- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
Microbial hydrogen “manufactory” for enhanced gas therapy and self-activated immunotherapy via reduced immune escape
Journal of Nanobiotechnology volume 20, Article number: 280 (2022)
Abstract
Background
As an antioxidant, hydrogen (H2) can selectively react with the highly toxic hydroxyl radical (·OH) in tumor cells to break the balance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cause oxidative stress. However, due to the high diffusibility and storage difficulty of hydrogen, it is impossible to achieve long-term release at the tumor site, which highly limited their therapeutic effect.
Results
Photosynthetic bacteria (PSB) release a large amount of hydrogen to break the balance of oxidative stress. In addition, as a nontoxic bacterium, PSB could stimulate the immune response and increase the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. More interestingly, we found that hydrogen therapy induced by our live PSB did not lead to the up-regulation of PD-L1 after stimulating the immune response, which could avoid the tumor immune escape.
Conclusion
Hydrogen-immunotherapy significantly kills tumor cells. We believe that our live microbial hydrogen production system provides a new strategy for cancer hydrogen treatment combining with enhanced immunotherapy without up-regulating PD-L1.
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
As the lightest gas in nature, the biological effects of H2 have attracted widespread attention. As early as 1975, Dole et al. found that H2 could inhibit tumor growth in mice with squamous cell carcinoma [1]. H2 possesses the properties of biological reduction and has been found to have a good therapeutic effect in some oxidative stress and inflammatory diseases [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. ROS in tumor cells were in a high balance state. H2 can react with highly toxic free radicals in ROS such as ·OH [12], which disrupted the steady-state balance of ROS in cancer cells and caused redox stress [13, 14]. In addition, different from chemical drugs, H2 is safe and non-toxic [15, 16]. Therefore, hydrogen therapy has attracted more and more attention in recent years. He et al. synthesized a series of metal palladium compounds to store and produce hydrogen for tumor H2 therapy [17,18,19]. In addition, other strategies that using tumor acidic microenvironment such as Mg, Fe nanoparticle as reductant for hydrogen production have also been fabricated [20, 21]. However, these strategies were limited by the non-biocompatible materials, and it was difficult to achieve long-term release of H2. Therefore, developing a new long-term hydrogen-production strategy plays a key role in improving the effect of hydrogen therapy.
Recently, the use of bacteria and other microorganisms as living carriers and therapeutic drugs for disease treatment has received widespread attention [22,23,24]. For example, S. typhimurium [25,26,27] and Clostridium [28, 29] have been widely used in tumor therapy. However, the mentioned bacteria are usually toxic and need complicated detoxication procedure. In addition, transgenic technology should be used to construct anti-tumor agents releasing engineered bacteria [30, 31]. PSB is a facultative anaerobic bacterium that could multiply in light and hypoxic environments [32, 33]. Our previous work has utilized nontoxic PSB as a hypoxia-targeting photothermal agent for tumor therapy [34]. More interestingly, we have found H2 was released as a product during photosynthesis of PSB [35, 36]. Chlorophyll and carotenoids of PSB captured photon and transmitted them to photosynthetic system upon light irradiation. Hydrogen was produced by the action of hydrogenase and nitrogenase [37]. Furthermore, our previous work has demonstrated PSB as a natural bacterium can increase the infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes to stimulate the immune response [34]. Thus, we believe PSB is a good hydrogen "storage container" for in situ and long-term H2 production in tumor hypoxia with the capacity of hypoxia and light-chemotaxis.
Inspired by this, in this work, PSB with long-term hydrogen releasing capability was developed for cancer treatment. PSB autonomously targeted to the hypoxic area and continuously released hydrogen under the irradiation of xenon lamp. H2 diffused into cells and caused oxidative stress to kill tumor cells. Antigens were released by apoptotic cells to activate dendritic cells (DCs) and stimulate immune response. More interestingly, as chemotherapy always induce the up-regulation of PD-L1 and induce immune escape [38,39,40,41], we found that PSB-based therapy did not induce the increased expression of PD-L1, which would enhance tumor immunotherapy (Fig. 1). Thus, the combination of hydrogen therapy with self-activated immunotherapy provided a new strategy for cancer treatment.
