Skip to main content

Advancement in nanomaterials for environmental pollutants remediation: a systematic review on bibliometrics analysis, material types, synthesis pathways, and related mechanisms

Abstract

Environmental pollution is a major issue that requires effective solutions. Nanomaterials (NMs) have emerged as promising candidates for pollution remediation due to their unique properties. This review paper provides a systematic analysis of the potential of NMs for environmental pollution remediation compared to conventional techniques. It elaborates on several aspects, including conventional and advanced techniques for removing pollutants, classification of NMs (organic, inorganic, and composite base). The efficiency of NMs in remediation of pollutants depends on their dispersion and retention, with each type of NM having different advantages and disadvantages. Various synthesis pathways for NMs, including traditional synthesis (chemical and physical) and biological synthesis pathways, mechanisms of reaction for pollutants removal using NMs, such as adsorption, filtration, disinfection, photocatalysis, and oxidation, also are evaluated. Additionally, this review presents suggestions for future investigation strategies to improve the efficacy of NMs in environmental remediation. The research so far provides strong evidence that NMs could effectively remove contaminants and may be valuable assets for various industrial purposes. However, further research and development are necessary to fully realize this potential, such as exploring new synthesis pathways and improving the dispersion and retention of NMs in the environment. Furthermore, there is a need to compare the efficacy of different types of NMs for remediating specific pollutants. Overall, this review highlights the immense potential of NMs for mitigating environmental pollutants and calls for more research in this direction.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Exponential population growth and rapid global industrialization result in a significant discharge of pollutants into the environment. Environmental contamination has become a major issue worldwide because even a small concentration of toxic pollutants can lead to serious health issues for human and animals [1, 2]. Undesirable gases, bioaerosols, oxides, microbes, sooth, heavy metals, and other toxic materials in outdoor and indoor air cause severe effects on human health and environment [3]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 91% of the world's population resides in places where pollutant levels exceed thresholds of WHO air quality guidelines. Ambient air pollution is estimated to cause 4.2 million premature deaths globally [4]. Additionally, millions of harmful effluents in water from industrialization and urbanization effect the water quality [1, 5] Those pollutants mainly include pharmaceuticals, metals, dyes, pesticides, fertilizers, microorganisms (MOs), personal care products and radionuclides, etc., are significant threats towards global water security [6,7,8]. Those pollutants enter the food chain and cause detrimental effects on human health and negatively affect socio-economic development [9]. Thus, it is crucial to determine and eliminate primary sources and concentrations of all contaminants using cutting-edge technologies that could deliver reliability and high quality cost-effectively and comply with environmental standards and regulations [8, 10]. Numerous remediation techniques have been developed during the last few decades to address air and water contaminants, including physical, chemical, and biological methods; however, most of those treatment techniques have significant limitations, such as high costs, the complexity of the operation, and secondary contamination [11].

Nanomaterials (NMs) are ultrafine particles ranging from 1 to 100 nm though size does not give a satisfactory definition of NMs classification as shown in Fig. 1A. They can be natural, manmade, or incidental materials [12]. NMs exhibit diverse structural dimensions, including zero-dimensional (0D), one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and three-dimensional (3D) arrangements. In the 0D configuration, nanometer-scale dimensions are observed along all three axes (x, y, z). In the case of 1D materials, nanometer-scale features are limited to two dimensions. Similarly, 2D structures possess nanometer-scale attributes in just one direction. Notably, the classification extends to encompass three-dimensional (3D) nanostructures, despite their dimensions exceeding 100 nm as shown in Fig. 1B. NMs can be synthesized through chemical, biological, and green-based routes [3]. During the past few years NMs are gaining much interest in environmental applications as promising adsorbents and catalysts for the application of environmental remediation [13]. Through their unique redox properties and significant features such as size, dissolution/solubility, surface area, surface charge, and surface chemical composition beneficial for the removal of redox-sensitive pollutants via degradation [14, 15]. Many types of NMs have been developed to treat water contaminations and air cleaning as a cost-effective and reliable technique because they provide high adsorption capacities and increased surface area compared to micro and macrostructures [16, 17]. Additionally, careful tunning and surface modification of NMs provides additional characteristics and substantial benefits for tackling environmental contamination. Some NMs eliminate, while others sequester pollutants [18]. However, NMs have some drawbacks, such as high costs, potential toxicity, challenges with recycling, and interactions with other media. Moreover, exposure and unintentional release of NMs pose substantial risks and health concerns [19]. Several dependable, low-cost, and environmentally friendly NMs with various functions have been described for detoxifying pollutants from air and water [5, 20, 21]. However, it should be safe and demonstrate strong sorption capacity and selectivity, particularly because pollutants found in low concentrations should easily be removed and recycled. Much research in recent years has proven that NMs can meet most of those requirements.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Comparison of size of nanomaterial with common materials B schematic illustration of low-dimensional nanostructures: zero-dimension (0D), one-dimension (1D), two-dimensions (2D), and three-dimensions (3D). Information was adapted and modify from A [22] B [23]

Bibliometrics is a helpful tool that offers direction for ongoing research and future studies worldwide. It uses quantitative and statistical analysis to explain how research papers are distributed within a particular topic, field, institution, and nation. They can offer a more thorough analysis to show research fields, development patterns or direction. Even though there has been significant growth in NMs research on remediation of air and water pollution, however, a comprehensive and systematic review on bibliometrics, NMs synthesis pathways, and reaction mechanism is still absent. Therefore, in this review paper, we investigated and analyzed literature in the past 10 years to better understand NMs application and research progress in air and water pollution treatment. Furthermore, we systematically discussed conventional and advanced technologies for the remediation of contaminants from air and water. Additionally, a brief overview of the importance of NMs, types, synthesis pathways, pros and cons, and mechanisms of reactions were discussed thoroughly. Finally, some shortcomings and recommendations of NMs for pollutant remediation were mentioned for future research directions.

Bibliometric analysis

The basic bibliometrics of research papers on air and water pollution remediation using NMs during 2013–2022 are shown in Fig. 2A. The results show that the number of related research papers on air pollution treatment using NMs has rapidly increased yearly from 2013 (224) to 2022 (732). A similar trend was observed for wastewater treatment using NMs in the last 10 years, with the total number of publications in 2013 (292) increasing to (1022) in 2022. It slightly decreases from 2020 to 2021 due to the corona pandemic. In this review, we follow a similar methodology to other bibliometric studies. Data were obtained from Thomson Reuters online science citation index (SCI) expanded databases of the web of science on 17th May 2022. Bibliometric analysis was done by searching in "Web of Science "for the words "Nanomaterial" (topic) and "air pollution treatment" (topic), and "wastewater treatment" (topic). Ten high-impact factors well famous international journals were included in our bibliometric analysis. Only journal research articles from top relevant journals related to NMs usage for the treatment of air and water pollution have been compiled for the bibliography. All the details of the articles, including title, year of publication, keywords, abstract, funding agencies, web of science categories of the article, and names of journals, were transferred into a spread excel sheet. VOS viewer software for creating and displaying bibliometric networks was used [24]. The affiliation of at least one author to the articles served as a proxy for the contributions of various institutions and nations, and the phrase "single country article" was applied when the researchers' addresses were from the same nation. Cite space 5 was applied in the co-citation analysis. The most co-cited article was thought to be the most populous work in this field and thought to be a pioneer or hot issue. Co-citation and author keyword analyses were conducted to identify the current hot topics and significant research trends. Co-citation occurs when two works are both cited in the same work. According to co-citation theory, the strength of co-citation between cited articles reflects their inherent association. Figure 2B and C presents the co-citation cluster's outcome of air and water pollution remediation. This analysis gives us a historical perspective on the development of intensive scientific research on a specific topic of sciences has over 100 branches in different cities, and articles divided into branches and would result in a different ranking.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Increase of studies on remediation of air and water pollution using nanomaterials from 2013 to 2022 B Distribution of studies using nanomaterials for air pollution remediation, and C Distribution of studies using nanomaterials for water pollution remediation (Data taken from Web of Science)

Remediation strategies

Conventional strategies

A wide range of treatment technologies has been developed to minimize the concentration of pollutants in the environment. These technologies are crucial in reducing the negative impact of pollution on the environment and human health. However, despite various treatment methods, their effectiveness varies, and they often have limitations such as low stability and high complexity [25]. In air treatment, several strategies, such as activated carbon adsorption and selective catalytic reduction, wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD), and activated carbon injection (ACI), have been utilized to reduce the concentration of pollutants [26, 27]. Likewise, water treatment techniques involve chemical, physical, thermal, mechanical, and biological methods [5, 28, 29]. Further techniques include wet oxidation, electrocoagulation, ion exchange, ozonolysis, Fenton, adsorption, extraction, flocculation/coagulation, evaporation, steam stripping, distillation, filtration, floatation, screening, sedimentation, reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, phytoremediation, bioaccumulation, biotransformation, and biomineralization [5, 30,31,32]. However, they often involve high capital and operational costs, and their efficiency is limited by membrane fouling, low selectivity, and the disposal of residual sludge [8, 30, 33]. To address the limitations of conventional treatment methods, researchers worldwide have focused on developing NMs as an alternative approach with strong oxidation power that can oxidize and mineralize various organic and inorganic contaminants. NMs have shown promising results in pollutant removal and have the potential to provide a low-cost and environmentally acceptable solution. Therefore, developing and implementing NMs in treatment processes can potentially revolutionize pollution control and management [26, 27].

Nanomaterial-based strategies

Inorganic nanomaterials

Metal and metal oxide-based nanomaterials

Metal and metal oxide based NMs are some of the most widely used inorganic NMs for removing various hazardous pollutants from the environment. All three variants of iron oxide, namely magnetite (Fe3O4), maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), and hematite (α-Fe2O3), have been thoroughly examined for their suitability in pollution treatment applications. However, among them the Fe3O4, and γ-Fe2O3 are metallic in nature [34]. The commonly used metal oxide NM is nano zerovalent iron (NZVI), which contains a shell of Fe(II), Fe(III), and zerovalent iron and an outer mixed iron oxides shell layer [35]. Nanocomposites (NCs) of metals and magnetic iron oxides such as Fe3O4, zinc iron oxide (ZnFe2O4), unidentified iron oxide (uFe2O4), manganese iron oxide (MnFe2O4), and cobalt iron oxide (CoFe2O4) have also been extensively studied for the removal of pollutants especially heavy metals from the environment (refer to Tables 1 and 2) due to their magnetic properties, excellent separation, recyclability, high specific surface areas, high adsorption, and high binding energies [36]. The magnetic iron oxide based NMs can efficiently disperse in water and can be quickly recovered by an external magnetic field. The ability to recycle and reuse are the most important parameters. However, their real applications are limited by aggregation and oxidation, and their magnetic phase can still leak in acidic environments [26]. Aggregation of magnetic iron oxide base NMs alters the magnetic properties and reduces surface energy [34]. Thus, the functionalization of iron oxide NMs with inorganic and organic material having adsorption properties are recommended in the literature because they prevent iron oxide from oxidation [17, 37]. Surface functionalization with functional groups like carboxylic group (–COOH) and (–NH2) groups has been observed to confer notable enhancements in terms of stability, adsorption efficiency, and surface area especially for chelating metal ions [34]. Furthermore, magnetic iron oxide NMs exhibit the distinctive advantage of being recoverable, regenerable, and reusable subsequent to their application in diverse contexts. The recovery of these NMs through the implementation of magnetic field is extensively reported in relevant literature [38]. Additionally, separation and regeneration techniques for NMs include thermal separation and pH adjustment depending on type of coating material or functional groups [39].

