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12:651–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Wang WQ, Wang L, Li ZS, Xie ZG. BODIPY-containing nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for photodynamic therapy. Chem Comm. 2016;52:5402–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Park J, Jiang Q, Feng DW, Zhou HC. Controlled generation of singlet oxygen in living cells with tunable ratios of the photochromic switch in metal-organic frameworks. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:7188–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Cai HJ, Shen TT, Zhang J, Shan CF, Jia JG, Li X, Liu WS, Tang Y. A core-shell metal-organic-framework (MOF)-based smart nanocomposite for efficient NIR/H2O2-responsive photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor cells. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:2390–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Kumar B, Koul S, Khandrika L, Meacham RB, Koul HK. Oxidative stress is inherent in prostate cancer cells and is required for aggressive phenotype. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1777–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Murphy MP. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J. 2009;417:1–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Mo Z, Li Q, Zhao K, Xu Q, Hu H, Chen X, Luo Y, Chi B, Liu L, Fang X, Liao G, Xu Z, Wang J, Yang S. A nanoarchitectonic approach enables triple modal synergistic therapies to enhance antitumor effects. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14:10001–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Guan Q, Zhou LL, Dong B. Ferroptosis in cancer therapeutics: a materials chemistry perspective. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9:8906–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Zhong YY, Li XS, Chen JH, Wang XX, Wei LT, Fang LQ, Kumar A, Zhuang SZ, Liu JQ. Recent advances in MOF-based nanoplatforms generating reactive species for chemodynamic therapy. Dalton Trans. 2020;49:11045–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Liu X, Jin YL, Liu TT, Yang SJ, Zhou MX, Wang WQ, Yu HJ. Iron-based theranostic nanoplatform for improving chemodynamic therapy of cancer. ACS Biomaterials Sci Eng. 2020;6:4834–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Ni K, Aung T, Li S, Fatuzzo N, Liang X, Lin W. Nanoscale metal-organic framework mediates radical therapy to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Chem. 2019;5:1892–913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Xie ZX, Liang S, Cai XC, Ding BB, Huang SS, Hou ZY, Ma PA, Cheng ZY, Lin J. O2-Cu/ZIF-8@Ce6/ZIF-8@F127 Composite as a tumor microenvironment-responsive nanoplatform with enhanced photo-/chemodynamic antitumor efficacy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:31671–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Li S, Tan L. Meng, X: Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks: synthesis, biocompatibility, imaging applications, and thermal and dynamic therapy of tumors. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1908924.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Ni K, Lan G, Lin W. Nanoscale Metal−organic frameworks generate reactive oxygen species for cancer therapy. ACS Cent Sci. 2020;6:861–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Chao Y, Liang C, Yang Y, Wang G, Maiti D, Tian LF, Pan W, Wu S, Yang K, Liu Z. Highly effective radioisotope cancer therapy with a non-therapeutic isotope delivered and sensitized by nanoscale coordination polymers. ACS Nano. 2018;12:7519–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Ni K, Lan G, Chan C, Quigley B, Lu K, Aung T, Guo N, La Riviere P, Weichselbaum RR, Lin W. Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks enhance radiotherapy to potentiate checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2351.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Chen Y, Zhong H, Wang J, Wan X, Li Y, Pan W, Li N, Tang B. Catalase-like metal–organic framework nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in hypoxic cancer and prevent cancer recurrence. Chem Sci. 2019;10:5773–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Ma T, Liu Y, Wu Q, Luo L, Cui Y, Wang X, Chen X, Tan L, Meng X. Quercetin-modified metal–organic frameworks for dual sensitization of radiotherapy in tumor tissues by inhibiting the carbonic anhydrase IX. ACS Nano. 2019;13:4209–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Du C, Zhou M, Jia F, Ruan L, Lu H, Zhang J, Zhu B, Liu X, Chen J, Chai Z, Hu Y. D-arginine-loaded metal-organic frameworks nanoparticles sensitize osteosarcoma to radiotherapy. Biomaterials. 2021;269: 120642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was also supported by the Scientific Research Foundation of Ningbo University (No. 421911882) and the State Key Laboratory of coordination chemistry of Nanjing University (No. SKLCC2112) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DZ conceived and wrote the paper; WZ and SY provide partial figures; SLX made suggestions to improve the paper; YNL and GJY polished the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dan Zhao, Ya-Nan Liu or Guan-Jun Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, D., Zhang, W., Yu, S. et al. Application of MOF-based nanotherapeutics in light-mediated cancer diagnosis and therapy. J Nanobiotechnol 20, 421 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01631-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01631-2

Keywords

  • Light-mediated
  • Metal–organic frameworks
  • Nanotherapeutics
  • Cancer diagnosis
  • Therapy