Results
Characterization of PSB
The morphology of the bacterium was first characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Fig. 2A). It was found that PSB was ovoid in shape with a size of about 2 μm. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) results affirmed that PSB had flagella, which supported their motility (Fig. 2B). Gram staining showed that PSB was a gram-negative bacterium (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). As shown in the UV–Vis absorption spectrum (Fig. 2C), PSB had absorption peaks at 375 nm and 590 nm, confirming the presence of carotenoids in PSB. In addition, we found strong absorption peaks at 804 nm and 870 nm, which were characteristic absorption peaks of bacterial chlorophyll. Chlorophyll and carotenoids acted as a photon capture platform, photons were absorbed by chlorophyll and carotenoids and energy was transferred to the photosynthetic reaction center, thereby generated a high-energy electron. High-energy electrons generated ATP by cyclic phosphorylation. Nitrase and hydrogenase consumed the ATP and electrons to reduce protons to hydrogen. The hydrogen production process of PSB was completed. Then, we verified the hydrogen production performance of PSB in vitro. H2 was reducible and could reduce the methylene blue solution into colorless methyl blue. The absorption peak at 664 nm was measured using UV–Vis spectrum. The concentration of H2 production was calculated according to MB's standard curve line (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The absorption peak showed that the amount of hydrogen production increased with the increase of PSB concentration (Fig. 2D, Additional file 1: Fig. S3) and light intensity (Fig. 2E, Additional file 1: Fig. S4). Glucose was very easy to be used by PSB. It can be used as a carbon source for PSB growth and as a hydrogen production substrate for PSB. Different glucose concentrations affected the H2 production of PSB. Our results indicated that hydrogen production by PSB gave a concentration-dependent behavior (Fig. 2F, Additional file 1: Fig. S5). In addition, when alternating radiation was given, it was found that H2 can continue production after radiation re-giving. This demonstrated the persistence of H2 production by PSB. Furthermore, we found that a small amount of H2 was still produced when switching was “OFF”. That probably because H2 production of PSB was a biological process that took some time to completely stop the process (Fig. 2G). Later, the production of H2 was shown by monitoring the color change of solution at different times. As shown in Fig. 2H, the blue color gradually grew lighter indicating the hydrogen production. Then we studied the effect of different light sources on hydrogen production using 808 laser (1 W), LED red light and xenon light (14 A) (Additional file 1: Fig. S6). Our results showed that PSB had stronger hydrogen release behavior exposure to xenon lamp comparing with other light source. Furthermore, since we have proved the PSB had a photothermal effect for cancer therapy, we studied the temperature change under the same irradiation intensity of H2 production. Our studies showed that the PSB induced a slight photothermal effect under xenon lamps (Additional file 1: Fig. S7) because of the low irradiation intensity. Our results indicated that H2 therapy may play an important role on cancer killing under low irradiation intensity.
Characterization of PSB. A SEM image of PSB. B TEM image of PSB. Scale bar is 1 μm. C UV−Vis−NIR absorption spectra of PSB. D H2 released at different concentrations. E H2 releasing behavior produced by PSB (107 CFU/mL) under various power intensities (12, 13 and 14 A) and F various glucose concentration (0, 15 and 30 g/L). G H2 production of PSB by irradiation with power “On” or “Off” alternately. H The pictures of H2 production in different times of radiation
Hydrogen therapy effect of PSB
In order to prove the production of H2 and diffusion into cells, MCF-7 cells were stained with methylene blue solution and gave different treatments (Con, Con + Light, PSB, PSB + Light). As shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S8, under PSB + Light (L) treatment, the blue color was faded, which confirmed that H2 released by PSB and could diffuse into cells. Blue color in the other three groups had not faded. Later, MTT results showed that different concentrations of PSB had no obvious effect on cell viability, indicating their biosafety (Additional file 1: Fig. S9A). Next, live-dead cell staining analysis was used to verify the killing efficiency of hydrogen from PSB. After receiving different treatments, MCF-7 cells and MCTSs were co-stained by calcein acetoxymethyl ester and propidium iodide (Calcein AM and PI) (Fig. 3A, Additional file 1: Fig. S10). It was observed from confocal fluorescence microscope that the PSB + L group showed strong red fluorescence, while the other three groups showed green fluorescence with slight red fluorescence. It was proved that all the cells in the PSB + L group were killed and almost all the cells in the other three groups still survived. MTT results was consistent with the Live-Dead staining results indicating that H2 had a good killing effect on tumor cells (Additional file 1: Fig. S9B).