Table 1 Summary of mechanisms and removal efficiency of different organic and inorganic nanomaterials for air pollutants remediation
Table 2 Summary of experimental conditions, adsorption kinetic, removal efficiencies, and mechanisms of different organic and inorganic NMs for environmental pollutants remediation

Metal oxide NMs such as titanium oxide (TiO2), gold oxides (Au2O3), silica (SiO2), silver oxide (AgO), tin oxide (SnO2), zinc oxide (ZnO), alumina (Al2O3), manganese oxide (MnO), copper oxide (CuO), nickel oxide (NiO2), zirconium oxide (ZrO2) and vanadium oxide (V2O5), cesium oxide (CeO2), and magnesium oxide (MgO) encapsulated with carbon-bearing compounds (see Fig. 3) have been extensively studied for the remediation of pollutants [1, 40, 41]. These NMs are known for degrading contaminants through fast reaction rates, stability, availability, non-toxicity, high Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area, and polymorphic structures [42]. They also provide acidic groups necessary for heavy metal binding and protect the encapsulated NMs from aggregation and corrosion [43]. Furthermore, they can inactivate MOs when exposed to ultraviolent (UV) or solar radiation by producing reactive oxygen species such as the hydroxyl radical (OH•), superoxide radical (O2•), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [44]. Recent studies have shown that TiO2 NCs have significant reactivity and stability, making them successful in removing heavy metals, eliminating toxic pollutants by gas sensing, purifying indoor air by decomposing them into carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O), and developing oxidative absorbents for the atmosphere [26, 45]. In addition, the surface of metal and metal oxide base NMs can be easily functionalized using multiple ionic or ionizable groups that may enhance the binding efficiency toward different pollutants. Despite their effectiveness they have inadequate adsorption capacities and low selectivity and are easily deactivated by other aqueous contaminants severely, limiting their effectiveness in removing pollutants. To overcome these limitations, efforts should be made to improve their stability to prevent aggregation, oxidation, and magnetic phase leakage and enhance their recyclability. Additionally, standardizing the synthesis and characterization methods can enhance their efficiency. Furthermore, long-term toxicity studies are needed, focusing on real-life applications to optimize their use. It is essential to consider potential environmental risks and implement appropriate risk management strategies to ensure their safe use. Table 1 shows recent studies with organic and inorganic NMs for remediation of air pollutants from the environment while Table 2 shows recent studies with organic and inorganic NMs to remediate water pollutants.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic illustration of diverse types of nanomaterials based on composition employed for air and water pollutants nano remediation. Information was adapted and modify from [69,70,71]

Nano clays

Nanoclays are NMs commonly referred to as layered silicates or nanoclays minerals. They are a type of minerals distinguished by their widespread availability and cost-effectiveness. These minerals are characterized by the presence of layered structures comprising tetrahedral silicate sheets and octahedral hydroxide sheets that give them a plate-like structure [46]. Nanoclays are categorized by their distinct mineralogical compositions, as approximately 30 nano clays variants exist. Their specific attributes render them suitable for diverse applications, each hinging on their unique properties [47]. Among them, montmorillonite (MMT), rectorite (REC), vermiculite (VMT), and kaolinite clay (KC) stands as a prominent choice [48]. They have extensive utility in the enhancement of polymer matrices, to enhance mechanical, thermal, and barrier attributes under high temperature. Polymer chains have the capability to intercalate into the interlayers of clay, facilitating the dispersion of clay within the polymer matrix at a nanometer scale [49]. As the polymer permeates the interstitial gaps between the neighboring nanoclays layers, and the interlayer distance expands, leading to the formation of an intercalated structure [50] Nanoclays find application in diverse fields, including environmental pollution remediation, capitalizing on their attributes like elevated surface area, porosity, and mechanical robustness. However, when synthesizing nanoclays-polymer composites, meticulous attention to each phase is imperative. This is particularly crucial due to the propensity for nanoclays agglomeration and clustering upon introducing substantial quantities into resins. Additionally, an excess input of energy has been noted to trigger premature resin curing, culminating in the brittleness of the final composite products [51].

Carbon-based nanomaterials

Carbon-based NMs (CBNMs) are promising adsorbents due to their unique chemical and physical characteristics that enable them to remove organic and inorganic pollutants on a broad scale due to their high surface area and reactivity (see Fig. 3).

Carbon nanotubes

Among CBNMs carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have garnered significant attention in recent years due to their unique properties, including high porosity and surface area, high electronic conductivity, and excellent chemical, physical, and mechanical properties [52, 53]. Their highly durable nature and higher adsorption capability make them attractive candidates for various applications. Structurally, CNTs are one-dimensional NMs with cylindrical, sturdy membranous honeycomb lattice structures that effectively capture pollutants [54]. Based on the number of cylindrical shells, CNTs are divided into two groups: single-wall CNTs (SWCNTs) and multi-wall CNTs (MWCNTs) [55]. Numerous studies have investigated the practical applications of CNTs in environmental remediation (Table 2). However, the main obstacle to applying CNTs is their small particle size, difficulty in separation, and poor dispersion in the aqueous phase that significantly hinder their effectiveness. To overcome these challenges, loose clusters/aggregates containing interstitial gaps, grooves, and CNT membranes are widely used for water treatment due to their high adsorption energy sites for organic molecules [56, 57]. Researchers are also exploring techniques such as surface modifications and functionalization to improve the dispersion and separation of CNTs making them more effective for environmental remediation.

Graphene based nanomaterials

Graphene-based NMs (GBNMs) are derived from graphene, a two-dimensional carbon allotrope with a honeycomb lattice structure. They include various forms of graphene, such as graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), graphene quantum dots (GQDs), and graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) [58, 59]. Well, GBNMs possess unique properties, such as exceptional mechanical strength, high surface area, high electrical conductivity, and excellent thermal properties, which make them attractive for a wide range of applications, including electronics, energy storage, catalysis, and environmental remediation [40, 43]. The functionalization of GBNMs with various functional groups can also enhance their properties and increase adsorption capacities. Various researchers used graphene based NMs for the adsorption of heavy metals (refer to Table 2). However, it is essential to consider the potential environmental risks associated with GBNMs [60]. To minimize the potential risks associated with GBNMs, strategies such as improving their synthesis, functionalization methods, developing effective monitoring and detection techniques, and establishing regulations for their safe use and disposal have been proposed. Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects of GBNMs on the environment and living organisms [56, 57]. Likewise, carbon fullerenes have several unique properties that make them attractive for environmental remediation. With the ability to act as electron acceptors or donors, fullerenes can effectively degrade pollutants through various mechanisms such as photo-induced electron transfer, radical generation, and singlet oxygen generation [61, 62].

Carbon quantum dots

Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) are a class of carbon-based NMs that have garnered significant attention due to their promising potential in various environmental remediation applications. They were accidentally discovered while separating other CNTs. These CQDs have special properties like large surface area, customizable fluorescence, and exceptional biocompatibility. These attributes collectively make them highly attractive candidates for a range of applications aimed at addressing environmental challenges thus, CQDs have shown great potential for detecting and removing heavy metals, organic pollutants, and antibiotics from contaminated water sources [63, 64]. CQDs include carbon nanodots (CNDs) and GQDs with fascinating optical properties, such as photoluminescence, and chemiluminescence [65]. They can be synthesized using two methods: the top-down approach and the bottom-up approach. The degree of oxygen content in the oxidized CQDs varies from 5 to 50%, based on the chosen synthesis method. Additionally, they can also detect environmental contaminants through fluorescence quenching and biosensing applications [66, 67]. Two primary categories of fluorescence emission mechanisms have been advanced to explain the characteristics of CQDs. The first category revolves around bandgap transitions resulting from conjugated p-domains, whereas the second category encompasses more intricate origins associated with surface defects present in CQDs [63, 68]. Their low toxicity and biodegradability make them an attractive substitute for conventional remediation techniques. However, a comprehensive exploration is imperative to grasp their complete potential for extensive deployment in environmental remediation endeavors [64, 66].

Organic nanomaterials

Polymer-based nanomaterials

Among organic NMs natural polymers have been extensively investigated for their potential in environmental remediation owing to their high surface area, poly-functional groups, and superior adsorption and chelating capabilities [72, 73]. Cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin are the most abundant polymers found in nature and constitute the major components of plant fibers [74, 75]. In addition, easy availability, abundance, and low cost made them attractive bio-based raw materials for NMs synthesis. The synthesis pathway of polymeric NMs is illustrated in Fig. 4A. Cellulose is a linear polysaccharide consisting of repeating D-glucopyranose units joined by glycosidic linkages, making up 30–50% of polymers [76]. It contains functional groups such as methylol and hydroxyl, which make it attractive for inactivating microparticles and metal nanoparticles (NPs) [77, 78]. The presence of six hydroxyl groups per cellobiose unit enhances its adsorption capacity. Increasing the surface roughness of cellulose is necessary for creating composites with better properties [79]. Likewise, hemicelluloses, comprising 20–35% of lignocellulosic biomass, link cellulose and lignin and control cellulose microfibril aggregation [80]. Hemicelluloses contain a variety of neutral sugars and have a β-(1 → 4) backbone like cellulose, and their molecular heterogeneity modulates interactions with cellulose microfibrils through intermolecular interactions and covalent linkages with lignin [81].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Schematic illustration of A schematic illustration of synthesis procedure of green and polymer base NMs, and B MOFs and MOF-based materials compared to bulk materials and nanomaterial for adsorption of pollutants. Information was adapted and modify from A [96, 97] and, B [98]

The third prevalent polymer is lignin (15–30%), obtained from black liquor from various plant sources [76, 82]. It is an aromatic compound with several functional groups linked by C–C and C–O bonds and has a nanocrystalline heterogeneous structure refer to Fig. 4A [83]. Lignin can be modified through depolymerization to produce newer monomers for developing NMs with inherent properties such as antioxidants, antimicrobial, and UV absorption [84]. Chemical treatments alter polymers properties and enhance organic substance adsorption, with virgin fibers having 20–50 mmol/g capacity and unmodified fibers having 400–1000 mmol/g capacity depending on solute composition and alteration sequence [5]. Polymer-based nanofiber was widely used for water treatment with heavy metals. An overview is shown in Table 2. However, despite having a wide surface area, polymer NMs have limited ability for adsorption of cationic dyes and remaining metals due to a lack of suitable reactive functional groups. To improve adsorbent selectivity the surface polarity and hydrophilicity can be increased by adding additional functional groups. Furthermore, chemical modifications of polymers can improve their hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity, flexibility, microbial resistance, water absorbency, adsorptive or ion exchange, and thermal resistance, ultimately improving their capabilities. Although polymeric NMs require further research, to fully realize the potential of polymeric NMs for environmental remediation.

Dendrimers

The term dendrimers, is derived from the Greek word dendra means “tree” and meros means “part” are intricate synthetic polymers characterized by their highly branched, tree-like structure, offer a versatile platform for diverse functionalities and applications. Dendrimers are built either by divergent approach or convergent method [85]. Operating at the nanoscale, dendrimers grabbed attention in the field of drugs and gene delivery. Furthermore, these materials exhibit the potential to revolutionize environmental remediation practices [86]. Notably, dendrimers can serve as efficacious adsorbent to purify water and air by sequestering contaminants. Through strategic functionalization with specific chemical groups like amino, carboxyl, or hydroxyl, dendrimers acquire distinctive surface properties, enabling selective interactions with environmental pollutants such as heavy metals, organic compounds, and dyes [87]. Furthermore, dendrimers demonstrate a propensity to act as carriers for metal chelating agents and other remediation substances, facilitating precise transport to polluted sites for targeted intervention. Moreover, these polymers can be ingeniously engineered to function as sensors, enabling the detection and continuous monitoring of environmental pollution [88]. Amidst their potential, it is paramount to conduct comprehensive research to fine-tune their properties, assess potential risks, and ascertain environmental repercussions. Overall, dendrimers stand as a potent asset in the realm of environmental remediation, presenting a pathway towards a cleaner and safer ecosystem. Their versatile functionalities, ability to selectively interact with contaminants, and potential for tailored delivery make them a promising avenue for driving positive change in our environment [89]. Nonetheless, inadequately delineated chemical structures are a major problem associated with dendrimers. To enhance physicochemical and biological attributes researchers are making attempts through nanotechnology with the aims to elevate solubilization bolster bioavailability, and ultimately address the poorly defined structures [90].