H2 induced apoptosis through mitochondria-dependent pathways. A Calcein AM and PI staining showed confocal fluorescence images of MCF-7 cells with or without xenon lamp irradiation for 10 min. (green: living cells; red: dead cells). Scale bar, 400 μm. B ROS changed in MCF-7 cells after hydrogen treatment. Scale bar, 100 μm. C Fluorescence quantification of ROS. D Detection of MMP changed with JC-1 staining after treatment with H2 for 6 h. Scale bar, 100 μm. E ATP activity and F Caspase-3 released in MCF-7 cells after treatment with H2. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. (n = 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
H2 induced cells apoptosis by destroying mitochondrial function
Next, we studied the killing mechanism induced by H2. First, flow cytometry was used to determine the apoptosis of cells after hydrogen treatment (Additional file 1: Fig. S11). It was found that the PSB + L group induced 33.81% of cells apoptosis. The other three groups had no killing effect, indicating that H2 could cause cancer cells apoptosis. Tumor microenvironment contained high levels of ROS, which included a large number of highly toxic hydroxyl free radicals with a steady equilibrium. H2 can react with ·OH to destroy the redox balance of tumor cells by reducing the level of ROS, and then causing oxidative stress. The oxidative stress greatly increased the level of ROS. DCFH-DA fluorescence probe was used to detect the level of intracellular ROS (Fig. 3B). The fluorescence intensity in MCF-7 cells had a downward trend within 3 h, and then increased significantly. Fluorescence quantification was consistent with the previously speculated redox stress process in tumor cells (Fig. 3C). We verified the ·OH level in MCF-7 cells and found that the ·OH level was indeed up-regulated after hydrogen treatment, and the ·OH level was increase after a period of time, indicating that H2 caused the oxidative stress of tumor cells and increase ·OH (Additional file 1: Fig. S12). Elevated ROS levels resulted in the change of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (MMP) (Fig. 3D) and reduction of ATP (Fig. 3E). The change of MMP promoted the release of caspase-3 (Fig. 3F), which indicated that cells apoptosis was caused by the destruction of mitochondrial function by H2. Then we examined the mechanism of H2 therapy on B16-F10 cells. In consistent with H2 therapeutic effect in MCF-7 cells, we found H2 caused oxidative stress by disrupting ROS levels, which disrupted mitochondrial function and resulted in cells apoptosis in B16-F10 cells. In addition, the expression of ATP was down-regulated and the expression of apoptotic protein was up-regulated (Additional file 1: Fig. S13).
Evaluation of in vivo hydrogen therapeutic efficacy
Fluorescence imaging was performed on mice to evaluate the biological safety of PSB (Additional file 1: Fig. S14). PSB were labeled with NHS-Rhodamine B (RhB) and injected to mice. It could be seen that the PSB was retained in the tumor site and did not spread to other organs. In addition, we verified the vivo metabolism of PSB. The results showed that no fluorescence of PSB was observed on the seventh day. This supported the PSB injection cycle (Additional file 1: Fig. S15). The blood biochemistry and blood routine were tested and confirmed PSB was non-toxic (Additional file 1: Fig. S16). 30-day body weight of mice monitoring also indicated their biological safety (Additional file 1: Fig. S17). After having demonstrated their safety, the therapeutic effect of H2 in vivo was then studied. The MCF-7 tumor-bearing mouse model was constructed (Fig. 4A). Tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into PBS, PBS + L, PSB, PSB + L. Samples were injected every 7 days and the light was given every 2 days with sustaining treatment for 21 days. Tumor images (Fig. 4B) and their weights (Fig. 4C) were recorded. Body weight of mice increased steadily within 21 days. The tumor volume was recorded every 2 days. As shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S18 and Fig. 4D, the PSB + L group could significantly inhibit tumor growth. Compared with the PBS group, the tumor of the PSB group was slightly reduced. That probably because PSB would stimulate the immune response and in turn suppresses tumor growth. After 21 days, the mice were euthanized and the tumor tissues and major organs were collected for H&E staining and other histological analysis. As shown in Fig. 4E, the PSB group showed slightly damaged to tumor cells. There was more tumor cells necrosis in the PSB + L group, and little tumor cells damage in the other two groups. H&E staining was performed on the major organs (Additional file 1: Fig. S19), and it was found that the treatment of four groups did not cause damage to the major organs. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling staining (TUNEL) results also shown that PSB + L caused more severe cancer cells apoptosis (Fig. 4F). Our results illustrated that H2 therapy had a good therapeutic effect on the inhibition of cancer cell growth. By measuring the contents of Caspase-3 and Cytochrome C (Cytc) in the tumor tissues (Additional file 1: Fig. S20), we found the damaged contents of the PSB + L group was significantly higher than that of PBS group. The results were consistent with the conclusion of previous experiments and indicated that hydrogen therapy could cause apoptosis by up-regulating apoptotic proteins such as Caspase-3.
In vivo antitumor study. A Schematic diagram of MCF-7 tumor model. B Images of MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice in different treatment groups. C Body weight (n = 6) and D Tumor volume of each mouse in each group (n = 6). E Amplifying H&E and TUNEL staining assay of the tumor from the mice in all groups after treatment for 21 days. F Bar graph of quantitation of TUNEL positive cells. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. (n ≥ 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Hydrogen therapy increased immune cell infiltration
Firstly, we demonstrated in vitro that hydrogen therapy could promote an immune response. As shown in Fig. 5A and Additional file 1: Fig. S21, the expression of CD86 and MHC II proteins on DC was up-regulated. It indicated that hydrogen therapy could cause antigen released and promote the maturation of DC, thus enhancing the immune response. Then the B16-F10 mouse model was used to verify the immunotherapy effect of hydrogen (Fig. 5B). We recorded the images of the mice, survival curve, tumor volume, and mouse body weight over 21 days (Additional file 1: Fig. S22). After 21 days treatment, various cytokines in the blood of mice were tested (Fig. 5C). The results showed that the levels of cytokines such as TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β and IL-6 were significantly up-regulated, indicating PSB promoted immunity by releasing cytokines. The cytokines level of the PSB + L group was slightly lower than the PSB group. It was mainly attributed that H2 had anti-inflammatory properties and could down-regulate the expression of certain anti-inflammatory cytokines. Then the mice tumor tissues were taken to analyze the expression levels of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry (Fig. 5D). Compared with the PBS group, the PSB group had more immune cell infiltration, indicating that PSB could indeed stimulate immunity. The immune cell infiltration level of the PSB + L group also increased compared with the PSB group, which was attributed to the release of antigen induced by H2 therapy. In addition, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence of tumor tissues were examined. As shown in Fig. 5E and F, CD4+, CD8+ and CD161 expression were increased. Results illustrated that the infiltration of CD4+, CD8+ T cells and NK cells was promoted after PSB-mediated hydrogen treatment in tumor tissue. However, the decreasing of Foxp3 expression indicated reduced Treg cells. In addition, gram staining of tumor tissue demonstrated the presence of PSB (Additional file 1: Fig. S23). These results suggested that PSB and hydrogen treatment could promote the immune response in tumor tissues.
Hydrogen therapy stimulated immunity in vivo. A The expression of CD86 and MHC II in DC. B Schematic diagram of B16-F10 tumor model. C TNF-α; IFN-γ; IL-1β and IL-6 level in the serum. D Flow cytometry analysis of CD4+ T, CD8+ T cells in mice tumor tissues. E Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence analysis of CD4+, CD8+, CD161 and Foxp3 in tumor tissues. Scale bar, 50 μm. F Bar graph of CD4+, CD8+, CD161 and Foxp3. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. (n ≥ 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
PSB reduced immune escape in B16-F10 cells
The tumor tissues were taken to test the level of PD-L1 (Fig. 6A). Results showed that the PD-L1 level in the tumor tissue remained unchanged (Fig. 6B, C). Both hydrogen therapy and PSB can stimulate immunity and promote the release of TNF-α. TNF-α have been reported to up-regulate the level of PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells. Therefore, 10 ng/mL of TNF-α and 107 CFU/mL PSB were added to detect the effect on PD-L1 expression in cells. The results were found that TNF-α indeed up-regulated PD-L1, while PSB decreased the expression of PD-L1. When the PSB and TNF-α were mixed and administrated together at the same time, the expression of PD-L1 was remain unchanged comparing with the control group (Fig. 6D). Flow cytometry test also showed the same results (Fig. 6E). It was found that the expression level of PD-L1 increased with the increase of TNF-α concentration indicating a concentration-dependent manner (Additional file 1: Fig. S24). Therefore, we speculated that although cytokines such as TNF-α can up-regulate PD-L1 on the tumor cells surface, some components from PSB could down-regulate PD-L1 expression, resulting in the constant levels of PD-L1 in the final tumor tissue (Fig. 6F). This indicated that PSB could reduce the immune escape of tumor cells and have a positive effect on immunotherapy.
PSB-based H2 therapy avoided immune escape in B16-F10 mice model. A PD-L1 analysis in tumor tissues after different treatments. Scale bar, 50 μm. B Bar graph of quantitation of PD-L1 positive cells. C The expression levels of PD-L1 were determined by tumor tissues with PD-L1 ELISA Kit. D Detection of PD-L1 expression after different treatment with or without TNF-α and PSB. E The expression of PD-L1 was detected by flow cytometry. F Schematic diagram of PD-L1 expression. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. (n ≥ 3). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Conclusions
In summary, we successfully used PSB as a microbial hydrogen production for tumor-targeted hydrogen and immune therapy. PSB could continuously release H2 via photosynthesis under visible light. The results showed that H2 had good therapeutic effects both in vitro and in vivo. More interestingly, due to the presence of PSB, PD-L1 levels will not be up-regulated, which was helpful for increasing immunotherapy and reducing immune escape. Therefore, the combination of hydrogen therapy and self-activated immunotherapy provides a new strategy for cancer treatment.