Composite nanomaterials

Metal–organic frameworks

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), or coordination polymers, are crystalline porous materials composed of metal ions or clusters linked by organic ligands to form a 3D structure Fig. 4B [91]. These materials possess various attractive properties, including porosity, tunability, high surface area, and pore size, that facilitate the efficient diffusion of contaminants into the framework [92]. The adaptability of MOF structures is another key advantage, as they can be easily modified by changing the type of metal ion, linkers, and post-synthetic modifications [93]. Moreover, MOFs can be functionalized with chemical groups that selectively adsorb specific contaminants, such as heavy metals, organic pollutants, and gases. Combining MOFs with other materials such as metals, metal oxides, polymers, graphene, and others can create heterogeneous materials that exhibit improved stability over the original MOFs [94]. These MOF-based materials can take different forms, such as hydrogels, aerogels, beads, membranes, and spheres [95]. Due to their unique structural characteristics, MOFs and MOF-based NMs have been extensively investigated for their potential to remediate various air and water pollutants. They have also been studied as catalysts for photo- or electrocatalytic CO2 reduction, a rapidly developing field of research [92]. However, MOFs suffer from certain limitations that can impede their practical application. These include structural instability, high production costs, and toxicity risks. Research has been directed towards developing functional MOF-based NMs to overcome these challenges and optimize the potential in various applications. Future investigations could explore the development of stable production methods, cost-effective production techniques, alternative ligands and metals, and hybrid materials to unlock the full potential of MOFs in environmental remediation and other areas of use.

Nanocomposite membranes

Nano-composite membranes (NCMs) are a new breed of adsorbents and membranes made of polymeric and non-polymeric materials, such as metals and ceramics [5]. These membranes have numerous applications in environmental remediation and pollution control because of their superior properties, such as improved mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties, increased hydrophilicity, and effective removal of pollutants such as dyes, heavy metals, and antibacterial capabilities [59, 99]. The NCMs encompass several types, such as inorganic–organic hybrid, polymeric, ultrafine, CNT, polymeric, and MOF membranes. These membranes can be created by incorporating various types of nanoparticles (NPs), including TiO2, Al2O3, ZrO2, CNTs, Ag, SiO2, MOF, covalent organic framework (COF), and NZVI, into the polymeric membrane matrix as shown in Fig. 5A–D. This incorporation leads to a notable improvement in the performance of the NCMs, such as enhanced functionality, thermal stability, and microbial inactivation properties, while maintaining the structural integrity of the membrane [100]. The fabrication process of NCMs typically involves mixing the polymer matrix and inorganic NPs together, followed by casting or electrospinning the mixture into a membrane as shown in Fig. 5C and D. The properties of the membrane can be fine-tuned by varying the type, size, and concentration of NPs and polymer matrix [101, 102]. Interfacial polymerization and phase inversion methods are two widely used techniques in the fabrication process of NCMs. In interfacial polymerization, the reaction occurs between monomers present in different phases at the interface between them, which leads to a thin, uniform polymer layer on the surface of NPs. This method is beneficial when synthesizing inorganic–organic hybrid and MOF membranes. On the other hand, phase inversion methods involve converting a homogeneous polymer solution into a porous membrane structure by manipulating the thermodynamics of the polymer solution refer to Fig. 5C and D [53, 103]. This process includes dissolving the polymer in a suitable solvent, casting it onto a substrate, and extracting or evaporating the solvent, forming a porous membrane structure. This method is well-suited for fabricating polymeric and CNT membranes [104]. Other techniques, such as layer-by-layer assembly, sol–gel or chemical vapor deposition can also fabricate NCMs with specific properties. Although the use of NCMs deteriorates a wide range of pollutants, however, they tend to leach out and aggregate, especially if they are grafted on a membrane without surface protection, which could make the process more difficult and low contaminants degradation. Thus, to address the disadvantages, future research can focus on improving selectivity, stability, and durability of NCMs. Furthermore, to exploring new types of NMs and advanced characterization techniques, and developing sustainable and cost-effective fabrication methods for large-scale production.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Schematic illustration of nano composite membranes A flat sheath, B hollow fiber nano composite membranes, C, D synthesis steps of nanocomposite membranes, and E nano sensors for air and water pollutants remediation. Information was adapted and modify from A [105] B [106] C [107] and, D [108]

Nano sensors

Nano sensors empowered by NMs allow precise detection and remediation of environmental pollutants at the nanomolar to sub-picomolar scales. Nano sensors are energy converters at nanoscales that can recognize and detect chemical, machinal, and physical phenomena at the nanoscale in the environment and give an electrical or optical signal as output. Nano sensors comprise a specificity-enhancing recognition component and a signal transmission technique that enable them to confirm the presence of an analyte [17]. Nano sensors are susceptible, with high detection power and capacity to monitor multiple tasks at once, and they can easily suspend in the air for a long time to collect information through their wireless and send it to a central base. With the use of nano sensors, air pollution has been effectively controlled. Nano sensors of CNTs, SnO2, Pt, Cu, Ag, and CQDs have been reported to remove toxic gases and heavy metals from the environment. Furthermore, nano sensors of NCs coated with gold (Au), silica oxide (SiO2), zinc (Zn), and lead (Pb) have been reported to detect heavy metals in drinking water.

Available pathways to synthesize nanomaterials

Traditional pathways

Traditionally, NMs can be synthesized in two different ways chemical and physical synthesis pathway. Chemical synthesis includes liquid and gas phase pathways, as shown in Fig. 6A. Among them liquid phase methods include colloidal methods, precipitation, sol–gel, coprecipitation, solvothermal, water–oil microemulsions, hydrothermal methods, chemical reduction, polyol approach, and radiolytic method, while gas phase includes pyrolysis and inert gas condensation method [145]. Furthermore, ionotropic gelation and microemulsion methods are also used to synthesize NMs using polyelectrolytes, enzymatic treatment, ultrasonic, acid hydrolysis, chemo-mechanical therapy, and nanoprecipitation. Physical synthesis utilizes various physical processes to create structures with unique properties and characteristics. Similarly, the two different ways of synthesis as already discussed in subheading "Carbon quantum dots" (top-down and bottom-up strategy). Top-down strategy utilizes mechanical processes such as milling, grinding, or etching to reduce bulk materials into smaller particles. In contrast, bottom-up strategy involves assembling smaller units, such as atoms, molecules, or NPs, into larger structures. Production techniques such as lithography, etching, and exfoliation are used in top-down strategy, while wet chemical precipitation, sol–gel, chemical vapor deposition, hydrothermal, sputtering, template growth, electrospinning, and atomic layer deposition are used in bottom-up techniques. Traditional pathways present limitations and disadvantages, such as high energy requirements, special equipment, and high costs [15, 132]. These challenges can be overcome by introducing functional groups to the surface of NMs in various ways to improve their effectiveness, selectivity, and sensitivity. These methods include creating chemical bonds between the modifier and NMs surfaces or physically adsorbing the modifying species to the NM surface [132]. However, the chemicals used in these processes can be corrosive, toxic, and flammable, posing significant environmental problems [104]. Furthermore, the traditional pathways are toxic and costive; therefore, it is foreseen that green and polymer base NMs will emerge as a hotspot for future research studies, especially on industrial-scale applications. Therefore, it is recommended to adopt simple and reliable alternative methods such as synthesis and use of green based NMs for NMs synthesis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Graphical illustration of general procedures for nanomaterial synthesis. A traditional pathways and, B biological pathways. Information was adapted and modify from [151, 152]

Biological pathways

To achieve more sustainable and eco-friendlier NMs production, scientists have started exploring the use of less hazardous and toxic chemicals in the manufacturing process [146, 147]. Green and biobased NMs production has gained attention as a promising alternative to molecular solvents due to its potential to remediate environmental pollution cost-effectively and sustainably. This is achieved by using non-toxic precursors and environmentally friendly solvents during the synthesis process, which minimizes the production of harmful byproducts [148]. It involves extracting various biological materials, including bacteria, fungi, algae, yeast, green extracts, proteins, polysaccharides, nitrates reductase, coenzymes, biosurfactants, and hemicellulose biomass to produce a wide variety of sizes and forms of NMs [16] shown in Fig. 6B. Some of the most important environmental features of biologically synthesized NMs are biodegradability, sustainability, and environment friendly, as they rely on renewable resources and reduce the use of hazardous chemicals [72]. Plants raw materials possess various functional groups with reducing capabilities and phytochemicals that can serve as coating agents to stabilize the NMs and facilitate multidimensional absorption. Valuable plant materials such as leaves, roots, flowers, and fruit have been investigated for their potential to produce NMs [149, 150]. For instance, plant leaf extracts contain a range of phytochemicals, including alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, carotenoids, vitamins, minerals, amino acids, sterols, glycosides, alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolics saponins, and phenolic compounds which act as reducing agents to eliminate toxic chemicals, MOs, and hazardous pollutants in environment [83, 113]. Compared to chemically synthesized counterparts, biologically synthesized NMs offer a higher potential for sustainable growth and environmental remediation. Recently biologically synthesized NMs have widely reported holding significant potential for effectively mitigating environmental pollution and promoting sustainable development (refer to Table 3). Future studies should prioritize investigating the scalability, cost-effectiveness, and safety considerations of biologically synthesized NMs to enable their widespread commercialization and adoption in industries.

Table 3 Summary of experimental conditions, adsorption kinetic, removal efficiencies and mechanisms of different organic and inorganic NMs for environmental pollutants remediation

Mechanisms for pollution remediation using nanomaterials

The fundamental principles utilized in remediating environmental pollution encompass three main approaches: physical, chemical, and biological treatments. Each approach operates through specific reaction mechanisms. Physical treatment involves adsorption and radiation mechanisms, chemical treatment employs oxidation and reduction mechanisms, while biological treatment includes disinfection using aerobic and anaerobic microbes, and enzymatic processes [170].

Adsorption

Adsorption is a widely used technique to eradicate air and water pollutants. It is an excellent practical approach and lacks toxic by-products to mitigate organic and inorganic pollutants [40]. Adsorbents are developed using altered, unaltered and enhanced NMs encompassing polymers, activated carbon, MOF, molecular sieves, zeolites, and other economically viable substances. The selection of a specific adsorbent hinges primarily upon its inherent adsorption capacity and the materials intrinsic affinity for the targeted compound [171, 172]. The adsorption process involves separating chemicals from one phase and concentrating them on the surface of another adsorbent material [12]. Adsorption occurs in three steps: (1) interaction of an adsorbed species with an absorbent in interface with a liquid state and a solid phase of different compositions at a constant temperature and pressure over a specific duration of time. (2) The adsorbent and liquid layer are separated after the reaction, and (3) the adsorbent material in the supernatant liquid state and any pressurized fluid phase are measured [15, 21]. The mechanism is presented in Fig. 7A. The adsorption rate of adsorbate is primarily influenced by two crucial factors, namely adsorption isotherms, and kinetics, which represent the adsorbent's adsorption effectiveness and establish the adsorption parameters. Thus, a thorough grasp on thermodynamic and kinetic aspects is necessary. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models and the pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, and intraparticle diffusion models are key isotherm and kinetic models commonly used to describe the adsorption process [83]. Through kinetic analysis, we can determine the residence time required for completion of adsorption reaction, and kinetic information aids in sizing the adsorption equipment appropriately. It also evaluating the efficacy of fixed-bed systems or other flow-through setups [172]. Adsorption is widely recognized as the primary mechanism for removing heavy metals, dyes, and other pollutants. Previous studies have proposed four distinct adsorption mechanisms: ion exchange, electrostatic adsorption, surface physical adsorption, and complexation/chelation [40, 75]. The adsorbed substance is classified as either physisorption or chemisorption. Physical or physisorption usually adsorbate adheres through van der Waals (weak intermolecular) interactions. In contrast, chemisorption involves the formation of strong chemical bonds between the adsorbate and the adsorbent surface [8, 173]. Electrostatic interactions, π-π and hydrophobic interactions, acid–base interactions, and van der Waals interactions all play a crucial role in determining the efficacy of nano adsorbents in absorbing organic compounds, complex compounds, and heavy metals. The NMs surface offers many active sites for interaction with various chemical species due to its small size, high surface area, and surface multi-functionalities [10, 174]. Many factors influence the adsorption efficiency of hazardous pollutants, e.g., pH, operating temperature, amount of adsorbent, suspended particles, surface charge, concentration of adsorbent and adsorbate and contacting time (discussed in our previous study) [175]. Each of these factors needs meticulous optimization in order to determine efficiency of absorbent. In recent studies, the adsorption capacity onto NMs was reported to strongly influenced by the pH of the solution specifically, increase in pH because it was observed to promotes adsorption when the surface of the adsorbent has a negative charge [15, 174]. The underlying mechanisms of this process involve molecular diffusion and surface binding. Conversely, when the pH is lower, and the surface of the adsorbent becomes positively charged, the adsorption of pollutants slows down due to reduced electrostatic attraction. It is crucial to control solution conditions for fine-tuning adsorption efficiency and enhance adsorbents effectiveness. As suggested in literature, incorporating NMs by blending them with adsorbents can improve the attraction between the desired substances and the adsorbents. These insights can enhance the design and optimization of nano adsorbents for more effective removal of pollutants from contaminated resources [43, 100].