Methods
Measurement of H2 release using methylene blue (MB) probe
Under the catalysis of Pt, blue MB can be quickly reduced to colorless MBH2 by H2 [42]. According to this feature, the MB probe usually detects the H2 release based on the color change during the MB hydrogenation process. The MB solution had a characteristic absorption peak at 664 nm, and the decrease in absorbance was related to the release of hydrogen. 107 CFU/mL of PSB was dispersed in 4 mL MB solution (9 μg/mL), and then 30 g/L glucose and 100 μg/mL Pt solution were added. The solution was irradiated with a xenon lamp at 14 A for 70 min. UV–Vis spectrum was used to detect the absorption peak at 664 nm every 10 min. The amount of hydrogen produced was detected by the decrease in the intensity of the absorption peak. The amount of hydrogen released under different light sources (808 laser and LED), different light intensities (12, 13 and 14 A) and different glucose concentrations (0, 15, and 30 g/L) were also detected using the above-mentioned method.
H2 release of PSB in MCF-7 cells
MCF-7 cells were cultured in a 6-well plate, and 9 μg/mL of MB-Pt solution was added to incubate in serum-free medium for 3 h. The cell uptake of MB-Pt was stained blue under the microscope. Divide the cells into four groups: Con, Con + L, PSB, and PSB + L. Then xenon lamp was used as a light source to irradiate the cells at 14 A for 5 min. Cells were incubated for another 2 h for further observing the blue color under microscopy.
Detection of intracellular ROS level
DCFH-DA fluorescent probe was used for detection of intracellular ROS. MCF-7 cells with a concentration of 1 × 105 were plated in a 12-well plate until they adhered, and the changes of ROS after hydrogen treatment for different periods of time were detected. 107 CFU/mL of PSB was added at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 8 h and irradiated under xenon lamp at a intensity of 14 A for 5 min. Finally, fluorescent microscopy was used to observe the fluorescence in the cells treated at different times (Nanjing Jiancheng, E004-1-1).
Mitochondrial membrane potential
JC-1 staining was used to measure the loss of MMP. MCF-7 cells were cultured in a 6-well plate and incubated overnight. PSB (107 CFU/mL) was added to two wells, one of which was given xenon lamp irradiation for 5 min at the intensity of 14 A and incubated for 6 h. Cells were stained with JC-1 (Beyotime, C2006) for 20 min and the excess dye was washed away with PBS. Red and green fluorescence were observed with a fluorescence microscope.
Detection of intracellular ATP Level
Intracellular ATP was detected using an ATP assay kit (Beyotime, S0026). MCF-7 cells were cultured in a 6-well plate and divided into four groups: Con, Con + L, PSB, PSB + L. Cells were exposed under xenon lamp for 5 min at the intensity of 14 A and then ATP level was measured using a microplate reader according to the kit instructions.
Measuring caspase-3 in cytoplasm
MCF-7 cells (1 × 105 cells/mL) were seeded in the 6-well plate. After treatment with PSB and light, the cells were collected, and caspase-3 activity was measured by a caspase-3 assay kit according to manufacturer instructions (BestBio, BB-4106). The expressions of caspase-3 were detected at 405 nm using a microplate reader.
In vivo systemic toxicity evaluation
To evaluate the physiological effects of PSB on mice, the mice were first injected with PSB and the blood at different time periods (0, 12, 24 h) was collect for blood biochemistry and blood routine analysis. In addition, we also studied the effect of concentrations (0, 105, 106, 107 CFU/mL) on mice. Weight changes were recorded for 30 days.
In vivo FL imaging
The IVIS system was used to observe the PSB fluorescence of mice in vivo. PSB (1 × 107 CFU/mL) was labeled with the red fluorescence using NHS-RhB. When the tumor volume reached 0.2 cm3, the mice were randomly divided into two groups, and the mice were injected with RhB-labeled PSB (107 CFU/mL) with peritumoral injection. IVIS was used to observe the distribution of PSB in mice at different times. After 48 h, the mice were euthanized, and the organs were removed for further vitro imaging.
Cytochrome C and caspase-3 level detection
Tumor tissues from different groups were lysed, the supernatant was taken for further detection. The samples were subjected to Cytochrome C (Cloud-Clone, SEA594Hu) and Caspase-3 (Jianglai, JL2027596t) detection according to the operating steps in the instructions.
Identification of DCs activation
B16-F10 cells and DCs were divided into four groups (Con, Con + L, PSB and PSB + L) and 107 CFU/mL of PSB was added into B16-F10 cells. And then B16-F10 cells were irradiated for 10 min with xenon lamp (14A) and incubation for 24 h. The PSB was removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was added to DCs for incubation for 24 h. The cell supernatant was used for TNF-α and IL-6 cytokine detection, and the cells were stained with MHC II/FITC (BioLegend Cat. No. 125508) and CD86/FITC (BioLegend Cat. No. 105005) respectively. The fluorescence expression levels were detected by flow cytometry.
Detection of cytokine levels in blood
The mice were euthanized after treatment. Blood was taken from the eyeballs, and the supernatant was collected after centrifugation. TNF-α (Bioss, bsk12002), IL-6 (Bioss, bsk12004), IFN-γ (Bioss, bsk12001), IL-1β (Bioss, bsk12015) in the blood were detected with Elisa Kit.
Detection of PD-L1 level in B16-F10 cells
PD-L1 levels after PSB and TNF-α treatment were measured: 1 × 105 cells /mL B16-F10 cells were cultured in six-well plate, and incubated overnight, and divided into four groups. Each group was added with PBS, 1 × 107 CFU/mL PSB, 10 ng/mL of TNF-α cytokines, both PSB and TNF-α (Peprotech, 315-01A). After 24 h of incubation, PD-L1 ELISA Kit was used to detect the expression level of PD-L1 (Cloud Clone, SEA788Mu).
Availability of data and materials
All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional file.
References
Dole M, Wilson FR, Fife WP. Science hyperbaric hydrogen therapy: a possible treatment for cancer. Science. 1975;190:152–4.
Wan WL, Lin YJ, Chen HL, Huang CC, Shih PC, Bo YR, et al. In situ nanoreactor for photosynthesizing H2 gas to mitigate oxidative stress in tissue inflammation. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:12923–6.
Shirakawa K, Kobayashi E, Ichihara G, Kitakata H, Katsumata Y, Sugai K, et al. H2 inhibits the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2022;7:146–61.
Pan WZ, Li Z, Qiu S, Dai CB, Wu SY, Zheng X, et al. Octahedral Pt-MOF with Au deposition for plasmonic effect and Schottky junction enhanced hydrogenothermal therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Mater Today Bio. 2022;13: 100214.
Wang SH, Liu K, Zhou Q, Xu C, Gao JB, Wang Z, et al. Hydrogen-powered microswimmers for precise and active hydrogen therapy towards acute ischemic stroke. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31:2009475.
Alwazeer D, Liu FF, Wu XY, LeBaron TW. Combating oxidative stress and inflammation in covid-19 by molecular hydrogen therapy: mechanisms and perspectives. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:5513868.
He YJ, Zhang B, Chen YH, Jin QF, Wu JR, Yan F, et al. Image-guided hydrogen gas delivery for protection from myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury via microbubbles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:21190–9.
Sun Q, Cai JM, Liu SL, Liu Y, Xu WG, Tao HY, et al. Hydrogen-rich saline provides protection against hyperoxic lung injury. J Surg Res. 2011;165:e43–9.
Lin Y, Kashi A, Sakamoto T, Suzukaw K, Kakigi A, Yamaso T, et al. Hydrogen in drinking water attenuates noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs. Neurosci Lett. 2011;487:12–6.
Kubota M, Shimmura S, Kubota S, Miyashita H, Kato N, Noda K, et al. Hydrogen and N-acetyl-l-cysteine rescue oxidative stress-induced angiogenesis in a mouse cornealalkali-burn model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:427–33.
Chen CW, Chen QB, Mao YF, Xu SM, Xia CY, Shi XY, et al. Hydrogen-rich saline protects against spinal cord injury in rats. Neurochem Res. 2010;35:1111–8.
Ohsawa O, Ishikawa M, Takahashi K, Watanabe M, Nishimaki K, Yamagata K, et al. Hydrogen acts as a therapeutic antioxidant by selectively reducing cytotoxic oxygen radicals. Nat Med. 2007;13:688–94.
Lu HT, Chen W, Liu WR, Si YC, Zhao TT, Lai XL, et al. Molecular hydrogen regulates PTEN-AKT-mTOR signaling via ROS to alleviate peritoneal dialysis-related peritoneal fibrosis. FASEB J. 2020;34:4134–46.
Kim J, Kim J, Bae JS. ROS homeostasis and metabolism: a critical liaison for cancer therapy. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48: e269.
Cui J, Chen X, Zhai X, Shi DC, Zhang RJ, Zhi X, et al. Inhalation of water electrolysis-derived hydrogen ameliorates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats—a possible new hydrogen resource for clinical use. Neuroscience. 2016;335:232–41.
Gao Q, Song H, Wang XT, Liang Y, Xi YJ, Gao Y, et al. Molecular hydrogen increases resilience to stress in mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7:9625.
Zhao PH, Jin ZK, Chen Q, Yang T, Chen DY, Meng J, et al. Local generation of hydrogen for enhanced photothermal therapy. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4241.
Yu SM, Li GW, Zhao PH, Cheng QK, He QJ, Ma D, et al. NIR-laser-controlled hydrogen-releasing PdH nanohydride for synergistic hydrogen-photothermal antibacterial and wound-healing therapies. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1905697.