Fig. 7
figure 7

A adsorption mechanism B filtration mechanism, C disinfection mechanism, D photocatalytic mechanism, and E oxidation mechanism of different pollutants with NMs. Illustrations were adapted for modification from [5, 35, 41, 175, 189, 198]

Membrane filtration

Membrane filtration serves as a fundamental technique for segregating pollutants using porous materials or membranes that selectively allow desired particles or substances to pass while retaining others [176]. In recent times, membrane filtration has garnered significant interest for being a cost-effective and highly efficient method. The filtration process is influenced by factors like particle size, surface charge, solute hydrophilicity, and shape. Traditional membrane filters are typically crafted from petroleum-derived polymers like polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and glass fibers [177, 178]. The filtration mechanism in membranes occurs through physical capturing processes such as sieving, inertial impaction, interception, and diffusion. The four straightforward physical capturing processes of sieving, inertial impaction, interception, and diffusion are primarily used to fulfill filtration functions [179]. The mechanism is presented in Fig. 7B. Brownian motion can describe the filtration mechanism of nanometer-sized particles, but it is unlikely to be a sufficient mechanism for filtration on its own. Brownian motion causes some particles to diffuse toward the surface and deposit as they pass on both sides of the membrane filter. This happens when particles pass at a distance for collision by inertia or interception [178,179,180].

However, membrane filter properties can be fine-tuned using fabrication methods involving the integration of NMs and polymers. These modifications play a pivotal role in enhancing membrane performance and mitigating fouling. By incorporating or blending of NMs like Ag, SiO2, TiO2, ZnO, CNTs, polymers base NMs, metal oxides, halloysites, and more, membrane characteristics can be adjusted. This infusion introduces functional groups and heightens hydrophilicity and adsorption capabilities, thereby bolstering their efficacy in rejecting contaminants [179]. This leads to improved removal of MOs and noxious pollutants. Notably, photocatalytic NMs, in particular, exhibit substantial promise in eradicating toxic pollutants through photo degradation [180, 181]. However, they only target solid particles and cannot capture and remove other toxic contaminants, and when disposed of, might result in secondary pollution. Recent research is focusing on creating hybrid membranes with incorporation of NMs. Furthermore, modification of membranes was reported to enhance removal of harmful pollutants [182, 183]. The suggested modification enhancements reported in literature involve surface modification to improved selectivity and hydrophilicity and interfacial polymerization to enhance strength, and chemical/thermal stability while also offering features like anti-fouling properties, self-cleaning ability, selectivity, and the capacity to combat microbes. They provide a high flow rate under low pressure conditions and allow for easy recovery and reuse of the NMs [176,177,178].

Disinfection

Well, NMs have been used as disinfectants due to their non-specific mode of action to remove organic and inorganic contaminants and inactivate various types of MOs, such as viruses, protozoa, and bacteria [13]. Conventional disinfectants, such as chloramines, ozone, chlorine, chlorine dioxide, and chlorine gas, can effectively prevent microbial growth, but they have short-lived reactivity and can present problems since they can produce toxic, carcinogenic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) [184, 185]. NMs successfully overcome drawbacks that prevented the viability of conventional disinfection and have established themselves as effective disinfecting agents in environmental remediation. NMs exhibit such behaviors due to their improved interfacial charge separation, increased surface area, solution chemistry, and transport behavior, which provide more active sites and prevent DBPs production, thus increasing disinfection [186]. Additionally, NMs are highly stable and can remain active for extended periods, reducing the need for frequent reapplication [187]. Many NMs have been proposed to inhibit the growth of microbes in air and water, including CNTs, chitosan, fullerene, TiO2, MgO, ZnO, AgO, and zerovalent NMs.

The disinfection mechanism operates through the adherence of NMs (such as ZnO + , Ag + , Ti +) to the lipopolysaccharide layer within the external cell walls of target microbes. This interaction induces oxidative stress (ROS), which subsequently degrades the peptidoglycan layer, triggering peroxidation of the lipid membrane. Consequently, oxidation extends to the membrane proteins, inducing alterations in membrane characteristics that prompt the release of cations [188]. Even at low concentrations, these cations initiate a biological response. They incapacitate bacterial respiratory enzymes by binding to functional groups like thiol groups in proteins, inducing damage to microbial cells by disrupting DNA, oxidizing lipids, peroxidizing proteins, and impeding cellular respiration [189]. This sequence ultimately leads to the malfunction of the cellular respiration process and peroxidation of polyunsaturated phospholipid components in the cell membrane, culminating in cell death [186, 188]. Moreover, the interactions between cations and DNA can inhibit replication and create structural alterations in the cell envelope [104]. The mechanism is presented in Fig. 7C.

Photocatalysis

Photocatalysis has emerged as an effective and environmentally friendly process for the degradation of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), endocrine disrupting chemicals, heavy metals, insecticides, acetaldehyde, nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), ammonia (NH3), carbon monoxide (CO), mercury (Hg), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) [18, 117, 167, 190]. This process enhances chemical reactions that transform toxic air pollutants into non-toxic gases and in their powder form often result in complete mineralization. However, it still has drawbacks such as poor recovery and secondary contamination [103, 190]. The process mechanism involves the use of a light source to activate a wide-bandgap semiconductor materials, such as TiO2, ZnO, SnO2, cadmium sulfide, and tungsten trioxide, in the presence of water, causes electron separation, and develops an electron–hole pair [5, 41]. The photocatalysis mechanism entails several steps starting with photoexcitation that triggers a series of oxidative and reductive reactions on the surface of the photocatalyst upon exposure to an appropriate wavelength of light (often with photon energy (hv) more significant than or equal to the band gap energy) [149, 191]. Subsequently, the electrons diffuse across the photocatalyst's interface and interact with the surroundings, leading to reductions and oxidations [192, 193]. Photocatalytic oxidation involves the use of a catalyst activated by an energy source to facilitate reactions that rely on the production of highly reactive radical species such as OH and O2 , which are potent oxidizing agents that are generated through a reaction between photogenerated electrons and molecular oxygen and between photogenerated holes and water, that non-selectively destroys all organic contaminants [92, 194]. The mechanism is presented in Fig. 7D. The photocatalysis approach can be divided into two categories: homogeneous photocatalysis (photo-Fenton reaction), which responds up to a light wavelength of 600 nm, and heterogeneous photocatalysis (Fenton reaction), which does not entail any light irradiation [35]. In the context of large-scale applications, the photocatalytic performance of nano catalysts may be hindered by the presence of complex chemical mixtures and prolonged irradiation periods. Several strategies have been developed to overcome these limitations to enhance nano catalysts photocatalytic performance. These include introducing anionic and transition metal dopants and tailoring the surface properties of the nano catalysts. Dopants such as sulfur, fluorine, carbon, and nitrogen can modify the electronic structure of the nano catalysts and increase the number of active sites, resulting in higher efficiency. Nanofibers or nanotubes can also increase the surface area, while plasmonic materials such as Au or Ag NPs can enhance light absorption [103, 190]. Moreover, the incorporation of blended photocatalysts with supportive materials is a well-regarded approach in the literature. This technique not only enhances the recoverability of photocatalytic agents but also mitigates the potential for secondary contamination. As a result, it facilitates the attainment of desirable attributes such as recyclability, reusability, and an extended lifespan of the photocatalytic components.

Oxidation

Organic and inorganic compounds can be oxidized by using NMs that produce active oxygen species such as superoxides and hydroxyl radicles. Commonly used metal oxides for oxidation are MnO2, V2O5, CuO, TiO2, ZrO2, and CeO2 [26, 41]. Oxidation is a process in which oxygen-containing groups are created on NMs by splitting the reaction media and is typically carried out using an oxidizing agent e.g., H2O2, potassium permanganate (KMnO4), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and one or more inorganic acids such as nitric acid (HNO3) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in a refluxing state [41, 192]. The reaction mechanism of oxidation is still not fully understood, and the relevance of the particle size and surface morphology is still under debate. The mechanism of oxidation is presented in Fig. 7E. It was stated in literature that the mechanism of oxidation produces ROS such as (OH, O2, SO4•−), and singlet oxygen (1O2) to improve the degradation of organic contaminants. For the decontamination process to take place, the production of these radicals need to be adequate [195, 196]. Different metal oxide NMs can remove gases and metals from the air using liquid-phase, gas-phase, and combined-phase oxidation methods that can be achieved by heating or plasma treatment in the presence of oxygen gas [54]. Well, liquid-phase oxidation is a more common method for removing metals and functionalizing products while advanced oxidation processes (AOP) are also a significant component of liquid-phase oxidation. The commonly used gaseous oxidants include ozone (O3), chlorine dioxide (ClO2), and non-thermal plasma [8, 100, 169]. Transitional metals such as (Fe, Co, Ti, Zr, V, Mn, Cu, and Ce) are widely used to simultaneously remove toxic gases and heavy metals from the air by catalytic oxidation. These metals have large holes and favor redox reactions for electron transfer, resulting in lower reaction activation energy. Metals can be doped or impregnated onto or into the substrate material to enhance the surface area of the catalyst and increase its reactivity in both oxidation and reduction of heavy metals and gases, improving their resistance to gases and water [26, 197]. So far, various oxidants are commonly used to eliminate harmful gases from the atmosphere, including chlorine-based and sulfur-based compounds, O3, and H2O2 [26]. Some oxidative absorbents are highly reactive and safe to use, with no toxicity, such as ClO2, hypochlorite (ClO), chlorite (ClO2), and chlorate (ClO3). Additionally, persulfate (PS, S2O2) and permonosulfate (PMS, SO2) are also recommended for their ease of storage and transport [18, 197]. The reaction mechanism of oxidation is still not fully understood, and the relevance of the particle size and surface morphology is still under debate. The mechanism of oxidation is presented in Fig. 7E. It was stated in literature that the mechanism of oxidation usually takes place between chemisorption of CO and dissociative adsorbed oxygen. For the decontamination process to take place, the production of the radicals needs to be adequate.

Future strategies for appropriate eco-safe nano remediation

Although NMs are widely used for the remediation of environmental pollutants, they may still have unintentional adverse effects on human health and the environment when released in massive quantities and accumulate in the food chain. Therefore, it is crucial to develop sustainable technologies that can reliably remediate pollutants while minimizing the risk to human health and the environment. The efficient application of NMs for remediating toxic pollutants requires careful consideration of their advantages and disadvantages and their dispersion and retention properties. Each type of NMs has unique advantages and disadvantages, making it challenging to determine which is best suited for environmental remediation.

Chemically synthesized NMs have been proven harmful to human health and the ecosystem, making it necessary to develop sustainable, effective, and powerful NMs for environmental remediation. While polymer and green-based NMs are still being studied on a laboratory scale. Scientists have been using supporting materials such as plant waste and polymers to modify the structure and composition of NMs to boost their efficacy. Low-cost and readily available sources such as bone char, charcoal ash, fly ash, rice hull ash, and pomegranate cover can be used as absorbents and supporting materials to enhance efficiency and minimize the drawbacks of chemically synthesized NMs [6, 199, 200]. Comparing the adsorption capacity of each NM is difficult as the parameters and adsorbates employed are always different. However, various NMs have been found to have strong metal ion sorption abilities. Furthermore, research is needed to coat NMs, allowing them with surfactant to reach pollutants and destroy themselves after performing their job, such as coating them with a surfactant. The use of NMs for environmental remediation must be approached strategically, considering their impact on human health and the environment, to ensure appropriate and eco-safe remediation. In addition, the utilization efficiency, engineering investments, and operational expenses associated with each type of NM must be compared to determine the most suitable approach.

Conclusions

This systematic review highlights the immense potential of NMs for mitigating environmental pollutants. NMs offer a promising avenue for addressing environmental pollution, displaying potential advantages over conventional methods. This review covers the following aspects. Discussion on both conventional and advanced pollutant removal techniques, emphasizing the potential of NMs in this context. Exploration of NMs types, encompassing inorganic variants (metal and metal oxides, nanoclays), carbon-based, graphene based, carbon quantum dots, organic counterparts (polymer-based, and dendrimers) and nano composites (MOFs, NCMs, and nano sensors). Evaluation of diverse synthesis pathways, encompassing traditional methods (chemical and physical) as well as biological synthesis routes for NMs. Elaboration on reaction mechanisms facilitated by NMs in pollutant removal, encompassing adsorption, filtration, disinfection, photocatalysis, and oxidation and provision of strategic insights for future research strategies.

Availability of data and materials

The authors would like to confirm the availability of data and materials associated with the manuscript and fully support the importance of data transparency and reproducibility in scientific research.

References

  1. Ji B. Towards environment-sustainable wastewater treatment and reclamation by the non-aerated microalgal-bacterial granular sludge process: recent advances and future directions. Sci Total Environ. 2022;806: 150707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Del Prado-Audelo ML, García Kerdan I, Escutia-Guadarrama L, Reyna-González JM, Magaña JJ, Leyva-Gómez G. Nanoremediation: nanomaterials and nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.793765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. González-Martín J, Kraakman NJR, Pérez C, Lebrero R, Muñoz R. A state–of–the-art review on indoor air pollution and strategies for indoor air pollution control. Chemosphere. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ju MJ, Oh J, Choi YH. Changes in air pollution levels after COVID-19 outbreak in Korea. Sci Total Environ. 2021;750: 141521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu F, Astruc D. Nanocatalysts and other nanomaterials for water remediation from organic pollutants. Coord Chem Rev. 2020;408: 213180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Visa M. Synthesis and characterization of new zeolite materials obtained from fly ash for heavy metals removal in advanced wastewater treatment. Powder Technol. 2016;294:338–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.02.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Saydeh SA, El-Naas MH, Zaidi SJ. Copper removal from industrial wastewater: a comprehensive review. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;56:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Almomani F, Bhosale R, Khraisheh M, Kumar A, Almomani T. Heavy metal ions removal from industrial wastewater using magnetic nanoparticles (MNP). Appl Surf Sci. 2020;506: 144924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144924.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvarez PJJ, Chan CK, Elimelech M, Halas NJ, Villagrán D. Emerging opportunities for nanotechnology to enhance water security. Nat Nanotechnol. 2018;13:634–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0203-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Tian J, Li Y, Sun N, Mi S, Xie Y, Chen Z. Enhanced dyes adsorption from wastewater via Fe3O4 nanoparticles functionalized activated carbon. J Hazard Mater. 2019;373:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh A, Pal DB, Mohammad A, Alhazmi A, Haque S, Yoon T, Srivastava N, Gupta VK. Biological remediation technologies for dyes and heavy metals in wastewater treatment: new insight. Bioresour Technol. 2022;343: 126154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheriyamundath S, Vavilala SL. Nanotechnology-based wastewater treatment. Water Environ J. 2021;35:123–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Najafpoor A, Norouzian-Ostad R, Alidadi H, Rohani-Bastami T, Davoudi M, Barjasteh-Askari F, Zanganeh J. Effect of magnetic nanoparticles and silver-loaded magnetic nanoparticles on advanced wastewater treatment and disinfection. J Mol Liq. 2020;303: 112640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xue S, Xiao Y, Wang G, Fan J, Wan K, He Q, Gao M, Miao Z. Adsorption of heavy metals in water by modifying Fe3O4 nanoparticles with oxidized humic acid. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2021;616: 126333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Corsi I, Winther-Nielsen M, Sethi R, Punta C, Della Torre C, Libralato G, Lofrano G, Sabatini L, Aiello M, Fiordi L, Cinuzzi F, Caneschi A, Pellegrini D, Buttino I. Ecofriendly nanotechnologies and nanomaterials for environmental applications: key issue and consensus recommendations for sustainable and ecosafe nanoremediation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;154:237–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abouzeid RE, Khiari R, El-Wakil N, Dufresne A. Current state and new trends in the use of cellulose nanomaterials for wastewater treatment. Biomacromol. 2019;20:573–97. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00839.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Willner MR, Vikesland PJ. Nanomaterial enabled sensors for environmental contaminants Prof Ueli Aebi, Prof Peter Gehr. J Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-018-0419-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Magudieshwaran R, Ishii J, Raja KCN, Terashima C, Venkatachalam R, Fujishima A, Pitchaimuthu S. Green and chemical synthesized CeO2 nanoparticles for photocatalytic indoor air pollutant degradation. Mater Lett. 2019;239:40–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bourdrel T, Annesi-Maesano I, Alahmad B, Maesano CN, Bind MA. The impact of outdoor air pollution on covid-19: a review of evidence from in vitro, animal, and human studies. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0242-2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadegh H, Ali GAM, Gupta VK, Makhlouf ASH, Shahryari-ghoshekandi R, Nadagouda MN, Sillanpää M, Megiel E. The role of nanomaterials as effective adsorbents and their applications in wastewater treatment. J Nanostruct Chem. 2017;7:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-017-0219-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rafatullah M, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, Ahmad A. Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2010;177:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Ward. Development, synthesis and characterization of multifunctional nanomaterials, 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ward-Brullot/publication/263723744_Development_synthesis_and_characterization_of_multifunctional_nanomaterials/links/0f31753bbff1c9014b000000/Development-synthesis-and-characterization-of-multifunctional-nanomaterials.