Zhou GX, Wang YS, Jin ZK, Zhao PH, Zhang H, Wen YY, et al. Porphyrin–palladium hydride MOF nanoparticles for tumor-targeting photoacoustic imaging-guided hydrogenothermal cancer therapy. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019;4:1185–93.
Kou Z, Zhao PH, Wang ZH, Jin ZK, Chen LH, Su BL, et al. Acid-responsive H2-releasing Fe nanoparticles for safe and effective cancer therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:2759–65.
Fan MJ, Wen YY, Ye DE, Jin ZK, Zhao PH, Chen DY, et al. Acid-responsive H2-releasing 2D MgB2 nanosheet for therapeutic synergy and side effect attenuation of gastric cancer chemotherapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:1900157.
Li ZT, Wang TX, Liu J, Rawding P, Bu J, Hong S, et al. Chemically and biologically engineered bacteria-based delivery systems for emerging diagnosis and advanced therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33:2102580.
Qiao N, Du GS, Zhong XF, Sun X. Recombinant lactic acid bacteria as promising vectors for mucosal vaccination. Exploration. 2021;2:20210026.
Suh SB, Jo A, Traore MA, Zhan Y, Coutermarsh-Ott SL, Ringel-Scaia VM, et al. Nanoscale bacteria-enabled autonomous drug delivery system (NanoBEADS) enhances intratumoral transport of nanomedicine. Adv Sci. 2019;6:1801309.
Igarashi K, Kawaguchi K, Kiyuna T, Miyake K, Miyake M, Singh AS, et al. Tumor-targeting salmonella typhimurium A1-R is a highly effective general therapeutic for undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft nude-mouse models. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;497:1055–61.
Yi X, Zhou H, Chao Y, Xiong SS, Zhong J, Chai ZF, et al. Bacteria-triggered tumor-specific thrombosis to enable potent photothermal immunotherapy of cancer. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba3546.
Chen WF, Wang Y, Qin M, Zhang XD, Zhang ZR, Sun X, et al. Bacteria-driven hypoxia targeting for combined biotherapy and photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12:5995–6005.
Shinnoh M, Horinaka M, Yasuda T, Yoshikawa S, Morita M, Yamada T, et al. Clostridium butyricum MIYAIRI 588 shows antitumor effects by enhancing the release of TRAIL from neutrophils through MMP-8. Int J Oncol. 2013;42:903–11.
Park W, Cho S, Kang D, Han JH, Park JH, Lee B, et al. Tumor microenvironment targeting nano-bio emulsion for synergistic combinational X-Ray PDT with oncolytic bacteria therapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9:1901812.
Yang H, Jiang F, Ji X, Wang L, Wang Y, Zhang L, et al. Genetically engineered bacterial protein nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2021;16:105–17.
Chowdhury S, Castro S, Coker C, Hinchliffe TE, Arpaia N, Danino T, et al. Programmable bacteria induce durable tumor regression and systemic antitumor immunity. Nat Med. 2019;25:1057–63.
Lu HF, Zhang GM, Wan T, Lu YF. Influences of light and oxygen conditions on photosynthetic bacteria macromolecule degradation: different metabolic pathways. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:9503–8.
Zhao EM, Liu HF, Jia YR, Xiao TS, Li JX, Zhao GQ, et al. Engineering a photosynthetic bacteria-incorporated hydrogel for infected wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2022;140:302–13.
Zheng PL, Fan M, Liu HF, Zhang YH, Dai XY, Li H, et al. Self-propelled and near-infrared-phototaxic photosynthetic bacteria as photothermal agents for hypoxia-targeted cancer therapy. ACS Nano. 2021;15:1100–10.
Sunita Μ, Mitra CΚ. Photoproduction of hydrogen by photosynthetic bacteria from sewage. J Biosci. 1993;18:155–60.
Hallenbeck PC, Liu Y. Recent advances in hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;4:4446–54.
Trchounian A. Mechanisms for hydrogen production by different bacteria during mixed-acid and photo-fermentation and perspectives of hydrogen production biotechnology. Rev Biotechnol. 2015;35:103–13.
Zhou FQ, Gao J, Xu ZA, Li TL, Gao A, Sun F, et al. Overcoming immune resistance by sequential prodrug nanovesicles for promoting chemoimmunotherapy of cancer. Nano Today. 2021;36: 101025.
Chen SB, Li DD, Du XJ, He XY, Huang MW, Wang Y, et al. Carrier-free nanoassembly of doxorubicin prodrug and siRNA for combinationally inducing immunogenic cell death and reversing immunosuppression. Nano Today. 2020;35: 100924.
Luo M, Wang F, Zhang H, Kenneth KW, Wu SC, Chen Z, et al. Mitomycin C enhanced the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:141.