  23. Ivanova N, Gugleva V, Dobreva M, Pehlivanov I, Stefanov S, Andonova V. We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists TOP 1 %. INTECH. 2016;i:13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tang Y, Xin H, Yang F, Long X. A historical review and bibliometric analysis of nanoparticles toxicity on algae. J Nanopart Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4196-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Badawi AK, Salama RS, Mostafa MMM. Natural-based coagulants/flocculants as sustainable market-valued products for industrial wastewater treatment: a review of recent developments. RSC Adv. 2023;13:19335–55. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra01999c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang B, Song Z, Sun L. A review: Comparison of multi-air-pollutant removal by advanced oxidation processes—industrial implementation for catalytic oxidation processes. Chem Eng J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Han Y, Wang Y, Li W, Chen X, Xue T, Chen W, Fan Y, Qiu X, Zhu T. Susceptibility of prediabetes to the health effect of air pollution: a community-based panel study with a nested case-control design. Environ Health. 2019;18:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-019-0502-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rashid R, Shafiq I, Akhter P, Iqbal MJ, Hussain M. A state-of-the-art review on wastewater treatment techniques: the effectiveness of adsorption method. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:9050–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12395-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baigorria E, Galhardi JA, Fraceto LF. Trends in polymers networks applied to the removal of aqueous pollutants: a review. J Clean Prod. 2021;295: 126451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Garcia-Segura S, Ocon JD, Chong MN. Electrochemical oxidation remediation of real wastewater effluents—a review. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2018;113:48–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Elgarahy AM, Elwakeel KZ, Akhdhar A, Hamza MF. Recent advances in greenly synthesized nanoengineered materials for water/wastewater remediation: an overview. Nanotechnol Environ Eng. 2021;6:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-021-00104-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Guesmi A, Cherif MM, Baaloudj O, Kenfoud H, Badawi AK, Elfalleh W, Hamadi NB, Khezami L, Assadi AA. Disinfection of corona and myriad viruses in water by non-thermal plasma: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(37):55321–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21160-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Badawi AK, Zaher K. Hybrid treatment system for real textile wastewater remediation based on coagulation/flocculation, adsorption and filtration processes: performance and economic evaluation. J Water Process Eng. 2021;40: 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.101963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jawed A, Saxena V, Pandey LM. Engineered nanomaterials and their surface functionalization for the removal of heavy metals: a review. J Water Process Eng. 2020;33:101009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Suresh R, Rajendran S, Kumar PS, Vo DVN, Cornejo-Ponce L. Recent advancements of spinel ferrite based binary nanocomposite photocatalysts in wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 2021;274: 129734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129734.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Al-Anazi A, Abdelraheem WH, Scheckel K, Nadagouda MN, O’Shea K, Dionysiou DD. Novel franklinite-like synthetic zinc-ferrite redox nanomaterial: synthesis, and evaluation for degradation of diclofenac in water. Appl Catal B. 2020;275: 119098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119098.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang C, Mou W, Li J, Liu Y. Extremely well-dispersed zinc oxide nanofluids with excellent antibacterial, antifungal, and formaldehyde and toluene removal properties. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2022;61:3973–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Asghar N, Nguyen DA, Jang A. Application of MnFe2O4 magnetic silica-covered ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-functionalized nanomaterials to the draw solution in forward osmosis. Chemosphere. 2023;330: 138735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu Y, Liu Y, Chen R, Zhang WH, Ge Q. A pH-responsive supramolecular draw solute that achieves high-performance in arsenic removal via forward osmosis. Water Res. 2019;165: 114993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sheoran K, Kaur H, Siwal SS, Saini AK, Vo DVN, Thakur VK. Recent advances of carbon-based nanomaterials (CBNMs) for wastewater treatment: synthesis and application. Chemosphere. 2022;299: 134364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Akbari A, Amini M, Tarassoli A, Eftekhari-Sis B, Ghasemian N, Jabbari E. Transition metal oxide nanoparticles as efficient catalysts in oxidation reactions. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects. 2018;14:19–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2018.01.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Santhosh C, Velmurugan V, Jacob G, Jeong SK, Grace AN, Bhatnagar A. Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications: a review. Chem Eng J. 2016;306:1116–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hojjati-Najafabadi A, Mansoorianfar M, Liang T, Shahin K, Wen Y, Bahrami A, Karaman C, Zare N, Karimi-Maleh H, Vasseghian Y. Magnetic-MXene-based nanocomposites for water and wastewater treatment: a review. J Water Process Eng. 2022;47: 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cervantes-Avilés P, Keller AA. Incidence of metal-based nanoparticles in the conventional wastewater treatment process. Water Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kane A, Assadi AA, El Jery A, Badawi AK, Kenfoud H, Baaloudj O, Assadi AA. Advanced photocatalytic treatment of wastewater using immobilized titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst in a pilot-scale reactor: process intensification. Materials. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134547.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hussain F, Roy S, Narasimhan K, Vengadassalam K, Lu H. E-glass-polypropylene pultruded nanocomposite: manufacture, characterization, thermal and mechanical properties. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2007;20:411–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705707079604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Guo F, Aryana S, Han Y, Jiao Y. A review of the synthesis and applications of polymer-nanoclay composites. Appl Sci (Switzerland). 2018;8:1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091696.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu J, Zeng X, Wu S, Wang L, Liu G. Preparation and properties of montmorillonite modified asphalts. Mater Sci Eng, A. 2007;447:233–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. You Z, Mills-Beale J, Foley JM, Roy S, Odegard GM, Dai Q, Goh SW. Nanoclay-modified asphalt materials: preparation and characterization. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(2):1072–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. You Z, Mills-Beale J, Foley JM, Roy S, Odegard GM, Dai Q, Goh SW. Nanoclay-modified asphalt materials: preparation and characterization. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25:1072–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chan ML, Lau KT, Wong TT, Ho MP, Hui D. Mechanism of reinforcement in a nanoclay/polymer composite. Compos B Eng. 2011;42:1708–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.03.011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rong K, Wang J, Zhang Z, Zhang J. Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles using Korla fragrant pear peel extracts for the removal of aqueous Cr(VI). Ecol Eng. 2020;149: 105793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Soni R, Pal AK, Tripathi P, Lal JA, Kesari K, Tripathi V. An overview of nanoscale materials on the removal of wastewater contaminants. Appl Water Sci. 2020;10:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01275-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Sarkar B, Mandal S, Tsang YF, Kumar P, Kim KH, Ok YS. Designer carbon nanotubes for contaminant removal in water and wastewater: a critical review. Sci Total Environ. 2018;612:561–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.132.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yu G, Wang X, Liu J, Jiang P, You S, Ding N, Guo Q, Lin F. Applications of nanomaterials for heavy metal removal from water and soil: a review. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13020713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Pumera M. Graphene-based nanomaterials and their electrochemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:4146–57. https://doi.org/10.1039/C002690P.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Perreault F, Fonseca De Faria A, Elimelech M. Environmental applications of graphene-based nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:5861–96. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00021A.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jung W, Lee JS, Han S, Ko SH, Kim T, Kim YH. An efficient reduced graphene-oxide filter for PM2.5 removal. J Mater Chem A Mater. 2018;6:16975–82. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta04587a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Shahzad W, Badawi AK, Rehan ZA, Khan AM, Khan RA, Shah F, Ali S, Ismail B. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance of Sr0.3(Ba, Mn)0.7ZrO3 perovskites anchored on graphene oxide. Ceram Int. 2022;48:24979–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Guo M, Wang J, Wang C, Strong PJ, Jiang P, Ok YS, Wang H. Carbon nanotube-grafted chitosan and its adsorption capacity for phenol in aqueous solution. Sci Total Environ. 2019;682:340–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Manimegalai S, Vickram S, Deena SR, Rohini K, Thanigaivel S, Manikandan S, Subbaiya R, Karmegam N, Kim W, Govarthanan M. Carbon-based nanomaterial intervention and efficient removal of various contaminants from effluents—a review. Chemosphere. 2023;312: 137319. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.137319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Baby R, Saifullah B, Hussein MZ. Carbon nanomaterials for the treatment of heavy metal-contaminated water and environmental remediation. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2019;2019(14):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S11671-019-3167-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Das R, Bandyopadhyay R, Pramanik P. Carbon quantum dots from natural resource: a review. Mater Today Chem. 2018;8:96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCHEM.2018.03.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Tian L, Li Z, Wang P, Zhai X, Wang X, Li T. Carbon quantum dots for advanced electrocatalysis. J Energy Chem. 2021;55:279–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECHEM.2020.06.057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Ying Lim S, Shen W, Gao Z. Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(1):362–81. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00269E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Xu Y, Liu J, Gao C, Wang E. Applications of carbon quantum dots in electrochemiluminescence: a mini review. Electrochem Commun. 2014;48:151–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Shen J, Zhu Y, Yang X, Li C. Graphene quantum dots: emergent nanolights for bioimaging, sensors, catalysis and photovoltaic devices. Chem Commun. 2012;48:3686–99. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CC00110A.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Li L, Wu G, Yang G, Peng J, Zhao J, Zhu JJ. Focusing on luminescent graphene quantum dots: current status and future perspectives. Nanoscale. 2013;5:4015–39. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR33849E.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ding HM, Ma YQ. Computational approaches to cell-nanomaterial interactions: keeping balance between therapeutic efficiency and cytotoxicity. Nanoscale Horiz. 2018;3:6–27. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nh00138j.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Silva S, Almeida AJ, Vale N. Combination of cell-penetrating peptides with nanoparticles for therapeutic application: a review. Biomolecules. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9010022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Singh AP, Biswas A, Shukla A, Maiti P. Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019;4:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-019-0068-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Lin Y, Jin X, Khan NI, Owens G, Chen Z. Bimetallic Fe/Ni nanoparticles derived from green synthesis for the removal of arsenic (V) in mine wastewater. J Environ Manage. 2022;301: 113838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kumari S, Mankotia D, Chauhan GS. Crosslinked cellulose dialdehyde for Congo red removal from its aqueous solutions. J Environ Chem Eng. 2016;4:1126–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Liu Y, Gordeyeva K, Bergström L. Steady-shear and viscoelastic properties of cellulose nanofibril–nanoclay dispersions. Cellulose. 2017;24:1815–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1211-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Kadam A, Saratale RG, Shinde S, Yang J, Hwang K, Mistry B, Saratale GD, Lone S, Kim DY, Sung JS, Ghodake G. Adsorptive remediation of cobalt oxide nanoparticles by magnetized Α-cellulose fibers from waste paper biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2019;273:386–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Upton BM, Kasko AM. Strategies for the conversion of lignin to high-value polymeric materials: review and perspective. Chem Rev. 2016;116:2275–306. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:1552–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Alahmadi NS, Betts JW, Cheng F, Francesconi MG, Kelly SM, Kornherr A, Prior TJ, Wadhawan JD. Synthesis and antibacterial effects of cobalt-cellulose magnetic nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2017;7:20020–6. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA00920H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Miao C, Hamad WY. Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: a critical review. Cellulose. 2013;20:2221–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0007-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Berglund J, Mikkelsen D, Flanagan BM, Dhital S, Gaunitz S, Henriksson G, Lindström ME, Yakubov GE, Gidley MJ, Vilaplana F. Wood hemicelluloses exert distinct biomechanical contributions to cellulose fibrillar networks. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18390-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Martínez-Abad A, Giummarella N, Lawoko M, Vilaplana F. Differences in extractability under subcritical water reveal interconnected hemicellulose and lignin recalcitrance in birch hardwoods. Green Chem. 2018;20:2534–46. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8gc00385h.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Li P, Lv W, Ai S. Green and gentle synthesis of Cu2O nanoparticles using lignin as reducing and capping reagent with antibacterial properties. J Exp Nanosci. 2016;11:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2015.1015462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Ge Y, Li Z. Application of lignin and its derivatives in adsorption of heavy metal ions in water: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6:7181–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Adewuyi A, Pereira FV. Surface modification of cellulose isolated from Sesamun indicum underutilized seed: a means of enhancing cellulose hydrophobicity. J Sci Adv Mater Devices. 2017;2:326–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2017.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Aulenta F, Hayes W, Rannard S. Dendrimers: a new class of nanoscopic containers and delivery devices. Eur Polym J. 2003;39:1741–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00100-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Sherje AP, Jadhav M, Dravyakar BR, Kadam D. Dendrimers: a versatile nanocarrier for drug delivery and targeting. Int J Pharm. 2018;548:707–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.07.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Aigbe UO, Ukhurebor KE, Onyancha RB, Ama OM, Osibote OA, Kusuma HS, Okanigbuan PN, Azi SO, Osifo PO. Dendrimers for environmental remediation. Nanotechnol Environ Remediat. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527834143.ch13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang F, Wang B, He S, Man R. Preparation of graphene-oxide/polyamidoamine dendrimers and their adsorption properties toward some heavy metal ions. J Chem Eng Data. 2014;59:1719–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/je500219e.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Algarra M, Vázquez MI, Alonso B, Casado CM, Casado J, Benavente J. Characterization of an engineered cellulose based membrane by thiol dendrimer for heavy metals removal. Chem Eng J. 2014;253:472–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Madaan K, Kumar S, Poonia N, Lather V, Pandita D. Dendrimers in drug delivery and targeting: drug-dendrimer interactions and toxicity issues. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014;6:139–50. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.130965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Rego RM, Kuriya G, Kurkuri MD, Kigga M. MOF based engineered materials in water remediation: recent trends. J Hazard Mater. 2021;403: 123605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Li X, Zhu QL. MOF-based materials for photo- and electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. EnergyChem. 2020;2: 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Dhaka S, Kumar R, Deep A, Kurade MB, Ji SW, Jeon BH. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for the removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic environments. Coord Chem Rev. 2019;380:330–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2018.10.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Ha J, Moon HR. Synthesis of MOF-on-MOF architectures in the context of interfacial lattice matching. CrystEngComm. 2021;23:2337–54. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ce01883j.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Ahmed I, Jhung SH. Composites of metal-organic frameworks: preparation and application in adsorption. Mater Today. 2014;17:136–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.03.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Fahmy SA, Preis E, Bakowsky U, Azzazy HMES. Platinum nanoparticles: green synthesis and biomedical applications. Molecules. 2020;25:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25214981.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Kumar H, Bhardwaj K, Kuča K, Kalia A, Nepovimova E, Verma R, Kumar D. Flower-based green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles: applications beyond fragrance. Nanomaterials. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10040766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Nguyen DA, Nguyen DV, Jeong G, Asghar N, Jang A. Critical evaluation of hybrid metal-organic framework composites for efficient treatment of arsenic-contaminated solutions by adsorption and membrane-separation process. Chem Eng Jl. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Guan T, Yao M. Use of carbon nanotube filter in removing bioaerosols. J Aerosol Sci. 2010;41:611–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.03.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Anjum M, Miandad R, Waqas M, Gehany F, Barakat MA. Remediation of wastewater using various nano-materials. Arab J Chem. 2019;12:4897–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2016.10.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Lv Y, Liu H, Wang Z, Liu S, Hao L, Sang Y, Liu D, Wang J, Boughton RI. Silver nanoparticle-decorated porous ceramic composite for water treatment. J Memb Sci. 2009;331:50–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. de Freitas Rosa P, Aguiar ML, Bernardo A. Modification of cotton fabrics with silver nanoparticles for use in conditioner air to minimize the bioaerosol concentration in indoor environments. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3429-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Glencross DA, Ho TR, Camiña N, Hawrylowicz CM, Pfeffer PE. Air pollution and its effects on the immune system. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;151:56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.01.179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Ibrahim RK, Hayyan M, AlSaadi MA, Hayyan A, Ibrahim S. Environmental application of nanotechnology: air, soil, and water. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6457-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Nasir AM, Goh PS, Abdullah MS, Ng BC, Ismail AF. Adsorptive nanocomposite membranes for heavy metal remediation: recent progresses and challenges. Chemosphere. 2019;232:96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Tang W, Meng Y, Yang B, He D, Li Y, Li B, Shi Z, Zhao C. Preparation of hollow-fiber nanofiltration membranes of high performance for effective removal of PFOA and high resistance to BSA fouling. J Environ Sci (China). 2022;122:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.10.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Cheng XQ, Zhang YL, Wang ZX, Guo ZH, Bai YP, Shao L. Recent advances in polymeric solvent-resistant nanofiltration membranes. Adv Polym Technol. 2014;33:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21455.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Nayab SS, Abbas MA, Mushtaq S, Niazi BK, Batool M, Shehnaz G, Ahmad N, Ahmad NM. Anti-foulant ultrafiltration polymer composite membranes incorporated with composite activated carbon/chitosan and activated carbon/thiolated chitosan with enhanced hydrophilicity. Membranes (Basel). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11110827.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Wang P, Hu S, Xiang J, Su S, Sun L, Cao F, Xiao X, Zhang A. Analysis of mercury species over CuO-MnO2-Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 catalysts by thermal desorption. Proc Combust Inst. 2015;35:2847–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.054.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Zhang R, Lu K, Zong L, Tong S, Wang X, Zhou J, Lu ZH, Feng G. Control synthesis of CeO2 nanomaterials supported gold for catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide. Mol Catal. 2017;442:173–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.09.024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Shen B, Zhu S, Zhang X, Chi G, Patel D, Si M, Wu C. Simultaneous removal of NO and Hg0 using Fe and Co co-doped Mn-Ce/TiO2 catalysts. Fuel. 2018;224:241–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.080.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Song Z, Wang B, Yu J, Ma C, Chen T, Yang W, Liu S, Sun L. Effect of Ti doping on heterogeneous oxidation of NO over Fe3O4 (1 1 1) surface by H2O2: a density functional study. Chem Eng J. 2018;354:517–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Ali A, Pan M, Tilly TB, Zia M, Wu CY. Performance of silver, zinc, and iron nanoparticles-doped cotton filters against airborne E. coli to minimize bioaerosol exposure. Air Qual Atmos Health. 2018;11:1233–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0622-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Chen L, Xu Z, He C, Wang Y, Liang Z, Zhao Q, Lu Q. Gas-phase total oxidation of nitric oxide using hydrogen peroxide vapor over Pt/TiO 2. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;457:821–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Zhao Y, Ma X, Xu P, Wang H, Liu Y, He A. Elemental mercury removal from flue gas by CoFe2O4 catalyzed peroxymonosulfate. J Hazard Mater. 2018;341:228–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.07.047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Sharif HMA, Cheng HY, Haider MR, Khan K, Yang L, Wang AJ. NO removal with efficient recovery of N 2 O by using recyclable Fe 3 O 4 @EDTA@Fe(II) complex: a novel approach toward resource recovery from flue gas. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53:1004–13. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b03934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Zhao Y, Yuan B, Zheng Z, Hao R. Removal of multi-pollutant from flue gas utilizing ammonium persulfate solution catalyzed by Fe/ZSM-5. J Hazard Mater. 2019;362:266–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Bortolassi ACC, Nagarajan S, de Araújo Lima B, Guerra VG, Aguiar ML, Huon V, Soussan L, Cornu D, Miele P, Bechelany M. Efficient nanoparticles removal and bactericidal action of electrospun nanofibers membranes for air filtration. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;102:718–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.094.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Huy NN, Thanh Thuy VT, Thang NH, Thuy NT, Quynh LT, Khoi TT, Van Thanh D. Facile one-step synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles by ultrasonic-assisted precipitation method and its application for H2S adsorption in air. J Phys Chem Solids. 2019;132:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2019.04.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Faghihi-Zarandi A, Rakhtshah J, BahramiYarahmadi B, Shirkhanloo H. A rapid removal of xylene vapor from environmental air based on bismuth oxide coupled to heterogeneous graphene/graphene oxide by UV photo-catalectic degradation-adsorption procedure. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8: 104193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Zhang X, Shi Q, Shen B, Hu Z, Zhang X. MIL-100(Fe) supported Mn-based catalyst and its behavior in Hg0 removal from flue gas. J Hazard Mater. 2020;381: 121003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Zarandi AF, Shirkhanloo H, Paydar P. A novel method based on functionalized bimodal mesoporous silica nanoparticles for efficient removal of lead aerosols pollution from air by solid-liquid gas-phase extraction 03 Chemical Sciences 0306 Physical Chemistry (incl. Structural). J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2020;18:177–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00450-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Jang S, Jung S, Song S, Lee S, Lee H, Cho E, Lee HJ, Park S, Youn B, Park KH. Preparation and characterization of multifunctional nanofibers containing metal-organic frameworks and Cu2O nanoparticles: particulate matter capture and antibacterial activity. Environ Sci NANO. 2021;8:1226–35. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1en00032b.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Li J, Li B, Sui G, Du L, Zhuang Y, Zhang Y, Zou Y. Removal of volatile organic compounds from air using supported ionic liquid membrane containing ultraviolet-visible light-driven Nd-TiO2 nanoparticles. J Mol Struct. 2021;1231:2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.130023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Inomata Y, Kubota H, Hata S, Kiyonaga E, Morita K, Yoshida K, Sakaguchi N, Toyao T, IchiShimizu K, Ishikawa S, Ueda W, Haruta M, Murayama T. Bulk tungsten-substituted vanadium oxide for low-temperature NOx removal in the presence of water. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20867-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Shirkhanloo H, Faghihi-Zarandi A, Mobarake MD. Thiol modified bimodal mesoporous silica nanoparticles for removal and determination toxic vanadium from air and human biological samples in petrochemical workers. NanoImpact. 2021;23: 100339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Zhang H, Zhang X, Wang P, Chen R, Gu G, Hu S, Tian R. Laminated polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membrane codoped with boehmite nanoparticles for efficient electrostatic capture of particulate matters. Nanotechnology. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abeadc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Bembibre A, Benamara M, Hjiri M, Gómez E, Alamri HR, Dhahri R, Serrà A. Visible-light driven sonophotocatalytic removal of tetracycline using Ca-doped ZnO nanoparticles. Chem Eng J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Hernández-Fontes C, Pfeiffer H. Unraveling the CO and CO2 reactivity on Li2MnO3: sorption and catalytic analyses. Chem Eng J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Qu Y, Zheng X, Ma K, He W, Wang S, Zhang P. Facile coating of MnO2 nanoparticles onto polymer fibers via friction-heating adhesion for efficient formaldehyde removal. Chem Eng J. 2022;430: 132954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132954.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Zhou Y, He Y, Xiang Y, Meng S, Liu X, Yu J, Yang J, Zhang J, Qin P, Luo L. Single and simultaneous adsorption of pefloxacin and Cu(II) ions from aqueous solutions by oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube. Sci Total Environ. 2019;646:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Xia K, Guo Y, Shao Q, Zan Q, Bai R. Removal of Mercury (II) by EDTA-functionalized magnetic CoFe 2 O 4 @SiO 2 nanomaterial with core-shell structure. Nanomaterials. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111532.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Dai S, Wang N, Qi C, Wang X, Ma Y, Yang L, Liu X, Huang Q, Nie C, Hu B, Wang X. Preparation of core-shell structure Fe3O4@C@MnO2 nanoparticles for efficient elimination of U(VI) and Eu(III) ions. Sci Total Environ. 2019;685:986–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Yang C, Zhang J, Zhu X, Liu Y, Chen Y, Wang C. Deep and efficient removal of vanadium from molybdate solution using magnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;529: 147060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147060.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Feng G, Ma J, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Xiao Y, Ma Q, Wang S. Magnetic natural composite Fe3O4-chitosan@bentonite for removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;538:132–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.087.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Wang W, Wu G, Zhu T, Yang Y, Zhang Y. Synthesis of -thiazole Schiff base modified SBA-15 mesoporous silica for selective Pb(II) adsorption. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2021;125:349–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.06.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Reghioua A, Barkat D, Jawad AH, Abdulhameed AS, Rangabhashiyam S, Khan MR, Alothman ZA. Magnetic chitosan-glutaraldehyde/zinc oxide/Fe3O4 nanocomposite: optimization and adsorptive mechanism of remazol brilliant blue R dye removal. J Polym Environ. 2021;29:3932–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02160-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. BoHuo J, Yu G, Wang J. Magnetic zeolitic imidazolate frameworks composite as an efficient adsorbent for arsenic removal from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater. 2021;412: 125298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Zhang J, Feng L, Jian Y, Luo G, Wang M, Hu B, Liu T, Li J, Yuan Y, Wang N. Interlayer spacing adjusted zirconium phosphate with 2D ion channels for highly efficient removal of uranium contamination in radioactive effluent. Chem Eng J. 2022;429: 132265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Mahmoud ME, Saad SR, El-Ghanam AM, Mohamed RHA. Developed magnetic Fe3O4–MoO3-AC nanocomposite for effective removal of ciprofloxacin from water. Mater Chem Phys. 2021;257: 123454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Guo T, Lei Y, Hu X, Yang G, Liang J, Huang Q, Li X, Liu M, Zhang X, Wei Y. Hydrothermal synthesis of MXene-MoS2 composites for highly efficient removal of pesticides. Appl Surf Sci. 2022;588: 152597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.152597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Sharma R, Zhou Z, Themelis T, Van Assche TRC, Eeltink S, Denayer JFM. Removal of low trace ppb-level perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) with ZIF-8 coatings involving adsorbent degradation. Langmuir. 2023;39:3341–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Chang PH, Mukhopadhyay R, Zhong B, Yang QY, Zhou S, Tzou YM, Sarkar B. Synthesis and characterization of PCN-222 metal organic framework and its application for removing perfluorooctane sulfonate from water. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;636:459–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.01.032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Njaramba LK, Kim M, Yea Y, Yoon Y, Park CM. Efficient adsorption of naproxen and ibuprofen by gelatin/zirconium-based metal–organic framework/sepiolite aerogels via synergistic mechanisms. Chem Eng J. 2023;452: 139426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Arya S, Mahajan P, Mahajan S, Khosla A, Datt R, Gupta V, Young S-J, Oruganti SK. Review—influence of processing parameters to control morphology and optical properties of sol-gel synthesized ZnO nanoparticles. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol. 2021;10: 023002. https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/abe095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Zahmatkesh S, Hajiaghaei-Keshteli M, Bokhari A, Sundaramurthy S, Panneerselvam B, Rezakhani Y. Wastewater treatment with nanomaterials for the future: a state-of-the-art review. Environ Res. 2023;216: 114652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Mater Y, Kamel M, Karam A, Bakhoum E. ANN-Python prediction model for the compressive strength of green concrete. Constr Innov. 2023;23:340–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-08-2021-0145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Olajire AA, Bamigbade LA. Green synthesis of chitosan-based iron@silver nanocomposite as adsorbent for wastewater treatment. Water Resour Ind. 2021;26: 100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2021.100158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Zarrabi A, Ghasemi-Fasaei R. Preparation of green synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles for efficient removal of lead from wastewaters. Int J Phytoremediat. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2021.1984385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Xu Q, Li W, Ma L, Cao D, Owens G, Chen Z. Simultaneous removal of ammonia and phosphate using green synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles dispersed onto zeolite. Sci Total Environ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Singh P, Kim YJ, Zhang D, Yang DC. Biological synthesis of nanoparticles from plants and microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:588–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Jeyaraj M, Gurunathan S, Qasim M, Kang MH, Kim JH. A comprehensive review on the synthesis, characterization, and biomedical application of platinum nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9121719.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Abdullah FH, Abu Bakar NHH, Abu Bakar M. Comparative study of chemically synthesized and low temperature bio-inspired Musa acuminata peel extract mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles for enhanced visible-photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants in wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater. 2021;406: 124779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Ali I, Afshinb S, Poureshgh Y, Azari A, Rashtbari Y, Feizizadeh A, Hamzezadeh A, Fazlzadeh M. Green preparation of activated carbon from pomegranate peel coated with zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) and isotherm and kinetic studies of amoxicillin removal in water. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:36732–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09310-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Oruganti RK, Pal D, Panda TK, Shee D, Bhattacharyya D. Green synthesis of calcium oxide nanoparticles impregnated activated carbon from algal–bacterial activated sludge: its application in ciprofloxacin removal. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04662-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Hadi S, Taheri E, Amin MM, Fatehizadeh A. Fabrication of activated carbon from pomegranate husk by dual consecutive chemical activation for 4-chlorophenol adsorption. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:13919–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Amirsadat K, Sharififard H. Adsorption of nitrate from municipal wastewater by synthesized chitosan / iron / activated carbon of orange peel composite. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-03198-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Getahun Y, Gardea-Torresdey J, Manciu FS, Li X, El-Gendy AA. Green synthesized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for water treatment with alternative recyclability. J Mol Liq. 2022;356: 118983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Galan CR, Silva MF, Mantovani D, Bergamasco R, Vieira MF. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles impregnated on activated carbon using Moringa oleifera leaves extract for the removal of nitrates from water. Can J Chem Eng. 2018;96:2378–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.23185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Goutam SP, Saxena G, Singh V, Yadav AK, Bharagava RN, Thapa KB. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using leaf extract of Jatropha curcas L. for photocatalytic degradation of tannery wastewater. Chem Eng J. 2018;336:386–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Sadiq H, Sher F, Sehar S, Lima EC, Zhang S, Iqbal HMN, Zafar F, Nuhanović M. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles from Syzygium Cumini leaves extract with robust photocatalysis applications. J Mol Liq. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Al-Qahtani KM. Cadmium removal from aqueous solution by green synthesis zero valent silver nanoparticles with Benjamina leaves extract. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2017;43:269–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2017.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Gindaba GT, Demsash HD, Jayakumar M. Green synthesis, characterization, and application of metal oxide nanoparticles for mercury removal from aqueous solution. Environ Monit Assess. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10586-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Singh S, Naik TSSK, Thamaraiselvan C, Behera SK, Pavithra N, Bidisha Nath P, Dwivedi P, Singh J, Ramamurthy PC. Applicability of new sustainable and efficient green metal-based nanoparticles for removal of Cr(VI): adsorption anti-microbial, and DFT studies. Environ Pollut. 2023;320:121105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Mukherjee D, Ghosh S, Majumdar S, Annapurna K. Green synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for arsenic(V) remediation with a novel aspect for sludge management. J Environ Chem Eng. 2016;4:639–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  166. Dihingia H, Tiwari D. Green and facile synthesis of heterojunction nanocatalyst: insights and mechanism of antibiotics removal. Sep Purif Technol. 2023;306: 122641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122641.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Iqbal A, Haq AU, Cerrón-Calle GA, Naqvi SAR, Westerhoff P, Garcia-Segura S. Green synthesis of flower-shaped copper oxide and nickel oxide nanoparticles via capparis decidua leaf extract for synergic adsorption-photocatalytic degradation of pesticides. Catalysts. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11070806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Militao IM, Roddick F, Fan L, Zepeda LC, Parthasarathy R, Bergamasco R. PFAS removal from water by adsorption with alginate-encapsulated plant albumin and rice straw-derived biochar. J Water Process Eng. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Ali I, Al-Othman ZA, Alwarthan A. Green synthesis of functionalized iron nano particles and molecular liquid phase adsorption of ametryn from water. J Mol Liq. 2016;221:1168–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.089.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Marimuthu S, Antonisamy AJ, Malayandi S, Rajendran K, Tsai P-C, Pugazhendhi A, KumarPonnusamy V, City CM, Nam V. Silver nanoparticles in dye effluent treatment: a review on synthesis, treatment methods, mechanisms, photocatalytic degradation, toxic effects and mitigation of toxicity. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Maleki A, Hayati B, Najafi F, Gharibi F, Joo SW. Heavy metal adsorption from industrial wastewater by PAMAM/TiO 2 nanohybrid: preparation, characterization and adsorption studies. J Mol Liquids. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.09.060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Qiu H, Lv L, Pan BC, Zhang QJ, Zhang WM, Zhang QX. Critical review in adsorption kinetic models. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A. 2009;10:716–24. https://doi.org/10.1631/JZUS.A0820524/METRICS.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Qu X, Alvarez PJJ, Li Q. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2013;47:3931–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Nassar NN. The application of nanoparticles for wastewater remediation. In: Van der Bruggen B, editor. Applications of nanomaterials for water quality. London: Future Science Ltd; 2013. p. 52–65. https://doi.org/10.4155/ebo.13.373.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  175. Anh Nguyen D, Viet Nguyen D, Jeong G, Asghar N, Jang A. Critical evaluation of hybrid metal–organic framework composites for efficient treatment of arsenic–contaminated solutions by adsorption and membrane–separation process. Chem Eng J. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Kaur S, Sundarrajan S, Rana D, Sridhar R, Gopal R, Matsuura T, Ramakrishna S. Review: the characterization of electrospun nanofibrous liquid filtration membranes. J Mater Sci. 2014;49:6143–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-014-8308-Y/FIGURES/20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  177. Athanasekou CP, Romanos GE, Katsaros FK, Kordatos K, Likodimos V, Falaras P. Very efficient composite titania membranes in hybrid ultrafiltration/photocatalysis water treatment processes. J Memb Sci. 2012;392–393:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2011.12.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Athanasekou CP, Moustakas NG, Morales-Torres S, Pastrana-Martínez LM, Figueiredo JL, Faria JL, Silva AMT, Dona-Rodriguez JM, Romanos GE, Falaras P. Ceramic photocatalytic membranes for water filtration under UV and visible light. Appl Catal B. 2015;178:12–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATB.2014.11.021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. Zhang X, Du AJ, Lee P, Sun DD, Leckie JO. TiO2 nanowire membrane for concurrent filtration and photocatalytic oxidation of humic acid in water. J Memb Sci. 2008;313:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2007.12.045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  180. Athanasekou CP, Romanos GE, Katsaros FK, Kordatos K, Likodimos V, Falaras P. Very efficient composite titania membranes in hybrid ultrafiltration/photocatalysis water treatment processes. J Memb Sci. 2012;392:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. Ma N, Zhang Y, Quan X, Fan X, Zhao H. Performing a microfiltration integrated with photocatalysis using an Ag-TiO2/HAP/Al2O3 composite membrane for water treatment: evaluating effectiveness for humic acid removal and anti-fouling properties. Water Res. 2010;44(20):6104–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  182. Yu H, Guo J, Zhu S, Li Y, Zhang Q, Zhu M. Preparation of continuous alumina nanofibers via electrospinning of PAN/DMF solution. Mater Lett. 2012;74:247–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATLET.2012.01.077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. Nasreen SAAN, Sundarrajan S, Nizar SAS, Balamurugan R, Ramakrishna S. Advancement in electrospun nanofibrous membranes modification and their application in water treatment. Membranes. 2013;3:266–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEMBRANES3040266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. Pichel N, Vivar M, Fuentes M. The problem of drinking water access: a review of disinfection technologies with an emphasis on solar treatment methods. Chemosphere. 2018;218:1014–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. Das SK, Motiar M, Khan R, Parandhaman T, Laffir F, Guha AK, Sekaran G, Mandal AB. Nano-silica fabricated with silver nanoparticles: antifouling adsorbent for efficient dye removal, effective water disinfection and biofouling control. Nanoscale. 2013;5(12):5549. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00856h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. Hamdan M, Darabee S. Enhancement of solar water disinfection using nanotechnology. Int J Thermal Environ Eng. 2017;15:111–6. https://doi.org/10.5383/ijtee.15.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  187. Yunus IS, Harwin A, Kurniawan D, Adityawarman AI. Nanotechnologies in water and air pollution treatment. Environ Technol Rev. 2012;1:136–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2012.733966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. KumarBhardwaj A, Sundaram S, Yadav KK, Srivastav AL. An overview of silver nano-particles as promising materials for water disinfection. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;23: 101721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101721.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. Asuncion Dimapilis ES, Hsu C-S, Marie Mendoza RO, Lu M-C. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for water disinfection. Sustain Environ Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2017.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Qi H. Synergistic degradation of organic pollutants on CoFe2O4/rGO nanocomposites by peroxymonosulfate activation under LED irradiation. Appl Surf Sci. 2022;579: 152151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. Baaloudj O, Badawi AK, Kenfoud H, Benrighi Y, Hassan R, Nasrallah N, Assadi AA. Techno-economic studies for a pilot-scale Bi12TiO20 based photocatalytic system for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment: from laboratory studies to commercial-scale applications. J Water Process Eng. 2022;48: 102847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Peng C, Yu D, Wang L, Yu X, Zhao Z. Recent advances in the preparation and catalytic performance of Mn-based oxide catalysts with special morphologies for the removal of air pollutants. J Mater Chem A Mater. 2021;9:12947–80. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta00911g.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Saleh TS, Badawi AK, Salama RS, Mostafa MMM. Design and development of novel composites containing nickel ferrites supported on activated carbon derived from agricultural wastes and its application in water remediation. Materials. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. Baaloudj O, Nasrallah N, Kenfoud H, Bourkeb KW, Badawi AK. Polyaniline/Bi12TiO20 hybrid system for cefixime removal by combining adsorption and photocatalytic degradation. ChemEngineering. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering7010004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. Mahmoudi F, Saravanakumar K, Maheskumar V, KamandeNjaramba L, Yoon Y, Park CM, Park CM. Application of perovskite oxides and their composites for degrading organic pollutants from wastewater using advanced oxidation processes: review of the recent progress. J Hazard Mater. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  196. Neumann S, Gutmann T, Buntkowsky G, Paul S, Thiele G, Sievers H, Bäumer M, Kunz S. Insights into the reaction mechanism and particle size effects of CO oxidation over supported Pt nanoparticle catalysts. J Catal. 2019;377:662–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCAT.2019.07.049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  197. Li L, Yang A, He X, Liu J, Ma Y, Niu J, Luo B. Indoor air pollution from solid fuels and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2020;259: 113914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  198. Jabbar ZH, Ebrahim SE. Recent advances in nano-semiconductors photocatalysis for degrading organic contaminants and microbial disinfection in wastewater: a comprehensive review. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag. 2022;17: 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  199. Rezaee A, Rangkooy H, Khavanin A, Jafari AJ. High photocatalytic decomposition of the air pollutant formaldehyde using nano-ZnO on bone char. Environ Chem Lett. 2014;12:353–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-014-0453-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. Park JH, Yoon KY, Kim YS, Byeon JH, Hwang J. Removal of submicron aerosol particles and bioaerosols using carbon fiber ionizer assisted fibrous medium filter media. J Mech Sci Technol. 2009;23:1846–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0613-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would also like to acknowledge the contributions and support of individuals and institutions who have played a significant role in making this review article possible.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NA played a central role in conceptualizing the research, conducting the systematic review and bibliometric analysis, synthesizing the findings, and drafting the initial manuscript. She also actively contributed to data analysis and interpretation. AH made substantial contributions to the literature review, data collection, and analysis of research articles. He also provided critical insights into the methodology and research design. DAN contributed to the synthesis of the review by providing expertise in nanomaterials and their applications in environmental pollutant remediation. He reviewed and edited sections related to nanomaterial synthesis pathways. SA assisted in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, particularly in the context of environmental pollutant remediation techniques. He also contributed to the revision of the manuscript based on reviewer feedback. IH played a key role in data analysis, statistical evaluation, and visualization of bibliometric data. He also contributed to the development of figures and tables. AJ provided valuable insights into the overall structure and organization of the manuscript. He played a crucial role in ensuring the clarity and coherence of the review. AA supervised the entire research process, provided guidance on manuscript preparation, coordinated author contributions, and ensured adherence to journal guidelines and ethical standards. He also contributed to the critical review of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nosheen Asghar or Attarad Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The review article involving bibliometric analysis and the synthesis of nanomaterials for environmental pollutant remediation adheres to the highest ethical standards. All participants, including authors and contributors, involved in this review paper have provided informed and voluntary consent to participate. A signed consent page was obtained from each individual, clearly outlining their willingness to contribute to this study.

Consent for publication

The authors grant permission for the publication of this article in its revised form.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asghar, N., Hussain, A., Nguyen, D.A. et al. Advancement in nanomaterials for environmental pollutants remediation: a systematic review on bibliometrics analysis, material types, synthesis pathways, and related mechanisms. J Nanobiotechnol 22, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02151-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02151-3

Keywords