Tong QS, Miao WM, Huang H, Luo JQ, Liu R, et al. Tumor-penetrating nanomedicine improves the chemoimmunotherapy of pancreatic cancer. Small. 2021;17:2101208.
Seo T, Kurokawa R, Sato B. A convenient method for determining the concentration of hydrogen in water: use of methylene blue with colloidal platinum. Med Gas Res. 2012;2:1.
Acknowledgements
All authors have provided the corresponding author with written permission to be named in the article. We are grateful to Medical Comprehensive Experimental Center of Hebei University for the animal experiment.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21977024, 21601046 and 31971304), the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Basic Research Cooperation Project (19JCZDJC64100), Cross-Disciplinary Project of Hebei University (DXK201916). One Hundred Talent Project of Hebei Province (E2018100002). Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of Nature Science Foundation of Hebei Province (B2021201038). Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021B1515120065). We are grateful to Medical Comprehensive Experimental Center of Hebei University for the animal experiment. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZL, JZ: Conceptualization; methodology, supervision. HY, MF, HL, TX, DH and RC: Validation, investigation. ZL, HY: Writing—original draft. XZ, JW: Data curation. WZ, CZ, XY: Validation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All the operations involved in the study were approved by the animal ethics committee of Hebei University.
Consent for publication
Not application.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1.
Figure S1. The gram stain of PSB. Scale bar, 10 μm. Figure S2. The standard curve of MB in different concentrations. Figure S3. UV-Vis absorbance spectra of hydrogen production at different concentrations (103, 104, 105, 106, 107 CFU/mL) of PSB. Figure S4. UV-Vis absorbance spectra of hydrogen production at different light intensity (12 A, 13 A, 14 A) of PSB. Figure S5. UV-Vis absorbance spectra of hydrogen production at different glucose concentrations (0 g/L, 15 g/L, 30 g/L) of PSB. Figure S6. H2 production under different light sources. UV-Vis absorbance spectra of hydrogen production under (A) LED and (B) 808 exciting light. (C) Quantity of hydrogen production of PSB under different light sources. Figure S7. The time-dependent temperature changes of PSB with different concentrations of PSB under xenon lamp. Figure S8. Detection of the production and diffusion of H2 in MCF-7 cells via MB probe under different treatments. Scale bar, 500 μm. Figure S9. Cytotoxic effects of PSB and H2. (A) Toxicity of PSB to DC at different concentrations. (B) The study of MCF-7 cells killing effect at different concentrations with or without H2. Figure S10. Calcein AM and PI staining showed confocal fluorescence images of MCTSs with or without xenon lamp irradiation for 10 min. (green: living cells; red: dead cells). Scale bar,100μm. Figure S11. Cell apoptosis measured by flow cytometry using Annexin V/PI staining after treatment with H2 for 6 h. Figure S12. Detection of ·OH levels in MCF-7 cells after hydrogen treatment. Figure S13. The mechanistic of H2 therapy on B16-F10 cells. (A) Detection of MMP changed with JC-1 staining in B16-F10 cells. Scale bar, 400 μm. (B) ROS changed in B16-F10 cells after hydrogen treatment. Scale bar, 1000 μm. (C) Fluorescence quantification of ROS. The change of (D) ·OH, (E) ATP activity and (F) Caspase-3 released in B16-F10 cells after treatment with H2. Figure S14. In vivo fluorescence imaging of mice in control and PSB group at different time after injection. Figure S15. The vivo metabolism of PSB at different time points. Figure S16. The blood biochemistry and blood routine of ICR mice after injection PSB (107 CFU/mL) for different times. Figure S17. Weight changes in ICR mice for 30 days after the injection of PSB with different concentrations. Figure S18. Tumor volume in each group after different treatments (n=6). Figure S19. H&E staining analysis of heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney in different treated groups. Scale bar, 50 μm. Figure S20. Expression levels of Caspase-3 and Cytochrome C after the different treatments in vivo. Figure S21. Antigen stimulated DC activation. (A) The MHC II and (B) CD86 proteins were measured by flow cytometry on the DC after H2 treatment. Figure S22. The effect of H2-immunotherapy in vivo. (A) Images of mice within 14 days after different treatments. (B) Survival curve, (C) Tumor volume and (D) Body weight of mice after different treatments. Figure S23. Gram staining in the tumor tissue. Scale bar, 50 μm. Figure S24. Effects of different concentrations of TNF-α on PD-L1 expression.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, H., Fan, M., Liu, H. et al. Microbial hydrogen “manufactory” for enhanced gas therapy and self-activated immunotherapy via reduced immune escape. J Nanobiotechnol 20, 280 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01440-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01440-7
Keywords
- Photosynthetic bacteria
- Hydrogen therapy
- Oxidative stress
- Immune escaped
- Immunotherapy